Sei sulla pagina 1di 6

 , .

17:4: 305–309 (1997)

THE ASSOCIATION OF EARLY-ONSET FETAL


GROWTH RESTRICTION, ELEVATED
MATERNAL SERUM ALPHA-FETOPROTEIN,
AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF SEVERE
PRE-ECLAMPSIA
 . *   -†
*Vincent Memorial Obstetrics and Gynecology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital and †Department of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

Received 25 July 1996


Revised 28 October 1996
Accepted 5 November 1996

SUMMARY
From Antenatal Diagnostic Center referrals over 22 months, consultations for early-onset fetal growth restriction
versus skeletal dysplasia were retrospectively identified. Those with elevated maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein
(MSAFP) levels are the focus of this report. All had an early ultrasound confirming menstrual dates and subsequent
sonography at <28 weeks with at least two fetal biometric measures delayed by ¢2 standard deviations from mean
values. Of the five patients identified, the mean gestational age at the time of diagnosis of fetal growth restriction was
23·3&2·9 weeks. All had normal karyotypes and normal amniotic fluid AFP. None of the patients had evidence of
hypertension or pre-eclampsia at diagnosis of fetal growth restriction. All five gravidas subsequently developed
severe pre-eclampsia from 5·5 to 12·5 weeks after documentation of fetal growth delay. Three developed HELLP
syndrome. Pregnancies were continued a mean duration of 10·2 weeks, with all five delivering at preterm gestations
(mean=33·5&1·7 weeks) for maternal indications of severe pre-eclampsia. Unexplained early-onset fetal growth
restriction in conjunction with unexplained elevations of MSAFP together consistently heralded the subsequent
development of severe pre-eclampsia. ? 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
 : IUGR; MSAFP; pre-eclampsia

INTRODUCTION women with unexplained elevations of MSAFP


will have good pregnancy outcomes (Katz et al.,
For fetuses without sonographically identified 1990). By further defining the natural history of
structural defects, elevated levels of maternal such pregnancies and identifying covariate risk
serum alpha-fetoprotein (MSAFP) have been factors, obstetric management and possible thera-
associated with a variety of obstetrical complica- peutic interventions for these high-risk pregnancies
tions. These fetuses are at a greater risk of low with unexplained elevations of MSAFP will
birth weight (Brock et al., 1977; Wald et al., 1977), become clearer.
perinatal death, and hypertension or pre-eclampsia The increasing use and sophistication of ultra-
(Katz et al., 1990; Brazerol et al., 1994; Milunsky sound in obstetrics have resulted in improved
et al., 1989; Gordon et al., 1978), among other detection of structural defects and disorders of
measures of poor obstetrical outcome. Most fetal growth which can now be confidently ident-
ified prior to the third trimester. We have retro-
Correspondence to: Thomas D. Shipp, MD, Vincent
Memorial Obstetrics and Gynecology Service, Founders spectively identified pregnancies referred for
4—Massachusetts General Hospital, Fruit Street, Boston, MA intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) prior to 28
02114, U.S.A. weeks’ gestation. A subpopulation of this data set,

CCC 0197–3851/97/040305–05 $17.50


? 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
306 . .   . -
those growth-restricted fetuses with elevated Doppler flow determinations were obtained.
MSAFP, consistently developed subsequent severe Amniotic fluid was subjectively assessed. A thor-
pre-eclampsia, necessitating preterm delivery. ough fetal structural survey was performed on all
ultrasound examinations. All MSAFP levels were
assessed within the range of 15–22 weeks. Values
MATERIALS AND METHODS were adjusted for maternal weight and race, and
were reported as multiples of the median for the
From the Antenatal Diagnostic Center referrals specified gestational age at sample procurement.
at Brigham and Women’s Hospital over a Gestational age means are presented &1
22-month period from May 1993 through Febru- standard deviation.
ary 1995, 13 consultations for early-onset IUGR
versus skeletal dysplasia were identified. A subset
of the study population, those continuing IUGR RESULTS
pregnancies with unexplained elevations of second-
trimester MSAFP, constitutes the focus of this Thirteen patients were referred to the Antenatal
report. Diagnostic Center over the 22-month period for
Study inclusion criteria were (1) first or early early-onset IUGR versus skeletal dysplasia. Five
second-trimester ultrasound dating confirming of these 13 patients were identified for the study.
menstrual dates; (2) unexplained elevations of All five had unexplained elevations of MSAFP,
MSAFP ¢2·0 multiples of the median for the early-onset IUGR, and subsequently developed
gestational age; and (3) subsequent sonography at severe pre-eclampsia (Table I). Of the eight other
less than 28 weeks with at least two fetal biometric patients, none of the continuing pregnancies had
measures delayed by ¢2 standard deviations from unexplained elevations of MSAFP, and none
the mean for the gestational age (Merz et al., 1987; developed pre-eclampsia.
Tamura and Sabbagha, 1980). Pregnancies were The mean gestational age of diagnosis of IUGR
excluded if they were complicated by (1) pre- was 23·2&2·9 weeks (median=24·1 weeks). The
existing maternal hypertension or diabetes; (2) specific fetal biometric parameters used are repre-
maternal tobacco or drug use; (3) skeletal abnor- sented in Table I. All cases had a normal amniotic
malities suggesting severe dysplasia; (4) major fetal fluid volume at the time of diagnosis of IUGR, and
malformations; or (5) multiple gestations. one case (3) developed mild oligohydramnios by
The identified pregnancies were reviewed retro- the time of delivery. Three patients had umbilical
spectively for antenatal course, ultrasound artery Doppler wave forms that appeared normal;
findings, pregnancy outcome, maternal com- one case (3) showed absent diastolic flow; and
plications, and placental pathology. The classifi- another (4) showed decreased diastolic flow. These
cation of severe pre-eclampsia was made if one of patterns persisted throughout the pregnancy.
the following obstetrical criteria was present: (1) All fetuses were karyotyped via amniocentesis,
blood pressure ¢160/110 on two occasions at and all were found to have a normal karyotype
least 6 h apart; (2) urine protein of 3+ or more and normal amniotic fluid AFP levels. TORCH
and/or ¢5 g of urinary protein over 24 hours; (3) titres were unremarkable for four patients (1, 3, 4
oliguria with ¡500 cm3 urine output over 24 h; and 5). Anticardiolipin antibody and lupus antico-
(4) the presence of cerebral or visual disturbances agulant levels were obtained on three patients (2, 3
(ACOG, 1986). HELLP syndrome was diagnosed and 4), and were negative. Two patients were
when there was laboratory evidence of haemoly- begun on 81 mg of aspirin per day at the first
sis, elevated liver enzymes, and thrombocyto- ultrasound evidence of impaired fetal growth (23
penia. Fetal growth restriction was not included and 24·5 weeks), and it was continued through-
as a criterion for the diagnosis of severe out the pregnancies. All five women received
pre-eclampsia for this study. betamethasone prior to delivery.
All ultrasounds were performed with an Acuson All women had normal blood pressures early in
128 with a 3·5 MHz or 5 MHz variable focus gestation, and none had evidence of pre-eclampsia
transducer (Acuson, Mountain View, CA, U.S.A.). or hypertension at the time of diagnosis of IUGR.
Biometric measurements evaluated for fetal Two gravidas were nulliparas (3 and 5). The
growth included biparietal diameter, abdominal remaining three patients (1, 2, and 4) previously
circumference, and femur length. Umbilical artery delivered four appropriate-for-gestational-age
Table I—Clinical characteristics and outcomes of study pregnancies

Biometric parameters Gestational


Gestational (SD<mean) age at Gestational
age at Amniotic Umbilical diagnosis age at
MSAFP diagnosis fluid artery pre-eclampsia delivery
Patient (MOM) IUGR BPD AC FL volume Doppler Aspirin (weeks) (weeks) Outcome Placental pathology

1 2·5 27·0 0 2·0 2.0 Normal Normal No 35·7 35·9 Severe 360 g, multiple small placental
pre-eclampsia, infarcts, multiple intervillous
induction, thrombi, extensive intravillous
SVD, male, 1710 g fibrin, excessive umbilical cord
spiraling
2 2·4 24·1 2·8 2·0 5·6 Normal Normal Yes 32·3 32·4 HELLP syndrome, 310 g, multiple microscopic
induction, SVD, infarcts, intravillous fibrin,
female, 1260 g, focally extensive
grade I IVH
3 2·1 24·5 2·0 1·8 5·3 Normal (mild Absent Yes 30·0 31·5 HELLP syndrome, 190 g, multiple small marginal
  , 

oligohydramnios diastolic C/S, malpresenta- infarcts


at delivery) flow tion, female, 1050 g
4 8·3 20·3 3·2 — 4·0 Normal Decreased No 30·3 34·3 Severe pre- 300 g, multiple infarcts, largest
diastolic eclampsia, C/S, 9 cm
MSAFP

flow malpresentation,
female, 1365 g
5 3·1 20·5 2·0 — 2·0 Normal Normal No 33·0 33·3 HELLP syndrome, 180 g multiple small infarcts
C/S, non-reassuring
fetal testing,
female, 1415 g

MSAFP=maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein; MOM=multiples of median; IUGR=intrauterine growth restriction; BPD=biparietal diameter; AC=abdominal
circumference; FL=femur length; SD=standard deviation; SVD=spontaneous vaginal delivery; IVH=intraventricular haemorrhage; C/S=Caesarean section.
 -
307
308 . .   . -
infants at term. None of these prior pregnancies 2·5 MOM. Second, the use of a rigorous definition
had been complicated by pre-eclampsia. of fetal growth restriction, i.e. two biometric par-
The mean gestational age at the time of diagno- ameters with measurements ¢2 standard devia-
sis of pre-eclampsia was 32·3&2·1 weeks. Follow- tions from the mean for the gestation, was chosen
ing the ultrasound diagnosis of fetal growth delay, so as to identify clearly those fetuses with a dis-
pregnancies continued a mean duration of order of fetal growth. Third, it must be
9·0&2·3 weeks (range 5·5–12·5 weeks) until pre- re-emphasized that our study patients represent a
eclampsia was diagnosed. The mean gestational very select group of pregnancies complicated by
age at delivery was 33·5 weeks&1·7 weeks unexplained elevated MSAFP levels. Fourth, sev-
(median=33·3 weeks). Following the ultrasound eral weeks elapsed after the diagnosis of IUGR,
diagnosis of fetal growth restriction, pregnancies prior to the development of the clinical signs of
continued a mean duration of 10·2 weeks&3·0 pre-eclampsia. This provides less support for pre-
weeks (range 7–14 weeks, median=8·9 weeks). All eclampsia as aetiologic in the early-onset IUGR
pregnancies were delivered for severe pre- that we observed, unlike the IUGR which is more
eclampsia. Three pregnancies developed HELLP commonly identified late in gestation associated
syndrome (2, 3 and 5). The 5-min Apgar score was with pre-eclampsia.
more than 7 in all cases. All neonates were small As the amniotic fluid AFP levels were normal
for gestational age at delivery, and on newborn for the entire group, the most likely reason for the
examinations none was found to be dysmorphic, elevated MSAFP levels involves an abnormal pla-
nor were structural anomalies present. cental process. A placental pathology would be
Common to all placentae was the finding of consistent with a disease process which affected
multiple placental infarcts. These ranged from these fetuses with an early-onset growth restric-
microscopic to extensive and were found in each tion. All placentae showed multiple infarcts. Pla-
case. cental vascular lesions have been previously
associated with elevated MSAFP levels (Salafia et
al., 1988) and are commonly seen in pre-eclampsia
DISCUSSION and growth restriction (Gersell et al., 1987).
We have reviewed a subset of patients who were
Pregnancies at risk for low birth weight ident- predicted to be at higher risk for an abnormal
ified by unexplained elevations in MSAFP levels pregnancy outcome based on the elevated MSAFP
contribute only a small proportion to the popula- result. The identification of early-onset IUGR in
tion of low birth weight infants. Furthermore, these pregnancies appeared to further increase
whether low birth weight pregnancies with their risk for the development of severe pre-
elevated MSAFP levels are due to preterm delivery eclampsia. The fact that the growth restriction
and/or IUGR has been a matter of debate (Wald et antedated the development of severe pre-eclampsia
al., 1977; Davis et al., 1992; Waller et al., 1993; by a mean duration of 9·6 weeks is noteworthy and
Brazerol et al., 1994; Robinson et al., 1989). The may have implications for management. Two cases
association of elevated MSAFP, pre-eclampsia, (2 and 3) were begun on aspirin in the hope of
and subsequent low birth weight has been pre- improving outcome, though this was not initiated
viously suggested (Walters et al., 1983, 1985). In until the growth restriction was well established,
this study, however, the low birth weight was and no obvious improvement in outcome was
secondary to preterm delivery necessitated by pre- realized. As there seems to be a great risk for the
eclampsia rather than by IUGR. Our study differs development of severe pre-eclampsia, these preg-
in that we have chosen pregnancies with elevated nancies complicated by both unexplained eleva-
MSAFP levels and early-onset growth restriction tions in MSAFP and early-onset IUGR warrant
in which severe pre-eclampsia subsequently devel- close surveillance for maternal complications and
oped remote from the IUGR diagnosis. interventions in anticipation of a preterm delivery.
A few important points concerning our paper It has already been firmly established that preg-
deserve comment. First, we use a discriminating nancies with unexplained elevations of MSAFP
value of 2·0 MOM for our MSAFP screening; levels are at risk for pre-eclampsia and low birth
however, a number of centres use 2·5 MOM. At weight. We have identified a subset of women with
this level, two of our five patients would not have increased MSAFP in whom a covariate risk of
been identified as their MSAFP was between 2 and early-onset fetal growth restriction consistently
  ,  MSAFP  - 309
heralds the subsequent development of severe pre- Merz, E., Kim-Kern, M.-S., Pehl, S. (1987). Ultrasonic
eclampsia. Therapies to improve the outcome in mensuration of fetal limb bones in the second and
such cases remain to be investigated. third trimesters, J. Clin. Ultrasound., 15, 175–183.
Milunsky, A., Jick, S.S., Bruell, C.L., MacLaughlin,
D.S., Tsung, Y.K., Jick, H., Rothman, K.J., Willett,
W. (1989). Predictive values, relative risks, and overall
REFERENCES benefits of high and low maternal serum á-fetoprotein
screening in singleton pregnancies: new epidemiologic
ACOG (1986). Management of Preeclampsia, American data, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 161, 291–297.
College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Technical Robinson, L., Grau, P., Crandall, B.F. (1989). Preg-
Bulletin No. 91, Washington, DC: American College nancy outcomes after increasing maternal serum
of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. alpha-fetoprotein levels, Obstet. Gynecol., 74, 17–20.
Brazerol, W.F., Grover, S., Donnenfeld, A.E. (1994). Salafia, C.M., Silberman, L., Herrera, N.E., Mahoney,
Unexplained elevated maternal serum á-fetoprotein M.J. (1988). Placental pathology at term associated
levels and perinatal outcome in an urban clinic popu- with elevated midtrimester maternal serum
lation, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 171, 1030–1035. á-fetoprotein concentration, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.,
Brock, D.J.H., Barron, L., Jelen, P., Watt, M., 158, 1064–1066.
Scrimgeour, J.B. (1977). Maternal serum alpha- Tamura, R.K., Sabbagha, R.E. (1980). Percentile ranks
fetoprotein measurements as an early indicator of low of sonar fetal abdominal circumference measure-
birth-weight, Lancet, 2, 267–268. ments, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 138, 475–479.
Davis, R.O., Goldenberg, R.L., Boots, L., Hoffman, Wald, N., Cuckle, H., Stirrat, G.M., Bennett, M.J.,
H.J., Cooper, R., Cutter, G.R., Dubard, M.B., Cliver, Turnbull, A.C. (1977). Maternal serum alpha-
S.P., Smith, R.K. (1992). Elevated levels of midtrimes- fetoprotein and low birth-weight, Lancet, 2, 268–270.
ter maternal serum á-fetoprotein are associated with
Waller, D.K., Lustig, L.S., Smith, A.H., Hook, E.B.
preterm delivery but not with fetal growth retarda-
(1993). Alpha-fetoprotein: a biomarker for pregnancy
tion, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 167, 596–601.
outcome, Epidemiology, 4, 471–476.
Gersell, D.J., Kraus, F.T., Riffle, M.B. (1987). Diseases
Walters, B.N.J., Lao, T.T., Smith, V.A., Blau, K., de
of the placenta. In: Kurman, R.J. (Ed.). Blaustein’s
Swiet, M. (1983). Severe pre-eclampsia of early onset
Pathology of the Female Genital Tract, 3rd edn, New
(Letter), Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.), 287, 1302.
York: Springer-Verlag, 769–834.
Walters, B.N.J., Lao, T., Smith, V., de Swiet, M. (1985).
Gordon, Y.B., Grudzinskas, J.G., Kitau, M.J.,
á-Fetoprotein elevation and proteinuric pre-
Usherwood, M.M., Letchworth, A.T., Chard, T.
eclampsia, Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 92, 341–344.
(1978). Fetal wastage as a result of an alpha-
fetoprotein screening programme, Lancet, 1, 677–678.
Katz, V.L., Chescheir, N.C., Cefalo, R.C. (1990). Un-
explained elevations of maternal serum alpha-
fetoprotein, Obstet. Gynecol. Surv., 45, 719–726.

Potrebbero piacerti anche