Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
INTERPRETATION
The above table that can be analyze that the 50 % of the respondent are male and 50 % of the
respondent are female.
CHART 4.1
Age
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
18-25years 17 17.0 17.0 17.0
26;35years 17 17.0 17.0 34.0
36;45years 17 17.0 17.0 51.0
46;55years 17 17.0 17.0 68.0
Valid
56;65years 16 16.0 16.0 84.0
above65year 16 16.0 16.0 100.0
s
Total 100 100.0 100.0
INTERPRETATION
The above table that can be analyze that the 17% of the respondent are aged between
the18-25 years , 17% of the respondent are aged between the 26-35years, 17% of the
respondent and36-45 years, 17 % of the respondent are aged between 46-55 years, 16% of the
respondent are aged between 56-65 years, 16% of the respondent are aged between 65 years
age above
CHART 4.2
INTERPRETATION
The above table that can be analyze that the graduate 50% of the respondent 50% of the
respondent are qualified that post graduate.
CHART 4.3
INTERPRETATION
The above table that can be analyze that the 33% of the respondent are employees
33% of the respondent are infrastructure and 33% of the respondent are technology.
CHART 4.4
INTERPRETATION
The above table that can be analyze that the yes 50 % of the respondent are agree with
estimation of different quality control method and 50% of the respondent are disagree with
estimation of different quality control methods.
CHART 4.5
INTERPRETATION
The above table that can be analyze that the yes 50 % of the respondent are agree with
implementation of organisation of the respondent and 50% of the respondent are disagree
with implementation of organisation .
CHART 4.6
professionalrelation
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
Yes 50 50.0 50.0 50.0
Valid No 50 50.0 50.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0 100.0
INTERPRETATION
The above table that can be analyze that the yes 50 % of the respondent are agree
with professional relation of the respondent of the respondent and 50% of the respondent are
disagree with professional relation .
CHART 4.7
INTERPRETATION
The above table that can be analyze that the yes 50 % of the respondent are agree with
organisation structure 50% of the respondent are disagree with organisation structure.
CHART 4.8
INTERPRETATION
The above table that can be analyze that the 50 % of the respondent are agree with trade
unions necessary 50% of the respondent are disagree with trade unions necessary.
CHART 4.9
INTERPRETATION:
The above tables show that the preventative of employee are 24% of the respondents
are says that highly satisfied, 20% of the respondents are says that satisfied, 20% of the
respondents are says that neutral, 14% of the respondents are says that dissatisfied, 22% of
the respondents are says that highly dissatisfied.
CHART 4.10
INTERPRETATION:
The above tables show that the productive of employee are 24% of the respondents
are says that highly satisfied, 20% of the respondents are says that satisfied, 15% of the
respondents are says that neutral, 12% of the respondents are says that dissatisfied, 29% of
the respondents are says that highly dissatisfied
CHART 4.11
CHART SHOWING TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE OF THE
RESPONDENT
.
TABLE 4.12
TABLE SHOWING REDUCTIONAND PRILIMINARY
Preliminary
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
16 15.0 16.0 16.0
Highly Satisfied
INTERPRETATION:
The above tables show that the preliminary of employee are 16% of the respondents
are says that highly satisfied, 17% of the respondents are says that satisfied, 22% of the
respondents are says that neutral, 15% of the respondents are says that dissatisfied, 30% of
the respondents the highly dissatisfied
CHART 4.12
CHART SHOWING REDUCTIONAND PRILIMINARY OF THE RESPONDENT
TABLE 4.13
Series
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
INTERPRETATION:
The above tables show that the Series of employee are 18% of the respondents are
says that highly satisfied, 16% of the respondents are says that satisfied, 26% of the
respondents are says that neutral, 17% of the respondents are says that dissatisfied, 23% of
the respondents are says that highly dissatisfied.
CHART 4.13
INTERPRETATION:
The above tables show that the plant Layout of employee are 20% of the respondents
are says that highly satisfied, 14% of the respondents are says that satisfied, 25% of the
respondents are says that neutral, 16% of the respondents are says that dissatisfied, 25% of
the respondents are says that highly dissatisfied.
CHART 4.14
CHART SHOWING MANUFACTURING PLANT LAYOUT OF THE RESPONDENT
TABLE 4.15
Workingprocess
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
INTERPRETATION:
The above tables show that the working process of employee are 21% of the
respondents are says that highly satisfied, 16% of the respondents are says that satisfied, 27%
of the respondents are says that neutral, 15% of the respondents are says that dissatisfied,
21% of the respondents are says that highly dissatisfied.
CHART 4.15
INTERPRETATION:
The above tables show that the Talk time of employee are 23% of the respondents are
says that highly satisfied, 15% of the respondents are says that satisfied, 18% of the
respondents are says that neutral, 16% of the respondents are says that dissatisfied, 28% of
the respondents the highly dissatisfy
CHART 4.16
INTERPRETATION:
The above tables show that the Equipment of employee are 21% of the respondents
are says that highly satisfied, 22% of the respondents are says that satisfied, 18% of the
respondents are says that neutral, 16% of the respondents are says that dissatisfied, 23% of
the respondent are says that highly dissatisfied.
CHART 4.17
CHART SHOWING OVERALL EQUIPMENT EFFIENCY OF THE
RESPONDENT
TABLE 4.18
TABLE SHOWING DIMAND DRIVEN SUPPLY CHAIN OF THE RESPONDENT
Supplychain
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
24 22.4 24.0 24.0
Highly Satisfied
INTERPRETATION:
The above tables show that the Supply chain of employee are 24% of the respondents
are says that highly satisfied, 17% of the respondents are says that satisfied, 24% of the
respondents are says that neutral, 13% of the respondents are says that dissatisfied, 22% of
the respondents are says that highly dissatisfied
CHART 4.18
CHART SHOWING DIMAND DRIVEN SUPPLY CHAIN OF THE RESPONDENT
TABLE 4.19
INTERPRETATION:
The above tables show that the Procurement of employee are 19% of the respondents
are says that highly satisfied, 18% of the respondents are says that satisfied, 30% of the
respondents are says that neutral, 17% of the respondents are says that dissatisfied, 16% of
the respondents are says that highly dissatisfied.
CHART 4.19
CHART SHOWING LEAN PROCUREMENT OF THE RESPONDENT
TABLE 4.20
TABLE SHOWING REDUCING COST OF PRODUCTION OF THE RESPONDENT
Kaizen
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Technology 30 28.0 30.0 30.0
Employees 25 23.4 25.0 55.0
Infrastructure 18 16.8 18.0 73.0
Valid
27 25.2 27.0 100.0
Health and safety
INTERPRETATION:
The above tables show that the Kaizen of employee are 30% of the respondents are
technology, 25% of the respondents Employee, 18% of the respondents Infrastructure, 17%
of the respondents Health and Safety.
CHART 4.20
CHART SHOWING REDUCING COST OF PRODUCTION OF THE
RESPONDENT
TABLE 4.21
TABLE SHOWING REDUCE INVENTORY COST OF FIRM
CostofProduction
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
INTERPRETATION:
The above tables show that the Cost of Production of employee are 20% of the
respondents are Not a reason, 19% of the respondents are says that neutral, 20% of the
respondents Any other, 17% of the respondents Quality service, 24% of the respondents the
Major reason.
CHART 4.21
CHART SHOWING REDUCE INVENTORY COST OF FIRM
TABLE 4.22
TAPLE SHOWING FINISHED PRODUCTS
FinishedProducts
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
INTERPRETATION:
The above tables show that the Finished Products of employee are 19% of the
respondents are Not a reason, 17% of the respondents are says that neutral, 27% of the
respondents Any other, 15% of the respondents Quality service, 22% of the respondents the
Major reason.
CHART 4.22
CHART SHOWING FINISHED PRODUCTS
TABLE 4.23
TAPLE SHOWING FIRM WITH COMPETITORS
FirmWithCompetitors
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Not a reasom 17 15.9 17.0 17.0
INTERPRETATION:
The above tables show that the Firm with Competitors of employee are 17% of the
respondents are Not a reason, 24% of the respondents are says that neutral, 18% of the
respondents Any other, 18% of the respondents Quality service, 23% of the respondents the
Major reason
CHART 4.23
CHART SHOWING FIRM WITH COMPETITORS
TABLE 4.24
TAPLE SHOWING REDUCE INVENTORY COST
CHART 4.24
CHART SHOWING REDUCE INVENTORY COST
TABLE 4.25
TAPLE SHOWING Trimming Supply Side Lead Times
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
22 20.6 22.0 22.0
Not a reason
CHART 4.25
CHART SHOWING TRIMMING SUPPLY SIDE TIMES
TABLE 4.26
TAPLE SHOWING REDUCING MATERIAL CONSUMPTION
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
21 19.6 21.0 21.0
Not a reason
INTERPRETATION:
The above tables show that the Reducing Material Consumption of employee are 21%
of the respondents are Not a reason, 20% of the respondents are says that neutral, 19% of the
respondents Any other, 19% of the respondents Quality service, 21% of the respondents the
Major reason.
CHART 4.26
CHART SHOWING REDUCE INVENTORY COST OF FIRM
TABLE 4.26
TAPLE SHOWING REDUCING DEMAND SIDE LEAD TIME
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
18 16.8 18.0 18.0
Not a reason
INTERPRETATION:
The above tables show that the Reducing Demand Side Lead time of employee are
18% of the respondents are Not a reason, 20% of the respondents are says that neutral, 21%
of the respondents Any other, 18% of the respondents Quality service, 23% of the
respondents the Major reason.
CHART 4.26
CHART SHOWING REDUCING DEMAND SIDE LEAD TIME
TABLE 4.27
INTERPRETATION:
The above tables show that the Increasing Profitability of firm of employee are 23%
of the respondents are Not a reason, 22% of the respondents are says that neutral, 13% of the
respondents Any other, 21% of the respondents Quality service, 21% of the respondents the
Major reason.
CHART 4.27
CompetitiveAdvantageInMarket
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
INTERPRETATION:
The above tables show that the Competitive Advantage in Market of employee are
18% of the respondents are Not a reason, 19% of the respondents are says that neutral, 21%
of the respondents Any other, 17% of the respondents Quality service, 25% of the
respondents the Major reason.
CHART 4.28
The above tables show that the Green Initiative of Ecosystem of employee are 23% of
the respondents are Not a reason, 17% of the respondents are says that neutral, 17% of the
respondents Any other, 21% of the respondents Quality service, 22% of the respondents the
Major reason.
CHART 4.29
INTERPRETATION:
The above tables show that the Unfair Trading Practices of employee are 22% of the
respondents are Not a reason, 15% of the respondents are says that neutral, 23% of the
respondents Any other, 17% of the respondents Quality service, 23% of the respondents the
Major reason
CHART 4.30