Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
=22.5 X 10 / 30 =7.5 %
The graph in (Fig.23) illustrates the use of 'discrimination curves', which are
an important aid to satisfactory protection co-ordination. In this example, a
voltage base of 3.3kV has been chosen and the first curve plotted is that of
the 200 A fuse, which is assumed to protect the largest outgoing 3.3kV
circuit. Once the operating characteristic of the highest rated 3.3kV fuse has
been plotted, the grading of the over current relays at the various sub-
stations of the radial system is carried out as follows:
Substation B
CT ratio 250/5A Relay over current characteristic assumed to be extremely
inverse, as for the type CDG 14 relay. This relay must discriminate with the
200A fuse at fault levels up to:
Substation C
CT ratio 500/5A Relay over current characteristic assumed to be extremely
inverse, as for the type CDG 14 relay. This relay must discriminate with the
relay in substation
B at fault levels up to:
That is, 21,500 A at 3.3kV or 538 A at 132 kV. The operating characteristics of
the CDG 14 relay show that at a plug setting of 100%, that is, 150 A and 34.2
MVA at 132 kV and at a time multiplier setting of 0.25, suitable discrimination
with the relay at substation C is achieved.
Substation E
CT ratio 500/1 A Relay over current characteristic assumed to be extremely
inverse, as for the type CDG 14 relay. This relay must discriminate with the
relay
in substation D at fault levels up to:
That is, 270,000 A at 3.3kV or 6750 A at 132 kV. The operating characteristics
of the CDG 14 relay show that at a plug setting of 100%, that is, 500 A and
114 MVA at 132 kV, and at a time multiplier setting of 0.9, suitable
discrimination with the relay at sub-station D is achieved.
A comparison between the relay operating times shown in (Fig. 21) and the
times obtained from the discrimination curves of (Fig. 23) at the maximum
fault level reveals significant differences. These differences can be
summarized as follows:
These figures show that for faults close to the relaying points the inverse
time characteristic can achieve appreciable reductions in fault clearance
times.
Even for faults at the remote ends of the protected sections, reductions in
fault clearance times are still obtained, as shown by the following table:
Relay Fault
level
(Max./Min Time from Average
MVA) Fig.14 time
(seconds) (seconds)
(Max./ Min)
B 98.7/35.7 0.07/0.17 0.12
C 123/98.7 0.33/0.42 0.375
D 1540/123 0.07/0.86 0.465
E 3500/1540 0.25/0.39 0.32
This comparison clearly shows that when there is a large variation in fault
level all along the system network the overall performance of the inverse time
over current relay is far superior to that of the definite over current relay.
4 GRADING MARGIN
The time interval between the operations of two adjacent relays depends
upon a number of factors:
1. The fault current interrupting time of the circuit breaker.
2. The overshoot time of the relay.
3. Errors.
4. Final margin on completion of operation.
B. Overshoot
When the relay is de-energized, operation may continue for a little longer
until any stored energy has been dissipated. For example, an induction disc
relay will have stored kinetic energy in the motion of the disc; static relay
circuits may have energy stored in capacitors. Relay design is directed to
minimizing and absorbing these energies, but some allowance is usually
necessary.
The overshoot time is not the actual time during which some forward
operation takes place, but the time which would have been required by the
relay if still energized to achieve the same amount of operational advance.
C. Errors
All measuring devices such as relays and current transformers are subject to
some degree of error. The operating time characteristic of either or both
relays involved in the grading may have a positive or negative error, as may
the current transformers, which can have phase and ratio errors due to the
exciting current required to magnetize their core. This does not, however,
apply to independent definite time delay over current relays.
Relay grading and setting is carried out assuming the accuracy of the
calibration curves published by manufacturers, but since some error is to be
expected, some tolerance must be allowed.
D. Final margin
After the above allowances have been made, the discriminating relay must
just fail to complete its operation. Some extra allowance, or safety margin, is
required to ensure that a satisfactory contact gap (or equivalent) remains.
E. Recommended time
The total amount to be allowed to cover the above items depends on the
operating speed of the circuit breakers and the relay performance. At one time
0.5s was a normal grading margin. With faster modern circuit breakers and
lower relay overshoot times 0.4s is reasonable, while under the best possible
conditions 0.35s may be feasible.
In some instances, however, rather than using a fixed grading margin, it is
better to adopt a fixed time value, to allow for the operating time of the circuit
breaker and relay overshoot, and to add to it a variable time value that takes
into account the relay errors, the CT errors and the safety margin.
A value of 0.25s is chosen for the fixed time value, made up of 0.1 s for the
fault current interrupting time of the circuit breaker, 0.05s for the relay over-
shoot time and 0.1 s for the safety margin. Considering next the variable time
values required, it is first assumed that each inverse time over current relay
complies with Error Class E7.5 defined as normal British practice in BS
142:1966.
The normal limits of error for an E7.5 relay are ±7.5% but allowance should
also be made for the effects of temperature, frequency, and departure from
reference setting. A practical approximation is to assume a total effective
error of 2 x 7.5, that is, 15%, this to apply to the relay nearest to the fault,
which shall be considered to be slow.
To this total effective error for the relay a further 10% should be added for the
overall current transformer error. Hence, for the time interval t' required
between inverse time over current relays it is proposed to adopt the
equation:
All this must be obtained without detriment to the general performance of the
relay; in other words, there must be no reduction in the operating torque or
weakening of the damper magnets or contact pressures, and the construction
must remain simple with the minimum number of moving parts. While these
requirements present considerable difficulties in manufacture, owing to
variations in materials and practical tolerances, the progress made in the GEC
Measurements relays has made it possible to discriminate more closely by
reducing the margin between both the current and the time setting of the
relays on adjacent breakers.
Previous Next