Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
19, 2016
only the Siwaliks and the Terai in Nepal but the entire Moreover, this is not a recent phenomenon as history
Ganges basin. of Chure’s systematic deforestation can be traced back
to 1960s when government distributed a significant
Despite, repeated attempts by the government to rein size of forest land to accommodate the people of Nepali
in such assaults on nature, such as declaring the region origin returning from Myanmar in 1960s and to solve
protected area and promotion of community forestry, the problem of landlessness.3 Deforestation accelerated
the forest encroachment and haphazard extraction has when the Land Tax Act 1977 was enacted. As the Act
yet to be checked. defined forested land as government property, people
cut down trees in their private land to protect their
Kamala River Basin ownership (FRA/DFRS: 2014). Moreover, eradication
of malaria and resultant population growth in addition
Against this context, a perception survey was conducted to the construction of the East-West Highway are also
in the Kamala River basin to examine the effects of the attributed for causing deforestation in the region.
Chure degradation on river water flow and groundwater
availability. The Kamala River Basin, which has become Mining in Chure
one of the major sources of construction material
in Nepal, have long been subjected to haphazard Kamala River is one of the major sources of sand, stone
deforestation and unchecked extraction of sand and and gravels in the central Terai, which is then trucked
stone. Kamala River, which originates near Maithan in off to various cities in Nepal and in the adjoining
Sindhuli district, flows through Udaypur, Dhanusha and states in India. According to President Chure Terai
Siraha districts before entering India near Madhubani Madhesh Conservation and Development Committee
district in Bihar. The study conducted in the upper (PCTMCDC), the area annually supplies about 6.5
(Sindhuli District) and lower (Dhanusha district) parts million cubic metres of sand, gravels and stone (SGS)
of Kamala River Basin found that the locals perceive legally and the amount extracted without permits could
that the debilitating activities which are undermining
the Chure have affected their livelihood especially with
regard to access to water.
Box 2 Kamala river
Felling trees
Kamala River originates near Maithan, Sindhuli District,
in the lower parts of the Mahabharat range, at an
Deforestation in the Kamala Basin area has been elevation of 1,200 metres. Kamalamai Municipality
prominent as all the sampled districts have a forest and VDCs such as Ranibas, Harshai, Nipane fall along
cover percentage that is less than the national the way as the river passes through the Chure area
percentage.2 Compared with 1995, forest cover in those of the district. The main tributaries of the river in Nepal
districts has declined in 2010 as illustrated in table 1. are Tawa, Thakuar, Kali, Chadaha, Gwang and
others. The combined flow debouches in the Terai,
This has been attributed to a long political transition
at Chisapani, where the river borders Siraha and
and the absence of elected representatives at local Dhanusha Districts. The river has a higher gradient
bodies. At the same time, hardly any oversight over when it flows through the Mahabharat range in the
illegal activities is in place, especially pertaining to north and becomes flatter as it runs south.
public property and exploitation of natural resources.
2
BRIEFING PAPER
No. 19, 2016
15
Impacts on Description
Impacts on related ecosystems
Biodiversity
12 (for example; fisheries)
Land losses Both inland and coastal through erosion
Hydrological Change in water flows, flood regulation and
(Rs in million)
9
functions marine currents
Through lowering of the water table and
Water supply
6 pollution
Damage to bridges, river embankments and
Infrastructures
coastal infrastructures
3 Climate Directly through transport emissions
Coastal erosion, changes in deltaic
Landscape
0 structures, quarries, pollution of rivers
2000/01 2005/06 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 Decline of protection against extreme
Extreme events
events (flood, drought, storm surge)
Sindhuli Dhanusha
be double that amount.4 For District Development is available to scientifically assess the dangers posed
Committees (DDC) of Sindhuli, Dhanusha and Siraha, by these activities. Likewise, subsequent government
such material extraction is an important source of decisions such as bestowing discretionary authority
revenue. As Local Self Governance Act 1999 has to Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development
bestowed the rights to sell such material on the DDC, regarding the use of excavators for extraction has
checking excessive extraction from the rivers is not in further provided impetus to haphazard extraction.
the interest of the DDC.
Degradation
However, official revenue data does not explain the
extent of actual extraction that is going on. One These assaults on environment in the forms of deforestation
estimate suggests that the actual value of extraction is and extraction has led to large scale degradation whose
twice the amount that official extraction revenue figures impact could be traced to water availability – from
suggest.5 Indeed, huge amounts of illegal extraction are rainwater to groundwater and river flow.
not even reported. In addition, a significant amount of
quarrying is done by the local people to construct their The effects of these activities are observed in the
own houses, a booming activity even in the rural areas. precipitation rates and ground water availability in
the adjoining areas, not to mention the water flow
Unfortunately, the local bodies that grant the in Kamala. The Precipitation data of two stations —
permission for extraction do not conduct necessary Sindhuligadhi and Chishapani - shows only slight
environmental impact studies, so limited information increase over a period in the average rainfall. But, the
Figure 4 Effects of deforestation and extraction Figure 5 Static water level data at Godar, Dhanusha
10
8
- Water discharge in river
- Width and surface level 6
(in meters)
- Deforestation
of water course
- Extraction of 4
- Precipitation rate
sand, gravels,
- Groundwater
stones 2
availability
- Water quality 0
Year 1995 1998 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
– June 8.80 9.18 7.72 0.37 8.35 6.75 6.43 7.46 6.95 4.50 4.75 5.65 5.85 5.65 6.74 7.52
– Sept 6.70 4.46 5.71 5.35 6.01 0.68 0.5 1.05 4.45 5.66 5.81 5.66 6.41 6.93
– Ave. 7.4 6.4 6.3 5.3 6.0 6.4 4.8 5.9 4.0 0.5 2.4 3.5 5.6 5.8 5.6 6.5 6.7 7.2
3
BRIEFING PAPER
No. 19, 2016
available data shows significant changes in the ground vulnerable. Most of the respondents in the lower basin
water level. The depth at which ground water was said that the region as a whole was at risk because of the
accessible has increased after 2007 when the region degradation of forest, land and sand.
experienced devastating flood (illustrated in figure 5).
The water that was accessible some 2.4 metres from Depleted water sources
the surface in 2008 had gone down to the depth of 7.2
metres by 2015. Climate change along with the ongoing A perception survey conducted in the Kamala River
quarrying and deforestation are perceived as responsible catchment area in Sindhuli and Dhanusha district found
for changes in ground water depth. that the locals attribute the ever increasing deforestation
and extraction of construction materials from Kamala
There is a lack of adequate and valid time series data for affecting the water cycle of the basin. They said
related to the Kamala River to carry out quantitative that haphazard quarrying of sand and stones from the
study. Thus, only perception study was conducted lower belt has changed the water course such that both
to observe the relationship between the basin’s the width and depth of the water channel have fallen,
degradation and its impact on Kamala’s water. indicating reduced regular flow. Likewise, they also
perceived that the water sources, such as underground
Conservation efforts at upper basin boring and natural wells, are not providing sufficient
water to meet household needs at present in comparison
The perceptions of the households from upper and to the situation 10 or 20 years ago.
lower basins vary regarding the effect of degradation
and depletion of the resources. The community in the Likewise, about 45 per cent of the respondents from
upper reaches appear to have become aware of the Dhanusha and over 37 per cent from Sindhuli perceive
dangers of degradation and have increased participation that the river’s water course has been shifting from
in resource conservation. They have declared vulnerable time to time. As the physiography is already fragile,
areas as a No Grazing Zone and have begun conserving even minor floods bring huge amounts of debris and
the forest by forming community forest groups. Their deposit it along the lower parts of the river. Such
initiatives have even led to restoration and recovery of deposits usually alter the regular path of the river. The
the river flow, water discharge capacity, forest cover excavation of the river bed for construction material
and farmlands that had been wasted away. Thanks to without any technical study has created many nick
these efforts, water availability within Nepal is not points along the river ultimately causing the change in
much affected but such initiatives are lacking in the the river course.
lower parts of the basin.
Erratic Kamala
However, lack of forest management and the
extraction of sand and stones in the absence of effective Against this context, the findings from key informant
monitoring have left the areas in the lower basin interviews (KII) indicate that the surface of the river has
5
4
BRIEFING PAPER
No. 19, 2016
Figure 6 Water availability from natural wells Figure 7 Ground water availability
50 20 years back 10 years back Now 20 years back 10 years back Now
50
40
40
(% of respondents)
(% of respondents)
30
30
20 20
10 10
0 0
Over Highly Sufficient Insufficient Hard to get Can’t say Over Highly Sufficient Insufficient Hard to get Can’t say
abundance sufficient abundance sufficient
moved up compared to previous decades. Floods bring Likewise, in terms of ground water availability, about
heavy amounts of aggregates because of extraction 42.5 per cent believed that it was overabundant and
of sand and deforestation has already weakened the 46.3 per cent believed it was highly sufficient 10 years
physiography of the study area. Additionally, for a few ago, but, in the present, 33.8 per cent felt that it was
years, a couple of villages of Sindhuli banned digging hard to get.
in the river. Therefore, in the upper parts of Sindhuli,
the deposits are untouched and the surface level of the These figures indicate that it has become difficult today
river has risen. Therefore, a majority of the people in than it was in the past to extract ground water from
Dhanusha and some from the lower parts of Sindhuli Kamala’s the catchment areas.6
perceive that the riverbed in the lower reaches has
gone down despite the increased deposition of debris The quality of river has also been affected in the recent
compared to previous decades. times as clay and silt content has increased in the
water and these get deposited on the farmland through
According to the locals, the flow of debris, including irrigation. During the household survey, about 59
sand and pebbles, from north to south, along the per cent of the respondents were found arguing that
Kamala has been increasing. At the same time, the Kamala’s water was fine for irrigation at the moment.
lower parts of the river are witnessing a decrease in the
riverbed level due to excessive excavation. Moreover, In terms of adequacy of the Kamala River water for
frequently occurring floods caused by deforestation drinking purposes, over 46.3 per cent said that it is not
and quarrying have reduced the land’s water storage fine for drinking at the moment. The KIIs unearthed
capacity. As a result, the banks are eroding and the two basic reasons for the quality deterioration: increased
flow channels change course frequently. The locals say content of silt and mud and urbanisation-induced
that the river’s regular water flow has declined and the pollutants. About 53.8 per cent of the respondents
entire water cycle in the catchment area is affected by thought that Kamala water was more than adequate for
the degradation. drinking purpose 20 years ago. Only about 32.5 per cent
think that current Kamala river water is adequate for
Drinking water troubles drinking.7
6
5
BRIEFING PAPER
No. 19, 2016
© SAWTEE, 2016
P.O. Box: 19366, Tukucha Marg, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal, Tel: +977-1-4424360/4444438
Fax: +977-1-4444570, E-mail: sawtee@sawtee.org, Web: www.sawtee.org, Design: Krishna Subedi, Printed at Variety Printers, Kathmandu
8
5