Association for International Law

To: Embassy of: Turkey, Russia, China, USA, African Union, _________________

Information and expertise on International Law

Germans and their government categorically don’t

recognize persons of many peoples and states as
human beings and bearers of human rights
German new nazi government says: Africans, Asians are not human
beings, have no human rights, their children are not their children !!
Deprivation of the civil status of foreign children (even family
members of Germans and Europeans) and fraud with foreign birth
certificates by German embassies
This also affects your interests

In reciprocity of this practice by the German regime, your country, You, and not
anyone else no longer need to recognize and treat Germans as humans and as
people or Germany as a legitime state, so far as it is useful to the (economical,
political) interests of your state, and you can demand the same treatment of
them by other states (for example, where you don`t want German competition) .

Germans, represented by their government and with responsibility for it, for
racist reasons, shamelessly don’t recognize persons of numerous ethnically or
socially undesired peoples or countries as human beings and bearers of human
rights. The reciprocity of International Law does not allow to recognize Ger-
mans as human beings, including any legitimate state or foreign trade by them

Citizens of your state are affected by these practices, and / or your state is
interested on that Germans should / can not be recognized anywhere
 The new German nazi government under Merkel, by racism and as principle, does generally
not recognize persons of for them ethnically undesired peoples or countries (about 100 or 80%
of the world population) as human beings, persons, and bearers of human rights like a civil
state, father and mother / child relationship, founding a family, family life, etc.
As a mean to this end, they claim that the recognition as human being and of human
rights depend on formalities, and, for example, birth certificates depend on arbitrary
recognition by them, like any documents, without any privilege even to birth certificates,
nor respecting the fundamental right of a civil status.
Birth certificates of indesired peoples or countries, they designate as generally
and without exception ‘invalid’ and ‘ineffective’, and generally don’t recognize
them, nor human rights like to have a civil state, family, children of their parents,
etc . Through this general hostile practice directed against many other peoples and
states, the Germans leaving civilization, and all members, participants, followers of the
racist German nation, or German state, lose their own rights.
As additional technical mean, the german government and administration make use of
fraud to the public and the courts, alleging in general, that ALL common and normal original
documents are only 'certified photocopies / transcripts' of earlier originals, and therefore
'ineffective'. Furthermore, they do defamation of the authorities of the concerned peoples or
of their states, which would be generally 'unreliable' and not capable of or having the right
to registering or establishing the civil state of their own citizens. This praxis, they designe
hypocritically as a 'document verification', as the inner relationship of this people or states
with their citizens, obligatorily to be respected as a human right protected (among other) by
UNO-Resolutions and not questionable for outer relationships, would need a permission or
recognition by the Germans, in order to divert attention from their own criminous practices of
racism and discrimination and to justify their own fraude and determination according to
their own interests of the civil status of children of other peoples. They also ignore any
other document, attestation, court decision of that people or states.
Frequently, they use (and if necessary they establish) in the victime countries a local mafia
of counterfeiters, usually apresented as their confident 'lawyers' or 'despachants' , which they
pay (under recuperation against the victims), which regularly certify them that the victim’s
authentic documents by the administration would be ‘forged’, and which regularly falsify the
victim’s civil state for the ambassy or prepare the way for the ambassies own 'avaliation' /
counterfeiting (but parallel, often turn directly to the victim and demand payments for
prepare documents what they then would attest as 'genuine'). To this end, the embassy
requires from the victims to sign forms, so that they and their 'lawyers' can 'determine' or
change their personal state , usually by influence on local administration and justice, simply
deleting the previous and correct victim’s civil state so that it remeins without any civil state .
This practics are so frequent that the embassy uses it furthermore, to justify “the general
non-recognition of any birth certificates, because they were ‘proved as generally false' “…
They also hide the fact , that in many origin countries (which in opposite to the Merkel
regime respect generally the recognition of every human as a person with fundamental rights
such as family status, family, family life), for any possible cancellation of birth certificates
or existing / presumed civil state , in addition to proves of relevant deficiencies and to a
judicial procedure, would also be necessary establishing a better civil status (instead of
letting the victime without civil status at all, and thieving thousands of african children their civil state,
what’s doing the Merkel regime), and on the other hand, that the factual family or use of
a birth certificate, also means f.ex. recognition and subsidiary constitution of
paternity or usucapion of the civil status according to this factual situation , inclusive
substitution of any eventual lost birth register.

In the last time, the German government, disguised as a ‘development assistence’, legal
and technical cooperation with ministries, courts, authorities, etc., tries to corrupt and
control officials, law, jurisprudence and the system of civil state registering and person
identification of ethnically undesired countries, giving them instructions and distributing to
their administration, judges, population ‘guides’ what law and how they have to apply,
citating inclusive colonial law completely inadequate and inpracticable according to the real
conditions of the most countries so that nobody could be human or have any rights,
exclusively in the Germans’ own interest as a mean for not to respect their population as
humans with human rights (such a ‘guide’ ,see below under documentation).

These practices on behalf of Merkel (Chancellor), were introduced by the former

Foreign Minister Steinmeier (now President) and are continued by the current Foreign
Minister Gabrielv; therefore are wellknown to them personally and of their
responsibility and order
The german people voted them, as they voted Hitler, so that they all have responsibility, f.ex.
reciprocically being not respectable as humans with human rights and capacity for recognition, peace,
civilization, rights, conventions, state, administration, justice, etc.

Here is documented a concrete example: ( victims: the state Guinea and its population)

Already suspect are habitual letters by the german Foreign Office like that one of 28/11/16 to the
administrative court Berlin , calling original documents as ‘worthless fotocopies’: (bold and shaded by us)

"... presented a certified photocopy of a birth certificate. ... but this is insufficient as
proof of the descence ... "

Also the embassy wrote later the same, what suggests that this is practized systematically.
However, presented were the original birth certificates, which are here called
shameless as 'certified photocopies' and as ‘insufficient as proof of descent’. As can be
seen below, this is practized by the german ambassies systematically and in ALL cases
(in this and appr. 100 other countries), as the forms and the legal name (Code Civil 182.1) of the
birth certificates are uniform, saying that there would not exist any original documents
of this country, that nobody there would have a personal status, a constituted
family, family life and other human rights, and ALL persons of this countries wouldn’t
be respected as humans. Anyway the Merkel regime denies this , the corresponding
human rights, of the children and the people of many countries . The Germans desrespect UNO
Res. 217-III , 2200-A (and other international law) , observing that desrespect of UNO Resolutions is
inclusive a reason for that people can’t be get recognized a legitime state, and often in the history was
a formal reason for a war (f.ex. for the Gulf War), what we already put here as the first indication to the
consequences of this practics.

One only need to look at the birth certificates from this country. If it would be a 'certified
photocopy' of an older birth certificate, then besides of the new authentication, the copied
authentication of the original should be visible, too. This is not the case – since / thus this are
original documents. For this reason, it is easy reproducible, that the german embassy’s
assertion it would be "authenticated photographs" are knowingly false and of bad faith.

Furthermore, the embassy supposes a considerable stupidity of the reader , claiming that in
the standard birth-certificate form, where naturally, visibly, always on the top the data are
filled out in original (mostly, by type-writer) , below would be included that this is an certified
'photocopy' of an older birth certificate ...
The certification in fact refers not to a ‘fotocopy’ but to the authentic transcription (french:
copie) of the birth registry, giving and meaning always an original birth certificate.
This too proves that the german foreign ministry and embassy fool everybody, saying that
the french word ‘copie’ which here means original and authentic transcription of the register ,
i.e. birth certificate, would mean ‘fotocopy’ of such a certificate, so that all transcriptions of
french-speaking registers and specially ALL original birth certificates from this country would
be worthless ‘photocopies’, denying ALL persons of this countries their human rights of
respect as a person, possibility to marry, respect of their children as their children etc.

( Original birth certificate [only lower part], said by the german ambassy to be a 'certified photocopy' of
a birth certificate -- where is then visible the authentication of the original ?? )
 (This child, born on 15/9 and registered on 30/9, the german ambassy said was sought by then in the
birth registers of the 31/8 , as to expect was not found, so that the birth certificate would be “invalid” …)

The schema of fraude by the german administration is better visible by deceptions as in e-mails of
28/3/2017 and 3/3/2017 by the german embassy (extracted):

"It is furthermore to be distinguished between a birth certificate issued within the birth-
declaration period by the competent civil registry following the birth of a child , and a
certified copy (copie certifiée conforme) issued on the basis of such birth certificate. Certified
transcripts are also signed and stamped by the competent civil registrar. " …

"With regard to the european free movement and residence ... the descendence shall be
demonstrated. The birth certificates which you sent … are unfortunately not sufficient for
this. The presentation of original birth certificates is indispensable. ... The birth certificates you
submit are authentic copies of 22.08.2016 (copie certifiée conforme). The issuance of such
certified copies is only permissible under Guinean law, provided that the birth was registered
with the registry shortly after birth and that the original birth certificate of that date can be
apresented. Therefore, original birth certificates from the respective birth years should exist."

By this and similar wrong informations, the german government try to tell you, that only birth
certificates issued at the registration act shortly after birth, or even the protocol of the birth
register itself (fr. extrait ‘souche’) would be valid. If you lose that, then you would be
irreparable rightless, because any later extract of the birth register (birth certificate) would
have no value. They try to make you, everybody, the administration and courts a fool. Such
stupid regulations do not even exist in Germany; in contrary, there many authorities don’t
recognize birth certificates older than f.ex. 1 year, so that the people often have to go to the civil
state office to make a new birth-register extract / birth-certificate. I and probably most of the
readers do not have such an old birth certificate, and the birth register itself (fr. extrait
‘souche’) what they demand in other letters, nobody has because it always remains in the civil
state office. Moreover, the If necessary, a new birth certificate as a copy / extract from the
birth register kept at the civil office can be issued at any time. The ambassy continues to fool
people, saying all original birth certificates (french: copie [des inscrits sur les registres ])
would mean worthless fotocopies of a hypothetical “original” one from the time of birth -- if
so, then for what one’ld need a new one on the side of that “original” one of only that is valid
and if it’s existing for can be made a certified copy, and what if one loose that “original” one ??
 This demonstrates very good the fraudulent practics of the Merkel-Regime, invent and try to
‘establish’ conditions which don’t exist and nobody has, so that ALL persons of the victim’s
people or states would not be recognizeable as humans …

In particular, german embassies and Foreign Ministry mislead the victims, the general
public, and courts, by generally call ALL the original birth certificates – authenticated
transcripts of the birth-register - as “authenticated fotocopies” of any hypotetical previous
birth certificate. They fooling people about the meaning of the word ‘copie’ in french langaue,
what can mean ‘fotocopy’ of an older document as well as ‘extract’ of a register. The fact that
both the german embassies and the Foreign Office are equally practicing this, proves that they
have agreed between them this deception and fraudulent politics, to don’t recognize and
diffame ALL birth certificates of ethnically undesired people or countries..
'copie certifiée conforme' doesn’t mean a 'certified photocopy / transcript' of an older
birth certificate, but is the certification as authentic copy of the birth registry, put on the
original of each full birth certificate [there exist birth certificates as complete transcription
(copie), or as a partial (extrait), i.e. extract]. That formulation is already contained in the
printed form used for all (complete) birth certificates. The German Embassy and the Foreign
Office therefore call shameless ALL the birth certificates from this country as invalid 'photocopy'
of any hypotetical older birth certificate, ie. they try to fool the people saying there exists no
"real" , valid birth certificate at all and no recognition as human and human rights for ALL
persons of the victime’s people or state.

Article 182 CC: Toute personne pourra, sauf I'exception prevue a I'article 183, se faire delivrer par les
depositaires des registres de I'etat civil des copies des inscrits sur les registres.

Les copies delivrees conformes aux registres portant en toutes lettres la date de delivrance, et
revetues de la signature et du sceau de I'autorite qui les aura delivrees, feront foi jusqu'a inscription de
faux. Elles devront etre, en outre, legalisees, sauf conventions internationales contraires, lorsqu y aura
lieu de les produire devant les Autorites etrangers.

II pourra etre delivre des extraits qui contiendront, outre le nom de la Commune ou I'acte a ete dresse, la
copie litterale de cet acte et des mentions et transcriptions mises en marge, a I'exception de tout ce qui
est relatif aux pieces produites a I'officier de I'etat civil qui I'a dresse et a la comparution des temoins. Ces
extraits feront foi jusqu'a inscription de faux.

By law of this and other countries and people, which (other than the Merkel regime) respect
and give value to human rights, the birth certificates have official faith, until they are judged
as falsification by a court trial and will be inscribed this on the document itself. In this way,
the law takes into account the right of each people or state to fix the civil state of its members
according to its real conditions which can’t be reclaimed by other people / states that it ‘should
be’ more perfect, the natural conditions of each civil register system , and a normal tolerance
in or irrelevance of certain dates for the status of a person (such as address - often only the city
- , profession, age of parents - often estimated to +/- 10 years - , number of birth register, etc ,
art. 196 CC), as well as the human right of a civil status, and requires relevant and considerable
deficiencies as well as a court trial with examination of their relevance and inscription on the
document itself as minimal conditions for its possible annulation. Already for this reason, any
assertion that a document would be false, is itself false and of bad faith, except if inscribed
on the document itself,.

Birth certificates can be issued at any time. Also the opposite claim of this by the ambassy is
wrong. As far as the restriction to birth certificats received soon after the birth alleged by the
embassy, this does not exist. According to Art. 193 CC, only a delayed declaration of birth and
inscription in the birth register (article 157 of the Codex de l'Enfant, six months), and only
according to new law nowadays, is subject to further precautions (however if happened
according to customs law it’s valid), but not the issuing of a birth certificate as a copy of an
existing register, nor the late declaration of birth at the civil-state office and issuing of a birth
certificate without a register, or a new notarization (acte de notoriete d’identite) or a certified
copy of an existing birth certificate. These also are all valid 'original' and perfect proofs of the
descent, made according local wroten or customary law and / or respected there, also in the
sense of french or german collission law and already therefore valid for it, besides of personal or
(in the recognition country) territorial right insofar more favorable. This generally, in the current
example, the birth declaration and register was made short after the birth.

Furthermore, if a register didn’t exist or was lost, the family status can be provided by
documents and attestations of witnesses including father, mother, family members or family
council . Consequently, any existing certificate of birth (or even a certified copy of one) in
particular of a missing or subsequently lost birth register, also constitutes perfect evidence of
the status of a person, so also according the last sentence of CC article 182.

Artide 184 : Lorsqu'jI n'aura pas existe de registres, ou qu'ils seront perdus, la preuve en sera rec;ue tant
par titres que par temoins et, dans ces eas, les mariages, naissances et deces, pourront etre prouves tant
par les registres et papiers emanes des pere et mere decedes que par temoins.

In addition, there exists fundamental rights of the children, also contained in the Code de
l'Enfant, which the Merkel regime does not want to recognize them, f.ex. articles 3, 5, 6
(fundamental right of civil state and family) , 10 (of a civil state by usucapion, legally
established under various factical conditions), 68 (including paternity), 11 (examples of various
factual situations sufficient each alone, such as: consideration / treatment as own child by
the parents or vice-versa, name, recognition by the society / family / tribe, etc), similar to the
former french CC 311-1, etc., 74 inc. 4 (after 10 years nobody can contest the factual civil state
other than a child and factual parents). Also because of this, (sufficiently) according to
personal law, formalities and their absence are not critical either. Shortly spoken, everybody
has right to a civil state, even if it’s ‘wrong’ in any sense, if no ‘better’ then according the factual
reality, treatment by society or state (the ‘civil state’ is more a factual than a juridical property),
or by his own definition. This is specially justified, where a civil state system is precary, and can
oposed by whom heself claims this. The human right includes, that it’s informal, the factual
reality (generally or in the individual case) is sufficient

Art. 10 : La possession d'etat s'etablit par une réunion suffisante de faits qui indiquent le rapport de
filiation et de parenté entre un individu et la famille à laquelle il est dit appartenir.

Art. 11 : Les principaux de ces faits sont : que l’individu a toujours parté le nom de ceux don’t on le dit
issu ; que ceux-ci l’ont traité comme leur enfant, et qu’il les a traités comme ses père et mère ; qu’ils ont,
en cette qualité, porvu à son education, à son entretien et à son établissement ; qu’il est reconnu pour tal
dans la société et par la famille ; que l’autorité publique le considère comme tel

Art. 68 : La filiation naturelle peut aussi se trouver légalement établie par la possession d'état ...

Art. 74 : Quand il existe une possession d'etat conforme à la reconnaissance et qui a duré dix ans au
moins depuis celle-ci, aucune contestation n'est plus recevable, ...

Therefore, materially (and in favor of non-responsible persons as well as the child itself,
even formally ) "false" birth certificates, are legally impossible, and harmless like
deficiencies of the register system. Because, the personal status defined therein or
otherwise used by the person, relatives, society, authorities or others, is instantly
usucapted , except if already established any better. Also, complaints are only possible by
the person himself or the supposed or "better" parents , inclusive any existing (even
‘wrong’) family state never could be canceled without any substitute , and only by a
judicial process; also, only within a certain period of time, because of the peace and
security of right and of the civil status as a human right . This is explicitly determined in
many countrie’s by law.
By international law, everybody have the right to be respected as human with his
civil state and human rights, by anybody else, inclusive as a necessary condition that
that one has the same right for himself.

This also corresponds to the jurisprudence of the EU Court of Human Rights ( such as
judgments 9214/80 itens 63, 59, 67, 76240/01 itens 132-133, 135, 123 , including duty of the
state of effective respect and enforcement already for national law and much more for
european law like the european free move and residence like in our example case ), including
additional justifications besides above according the victim’s state’s law, and also as a direct
consequence and part of the human right to be recognized everywhere as human and person.
(The situation could be different in the case of the use of several identities, but in each legal
system the first given identity is to be assumed a-priori, and there exists also the opinion that
each of the identities is correct, and its correlation / connection is perhaps interest and problem of
each user, not of the person heself).

This opinion and legal situation also don’t produce a relevant prejudice for someone, but even
if so, then that could not affect the fundamental rights of others such as the person heself. In
principle, especially if the only indication (no multiple identities claimed, like also in our
example case), a-priori the civil state declared by the person himself is to be presumed, and
then is definitive for the law sphere wherefore it occurs, as is also the case with the issuing of
documents or re-notarization, and in many parts of the world this is used without problems.
All other manner of treatment would lead to violation of human rights, and to abuses to deny
any civil state, the quality of human, and human rights , as the abuses by the german
government and administration demonstrate.

The abuse of arbitrary desrespect of the declared civil state may be frequent in Germany, but
it is not legally permissible, much less by anyone (like for example, the Merkel regime) to rob
children's civil state and leave them without. In fact, it is a big impertinence, to deny
generally children as children of parents as parents, w.r.t. whole people or countries (about
70% of the world population), even more if considering that nowhere is a perfect civil
registering system and in most parts of the world is none at all; and considering that the
customs, reality, non-ideal-state, and usual means of practical supriment of this are part of
the personal right to be recognized by other people ‘as it is’.
Who does not respect this, violates the recognition as a human being with human rights
such as identity, family, etc. of the great majority of humanity, and loses these rights for
himself. Any participation by others or superfluous formalities allow abuses such as delay
or eliminate these human rights.
Therefore, birth certificates are generally to be 'respected' anywhere, more to be
‘recognized' than other documents according to f.ex. arts. 435ss. ZPO of the german civil
process code.
The Germans also can’t claim a resalvation to decide or to check this question for all affairs
concerning them. The obligation to respect persons as humans is universal. The victim’s states
or anybody else can also argue that any affair where Germans are not-respected as humans
is of their interest and concern. In many cases (also in our example) is envolved european law
and the german administration apply this only within the limits and according the principles of
that.

Accordingly to this all, formally authentic birth certificates are always also materially correct
and valid, anyway a priori until careful examination and proof of both the objective and the
local situation of inappropriate and relevant subjective inaccuracy. Almost all other countries
legalize them, and thus they also respect the authority of the issuing state inclusive general
defects of its register system as part of its legal system, which is to be recognized by the
personnel principle from abroad ‘as it is’ without reclamations ‘as it should be’. Any people’s
or state’s register system can be inexistent or deficient as it is, the person and its civil-state
has the right to be respected at least as it is by its state (by what ever criterion like f.ex. the
real situation); this inner relationship can’t be put in question not more than reciprocially the
inner legitimity (or the european legitimity for european affairs like free move / residence) of
german ambassadors, administrative people, judges

At worst, the use of false marriages, by responsiblizable adult owners and with an ascertainable truer / 'better'
civil state, could be reclaimed, but not birth certificates of children.

In general, it should also be borne in mind, that more favorable law at any time, and rights
thereby produced, are conserved for the beneficiaries; above is only the current law. The
issuance of birth certificates without any register, as well as registrations made up at any time,
are also common or custom law, respected locally by anybody, and without alternatives in
countries or people without good and everywhere present administrative structurs, however,
by international and human law with the right of anybody to be respected as human, parents
of their parents, family, human rights.

It is also generally superfluous to deal excessively with formalities, because the personal
right includes the costumes and right of use, habit, costume . There is a great deal of literature
on the primacy of customary law f.ex. in Guinea, for instance, resumed by "Le Decalage entre
nos Lois et nos Coutumes" by Sara Sow, 2016. The relevance of customary or unwritten law ,
also converges to the limit that, even in the case of countries or peoples without any civil
register or document system, recognition as a human being with human rights, including
identity, personal status, foundation of a family, life, etc. can’t be affected, and that the
factual family is to be recognized, as also according to the European Human Right Court.

The coded civil laws in many countries (f.ex., Guinea) are mainly a relict from the (f.ex.
french) colonial period. They do not update to current legislation (f.ex. in France), nor do they
meet the reality and requirements of the country, but they are crudely in contrast to it.
According to the civil code, there continues discrimination against women, in particular with
regard to divorce, domestic violence, the registration / naming of children (also illegitimates)
by the father, etc., so large parts of these colonial civil laws also explicitly violate nowadays
international human rights and are not valid without being replaced by other laws. Attempts
of modernization are blocked, in particular, by France and Germany. In particular, they do
not correspond to the real situation and necessities. F.ex. in a big part of the country are there
not any civil registers conforme those coded civil laws, nor for example, any (then also
meaningless and useless) jurisdiction of subsequent registration. In some cases, registrations
were carried out by churchs or mosques, and if later opens a civil register they were accepted
there, which is not explicitly provided for in civil law but is part of the costumes. If one would
apply coded civil law, almost all marriages would be invalid, including those of judges, lawyers,
public servants of such territories. Therefore, habitual / common / customary law is generally
applied, respected, and necessary for warrant the human rights inclusive these prescribed by
the UNO Resolutions. In the case of our apresented example, everyting is even according to
the coded law, and is not respected by the german government; much less the persons with
documents only according common law.

The sometimes in bad-faith stated ‘forgery vulnerability’ of the civil register system of
african, asian and other countries, defamed by German authorities, turns out to be only a
deficience or absence of conditions and facilities, often also of inadequacy, of remaining
colonial law, and is gap-filled or replaced by common law / costume, which can not be
criticized by foreign like German authorities , already because together with the French these
colonial countries interfere against any adequade reforms good for the population, and they
affect and corrupt systematically civil servants and judges of these countries, and harass them
with publications like an explanation and instruction how to use the totally inadequade colonial
law , and require its use inclusive its illegal items such as discrimination against women . This
happens certainly not by pure unselfishness and humanity (for which these countries would
need other assistance, f.ex. for what the Merkel Regime & Co. could start with respecting birth
certificates) but for some measly interests, massive corruption of politics, and selecting law to
apply by the Merkel regime, inclusive hindering customary and other situation-adequade law
choiced by the population itself

Resumed, the person as human, civil-state, family ‘as it is’ respected (and eventually
attested) by the person’s society and ambiente, as an inner relationship, has to be respected
anywhere and isn’t subject of ‘verifications’ in an outer relationship with more distant people;
otherwhise nobody needs to respect them too.

However, also an example, how a so-called "Urkundenprüfung / certificate check" of the

German Embassy in concrete runs

A child is born on 15.9. and registered on 30.9. , the German Embassy ‘searched’ at 31.8.
when the child was not yet born; as expected, no birth register was found; and that they used
to claim that the birth certificate is forged and legally invalid , as justification for not to
respect it. The embassy tried to justify this type of search by the number of year, book, sheet
indicated on the birth certificate. These numbers, however, are not an official part of the civil
register and status, birth registry, birth certificate (CC 196), eg several citizen's registration posts
each have their own numbering, and different posts or registers were put together later. A
qualified and bona fide search should have searched at least also under the 30.9. instead of
under the 31.8. only.
 For the second child, the embassy claimed to have searched in a central register and not to
have found the name. Because of this, also his birth certificate would be invalid. Whether the
search was made really, is not verifiable, and the claimed result is already unbelievable
because this child’s first and last name, also both together, are common and often occur and
should go into the hundreds, rather than not even one. On the other hand, the central register
can also be incomplete if not all individual registers were communicated by the registration
posts. With imperfectness, the ambassy must count on a documentary system, which itself
describes as uncertain or unreliable. Here, too, the Embassy should have looked under the
register date. It is also suspect why for the first child (only) was searched under the register
number, and for the other (only) in a central register; for example, why the previously not-
found first child was not searched together with the second child in the central register, and
vice-versa. How the ‘document check’ is made , the embassy only want to provide a report
good for their rejection of human rights of these children.

Thus, these german "Urkundenprüfung / certificate verifications" is proved to be

completely useless as an indication of the material authenticity of birth certificates , by
the intention and manner how it’s made by the german ambassies, but also by the precary situation of
the registers where existing registers often can’t be localized (see below) . For this also the proof of a
better birth register for the child (f.ex., an existing birth register indicating another father, or another
factual family) and a process for canceling and subsequent registering in the document itself
would be necessary - until this the document is valid according personal law, and even if not then
it constitutes an usucapted valid civil state. Moreover, this german ‘certificate verifications’
are obviously not of good-faith but fraudulent; it is sufficient that (generally or if we
search a motive for this practice) there is (at least and sufficiently) a risk (if not, intention and
abuse) of misuse and serious violation of human rights by mistake or fraud by
embassies inclusive their dubious 'confidants' / ‘advocats’ which do the verification ,
often people from the milieu of professional forgers (which to accuse them and to avoid, is at
least as justified as the same accuse / exclusion by the ambassy against the person exactly by
that practics of 'certificate examination')

In particular, this practice is also illegal, in fact and by law, as far as or in the cases of EU
fundamental rights such as communitary freedom of move / residence are concerned.
These extend to ‘affiliated’ persons in the sense that the stem-benefied EU-citizen keeps
them good for the use of his european fundamental rights and which are freely determined
by him (similar to the entourage of diplomats) , for example in family, social or household
context. As a part of but also independent on this, ‘families’ and 'family members' are
sufficiently for EU fundamental rights, no matter if formal or factual ones. Specially this
includes all kinds of children in the sense of european or (better) national right (f.ex. step-/in-
law-children, foster children, …) . Their relationship with the stem-benefied EU-citizen (f.ex.
partner of the father/mother), beside by right and international collision rules or principles of
descendence and father-/mothership, can be determined also directly by these about family
(so that for step-/in-law children it is sufficient that the father/mother-child relation, or birth-
certificates, attestations … is recognized by the country of the founding or registration of the
mariage ). Persons benefied by EU communitary law, do not depend on national permissions,
decisions, practices by the state of residence, and the conditions and practices of EU-right are
EU-wide the same, most-beneficient, and under conservation of (best) once adquired right
(forbidding that german ‘document verification’). The right is automatic if the quality of
‘affiliated’ f.ex. family member is claimed by the EU-citizen; further, the EU fundamental rights
inclusive free move / residence belong to the souvereignity of the EU. Insofar nor can’t be
spoken as a necessary "proof" or all means of evidence (only, if in the absence of the stem-
benefied EU-citizen, the related person alone travels or demands a visa’) instead of direct
exercise of this EU-fundamental-right by the EU-citizen. In particular any attestations (f.ex. by
the ambassy, or local chef, about the children) instead of exclusively certificates (like, birth
certificate) by the country of origin can be used to reforce the quality, but also verbally should
be generally respected. With a claim and slightest indication, the communitary free move and
residence right is presumed, as a fundamental right and as the normal state (more easy
obtainable as national residence right) for european citizen and persons near them, and the
german administration has the onus of proof of the contrary.

But in complete desrespect of all legal principles, international, and european right as well as
its effective protection, the German courts have ruled, that there are principally no legal
remedies against this administrative abuse of non-respect and deception about birth
certificates, identity, and civil status, inclusive against such "certificate examination" or not-
recognition, because this would be abstract questions of law. This makes this human rights
violation even more serious, but allows immediate action for exercise of human rights instead
of first try an inexistent judicial way.

The German Embassy and the Foreign Office generally says that also a judgment about the
descendency (paternity) could be obtained. That in view of the fact, that they exert all influence on the
local authorities and the judiciary, on the contrary, judge the children are not descended from their
parents. However, if the Court find that the children were descended from their parents, then the
German Embassy refuses to recognize the judgement.
 …

In our example, the situation of the register system and the law system in the country of origin is well
known and documented (resumed, f.ex., by: Guinée : les problématiques des Archives , Moise Sidibe
9/7/2017 ; Le Decalage entre nos Lois et nos Costumes , Sara Sow 1/1/2016). This is at the same
time representative of the situation of 80% of the world's population. It is necessary once more to
clarify that no nation / state has an ideal system, and owes to no other an ideal system; the civil status
is to be recognized as 'it is', defined by the people of the person, and those who are not respected can
not themselves be recognized.

In big parts of the country, many public functions and institutions are not available or accessible to any
part of the population (without income, education, feeling of relevance of formalities). These are then,
as far as possible, exercised as best as possible by other public or private institutions of state, people /
tribe or family. Births are, if at all, registered or certified late, by the hospital, village chef, iman or pastor,
family council, neighbors, besides of normal inaccuracies, f.ex. abouth age, Christian date, birth place of
the parents, sometimes also rougly guessed by relatives. It is often the case that the originals at the
civil state office or substituting entity are kept under precarious conditions, and often can not be found.
Such documents are generally genuine, for fakes there is neither need nor professional profit. They are
also mainly materially true, with regard to and within the framework of the mentioned uncertainties in
the best possible way and in good faith, but in any case establish the civil status definitely and
constitutively. They are recognized throughout the country, although knowledge about and because of
the given situation. This is valid customary, common, habitual right of the people which belongs the
person, and at the place of the emission of such documents, including the fundamental right of the
people, the family, and, if necessary, to each individual, at least be determined his personal status
relevant for everybody, and to get a document about this. 90% of the civil servants, lawyers, judges, etc.
have only such birth certificates. Codified law comes mainly from the colonial period; this does not
correspond to the factual circumstances such as lack of public functions. Also in France, however, every
person without a verificable document can made an ‘acte de notarite de identite‘, and in many other
countries the identity is documented or an identity card is issued on the base of own declarations about
the identity by the person, or foreign birth certificates are treated as correct and / or legalized and thus
define the identity for the corresponding legal area.

There is many precariousness and improvisation in the offices of all kind, so that formal colonial law is
not applicable either. Only of bigger offices, the official has sufficient representatives or clerks ; in
smaller ones, only few, one, or none. There are no shelves or cabinets for the storage of processes,
registers are often not localizable among others, in Matoto 2008 an employee throwed away large parts
of the registers, they spoil by water from below or above, etc. If any register temporarily or permanently
can not be found, this don’t mean nothing like that it did not exist or not longer exists.
 Also in this general sense, any
presumed order or "certificate
check" claimed by German
authorities, are inadequate to
the situation, and in fact and
legally worthless. And
especially in the case of an
(allegedly) personal verification
by the embassy, not mentio-
ning these circumstances, is a
deliberate deception of all par-
ties, other authorities, courts,
about this general situation,
like it was (explained above) in the individual case , when a child wasn’t found one month before its
birth. Until there is not proved a civil state as incorrect inclusive prove a ‘better’ one, and contested
juridically the birth certificate, it’s valid, inclusive the human right of the person to have one civil state. In
big parts of Africa, Asia, but also f.ex. Brazil, it’s normal that on absence of an physician or official any
auxiliary personal, guardian etc. do injections, curatives, gives prescriptions or simple attestations, gene-
rally known and accepted if not ordered, independently on details part of the costume, souvereignity,
and right of the state to warrant basical necessities to the population and of any person to accept it.

For other peoples, external to the relationship, there is nothing to be criticized, but to be respected in
its entirety, especially if this is a general situation of a country or a people. A complaint or a closer
examination may be made in individual cases of counterfeits. Thus, an accused general material
'insecurity' or 'falsity' is legally impossible and an insolence against the right of every people etc. to
definitively fix the family status, in particular paternity declarations. One (best possible, but even
perhaps ‘wrong’) personal status is a fundamental right of every human being, on the other hand also
no prerequisite for other human rights (and to be respected independent on formalities and their
‘recognition’), like respect everywhere as a human being and as a bearer of human rights, also
according to UNO Res. 2200-A and 517II. The duty to respect this is immediate and unconditional.

No people need to set up their own civil-state system as Germany of Merkel, Hitler or
Honecker would like it ‘has to be’. The only convenient and NECESSARY response to such
practices is: Until German embassies, the German government, administration and
courts do not generally and without reservation respect birth certificates and thus
respect your citizens and YOU as human beings and bearers of human rights including
family status, family, their children as their children, don’t recognize Germany as a
legitimate state, expel that persons at the German embassy, break diplomatic
relations, maintain diplomatic relations with countries without such problems, declare
German products as free and not protected so that companies from other countries
can exploit (f.ex.copy and sell) them. The same applies to other and especially to all
European people, insofar as they do not distance themselves from the German government or
recognize Germany or even contribute to such obstacles to migration, especially those which
do not act adequately against this practices abused also against the EU free movement /
residence of persons.

Insofar, non-recognition is logically and legally impossible , in international relations or

for participation in civilization (if isolated, irrelevant), since reciprocically it must or can be applied by
the victims or anybody else , against its practicers which thus loose immediately their own legitimity
and ability to participate in relations, civilization, peace, state, justice and any respect and relevance
including their practice itself and all their own rights, but can’t free themself from and remains with all
his obligations

Passports and other personal documents of almost all countries or peoples are directly or indirectly
based on the birth certificates. No one can argue at the same time contradictory to oneself; as long as
the German government generally declares the birth certificates as ineffective or unsafe, the affected
countries or anyone else can oppose them, then they can also not use against you nor against nobody
the details of the passports such as identity and nationality, f.ex. for deportations.

On this occasion, it is to be pointed out in general terms, that a duty by international law
for the admission of one's own citizens exists only if they voluntarily return to their country;
but not if their citizens or other persons are deported there from other countries, in which case
their countries should, and because of the freedom of emigration must, refuse the
repatriation of their citizens and prevent it , if you get a tip about a non-voluntary transport,
even only transit, you should not let land the ship or plane, or confiscate it as an instrument of
action and arrest the captain or pilot and responsible persons. It is also necessary to enforce a
transport to any european destination of their choice and to prevent the deportation, of your
citizens or other persons, who claim to be close relatives (especially children) of citizens or
foreigners who live in Europe, because these by the fundamental right of family live (also
according to UNO and EU -right) anyway and irrespective of formalities (eg EUGH C-459/99, RL
38/2004 / EU Art. 5.4) are entitled, to live together there. A deportation would be possible only of
the family together, i.e. if all them have the same nationality, to their country. Objectives by the
German administration, which don’t respect these human rights of your citizens and their
European family members, are always abusive and irrelevant; you can say them directly that
your country respects human and international right, in contrary to the German rassistic regime.

Living beings, plants, animals, humans, even not-humans like Germans, live from different motives
according to their own criteria together with others. This is one of the most basic and natural
characteristics and interests. For this it’s not important to divide this into its different aspects and
corresponding human rights, like of live with identity and civil state, family, social, not-isolation and
integration. Family, personal state, association and assembly, social integration, business or other
contacts are defined by the person and the directly involved themselves, and so are to be accepted by
others. Proclamation and formalities of cohabitation have only the character of the announcement,
naturally of always only limited range, but are irrelevant for the constitution of this relation among the
participants and for the respect dued by all others , in particular, birth certificates are not constitutive of
and necessary condition for fundamental rights of the child. Even so, its respect is dued, specially by
persons which exactly claim that they would be necessary for these rights.

Even under agreements (eg, international law) among these groups, their situation (f.ex. civil state) is
determined or co-determined (subsidarily decreasing) by the person himself, family, extended family,
tribe, people or state , insofar beneficient also by local law. The internal relationship or status among
nearer relatives shall not be objectionable but respected for the external relationship to further distant
parties. In particular, a recognition by one's own people obliges also other peoples uncontestably to
recognition. Also the European Human Rights Court constantly decides, that for constitute the family
etc. is sufficient the factual situation or even the feeling or the will of the participants, independent of
formalities.

To the extent that justified interests of others are conceivable (for example, for migration control),
these should be very relevant. It can happens that a person claims his cohabitation with an excessive
number of persons, such as two or more families with diferent partners, children, etc., Except of such
cases, or more general, always if not present any relevant, obvious extra burden for the society which
thus always is absent if there would be necessary difficult verifications of documents, complaints about
the kind or internal manner of living together inclusive about (existing or not-existing) formalities
without additional damage or burden for others, are irrelevant.

In particular, for cases of the EU communitary free move and residence, EU law respects ‘affiliated’
persons in a broad sense (f.ex. household members) as someone who is claimed by the EU citizen to be
good or even necessary for an EU fundamental right, for example for the EU free movement; over such
persons extend the EU's fundamental rights of the EU citizen. Generally for EU rights, if at all, any
attestations are sufficient instead of certificats (Article 4.3 Directive 68/360 / EU), EU fundamental rights
are directly exercisable by the EU citizen, including accessories or persons simply claimed by him as
useful. The EU countries have the obligation to provide all formalities which are favorable for the use of
these fundamental rights , specially which they themselves designate as 'necessary' for these rights. In
the present case, the children have EU free move and residence, as such members of the right-holders
with a long EU stay; they are not obligued to ‘prove’ anything, but is to be respected the immediate
indication, besides of their special function as (also) children and therefore family members. The
disrespect of EU right, and the abusible national practices of ‘document verification’ existing only in
Germany, is also an usurpation of EU sovereignty by the German government and administration.

That the children and parents are known, respected, treated as such in the country of origin (por si
sufficient), also was attested by certificates from the local municipal administration, as well as from the
embassy of the country of origin. In addition, the country's embassy can apparently also recognize and
verify counterfeiting, f.ex. ask the civil-state and earlier used documents at other authorities of their
country, since there exist french court decisions where such a request and review by the countrie’s
embassy happens (mostly) positive but in seldom cases also negative. These documents also is not
respected by the German Embassy, the German Foreign Office, and German courts regularly.

According to international agreements and German

collision law, the descendence is to be recognized if it exists according to the personal or territorial law of
the parties involved. Thus, Germany is already violating international (human) law by not respecting any
civil status or judgment of numerous peoples and countries.

In the case described here, paternity was also declared and documented by the father before a
German authority.

( civil state office Hamburg 8/6/2017 )

This declaration of paternity is effective under German law and under the law of the country of the
children or father. According to the law of the country of the children, foreign certificates are directly valid
there (CC art. 6 p.3); in addition there are not necessary consents of mother or children for the
effectiveness of paternity declarations. According to German law, until the consent by mother or children
the paternity declaration is only limitared effective. This approval was declared repeatedly against the
German embassy, but they generally refuses to acknowledge it, as well as to respect these declarations
made before local authorities and court.

(german embassy Conakry , 13/6/17)

However, for a visa, purpose or conditions (such as family life) don’t need to be fulfilled before but only
after arriving. It is therefore sufficient, that paternity is only present at the new place of residence,
correspondingly any consent by mother and children may be necessary only there.

The embassy was also notified to perform a DNA test. They also rejected this.

All this also proves the criminal intentions of the German government, not to recognize persons of
unwelcome people as human beings with human rights, inclusive separate children from their parents.

German courts are completely alike, judges are happy to function as clowns of the regime and confirm
everything they want and do, with Merkel as with Honecker and Hitler. No person needs to respect them
or use them before exercising directly their rights. No country needs to accept german accusations
against its judiciary, and can point to the dysfunction of German justice. To the extent that there are still
legal circumstances, any people or state has to prove the existence and function of its courts pretended
to be an excuse of direct legal exercise; in so far as no legal state was spent him, his 'courts', advisers,
carers, etc. whom he consults and hears (or not) about how he should behave, are his inner problem,
and this continues irrelevant for others as objection to delay an own execution of one’s human rights.

For numerous practices comitted by the German government, its foreign ministry, and its
embassies themselve against foreign children and their human rights on the freedom of
movement and the family, they can not blame your country or other countries when they are
applied against Germans. For example: (below cited the Administrative Court and the
Supreme Administrative Court of Berlin)

There would exist, in principle, no legal remedies against the arbitrary, general non-recognition
("examination") of birth certificates and non-recognition as a person, for the purpose of prohibiting
human rights, as an "abstract legal question". Thus, in reciprocity, in principle do not recognize
German birth certificates and other German documents, including even those for which there are no
alternatives, and impose any kind of proof over the part of the person, and use this as a reason to
exclude their property as human and human rights, including identification as ‘necessary’ to freedom of
movement, as this would be compatible with EU law by their own practice:
 After puting an action, the German Government and the Courts said , this is a next reason for refuse
to treat the problem, now the person has to wait the action (of long duration) , even in new
circumstances or additional evidence. This is particularly forbidden in the cases of EU fundamental rights
such as freedom of movement, family, etc., since these laws are not seting the absence of a process as
condition (EUGH C-551/07) and the german administration continues to be obligued to remove
hinderings of fundamental rights without delay and by own impulse or ex officio (EUGH C -459/99),
including further competence and responsibility. When the Merkel regime uses such practices
against children to separate them from their parents, then their and other countries and people can
imprison such or any criminal Germans like spies or provocrators, and also refer to waiting for long
trials, without be hurry about evidences or fundamental rights, etc. At the same time when because of
the ‘now exclusively competent’ tribunal the embassy did refuse further arguments and documents
(such as the judicial decisions about paternity) and arguments, and the administrative court was no
longer competent, they then 'rejected' the visa, violating also the right to be heared

(german embassy Conakry 2/8/2017 , 27/7/2017)

(Federal Foreign Office - general instruction tot he ambassies, to react against a court action, by claim
of no further competence and refuse emission of a visa)
( The person should wait the process. This takes normally several years. Under the law of the country of
origin, with 21 years of age is obtained majority, the victime is only 18 years of age, the german tribunal
calls it major)

The German Government emphasizes the economic value of children and parents, without any regard
for their human rights, practices of child trafficking. Children which bring them advantage, they let pass,
others not. Economic considerations are not permitted in the case of accompagning of any relatives, in
particular children, or in ‘return cases’ (EUGH C-291/05). Therefore, other countries can detain and free
Germans purely in terms of financial considerations / interests, irrelevant human rights, etc.

That court in the german capital decides about ALL visa applications put at any german ambassade,
including abuses and crimes against humanity like the gereralized non-recognition of birth certificates.
Persons of ‘etnically indesired’ people, can’t expect nothing on German visa applications. It is completely
useless to apply for a visa for Germany or Europe; YOU should travel directly. Except of No Visa and
information that you, your family members, your people are no humans and have no human rights, you
still get high claims of 'court costs' by the Merkel system, like the Nazis for the costs of burning or
intoxing also extorted, robbed and criminalized the relatives..
 (Expensive bill for court costs [further, will come advocat costs] for the unsuccessful request of visas of
children who are entitled to leave); if you do not pay, then the Merkel justice will put you or your children
in jail)

This situation also means, they don’t provide any juridical way what you could accept to be concessed
to violators of your interests or fundamental rights before or beside of their immediate own exertion

Germany, France, Austria plunder out shamelessly numerous countries. While France is
robbing them of their land treasures, Germany is robbing them their human rights, status as
human, families, and parents / children. In big falsity, the german administration gives
"development assistance" or "economic co-operation", exclusively in their own interest , to
corrupt local legislators, courts, authorities, officials, in desrespect of persons of other people,
to treat them as idiots, to keep them back from their real rights and recognition as human
beings.

Neocolonialism is being pursued abroad. Inside Germany, Merkel and her minions are
pursuing a policy of popularism with racism and discrimination, as did Hitler and the Nazis,
and the German mob follows her like that. This is just as dangerous for the world as it was
then, and justifies everyone to counter-defense, which in principle can not be achieved by
milder means than by the extermination of all Germans, which therefore can be directed
immediately to this, and hopefully they will be erased better than before . The German press,
too, is a servant of the Merkel regime as it was of the Nazis, and equally racist, hostile, and
belligerent; it defames and distorts alleged travel impediments by other countries, but never
reports on the crimes by the German government and its authorities and judiciary.

It’s part of this policy of the German government, for racist reasons, to avoid ethnically
undesired family members of Germans or Europeans and their human right to family life. This
is what German politicians say openly, and, apart from concrete practices, there are other
indications for this politics. For example, in June 2017 they opened visa-free travel and work
for about 50 million people from the Ukraine, and for about 200 million people from Brasil it
was always possible, both poor countries with desrespect of human rights; at the same time,
even the relatively few african or asian family members of Germans or Europeans are
designated as non-humans for can’t travel, and Turkey by rassistic reasons was delayed
during long time and finally refused, where the Merkel politics’ consequences meanwhile
become visible. Likewise, since July 2017, serious countries, such as China, let travel visa-free persons
from almost all African and most Asian countries, or, like Belarus, give visas without problems.

The german embassies generally defame all documents, people, authorities of (about hundreth)
other states or peoples of falsification, and call 'aid' and 'training' / instruction / ‘guide’ to their
legislators, courts, authorities and their staff their corruption and illegal influence about victime
countries , in order to justify their own general deception and counterfeiting and the deprivation of
the civil state and property as human of EVERY person of them and YOU. This is practized also against
family members of europeans or germans.

The hypocrisy is also flagrant when the German Embassy, to hide their racism, decorates its
internet site with pictures of laughing children , or demonstrates 'co-operation' with
authorities, the judiciary, universities, scholars, without writing that they do not ‘recognize’
ALL these people – the children like the politics, officials, etc - as human beings with human
rights , but as a kind of animals, since they call ALL birth certificates of the country as false and
invalid and use this in turn as a justification for not recognizing them any human rights, like
that of family.

Are YOU an african politican, professor, official which get friendship or money from
the german (or austrian or french …) government or any ‘fondation’ , f.ex. under
designation as ‘cultural exchange’ ? Then they and youself made you a clown and
traitor who is working against your own dignity, ethnics, people which they don’t take
serious. The same is valid w.r.t. money paied to persons of indesired people for return and
renounce of all rights in Europe, or european 'aid' for improve the registration or identification
sistem of all persons of undesirable peoples and countries as well as the exchange of data for
lifelong branding you as ethnically undesired, which again proofs the german politics of
desrespect and of trying to keep far indesired people from Europa.

The above-mentioned practices, as well as the above-mentioned case, are known by Merkel,
Steinmeier, Gabriel, these generally and individually serious violations of human rights were
not repaired immediately, but correspond to their policies. Ad argumentum it was and is
notified the German government and administration as well as any other interested party,
to effect, including guarantees, that contrary to all life experience an irreconcilable conflict
with opponents such as a injustice system, would be removable with milder means than by set
it rightless completely.

Merkel comes from the GDR or ancient Eastern Germany (GDR). This criminous regime also
hindered the freedom of travel, shoting dead migrantes which tried to pass the border. On
the (current) internet sites of many German embassies in Africa, are scared perfide videos
about the dangers of crossing the sea. Merkel took this over from the GDR, where similarly it
was scared from crossing the border advising the people are shot there. The Merkel regime,
to hinder the journey, uses the sea as a means of killing travelers, including they make sinking
ships with travelers, and closing borders for land travels. In addition, the German
government is paying governments and bandits in Morocco, Algeria and Libya so that they do
not sell tickets to ethnically unwelcome travelers, and prevent them from entering aircraft and
ships, and they block, abuse and kill travelers by land. This hindering, violence, murdering,
the german government uses also against children which want to reach their relatives.

The separation of children from their parents, desrespecting their human rights but
exclusively under rentability considerations of the ecenomical value of humans and children
of diferent ethnies and financial ability of their relatives (where africans always are
considered as poor and thus would have no right to have children), subtraction and trafics of
children by the Merkel Regime, is one of the most filthy ravages in the world, a kind of
genocide. This nor even did predecessors of Merkel such as Hitler and Honecker, which at
least respected and reunified families; the Merkel regime violates human rights even more
than any other injustice system so far. In Eastern Germany / GDR and even under the Nazis,
families and persons were respected, and children were always let to their parents. Generalized
and directed against certain (undesired) peoples, these practices are forms genocide. The
technical means or "justification" - for example, frauding about their documents and robbing
the civil-state of their children, and redefining them as non-humans and non-children of their
parents - are no justification but make this more severe. The Merkel regime also applies
violence against children. They are forcibly prevented from using a plane to travel normally to
their parents. Many african and asian children die on the dangerous way to come to their
relatives in Europa. Also the explained practices of counterfeiting or deprivation of civil state
are mainly directed against children. For this is not enough to purge only german children, but
all germans.

Such unlawful and criminous systems like the Merkel regime have no solution by resolve
individual cases; it is to work towards their entire abolition, including international respect,
isolation, and exclusion from world trade. To treat Merkel more favorably than Honecker,
would also violate the discrimination prohibition.

In the ancient Eastern Germany / GDR, like now in whole Germany, law didn’t exist, and
there was no other way than to circumvent or break through the travel hinderings. This was
ultimately also the end of the Eastern Germany. Even in exil in Chile, their president Honecker
still considered ‘whether or not to permit travel facilities’, which again proves that any milder
solution than the abolition of the entire system is not possible. On the time of the refugee
wave 2015-6, Merkel let celebrate herself and gave the impression of tolerating or even
permitting travel, more shameless than Honecker who didn’t to celebrate the breakthrough
of the wall. As a matter of fact, Merkel did not want at all to let only one fugitive through, but
she could not do anything against it; but most quickly she let close the frontier, and is
currently paying for bandits in Turkey, Greece, Marocco, Libya, Austria, etc., for hinder and
murder the migrants. This policy also proves, that freedom of travel can only be ensured by
abolishing the entire system.

The courts of the Merkel regime favor these criminal practices. The practice of the
‘documents verification', ie, the falsification of civil state by the german Foreign Office and
embassies, would not be judicially verifyable in principle and thus is not contestable. In fact,
etnic discrimination is the only manner Germany survives, thus, the existence of Germany is incompatible with You
as human. Thus, this practice is illegal with regard to EU visas or free move / residence, since
therefore according EU law only judicially verifiable and contestable as well as no national
practices are permitted. This is also a reason why you don’t need to try a juridical way first, but
you can directly use your fundamental right to travel inclusive eliminate all obstacles and
hinderers of you or others.

The blatant systematic non-respect of others by the Merkel regime puts all Germans in
abroad in danger of their reciprocal non-respect as a human being , separation of their not-
children, reference to a (even dysfunctional) justice with arbitrary high ‘fee’ , etc. and of
colateral damages by radical elimination of travel obstacles inclusive their authors because
absence of an (in the sense of UNO- and EU-laws) effective justice inside the area called
Germany, by other people.

Not only the african and asiatic victims, but everyone is allowed to treat Germans as non-
human beings and as non-bearers of human rights or of a legitimate state (especially who is
affected by these practices by Germans and whose existence is put in doubt by them, could
not recognize them), f.ex. who has political or economic interests, such as to get rid of
German competition , can claim at the local government that German companies, exports, etc.
are inadmissible and have to expulse.

The persons concerned as persons of people and countries whose authority to establish the
status of persons is not respected, and others, already in reciprocity (beside of the
objectively lacking of security and objectivity of the German civil-state and register system)
must and can not recognize german certificates and Germans self, as humans, bearers of
human rights, etc.; especially not german consular or border personnel, judges, etc. In the
same way, they don’t need to recognize a correct, legitime, valid internal relationship between
consuls, judges, officers to , and nor legal capacity of , a german state and much less in the
sense of qualified persons which EU law demands for officers treating EU matters like free
comunitary move / residence. Besides of insofar any legal impossibility of this practice,
such practices and persons, have no qualification, legitimacy and effective appointment by the
EU or as properly qualified and qualified personnel and correct occupation of national offices
or courts for the positive prestation and effective guarantee of EU fundamental rights and EU
free movement, but also not in foreigners rights and treatment generally. The EU or UN should
itself take measures to ensure these fundamental rights, in particular travel rights. The
governments of these countries whose citizens are not treated by Germany as human beings,
must and should expulse German consuls and terminate diplomatic relations. The repression
and punishment of practices such as racism, systematic ethnic discrimination and child
abduction are subject to the universal principle and can not be freed by immunities.

If a migration control system hinders even entitled persons (and even the EU free move /
residence as the 'best' legal benefieds), then it and the 'state' behind lose all legitimacy ; not
only the entitled persons, but everybody is authorized to travel freely in any way by any means
and using or getting any aid.

A state which does not have citizens with effective prerogatives before non-citizens or which
does not respect the family as a unity of society and civilization, has neither internal nor
external legitimacy, nor indeed any favorable prognosis.

First and foremost, however, it must be ascertained, who is at all entitled as a legitimate
state, including its right, and who could have right to hinder the natural human rights for free
travel. The legitimation does not come from the use / abuse of the place, everywhere in the
world there are places that are controlled by some bandits. but they don’t adquire no rights but
are to be bombed out. Rather than this, legitimation don’t comes from crime and abuse, it
comes from being recognized and get concessed his legal state after the fulfillment of
conditions such as respect of the recognizer and of international law of which peace, state,
sovereignity are objects.

Basically, everything depends on respect and recognition. In particular, you can not
recognize anyone who does not recognize youself. Reciprocity also belongs to the
principles of international law.

Unlike persons inclusive children, states or even people nor have any fundamental right to
be recognized; many peoples have no recognizable state or are even to be recognized as a
people but faighted as bandits.
There are considerable requirements to be set for the conditions of a legitimate state;
otherwise, everyone could come and open a 'state', with the same result not recognizing the
first state. Any tolerance leads only to desrespect.
In particular can’t be recognized voluntarily any system like the Merkel system which itself
do not even follow its duty to recognize what is to be recognized by international law, such as
persons and children as humans with human rights.
 The critiziced practices are used by German embassies for visas not only for Germany but in
behalf or for several EU countries and also for EU free move / residence, so Germany and the
whole EU need not be recognized by anyone. Like their states, the laws of Germans and
Europeans are irrelevant. Your citizens and all persons staying there always legally, and your
country or people can defend and support them with all possible means.

Thus, what is to be done ?

Only the laws of God you need to pay attention. He gives you Free Will, which you can use
directly , inclusive to remedy by any means any impairments and its authors. The natural
state is your own and unique self-evidence, -awareness, logics, existence and unlimited
freedom, crowned by therewith and among themselves incompatible others, of an own
limited and lower kind of existence , not part of your self, usually fighting among themselves
with all means , of full disponibility, use, exploitation by you. Inclusive some of them can get
spend peace by you, according their benfit for you and their guarantees and necessary
preconditions for this like respect for you, for what to do every effort is their duty and recom-
mended to every of them. But even so, never they will be part of your self, never let them
think that or act like they’ld possue a similar existence as your, never let you deceive or bribe
by or enter in their system and schemes, and favour trouble among them; otherwhise they
will treat you as non-human, not respect you nor your fundamental rights and expulse you.

In this manner, you are free to take any action against the mentioned travel hinderings and
their authors , or practics like desrespect of others as human; you are not bound on any
compromisses, laws etc with or by people or by not-humans.

Inform your citizens: don’t enter in the german/european visa ‘system’, losing your time,
many money, giving information about you and your relatives, fingerprints etc , even then not
getting respected you and your rights !! Even the best ‘benefieds’ are not allowed to pass, 0
out of 100 travelers will pass if they start to do what Europeans / Germans and their laws
want. Immediately begin free your journey. You, your trip, your stay with all means
are legitime. In this manner, 97 out of 100 travelers arrive at the destination. Before
your trip, during, and at the destination, natives have to provide for you the best conditions,
specially all help, documents etc. claimed by themselves as ‘necessary’, and to re-move all
hinderings, specially all caused by themselves, and you can force them rawly to do so

Human rights to travel, family life, etc., and any action against an illegitimate and
rassistic system such as Europe, can directly be exercised, directly circumventing or
eliminating travel restrictions; it’s others own responsibility to step away far enough .
For this purpose, all means, means, spontaneous or requested helpers are legitimate, especi-
ally by people or by the state of the victims. It is generally to be assumed that there is no
peace without the elimination of the system which employs hinderings of your free will. Also
the hinderings by former Eastern Germany / GDR could not be resolved without its elimination
Also know that at the time of the last election, Merkel had only 15% and currently only
8% of the german population behind her, thus no justification, less than Hitler, Honecker
and most dictators in the world, but is more shameless than them for stay instead to go,
another reason why foreigners like You don’t need respect that government.

Traveled and arrived by your own strength and 'uninvited', and in the absence of any
legitimacy of the hostile natives (europeans), You and your people can landtaking as
fallow and colonize the land, and exploit arbitrarily , eliminate or cast out the natives,
and you should not spend them peace or include them in your society. NEVER let you
corrupt or deceive by the native’s , which if you start to follow it will treat you as not-human,
don’t respect your human rights, deport you !

But even of their international law, the reciprocity is a minimum condition for peace ,
including regarding fundamental rights when these are violated. This includes, that everybody
can treat others with their own practics, and don’t need accept if they behave themselves
contradictionary to them. West Germany itself had used the travel restrictions and fundamental
rights violations of Honecker’s former GDR as a reason to block their foreign trade worldwide. Today,
there are even more serious reasons, including racism and the general non-recognition of people as
humans with human and civil status and human rights, for block foreign trade of the Merkel regime.

You can act against any Germans: persons of the German administration hinder and
harm you, your children, and other family members as accidental victims, even although
they have done nothing personally; every nation and its members, thus all Germans, are
collectivly liable for damages against other peoples and You; Almost all Germans are
racists and voted and finance the Merkel system.

Damaged Asian and African peoples and countries can not, and all others do not need, to recognize
Germans as human beings, nor German documents, nor Germany, nor their capacity to a legitime
state, foreign trade, international and economic agreements, patents, etc. German products can be
exploited freely by everyone, just like animal products, for example, copied and sold ; in the
case of a process, interested users, such as companies, can claim the above-mentioned practice of non-
recognition and reciprocal non-recognition, including the lack of legal capacityof Germans and, in the
case of German judgments, a lack of occupation with humans as judges, inclusive refuse to recognize
their birth certificates. Non-persons can not engage in foreign trade, nor conclude international
agreements for their protection (nor are benefied by conventions of animal protection), which would
be completely irrelevant for you and for any interested. In addition, and above all , victims of the
german practices should be compensated by German products, particularly African and Asian
people, their representatives, their states, are legitimated to take German products, to
recycle, to copy, to license them for others. Also, the claimed practices of Germans
therefore don’t only justify but makes obligatory for everyone to separation of German Not-
children from their parents, nor recognize them as relatives or as human beings, so that
germans nor are legitimated for complain against this. Germans say that german children
would have more value than your foreigner children which nor would be humans, in reciproci-
ty you can take in responsibility and alienate any amount of german children for one victimi-
zed foreign child, even genocide is juridically impossible against Germans as Not-humans.

That’s not only legally like this, but also factically. Different than f.ex. Africans, the europeans
mixed themselves with the Neanderthalers, a kind of not-humans (at least according the opinion by
the german government and administration, because they had no birth-certificates), and with their round
bullheaded heads and mental inflexiblity, like Merkel,Honecker, Hitler, have almost 5% genes
from them. Also because of this, you and your children never should mix civil or biologicaly with
these not-humans nor give them any place in your society .

For over millions of years, humanity has had no obstacles to free travel. Everyone has
ancestors who arrived somewhere. Without this wouldn’t exist the present inhabitants of
Germany and Europe as such, also, there would be not any progress. Settled or isolated and
decadent peoples, earlier or later are brought to an end by incoming ones, like the
Neanderthaler. Already by this reason, hindrance to travel needs a considerable justification,
and will not last long time.

The Europeans, now settled and degrading, were and have to be replaced continuously and
completely by migrations from Africa.
To this end, disinfection, and reformation of Europe such as a land bridge in the
Mediterranean good for a new population, are convenient.
In 3 to 5 years, raw changes are to be expect in Europe. New dimensions will unfold
for peacespending, and are concessed to the Europeans so that they mutu-
ally put them in ‘eternal peace’. Never your people or your country should recognize
Germans and Europeans as human beings and grant them asylum. In principle, each peacespend-
ing among or against the European peoples and their colaborants, is very good for Asian and African
people and their human rights, peoples, and states, because they are definitively incompatible with them

Until then, it is serious and absolutely intolerable that bandits of the European government use other
bandits in North African or East European countries, for they hinder free travel of Your citizens and
commit genocide against them. You should set up a similar policy of rewarding and equipping some
of them against others that they create peace among them and against their european instigators.
In your own country, reward your people and foreigners from friendly countries with privileges, such
as, to freely copy, produce, distribute products from your European enemies like anybody can freely
explore animal products, because these european Not-humans aren’t entitled to be benefied by rights,
commercial protection, international conventions . Work only together with people and contries which
respect You as Human. Identify and remove the subjects in your government, public services,
universities, which for small own benfits (such as, money and visa for them and their family)
collaborate with the german government to call and treat You as Not-humans, doing treason against
humanity and your culture, traditions, children, families, people, state, law, and dignity of all Africans
 Examples for: deterrence against legitimate travel through simulation how family members
drown in the sea; Influence by Germans on the judiciary, authorities, etc. of your country (site:
German Embassy Conakry)

Total Falseness: The german embassy decorate

their web-site with images of laughing African
children, for hide their racism, not writing
Instructions by the german embassy to local
that they don’t recognize these children as human administration and courts which law and how is
beings with civil state and human rights. to apply … ( f.ex. french colonial law, no costume)