Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Abstract
Catalytic combustion of low heating value (LHV) fuels from gasification of biomasses has attracted attention in recent years
in order to reduce net CO2 emissions in the atmosphere. A European project, ULECAT, has been undertaken to investigate this
matter along with combustion of diesel fuel since 1996. This paper describes part of the work performed in the mathematical
modelling task of this project in connection with the analysis of atmospheric pilot scale experiments.
Simulation results obtained with a single channel 2D model of the monolith catalyst are presented and compared with
experimental results obtained in an atmospheric pilot scale facility. From this analysis a quantitative description of the role
of the different governing phenomena in determining the combustor performance is derived and discussed to provide insight
into the catalyst behaviour under severe conditions. The most critical parameters in the simulations are also identified and
discussed. © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Catalytic combustors; Gasified biomass; Pilot scale tests; Mathematical modelling; Monolith catalysts
0920-5861/00/$ – see front matter © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 9 2 0 - 5 8 6 1 ( 0 0 ) 0 0 2 8 0 - 7
152 G. Groppi et al. / Catalysis Today 59 (2000) 151–162
Table 1
Gas from gasification of wood and synthetic model gas mixture resembling the composition of the gasified biomass
CO (vol.%) CO2 (vol.%) H2 (vol.%) H2 O (vol.%) N2 (vol.%) CH4 (vol.%) C2 H4 (vol.%) LHV (MJ/mn3 )
Gasification gas 15.4 11.8 12.6 10.0 47.1 2.6 0.4 4.5
Synthetic model gas 14.7 13.8 9.9 11.2 44.8 4.6 1.0 5.1
CH4 ). Fuels from gasification of biomasses are quite simulation results of a 2D model of single channel of
complex mixtures mainly consisting of CO, H2 , CH4 the monolith catalyst are presented in comparison with
and, to a minor but significant extent, C2 H4 as the experimental data. The aim of the work is the quanti-
major combustible components along with gasifica- tative description of the role of the different governing
tion byproducts, CO2 and H2 O, and N2 coming from phenomena in determining the combustor performance
gasification air. Besides minor amounts of tars, N- and in order to provide insight into the catalyst behaviour
S-containing compounds (mostly NH3 and H2 S) are under severe conditions. The most critical parameters
present which can markedly affect NOx formation and in the simulations are also identified and discussed.
catalyst performance.
Under actual, pressurized (10–20 atm) conditions
either transitional (laminar to turbulent) or turbulent 2. Experimental
regimes typically prevail in the channels of GT mono-
lith combustors due to the extremely high specific flow Pilot scale experiments have been performed in an
rates. On the other hand, many pilot scale facilities, atmospheric facility which is described in detail in a
including the one developed in the ULECAT project, companion paper [4]. The experimental set up con-
operate at atmospheric pressure. This typically corre- sists of a 30 kW, airblown, bubbling fluidized bed con-
sponds to the laminar flow regime prevailing in the nected to a combustor rig with an inner diameter of
channels. In this latter case, and particularly in the 78 mm. The gasifier is fed with wood chips. The av-
presence of H2 -containing mixtures with high homo- erage composition of the fuel gas, after cleaning from
geneous reactivity and widely different diffusion rates particles in a cyclone and high temperature particu-
of the fuel components, the use of distributed models late filters, is reported in Table 1. The schematic of
is preferable to that of lumped ones, which may result the combustor rig is shown in Fig. 1. The pilot op-
in misleading predictions of heterogeneous and ho- erates under essentially adiabatic combustion condi-
mogeneous ignitions and of gas–solid heat and mass tions. The fuel gas is mixed with combustion air, which
transfer [2,3]. is electrically heated to enable the experiments to be
In this work analysis of the results obtained in the performed with different inlet temperatures between
mathematical model of an atmospheric pilot combus- 150 and 500◦ C. After mixing between the fuel gas and
tor fuelled by gasified biomasses is presented. The the combustion air, the mixture enters the combustion
chamber and reaches the catalyst section. The diameter Due to the small scale of the gasifier, even minor
of the catalyst monoliths is 77 mm. One or several cat- fluctuations in the fuel feeding rate had a direct ef-
alyst segments can be sequentially included. The total fect on both the amount and the quality of the fuel
length of the combustion and mixing chamber from gas fed to the gasifier. The average heating value of
centre of the air pipe to the last catalyst is 1800 mm. this gas was 4.5 MJ/N m3 but, due to the fluctuations
The distance from the primary air flange to the outlet in the fuel feeding rate, the heating value varied ±3%
of the last catalyst can be varied but for all the exper- around this value. The flow rate of the fuel gas also
iments which are reported in this paper, the distance had a variation of ±3% around the mean value with
was 1600 mm in order to achieve a good mixing qual- the higher flow rate corresponding to the higher heat-
ity. Typically, deviations of the inlet concentrations ing value, thus both contributing to a higher fuel to air
from the mean value <1% have been measured. ratio and adiabatic temperature rise, since the combus-
Temperature measurements have been performed tion air was kept constant. This results in scattering of
using one K-type thermocouple placed just upstream the experimental data. In particular strong simultane-
from the catalyst section and three thermocouples ous fluctuations have been observed for all the mea-
placed in the channels of the last catalyst segment at sured temperatures in the last catalyst segments that
different axial and radial positions. In order to min- make difficult the analysis of T-profile data. However,
imize the contribution of the homogeneous reaction preliminary analysis of the emission trends showed
downstream from the catalyst section, the sampling that scattering is markedly smoothened by plotting the
probe for the gas analysis was positioned 10 mm experimental outlet concentrations of CO and THC
from the exit of the last catalyst segment. Analysis of versus the temperatures measured in the centre line of
CO and total hydrocarbons (THC) was performed by the last catalyst segments.
means of IR and FID, respectively.
Several catalyst configurations have been tested
[4]. In this paper attention has been focused to two 3. Model development
of them both consisting of one Pd-based catalyst
segment followed by two Mn-substituted hexaalumi- Based on the assumption of negligible heat disper-
nates (HA) segments. Both configurations adopted sion and uniform distribution of variables at the inlet
the same Pd-based catalyst, prepared by deposition sections, a single channel description has been adopted
on a cordierite monolith of a washcoat consisting for the monolith catalyst.
of Pd supported on La-hexaaluminate. On the other Ceramic honeycombs are typically extruded with
hand, different HA segments have been used in the square cells, but washcoat deposition results in corner
two configurations, namely extruded commercial HA rounding due to accumulation in the angles [5] and
catalysts and washcoated cordierite home made cat- the actual geometry of the cross-section of a monolith
alysts. Data on the characteristics of the different cell is in between square and circular. In a preliminary
segments are reported in Table 2. study, a 2D description was found to provide similar
Table 2
Description of the simulated catalyst configurations (diameter 77 mm; length 2.3×3 cm)
Segment No. Catalyst type CPSI Void fraction Washcoat thickness (m)
Configuration 1
1 Washcoated Pd-catalyts 200/12 0.589 62
2 Commercial HA 250/17 0.513 Bulk
3 Commercial HA 250/17 0.513 Bulk
Configuration 2
1 Washcoated Pd-catalyts 200/12 0.589 62
2 Washcoated HA 400/6.5 0.64 40
3 Washcoated HA 400/6.5 0.64 40
154 G. Groppi et al. / Catalysis Today 59 (2000) 151–162
Table 3
Typically, five radial collocation points and nine axial
Simulation parameters for catalytic kinetics and operating condi-
nodes are required to achieve numerical convergence, tions
corresponding to 746 equations.
Catalytic kinetics ri =Ki Ci (mol/cm3 s)
Table 4
Homogeneous reaction kineticsa
Species Rate expression (mol/cm3 s) Pre-exponential factor Eact (cal/mol)
Fig. 8. Comparison of total (open symbols) and homogeneous combustion (solid symbols) conversion profiles calculated for CH4 and CO.
6. Nomenclature
ρ density (kg/m3 ) [4] M. Berg, E.M. Johansson, S.G. Jaras, Catal. Today 59 (2000)
σ Stefan–Boltzmann constant 117.
(5.67×10−8 W/m2 K4 ) [5] D. Leung, R.E. Hayes, S.T. Kolaczkowski, Can. J. Chem.
Eng. 74 (1996) 94.
ξ active washcoat fraction [6] G. Groppi, A. Belloli, E. Tronconi, P. Forzatti, AIChE J. 41
(1995) 2250.
Superscripts and subscripts [7] F.L. Dryier, I. Glassmann, in: Proceedings of the 14th
g gas phase International Symposium on Combustion, Vol. 987, The
Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 1972.
het heterogeneous reaction
[8] T. Mitani, F.A. Williams, Combust. Flame 39 (1980) 169.
hom homogeneous reaction [9] B. Finlayson, Nonlinear Analysis in Chemical Engineering,
0 inlet conditions McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
s inert support [10] L.C. Young, B.A. Finlayson, AIChE J. 22 (1976) 331.
w active washcoat [11] G. Groppi, E. Tronconi, Chem. Eng. Sci. 55 (2000) 2161.
[12] T.C. Wayburn, J.D. Seader, Comp. Chem. Eng. 11 (1987)
7.
[13] H. Kleykamp, Z. Physik. Chem. N.F. 71 (1970) 142.
Acknowledgements [14] R.J. Farrauto, M.C. Hobson, T. Kennelly, E.M. Waterman,
Appl. Catal. A 81 (1992) 227.
This work has been performed under UE contract [15] R.A. Dalla Betta, N. Ezawa, K. Tsurumi, J.C. Schlatter, S.G.
Nickolas, US Patent 5 183 401, 2 February 1993.
JOR3-CT96-0071. The authors wish to thank Prof.
[16] P. Forzatti, G. Groppi, Catal. Today (and references therein),
Tiziano Faravelli of Politecnico di Milano for his as- 54 (1999) 165.
sistance on homogeneous combustion rates. [17] G. Groppi, L. Lietti E. Tronconi, P. Forzatti, Catal. Today 45
(1998) 159.
[18] I. Glassmann, Combustion, 3rd Edition, Academic Press, New
References York, 1994.
[19] E. Ranzi, A. Sogaro P. Gaffuri, G. Pennati, T. Faravelli,
[1] R.E. Hayes, S.T. Kolaczkowski, Introduction to Catalytic Combust. Sci. Technol. 95 (1994) 1.
Combustion, Gordon and Breach, London, 1997. [20] R.A. Dalla Betta, D.G. Loffler, Heterogeneous hydrocarbon
[2] G. Groppi, E. Tronconi, P. Forzatti, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. oxidation, ACS Symp. Ser. 638 (1996) 36.
41 (2) (1999) 227. [21] M. Machida, K. Eguchi, H. Arai, J. Catal. 103 (1987) 385.
[3] G. Groppi, A. Belloli, E. Tronconi, P. Forzatti, Chem. Eng. [22] G. Groppi, M. Bellotto, C. Cristiani, P. Forzatti, P.L. Villa,
Sci. 50 (1995) 2705. Appl. Catal. A 104 (1993) 101.