Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Study Guide
HSC ENGLISH (ADVANCED) COURSE
10 Mid-Course Exams
11 Mid-Course Exams
The Module is therefore requiring students to have a thorough understanding and knowledge of
Hamlet by examining the elements of character, characterisation, structure, language, themes and
setting. They need to understand how Hamlet was received and valued at the time of its writing as
well as through subsequent performances of the play. Students should develop a personal
understanding as to what Hamlet says to them now. They should also consider the ideas and
perspectives of other people to the play and those other people can include academic critics, their
fellow students and their teacher. These perspectives will only be valuable when the students have a
deep knowledge and understanding of Hamlet and have come to terms with what they personally
think about the play and its issues, characters and language. Students will also need to understand
the context in which Hamlet was written and what was valued in that context. Subsequent
performances of Hamlet will also be affected by the contextual elements and by different values and
this is what continues to give Hamlet its longevity and allows it to resonate with a range of audiences
in a range of contexts. The way we receive and respond to Hamlet is a product of our context and
what we value and students should be encouraged to see that a range of responses will lead to
different ways of receiving the play and that these too reflect different values.
In this module there is no substitute for a close and critical analysis and engagement with the whole
play. The nature of the play will lend itself to a range of teaching and learning techniques and these
should be planned and selected according to the nature of the particular class. There is an
overwhelming amount of material on Hamlet and teachers need to be judicious in their selection
and use of material so that the unit does not become so overwhelming that the enjoyment and thrill
of the text is lost. The best source for this unit is a copy of the play, which should be constantly used
as the prime reference source.
The teaching and learning ideas which follow this introduction are planned for a unit of about 7-8
weeks. The unit contains more material than this length of time but it is aimed to provide a selection
of ideas from which teachers can choose what best suits their class.
What does it mean to engage with the text and how might I do that?
What will be the best way to engage with the text?
What is meant by an informed personal understanding of Hamlet?
How can I best develop a personal understanding which is informed?
What does is meant by critical analysis?
How can I best refine my own understanding of Hamlet?
What do we mean by “perspectives”? What are synonyms for “perspectives”?
Whose perspectives should I seek?
How can I use those perspectives to confirm and consolidate my own understanding?
Should I engage in perspectives which challenge and conflict with my own understanding?
How can I best incorporate those challenging ideas in a response?
Respond to the play through a range of critical, interpretive and imaginative texts for different
purposes and audiences.
“Tragedy” is the conventional description of a play that portrays human suffering and the
decline and death of a hero or heroine. The essential principles of tragedy were established
by the Greek philosopher Aristotle (384-322BC) in his work The Poetics. Traditionally the
hero was of high status and the fall from grace was immense. The downfall of the hero is
often attributed to a tragic flaw or blemish in his or her character. Another explanation for
the hero’s downfall is that he or she has no real control over their destiny and that their fate
is determined. Aristotle writes that tragedy should succeed in “arousing pity and fear in such
a way as to accomplish a catharsis of such emotions. There should be a serious and
significant struggle and the tragic hero should face his downfall in such a way as to attain
heroic stature.
The revenge tragedy was a very popular theatrical form in Shakespearean times and Hamlet
is one of the most acclaimed examples of this form. It is a form of tragedy made popular on
the Elizabethan stage by Thomas Kyd, whose Spanish Tragedy is an early example of the
type. The theme is the revenge of a father for a son or vice versa, the revenge being directed
by the ghost of the murdered man, as in Hamlet. Other traits often found in the revenge
tragedies include the hesitation of the hero, the use of either real or pretended insanity,
suicide, intrigue, an able, scheming villain, philosophic soliloquies, and the sensational use of
horrors (murders on the stage, exhibition of dead bodies, etc.).
Question:
“Every important text challenges the audience with complex ideas and appropriate language to
express them.”
How does Shakespeare use the language and conventions of drama to challenge the audience with
complex ideas in Act 1?
OR
1. Choose five extracts from Act III where Shakespeare uses language in a powerful way.
Analyse the techniques used in each of those examples.
2. Explain the main argument in Hamlet’s forth soliloquy, “To be or not to be”. How is language
used to present this argument? What dramatic function does this soliloquy have at this point
of the play?
4. What themes are explored in this Act? Which themes would be most appreciated by the
Elizabethan and which would be more relevant to audiences today? How are these themes
reconciled with the values of both societies?
5. Examine closely the “play within a play” Scene and discuss its contribution to the dramatic
structure, the revenge tragedy format and to the themes of the play. Explain the dramatic
convention of the masque/mime. Why is this regarded as the “turning point “in the play?
6. Explore the tragedy of Ophelia. What is it about her plight which resonates so powerfully
with us today? Suggest three contemporary actresses which your group thinks would suit
the role of Ophelia in a new film or theatre production.
7. Explore the soliloquy of Claudius in Scene iii. Analyse how the forms and features of
language are used to reveal another perspective of Claudius. Explore the concerns of Hamlet
when he comes across the praying Claudius and explain why Hamlet does not act then. What
is the irony of Hamlet’s decision?
8. Closely examine the closet scene in Scene iv. A closet was a private room and in the last 100
years directors have staged this scene in Gertrude’s bedroom. This has resulted in increased
speculation about Hamlet having sexual desires towards his mother. Psychoanalytical
perspectives have fuelled this perspective with discussion about Hamlet and his Oedipal
complex. Closely examine this scene and present two perspectives on its meaning.
Due:
Discuss how the ending of Hamlet reflects the context and values of Elizabethan England. Compare
the representation of these values in the Branagh version with one other film production. Do the
two different productions represent different perspectives on the ending of the play and thus the
play’s meaning? Which version do you personally prefer? Justify your preference.
Using a range of resources from the library, including internet sites, read and consider a range of
critical responses to the character of Hamlet. Examine TWO different perspectives/ readings/views
of the character of Hamlet. Give evidence from the text which supports each perspective and discuss
which perspective confirms and consolidates your own personal understanding of Hamlet and which
perspectives challenge and contradict with your personal understanding? See Resource 1 for
examples of different critical perspectives on the character of Hamlet.
Reflection question: How valuable did you find reading this critical analysis in shaping your own
understanding of the play?
Essay Question:
Your class has been exploring the question, “What will continue to make Hamlet worthy of critical
study?
Your personal response has been challenged by another student. Defend your response through
critical evaluation of Hamlet, analysing the construction, content and language of the text (HSC
2005). A copy of the criteria can be downloaded on the BOS site.
organise, develop and express ideas using language appropriate to audience, purpose
and form
Ears – note their use in the play and the relevant mentions of hearing. Who hears what?
Eyes – remember what they are supposed to represent
Snakes/serpents – who is the bad guy that offered the apple to Eve?
Poison/venom – who administers these evils?
Christian v magic references – Everywhere!! Why is that the case?
Sickness of the state and King - it is important to note each of the references
MADNESS!!!!! – Who is mad? Who is playing mad? WHAT is mad? Why are they mad?
The Message
Most importantly, in a study of textual integrity YOU need to decide what the message is.
What is Shakespeare trying to say to us? Try to answer this early and develop it. Once you
establish a message (or three) it is easier to be critical of the work and its ability to convey
that message. GO BEYOND THEMES. The message is conveyed through the themes. E.g. IS
Shakespeare saying that there is a need for balance between fate and destiny? If so, does he
convey it well?
The best beginning procedure is always to familiarise yourself with the cast of characters
and then to read the play (or at least an act or a scene) all the way through so that you know
what's happening. The notes can help if you're stuck, but try to get the big picture of a scene
before getting bogged down in details. Read through, then go back and clear up details.
Then you're ready to think about the questions.
2. What is the relationship between The Wheel of Fortune and Fate? How does it link to
Hamlet?
ACT 1
1.1
2. “Any act of treason or treachery against the King was considered indirectly to be a
mortal sin against God. The penalty was death.” Is this applicable to the deaths of Hamlet
and Old Fortinbras?
3. What happens when Francisco and Bernardo meet at the beginning of 1.1? Where
are we, and when? Why is there confusion over which one is supposed to challenge the
other by asking "Who's there"? Why is Horatio with Bernardo and Marcellus? Who is he?
4. What is Horatio's initial response to the story of the apparition? What happens
when the ghost appears for the first time (1.1.37.1)? Notice that Horatio addresses it as
"thou." This is the form of address used with friends or inferiors. Shakespeare's audience
would have been much more attuned to the difference than we are. What is the effect of
Horatio's addressing the ghost as "thou"?
5. (a) What does Horatio first assume the appearance of the ghost means (1.1.68)?
(b) Why are there such intense war preparations in Denmark? (Read 1.1.69-106
carefully to get the international background of the play.)
(c) What does Horatio suggest by his discussion of Julius Caesar's death (1.1.106.5-
.18)? Why does he choose the example of Rome?
6. What happens when the ghost appears for the second time (at the SD before
1.1.108.1)? Why does it leave so abruptly? The questions Horatio asks it represent,
according to the thought of the time, the reasons why a ghost could appear.
5. What is the purpose of the two discussions of the crowing of the cock, Horatio's pagan
one (1.1.130-37) and Marcellus' Christian one (1.1.138-45)?
7. What do we know so far about the nature of the ghost? Do we know yet if it is a
"good" ghost (i.e., "really" the spirit of the person it appears to be) or a "damned" ghost (a
devil or evil spirit in the shape of the person it appears to be)?
1.2
1. There are some statements of apposition in the first part of Claudius’ speech (1.2.1-
16). What is he telling the court?
2. What does he say about young Fortinbras and his uncle the king of Norway (ll. 17-
41)? How is Claudius responding to the threat? Who is sent off to Norway to stop
Fortinbras?(You may also want to keep in mind that the name "Claudius" appears only in the
4. What do Claudius and Gertrude want Hamlet to do that he doesn't want to do? (You
probably know three names associated with the University of Wittenberg in Germany:
Martin Luther, Doctor Faustus, and Hamlet. Can you see any connections among the three?)
5. What is an aside? In the aside 1.2.65, what does Hamlet mean? Who is he speaking
to? What pun is used by Hamlet in this line?
6. (a) How seriously do you take Claudius' argument against Hamlet's "prolonged"
mourning (1.2.87-108)?
(b)How long has Hamlet been mourning (1.2.138)? (The normal mourning period of a
noble or gentle woman for a dead husband at this time [ca. 1600] was a year or
more.) (c) Metaphors are used in 1.2.65-85 Choose one and describe its meaning.
7. What is Hamlet's response to the news from Horatio, Marcellus, and Bernardo?
Notice the way Hamlet questions them. How much do we know about how his mind works
at this point of the play? What does he suspect as the reason for the ghost's appearance
(1.2.254-57)?
9. “The funeral baked meats did coldly furnish forth the marriage tables.” What does
Hamlet mean by this?
1.3
1. What does Laertes warn Ophelia about? What, apparently, has been the relationship
between Hamlet and Ophelia since his return from Wittenberg? What comment does he
make about Hamlet’s position and the country?
3. What advice does Polonius give to Ophelia in regard to Hamlet’s advances? Support
this with evidence from the play.
4. Ophelia tells her father she will obey his wishes. What does this say about women of
the Elizabethan period? Do you think Hamlet’s love is fake?
5. What do we know about Laertes, Polonius, and Ophelia by the end of 1.3?
What sort of people are they? What sort of family are they? Who is missing from this
family? How strong-willed in Ophelia?
1.4
1. (a) Why do the trumpets and cannons sound, according to Hamlet?
(b) What does Hamlet think of the custom?
(c) According to Hamlet what is the effect of the King’s behaviour on a country?
2. Hamlet then sees the ghost who ‘beckons Hamlet’ away. Horatio and Marcellus try
to stop Hamlet following the ghost. What does Horatio think the ghost could do? Hamlet is
determined to follow: “Unhand me gentlemen! By Heaven I’ll make a ghost of him that lets
me.”
What does Marcellus think the problem is? How does Horatio believe it will be remedied?
1.5
1. The Ghost says he is ‘thy father’s spirit.’
2. Do father and son have the same opinion of Claudius? (Compare 1.2.139-40, 152-53
and 1.5.47-52.) Would others in the court, not knowing about Claudius' crime, see Claudius
as this much below his dead brother?
5. Read Hamlet's second soliloquy carefully (1.5.92-113). What does Hamlet say he has
learned? Notice how quickly Hamlet moves from the specific (Claudius) to the
general ("one"). Compare the same movement he makes from the specific person
6. Hamlet asks Marcellus and Horatio never to speak about the appearance of the
ghost again.
(a) Why do you think he does this?
(b) Why does Horatio hesitate?
(c) What does ‘the time is out of joint” mean? How can Hamlet set it right?
ACT 2
2.1
1. How much time has passed between Act 1 and Act 2? How do you know? (Keep
watching for evidence.)
2. What is Polonius telling Reynaldo to do? What does this tell up about Polonius and
his way of thinking and acting?
4. What is Polonius' response to what Ophelia tells him? Where are they going? Why?
2.2
1. Why have Rosencrantz and Guildenstern come to court? What is their relation to
Hamlet? What use does Claudius have for them? Does this remind you of Polonius' use for
Reynaldo? Are there any significant differences?
2. We've now had several different explanations of Hamlet's madness: love (2.1.86,
103), his father's death (2.2.8), and that plus "our o'erhasty marriage" (2.2.57note
Gertrude's awareness of impropriety). Are people content with these explanations? Are
you? Explain.
3. What results have come from Cornelius' and Voltemand's trip to Norway? Has
Claudius' use of diplomacy rather than war been justified?
4. (a) What does Polonius suggest madness is? Note the views on madness so far.
Which do you agree with? Why?
(b) How effective is Polonius as a bearer of news? How convinced are Claudius and
Gertrude that Polonius has found the answer? How do they plan to test this answer?
(c) (What do you think of Polonius? Is he a finder and presenter of truth?
7. (a) How does Hamlet behave initially with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern (through
2.2.216-66)? Is it different from the way he just acted with Polonius?
(b) How does Hamlet change when he realises that the two were sent for by Claudius
and Gertrude?
8. How seriously should we take Hamlet's view of the world and of "man" (2.2.287-98).
How do Rosencrantz and Guildenstern react to Hamlet's use of "generic" man (2.2.298-
300)?
9. Why are the players traveling? What has been going on in the city? (Much of
2.2.317-46 refers to contemporary events in London around 1599-1601.)
11. (a) What is unusual about the speech Hamlet begins to recite (2.2.430-44) and the
First Player continues (2.2.448-498)?
(b)How is its style different from that of the surrounding lines of Hamlet? Why is its
subject matter appropriate? Who are Priam, Pyrrhus and Hecuba
12. What play does Hamlet want the players to play? What does he want to do to the play?
2. Finally the planned meeting between Hamlet and Ophelia is arranged, spies and all.
(a) What does Polonius give Ophelia to read (3.1.46)?
(b) What response does his remark get (in an aside) from Claudius?
(c) Why is this speech of Claudius' important? What do we learn that we have not
learned before?
5. (a) How does Claudius respond to what he has seen and heard? Is he convinced
that love is the cause of Hamlet's madness?
(b) What does he plan to do about Hamlet? How does Polonius respond? Is he willing
to give up his "love" answer? What does he propose as an additional way to find out what
Hamlet is thinking? Are you surprised that it includes spying?
3.2
2. Why does Hamlet say he especially likes Horatio (3.2.56-67, esp. 64-67)? Does
Hamlet see Horatio as similar to him or different from him?
4. Note the suggestive nature of Hamlet’s language when speaking to Gertrude and
Ophelia. Give three examples and explain their meaning. What are his motivations?
5. Based on 3.2.116, how much time elapsed between Act 1 and Act 2 (since the action
has been continuous since the beginning of Act 2)?
7. What is Claudius' mood as he stops the play at 3.2.247? How does Hamlet respond?
If Hamlet has learned that Claudius is indeed guilty (if that's why he stopped the play and
not for some other reason), Claudius has also learned something from the presentation of
the play. What has Claudius learned?
10. Read Hamlet's fifth soliloquy carefully (3.2.358-69). How is it different from the other
soliloquies? What is the mood of the soliloquy? How do you react to it? What about line
360? What is happening to Hamlet?
3.3
1. What has Claudius decided to do with Hamlet? Who will go with him? What
"theoretical" message about kingship does Rosencrantz tell to Claudius?
3. What does Claudius admit in his attempt to pray? Has the play actually had an effect on
him? Why can't he ask for forgiveness?
4. Note the pun “wretched state”. Is the Kings emotions and feelings reflected in the state of
his country?
4. What happens when Hamlet enters? Why doesn't Hamlet kill Claudius then? What is
ironic about Hamlet's decision?
3.4
1. How successful is the first part of the interview between Gertrude and Hamlet? What
goes wrong (even before Polonius' death)? Who controls the conversation? Why does
Gertrude call for help?
2. Does Gertrude know that Claudius killed Hamlet's father? (Consider 3.4.27-29, 38-39, 50-
51.)
3. What device does Hamlet use to force Gertrude to consider what she has done?
4. Hamlet seems to be getting through to Gertrude when the Ghost enters. Why does the
Ghost appear at this point? How is his appearance different from his appearances in Act 1?
Who saw him then? Who sees him now? What is his message to Hamlet?
5. After the Ghost leaves, does Hamlet succeed in what he came to do? What is Gertrude's
state when he leaves?
6. What does Hamlet think of his upcoming trip to England? What does he expect to do?
ACT 4
1. Does Gertrude tell Claudius the truth about what happened between her and Hamlet
(4.1.6-7)? Is she following Hamlet's advice at the end of 3.4? Explain the metaphor she uses
to describe his madness.
2. How does Claudius respond to the death of Polonius? Does he understand the
implications of what happened? What will he do now?
4.2
1. How is Hamlet’s understanding of the situation (and perhaps, sanity) revealed with
his description of Rosencrantz as a sponge?
4.3
3. What is the result of Hamlet's joking about death and worms? What connection do
the worms and their diet have with Wittenberg? (Note 4 to line 31gives most of the answer.
The Diet, headed by the Emperor and meeting at Worms in 1521, pronounced its ban on
Luther after he refused to recant.) Keep the whole "worm" discussion in mind when you get
to 5.1, the graveyard scene. This discussion is a prelude to that one.
4. What do Claudius' letters tell England (i.e., the king of England) to do with Hamlet?
Why does Claudius expect to be obeyed? (The situation is more or less historical, since
England was ruled by a Danish king from 1016-1042. The original Hamlet story seems to
date from about this time.)
4.4
2. What sort of judgment does the Captain make about the place they are fighting for?
How does Hamlet describe it (4.4.9.15-.19)?
4. Read Hamlet's sixth soliloquy carefully (4.4.9.22-.56). What is unusual about it given
its position in the play? Has Hamlet been delaying, as he says? What example does he
compare himself to? (And what other soliloquy does this one remind you of?) What is
Hamlet’s opinion of Fortinbras?
4.5
1. What do we learn about the state of Gertrude's soul in her aside (4.5.17-20)? What does
this say about how she has responded to Hamlet's accusations and recommendations in
3.4?
2. The court assumes Ophelia's madness is caused by her father's death. Judging from her
songs, are they correct? Is that the only thing that has made her mad? What else is on her
mind and coming to the surface in her madness? Is she mad? Note the style of her speech.
3. What is Laertes' approach to revenging his father's death? How does it compare to
Hamlet's? How much support does he have? Whom does he initially blame?
4. What is being threatened as Laertes enters (4.5.107.1)? How well does Claudius handle
this emergency?
5. How does Laertes respond to Ophelia? Does he think her mad? Give evdence.What offer
does Claudius make to get his discussion with Laertes back on track?
4.6
1. Who brings Hamlet's letter to Horatio? What has happened to Hamlet? (Happily, we have
been spared seeing Hamlet as Errol Flynnsee Olivier's movie version for that. However, this
letter does show us a Hamlet quite capable of acting when the occasion presents itself.)
4.7
1. Claudius has obviously convinced Laertes of his innocence. What is Claudius’ elements of
Claudius’ rule are evident in this passage? What things of a personal nature do we learn
about Gertrude and Claudius (4.7.11-16)? Laertes wants his revenge, but Claudius tells him
"You shortly shall hear more." What does Claudius expect to be able to tell Laertes soon?
2. What does Hamlet's letter tell Claudius? Why does Hamlet want to see him"alone"? What
seems to be Hamlet's plan?
3. What plan do Claudius and Laertes develop? What happened when Lamord came to
Denmark two months ago? How will Claudius and Laertes use Laertes' reputation to get
revenge? What plan does this remind ou of?
5. How many tricks and poisons does it take (according to Claudius and Laertes) to kill a
Hamlet?
6. What happened to Ophelia? What is the queen’s observation? Did she kill herself, or is
her death accidental (based on this description; her death gets a different spin in 5.1)?
7. Consider the short timeframe in which the past events have occurred. How does the
structure of the play emphasise this feeling?
8.What is Laertes' response to Ophelia’s death? What does Claudius fear will happen?
ACT 5
5.1
1. What are the two clowns doing while they talk? Who is the "she" of 5.1.1? Why,
according to the second clown, is she really being given a Christian burial?
2. What happens in the discussion between Hamlet and the Gravedigger? What does
Hamlet learn from his confrontation with Yorick's skull? What does he learn from his
meditation on Alexander and Caesar? How does the mood here differ from that in 4.3.17-
38? What do you think Hamlet is saying about life on Earth? How does this speech relate to
the Elizabethan concept of the Wheel of Fortune?
4. What do we learn from Gertrude's farewell to Ophelia (5.1.227-30)? Would Polonius have
been surprised if he had heard this?
5. What happens when Hamlet appears to the others? What is significant about him calling
himself "Hamlet the Dane" (5.1.242see the footnote)? Why is he so angry?
5.2
1. What new sort of attitude to life do you see in the Hamlet of the first 81 lines of 5.2 ?
What is his attitude to fate? Give examples.
2. What would have happened to him in England? How did he find out? What did he do
about it? What has happened to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern? How does Hamlet feel
about them? What does he mean by ‘baser nature’?
4. What is Hamlet's reaction to the idea of the match (5.2.148-61)? (The Folio text has an
additional sentence at the end: "Let be.")? How well does Hamlet expect to do? Why does
he go ahead with it? How does this reflect the new attitude we saw in Hamlet in 5.1?
Consider closely 5.5.219-225
5. Hamlet clearly apologizes to Laertes (5.2.163-81). How does Laertes respond? Given what
we know about the plans of Laertes and Claudius, how do you take Laertes' promise
(5.2.187-89)? Can we say he has any honor at all? Has he followed his father's precept in
1.3.78-80?
7. What is the "union" Claudius promises to put in the cup at line 210 and perhaps does not
put into the cup until after line 225? What problem is created by Hamlet's response in line
227? What happens at line 232? (And what is the score by now?)
8. Look carefully at lines 245-55, noting who wounds whom and with what sword, and what
happens to Gertrude (including Claudius' lie at line 251). Note the mention of the poison as
venom. Who is being compared to a snake again?
10. Why is Hamlet so concerned that Horatio stay alive to tell his story? How much do the
other people at court know at this point?
11. Do you believe Horatio in his assumption that Hamlet is saved and not damned? Why or
why not?
12. Does the Hamlet Fortinbras describes (5.2.339-44) sound like the Hamlet we have
known? What will happen to the kingdom under Fortinbras?
Resource 1
Melancholic, witty, heroic, hypocritical, rational, regressive, noble, inert, vengeful, compassionate,
cruel, amiable, diseased, determined, undecided, corrupt, vacillating, contemplative, misogynous,
reflective, mad, wise.
Read the following perspectives on Hamlet and decide which are similar and group them together
in terms of the points that they make or the positions they appear to be made from. Which
perspectives are closest to your own understanding of the play and the character of Hamlet?
1. “A man who at any other time and in any other circumstances…would have been perfectly equal
to his task….For the cause (of his delay) was not directly or mainly an habitual excess of
reflectiveness. The direct cause was a state of mind quite abnormal and induced by special
circumstances, - a state of profound melancholy”. A.C. Bradley, 1904.
2. “…..all that is amiable and excellent in nature is combined in Hamlet, with the exception of one
quality…..the great object of his life is defeated by continually resolving to do, yet doing nothing
but resolve.” S.T. Coleridge 1817
3. “He is the epical hero fighting overwhelming odds with his back against the wall….” John Dover
Wilson 1935.
4. “Hamlet, although corrupted by the evil with which he is asked to deal, does at last resign
himself to becoming the agent of Christian providence.” Kenneth Muir. 1963.
5. “His greatness is that of the spirit: “nobility” the obvious word, a fineness and delicacy of being.
But most of what we see of him in the action is not controlled by his fineness and nobility, but by
accidental circumstance: by his mother’s remarriage, the ghost’s revelation of foul treachery, a
stupid, loving girl’s conventional behaviour when slighted…….Against the fineness of being,
there is constantly clumsiness and sometimes the ignobility of doing. Hamlet is, as we recognise,
so much too good for his fate.” A.P. Rossiter 1961.
6. “Hamlet’s nature is philosophical, reflective, prone to questioning and therefore aware of the
larger moral implications of any act.” Mary Salter 1988.
9. Hamlet when we first meet him, has lost all sense of life's significance. To a man bereft of the
sense of purpose there is no possibility of creative action. No act but suicide is rational. Yet to
Hamlet comes the command of a great act-revenge: therein lies the unique quality of the play- a
sick soul is commanded to heal, to cleanse, and to create harmony. But good cannot come of
evil: it is seen that the sickness of his soul only further infects the state-his disintegration spreads
out, disintegrating.” George Wilson Knight. 1930.
10. “Hamlet is full of weakness and melancholy, but there is no harshness in his nature. He is the
most amiable of misanthropes.” William Hazlitt, 1817.
11. “Hamlet gives dignity to the human race by showing what feats it is capable: he extends the
bounds of experience for others and enhances their appreciation of life by the example of his
abundant vitality.” C.M. Bowra 1952.
12. “Hamlet is a man of painful sensitivity, tortured the crassness of the world he sees and b the
crudities of the action demanded of him.” F. Richmond 1981.
13. “……..the strength of the emotional shock Hamlet has suffered is equaled by the weakness of his
mind in the face of difficult moral and metaphysical issues.” D.G. James 1951
14. “Hamlet is an idealist, unequal to the real world, repelled by it, who grows embittered and sickly,
to the detriment of his noble character.” G.G. Gervinius.
15. “It is a vulgar and barbarous drama which would not be tolerated by the vilest populace of
France or Italy. Hamlet becomes crazy in the second act, his mistress becomes crazy in the
third….Hamlet, his mother and father-in-law carouse on the stage; songs are sung at table; there
is quarrelling, fighting, killing-one would imagine this piece to be the work of a drunken savage.
But among these vulgar irregularities, which to this day make the English drama so absurd and
so barbarous, there are to be found in Hamlet, by a bizarrerie still greater, some sublime
passages, worthy of the greatest genius”. Voltaire. 1752.
16. “It is evident to me that Shakespeare meant to represent the effects of an action laid upon a
soul unfit for the performance of itt….A lovely, pure, noble and highly moral being, with the
strength of mind which forms a hero, sinks beneath a load which it cannot bear and must not
renounce.” Goethe. 1795
17. “Now, what does Hamlet represent? Analysis, first of all, and egotism, and therefore incredulity.
He lives entirely for himslef; he is an egotist. But even an egotist cannot believe in himself. We
can only believe in that which is outside of and above ourselves. But this “I” in which he does not
believe, is dear to Hamlet. This is the point of departure to which he constantly returns because
18. “In this sense the Dionysian man represents Hamlet, both have once looked truly into the
essence of things, they have gained knowledge and nausea inhibits action; for their action could
not change anything in the eternal nature of things; they feel it to be ridiculous or humiliating
that they should be asked to set right a world that is out of joint. Knowledge kills action; action
requires the veils of illusion; that is the doctrine of Hamlet, not that cheap wisdom of Jack the
Dreamer who reflects too much, and, as it were from excesses of possibilities, does not get
around to action. Not reflection no-true knowledge, an insight into the horrible truth, outweighs
any motive for action.” Friedrich Nietzsche 1872.
19. “Hamlet is something radically new, even for and in Shakespeare: his theatricality is
dangerously nihilistic because it so paradoxically natural to him. More than his parody Hamm in
Beckett’s Endgame, Hamlet is a walking mousetrap, embodying the anxious expectations that
are incarnating the malaise of Elsinore. Iago may be nothing if not critical: Hamlet is criticism
itself, the theatrical interpreter of his own story.” Harold Bloom 1999.
20. “He is loving, callous, fastidious, coarse, contemptuous, considerate, vindictive, prudish,
indecisive, tough, incapable, philosophic, violent, melancholy, resilient, vulnerable, demotic,
articulate, self-hating and much else, including a sage director and Denmark’s’; premier theatre
citric. He is Dr Jekyll and perhaps he is also My Hyde, in D.H. Lawrence’s words “a repulsive,
creeping. Unclean thing.” He is a success, for he gets his man, and a failure, for he leaves behind
eight bodies, including his own, where there was meant to b one.” Benedict Nightingale. 2008.
Resource 2
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
ETA Module A teaching notes prepared by Sandy Csenderits, Shirley Warden and Sandra Hurst 2002:
while this was written for Module A there is excellent material on historical, literary and cultural
contexts.
COURSE TEXTS:
Excel HSC Advanced English. B. Spurr and L.Cameron. Pascal Press 2001. P. 161-168.
This chapter was written for Module A (Transformation) but it is useful in background information
on Hamlet, gives a valuable Act-by-act analysis.
Advanced English All Texts Study Guide. B. Fuller, L. Gumley, J. Sinclair. Five Senses Education.
2000.P. 9-18
This chapter was written for Module A (Transformation) but it is useful on social, cultural and
historical context, gives a valuable scene-by-scene analysis and a brief summary of the characters.
Literature a close study. Burns and McNamara. Macmillan. 1983.P. 24: Close study of Hamlet’s
soliloquy in II.ii. with some excellent questions for detailed analysis.
CRITICAL STUDIES:
O Brave New World. Two Centuries of Shakespeare on the Australian Stage. J.Golder and R.
Madelaine (ed) Curency. Sydney. 2001.
A useful overview of critics and Shakespeare including a specific section on Hamlet with 6 critical
perspectives from critics from 1765 to 1935.
How to Read and Why. H. Bloom. Fourth Estate. London. 2001. p. 201-217 : the leading literary critic
of our time explores the play.
What Happens in Hamlet. John Dover Wilson. Cambridge University Press. 1993. A close analysis of
the play, background of Elizabethan beliefs and a perspective of the play by T.S. Eliot.
Shakespeare’s Tragic Sequence K. Muir. J. Lawlor (ed) Hutchinson. London. P55-92 Chapter on
Hamlet.
Readings on Hamlet :Literary Companion Series Greenhaven Press, USA, 1999 . A collection of 19
different perspectives on Hamlet which give a wide range of information and opinion about the play
and its author’s style, themes and outlook on the human perspective. The contributors are a
combination of Shakespearean scholars and actors. This is a very readable book and includes some
really interesting contributions on topics like revenge tragedy, the soliloquies and a chapter by
Laurence Olivier as an actor.
Shakespeare’s Hamlet. Derick Marsh. Sydney University Press. 1970. Includes an excellent chapter
on The Criticism of Hamlet as an “industry”. Marsh includes a range of other perspectives and
opinions on the play.
Hamlet. Cambridge Wizard Student Guide. Cambridge University Press. 2003. A very student-
friendlty and accassable book with hnotes on Shakesapeare, genre, structure, style, a summary of
the play, characters, themns and some criotical responses.
Hamlet Cambridge Student Guide,. Cambridge University Press. 2002. A student-friendly book with a
valuable section on “Critical Approaches” eg Political Criticism and Postmodern Criticism.
Reading Hamlet Bronwyn Mellor. Chalkface Press. 1989. This would be a marvellous text to buy as a
class set. It has informative sections on revenge tragedy, and reading the play and different
characters.
AUDIO-VISUAL RESOURCES.
Videos/DVDs
Hamlet (USA 1964) Directors: Bill Coleran, John Gielgud. Hamlet: Richard Burton.
Shakespeare and His Theatre, Understanding Shakeapeare, His Sources, His Stagecraft.
Audio recordings
Resource 3
Through its portrayal of human experience, Shakespeare’s Hamlet reinforces the significance of
loyalty. To what extent does your interpretation of Hamlet support this view? In your response,
make detailed reference to the play.
Marking guidelines on BOSE site: 2009 exam and “notes from the marking centre”.
In your view, how have dramatic techniques been used to reveal memorable ideas in
Shakespeare’s Hamlet? Support your view with detailed reference to the text.
2007 HSC:
Explore the representation of at least ONE intense human experience in Hamlet, evaluating its
significance in the play as a whole.
Marking guidelines on BOSE site: 2007 exam and “notes from the marking centre”.
2006 HSC:
To what extent has your personal response to Hamlet been shaped by the enduring power of
Shakespeare’s characterisation of Hamlet?
Support your evaluation with a close analysis of TWO key extracts from Hamlet.
Marking guidelines on BOSE site: 2006 exam and “notes from the marking centre”.
2005 HSC:
Your class has been exploring the question, “What will continue to make Hamlet worthy of critical
study?”
Your personal response has been challenged by another student. Defend your response through a
critical evaluation of Hamlet, analysing the construction, content and language of the text.
Marking guidelines on BOSE site: 2005 exam and Notes from the Marking Centre.
“Interpretations of texts can shift and change with time and place.”
Considering your time and place, reflect on the ways in which context has shaped your critical
interpretation of Hamlet.
Marking guidelines on BOSE site:2004 exam and Notes from the Marking Centre.
2003 HSC:
Compose an argument for or against the topic: “That every text has its used-by date.”
Consider your prescribed text’s ideas, language and form, and its reception in different contexts.
2002 HSC:
Two people who value your prescribed text in different ways and for different reasons are having a
conversation.
Compose their conversation which should include consideration of the structure, staging, language
and ideas of the text.
1. “An admirable text does not define nor exhaust its possibilities.” Discuss this idea with close
reference to at least two scenes from Hamlet.
2. While our reading of a text is always influenced by our own experience, we must never ignore
for whom and by whom it was composed. How does our understanding of context influence
our reading of a text? Refer in detail to William Shakespeare’s Hamlet.
2. “A text to be considered worthy of study must have a core that is available and understood
by all readers.” Write an article for a weekend magazine where you present your view on this
statement. In your article you must make close reference to Hamlet.
3. Texts are never objective: they convey a sense of what is important in the lives of both the
composer and the responder.” In the text you have studied, what is valued by the composer
and the responder?
4. Imagine you are directing a performance of Hamlet and you have a particular reading of the
play that you want to present to the audience. Explain to the people playing the roles of
Hamlet, Claudius and Gertrude in the play how you would like to represent these characters
to reflect the reading you have chosen. Make sure you refer in detail to specific scenes.
5. A leading publisher is preparing a new collection of texts entitled Texts for all Times.
According to the editor of this collection, a text may be considered a classic if it meets the
following requirements. It must be:
Considered important in the time and context of its composition
Relevant to more than one generation (past or future)
Open to interpretation.
6. Argue for the inclusion of Hamlet in the publication, Texts for all Times. You have been asked
to deliver the 2009 speech at the annual dinner of the International Shakespeare Society
focusing on the status of Hamlet as a classic text. In this speech you must:
Outline what makes the play a classic.
Discuss different ways of valuing and receiving the play.
You may also describe any visual aids you would use as part of your presentation.
7. Imagine you are the actor playing Hamlet in a production of Hamlet. You have been asked by
the director to explain how you see your character and how you would present him to best
convey your interpretation. Write the conversation you have with the director. In your
conversation, refer to two scenes in detail.
8. “Hamlet is a play that explores ideas and issues that are particularly relevant for
contemporary society.” Select one idea or issue that you feel is particularly relevant for
contemporary society and discuss how a production of the play for a contemporary audience
might represent this. How would this production challenge, or reflect on, the representation
of this idea or issue in one production with which you are familiar?
10. You have been invited to give a lecture to an HSC class about Hamlet. You must explain why
Hamlet is significant, taking in consideration different perspectives of the text, including how
the text has been read, received and valued in historical and other contexts.
11. Select a significant scene from Hamlet. Evaluate the impact that your critical study has had
on your response to this scene and how the construction, content and language of this scene
contribute to the textual integrity of the play. Your response must be based on a detailed
examination of Hamlet.