Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
SUBJECT ASSIGNMENT:
APPROACHES TO LANGUAGE IN THE CLASSROOM CONTEXT
Group: 2017-06
Date: May 7th/2018
1
Assignment - ATL
INDEX
1. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………page 3
2. Contextualization ……….………………………………………….…...…....page 4
3. Language Generalizations ………………………………………..……….. page 5
3.1 Lexical use and students assumptions………………………..……….page 6
4. Learners individual factors and L2 acquiring process….….………...…....page 7
5. Language approaches and interlanguage………………………………….page
6. Conclusions and recommendations …………….………..……..………….page 15
7. Bibliography ………………………………………….………………………..page 16
2
Assignment - ATL
1. Introduction
3
Assignment - ATL
Bearing the above in mind, this essay is intended to analyze and understand
the causes of these cases mentioned before to boost students’ interlanguage process
and overcome generalization errors that students keep making despite their previous
knowledge, context, and interest on the language taught.
2. Contextualization
SUBJECT’S BACKGROUND
Data
DATA:Source: student compositions.
4
Assignment - ATL
wrong assumptions to a correct language use just because they have heard those
constructions before, but they do not know exactly how to place them based on the
tense and sentence context.
Nevertheless, it is very baffling how these students adapted the same errors
when their L1 is different from each other. English language assumptions may be
inferred despite the mother tongue, and leads to an overgeneralization of this language
due to its worldwide use (Richards, 1974 in Funiber, n.d.; p17). Subsequently, to
understand this overgeneralization issue, students’ lexical use on the L1 and L2,
together with their language assumptions, individual factors and interlanguage
awareness are going to be discussed throughout this document regarding this previous
data as an example.
3. Language Generalizations
Generalization in this context is understood as a language construction made
on the surface of its structure, which in most cases depends on the person’s
conception and inference of their mother language (Goldberg 2006). This concept is
related to second language learners owing to the interlanguage existed between the L1
and L2 the person possess. When this learner is constructing language structures in L2
everything that the L1 involves –lexicon, language distribution, sentence construction,
everyday speech and words systematization- affects its acquisition, thus
generalizations that are used frequently, become errors and may cause interlanguage
fossilization (Ellis, 1997).
Based on the data treated above it can be stated that the generalization
presented is on suffixes and prefixes –suffix a used on asleep-. There is a lack of
consciousness when using the gerund suffix in order to create whether it is a noun, a
verb or a participle adjective, consequently the learners showed in this exercise the
distinction between learning and acquiring; they apply the ing/ed suffixes because they
learnt it before, but did not acquire its actual use, they did not go from the explicit to the
implicit when applying this form (Krashen, 2009). Besides, word construction on
suffixes, a case of overuse is clearly depicted. Being gerunds a common verbal form
for students it is identified as a case of regularization and misinformation of a grammar
form (Ellis, 1997).
5
Assignment - ATL
In this respect Lexical use and students assumptions due to regularization could
be seen as the cause for this errors taking place, anyhow it is relevant to analyze each
point to understand why these assumptions where believed to be correct on first place.
zation
Overgenerali-
Regularization
misused
Lexical chunks
Activity data Error analysis
Soccer is the most common sporting. x There are two possibilities for this.
Firstly, student assumed that in
order to create a noun ing suffix
must be used (e.g. sailing, fishing,
housing). On the other hand, the
student overgeneralized ing as the
correct suffix to from this kind of
activities (e.g. swimming, running,
jogging, bowling, etc).
America refused continual supported x x The student seemed to confuse the
our military request. use of word constructions due to a
regularization of a common suffix
like ED. Students tend to associate
ed with past tense without bearing
ed as a participle form for
adjectives. Besides, there’s an
overgeneralization by taking
support as a verb adding the suffix
and omitting the actual verb –
refused-.
When he was 7 years old, he went x There a misinformation grammar
schooling. error here. The student could have
learnt about verbs followed by
gerunds and tried to apply this rule
here. However, schooling is a noun
and its ing form not possible in this
context. Furthermore, go is not a
verb that can be followed by a
gerund, instead it will need the use
of to followed by a noun.
About two hours driving eastern from x
Bangkok.
After finished my college studied, I x x
6
Assignment - ATL
went to my country.
Doctors have the right to removed it x x
from him.
There is a night for asleep. x
Moreover it may lead to conflicting. x
I am not going to get married when I will x
graduation the school.
Assignment instructions:
See the data collected below and answer the following questions:
1. Work out an IL generalization that might account for the forms in
boldface. Give your reasons for postulating this generalization.
2. What strategy/strategies do you think these learners have come up with
regarding lexical use?
3. What additional information, if any, would you like to have from these
learners to test your hypothesis?
4. How do these tests and results relate to the concepts studied in this
subject?
Do not answer the questions one by one, but address all of them in essay form.