Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ON MYCOREMEDIATION OF
SYNTHETIC DYES BY DESIGN
OF EXPERIMENTS
A PROJECT REPORT
Submitted by
ABIVARMA.R.S (Register
ister No. 0910204002
0910204002)
BAHEERATHAN.M (Register
ister No. 0910204008
0910204008)
SHIVASHANKAR.R (Register
ister No. 0910204041
0910204041)
A PROJECT REPORT
Submitted by
ABIVARMA.R.S (Register No. 0910204002
0910204002)
BAHEERATHAN.M (Register No. 0910204008
0910204008)
SHIVASHANKAR.R (Register
ister No. 0910204041
0910204041)
ANNA UNIVERSITY:
UNIVERSITY CHENNAI 600 025
MAY 2013
i
ANNA UNIVERSITY : CHENNAI 600 025
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
SIGNATURE SIGNATURE
Chinnavedampatti Chinnavedampatti
____________________ _____________________
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Firstly, we express our most sincere thanks to The Lord Almighty, for
his blessings.
Finally, we express our most heartfelt thanks to all our friends and
family members for their encouragement and support.
iii
ABSTRACT
iv
ஆ சார
v
Box Benkhen Design for Rhizopus stolonifer
4.6 49
vs Acid green
Box Benkhen Design for Fusarium
4.7 54
moniliforme vs Acid Green
5 CONCLUSION 61
APPENDICES 62
REFERENCES 64
vi
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
TITLE
No. No.
2.1 Consolidated literature results of dye degradation using Fungi 26
2.2 Consolidated literature results of dye degradation using Fungi 27
3.6.1 Actual levels of variables tested with Plackett-Burman design 32
3.6.2 Plackett Burman Matrix for seven factors and eight experiments 33
4.1 Screening experimental results for dye degradation 35
4.2 Plackett Burman experimental Design 40
4.3 Plackett Burman experimental Design 41
4.4 Plackett Burman experimental Design 42
4.5 Process variables and level used for Box Behnken Design 43
4.6 Box Behnken experimental design 44
Model coefficients estimated by multiple linear regression and
4.7 45
analysis of variance
Regression coefficients and significance of response surface
4.8 46
quadratic model
4.9 Process variables and level used for Box Behnken Design 49
4.1 Box Behnken experimental design 50
Model coefficients estimated by multiple linear regression and
4.11 51
analysis of variance
Regression coefficients and significance of response surface
4.12 51
quadratic model
4.13 Process variables and level used for Box Behnken Design 55
4.14 Box Behnken experimental design 55
Model coefficients estimated by multiple linear regression and
4.15 56
analysis of variance
Regression coefficients and significance of response surface
4.16 57
quadratic model
A1.1 Composition of Potato sucrose Agar 62
A1.2 Composition of Potato Dextrose Agar 62
A1.3 Composition of Malt extract agar 62
A1.4 Composition of Czapek Yeast extract Agar –CYA 63
A1.5 Composition of Czapek Concentrate 63
A1.6 Composition of Yeast Extract Peptone Dextrose 63
vii
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE PAGE
TITLE
No. No.
4.1 Standard curve for Acid green 34
4.2 Standard curve for Basic violet 35
4.3 Growth curve of Fusarium oxysporum 37
4.4 Growth curve of Penicillium citrinum 37
4.5 Growth curve of Rhizopus stolonifer 38
4.6 Growth curve of Trichoderma viride 38
4.7 Growth curve for Fusarium moniliforme 39
4.8 Growth curve for Aspergillus terreus 39
4.9 Effect Vs Variables 42
Response Surface and contour plot for time vs. dye concentration for
4.1 47
at constant inoculum size on % dye removal
Response Surface and contour plot for dye concentration vs.
4.11 48
inoculum size at constant time on % dye removal
Response Surface and contour plot for time vs. inoculum size for at
4.12 48
constant dye concentration on % dye removal
Response Surface and contour plot of for temperature vs. dye
4.13 52
concentration for at constant inoculum size on % dye removal
Response S
4.14 urface and contour plot for dye concentration vs. inoculum size at 53
constant temperature on % dye removal
Response Surface and contour plot for temperature vs. inoculum size
4.15 54
for at constant dye concentration on % dye removal
Response Surface and contour plot of for agitation speed vs. dye
4.16 58
concentration for at constant pH on % dye removal
Response Surface and contour plot for dye concentration vs. pH at
4.17 59
constant agitation speed on % dye removal
Response Surface and contour plot for pH vs. agitation speed for at
4.18 59
constant dye concentration on % dye removal
viii
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Overview
1.1.1 DYES
Dyes are colored substances, which are used along with a mordant to
give color to fibers.There are many classes of dyes.
1
Azo Dyes
Azo dyes constitute the most versatile and largest class of synthetic
dyes employed commercially in the textile and food industries. More than
2000 different azo dyes are used to dye various materials, such as textile,
leather, plastic, cosmetics, and food. These are characterized by the
presence of one or more azo bonds (-N<=>N-) in association with one or
more aromatic systems that may also carry sulfonic acid groups. These are
also the most common class of dyes released into aquatic and terrestrial
environments through the effluents, resulting in the contamination of rivers
and ground water. Cationic dyes are more toxic, followed by anionic acid
and direct dyes.
Phthalocyanine Dyes
Anthraquinone Dyes
Heterocyclic Dyes
Triphenylmethane Dyes
(a)Physicochemical Methods
Degradation by Bacteria
Degradation by Actinomycetes
1.2 Motivation
It has been two years since the Madras High Court delivered a
landmark judgment ordering the closure of dyeing and bleaching units in
the Tirupur knitwear cluster for polluting the river Noyyal for decades. The
order was pronounced solely because the dyeing fraternity did not adhere
to the zero liquid discharge (ZLD) norms despite the directions from the
Supreme Court and High Court. According to the Tamil Nadu Pollution
Control Board, over 200 illegal units were identified in Tirupur as well as
the nearby districts of Namakkal, Erode and Salem .This closure of dyeing
8
units though directed towards the welfare of the environment and public
safety resulted in job losses. Since the demand for textiles is always on the
high, a suitable solution would be to develop a feasible method for
degrading the various dyes used in these industries .Thus, we were
motivated towards finding a biological alternative to the various
physiochemical dye degradation processes and fungi with all their
diversity, proved to be the perfect comrade for our mission.
1.3 Objectives
9
CHAPTER 2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Aspergillus foetidus
10
Bjerkandera adusta
Candida zeylanoidis
11
Almost any organ or system in the body can be affected. Candidiasis
may be superficial and local or deep-seated and disseminated.
Disseminated infections arise from hematogenous spread from the
primarily infected locus. Candida zeylanoidis is used to decolorize 85 %
of Orange II (Yesilada et al, 2003) and 90 % of Methyl orange (
Yesilada et al, 2003).
Coriolus versicolor
12
Red RR (Yi Chin Toh et al., 2003), Remazol Blue RR (Yi Chin Toh et
al., 2003), Everzol Turquoise Blue G (Kapdan and Kargi, 2002),
Astrazone Black FDL (Yesilada et al., 2003) and Astrazone Red FBL
(Yesilada et al., 2003). (Kapdan and Kargi, 2002; Yesilada et al., 2003;
Levin et al., 2004; Sanghi et al., 2006; Yesilada 1995; Yi Chin Toh et
al., 2003; Christian et al 2005 ). 82% of Everzol Turquoise Blue G, 89%
of Astrazone Black FDL, 98% of Astrazone Red FBL, 43 % of Remazol
Briliant Blue R, and 88% of Malachite green dye has been degraded.
Cunninghamella elegans
13
Orange II (Ambrosio and Takaki ,2004), Reactive Red 198 (Ambrosio
and Takaki ,2004), Malachite green (Chang-Jun Cha et al, 2001) .
Cunninghamella elegans decolorized 40 % of Reactive Black 5, 88 %
of Orange II,75% of Reactive Red 198 ,85 % of Malachite green.
(Chang-Jun Cha et al, 2001; Ambrosio and Takaki ,2004).
Debaromyces polymorphus
14
shellfish, etc. Debaryomyces polymorphus decolorized 98.9 % of
Reactive Black 5 dye.( Yang et al, 2005)
Funalia trogii
15
Geotrichum sp
16
Irpex lacteus
Laetiporus sulphurous
Phanerochaete chrysosporium
18
6-9 µm in diameter and are borne by poorly differentiated branched
conidiophores.
19
pollutants [Pazarlioglu et al, 2004]. The white rot fungus P.
chrysosporium MTCC 787 was obtained from the Culture Collection of
Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India and the stock
cultures were maintained by periodic subculture on malt agar medium at
48C[Radha et al, 2005]. 95 % of Astrazone Black FDL (Yesilada et al,
2003), 97 % of Astrazone Blue FGRL (Yesilada et al, 2003), 99 % of
Astrazone Red FBL(Yesilada et al, 2003), Reactive Black 5 (Ali
Mazmanci and Ali Unyayar,2005), 98.5 % of amaranth (red) (Chagas
and Durrant ,2001), 95 % of new coccine (red) (Chagas and Durrant
,2001), 96.8 % of orange G (orange) (Chagas and Durrant ,2001) ,60 %
of tartrazine (yellow), (Chagas and Durrant ,2001), 95 % of Remazol
Blue RR (Toh Yi-Chin et al,2003) , 97 % of Remazol Red RR (Toh Yi-
Chin et al,2003) ,50 % of Remazol Yellow RR (Toh Yi-Chin et
al,2003), 98 % of Acid orange (Radha et al ,2005), 89 % of Acid red
114 (Radha et al ,2005), 98 % of Methyl violet (Radha et al ,2005), 75
% of Acid green (Radha et al ,2005), 86 % of Methylene blue (Radha et
al ,2005) , 91 % of Vat magenta (Radha et al ,2005), 54 % of Congo
red(Radha et al ,2005),75 % of Indigo Blue (Balan and Monteiro,
2001), 90 % of crystal violet ( Bumpus and Brock, 1988),73 % of
Reactofix Gold Yellow ( Capalash and Sharma, 1992),54 % of congo
Red (Ollikka et al ,1993),99 %of Orange II (Cripps et al ,1990).
20
Reactive black 5 was also removed by Pleurotus florida (Mazmanci
Ünyaya, 2005)
Pleurotus ostreatus
Pleurotus sajor-caju
21
amaranth, new coccine and orange G, but only grew on the solid
medium containing tartrazine that was not visibly decolorized. This
mushroom is cultivated on a wide range of plant wastes (cereal straw,
sawdust, bagasse, waste cotton) often enclosed by plastic bags.
Mushroom production is light dependent. Some growers operate a 12
hour light cycle using fluorescent lamps. Pleurotus mushrooms are the
second most important mushrooms in production in the world, 25% of
total world production of cultivated mushroom. Pleurotus sajor-caju
decolorized 94 % of Indigo Blue, 80 % of Astrazone Black FDL, 97 %
of Astrazone Blue FGRL and 99 % of Astrazone Red FBL. ( Balan et
al., 2001 ; Yesilada et al., 2003).
Pleurotus pulmonarius
22
Pleurotus populinus, which is restricted to growing on aspen and
cottonwood (genus Populus)
Phlebia tramallosa
23
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
24
Thelephora sp.
25
Table 2.1: Consolidated literature results of dye degradation using
Fungi
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Cunninghamella elegans
Pycnoporus sanguineus
Pleurotus pulmonarius
Laetiporus sulphureus
Pleurotus sajor-caju
Candida zeylanoidis
Aspergillus foetidus
Bjerkandera adusta
Pleurotus ostreatus
Coriolus versicolor
Tramates cingulata
Phlebia tramallosa
Pleurotus eryngii
Pleurotus florida
Microorganism
Phanerochaete
Thelephora sp.
chrysosporium
Geotrichum sp
Funalia trogii
Irpex lacteus
Remazol
Briliant Blue - - - 43 - - 100 - 75 - - - - - - - - -
R -
Indigo Blue - - - - - - - 94 75 - - 94 - - - - - - -
Congo Red - - - - - - - - - 54 - - - - - - 97 - -
Reactive
- - - - - - - - - 76 - - - - - - - - -
Blue 15 -
Orange G - - - - - - - - - 97 - - - - - - 33 - -
Reactive
- - - - 40 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Black 5 -
Orange II - - # - 88 - - - - 99 - - - - - - - - -
Reactive Red
- - - - 75 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
198 -
Malachite
- - - 88 85 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
green -
Azure B - - - 78 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Remazol
Brilliant - - - 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Violet -
Acid Orange - - - - - - - - - 98 - - - - - - - - - -
Acid Red
- - - - - - - - - 89 - - - - - - - - -
114 -
Vat magenta - - - - - - - - - 91 - - - - - - - - - -
Acid green - - - - - - - - - 75 - - - - - - - - - -
Methylene
- - - - - - - - - 86 - - - - - - - - -
Blue -
Methyl
- - - - - - - - - 98 - - - - - - - - -
Violet -
Crystal violet - - - 92 - - - - - 90 - - - - - - - - - -
Poly R 478 - - - 30 - - - - - 46 - - - - - - - - - -
Poly T 128 - - - - - - - - - 48 - - - - - - - - - -
Reactofix
- - - - - - - - - 73 - - - - - - - - -
Gold Yellow -
Bromophenol
- - - - - - - - - 93 - - - - - - - 99 -
blue -
Amido Black - - - - - - - - - - 99 - - - - - - - - -
xylidine - - - 28 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Carmine
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Indigo -
Methyl
- - # - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
orange -
Reactive
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Black 5 -
Remazol Red
- - - 96 - - - - - 97 - - - - - - - - -
RR -
Remazol
- - - 96 - - - - - 95 - - - - - - - - -
Blue RR -
Reactive blue
- - - 99 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
19 -
Reactive blue
- - - 99 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
49 -
SN4R - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
26
Table 2.2: Consolidated literature results of dye degradation using
Fungi
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Cunninghamella elegans
Pycnoporus sanguineus
Pleurotus pulmonarius
Laetiporus sulphureus
Pleurotus sajor-caju
Candida zeylanoidis
Aspergillus foetidus
Bjerkandera adusta
Pleurotus ostreatus
Coriolus versicolor
Tramates cingulata
Phlebia tramallosa
Pleurotus eryngii
Pleurotus florida
Microorganism
Phanerochaete
Thelephora sp.
chrysosporium
Geotrichum sp
Funalia trogii
Irpex lacteus
SN4R - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Reactive black
- - - 98 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5 -
Remazol
Brilliant Blue - - - 95 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
R -
Acid Black - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PolyR478 - - - - - - - - - 81 - - - - 55 - - - - -
Remazol Blue - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 89 - - -
Remazol Black - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 62 - - -
Remazol Red - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 77 - - -
Congo Red - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 93 - - - - -
Trypan Blue - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 95 - - - - -
Amido Black - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 89 - - - - -
Methylene
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 57 - - - -
Blue -
Ethyl violet - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 88 - - - - -
Methyl violet - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 93 - - - - -
Drimarene Red 65 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Drimarene
72 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Navy Blue
Drimarene
70 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Black
Methyl green - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 95 - - - - -
Brilliant Cresyl
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 90 - - - -
Blue -
Direct Blue 15 - - - - - - - - - 75 - - - - - - - - - -
Drimarine dyes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 99 -
Cibracon
- 85 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 79 - - -
Yellow CR -
Reactive Red
- - - - - - 90 - - - - - - - - - - - -
158 -
Reactive
- - - - - - 95 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Yellow 27 -
Acid orange - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Acid green - - - - - - - - - 75 - - - - - - - - - -
orange G - - - - - - - - - - - - - 97.2 - - - - - -
crystal violet - - - - - - - - 86 - - - - 91.2 - - - - - -
amaranth - - - - - - - - - - - - - 97.2 - - - - - -
Everzol
Turquoise Blue - - - 82 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
G -
Astrazone
- - - 89 - 94 - - - 95 - 75 80 - - - - - - 84
Black FDL
Astrazone Blue
- - - - - 92 - - - 97 - 75 97 - - - - - - 89
FGRL
Astrazone Red
- - - 98 - 97 - - - 99 - 97 99 - - - - - - 97
FBL
Reactive Blue
- - - - - - - - - 83 - - - - - - - - -
19 (RBBR) -
Reactive Black
- - - - - 99 80 - - 21 10 40 - - - - - - -
5 -
27
28
CHAPTER 3
MATERIALS AND METHODS
28
3.2.2 Immersion in distilled water:
1. Using sterile pipette tips, discs or blocks were cut down from the
growing culture.
2. These discs were transferred in 50 mL injection bottles with 25 mL
distilled water.
3. The bottles were then sealed with rubber corks and paraffin wrapped
and preserved at 4C.
30
3006, Aspergillus ochraceus MTCC 1810 and Penicillium citrinum
MTCC 8009, Saccharomyces cerevisiae MTCC 2376, Kluyveromyces
maxianus MTCC 4059 and Trichoderma reesei MTCC 3193 were
screened for dye degradation.
31
Eight run PBD with 7 factors were tested for their effects on dye
degradation. Low and high levels were assigned for each variable (table
3.1). The experimental design for mycoremediation of dyes is shown in
table 3.2. The percentage (%) dye removal was used as the response in
this design. The significance of variables was determined by calculating
their effects on dye removal. The dye removal percentage for each
experiment was calculated using the formula,
( )
Percentage dye removal =
B Volume of water(mL) 25 30
C Time(days) 2 4
D Temperature(°C) 27 37
E pH 4 9
32
Table 3.6.2: Plackett Burman Matrix for seven factors and eight
experiments
Variables
Experiments
A B C D E F G
1 H H L H L L H
2 H H H L H L L
3 L H H H L H L
4 L L H H H L H
5 H L L H H H L
6 L H L L H H H
7 H L H L L H H
8 L L L L L L L
33
CHAPTER 4
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
0.35
y = 1.2371x
0.3 R² = 0.9949
0.25
0.2
A610
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3
Concentration (mg/mL)
34
0.25
0.2 y = 0.7887x
R² = 0.9893
0.15
A590
0.1
0.05
0
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3
Concentration (mg/mL)
Drimarene
Acid green
turquoise
(BM)
DYE
(AG)
(BV)
(DT)
FUNGI
Penicillium citrinum + + + + -
Aspergillus terreus + + - - -
Aspergillus ochraceus + + - - -
Fusarium oxysporum + + + + -
Saccharomyces cerevisciae + + + + -
Trichoderma reesei - - - - -
Trichoderma viride + + - + -
Kluyveromyces marxianus + + - - -
Rhizopus stolonifer + - - + -
Mucor racemosus + - - + -
Fusarium moniliforme + + - - -
35
Eleven fungal species were selected and their degradation effect on 1
acidic, 2 basic and 2 reactive dyes were screened (Table 4.1). Twenty
five combinations showed decolourisation. Twelve combinations which
showed maximal dye decolourisation were selected for optimization
using Plackett- Burman design. The selected combinations were as
follows:
Penicillium citrinum vs acid green
Penicillium citrinum vs basic violet
Fusarium oxysporum vs acid green
Fusarium oxysporum vs basic violet
Aspergillus terreus vs acid green
Aspergillus terreus vs basic violet
Fusarium moniliforme vs acid green
Fusarium moniliforme vs basic violet
Rhizopus stolonifer vs acid green
Rhizopus stolonifer vs basic violet
Trichoderma viride vs acid green
Trichoderma viride vs basic violet
36
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
A600
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48
-0.1
Time (h)
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
A600
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48
-0.2
Time (h)
37
Trichoderma viride (fig 4.6) was at log phase at 1st hour following its
inoculation and showed maximum growth at approximately 24 hours
after the initial inoculation and the mid log phase is between 10th to 13th
hour. From these observations mid log phase cultures were used for dye
degradation experiments.
0.6
0.5
0.4
A 600
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time(h)
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
A 600
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time(h)
38
and mid-log phase was at 16th hour. From these observations mid log
phase cultures were used for dye degradation experiments.
1
0.8
0.6
A600
0.4
0.2
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
-0.2
Time (Hours)
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
A600
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
-0.1
Time (Hours)
39
(Table 4.2 and 4.3). Using the percentage removal the effect of each
variable on dye decolourisation was calculated. A graph was plotted
between effect and variable as shown in Fig 4.9 for significant variables.
The best combination and 3 significant variables were selected for
further optimization using BBD.
From PBD results (Fig 4.9) it is clear that dye concentration, time
and inoculum size were the significant factors for degradation of acid
green by Penicillium citrinum. Similarly, for acid green degradation by
Fusarium oxysporum, the significant factors were dye concentration,
inoculum size and time. Dye concentration, pH and agitation speed had
maximum effects on basic violet degradation on Penicillium citrinum
and basic violet degradation by Fusarium oxysporum was mainly
impacted by dye concentration, temperature and pH.
Table 4.2: Plackett Burman experimental Design
Variables Percentage dye removal
Trial
A B C D E F G AG Vs FO AG Vs PC BV Vs FO BV Vs PC
1 H H L H L L H 95 45 0 43.8
2 H H H L H L L 55 60 0 0
3 L H H H L H L 0 50 0 0
4 L L H H H L H 8 75 45.8 0
5 H L L H H H L 70 33.3 31.5 12.5
6 L H L L H H H 0 20 0 0
7 H L H L L H H 38 50 31.2 87.5
8 L L L L L L L 50 58.3 23.3 20.8
From figure 4.9 It can be observed that for acid green vs Rhizopus
stolonifer dye concentration, temperature and volume of water were the
most influential factors. For the Acid green vs Trichoderma viridae
40
combination the experiment was influenced by agitation speed,dye
concentration and temperature. Inoculum size,agitation speed and pH
had the maximal effects on Basic violet vs Rhizopus stolonifer and
finally Basic violet vs Trichoderma viridae combination was influenced
by incubation time ,pH and dye concentration respectively.
41
Table 4.4:
4. Plackett Burman experimental Design
Variables Percentage dye removal
Trial AG VS AG VS BV VS BV VS
A B C D E F G
FM AT FM AT
1 H H L H L L H 47.6 69.42 72.5 0
2 H H H L H L L 47.6 27.33 0 0
3 L H H H L H L 40.5 4.58 0 0
4 L L H H H L H 87 49.44 0 0
5 H L L H H H L 75.2 40.27 0 0
6 L H L L H H H 84.4 0 0 0
7 H L H L L H H 80 52.08 0 9.44
8 L L L L L L L 60.1 78.23 0 18.74
50
AG VS RS
45
AG VS TV
EFFECT OF VARIABLES
40
AG VS PC
35
AG VS FO
30
AG VS FM
25
AG VS AT
20
BV VS PC
15
BV VS FO
10 BV VS RS
5 BV VS TV
0 BV VS FM
A B C D E F G
BV VS AT
PROCESS VARIABLES
42
Penicillium citrinum vs Acid green, Rhizopus stolonifer vs Acid green
and Fusarium moniliforme vs Acid green.
Table 4.5: Process variables and level used for Box Behnken Design
Levels
Variable Symbol Unit
-1 0 1
Time T d 2 3 4
43
Table 4.6:Box Behnken experimental design
ANOVA for the response surface model is given in table 4.6. The
coefficients of this model is given in equation 1 were also evaluated. A
p value showed that all of the linear coefficients were more significant
than their quadratic and cross product terms. However to minimize the
error, all of the coefficients were considered in the design. According to
ANOVA analysis, we noted a few lack of fits. This indicates that the
model does indeed represent the actual relationships of reaction
parameters, which are well within the selected ranges (Table 4.7).
44
Table 4.7: Model coefficients estimated by multiple linear regression
and analysis of variance
45
Table 4.8: Regression coefficients and significance of response
surface quadratic model
The final estimative response model equation (based on the actual value)
DR=7.62+4.94*A-7.970*B-14.84*C+5.46*A*B+4.33*A*C-2.03*B*C
+10.52*A2+56.47*B2+11.69*C2
where DR is the dye removal, A,B,C are the values of dye concentration
(mg/mL), time(d) and inoculum size (% w/v) respectively. The model
coefficients and probability values are shown in Table 4.8. The model
proved suitable for adequate representation of the real relationship
among the selected factors.
46
Fig 4.10:Response Surface and contour plot of for time vs. dye
concentration for at constant inoculum size on % dye removal
47
Fig 4.11:Response Surface and contour plot for dye concentration
vs. inoculum size at constant time on % dye removal
Fig 4.12: Response Surface and contour plot for time vs. inoculum
size for at constant dye concentration on % dye removal
48
to 15% dye removal gets lowered and then gets increased rapidly.
Similarly an increase in time from 2 to 4 days has the same effect on dye
removal. Comparatively inoculums size is more significant than time at
constant dye concentration.
From these figures, the optimal conditions for dye degradation
were found. The optimal values were obtained by solving the regression
equation using design expert 7 trial software.
Temperature T °C 27 32 37
49
Table 4.10: Box Behnken experimental design
1 0.12 27 10 75.94
2 0.2 27 10 83.33
3 0.12 37 10 86
4 0.2 37 10 74
5 0.12 32 5 44
6 0.2 32 5 50
7 0.12 32 15 32
8 0.2 32 15 25
9 0.16 27 5 75
10 0.16 37 5 89
11 0.16 27 15 70
12 0.16 37 15 49.75
13 0.16 32 10 5.9
14 0.16 32 10 42
15 0.16 32 10 16
50
Table 4.11: Model coefficients estimated by multiple linear
regression and analysis of variance
Sum of Mean F p-value
Source Df
Squares Square Value Prob > F
Model 9336.073 9 1037.341 7.325 0.02
A-[Dye] 3.934 1 3.934 0.027 0.874
B-Temperature 3.808 1 3.808 0.026 0.876
C-Inoculum 825.195 1 825.195 5.827 0.06
AB 93.993 1 93.993 0.663 0.452
AC 42.25 1 42.25 0.298 0.608
BC 293.265 1 293.265 2.07 0.209
A^2 592.254 1 592.254 4.182 0.096
B^2 7762.898 1 7762.898 54.82 0.0007
C^2 52.896 1 52.896 0.373 0.567
Residual 708.029 5 141.605
Lack of Fit 14.289 3 4.763 0.013 0.997
Pure Error 693.74 2 346.87
Cor Total 10044.103 14
51
The final estimative response model equation (based on the actual value)
53
Fig 4.15: Response Surface and contour plot for temperature vs.
inoculum size for at constant dye concentration on % dye removal
54
and 3 quadratic coefficients (A2, B2, C2) and 3 cross product
coefficients(AB, BC,AC) were significant.(table 4.)
Table 4.13: Process variables and level used for Box Behnken
Design
Levels
Variable Symbol Unit
-1 0 1
pH 4 6.5 9
55
evaluated. A p value showed that all of the linear coefficients were more
significant than their quadratic and cross product terms. However to
minimize the error, all of the coefficients were considered in the design.
According to ANOVA analysis, we noted a few lack of fits. This
indicates that the model does indeed represent the actual relationships of
reaction parameters, which are well within the selected ranges (Table
4.15).
p-value
Sum of Mean Prob >
Source Squares df Square F Value F
Model 4430.11 9 492.23 16.289 0.003
A-DYE
CONCENTRATION 2.553 1 2.553 0.084 0.782
B-AGITATION SPEED 1.990 1 1.990 0.065 0.807
C-pH 10.788 1 10.788 0.356 0.576
AB 0.562 1 0.562 0.018 0.896
AC 10.69 1 10.692 0.353 0.577
BC 4.558 1 4.558 0.150 0.713
A^2 14.640 1 14.640 0.484 0.517
B^2 4307.628 1 4307.628 142.54 < 0.0001
C^2 0.909 1 0.909 0.030 0.869
Residual 151.093 5 30.218
Lack of Fit 146.863 3 48.954 23.14 0.041
Pure Error 4.230 2 2.11
Cor Total 4581.21 14
56
Table 4.16: Regression coefficients and significance of response
surface quadratic model
Coefficient Standard 95% CI 95% CI
Factor df VIF
Estimate Error Low High
Intercept 26.85 1 3.173 18.69 35.008
A-Dye
0.565 1 1.943 -4.431 5.561 1
Concentration
B-Agitation
0.498 1 1.943 -4.497 5.494 1
Speed
C-pH 1.161 1 1.943 -3.834 6.157 1
AB -0.375 1 2.748 -7.440 6.690 1
AC -1.635 1 2.748 -8.700 5.430 1
BC 1.0675 1 2.748 -5.997 8.132 1
A^2 -1.991 1 2.860 -9.345 5.362 1.01
B^2 34.156 1 2.860 26.80 41.510 1.01
C^2 0.496 1 2.860 -6.85 7.850 1.01
The final estimative response model equation (based on the actual value)
DR=26.85+0.565*A+0.498*B1.161*C-0.375*A*B-
1.635*A*C+1.0675*B*C-1.991*A2+34.156*B2+0.4962*C2
57
Fig 4.16: Response Surface and contour plot of for agitation speed
vs. dye concentration for at constant pH on % dye removal
58
Fig 4.17:Response Surface and contour plot for dye concentration
vs. pH at constant agitation speed on % dye removal
Fig 4.18: Response Surface and contour plot for pH vs. agitation
speed for at constant dye concentration on % dye removal.
59
dye removal has been observed .But increase in agitation speed from 0
to 100 rpm the dye removal decreases and then increases rapidly.
Comparatively agitation speed is more significant than pH at constant
dye concentration.
From these figures, the optimal conditions for dye degradation
were found. The optimal values were obtained by solving the regression
equation using design expert 7 trial software.
60
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSION
Eleven fungal species were screened for their ability to degrade the
selected synthetic dye solutions. Out of 10 potential fungi degrading dyes,
6 species were selected for further parameter screening by Plackett-Burman
design (PBD). The growth curve studies were carried out to determine the
mid log phase of each species. The variables influencing the dye
degradation by fungi were identified and screened by PBD. From the PBD
results, three significant variables such as volume of water, time and
inoculum size that have the maximal influence on the degradation process
were identified and further optimized by Box-Behnken design (BBD). The
experimental results were run through the trial version of design expert
software). In this study, P.citrinum showed maximum acid green removal
of 96.78% at initial dye concentration of 0.2 mg/mL, contact time of 2 days
and inoculum size of 5.38% (w/v). Similarly R.stolonifer showed 90.78%
acid green removal at initial dye concentration of 0.14 mg/mL, temperature
of 36.98°C and inoculum size of 5.47% (w/v). F.moniliforme revealed
60.38% of removal with optimal conditions of dye concentration 0.20
mg/mL , pH of 4.00 and agitation speed 0 rpm. The experimental and
statistical results showed that the optimum conditions could be an ideal
solution for acid green degradation by Penicillium citrinum, Rhizopus
stolonifer and Fusarium moniliforme.
61
APPENDICES
Appendix 1
A1.1Growth Medium
Components Quantity
Potatoes ( Scrubbed And Diced) 200 g
Sucrose 20 g
Agar 20 g
Distilled Water 1000 ml
Components Quantity
Potatoes ( Scrubbed And Diced) 200 g
Dextrose 20 g
Agar 20 g
Distilled Water 1000 ml
Components Quantity
Malt extract 20 g
Agar 20 g
Water 1000 ml
62
Table A1.4:Composition of Czapek Yeast extract Agar –CYA
Composition Quantity
Czapek concentrate 10 ml
Di potassium hydrogen phosphate 1g
Yeast Extract 5g
Sucrose 30 g
Agar 15 g
Distilled Water 1000 ml
Composition Quantity
Sodium Nitrate (NaNO3) 30g
Potassium chloride (KCl) 5g
Magnesium Sulphate (MgSO4.7H2O) 5g
Ferrous Sulphate (FeSO4.7H2O) 0.1g
Distilled water 100ml
Composition Quantity
Yeast extract 3g
Peptone 10.0 g
Dextrose 20.0 g
Distilled water 1000 mL
63
REFERENCE
5. Balan DSL and Monteiro RTR. (2001) ‘Decolorization of textile indigo dye by
ligninolytic fungi’, Journal of Biotechnology, Vol.89,pp.141-145.
6. Bumpus JA and Brock BJ.(1988) ‘Biodegradation of crystal violet by the white rot
fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium’, Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Vol. 54,No.5,pp.1143-1150.
64
9. Christian V, Shrivastava R, Shukla D, Modi H and Vyas BRM. (2005) ‘Mediator role
of veratryl alcohol in the lignin peroxidase-catalyzed oxidative decolorization of
Remazol brilliant blue R’, Enzyme and Microbial Technology,Vol.36,pp.426-431.
10.Cripps C, Bumpus JA and Aust SD. (1990) ‘Biodegradation of azo and heterocyclic
dyes by Phanerochaete chrysosporium’, Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Vol. 56,No.4,pp.1114-1118.
11.Eliana Pereira Chagas and Lucia Regina Durrant. (2001) ‘Decolorization of azo dyes
by Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Pleurotus sajorcaju’, Enzyme and Microbial
Technology, Vol. 29, pp.473-477.
15.Ilgi Karapinar Kapdan and Fikret Kargi. (2002) ‘Simultaneous biodegradation and
adsorption of textile dyestuff in an activated sludge unit’, Process
Biochemistry,Vol.37, pp. 973–981.
17.Kim TH, Lee Y, Yang J, Park C, Lee B and Kim S. (2004) ‘Decolorization of dye
solutions by a membrane bioreactor(MBR) using white-rot fungi’, Desalination
Vol.168,pp.287-293.
19.Martins MAM, Ferreira IC, Santos IM, Queiroz MJ and Lima N.(2001)
‘Biodegradation of bioaccessible textile azo dyes by Phanerochaete chrysosporium’,
Journal of Biotechnology, Vol.89, pp.91-98.
65
20.Máximo C, Pessoa Amorim MT and Costa-Ferreira M. (2003) ‘Biotransformation of
industrial reactive azo dyes by Geotrichum sp CCMI 1019’, Enzyme and Microbial
Technology ,Vol.32,pp.145-151.
21.Ozfer Yesilada , Dilek Asma and Seval Cing. (2003) ‘Decolorization of textile dyes
by fungal pellets’, Process Biochemistry,Vol. 38,pp.933-938.
66
30.Robinson T, Chandran B and Nigam P. (2001) ‘Studies on the production of enzymes
by white-rot fungi for the decolourisation of textile dyes’, Enzyme and Microbial
Technology Vol.29,pp.575-579.
32.Sanghi R, Dixit A and Guha S. (2006) ‘Sequential batch culture studies for the
decolorisation of reactive dye by Coriolus versicolor’, Bioresource
Technology,Vol.97, pp.396-400.
33.Selvam K, Swaminathan K and Chae KS. (2003) ‘Decolourization of azo dyes and a
dye industry effluent by a white rot fungus Thelephora sp’, Bioresource
Technology,Vol.88, pp.115-119.
35.Sumathi S and Manju BS. (2000) ‘Uptake of reactive textile dyes by Aspergillus
foetidus’, Enzyme and Microbial Technology Vol27,pp.347-355.
36.Tekere M, Mswaka AY, Zvauya R and Read JS.(2001) ‘Growth, dye degradation and
ligninolytic activity studies on Zimbabwean white rot fungi’, Enzyme and Microbial
Technology Vol.28,pp.420-426.
37.Toh YC, Yen JJL, Obbard JP and Ting YP. (2003) ‘Decolourisation of azo dyes by
white-rot fungi (WRF) isolated in Singapore’, Enzyme and Microbial Technology,
Vol.33,pp.569-575.
67