Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Pharmacologic Treatment of
Erectile Dysfunction
William D. Steers, MD
Department of Urology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
E
rectile dysfunction (ED) is a pervasive disorder that afflicts as many as 30
million men in the United States.1 Yet only 6 million men seek medical
attention and even fewer undergo therapy. Only 4.2 million men receive a
medication for ED (Gallup Marketing Survey Information, 2001 [unpublished
data]). Though 3.8 million prescriptions for the drug sildenafil were filled in the
year 2000, fewer than 2.2 million men continue this drug.
Potential reasons for discontinua- pharmacokinetics, and side effects, nerves release at least three neuro-
tion of pharmacologic therapy but an equal amount of attention transmitters that are capable of relax-
include lack of efficacy, side effects, needs be given to the overall man- ing the cavernous smooth muscle4
possible deterioration of underlying agement of the patient to allow such (Figure 1). These transmitters include
disease, psychogenic factors, and therapies to deliver the optimal out- nitric oxide (NO), acetylcholine (ACh),
partner issues. Although, in general, comes that they are capable of pro- and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide
response rates to sildenafil are high, viding. This review will discuss the (VIP), of which NO is the most
depending on the underlying cause mechanisms whereby the categories important.
of ED, up to 20%–40% of patients of agents currently available or The cavernous nerves contain neu-
may fail to respond to the phospho- potentially useful for the treatment ronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS).
diesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibition, of ED influence penile erection. In nerves, nNOS synthesizes NO from
and one recent report based on a L-arginine.5 NO is released following
limited telephonic survey suggests Pharmacology of Erection action potential propagation along
that 10%–27% of men may need to Penile erection is the result of the cavernous nerve. Transgenic mice
increase the dose of sildenafil to increased blood flow to the penis, with a deletion for part of the gene
maintain effectiveness over time, relaxation of cavernous smooth mus- for nNOS remain potent, probably as
and 12% of men discontinue this cle, and restriction of venous outflow a result of the remaining isoforms for
medication for “lack of efficacy” with- from the corpus cavernosum.4 The nNOS.6 In contrast, mice deficient for
in 2 years. However, it remains uncer- vascular events governing penile cyclic guanidine monophosphate
tain if this is due to loss of efficacy erection rely on parasympathetic (cGMP)–dependent kinase I, or protein
or inadequate follow-up or control of neural input derived from cholinergic kinase G (PKG), fail to achieve penile
underlying disease, because in con- preganglionic neurons residing with- erection and reproduce.7 PKG is
trolled clinical studies discontinua- in the sacral (S2–S4) spinal cord. responsible for the signal transduc-
tion rates due to insufficient clinical Parasympathetic input to the penis tion events leading to a lowering of
response over 2–3 years are reported occurs in response to visual, auditory, cytosolic calcium (Ca+2).
as being only 2.1%.2 Only 1%–3% of olfactory, imaginative, and tactile NO activates soluble guanylate
men discontinue sildenafil because stimuli. The cavernous nerves arise cyclase within the cavernous smooth
of side effects.3 Thus, current phar- from the pelvic nerves that exit the muscle cell, leading to a rise in
macological treatment for ED can be sacral spinal cord and supply auto- cGMP. The rise in cGMP produces a
improved upon with regard to efficacy, nomic input to the penis. These fall in cytosolic Ca+2 and relaxation
of cavernous smooth muscle. In addi- age-gated channels) can relax cav- activation of 1-adrenergic receptors
tion, NO may reduce norepinephrine ernous smooth muscle and trigger (Figure 1). Based on receptor protein
(NE) release from noradrenergic penile erection. Potassium channels levels, the penis contains 1A-, 1B-,
nerves.8 In the penis, the actions of influence the basal tone of cavernous and 2A-adrenergic receptors in
cGMP are curtailed primarily by smooth muscle, the initiation and blood vessels and smooth muscle. NE
PDE-5.9 This enzyme can exist as termination of contractile events, and released from sympathetic fibers
three isoforms in the human penis; relaxation because of their ability to coursing within cavernous nerves
the mRNA for PDE-5A is the most hyperpolarize the cell (Figure 2). and the dorsal nerve of the penis
prevalent.10 At least 12 other PDEs Hyperpolarization of corpus caver- inhibits erection.4 Local autocrine
have been discovered.11 PDE-5 nosum prevents the influx of extra- factors such as prostaglandins and
inhibitors prolong the action of cellular Ca+2. Opening of two types of endothelins (ETs) also contract cav-
cGMP, thereby amplifying the NO K+ channels in the penis, KATP and ernous smooth muscle. The actions of
signal.5 This enhances events leading large-conductance calcium-activated ETs on cavernous smooth muscle are
to penile erection. Competitive PDE-5 potassium (maxi K), hyperpolarizes probably mediated by ET-B recep-
inhibitors, such as sildenafil and var- the cavernous smooth muscle cell tors.14 The roles of ETs remain to be
denafil, structurally resemble cGMP. and results in relaxation. The most elucidated. These substances may
PDE-5 is also found in other tissues, physiologically relevant channel is influence smooth muscle contractility
including the anal sphincter, gastroe- the KCa, or maxi-K, channel. Cross either directly or by modulating the
sophageal junction, and urethra.11 talk between NO/cGMP pathways effects of other substances such as NE.
PDE-5 inhibitors may also influence and KCa or Ca+2 channels may exist. ETs may also influence the growth
noradrenergic tone in the penis via Penile erection also occurs through and proliferation of smooth muscle.
the effects of NO on nerve terminals. inhibition of contractile mecha- Increased cavernous smooth muscle
Efferent fibers within the cavernous nisms.13 Contraction of cavernous tone mediated by NE and ET is the
nerves also contain ACh and VIP smooth muscle by NE is the result of consequence of a rise in cytosolic
(Figure 1). ACh activates endothelium
via muscarinic receptors of the M3
Figure 2. Electromechanical mechanisms influencing cavernous smooth muscle tone. Opening of Ca +2-gated potassium
subtype.4 Binding to M3 receptors (Kca) channels results in hyperpolarization of smooth muscle. This prevents extracellular Ca+2 influx. A reduction in Ca+2
on endothelium leads to production results in relaxation of cavernous smooth muscle. Recent electrophysiology experiments suggest that NO may influence
K channels as well as Ca+2 influx through L-type Ca+2 channels.
of NO, which is synthesized by
endothelial NOS (eNOS).12 VIP, as
well as forskolin, papaverine, and
prostaglandin E1, acts through Nitric
adenylate cyclase to trigger a rise in oxide
cyclic adenosine monophosphate
(cAMP).5 A rise in cAMP, like a rise in
cGMP, results in a fall in cytosolic Ca+2 Soluble
in cavernous smooth muscle. This fall Guanylate
in cytosolic Ca+2 triggers relaxation of cyclase
cavernous smooth muscle. In the penis,
PDE-3 and 4 degrade primarily cAMP.
These PDEs are also present in the G-kinase G-kinase
myocardium. Not surprisingly, use of KCa channel cGMP L-type Ca+2
selective inhibitors for PDE-3 and
(Maxi K) channel
PDE-4 in the treatment of ED is lim-
ited by cardiovascular side effects.11
Pharmacomechanical (receptor- Cai+2
mediated) mechanisms that raise Open/raise
either cGMP or cAMP, causing a fall
in Ca+2, are of potential use in treating Close/lower
ED. In addition, drugs acting through
electromechanical mechanisms (volt-
C3
SR PKC raise cGMP, 2) raise cAMP, 3) prevent
Rho-kinase IP3 formation, or 4) inhibit Rho
Ca2+ ATP kinase can initiate or facilitate penile
ATP
Block
cavernous injection of PGE1.34 The lished. Sodium nitroprusside has may work primarily through its meta-
drug acts through P-receptor stimu- been associated with severe hypoten- bolic by-product, meta-chlorophenyl
lation. It is metabolized in the penis sion when given intracavernously. piperazine (mCPP). mCPP is a 5-HT2C
to PGE0, which is also biologically Oral/sublingual agents. Oral agents receptor agonist. Trazodone in open-
active. The actions of PGE1 and PGE0 of dubious effectiveness have been label trials showed some efficacy in
are mediated by adenylate cyclase, used for decades in the treatment of sexual performance.41 However, when
which causes a rise in cAMP. PGE1 ED. Among the earliest drugs used placebo-controlled clinical trials were
alone is more effective than moxisy- was yohimbine, an 2-adrenergic- performed, little if any improvement
lyte alone (71% vs 50% responders). receptor antagonist. Yohimbine pos- in erectile function or sexual perform-
ance was documented.42 Regardless,
trazodone enhances the duration of
Oral agents of dubious effectiveness have been used for decades in the nocturnal erections. Thus, this agent
treatment of ED. may be useful not to treat sexual
dysfunction but as an alternative for
antidepressant-induced ED.
PGE1 can be effective in men with sesses little efficacy for the treatment The most important advance in the
severe vasculogenic impotence. of ED.38 treatment of ED has been the devel-
The combination of PGE1 with S- Phentolamine has had mixed opment of oral PDE-5 inhibitors.
nitrosoglutathione (SNO-GLU) had results when given orally to treat This class of drug is exemplified by
some degree of synergy, but it is ED.13 Initial clinical trials failed to sildenafil. Interestingly, caffeine is a
unclear whether this represents show any significant efficacy. weak PDE-5 inhibitor. Anecdotal
greater efficacy than that of PGE1 However, with a reformulated prepa- reports even suggest caffeine improves
alone.35 As mentioned previously, VIP ration enabling rapid onset, phento- erectile function.43 Sildenafil and
is released from parasympathetic lamine demonstrated some efficacy other PDE-5 inhibitors inhibit
nerves within the penis. Like PGE1, over placebo in patients with mild to PDE-5 at very low concentrations.
intracavernous VIP stimulates adeny- moderate ED.3 It is unclear whether Sildenafil and two agents currently
late cyclase production, causing this agent will be resurrected for FDA in phase II clinical trials, vardenafil
penile erection.5 VIP as a single approval for treatment of ED within and tadalafil, inhibit PDE-5 at different
agent results in poor-quality erec- the United States. concentrations (Table 2).11 Sildenafil
tions. However, when it is combined Chronic injection of narcotics and vardenafil bind to cGMP, thereby
with papaverine and phentolamine, leads to decreased libido and impo- blocking the PDE-5–mediated catalyt-
the triple drug mixture is effective in tence. Thus, it is not surprising that ic mechanism that dephosphorylates
over 81% of patients. This VIP/phen- sporadic reports suggest that opiate and breaks down cGMP. In contrast,
tolamine/papaverine mixture is report- receptor antagonists, such as nalox- tadalafil is structurally distinct from
ed to cause less penile pain, fibrosis,
or priapism than phentolamine or
papaverine alone.22 A two-drug mix- Anecdotal reports even suggest caffeine improves erectile function.
ture of VIP and phentolamine has
also been used therapeutically.
Calcitonin gene-related peptide one or naltrexone, demonstrate some sildenafil and vardenafil and may
(CGRP) is found within afferent usefulness for ED. Two small studies inhibit PDE-5 by a slightly different
nerves of the penis. Intracavernous with naloxone, only one of which mechanism. Selectivity for the differ-
CGRP also raises cAMP and produces was placebo controlled, noted a small ent PDEs varies among these three
penile erection.36 However, minimal increase in sexual performance.5 In agents. Vardenafil has the highest
clinical data are available. two randomized placebo-controlled selectivity for PDE-5. Subtle phar-
Linsidomine chlorohydrate is an studies, naltrexone was shown to macokinetic differences in PDE-5
NO donor. Along with sodium nitro- increase early morning erections or inhibitors may influence clinical use,
prusside, it has been injected intra- enhance sexual activity.39,40 yet efficacy is likely to be very simi-
cavernously and found to produce Similar contradictory results have lar among these drugs. The efficacy
penile erection.37 However, some been seen with the use of the atypical of PDE-5 inhibitors varies from 40%
contradicting reports have been pub- antidepressant trazodone. Trazodone to 85% depending on the severity
Main Points
• Erectile dysfunction (ED) afflicts as many as 30 million men in the United States.
• Many men do not respond to sildenafil; lack of efficacy is a much more common reason for discontinuation than side effects.
• Nitric oxide (NO) is the most important of the neurotransmitters released by the cavernous nerves that relax cavernous smooth
muscle, triggering penile erection.
• ED is significantly more common in men with diabetes, atherosclerosis, or high cholesterol; smoking, injury, and castrate levels
of testosterone are also risk factors.
• Many types of drugs, including phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors, -adrenergic receptors, and adenylate cyclase activators, have
been used to treat ED, with varying degrees of success.
• Drugs under development for ED include free radical scavengers, NO substrates, direct activators of guanylate cyclase, Rho kinase
inhibitors, and fusion compounds.
G-proteins, Rho-kinase and protein phos- dysfunction another manifestation of vascular 37. Truss MC, Becker AJ, Djamilian MH, et al. Role
phatase to smooth muscle and non-muscle disease? Cardiovasc Res. 1999;43:658–665. of the nitric oxide donor linsidomine chlorhy-
myosin II. J Physiol. 2000;522(pt 2):177–185. 28. Moody JA, Vernet D, Laidlaw S, et al. Effects of drate (SIN-1) in the diagnosis and treatment of
17. Chitaley K, Webb RC, Mills TM. RhoA/Rho- long-term oral administration of L-arginine on erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1994;44:553–556.
kinase: a novel player in the regulation of the rat erectile response. J Urol. 1997;158(3 pt 38. Morales A. Yohimbine in erectile dysfunction:
penile erection. Int J Impot Res. 2001;13:67–72. 1):942–947. would an orphan drug ever be properly
18. Chitaley K, Wingard CJ, Clinton Webb R, et al. 29. Azadzoi KM, Goldstein I, Siroky MB, et al. assessed? World J Urol. 2001;19:251-255.
Antagonism of Rho-kinase stimulates rat penile Mechanisms of ischemia-induced cavernosal 39. Sathe RS, Komisaruk BR, Ladas AK, Godbole
erection via a nitric oxide-independent path- smooth muscle relaxation impairment in a rab- SV. Naltrexone-induced augmentation of sexu-
way. Nat Med. 2001;7:119–122. bit model of vasculogenic erectile dysfunction. al response in men. Arch Med Res.
19. Bivalacqua TJ, Hellstrom WJ. Potential applica- J Urol. 1998;160(6 pt 1):2216–2222. 2001;32:221–226.
tion of gene therapy for the treatment of erec- 30. Xie Y, Garban H, Ng C, Rajfer J, Gonzalez- 40. Brennemann W, Stitz B, Van Ahlen H, et al.
tile dysfunction. J Androl. 2000;22:183–190. Cadavid NF. Effect of long-term passive smok- Treatment of idiopathic erectile dysfunction in
20. Purvis K, Egdetveit I, Christiansen E. ing on erectile function and penile nitric oxide men with the opiate antagonist naltrexone--a
Intracavernosal therapy for erectile failure— synthase in the rat. J Urol. 1997;157:1121–1126. double-blind study. J Androl. 1993;14:407–410.
impact of treatment and reasons for drop-out 31. Lugg J, Ng C, Rajfer J, Gonzalez-Cadavid N. 41. Lance R, Albo M, Costabile R, Steers WD. Oral
and dissatisfaction. Int J Impot Res. Cavernosal nerve stimulation in the rat revers- trazodone as empirical therapy for erectile dys-
1999;11:287–299. es castration-induced decrease in penile NOS function. Urology. 1995;46:117–120.
21. Padma-Nathan H, Giuliano F. Oral drug thera- activity. Am J Physiol. 1996;271(2 pt 42. Enzlin P, Vanderschueren D, Bonte L, et al.
py for erectile dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am. 1):E354–E361. Trazodone: a double-blind, placebo-controlled,
2001;28:321–334. 32. Buvat J, Lemaire A, Herbaut-Buvat M. randomized study of its effects in patients with
22. Leungwattanakij S, Flynn V Jr, Hellstrom WJ. Intracavernous pharmacotherapy: comparison erectile dysfunction without major organic
Intracavernosal injection and intraurethral of moxisylyte and prostaglandin E1. Int J Impot findings. Int J Impot Res. 2000;12:223–228.
therapy for erectile dysfunction. Urol Clin Res. 1996;8:41–46. 43. Kongkanand A. Prevalence of erectile dysfunc-
North Am. 2000;28:343–354. 33. Buvat-Herbaut M, Lemaire A, Marcolin G. tion in Thailand. Thai Erectile Dysfunction
23. Ferrini M, Magee TR, Vernet D, et al. Aging- Treatment of impotence with intracavernous Epidemiological Study Group. Int J Androl.
related expression of inducible nitric oxide syn- auto-injections: moxisylyte diminishes the risks 2000;23(suppl 2):77-80.
thase and markers of tissue damage in the rat compared to papaverine [in French]. Fertilité 44. McCullough AR, Siegel RL, Shpilsky AB.
penis. Biol Reprod. 2001;64:974–982. Contraception Sexualité. 1993;21:173–176. Intercourse success rates with sildenafil citrate
24. Ledda A. Diabetes, hypertension and erectile 34. Purvis K, Egdetveit I, Christiansen E. [abstract 699]. J Urol. 2001;165(suppl):170.
dysfunction. Curr Med Res Opin. 2000;16(suppl Intracavernosal therapy for erectile failure— 45. Pomerantz SM. Quinelorane (LY163502), a D2
1):S17–S20. impact of treatment and reasons for drop-out dopamine receptor agonist, acts centrally to facil-
25. de Tejada I, Goldstein I, Azadzoi K, et al. and dissatisfaction [see comments]. Int J Impot itate penile erections of male rhesus monkeys.
Impaired neurogenic and endothelium-mediat- Res. 1999;11:287–299. Pharmacol, Biochem Behav. 1991;39:123–128.
ed relaxation of penile smooth muscle from 35. Angulo J, Cuevas P, Moncada I, et al. Rationale 46. Dula E, Bukofzer S, Perdok R, et al. Double-blind,
diabetic men with impotence. N Engl J Med. for the combination of PGE(1) and S-nitroso- crossover comparison of 3 mg apomorphine SL
1989;320:1025–1030. glutathione to induce relaxation of human with placebo and with 4 mg apomorphine SL
26. Vernet D, Cai L, Garban H, et al. Reduction of penile smooth muscle. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. in male erectile dysfunction. Eur Urol.
penile nitric oxide synthase in diabetic 2000;295:586–593. 2001;39:558–553; discussion, 564.
BB/WORdp (type I) and BBZ/WORdp (type II) 36. Truss MC, Becker AJ, Thon WF, et al. 47. Wessells H, Levine N, Hadley ME, et al.
rats with erectile dysfunction. Endocrinology. Intracavernous calcitonin gene-related peptide Melanocortin receptor agonists, penile erection,
1995;136:5709–5717. plus prostaglandin E1: possible alternative to and sexual motivation: human studies with
27. Sullivan ME, Thompson CS, Dashwood MR, et penile implants in selected patients. Eur Urol. Melanotan II. Int J Impot Res. 2000;12(suppl
al. Nitric oxide and penile erection: is erectile 1994;26:40–45. 4):S74–S79.
Summary of Discussion Following gle formulation. The more compli- only a third of hypertensive patients
Dr. Steers’s Presentation cated we make the song and dance are adequately controlled with mono-
Dr. Steers summed up the salient around creating the erection, the less therapy. In the motivated patient for
point of his presentation as these: likely it is that the patient is going to whom one drug is not working, there
First, current pharmacologic therapy pursue that form of therapy." Steers would be a high motivation for com-
is primarily based on peripheral agreed, but countered that if the bined therapy.
mechanisms, and future agents may patient is not satisfied with the It is important, Steers continued,
be acting with the central nervous results of a single formulation, he to not forget financial issues.
system. Second, combination therapy might take the combination to “get Combining two different agents with
may someday be exploited in certain something done." The paradigm for a comparable pricing scheme today
patient groups to enhance efficacy. such combination therapy, Steers would result in a cost of $40 or $50
Dr. McCullough protested, “But said, would be anti-hypertensive and for an erection. That might, he said,
clearly it’s going to have to be a sin- anti-depressive therapy. Currently be a good reason to combine agents.