Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Submitted to
DR.G.Muruganantham
MBA, M.Phil, UGC-NET, Ph.D
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR - DOMS - NITT
INDEX
1. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………….3
1
2.
INTRODUCTION
After independence, Indian economic policy was a result of the nostalgia for socialism from
the pre-independence era which had driven and inspired our leader. The days of license Raj,
2
orthodox business practices, non-involvement of foreign business and barriers on imports and
exports ensured that for decades our economic growth was pathetically slow. The slow
economic growth cost India its social development also. The scenario of health, education
and social reforms remained dismal in most parts of the country, a direct implication and
indicator of the fact that social growth is not sustainable without economic development.
By the early 1980s, deregulations and economic reforms were being slowly introduced to
liberalize trade, industrial and financial policies. The turning point came in the form of the
grim economic and financial situation of the 1990‘s when the foreign reserves had almost
depleted and our economy was on the verge of bankruptcy. In July 1991, India launched a
major economic reforms program, opening up the economy to trade, foreign investment and
more private sector participation. Since then, in spite of the regime changes, liberalization has
been going on in a phased manner. India has emerged as one of the major player in World
Economic arena and is attracting sizeable amounts of foreign capital in the country. Finding
more economic space, many private sector, companies and MNCs have taken up/set up their
Projects at places having locational advantage. Many capital intensive projects in heavy
engineering, steel, power generation, fertilizer, infrastructure development, etc. have also
been taken up. These Projects certainly have enhanced the capital resource of the nation and
accrued economic gain to certain section of population. Besides these infrastructural
developments, the recent emergence of India in the service sector, particularly in the software
and IT industry has lead to a spur in the economic growth in the last few years. Driven by the
domestic market and the new found spending power of the Indian consumer the
economy is on the fast track. But growing only in the service sector cannot help in
realizing the goal of a developed nation. Strong growth in industry, infrastructure and
manufacturing sector is the next main requirement along with a growth in exports to
bring in the much needed foreign currency. This is where the idea of SEZ comes in.
3
as well as attractive fiscal packages from both the Centre and the respective States where they
are situated.
While the first SEZ is said to have been set up in the year 1940 or so in Ireland, more than
130 countries now have SEZs / Free Trade Zones or similar Bodies. The largest and biggest
in total land area and volume of production, business and employment are in China. These
numbers are in fact sky-high compared to SEZs elsewhere. It is China which in 1980 created
the present concept of SEZ and the subsequent large number of SEZs coming up in other
countries is the result of lessons learnt from the Chinese great economic success through
SEZs. The gigantic economic growth of China is said to be through these SEZs and thus they
are the best models.
U.A.E. has more than 8 SEZs - some of them big in size and highly successful.
SEZ IN INDIA
SEZs in India came only recently i.e. in November 2000. The category 'SEZ' covers a
broad range of more specific zone types, including Free Trade Zones (FTZ), Export
Processing Zones (EPZ), Free Zones (FZ), Industrial Estates (IE), Free Ports, Urban
Enterprise Zones and others. The Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, was passed by
Parliament in May, 2005 which received Presidential assent on the 23rd of June, 2005 .
Initially the Foreign Trade Policy Guidelines regulated the SEZs in India which was
abandoned in February 2006. Though the Government of India announced the SEZ scheme in
April 2000, the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 was brought into effect along with the
Special Economic Zones Rules, 2006 from February 10th, 2006. The Act and the Rules
together replaced the previous applicable legislations and rules governing the operations of
SEZ and provided for a single legislation. The structure of a SEZ is also defined in the EXIM
Policy. Special Economic Zones (SEZs) have been now in India for over four years. SEZs
4
came into being from 1st November 2000 when four operating Export Processing Zones
(EPZs) were converted into SEZs vide Notification by the Govt. of India. At present, while 9
SEZs are operating, the total number of SEZs granted approval is 35.
OBJECTIVES OF SEZ
5
(a) Generation of additional economic activity
(b) Promotion of exports of goods and services
(c) Promotion of investment from domestic and foreign sources
(d) Creation of employment opportunities
(e) Development of infrastructure facilities
(f) Boosting exports and attracting investments in various export-oriented manufacturing and
service sectors.
The requirements concerning the minimum size of an SEZ are relaxed with regard to certain
small states. Thus, in the states of Assam, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh,
Mizoram, Manipur, Tripura, Himachal Pradesh, Uttaranchal, Sikkim, Jammu and Kashmir,
Goa or in a Union Territory, the minimum area requirement for multi-product SEZs or a
sector-specific SEZ has been reduced to 200 and 50 hectares or more respectively. In the case
of a multi-product or a sector-specific SEZ, at least 50 per cent of the area must be earmarked
for developing the processing area. If the developer proposing to set up an SEZ is not in
possession of the minimum contiguous area, the Central Government may approve more than
one developer. In such cases, each developer shall be considered as a developer in respect of
6
the land under its possession. Whereas, at first, there was no ceiling regarding the maximum
size of an SEZ, a meeting of the so called Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) held on
5th April 2007 brought about a capping at 5,000 hectares, which can still be undercut by
states as land matters are state matters according to Indian constitutional law.
SEZ APPROVAL
To consider proposals pertaining to the Special Economic Zones (SEZs), the Board of
Approval (BOA) of the Special Economic Zones (SEZs) met recently. The Board also
approved other miscellaneous requests pertaining to SEZs. In this meeting, 53 applications
for setting up SEZs were considered and 36 Formal approvals and 9 In principle approvals
were granted.
Prominent among the Formal approvals are: Electronic Hardware SEZ by Foxconn India
Developers Private Limited in Tamil Nadu; Aviation Sector SEZ by GMR Hyderabad
International Airport Limited in Andhra Pradesh; One IT/ITES SEZ and one Gem and
Jewellery SEZ by Omnibus Industrial Development Corporation of Daman & Diu and Dadra
& Nagar Haveli; Three SEZs for Biotechnology, Light Engineering and Pharmaceuticals by
Navi Mumbai SEZ Private Limited in Maharashtra; IT/ITES SEZ by Reliance Infocom
Infrastructure Private Limited in Maharashtra and six IT/ITES SEZs by Electronic
Corporation of Tamil Nadu in various Districts of Tamil Nadu and MAS Fabrics Textile SEZ
in Andhra Pradesh which is being developed with 100% FDI. Prominent In principle
approvals granted are: Electronics and Electrical SEZ, Engineering Equipment &
Components SEZ and a Multi Product SEZ by TIDCO in Tamil Nadu; Multi product SEZ by
DLF Limited in Rajasthan; Aerospace related industries SEZ by KIADB in Karnataka.
7
Divvy's Laboratories, Andhra Pradesh
Rajiv Gandhi Technology Park, Chandigarh
ETL Infrastructure IT SEZ, Chennai
Hyderabad Gems Limited, Hyderabad
SEZ – BENEFITS
1. Tax incentives:
8
2. Infrastructure and Utilities:
3. Simplified procedures:
Exemption from industrial licensing requirements for items reserved for the SSI
sector.
No import license requirements.
No routine examinations by Customs for export and import cargo.
Exemption from duties on import /procurement of goods for the development,
operation and maintenance of SEZ.
9
These benefits foster a conducive business environment to attract local and foreign
investment, which would not otherwise have been forthcoming. The competitive advantages
of zones may also be explained within the framework of the cluster approach. Zones are
industrial clusters where external economies of scale and other advantages help the operating
firms in reducing costs, developing competitive production systems and attracting investment,
in particular, FDI. As a result of these benefits, many developing countries have been
promoting zones with the expectation that they will provide the engine of growth to propel
industrialization.
Setting up SEZs in such areas can have many positive effects on these situations as listed below:
10
facilities will be setup in these regions. Need to bring in the raw construction material will
ensure better roads right from the beginning.
5. CONTRACT OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOCAL POPULATION: Though it is obvious
that most of the construction work would be carried out by big real-estate contractors but the
local population may be provided with an opportunity for the supply of lower level materials
such as sand, stone etc.
6. FURTHER SELF EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUINITIES THROUGH TRAINING: If
the developmental authorities ensure that they work with the local population for mutual
benefits then they can be given training for self employment. The scope for training people
for various kinds of jobs depends on the kinds of job which are going to emerge from the
Project.
11
3. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: huge tracts of agricultural as well as forested land will
be converted for industrial purposes for the setting up of SEZs. This can have grave effect on
the ecosystem. Besides, this it is unfortunate that the minimum environmental guidelines set
by the United Nations for Special Economic Zones the world over, are not necessarily
followed in our country. The blatant replacement of such forested or agricultural land can
lead to severe environmental problems
SEZ CONTROVERSY
Land, especially agricultural land is a very sensitive issue in India. There are millions of
people whose livelihood depends on agricultural land. But the introduction of SEZ in India
has resulted in the dispossession of agricultural land and has affected the livelihood of farmer
at large. In against of this, farmers first protested to safeguard their interests through litigation
and court cases challenging the establishment of SEZs. But later on, the resistance against
SEZ in India became massive when political parties also joined the farmers.
Jamnagar Incident
In November 2006, farmers from the Jamnagar District in Gujarat moved the High Court of
Gujarat and later to the Supreme Court in order to challenge the setting-up of a 10,000-acre
(approx. 4,000-ha) SEZ by Reliance Infrastructure. They claimed that the acquisition of large
12
tracts of agricultural land in the villages of the district not only violated the Land Acquisition
Act of 1894, but was also in breach of the public interest. This led the Government to
“consider” putting a ceiling on the maximum land area that can be acquired for multi-product
zones and decide to “go slow” in approving SEZs.
Nandigram Violence
The Nandigram violence is another famous incidence related to SEZ controversy. Nandigram
is a rural area in Purba Medinipur district of the Indian state of West Bengal. It is located
about 70 km southwest of Kolkata, on the south bank of the Haldi River, opposite the
industrial city of Haldia. In 2007 the West Bengal government decided to allow Salim Group
to set up a chemical hub at Nandigram under the SEZ policy. Farmers of that village were
against it. So, on the order of the Left Front government on 14 March 2007, more than 3,000
heavily armed police stormed the Nandigram area. During this incidence, police shot dead at
least 14 villagers and wounded 70 more including children and women.
The above given examples show the controversies associated with SEZs. No doubts that these
commercial hubs started with a lot of premature praise and have now became a bone of
contention which is readily exploited by the political forces to the detriment of the peasants,
who fear losing their means of livelihood.
13
(iii) China continues to score because it has bundled an attractive tax environment with
world-class infrastructure and a liberal labour environment. In India, on the other hand,
buckling under the pressure from Left parties, the government has axed the Section 50(b)
from the central SEZ bill, which would have empowered states to ease labour laws in SEZs.
Democratic India has strong labour unions organically linked to political parties.
Authoritarian China, conversely, has very pliant unions. Here India has lost a crucial edge in
the global environment marketplace.
(iv) India has also some advantages over countries like China. It has significantly larger
English-speaking workforce than does China. India also has an edge in a number of key
knowledge based industries like software, IT-enabled services, medical services, drugs &
pharmaceuticals & agro-based industries. Hence India‘s SEZs are therefore likely to develop
along quite different lines from China‘s. Indian zones will more likely attract investments in
high-end human skill based industries & services sector.
(v) Also in the light of the increasing economic engagement of India with the ASEAN &
China, it is more likely that a greater proportion of investment into Indian zones could come
from these countries than from US or Europe.
CONCLUSION
On the basis of economic theory and history we can conclude that absorption of agricultural
labour is necessary for sustained economic development of a developing country. “Special
Economic Zones” constitute a medium for such sustenance. However, the SEZ policy in India
has suffered from permission being granted for far too many subs optimally sized SEZs or for
others to serve as appendages to mega cities already suffering from overcrowding,
infrastructure and a size which far exceeds the optimum. There are other ways of minimizing
peasant unrest during the process of land acquisition for SEZ development. For example, the
state can assume the role of a passive provider of a legal framework, information and
incentive packages. Mutually beneficial transactions will automatically result if possibilities
for any exist. If implemented according to proper rules and regulations and most importantly,
with proper consideration for farmers and project affected people (PAPs), the SEZ s provides
a win-win situation for the company and the PAPs as well. In the ideal condition, the Project
Affected People benefit by getting better occupation, better living conditions and better
income while the involved developers and company get the benefits of tax-exempt production
centers along with a dedicated workforce derived from amongst the PAPs.
14
REFERENCES
2. www.scribd.com - 6910855-Special-Economic-Zones-Socio-Economic-Impact-
report has been prepared as a part of the practice component of course HS-6101 titled
3. “Special Economic Zones in India” - Research and business analytics group ,India,
www.esnips.com
6. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Economic_Zone
7. www.macroscan.com
11. “South India’s largest SEZ to attract 17.5 k cr funds” – The Financial Express,
15