November 17, 2003 Chief Legal Counse! Kimberly S, Budd Daniel B. Winslow and Robert W. Iuliano William J. Meade, General Counsel Department Jamey Tesler, Harvard University, April Powell-Willingham, Holyoke Center - Suite 980 Judi Goldberg, 1350 Massachusetts Ave Cathy Judd-Stein, Cambridge, MA 02138 Office of the Governor Room 360 State House Kelly A. Timilty Boston, MA 02133 15 Virgil Road Phone 617 725-4040 West Roxbury, Ma 02132 Sirs, Madams, From this point on you can never claim ignorance of the facts. Although we all know that you people have been well aware of my concerns for quite some time, now you know that I can prove it. I demand that you obey the rules of Professional Conduct after your review of the enclosed documents. Iam asking you the same questions that I have asked ‘every U.S. Attorney in the USA. I have received enough responses from various sources to go forward with many complaints in federal courts. I will be complaining of every member of the General Court of Massachusetts including Governor Romney, several employees of Harvard Law School and perhaps the School itself. T have enclosed many documents for your review to support the fact that I am as serious as a heart attack. If you wish to view more documents, check the Dean's Office at Harvard or Robert Creedon's office in the State House. There are many at both locations. If you wish to be more up to date, check the website mentioned within the documents. Tf you ignore or go against me, you are no more to me than just another paragraph in my next complaints. I hold lawyers in great contempt for obvious reasons. This is your last chance to act ethically before the shit hits the fan. The Kickhams practiced the same crimes again within the Norfolk Probate Court. More complaints are to follow likely long before the first complaints are legally heard. The facilitation or assistance to the felonies of a lawyer is particularly shameful when practiced by a lawyer employed in public service. One politician betraying the public trust is bad but every one is truly evil. Kimberly S. Budd knows John O. Mirick, a fellow Judicial Nominating Commission Council Member, and Ms. Carpenter, the president-elect of Boston Bar Association. Both are litigants against me. Robert W. Iuliano was an associate at Choate, Hall & Stewart, he must know Mr. Tripp. He also worked as an Assistant U. S. Attorney in Boston prosecuting violations of federal money laundering laws. He also clerked for Levin H. Campbell, then Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals. He must understand my allegations under the First, Fourth and Seventh Amendments.Alll of you know the Governor. Do the Rico Laws mean anything to you? Tf not consider this. If you do not conduct yourself professionally, the people whose Fourth Amendment Rights have been violated on the recording that you now possess may have a bone to pick with you as well. There is evidence of many crimes in Robert Creedon's office. Go look before I force you to argue it. Byway of Kelly A. Timilty, the Governor's Council and Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey have been properly notified. A copy of the tape numbered 139 was not sent to ‘Timitty because she is not a lawyer. She can inform her relatives Walter Timilty Sr. and ‘Jr. that we are now deep into Round Two. Thus far they have only dealt with jabs from me. My haymakers come in Round Three. The clerk will understand the message. In lieu of the recording, I am sending Ms. Timilty copies of Judge Carey's judgment over one year ago, a copy of the Kickhams Court Ordered Redone Accounts and a copy of my ‘timely opposition as an interested party with the supporting affidavit. Also included are. a couple of my letters that were sent to her relatives that have gone unanswered. Ms. Timilty does represent our family she should council the Governor on our behalf about my complaints of him. She can say what wishes to her kin. The fact that I have sent these documents to Kimberly S. Budd does a triple duty for me. Harvard University, the Boston Bar Association and the Judicial Nominating Commission have been informed that we have some serious issues to resolve. Chief Legal Counsel, Daniel B. Winslow, and his staff should start boning up on federal law. Mitt ain't a lawyer. To me he is just another man from Utah that happens to like to ski and play politics. When we first crossed paths, he was confused as to where he lives or how much taxes to pay. The records do not confuse me. I like Utah. I don't mind going back. Hopefully the folks federal court there ain't as crooked as the Yankees in New England, Anyone remember why the Mormons split for Utah? They do believe in Freedom of Religion. I won't confuse Mitt anymore. I must speak to his lawyers. Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter sent to every U.S. Attorney in the USA just prior to the malicious side show held before Judge Borenstein in Norfolk Superior Court on September 29". I suspect the recent developments about the SEC and the FBI in Beantown have caused him to delay his judgments of long delayed motions that he had no jurisdiction to hear. He need not be advised as to whether or not to dismiss Prima Facia complaints that belong in federal court. The irrefutable evidence supporting the allegations were filed and served with the complaints. He knew the truth when he read what remained of the dockets. The clerks’ actions in all courts were evil. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in cued as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. JM) Vk fiyaw— Cyall in Court Oy VAM Dovid R. Amos 153 Alvin Ave. Milton, MA. 02186P.S. Think quick, I don't have wait six months for an answer from you, like I do from a FED. Have you heard Mr. Galvin squawking about the SEC lately? How about any squeaks from Mr. Nester? It appears that T am the only one having any fun. You do understand that politicians come and go every four years. However, you must keep working for a living long after they have had their way with our world. I will sue any lawyer that defends Mitt without affirming my Prima Facia complaint. By the time that you read this letter I will be out of the State and on my way to Miami to give the U.S. Attorney and some lawyers a bunch of tapes. the Say hey to Mr. Fredrickson, the not so gay Robb Quinan and my wicked sister-in-law Tara O'Meara for me.U.S. Postal Service’ Delivery Confirmation’ Receipt 8 Postage and Dovery Comat ees must be pat before main, ‘Sort Ta (be competed ym wg becly 5 bud 1350 p35 Avid Suite 4 Cambrids MA Oriae ss ig POSTAL CUSTOMER: 8 Keep ths eo forages: ge Poa ‘ects inmate stat. 2 tspacor® i E ove veno-22-.e1t i CHECK ONE (POSTAL USE ONLY) £ [Gerirty aasendce 5 (Fret ctess tte? porcat [Tlaciage Servos pret ‘Pao 8, ay 2002 {Bee rer)U.S. Postal Service’ Delivery Confirmation Receipt y_Postoge and DtveryContinaton es must be paid before mang, Ail Seno (te cole by ma i Dawriel B. Wis lous we State Hews Row 360 ES Voston MA 02133 gS POSTAL CUSTOMER: 8 Bis on For bras a2 Poamars eos iene web stead ad " rwusps.com® ah arent 00222-4811 a ceacone (rosa. eon 5 AP esty tat” Service 5 [rirst-class tai? parcel LC ipsckage Services parcet Perm 15, ay 2002 (Geena)U.S. Postal Service" Delivery Confirmation’ Receipt sr Postage and Dvr Conan fs mus bo pal bof mei are Sane To: oe coms ty man) a "Kelly A tim ty ba TS Virgil) Rowe BS wrest Roxbury Mn 03d es Koop sal rec 35 Pograr ‘Access internet web site at ia ‘CHEK OME (POSTAL USE OMLY) a oily Wall”Service ae (Ciriret-ciass Mai? parce! (package Services parcel em 15 ty ce (SreePage I of 1 David Amos ‘avid Arnos” Friday, January 18, 2002 3:22 AM Subject: religious persecution have a very interesting problem that may help with your education. is concerned with religious freedom from persecution,ethics, civil law,criminal law and farnly feuds.To say the least itis very interesting and if | choose to disclose the parties involved no doubt | will aise some eyebrows. This involves a trustee of a ttust of which my family is @ beneficary and the lawyer that helped him to co this. Both are members of a prominent local family in religious and legal circles.in a nutshell the trustee(my uncle by marriage) in his accounting of the trust gave funds from the trust several fimes to his church charties which #6 cleariy illegal under criminal law The fawyer (his cousin land mine by marriage) made this possible by sliding it past tho probate simply cause they don't check his work because of his reputation Let alone it being illegal they knew full wellit would offend me.For | have no faith in their church and refuse to allow my children to be exposed to it and it offends them that | stick to my rights on this. have been shunned by them they have never spoken to me or my kids and so forth and so be it | prefered if that way for | never wish to be where | am not welcome, However this does not give them the right to steal money from Us and give it to their church. | am forced to proceed on this matter Pro se for we are as poor as church mice and, they are millionaices but | am going to do it anyway cause | am so pissed offi is the only way | can calm my ‘SouLIf you are interested in speaking with me and seeing proot| would expect it to be held in confidence Any help you could offer would be much appreciated Best Regards ave Loriei03From: "David Amos" To: Subject: religious persecution Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 02:22:20 -0500 MIME-Version’ 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative: boundary’ = NextPart_000_0008_G1C19FC6,P&BC32C0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018. 1300 X-MimeOLE; Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00,3018 1300) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -_NextPart_000_0005_01C19FC6.FaBC32C0. Content-Type: text/plain charset="iso-8859- 1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thave a very interesting problem that may help with your = education.It is concerned with religious freedom from persecution,ethics, civil law.criminal law and family feuds, To say the = least itis very interesting and if | choose to disclose the patties = involved no doubt I will raise some eyebrows This involves a trustee of" a trust of which my family is a beneficary and the lewyer that helped = him to do this. Both are members of a praminent local family in religions = and legal circles In @ nutshell the trustee(my uncle by marriage) in his = accounting of the trust gave funds from the trust several times to his church charties which is clearly illegal uncer criminal law The lawys (his cousin and mine by marriage) made this possible by slidir the probate simply cause they don't check his work because of his reputation,Let alone it being illegal they knew full well it would = offend me.For I have no faith in their church and refuse to allow my children to be exposed ta it and it offends them that I stick to my rights on this.{ have been shunned by them they have never spoken to me = or my kids and so forth and so be it | prefered it that way for | never wish to be where | am not welcome, However this does not give them the = right to steal money from us and give it to their church, fam forced 10 ~ proceed on this matter Pro se for we are as poor as church mice and they = are millionaires but Lam going to do it anyway cause 1 am so pissed of = it is the only way I can calm my soul. If you are interested in speaking = with me and seeing proof'| would expect il to be held in contidence Any = help you could offer would be much appreciated. Best Revards=20 Dave past = __NextPart_000_0005_01C19FCo.FaBC32C0 ntent-Type: text/htanl, charset="is0-B859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable C<{DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-/AW3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN 3D"MSHTML 5.00.3018,900" name=3DGENERATOR™ &enbsp:nbsp, | have a very interesting = problem that=20 may help with your education.tt is concerted with religious freedom from = persecution,ethics, civil law.criminal law and family feuds.To say the = least it=20 is very interesting and if | choose to disclose the patties involved no = doubt I=20 will raise some eyebrows This involves a trustee of a trust of which my=20 familyéenbsp.is a beneficary and the lawyer that helped him to de this, Both art members of a prominent local family in religious and legal eircles.In a= rmutshell=20 the trustee(my unele by marriage) in bis accounting of the trust gave ~ funds from=20 the trust several times to his church charties which is clearly illegal = under=20 criminal law The lawyer (his cou: possible by=20 sliding it past the probate simply cause they don't check his work ~ because of-20 his reputation Let alone it being illegal they knew full well it would ~ offend=20 me.For [have no faith in their church and refisse to allow my children = to be=20 exposed to it and :it offends them that [ istick to my rights on = this. I-20 have been shunned by them they have never spoken to me oF my kids and so = forth=20 and so be it | prefered it that way for | never wish to be whereatabsp:l ~ am not=20 welcome, However this does not give them the right to steal money from us = and=20 ive it to their church. am forced to proceed on this matter Pro se = for we ar as poor as church mice and they are millionaires but 1am going to do it = ancl mine by marriage) made this cause | am so pissed off it is the only way I can calm my soul. 1 you = are=20 interested in speakil held in=20 with me and seeing proof | waukd expeet it 10 heconfidence. Any help you could offer woukd be much appreciated