Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
OWNER
THAI RAYON PCL
OWNER’S ENGINEER
CONTRACTOR
PROJECT
80m TALL STEEL CHIMNEY
TITLE
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CHECK REPORT
FOR STACK COMPONENTS
FOR INCREASED LOAD DUE TO STRAKES
1 Introduction 4
4 Dynamic wind 10
5 Analysis results 11
6 Design checks 11
6.1 Deflection check 11
6.2 Deflection check 12
6.3 Stress check 12
6.4 Check for base plate/ foundation bolts 12
6.5 Check for piles 13
6.6 Check for pile cap 14
7 Conclusion 14
8 References 15
1 Introduction
In order to suppress across-wind oscillation of the chimney, it is decided to provide helical steel strakes.
However, addition of strakes leads to increase in effective diameter of the chimney and corresponding
wind load over the top portion of the chimney. In this design report, the chimney section, holding down
bolts and foundation are checked for wind loads with the addition of strakes.
2.1 Geometry
The stack is modelled using 1-dimensional beam elements as shown below.
Node numbers
Element numbers
The density of the material is adjusted so as to account for the insulation and aluminium cladding around
the stack as well.
3
For 15mm thick MS wall, 50mm thick resin bonded rock wool insulation (density 100 kg/m ) and 0.8mm
3
thick aluminium cladding (density 2700 kg/m ) are provided.
Hence, the mass of (stack wall + insulation + cladding) = 78.5 x 0.015 + 0.98 x 0.05 + 27 x 0.0008
2
= 1.248 kN/m .
3
Equivalent density = 1.28/0.015 = 83.21 kN/m .
DATE: 31.05.18 NOTE NO. : 230/E/DN-02 (R0)
b) Mass of stiffeners:-
(6 − 0.9)
Outside diameter of chimney at level 1m from base = 6 − x1 = 5.936m
80
π 3
Volume of ring = (5.906 2 - 5.406 2 ) x 0.01 =0.0444 m
4
3
Total volume of stiffener plate = ½ x 0.25 x 0.25 x0.01 =0.00312 m
Similarly we calculate the weight of stiffeners at each level and take the average for each element of height
5m and assign the same in the STAAD model.
DATE: 31.05.18 NOTE NO. : 230/E/DN-02 (R0)
b) Mass of platforms:-
We calculate the weight of platforms by considering that each panel of every platform is similar and
consists of the same elements, as shown in table below
Level Pl No Pipe Tl Length Wt wt/panel Checkered Plate Plate wt Total wt per panel Panel Total wt
m (m) Kg/m volume /panel m3 Kg Kg Nos. KN
42.7x3.2mm 1.75 2.29 4.0075
10 1 60.5x3.2mm 7.24 4.25 30.77 0.00304 23.864 65.57 19 12.510
76.3x3.2mm 1.2 5.77 6.924
42.7x3.2mm 1.75 2.29 4.0075
20 2 60.5x3.2mm 7.24 4.25 30.77 0.00304 8.208 49.91 17 8.537
76.3x3.2mm 1.2 5.77 6.924
42.7x3.2mm 1.75 2.29 4.0075
30 3 60.5x3.2mm 7.24 4.25 30.77 0.00304 8.208 49.91 14 7.040
76.3x3.2mm 1.2 5.77 6.924
42.7x3.2mm 1.75 2.29 4.0075
40 4 60.5x3.2mm 7.24 4.25 30.77 0.00304 8.208 49.91 12 6.042
76.3x3.2mm 1.2 5.77 6.924
42.7x3.2mm 1.75 2.29 4.0075
50 5 60.5x3.2mm 7.24 4.25 30.77 0.00304 8.208 49.91 10 5.043
76.3x3.2mm 1.2 5.77 6.924
42.7x3.2mm 1.75 2.29 4.0075
60 6 60.5x3.2mm 7.24 4.25 30.77 0.00304 8.208 49.91 8 4.045
76.3x3.2mm 1.2 5.77 6.924
42.7x3.2mm 1.75 2.29 4.0075
70 7 60.5x3.2mm 7.24 4.25 30.77 0.00304 8.208 49.91 6 3.047
76.3x3.2mm 1.2 5.77 6.924
42.7x3.2mm 1.75 2.29 4.0075
80 8 60.5x3.2mm 7.24 4.25 30.77 0.00304 8.208 49.91 4 2.049
76.3x3.2mm 1.2 5.77 6.924
DATE: 31.05.18 NOTE NO. : 230/E/DN-02 (R0)
EL OD K2 Vz pz pstatic
(m) (m) (m/s) (kPa) (kN/m)
80 1.080 1.14 44.79 1.20 0.91
75 1.463 1.14 44.53 1.19 1.22
70 1.845 1.13 44.26 1.18 1.52
65 2.228 1.12 43.97 1.16 1.81
60 2.610 1.11 43.65 1.14 2.09
55 2.494 1.10 43.31 1.13 1.96
50 2.813 1.09 42.93 1.11 2.18
45 3.131 1.08 42.51 1.08 2.38
40 3.450 1.07 42.05 1.06 2.56
35 3.769 1.06 41.52 1.03 2.73
30 4.088 1.04 40.91 1.00 2.87
25 4.406 1.02 40.19 0.97 2.99
20 4.725 1.00 39.30 0.93 3.07
15 5.044 0.97 38.16 0.87 3.09
10 5.363 0.93 36.56 0.80 3.01
5 5.681 0.93 36.56 0.80 3.19
0 6.000 0.93 36.56 0.80 3.37
This load is applied as piece-wise linear load on the beam elements as shown below.
DATE: 31.05.18 NOTE NO. : 230/E/DN-02 (R0)
4 Dynamic wind
[2]
From our earlier analysis , we note the first mode natural period of vibration is:
Ti = 0.964 sec
ξi = Ti x Vb / 1200
= 0.03
For dynamic
influence,
ξi = 2.61
ν= 0.63
Dist.
j/k EL Mode Mass Y2ik . Mk mk Yik .Pst,k . mk ηij Pdyn,ij Load
2
(m) ordinate (kg) (m/s ) (kN) (kN/m)
1 80 1 1257.0 1257.0 0.570 3032.6 2.56 5.32 1.064
2 75 0.87751 2757.6 2123.4 0.578 3466.5 2.24 10.24 2.049
3 70 0.75876 3800.2 2187.8 0.585 3691.4 1.94 12.21 2.441
4 65 0.64654 4165.8 1741.4 0.593 3732.2 1.65 11.40 2.280
5 60 0.54271 5254.1 1547.5 0.600 3299.3 1.39 12.07 2.414
6 55 0.44823 5517.4 1108.5 0.613 2842.3 1.15 10.47 2.094
7 50 0.3635 6839.7 903.7 0.625 2586.3 0.93 10.52 2.105
8 45 0.28856 7152.8 595.6 0.638 2271.1 0.74 8.74 1.747
9 40 0.22325 8477.9 422.5 0.650 1919.1 0.57 8.01 1.602
10 35 0.16726 8568.4 239.7 0.675 1580.9 0.43 6.07 1.213
11 30 0.12019 9992.8 144.4 0.700 1232.8 0.31 5.08 1.017
12 25 0.08161 10258.6 68.3 0.725 895.5 0.21 3.54 0.709
13 20 0.05106 12142.9 31.7 0.750 588.9 0.13 2.62 0.525
14 15 0.02807 12022.3 9.5 0.790 337.9 0.07 1.43 0.286
15 10 0.0122 15732.4 2.3 0.830 156.9 0.03 0.81 0.162
16 5 0.00298 13613.9 0.1 0.830 40.5 0.01 0.17 0.034
17 0
The dynamic loads are applied on the chimney model as shown below.
DATE: 31.05.18 NOTE NO. : 230/E/DN-02 (R0)
5 Analysis results
The analysis results are obtained in the form of axial force and bending moment values at each level.
Maximum deflection at the top for combined static and dynamic wind = 172.02mm
6 Design checks
6.1 Deflection check
The section is analysed using a working stress analysis program. The stresses in concrete and steel
(foundation bolts) are obtained as follows:
Maximum concrete stress = 2.73 MPa – OK for concrete grade 22 MPa.
Maximum steel stress = 73.52 MPa – OK for bolt.
Force in bolt = 73.52 × π / 4 × 20 2 = 23.1 kN.
3
Bond stress for 800mm long bolt = 23.1× 10 = 0.46 MPa.
π × 20 × 800
From IS: 456, permissible bond stress for M20 concrete is 0.8 MPa > 0.46, OK.
DATE: 31.05.18 NOTE NO. : 230/E/DN-02 (R0)
190.4 mm
23.1 kN
PL 23.1× 0.1904
M≈ =
8 8
= 1.1 kN.m
The resisting section is 75mm wide x 30mm thick.
M 1.1× 10 6 × 6 97.7 MPa < 165 MPa [5], OK
σb = = =
Z 75 × 30 2
23.1× 10 3 1
τ= × = 5.13 MPa <100, OK.
2 75 × 30
Hence, the base plate is found to be safe.
No. of
x piles Σx2
5 5 125
2.5 5 31.25
0 5 0
-2.5 5 31.25
-5 5 125
312.5
5671.1 12718.2 × 5
= ±
25 312.5
Pmax = 430.3 kN > 30 t pile capacity, FAIL
Pmin = 23.4 kN > 0, no uplift
Moment of resistance
2 2
MR = Qbd = 1.101 x 11000 x 1130
= 15465 kN.m > 3980.3, OK.
M
Reinforcement required =
σ st ⋅ j ⋅ d
3980.3 × 10 6 2 2
Bottom = = 23799 mm = 2163.5 mm /m
168 × 0.881× 1130
2
Provided reinforcement = T20 @ 150 c/c = 2094 mm /m, FAIL.
7 Conclusion
Stack structure and foundation have been checked for added loads due to strakes. The stack structure,
foundation bolts and base plate are found to be safe and serviceable. However, the foundation is found
to be overloaded. The capacity of pile is inadequate. Also, the reinforcement in the pile cap is inadequate
in bending.
8 References
13 FY -4.045
15 FY -3.047
17 FY -2.049
LOAD 2 LOADTYPE Wind TITLE STATIC WIND
MEMBER LOAD
16 LIN Y -1.22 -0.91
15 LIN Y -1.52 -1.22
14 LIN Y -1.81 -1.52
13 LIN Y -2.09 -1.81
12 LIN Y -1.96 -2.09
11 LIN Y -2.18 -1.96
10 LIN Y -2.38 -2.18
9 LIN Y -2.56 -2.38
8 LIN Y -2.73 -2.56
7 LIN Y -2.87 -2.73
6 LIN Y -2.99 -2.87
5 LIN Y -3.07 -2.99
4 LIN Y -3.09 -3.07
3 LIN Y -3.01 -3.09
2 LIN Y -3.19 -3.01
1 LIN Y -3.37 -3.19
LOAD 3 LOADTYPE Wind TITLE DYNAMIC WIND
MEMBER LOAD
16 UNI GX 1.064
15 UNI GX 2.049
14 UNI GX 2.441
13 UNI GX 2.280
12 UNI GX 2.414
11 UNI GX 2.094
10 UNI GX 2.105
9 UNI GX 1.747
8 UNI GX 1.602
7 UNI GX 1.213
6 UNI GX 1.017
5 UNI GX 0.709
4 UNI GX 0.525
3 UNI GX 0.286
2 UNI GX 0.162
1 UNI GX 0.034
LOAD COMB 4 COMBINATION LOAD CASE 4
1 1.0 2 1.0 3 1.0
PERFORM ANALYSIS
FINISH