A: ROADS

FINDINGS: RECOMMENDATIONS:

A. Concrete Pavement
A.1 Sub-base

1. Sub-base materials were not incorporated
into the project.
1. Deduct the amount equivalent to the volume
of sub-base course materials not incorporated
into the project from the payment of
Contractor.
Note:
If sub-base is considered unnecessary due to
stronger subgrade then the recommendation
is acceptable. If not, then it is required to
introduce sub-base as per design.

2. Insufficient aggregate sub-base course 2. Deduct the equivalent amount of sub-base

materials were provided into the project. materials not incorporated into the project
from the payment of Contractor.

3. Inferior quality of sub-base materials were 3. Remove and replace the inferior quality of
used in the project. sub-base materials used in the project.

4. No/inadequate compaction of sub-base 4. Compact the base materials to the required

materials was observed. density.

5. Oversized aggregates for Item 200 5. Reprocess the materials by screening to

were noted. conform with the grading requirements.

A.2

1. Base materials were not incorporated into
the project.
1. Deduct the amount equivalent to the volume of
base course materials not incorporated into the
project from the payment of Contractor.
Note:
If base is considered unnecessary due to
stronger subgrade then the recommendation
is acceptable. If not, then it is required to
introduce base as per introduce base as per
design.

2. Insufficient aggregate base course 2. Deduct the equivalent amount of base materials
materials were provided into the project. not incorporated into the project from the
payment of Contractor.

3. Inferior quality of base materials were 3. Remove and replace the inferior quality of base
used in the project. materials used in the project.

4. No/inadequate compaction of base 4. Compact the base materials to the required

materials was observed. density.
5. Oversized aggregates for Item 201 were
noted.
6. Other materials other than the required
materials for Item 201 were used in the
project.
7. Erosion and scouring of base course
materials were observed.
8. Incomplete tests were made on Item 201,
Aggregate Base Course.
A.3 PCCP
1. Major scaling on completed concrete
pavement was observed.
2. Minor scaling on completed concrete
pavement was observed.
3. Transverse cracks on completed concrete
pavement was observed.
w/in L/3 = R & R
greater than L/3 = concrete epoxy
4. Transverse cracks with settlement on
completed concrete pavement was noted.
5. Longitudinal cracks on completed
concrete pavement was noted.
6. Criss-cross/diagonal cracks on concrete
pavement was noted.
7. Temperature, corner and restraint cracks
on concrete pavement were noted.
5. Reprocess the materials by screening to
conform with the grading requirements.
6. Deduct the amount equivalent to the price
difference between the actual incorporated
into the project.
7. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to institute immediate corrective measures to
prevent further damage.
6. Require the Materials Engr. to implement
strictly the minimum testing requirement for
construction materials.
1. Require the contractor, at his own expense, to
redo/remove and replace the pavement blocks
with major scaling.
2. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
apply epoxy mortar on all pavement blocks with
minor scaling. Require the implementing Office to
monitor the defective areas, likewise, at the
Contractor's own expense.
3. Require the Contractor (within L/3 = removal
and greater than L/3 = concrete epoxy), at his
own expense , to seal with concrete epoxy the
pavement blocks with transverse cracks with
settlement.
4. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
redo/remove and replace the pavement blocks
with transverse cracks with settlement.
5. Require the Contractor at his own expense, to
seal with concrete epoxy the pavement blocks
with longitudinal cracks.
6. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
redo/remove and replace the pavement blocks
with criss-cross/diagonal cracks.
7. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to seal with concrete epoxy the pavement
blocks with temperature, corner and restraint
cracks. (monitor - warranty period)
8. Honeycombs were noted on the exposed
side section of the concrete pavement.
9. The completed concrete pavement is
deficient in width and in length.
10. Asphalt sealant was not provided on
weakened plane and longitudinal joints
of the completed pavement.
11. Improper brooming was noted on the
completed concrete pavement.(1.5 mm)
12. Concrete vibrator was not used during
pouring of concrete.
13. Partial billing was made even w/o the
required test reports on beam samples.
14. No/improper curing was done on newly
poured concrete.
15. Substandard dowel bars were used on
concrete pavement.
16. No cylinder samples were taken during
concreting operation.
17. Improper construction of weakened
plane joints of concrete pavement was
noted.
18. Concrete mix was observed to
contain too much water.
19. Peeling - off of asphalt sealant on
weakened plane joints was noted.
20. Inadequate number of dowel bars was
used.
21. Asphalt (Item 310) and PCCP were
noted at intermittent sections of
concrete pavement.
8. Require the Contractor at his own expense to
plaster the noted honeycombs with cement
paste.
9. Deduct the amount equivalent to the noted
deficiencies in dimensions from the payment
of the Contractor or require him to reconstruct
same to require dimensions as specified in the
plan, if it is necessary.
10. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to provide weakened plane and
longitudinal joints with asphalt sealant.
11. Require the Project Engineer to observe
proper finishing of concrete in suceeding projects.
12. Require the Contractor to provide concrete
vibrator during concrete pouring.
13.require the Project/Materials Engineers to
explain in writing why partial payment was
allowed in the project even without the required
test.
14. Require the Contractor to observe proper
method of curing of concrete pavement.
15. Require the Project Engineer to explain
in writing why substantial dowel bars were used
in the project.
16. Require the Project Engineer to adhere to
proper materials and construction quality control.
17. Require the Project Engineer to observe
proper construction of weakened plane joints.
18. Require the project Engineer to strictly
adhere to the proper materials and construction
quality control.
19. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to provide sufficient asphalt sealant on
weakened plane joints.
20.Require the Project Engineer to observe
correct dowel requirements.
21. Require the Cotractor, at his own expense
to patch potholes with epoxy mortar.
22. Crown was not provided on the
completed pavement.
23. Concrete beam samples failed to meet
the minimum flexural strength
requirements.
24. Per coring test conducted, an area
of ___ sq.m. of Item 311 ( PDCP) from
Sta.____ to Sta._____failed to meet the
tolerance in pavement thickness
requirements.
25. Use of ordinary paint instead of
thermoplastic paint for centerline
markings was observed.
26. Concrete cylinder samples taken failed
to meet the compressive strength
requirements.
27. Improper placing of tie bars on the
logitudinal joints was observed.
28. Chipping of edges, were noted at the
exposed sides of the concrete pavement
due to unconstructed shoulders.
A.4 Shoulder
1. Insufficient and uncompacted
shouldering materials were noted.
2. Use of oversized aggregates for
shouldering was noted.
3. Shoulders were noted to be deficient in
width.
4. Substandard quality of shouldering
materials was noted.
5. Shoulders were not constructed
22. Require the Project Engineer to explain
in writing why no crown was provided on
the completed pavement.
23.Conduct core boring test to check the
actual strength of the concrete in - place.
24. Deduct from payment due corresponding
the area equivalent to ___m² of Item 311
(PCCP), which is found deficient in thickness.
25. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to repaint the centerline with specified reflec -
torized thermoplastic paints.
26. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to redo the sections that failed to meet the
compressive strength requirements.
27. Require the Project Engineer to strictly
observe proper construction procedures in the
placing of tie bars.
28. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to patch the chipped edge of the pavement and
provide road shoulders to prevent further
chippings.
1. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to provide sufficient shouldering materials
and compact the same to the required density.
2. Reprocess the materials by screening to
conform with the grading requirements.
3. Require the Contractor,at his own expense,
to reconstruct the shoulders to conform with
the approved plan.
4. Remove and replace the noted substandard
shouldering materials to conform with the
specifications.
5. Require the Project Engineer to explain in
 simultaneously with the pavement base. writing why shoulders were not constructed
simultaneously with the base.

6. Road shouldering materials were not 6. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
provided. to provide the required shouldering materials.

A.5 Related Shoulders

1. Side ditch was not provided in the 1. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
project. to provide the necessary wide ditch to conform
with the plans.

2. Undefined side ditches and roadway 2. Require the Project Engineer, at his pwn
crown were observed on some sections. expense, to provide sufficient mix between
intertices ofboulders for rubble concrete
masonry.

3. Insufficient concrete mix was provided 3. Require the project Engineer, at his own
between intertices of boulders for rubble expense,to provide sufficient mix
concrete masonry.

4. Clogged/silted lined canal was noted. 4. Require contractor, at his own expense to
declog/desilt the lined canal.

5. Damaged/collapsed portion of grouted 5. Require contractor, at his own expense, to

riprap was observed. redo the damaged/collapsed section of the
grouted riprap.

6. Misalignment of laid reinforced concrete 6. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
pipe culvert was observed. to redo the misaligned RCPC.

7. Improper slope construction of CHB 7. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
lined canal was noted. to redo the sections noted with improper slope
construction to conform with the plans.

8. Vertical bars of lined canal were not 8. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
extended up to it's key. to institute remedial measures on the noted
deficiency to conform with the plans.

9. Installed RCPC do not have the required 9. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
tongue and groove ends. to remove the installed RCPC without the
required tongue and groove and replace with
acceptable materials.

10. Inadequate mortar flushing was noted 10. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
inside the RCPC joints. to provide sufficient mortar flushing at joints.

11. Undersized RCPC was installed in the 11. Remove and replace the undersized RCPC
project. installed to conform with the plans.

12. Boulders/stones used in stone masonry 12. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
 headwall don't conform with the to reconstruct the stone masonry headwall to
specifications. conform with the specifications.

13. Insufficient backfill/materials for Item 13. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
504 (Grouted Riprap) were noted. to provide the required volume of backfill
materials for Item 504.

14. Installed RC pipes were noted to be 14. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
lower than the outlet elevation. to rework the portion where the pipes were
improperly installed.

15. Insufficient/no collaring on RC pipes 15. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
was noted. to provide sufficient mortar for collaring of
RC pipes.

16. Foundation for grouted riprap was not 16. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
provided. to reconstruct the grouted riprap to conform with
approved plans and specifications.

17. Use of poof quality concrete hollow 17. Redo the lined canal with poor quality of
blocks on lined canal was noted. concrete hollow blocks.

18. Severely damaged headwall was 19. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
observed. to rework the severely damaged headwall.

B. Asphalt Pavement
B.1 Pavement

1. Per test results, the bulk specific gravity 1. Require the concerned Materials Engineer
of asphalt core samples are lower than to implement strictly proper materials quality
the specified design requirement. control implementations.

2. Test results on Asphalt samples taken 2. Require the concerned Materials Engineer
showed that asphalt content was higher to implement strictly proper materials quality
than the designed requirement. control implementtation.

3. Ravelling and depressions of the asphalt 3. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
pavement due to base failure were to remove and replace the damaged portion
observed. of the asphalt pavement and to reconstruct the
base to conform with the plans.

4. Depressions were observed on 4. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,

intermittent sections of the complete to rework the sections with depressions.
pavement.

5. Ravelloing was observed on some 5. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
portions of the completed pavement. to reworki the sections with ravelling.

6. Surface pumping of water was observed 6. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
on the asphalt overlay the intermittent to redo the intermittent sections noted with
sections of the completed pavement. surface pumping of water.

7. Peeled-off center line and edge pavement 7. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
markings were observed. to repaint the center line and edge markings.
8. Alligator cracks were noted at 8. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
intermittent sections. to redo the road sections with alligator cracks.

9. A combination of bleeding, depression, 9. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,

major ravelling,pothholes and alligator to redo / remove and replace the sections
cracks were observed on the completed with noted defects.
pavement.

10. Severe longitudinal cracks were 10. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
observed on the completed pavement. to remove and replace the sections with
severe longitudinal cracks.

11. The completed asphalt pavement was 11. Deduct from payment due to the contractor
deficient in thickness. the amount equivalent to thickness deficiency.

12. No quality tests were made on asphalt 12. Require Project / Materials Engineer to
mix prior to its use in the project. adhere proper materials and construction
quality control.

13. Inadequate resealing of the asphalt 13. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
pavement was noted (MBC). to rework the resealing of the asphalt pavement.

B.2 Shoulder

1. Oversized aggregates for shouldering 2. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
were observed. to reprocess the shouldering materials to conform
with the grading requirements.

2. Unlevelled shoulder was noted. 2. Provide additional shouldering materials

to conform with the requirements and
compact same to the required density.

B.3 Related Structures

1. Clogged inlet and outlet of the drainage 1. require the Contractor, at his own expense,
structure were noted. to declog the drainage structure.

2. Inadequate cement mortar was observed 2. Redo the grouted riprap noted with
between the interstices of boulders of inadequate cement mortar to conform to
grouted riprap per boring conducted. plans and specifications.

C. Others

1. Project had already incurred a negative 1. Require the Project/Res. Engineer to

slippage of 18.0% explain in writing why no calibrated aaction
was taken on the negative slippage pursuant
to D.O. No. 102, Series of 1988.
 BRIDGES
FINDINGS
A. Sub-Structure
1. Plywood was used instead of the required
pre-molded joint filler from back wall to
girder joints.
2. R.C. Piles driven were cut to
approximately 50% of its length.
3. Reinforcing steel bar samples used in
casting the regular piles failed to meet the
tensile strength requirement.
4. The two (2) constructed piers were
leaning forward at the right resulting to a
wider gap between span. Likewise,
cracks were noted on the pile coping.
5. Non - provision of steel bearing between
girder and pile coping was observed.
6. Coco trunk was embedded at side slope
of bridge Approach B.
7. steel angle for pile tip was not constructed
in accordance with standard plans and
specifications.
8. Vertical cracks were noted at the right
and left outlet wingwall of the bridge.
9. The casting legnth of the concrete piles is
longer than what is actually necessary.
10. The clearance between the installed
form and rebars was not in accordance
with the approved plan. The installed
rebars were not centered inside the form.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Require the Conteactor at his own expense, to
remove the plywood used for the backwall to
girder joints and replace it with the required pre-
molded joint filler.
2. Requires the Chief of Planning and Design to
explain why results of subsurface exploration was
not used as basis of design since casted piles driven
were longer than needed.
3. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
remove and replace all casted piles represented by
failed samples.
4. Require the Contractor, ta his own expense, to
remove and reconstruct the two (2) leaning piers
and coping with cracks.
5. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to provide steel bearing pad for connector as
required in the standard plan.
6. Require the Contractor to remove the coco
trunk embedded at the side slope of the bridge
approach.
7. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to remove the substandard steel angle for pile
tip and replace it with material conforming with
specifications.
8. Require the contractor, at his own expense,
to network both wingwalls with vertical cracks
to conform with the approved plans and
specifications
9. Require the chief of the plannning and design
division and concerned project engineer to
explain in writing why a casting length of
pre-stressed pile which is more than what is
actually necessary was recommended
10. Require the concerned project engineer to
immediately correct the vertical alignment of the
rebars of column post and observe correct
clearance between rebars and forms prior to
concrete pouring.
 B. Approach

1. Insufficient compaction of base course 1. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
materials incorporated on bridge tocorrect the depression noted and recompact
approaches and depression on the finished the base course materials on approaches
surface were noted.

2. Oversized aggregates and inadequate 2. Require tne Cxontractor, at his own expense,
binder materials of aggregate base were to remove the oversized materials noted and
observed on stockpile. blend it with adequate binder.

3. Flex beam quadrails were not provided 3. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,.
on the bridge approaches although the to provide the required flexbeam quadrail on
bridge was already open to vehicular the bridge approaches to conform to the plans.
traffic.

4. All flexbeam quadrails installed on the 4. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
sections have rusts and insufficient bolts to steel brush the rusty flexbeam quadrails and
and washers. provide additional bolts and washers.

5. Potholes and segregation of aggregates 5. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
due to undefined roadway crown and side to patch the potholes and provide roadway
ditches at intermittent sections were noted. crown and side ditches on the noted road
sections.

6. Embankment materials were not laid and 6. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
compacted in layer of 20 cm thickness to redo the embankment at Approach A in
which resulted to uneven settlement of the accordance with the approved plans and
embankment fill at Approach A. specifications and observe proper compaction
. of embankment.

7. Minor scaling was observed on the 7. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
bridge approachees. to apply epoxy mortar on the completed
apporach slab noted with minor scaling.

8. High plastic anapog materials was used 8. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
for embankment. to remove the sections of embankment where
anapog materials were used and replace it with
right materials conforming to specifications.

9. Eroded/damaged shoulders was observed 9. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
at bridge approach. to redo the eroded / damaged shoulder on the
bridge approach.

10. Non - provision of precautionary signs 10. Require the Contractor,at his own expense,
on bridge approaches was observed. to provide precautionary sign on bridege
approaches.

11. Embankment materials for approach 11. Require the contractor, at his own expense,
were not spread and compacted in layers to rework the embankment at Approach follow-
of 20.0cm thickness. ing proper construction methods.
12. Longitudinal cracks along side slope of 12. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
bridge approach was observed. to seal with concrete epoxy the cracks noted
along the side slope of the bridge approach.

13. Oversized sub - base materials partially 13.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
spreaded on the bridge approach were to remove the oversized sub - base materials
noted. and replace it with acceptable materials con -
formed to specifications.

14. Potholes were noted on the bridge 14. Require the contractor, at his own expense,
approaches. to repair the bridge approaches with potholes
to conform the approved plans and
specifications.

15. Rust was noted on the flex beam 15. Require the contractor, at his own expense,
quadrails at approaches of the bridge. to remove the rust by steel brushing and paint
the flex beam quadrails.

16. Thick vegetation was observed on both 16. Require the contractor, at his own expense,
sides of the approaches. to remove the vegetation on the approaches.

17. Embankment materials instead of Item 17. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
200 were used o0n the bridge approach. to remove and replace embankmennt materials
with suitable Item 200, Aggregate Sub - base
Course materilas on bridge approach.

18. No crown was observed throughout 18. Require the contractpor, at his own expense,
the length of the approaches. to reshape the entire length of bridge approaches
by providing proper crowning to conform with
the plan.

19. Lack of bolts on metal guard rail 19. Require the contractor, at his own expense,
connection to concrete post was to provide the required number of bolts on the
observed. guardrails.

20. Scoured base materials was observed 20. Require the contractor, at his own expense,
beneath the wingwall. to provide base course materials on the noted
scoured portion to prevent further deterioration.

C. Slope Protection

1. Unconstructed footing and top portion 1. Require the Contractor,at his own expense,
anchorage of the grouted riprap were to remove and replace the grouted riprap were
observed. footing and top portion anchorage were not
constructed.

2. Insufficient number of weepholes was 2. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
noted. to provide additional weepholes to conform
with the plans.
3. Oversized agrregates (more than 3" in dia.) 3.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,.
were noted on the surface of the to reprocess the noted oversized aggregates
approaches. by screening to conform with the grading
requirements.

4. Bedding was not compacted prior to 4.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
laying of boulders. to reconstruct the newly started riprapping
works in accordance with the coorect proce -
dures in the construction of a grouted riprap.

5. Mortar was not provided in between 5. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
stone layers of the grouted riprap. to redo the grouted riprap in accordance with
the approved plans and specifications.

6. Non - provision of the required loose 6.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
boulder apron and 250mm thick gravel to provide loose boulder apron and gravel
backing on the constructed grouted riprap backing on the grouted riprap revetment of all
of both approaches was observed. bridges.

7. Cracks were noted at left side of 7.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
approaches was observed. to seal with cement mortarthe cracks noted
on the grouted riprap.

8. Non -provision of weepholes on the slope 8.Require the Contractor,at his own expense,
protection was observed. to provide weepholes on the slope protection
to conform with the plans.

9. The grouted riprap for embankment 9.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
protection was deficient in height. to redo the embankment protection structure
Moreover, the depth of the footing does to conform with the plans.
not conform with the requirement.

10. Stone masonry for abutments A and B 10.Require the Contractor, t his own expense,
has insufficient cement mortar between to redo the stone masonry structures to conform
stone interstices, and not provided with with the approved plans and specifications.
weepholes. Test pitting also indicates
that the depth of foundation does not
conform with the requirements.

11. Lower portion of grouted riprap on 11.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
abutments was overhanging due to to redo the grouted riprap foundation on bridge
non-provision of foundation. abutments to conform with the approved plans

and specifications.

12. The longest faces of the stone/boulder 12.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
were not placed perpendicular to the side to remove and reconstruct all grouted riprap
slope. in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications.

13. Unsealed cracks of slope protection 13.Require the contractor, at his own expense,
 works were noted. to rework the slope protection works with
unsealed cracks.

14. Cracks on grouted riprap at Abutmnet 14.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
were noted. to repair the grouted riprap at Abutment with
cracks.

15. Severe cracks on the completed riprap 15.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
of the bridge approach were noted. to rework the completed riprap with severe
cracks.

16. Scouring of grouted riprap was 16. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
observed. to institute corrective measures on the noted
deficiency.

17. Use of undesize rock in riprapping works 17.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
was noted. to remove the undersized rocks for riprapping
and replace it with right materials conforming
to specifications.

18. Improper construction method of the 18.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
rubble concrete were observed. to redo the improper construction of rubble
concrete.

19.The foundation for grouted riprap is 19.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
deficient in depth per test pitting to redo the completed grouted riprap with defi-
conducted. cient foundation depth to conform with the ap -
proved plans and specifications.

20.Side drains were not constructed on the 20.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
completed riprap along the bridge. to provide / construct with drains on the com-
pleted riprap along the bridge.

21.Longitudinal cracks were noted on top of 21.Require the contractor, at his own expense,
the completed grouted riprap,both sides,of to redo the portion of grouted riprap with
bridge approach. logitudinal cracks.

22.Improper laying of boulders for Item 504, 22.Require the Project / Resident Engineer
Grouted riprap was observed as boulders were to observe strictly proper construction methods
laid simultaneously with the compaction of the for Item 504.
sideslope using handtamper.Likewise,the app -
lication of mortar in between spaces of boulders
was noted to be insufficient.

23.Insufficient grout in between spaces of 23.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
boulders and cracks were observed on the to redo the sections of grouted riprap with cracks
completed sections of Item 504,Grouted and insufficient cement mortar in between spaces
Riprap. of boulders.

24.series of restraint cracks were noted on 24.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
rubble concrete facing at the bridge approach. to seal the cracks with concrete epoxy.
D. Superstructure

1. Severe cracks were observed on the berm. 1.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to redo the berm with severe cracks.

2.Improper splicing of steel bars on the installed 2.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
reinforcement for the slab and rusty reinforcing to correct splicing of rebars and steel brush all
steel bars were observed. the rusty steel bars prior to concrete pouring.

3.Inadequate paint was applied on the steel 3.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
members of the superstructure was noted. to repaint the steel members to prevent the pre-
mature rusting of the structure.

4.Honeycombs were noted on the bridge 4.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
diapraghm. to plaster with the cement mortar the noted
honeycombs.

5.The reinforced concrete retaining wall was 5.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
deficient in length. to construct the deficient length of the reinforced
concrete retaining wall to conform with the
approved plans and specifications.

6.Cast iron pipes, instead of the required gal - 6.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
vanized iron pipes were used as slab drain. to replace the cast ironpipe used as slab drain
of the bridge with the required galvanized iron
pipes.

7.Unpainted installed bailey panels were noted. 7.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to paint the installed bailey panels.

8.Non - provision of the required trowel dep - 8.Require the Rontractor, at his own expense,
ressionm of the inlets of the drainage of bridge to provide the required trowel depression on
structure was noted. inlets of drain pipes.

9.Deficient width of the completed bridge side - 9.Deduct from payment due the cfontractor the
walk was observed. area corresponding to the deficiency in the
width of the completed bridge sidewalk.

10.Poor quality painting materials was observed 10.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
as manifested by peeling - off of paints on to repaint the bridge using paints conforming to
concrete railing,concrete post and wing walls specifications.
of the concrete bridge.

11.Missing nuts or anchor bolts on the bridge 11.Require the Contractor,at his own expense,
girders were noted. to provide nuts of anchor bolts on girders.
12.Presence of discarded hardened concrete
mix on bridge concrete slab was observed.
13.Damaged pre - molded filler was noted for
expansion joints of the bridge slab and side -
walk.
14.Pre - molded joint sealant for backwall to
girder connections were not provided on both
abutments of the bridge.
15.Hairline cracks were observed on the
deck slab.
16.The number of anchor bolts used as girder -
to- girder connectors of the pre -cast concrete
slab, is lower than the requirement but the
same paid based on the total number of pieces
required.
17.Minor scaling on blocks and the link slab
was being corrected by applying cement
topping.
18. Plywood, instead of elstomeric pad, was
use at the joint connection between backwall
and bridge superstructure
19. Dowel bars for the proposed diaphram
were indiscriminately cut in order to accomo-
date the placement forms, thus, decreasing
the anchorage strength of both
12.Require the Contractor to remove and
dispose the hardened concrete mix noted on
the concrete bridge deck slab.
13.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to replace the deteriorated pre - molded filler.
14.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to provide pre - molded joint sealant for
backwall to girder connection on the abutments
of the bridge to conform with the plan.
15.Require the implementing office to monitor
the noted cracks on the slab and if further
deterioration occurs within the warranty period,
rework, the slab at the contractor's own expense.
16.Require the Chief of Planning and Design
Section to assess the structural integrity of the
pre-cast, slabs, particularly the girder-to-girder
connections, and recommend / submit appro -
priate action.likewise, the Project Engineer is
directed to explain in writing why the required
anchor bolts were paid although the total quantity
were not actually incorporated into the works.
17. Require the contractor, at his own expense,
to remove all cement toppings on all blocks
with minor scaling and apply same with epoxy
mortar.
18. Require the contractor, at his own expense,
to remove the plywood and provide the
elastomeric pad at the joint connection
between backwall and bridge superstructure
19. Require the consultants Project/Resident
Eng'rs. to submit to the Bureau of Design, for
approval, a scheme of corrections for the pro-
posed diaphragm connecting two (2) girders
wherein some dowel bars are cut to accomo-
date placement of forms and a sctuctural
evaluation report relativeto the noted
non-conformance of longitudinal gap of 2.54cm.

E. Others
1. Construction water flow due to non-
removal of excaveted materials, debris, and
bolders along the waterway was observed
2.The project has incurred a negative
slippage of 39.467%.
3.Sampling of concrete cylinders was solely
done by the contructor's representative without
the presence of the concerned government
engineers.
4. No slump test was done prior to concrete
pouring of the bridge slab.
5.One- bagger mixer was being use for
concreting works.
6. the waterway under the bridge was blocked
by old timber pier.
7. Protruding wooden piles were observed to
be obstructing the flow of water.
III. SCHOOL BUILDINGS
between girders. Likewise, require him to
explain in writing why he should not be held
liable for the deviations noted from the
approved plans and specifications.
1.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
to remove the excaveted materials, debris and
boulders along the waterway.
2.Require the project engineer to explain in
writing why no calibrated action per department
order #102, series of 1988 was done
3.Require the project/Resident /Materials
Engineers to explain in writing why obtaining
of concrete cylinder samples by the contructor's
representative are beimg done in the project
without their presence.
4.Require the Project/Materials Engineer to
strictly enforce proper materials quality control
in the project or to conduct core boring test
to check wether the concrete meet strength
requirement.
5. Require the Contractor to provide the ne-
cessary equipment as stipulated in the approved
program of work.
6. Require the Conratcor, at his own expense,
to remove the old timber pier obstructing the
waterway of the bridge.
7. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to remove the wooden piles to prevent
obstructing the flow of water.
FINDINGS/OBSERVATIONS: RECOMMENDATIONS:

A. Foundation, Flooring Stuctures and Stairs

1. Deficient thickness of the slab on fill was 1. Deduct from payment due the Contractor the
noted. amount equivalent to the thickness deficiency
of the slab.

2. Last step of the stairs was not levelled with 2. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
the record floor slab elevation. to correct the last step of stairs to conform with
the plan.

3. Cracks were noted on cement topping of 3. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
the concrete slab. to network the cement topping of the concrete
slab with cracks.

4. Honeycombs were noted on the bottom 4. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
slab of second floor. to plaster the noted honeycombs with cement
mortar.

5. Protruding rebars of beam intended for 5. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
future expansion was not painted to paint the protruding beam rebars with
lead/red oxide for rust protection lead/red oxide.

6. The spacing of reinforcement was not in 6. Deduct the amount equivalent to the number
accordance with the approved plans and of steel bars not actually incorporated into the
specifications. project from the payment of the contractor.

7. Inadequate steel floor drain and strainer was 7. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
installed to provide adequate floor drain to conform
with plans.

8. Defective concrete flooring covered with 8. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
mortar topping was observed. to network the defective concrete flooring with
mortar topping to conform with the approved
plan.

B. Column, Wall, Window and Door

1. Concrete hollow blocks of inferior quality 1. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
were used in the masonry work for walling. to remove the CHB used for walling and re-
place it with right material conforming to the
approved specifications.

2. Bolts were not provided on metal straps 2. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
connecting truss amd column. to provide bolts on all metal straps.

3. Base board was not provided on partitions 3. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
of the completed school building. to provide base board on all partitions.

4. Insufficient nails were provided on 4.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
partitions. to provide additonal nails for partitions.

5. Splits, knots and decay on some jalousie 5. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
blades and window jambs were observed. to remove and replace all defective jalousie
blades and window jambs.

6. Cracks were observed on the partitions of 6. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
the newly constructed stage. to seal all cracks noted on the partitions of the
newly constructed stage with concrete epoxy.

7. Schedules of doors an window(grills) were 7. Deduct the payment due the Contractor the
not followed, hence, quantities as per amount equivalent to the deficiency noted.
approved progrma of work were overstated.

8. Actual column dimensions for 2CL school 8. Deduct the cost corresponding to the defi-
building were not in accordance approved ciency in volume of column from the final pay-
plans. ment of the Contractor.

9. The sixteen- meter span of 4" CHB walling 9. Require the Section Chief of planning and
was constructed wothout any column/stiffener Design to explain in writing why the sixteen
meter span of 4" CHB walling was designed
without column/stiffener.

10. Cracks were noted to be the prevalent on 10. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
the exterior and interior CHB walls. to seal the cracks with concrete epoxy.

11. Lumbers used for window and door jambs 11. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
were not of the required specie. to remove and replace the lumbers used for
window and door jambs with the required
specie.

12. Insufficient putty applied on glass windows 12. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
was observed. to provide sufficient putty on glass window.

13. Laid bricks at the outside walls of the 13. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
building were not properly aligned. to network the laid bricks at the outside wall
of the building to conform with the correct
alignment.

14. Plastering works on columns and beams 14.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
was observed to bulge at least 0.5cm form to network the plastering of columns and
the edges. beams.

15. Rusty window steel casement was 15. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
observed. to remove the rust on the window steel
casement prior ro paint application.

16. Insufficient paint was observed on the end 16. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
wall. to repain the endwalls of the building.

17. Rough/unsanded wooden jalousie blades 17. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
was observed. to institute corrective measures on the
deficiencies noted.

18. Peeling-off of paint was observed on the 18.Require the contructur, at his own expense,
completed school building. to repaint portion of the completed building that
peeled-off.
19. Non-provision of wooden baseboard 19. Require the contructor, at his own expense,
on the partation of the completed school to provide wooden baseboard on the partation
building. of the completed school building.

20.Honeycomb were observed on beams and 20.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
columns causing the reinforcing steel bars to to plaste/patch the honeycombs on beams and
expose. columns.

21.Four (4mm) thick plywood was used as 21Deduct from payment due to the contructor
partation instead of 6mm thickness as required the price difference between 4mm and 6mm
thick plywood.

22.Spacing of vertical RSB was not in 22.Deduct from payment due to the contructor
accordance with the required 0.60m. the amount corresponding to the vertical RSB
witch were not incorporated into the work.

23. Some blades of the wooden jalousies were 23. Require the contractor, at his own expense,
slightly deformed. to remove and replace the slightly damage
wooden jalousie blades.

24.Concrete pouring was done on beams and 24. Require the Project/Materials engineer to
columns without the presence of the project/ explain in writing why pouring of concrete on
materials engineener. column and beams were not closely supervised.

C. Roof and Roof Framing

1.Gusset Plate connecting the top and bottom 1.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
chords of steel trusses were spot welded to provide the required 4.75mmm fillet weld on
instead of providing the 4.75mm fillet weld as all steel truss connection to conform with the
called for in the plan. approved plans and specification.

2.Concrete for roof beams, girder and slabs 2.Require the chief of planning and design
were not poured monothically, section to assess the stability of the structure &
recommend/submit appropriate scheme of
correction prior to the actual work.

3.deviations were noted on the schedule 3.Require the concerned project engineer to
of reinforcement for the construction of roof observe correct arrangement roof beams to
beams. conform with the approved plans and
specification.

4.Use of 3/16" thick plywood for ceiling 4.Deduct from payment due the contructor the
instead of 1/4" thick as required in the approved amount equivalent to the thickness deficiency
program of work. of the plywood actually used in the project.

5.The top chord was noted to be deficient in 5.Deduct the amount corresponding to the
dimension. cost difference between the actual and the
required sizes of top chords used from the final
 payment the contructor.

6.inadequate machine bolts were noted on the 6.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
trusses. to provide additional machine bolts on the
trusses.

7.Spacing of purlins were not constructed as 7.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
per approved plans. to redo the purlins to the required spacing to
conform with the plans and specification.

8.Rusts were noted on the unpainted roofing 8.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
steel members. to brush off the rusts on roofing steel members
prior to painting.

9.Plywoods on the ceiling were observed to 9.Require the contructopr, at his expense,
have boreholes. to remove and replace the plywood in the ceiling
with boreholes.

10.Ceiling was already installed without the 10.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
necessary tension rod s on all trusses. to provide the tension rod on all trusses to
conform with plan.

11.Only 1-1/2 corrugations sidelapping was 11.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
used for G.I. roofing sheet instead of the 2-1/2 to redo the side lapping corrugation of the
corrugations requirement. installed G.I. roofing sheets to conform with
the plan.

12. No wood cleats were provided on the 12.Require the contructor,at his own expense,
installed purlins. to provide wood cleats on the installed purlins.

13.Non-provision of plain G.I. and flashing 13.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
was observed on roofing. to provide plain G.I.end flashing on roofing.

14. Warping of fascia board was observed 14. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to remove and replace the warped fascia board.

15. Insufficient angle bars for trusses was noted. 15. Require the Contractor, at his own expense
to provide the required number of angle bars
for trusses to conform with the approved plans.

16. Undersized fascia boards were installed. 16. Require the Contractor, at his own expense
to remove and replace the undersized fascia
board installed to conform with the plan.

17. Undersized plywood was used in the 17. Deduct from payment due the contractor
construction of ceiling. the amount equivalent to the price difference
between the specified and undersized
plywood.

D. Fixtures and Others

1. The project has already in curred a 1. Require the Project Enginer to explain in
negative slippage. writing why no calibrated action was taken on
the negative slippage per D.O. 102, series
of 1988.

2. Lavatory fixtures and other plumbing 2. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
appurtenances were not installed. to provide the lavatory fixtures and plumbing
appurtenances to conform with the approved
plan.

3. Damaged tiles were observed on the sink 3. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
and lavatory of the newly completed comfort to remove the damaged tiles on the sink and
room. lavatory and replace them with new ones.

4. Pozzolan cement type "p" instead of portland 4. Require the Project Engineer to explain in
cement was used in concreting works. writing why pozzolan cement type "p" allowed
to be used in concreting works.

5. Materials incorporated into the project 5. Require the Project Engineer/Materials

were not tested prior to use. Engineer to explain in writing why the materials
were not tested prior to use in the project.

6. Concrete drainage and catch basin of the 6. Require the Contractor, at his won expense,
school building were not constructed. to construct the required concrete drainage
and catch basin of the school building to conform
with the approved plan.

7. Edges at the security grill openings were 7. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
not properly shaped. to reshape the edged of the security grill
openings properly.

8. The installed water closet was not of the 8. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
required type or brand. to remove the installed water closet and repalce
it with the required brand.
 FLOOD CONTROL AND DRAINAGE

FINDING RECOMMENDATION

A. Riprap and stone masonry

1.Insufficient mortrar filling was noted on 1.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
riprapping works. to provide sufficient mortar filling on riprap.

2.Weepholes were not provided, on grouted 2.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
riprap. to provide the required weepholes to conform
with the approved plans.

3.The grouted riprap was observed to be 3.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
deficient in thickness. to redo the grouted riprap to conform with
the plans.

4.Non-compaction of backfill marterials was 4.Require the contructor,at his own expense,
observed. to compact the materials to the required density.

6.Deficient slope was noted on the completed 6.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
structure. to redo the stucture to conform with the plans.

7.Improper placing/laying of stones was noted. 7.Rquire the contructor, athis own expense,
to redo placing/laying of stones to conform
with the plans.

8.Hairline cracks on tip width of stones masonry 8.Require the contructor,at his own expense,
were note. toseal the note cracks with concrete expoxy.

9.Insufficient volume of grouted escombro fill 9.Require the contructor,at his own expense,
was observed to incorporate into the work the total volume of
gouted escombo fill to conform with the
approved plans.

10.Undersize rock/boulder on stock pile was 10.Require the project materials engineer to
observed. reject the undersized boulders note on the stock
pile.

12.The concrete anchorage of grouted riprap 12.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
was deficient in thickness. to rework the concrete anchorage of the grouted
riprap to conform with the approved plans and
specification.

13.High plasticity anapog materials usedf as 13.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
embankment was observed. to remove and replace section of embankment
where high plastic anapog materials were used.

14.Undersize boulder were used in the goruted 14.Require the contructor, athis own expense,
riprap. to redo the grouted riprap using the right size
of boulders to conform with specification.
15.Uncompacted embankment fill was noted. 15.Require the cintructor, at his own expense,
to recompact the embankment fill to meet the
required density.

B.Culverts, Pipe and Lined Canal

1.Damage manhole inlet was noted. 1.Require the Contructor, at his own expense,
to rework the damaged manhole inlet.

2.RCBC cover was missing. 2.Require the contructor, to provide the missing
RCBC cover, at his own expense.

3.Crack along the drainage sidewalk were note 3. Require the contructor, at his own expense,
to apply concrete epoxey on the cracks noted
on drainage sidewalk.

4.No mortar cement plaster on the inner 4.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
surface of CHB lined canal was observed. to plaster the inner surface of the CHB lined
canal.

5.Damage concrete flooring and column of the 5.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
lined canal were observed. to rework the damaged portion/sections of the
lined canal to conform with the approved plans.

6.The concrete flooring of lined canal was noted 6.Deduct payment due to the contructor the
to be deficient in length. amount equivalent to the deficiency in length.

7.Severe transverse cracks were noted on 7.Require the contructor ,at his own expense,
concrete lined canal. to redo the portion of the concrete lined canal
with severe transverse cracks.

8.Severe crocks on headwall were noted. 8. Require the contructor,at his own expense,
to redo the portions of the headwall with severe
cracks.

9.Insufficient mortar for collaring was observe. 9.Require the contructor,at his own expense,
to provide sufficient mortar for collaring.

10.honeycombs on concrete manhole were 10.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
observed. to plasterd the honeycomb note with cement
mortar.

11.Misaligned drainage canal was note. 11.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
to corect the alignement of drainage canal.

12.Damage section of grouted riprap-line canal 12.Require the contructor, at his onw expense,
was observed. to rework the damaged section of the grouted
riprap.

13.Clogged drainage pipes and manholes due 13.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
to unfinished portion of the drainage system to expedite the completion of the and to declog
were noted. the drainage pipe and manhole, at his own
expense.
14.no concrete flooring was observed on the 14.Require the contructor,athis own expense,
lined canal. to provide concrete flooring to conform with
the plans.

15.Non-provision of boulders bedding for lined 15.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
canal was observed. to reconstruct the lined canal to conform with
the approved plans.

16.Damage PCP at the openning of drainage 16.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
structure was observed. to remove and replace the damage RCP.

17.Collapsed upper portion of open canal wall 17. Require the contructor, at his own expense,
was observed. to reworks the damage upper portion of the
open canal wall.

18.Severe crack on the constructed driveway 18.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
across the lined canal was noted. to reworks the portion / section of the driveway
with severe cracks.

19.Stagnant water on the linend canal was 19.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
noted. to check / clean the drainage outlet to remove
the stagnant water in the lined canal.

20.Non-provision of concrete topping on the 20.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
bottom surface of the drainage canal was noted. to provide concrete topping at the bottom
surface of the drainage canal.

21.Honeycomb on manhole were observed. 21.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
to plaster the noted honeycombs on manhole
with cement mortar.

22.Debris / vegetation on canal was noted. 22.Require the contructor,at his own expense,
to remove the debris and vegetation on the
canal.

23.Damage RCPC headwall was noted. 23.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
to redo the damage RCPC headwall.

24.Silted RCPC was noted. 24.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
to declog the silted RCPC.

25.Poor quality concrete mix was observed on 25.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
the completed wingwall. to reworks the wingwall to conform with the
approved plans and specification.

C.Dams, Spillway, Spurdikes, Gabions and Revetment wall

1.Wased out / damaged spurdikes and grouted 1.Require the contructor,at his own expense,
riprap were noted. to reworks/ reconstruct the damaged structures.

2.Transverse cracks were noted on the top 2.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
gravity wall. to seal the noted transverse crack with concrete

3.The gabion mattress was observed to be
deficient in area;.
4.Non-provision of cut-off wall was observed.
5.Insufficient boulders on gabion mattress
revetment and gabion toe protection was noted.
6.Bulging and honeycomb on the foundation
stem were noted.
7.The depth and width of apron were noted
to be deficient .
8.Sections of driven steel sheet piles were not
interlocked with each other.
9.Erosion, cave-in, scouring, potholes,
longitudinal and transversal cracks on
embankment and side slopes.
10.Water seepage at the bottom of the dam
was noted.
11.The concrete bedding for the rubble
concrete revetment was noted to be deficient
in thickness.
12.No cut-off wall was provided on the dike
riprap.
13.No concrete matting was noted.
14.Damage section of seawall was observed.
epoxy.
3.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
to rework the gabion mattress to conform with
the plans.
4.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
to provide the cut-off wall to conform with the
plans.
5.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
to provide sufficient boulders on the gabion
mattress and toe protection to conform with
approved plans and specification.
6.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
to institute remedial measures on bulging and
honeycomb noted on the foundation stem.
7.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
to correct the width and depth of the apron.
8.Require the contructor,at his own expense,
to correct the interlocking of the sections of
driven steel sheet pile.
9.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
to redo the structures to conform with the plans.
10.Request the bureau of design to check and
investegate the said water seepage so that the
immediate remedial measures can be instituted.
11.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
to redo the rubble concrete revetment to
conform with the approved plans and
specification.
12.Require the chief of planning and design
section to check and investigate the stability
of the dike riprap structure wherein cut-off
wall was not provide and recommend
appropraite scheme of correction.
13.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
to provide the concrete matting to conform
with the approved plans and specification.
14.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
to institute necessary correction on the damaged

15.Insufficient backfill materials were noted.
16.Piles were not driven properly.
17. Deficient width of pile cap was noted.
18. Hairline cracks were noted at the top of
the river control project.
19. Deficient elevation of the earthdike section
was noted.
20. Improperly filled gabion baskets at the riv-
erside and landslide was note.
21. Indufficient/ undersized RSB was noted.
22. Improper alignment of newly poured
revetment was noted.
23. Improper spacing of RSB was noted.
24. Rusty steel bars on the unpoured portion
of the concrete revetment was noted.
25. Rusty gabion was observed on wire mesh.
26. Non-provision of end protection for
shoreline was observed.
27. Scoured cut-off wall was noted.
section of the structure to prevent further
deterioration.
15.Require the contructor,at his own expense,
to provide adequate backfill materials.
16.Require the contructor, at his own expense,
to remove and redrive the improperly driven
piles.
17. Require the contractor, at his own expense,
to remove and replace the pile cap width defic-
ient width to conform with the approved plans
and specifications.
18. Require the Contractor, at his own
expense, to seal the hairline cracks with
concrete expoxy.
19. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to correct the elevation of the earthdike to con-
form the approved plans.
20. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to properly fill the gabion baskets to conform to
the approved plans and specifications.
21. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to removed the undersized RSB and replace w-
ith the correct size.
22. Require the Contractor at his own expense,
to institute corrective measures on the improper
alignment of the newly poured revetment to
conform with the approved palns and
specifications.
23. Require the Contractor at his own expense,
to correct the spacing of RSB prior to pouring
of concrete.
24. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to steel brush the rusty steel bars prior to
concrete pouring.
25. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to remove and replace all rusty gabion wire mesh.
26. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to provide the end protection of the shorline to
conform with the plan
27. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to removed and replace the scoured cut-off wall.
28. Deficient thickness of gravel bedding was
noted. 28. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to redo the deficient thickness of gravel bedding.

29. Hairline cracks and minor scaling on the 29. Require the Contracotr, at his own expense,
face of rubble concrete was observed. to apply concrete epoxy on hairline cracks and
minor scaling
V. PORTS AND HARBORS

FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS

A. PILES

1. Severe honeycombs on casted concrete 1. Require the Project/Materials Engineer to

piles were observed reject the casted concrete piles with severe
honeycombs.

2. Installed R.C. piles were not aligned. 2. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
correct the alignment of R.C. piles.

3. Cracks were observed on driven piles. 3. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
to remove and replace the driven files with
cracks.

4. No pile log record was noted on driven 4. Require the Project/Materials Engineer to
piles. explain in writing why no pile log record was
maintained in the project site.

5. The required number if piles was note to be 5. Require the Project/Materials Engineer to
deficient as required in the plan explain in writing why the required number if piles
was not followed.

6. Dimension of the casted piles does not 6. Require the Project/Materials Engineer to
conform to the plans. reject the casted piles which do not conform with
the dimension requirements.

7. Timber piles have splits and termites. 7. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
to remove and replace the detective timber piles.

8. Loose straps for timber piles were 8. Require the Contractor, to tighten the straps of
observed. timber piles in accordance with the approved
plans and specifications.

9. Untreated driven cluster timber piles were 9. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
noted. remove and replace the treated timber piles.

10. Used of DPWH equipment for driving of 10. Require the Project Engineer to explain in
piles without approved lease contract. writing why no approved lease contract was
made with the Contractor for using the DWH
equipment.

11. Driven cluster timber piles were not of the 11. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
required specie or its equivalent as specified in to withdraw the driven piles and replace it with
the plans. piles conforming to the approved plans and
 specifications.

12. Timber piles at the stockpiles were not of 12. Require the Project/Materials Engineer to
the required size/diameter. reject the timber piles on stockpiled which does
not conform to the plans and specifications.

13. Inefficient pile driving equipment in the 13. Require the Contractor to use efficient
project was noted. equipment for pile driving.

14. Improper driving of concrete piles resulting 14. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to crushing spalling of concrete. to undertake corrective measures on the
damaged piles.

15. Concrete piles casted on site were not true 15. Require the Project Engineer to disallow the
on line. use of substandard concrete piles.

16. Damaged cut-off concrete piles was noted. 16. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to repair the damaged piles in accordance with
the approved plans.

17. Exposed deformed reinforcing steelbars of 17. Require the Contractor, to undertake
precast concrete piles do not conform to the corrective measures to attain the required 40 bar
40 bar diameter length as required to splicing. diameter length for splicing.

B. SLAB

1. Expansion joints of concrete slabs were not 1. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
provided with the required joint filler. provide the required expansion joint filler.

BREAKWATER AND CAUSEWAY

1. Inferior quality and undersized armour rocks 1. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
were used for causeway and breakwater. remove and replace the inferior/undersized
armour rocks at causeway in order to conform
with the approved plans and specifications.

2. Big gaps or voids between the rocks were 2. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
noted due to improper laying of rocks on to redo the section with noted deficiencies in
breakwater. order to conform with the approved plans and
specifications.

3. Transverse cracks were observed on 3. Require the Contracto, at his own expense, to
concrete pavement on the causeway. to seal with epoxy cement the transverse cracks
on concrete pavement on the causeway.

4. Uncompacted embankment materials on 4. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to

causeway was noted. compact the embankment materials to the
required density.

5. Cracks with settlement was noted on the 5. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
concrete pavement on the causeway. redo the defective section of concrete pavement
of the causeway.
6. Deficient length and width of the completed
breakwater was observed.
7. Deficient length and width of the completed
concrete pavement of the causeaway was
noted.
D. MATERIALS
1. Inferior quality of aggregates being use in
concreting works were observed.
2. Oversized/undersized aggregates being used
in concreting works were observed.
3. Use of undersized reinforcing steel bars was
noted.
4. Deficiency in the required number of steel
bars was noted.
5. Improper spacing of rebars was noted.
6. Installed rebars was rusty.
7. No quality test for rebars was noted.
8. Use of different brands of cement for
concreting works was noted.
9. Use of pozzolan cement instead of the
required portland cement in concreting works
was observed.
10. Concrete blocks with broken shear keys
were noted.
6. Deduct the amount equivalent to the deficiency
in width and length of the structure from the
payment of the contractor.
7. Deduct the amount equivalent to the deficiency
in length and width of the pavement from the
payment of the Contractor.
1. Require the Project Engineer to disallow the
use of inferior quality of aggregates for concreting
works.
2. Require the Contractor to reprocess the
aggregates in order to conform to the grading
requirements.
3. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
remove the undersized bars and replace it with
right size of bars conforming to conform with the
approved plans and secifications.
4. Require the Project Engineer to explain in
writing why the required number of steel bars
was not followed and require the contractor to
provide the required number of RSB to conform
with the plan.
5. Require the Project Engineer to observe
proper spacing of rebars.
6. Require the Contractor to steel brush the rusty
rebars prior to concreting.
7. Require the Project/Materials Engineer to
explain in writing why no tests were performed
on steel bars prior to use.
8. Require the Project/Materials Engineer to
explain in writing why different brands of cement
were allowed to be used in one concreting
operation.
9. Require the Project/Matrials Engineer to
explain in writing why pozzolan cements was
allowed to be used in concreting works.
10. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to replace the CHB with damaged shear keys.
E. OTHERS

1. No concrete vibrator was used during 1. Require the Contractor to use concrete
pouring of concrete. vibrator during pouring of concrete.

2. Use of concrete mix not conforming to the 2. Require the Project Engr./Materials Engr. to
design proportion. explain in writing why substandard concrete mix
was allowed in concreting works.

3. Concrete mix was too wet and does not 3. Require the Project Engr./Materials Engr. to
conform to the require consistency. explain in writing why too wet concrete mix was
allowed during pouring.

4. Installed mooring bits do not conform to the 4. Require the Conctractor, at his own expense,
plans and specifications. to remove and replace the substandard mooring
bits in order to conform with plans and
specifications.

VI. WATER SUPPLY PROJECTS

FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS

A. WATER QUALITY

1. No water quality test was made. 1. Require the Project Engr./Materials Engr. to
submit water sample for quality test to concerned
testing laboratories.

2. Well is not used by the end-users due to 2. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
poor quality of water. undertake remedial measures to make the well
usable.
B. WELL DEVELOPMENT

1. Poor location of the completed deepwell 1. Require the Project Engineer to explain in
was noted. writing why the deepwell was constructed at a
poor location.

2. Water is nt clear due to improper well 2. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
development. to undertake corrective measures on the
noted deficiency.

C. DRAINAGE PLATFORM

1. No drainage was observed. 1. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,

to provide drainage for the completed water
supply project.

D. CONCRETE PLATFORM

1. Crack was noted on concrete platform. 1. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to rework the concrete platform and base.

2. Poor quality of concrete was used for 2. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
platform and pedestal. to remove and replace the platform and pedestal
to conform to plans and specifications.

E. GUIDE POST AND HANDLE

1. Interior wooden pump handle was noted. 1. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to remove an drepalce the wooden pump handle
in order to conform to plans and specification.

2. Deficient length of wooden pump handle 2. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
was noted. to remove the wooden pump handle and replace
the same to conform with the approved plans
and specifications.

3. Deepwell not producing the required water 3. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
yield was noted. to institute corrective measures on the noted
deficiency.

4. Well is not functioning due to missing 4. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
accessories. to provide the missing deepwell accessories.

F. G. I. PIPES AND CASING

1. Water leak was observed on the pipes of 1. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
the distribution lines. to undertake, repair on the noted leaks on
pipes of distribution lines.

2. Size/diameter of the deepwell casing does 2. Require the Project Engineer to explain in
not conform to the requirements. writing why the size/diameter of the casing does
conforms to plans.
3. Deficiency in the number of pipes installed 3. Require the Project Engineer to explain in
was noted. writing why the required number of pipes were
not installed at the deepwell.

4. Installed G.I. pipes at the distribution lines 4. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
were noted to be deficient in length. to install the required number of pipes of the
distribution lines to conform to plans.

5. Pipes in the distribution lines were not 5. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
sufficiently backfilled with earth materials. to provide sufficient backfill materials on the
pipes of the distribution lines.

6. No drilling log, was maintained at the 6. Require the PE and ME to explain in writing
project site. why no drilling log was maintained at the project
site.

7. Cement grout was not provided on the 7. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
sides of the pipe casing of the deepwell. to provide the required cement, grout on the
sides of pipe casing of the deepwell in order
to conform to plans and specifications.

G. TANKS

1. Water tank does not conform to the 1. Require the Project Engineer to explain in
required dimension. writing why the dimension of the water tank does
not conform to the plans.

2. Cracks on concrete wall of the water tank 2. Requie the Contractor, at his own expense, to
was noted. to apply concrete epoxy on the noted cracks of
the water tank.

3. Undersized reinforcing steel bars were 3. Require the Project Engineer & Materials
noted used for the water tank. Engineer to explain in writing why undersized
RSB was allowed to be used in the project.

4. Reinforcing steel bars were noted to be 4. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
rusty and not properly tied. to steel brush the rusty steel bars and provide
sufficient tie wires prior to concreting.

5. Exterior and interior walls of R.C. water 5. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
tank were not sufficiently plastered with provide sufficient plaster on the walls of water
cement. tank.

6. Clogged inlet pipes of the water tank at the 6. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
source preventing the continuous flow of water undertake remedial measures to declogged the
in the tank. inlet pipes to permit the continuous flow of water
in the tank.

7. No quality tests on reinforcing steel bars, 7. Require the PE and ME to explain in writing
concrete and other materials use in the why no quality tests have been done on the
concreting of the water tank. materials prior to their incorporation to the work.

8. Concrete mix was not properly consolidated 8. Require the Contractor to provide concrete
during pouring of concrete for the walls of the vibrator for proper consolidation of concrete.
water tank.

9. Oversized coarse aggregates and dirty fine 9. Require the Contractor to process the
aggregates was noted in concreting works. aggregates in order to conform to the required
specifications.

10. Proportioning of concrete mix used for 10. Require the Project Engineer and Materials
R.C. water tank does not conform to the Engineer to explain in writing why substandard
required design mix. concrete mix was allowed in concreting works.

11. Honeycombs were observed on concrete 11. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
walls and base of the R.C. water tank. to plaster with cement mortar all honeycombs
noted on walls and base of the water tank.

12. Pozzolan cement was used in concreting 12. Require the PE and ME to explain in writing
works of R.C. water tank. why pozzolan cement was allowed to be used in
the concreting works of R.C. water tank.

FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS

Asphalt Pavement

1. Deduct the amount equivalent to the volume of

sub-base/base course materials not incorporated
into the project form the payment of contractor.
NOTE:
If sub-base/base is considered unnecessary due
to stronger subgrade, then the recommendation is
acceptable. If not, then it is required to introduce
sub-base/base course design.

2. Deduct the amount equivalent to the deficiency

in thickness of the aggregates sub-base/base
course materials form the payment of the
contractor.

FINDINGS
6. Incomplete tests made on item 200/201.
Aggregate sub-base/base course.
7. Item 200/201 on stockpiles contains
oversized aggregates.
A.2 PCCP
1. Major scaling was notes on the following
blocks: Left Lane: Block Nos. 5,6… Right
Lane:
2. Minor scaling was noted on the following
blocks: Left Lane: Block Nos. 5,6… Right
Lane:
3. Transverse cracks was noted on the
following blocks: Block Nos. 5,6…
Right Lane:
4. Transverse cracks and settlement was noted
NOTE:
If the deficient in thickness is considered
unnecessary due to stronger subgrade, then the
recommendation is acceptable. If not, then it is
required to comply the thickness requirement.
3. Require the Contractor to remove and replace
the inferior quality sub-base/base materials to
conform with the approved plans and
specifications.
4. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
redo the compaction of the sub-base/base course
by scarifying and mixing with water if necessary to
achieve optimum moisture content.
5. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
institute immediate corrective measures to prevent
further damage.
RECOMMENDATIONS
6. Require the Materials Engineer to implement
strictly the minimum testing requirement for
construction mateirals.
7. Require the Contractor to remove or hand
pick all oversized aggregates prior and during
spreading and compaction operations.
1. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
redo/remove and replace the pavement blocks
with major scaling. Also, investigate and submit a
report as to the possible causes for the defect to
ensure that replacement work will be properly
executed and effectively serve the purpose.
2. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
apply epoxy mortar on all pavement blocks with
minor scaling. Require the implementing office to
monitor the defective areas and if further
deterioration occurs within the warranty period,
redo/remove and replace the affected areas,
likewise, at the contractor's own expense.
3. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
seal with epoxy the pavement blocks with
transverse cracks.
4. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
on the following blocks: Block Nos. 5,6 …
Right Lane:
FINDINGS
5. Longitudinal cracks was noted on the
following blocks: Block Nos. 5,6… Right
Lane:
6. Honeycombs were observed on the
exposed side section of the concrete
pavement.
7. The pavement is deficient in width and on
length.
8. Non-provision of asphalt sealant in
longitudinal and weakened plane joints.
9. No concrete vibrator was used during
paving.
10. Partial billing was made even without the
required test reports on beam samples as
basis for payment.
FINDINGS
11. No curing was done on newly poured
concrete.
12. The size and type of dowel bars used don’t
conform to specifications.
redo/remove and replace the pavement blocks
with transverse cracks and settlement.
RECOMMENDATIONS
5. Require the Contractor to investigate the
reason for the longitudinal cracks. In case the
cause is poor subgrade, then this must be replace
with suitable granular material prior to concreting,
at his own expense, to redo/remove and replace
the pavement with longgitudinal cracks.
6. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
cutback and remove all honeycomb/voided con-
crete or to plaster the noted honeycombs with
cement paste.
7. Deduct the amount equivalent to the noted
deficiencies in dimensions from the payment of
the contractor to reconstruct to full specified
dimensions if this essential.
8. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to provide the longitudinal and weakened plane
joints with the necessary asphalt sealant.
9. Require the contractor to provide concrete
vibrator during concrete paving.
10. Require the Project/Materials Engineer to
explain in writing why partial paymet was allowed
in the project even on beam samples. Undertake
core test to determine if concrete strength is
acceptable.
RECOMMENDATIONS
11. Require the Contractor to observe proper
curing of concrete.
12. Require the Project Engineer to explain in
writing why dowel bars not conforming to the
 requirements were used in the project.

13. No beam samples taken during concreting 13. Require the Project Engineer to adhere to
operation. proper materials and construction quality control.

14. Peeling-off asphalt sealant on weakened 14. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
plane joints. to provide sufficient asphalt sealant on weakened
plane joints.

15. Concrete beam samples failed to meet the 15. Conduct core boring test to check the actual
minimum flexural strength requirements. strength of the concrete in place.

16. Chipping of edges were noted at the 16. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
exposed sides of the concrete pavement. to patch the chipped edge of the pavement and
provide road shoulders to prevent further
chippings.

COMMENDATION:

1. Workmanship of the concrete pavement

wa generally good and no defect has been
noted at the time of inspection.

2. No defects/deficiencies were noted on the

newly completed concrete pavement at the
time of inspection.

3. Blocking was consistent at 4.5 meter.

4. Weakened plane joints were provided with

sufficient asphalt sealant

FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS

5. The width and thickness of concrete

pavement as measured conform with the plans.

6. Materials incorporated in the project as

attested by the test results presented
satisfactorily meet the standard specifications.

A.3 Asphalt Pavement

1. Ravelling and depressions of the asphalt 1. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
pavement due to base failure were observed. remove and replace the damaged portion of the
asphalt pavement and to reconstruct the base to
conform with the plans.

2. Rough surface finish was observed on the 2. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
completed pavement. institute corrective measures on the rough surface.

3. Depressions were observed on intermittent 3. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
section of the completed pavement. rework the sections with depressions.
4. Ravelling were observed on some portion of 4. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
the completed pavement. rework the sections with ravelling.

5. Alligator cracks were noted at intermittent 5. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
sections. redo the road sections with alligator cracks.

6. Bleeding, depressions, major ravelling, 6. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
potholes and alligator cracks. redo/remove and replace the sections with noted
defects.

7. Severe longitudinal cracks were observe on 7. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
some section of the completed pavement. remove and replace the section with serve
longitudinal cracks.

FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS

8. No tests were made on asphalt mix for 8. Require the Project/Materials Engineer to
bitumen and aggregate bitumen contents prior adhere the proper materials and construction
to use in project. quality control.

9. Innadequate rescaling of the asphalt 9. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
pavement was noted. (MBC) rework the rescaling of the asphalt pavement.

10. Aggregates of item 310, Bituminous 10. Monitor the performance of the project and
concrete surface course can be easily peeled if deterioration/damages occur within the
off maybe due to insufficient compaction. warranty period require the contractor to repair
the deficiencies at his own expense.

11. Average thickness of the overlay is only 11. Require the Contractor to re-overlay the
2.5 centimeters and not 3.18 centimeters as pavement to meet the required thickness.
per approved plans.

12. Longitudinal cracks near the pavement 12. Require the Contractor to institute remedial
edge due to lack of lateral support were noted. measures on the noted defects.

13. Severe asphalt pavement failure were 13. Require the Contractor, to remove and
already observed on almost the entire half replace all defective and deteriorated sections at
stretch of the project. his own expense.

A.4 Road Shoulder

1. Insufficient and uncompacted shouldering 1. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
materials were noted. provide sufficient shouldering materials and redo
the compaction to conform to the required
density.

2. Shoulders were deficient in width and 2. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
thickness. reconstruct the shoulders to conform with the
approved plan.
FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS

3. Chipping of edges were noted at the 3. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
exposed sides of the concrete pavement due to patch the chipped edge of the pavement and
unconcstructed shoulders. provide road shoulders to prevent chippings.

4. Insufficient compaction and varying width of 4. Require the Contractor to reshape and
the shoulders. compact thoroughly the road shouldes.

5. Shoulders on both sides of the road 5. Require the Contractor to remove and replace
contained oversized materials. oversized materials to conform with the approved
plans and specifications.

6. Shoulder width on both sides of the entire 6. Deduct from the 10% retention of the
length was measured to be only one (1) meter Contractor the equivalent cost of the deficiency in
instead of one and one half (1½) meters as the width of the shoulders.
called for in the plan.

7. Unleveled shoulder was noted. 7. Require the Contractor to provide additional

shouldering materials to conform with the
requirements and compact same accordingly.

8. Unfinished construction of shoulder. 8. Require the Contractor to complete the

construction of shoulders.

9. Erosion and scouring of shoulders was 9. Instruct the Contractor to properly compact
noted. said materials as called for in the approved plans
and specifications.

10. Shoulder contain excessive amount of 10. Reprocess the shouldering materials to
highly plastic materials. conform with the specifications.

*Roadway Crown/Ditch

1. No side ditch was provided. 1. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
provide the necessary side ditch to conform with
the plans.

FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS

8. Inadequate mortar collaring of R.C. pipes. 8. Require the Contractor to correct collaring
works on R.C. pipes at his own expense.

9. Clogged inlet and outlet of the drainage 9. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
structure were noted. declog the drainage structure.

10. No collar mortar wa observed on all 10. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
RCCP structures. to provide all the RCCP structures with collar
mortar.
11. Cracks were noted on one of the exterior 11. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
RCCP structures. to seal all cracks with epoxy mortar.

12. Cracks were noted on inlet and outlet head 12. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
walls and apron. to institute corrective action on the noted cracks
on head walls and apron.

13. Massive cracks were observed on inlet 13. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
head walls. to redo the head walls and apron.

B.2 Grouted Riprap, Stone Masonry,

Concrete Rubble and Line Canal

1. Insufficient concrete mix/mortar in between 1. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
spaces for Rubble concrete masonry. provide sufficient mortar in between spaces of
rubble concrete masonry.

2. Clogged/silted lined canal. 2. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to

declog/desilt the lined canal.

3. Damaged/collapsed portion of grouted 3. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to

riprap. redo the damaged/collapsed section.

FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS

4. Improper slope construction of CHB 4. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
lined canal. to redo the section with improper slope
construction.

5. Vertical bars of lined canal were not extended 5. Require the Contracot, at his own expense,
up to its key. to institute remedial measures on the noted
deficiency to conform with the plans

6. Boulders/stones used in stone masonry 6. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
headwall do not conform with the specifications. to reconstruct the stone masonry headwall to
conform with the specifications.

7. Insufficient backfill materials for item 504, 7. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
Grouted Riprap. to provide the required volume of backfill
materials for item 504.

8. No foundation for grouted riprap. 8. Require the Constractor, at his own expense,
to reconstruct the grouted riprap to conform
with approved plans and specifications.

9. Use of poor quality concrete hallow on 9. Require the Material Engineer to observe
lined canal. proper materials quality control implementation.
II. SCHOOL BUILDING

FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS

A. Foundation, Flooring Structure and Stairs.

1. Deficient of thickness of on fill was noted. 1. Require the Project/Materials Engineers

to explain in writing why the defects/deficiencies
occurred despite their presence in the projects.
Deduct payment due to the Contractor the
amount equivalent to the thickness deficiency of
the slab.

2. Last step of the stair was not levelled with 2. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
the second floor slab elevation. correct the last step of stairs to conform with
second slab elevation.

3. Cracks were noted on cement toppings 3. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
of the concrete slab. rework the cement topping of the concrete slab
with cranks.

4. Honeycombs on the bottom slab of the 4. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
second floor were noted. to plaster the noted honeycombs with cement
mortar.

5. Protuding rebars of beam intended for 5. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
future expansion was not painted with red/ to paint the protuding beam rebars with red/lead
lead oxide for rust protection. oxide.

6. Spacing of reinforcement was not in 6. Deduct the amount equivalent to unused bars
accordance with the approved plans and due to the deviation from spacing requirements
specifications. from the payment of the contractor.

7. Inadequate steel floor drain and strainer 7. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
was installed. to provide the required floor drain as per plan.

FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS
8. Defective concrete flooring covered with
mortar topping was observed.
B. Column, Wall, Window and Door
1. Concrete hollow blocks of inferior quality
were used in the masonry work for walling.
2. Bolts were not provided on metal straps
connecting truss and column.
3. Baseboard was not provided on partitions
of the completed school building.
4. Insufficient nails were provided to partitions.
5. Splits, knots and decay on some jalousie
blades nad window jambs were observed.
6. cracks on the partitions of the newly
constructed stage.
7. Schedule of doors and window (grills) were
not followed, hence, quantities as per
approved program of work were overstated.
FINDINGS
8. Column dimensions measured were not
in accordance with approved plans.
9.The sixteen-meter span of 4"CHB walling
was constructed wihtout any column/stiffener.
10. Cracks were prevalent on the exterior
and interior CHB.
8. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to rework the defective concrete flooring with
mortar toppings to conform with the approved
plan.
1. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to remove the CHB used for walling and replace
it with right material conforming to the approved
specifications.
2. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to provide bolts on all metal straps.
3. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to provide baseboard on all partitions.
4. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to provide additional nails for partitions.
5. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to remove and replace all defective jalousie
blades and window jambs.
6. Require the Contrctor, at his own expense,
to seal all cracks noted on the partitions of the
newly constructed stage with epoxy.
7. Deduct payment due to the Contractor the
equivalent to the defieciency noted.
RECOMMENDATIONS
8. Deduct the cost corresponding to the
deficiency in volume of column from the final
payment of the Contractor.
9. Require the Section Chief of Planning and
Design to explain in writing why the sixteen-
meter span of 4"CHB walling was designed
without column/stiffener.
10. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to seal the cracks with concrete epoxy. Monitor
the corrective actions taken, and if further
deterioration occurs, within warranty period,
require the Contractor to remove and replace the
affected walls, likewise, at his own expense.
11. Hairline cracks on walls.
11. Monitor the hairline cracks within the war-
ranty period and if the cracks widen, apply
epoxy concrete on the noted defects.

12. Insufficient putty applied on glass window. 12. Require the Contrator, at his own expense,
to provide sufficient putty on glass window.

13. Laid bricks at the outside walls of the 13. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
building were not properly aligned. to rework the laid bricks at the outside wall of
the building to conform with the correct alignment.

14. Plastering works on columns and beams 14. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
was observed to bulge at least 0.5cm form to rework the plastering of columns and beams.
the edges.

FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS

15. Rusty window steel casement was 15. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
observed. to remove the rust on the window steel casement
prior to paint application.

16. Insufficient paint on end wall. 16. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to provide sufficient painting on end walls of the
building with better qaulity paints.

17. Rough/unsanded wooden jalousie blades 17. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
was observed. to remove and replace rough/unsanded wooden
jalousie blades with smooth finished wooden
blades.

18. Peeling-off paint finish was observed on 18. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
the completed schoolbuilding. to repaint portion of the Completed building
that peeled-off.

19. Non-provision of wooden baseboard on 19. Require the Contractor at his own expense,
the completed schoolbuilding. to provide wooden baseboard on the partitions
of the completed schoolbuilding.

20. Major honeycombs on all parts of beam 20. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
and columns causing the reinforcing steel to plaster/patch the major honeycombs on beams
bars to expose. and columns.

21. Four (4) mm thcik plywood was used as 21. Deduct form payment due to the contractor
partitions instead of 6mm thickness as required the price diffference between 4mm and 6mm
thick plywood.

22. Spacing of vertical RSB was not in 22. Deduct from payment due to the contractor
accordance with required 0.66mm. the amount corresponding to the vertical RSB
which were not incorporated into the work.

FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS

23. Some blades of the wooden jalousie were 23.Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
slightly deformed. to remove and replace the slightly damaged
wooden jalousie blades.

24. Concrete pouring was done on beams and 24. Require the Project/Materials Engineer to
columns without the presence of the Project/ explain in writing why pouring of concrete on
Materials Engineer. column and beams were not closely supervised.

C. Roof and Roof Framing

1. Gusset place connecting the top and bottom 1. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
chords of steel trusses were spot welded provide the required 4.75 mm fillet weld on all
instead of providing the 4.75 mm fillet weld as steel truss connections to conform with the
called for the plan. approved plans and specifications.

2. Concrete for Roof beams, girders and slabs 2. Require the Chief of Planning and Design
were not poured monolithically. Section to assess the stability of the structure and
recommend/submit appropriate scheme of
correction prior to the actual work.

3. Deviation were noted of the schedule of 3. Require the concerned Project Engineer to
reinforcement for the consctruction of roof observe correct arrangement of steel
beams. reinforcement for roof beams to conform with the
approved plan and specifications.

4. Use of 3/16" thick plywood for ceiling 4. Deduct from payment due to the contractor the
instead of ¼" thick required in the approved amount equivalent to the thickness deficiency of
program of work. the plywood actually used in the project.

5. Deficient in size of top chord was noted. 5. Deduct the amount corresponding to the cost
difference between the actual and the required
sizes of top chords used from final payment due
to the contractor.

FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS

6. Inadequate machine bolts were noted on the 6. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
trusses. provide additional machine bolts on the trusses.

7. Spacing of purlins were not constructed as 7. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
per approved plan. redo the purlins to the required spacing to
 conform with plans and specifications.

8. Rusts were noted on the unpainted roofing 8. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
steel members. brush off the rusts on roofing steel members prior
to painting.

9. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to

9. Plywood on the ceiling were observed to remove and replace the plywood on the ceiling
have boreholes with boreholes.

10. Ceiling was already installed without the 10. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
necessary tension rods on all trusses, to provide the tension road on all to conform with
plan.

11. Only 1-½ corrugated side lapping was 11. Require the Project Engineer to observe
used for G.I. roofing sheet instead of the 2-½ standard 2-½ corrugations side lapping for G.I.
corrugations requirements. roofing sheets.

12. No wood cleats were provided on the 12. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
installed purlins. to provide wood cleats on the installed purlins.

13. Non-provision of G.I. end flashing on 13. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
roofing. to provide plain G.I. end flashing on roofing.

14. Warping of fascia board was observed. 14. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to remove and replace the warped facia board.

FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS

15. insufficient angle bars for trusses. 15. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to provide the required number of angle bars for
trusses to conform with the approved plans.

16. Undersized fascia boards were installed. 16. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to remove and replace the undersized fascia
board installed to conform with the plan.

17. Undersized plywood was used in the 17. Deduct from payment due to the contractor
construction of ceiling. the amount equivalent to the price difference
between the specified and undersized plywood.

D. Fixture and Others

1. The project has already uncurred a negative 1. Require the Project Engineer to explain in
slippage. writing why no calibrated action was taken on the
negative slippage per D.O. 102, series of 1998

2. Lavatory fixtures and other plumbing 2. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
appurtenances were not intalled. provide the lavatory fixtures and plumbing

3. Damaged tiles were observed on the sink
and lavatory of the newly completed comfort
room.
4. Pozzolan cement type "P" instead of
Portland cement used in the concreting works.
III WATER SUPPLY
FINDINGS
1. Construction Method and Materials Quality
1.1.1 Four (4) were observed lacking at the
flange and pedestral connection.
1.1.2 No bacteriological test was conducted
on the water prior to opening for public
use.
1.1.3 Drainage for waste water was not
provided in the construction of concrete
platform.
1.1.4 Bacteriological examination revealed +5
Enterobacteria presence in water.
1.1.5 Nuts were missing at the yoke assembly
and four (4) bolts were not incorporated
on the flange and pedestral connection.
1.1.6 One (1) of the deep wells was construct-
ed with improper drainage.
1.1.7 Water from the deep well is not recom-
mended for drinking nor washing, due to
the presence of sand particles and other
impurities.
appurtenances to conform with the approved
plan.
3. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
remove the damaged tiles on the sink and lavatory
and replace with new one.
4. Require the Project Engineer to explain in
writing why pozzolan cement type "P" was
allowed to be used in concreting works.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1.1.1 Require the Project Engineer to replace the
lacking bolts at the flange and pedestral
connection.
1.1.2 Require the Project Engineer to request
from the DOH office for bacteriological of
the water.
1.1.3 Require the Contractor to provide
appropriate drainage system.
1.1.4 Require the Project Engineer to request
DOH to conduct chlorination/disinfections
of the well.
1.1.5 Require the Contractor to incorporated all
lacking bolts and nuts into the project.
1.1.6 Construct proper drainage to prevent
seepage of unclean water into the well.
1.1.7 Require the Project Engineer to fully
develop the well prior to pump set
installation and make the necessary
drainage in order to drain stagnant water,
and to conduct water quality and
bacteriological analysis test, prior to
opening of the well.
 FINDINGS
1.1.8 The project was abandoned with its pip-
es and other accessories not retrieved.
1.1.9 Per information from the Project Engine-
er, said well was transferred to another
location within the barangay but the exa-
ct location could not be ascertained.
1.1.10 Deficiency in dimension of the intake t-
ank. Actual dimension are 2.02m x
2.02m instead of 2.70 m x 2.70 m as
per approved plan.
1.1.11 Gate valve for the intake tank was not
provided
FINDINGS
5. Materials incorporated into the project were
not tested prior to use.
6. Concrete drainage and catch basin of the s-
chool building were not constructed.
7. Edges at the security grill openings were not
RECOMMENDATIONS
1.1.8 Require the Project Engineer to explain the
reason for abandoned of the well.
1.1.9 Require the Project Engineer to submit the
location of the new site where the well was
transferred. He should likewise explain why
he could not ascertain the exact location of
his claim that the Contractor transferred the
deep well to another site within the barang-
ay.
1.1.10 Require the Project Engineer to prepare
an as-built plan which will be the basis of
payment for the Contractor.
1.1.11 Require the Contractor to install the gate
valve per plans and specification.
RECOMMENDATIONS
5. Require the Project Engineer/Materials Engin-
eer to explain in writing why the materials not
tested were used in the project.
6. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
construct the required concrete drainage and
catch basin of the school building to conform
with the approved plan.
7. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
 properly shaped.
8. The installed water closet was not of the re-
quired type or brand.
FINDINGS/OBSERVATIONS
ROADS
CONCRETE/ASPHALT ROADS
A.1. SUB-BASE
1.1 Deficient thickness of aggregate subbase
course materials were provided.
1.2 Oversized Item 200 materials were noted.
A.2 BASE COURSE
2.1 Deficient thickness of aggregate base
course materials were provided.
2.2 Oversized item 201 materials were noted.
reshape the edges of the security grill openings
properly.
8. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
remove installed water closet and replace it w-
ith material conforming to the approved specif-
ications.
AUTHORIZED CORRECTION
1.1 a. With PCCP/wearing course:
Tolerance:0-20 mm.
- within tolerance, full payment
- outside tolerance, no payment
b. Without PCCP/wearing course:
- redo subbase construction
1.2 a. With PCCP/wearing course:
- Require the concerned PE to explain
in writing why he allowed the
incorporation of oversized materials on
in-placed Item 200.
b. Without PCCP/wearing course:
- Remove and reprocess materials
from stockpile, shoulder or in-placed
Item 200 materials.
2.1 a. With PCCP/wearing course:
Tolerance 0-100 mm
- within tolerance, full payment
- outside tolerance, no payment
b. Without PCCP/wearing course:
- Redo base construction
2.2 a. With PCCP/wearing course:
- Require the concerned PE to explain in
in writing why he allowed the

FINDINGS/OBSERVATIONS
A.3 PCCP
3.1 Minor scaling on completed concrete
pavement was observed.
3.2 Transverse cracks occuring at middle
third of pavement block were noted on the
completed concrete pavement.
3.3 Transverse crack occuring within 1.5m
from the weakened plane joints
was noted.
3.4 Longitudinal cracks on completed
concrete pavement was noted.
3.5 Criss-cross/diagonal/
restraint cracks on concrete pavement
were noted.
incorporation of oversized materials on
in-placed Item 201.
b. Without PCCP/wearing course:
- Remove and reprocess materials
from stockpile, shoulder or in-placed
Item 201 materials.
AUTHORIZED CORRECTION
3.1 -Minor scaling is defined when the
depth of exposed pavement surface is
less than 5.0mm.
- Major scaling is when depth of
exposed pavement surface is 5.0mm.
above. Conduct coring on affected
blocks and subject samples to strength
determination. If samples pass, leave
as is; if samples fail, remove and
replace all affected blocks.
3.2 Require the Conctractor, at his own
expense, to seal the transverse
cracks with concrete epoxy.
3.3 Remove and replace 1/3 of the
pavement block and provide dowel
bars at weakened plane joints and tie
bars at the construction joints.
3.4 Require the Contractor, at his own
expense, to remove and replace the
pavement area affected with
longitudinal cracks.
3.5 If it is like a temperature crack, leave
as is, otherwise, conduct core boring
test for strength determination.
- If samples pass, seal the crack with
asphalt sealant.
- If samples fail, remove and replace
the affected area.
Provide the necessary dowel/tie bars.
3.6 Corner cracks on concrete pavement
were noted.
FINDINGS
2. Undefined side ditches and roadway
B. Flood Control Structures
B.1 R.C. Pipes
1. RCPC structures was found to be
misaligned.
2. Installed RCPC do no tongue and
groove ends.
3. Inadequate mortar flushing inside
the RCPC joints.
4. Diameter of RCPC was not in
accordance with the approved
plans.
5. Installed R.C. pipes were lower
than the outlet elevation.
6. Insufficient/no collaring on R.C.
pipes.
7. No foundation fill was placed on
the installed R.C. pipes.
3.6 - If crack opening is 1-2mm, seal
crack with asphalt sealant.
- If crack opening exceeds 2mm,
remove and replace 1/3 or whole block
as the case maybe, providing the
necessary dowel/ tie bars at the
contractor's own expense.
RECOMMENDATIONS
2. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
provide the necessary side ditches and proper
crowning to conform with the specifications.
1. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
redo the misaligned RCPC structures.
2. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
remove the installed RCPC without the requir-
ed tongue and groove and replace with accep-
table materials.
3. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
provide sufficient mortar flushing at joints.
4. Deduct from payment due the
contractor the amount equivalent
to the undersized RCPC used in
the project.
5. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
network the portion where the pipes were
properly installed.
6. Require the Contractor, at his own expense, to
provide sufficient mortar for collaring of R.C.
pipes.
7. Require the Contractor to remove
and rework the installed culvert
pipes and incorporate the foundation fill.
FINDINGS/OBSERVATIONS
3.7 Temperature/ hairline cracks were noted
on the concrete pavement.
3.8 Improper brooming was noted on the
completed concrete pavement.
3.9 Substandard dowel bars were used on
concrete pavement.
3.10 No concrete beam samples were taken
during concreting operation.
3.11 Improper construction of weakened
plane joints of concrete pavement was
noted.
3.12 Inadequate number of dowel bars was
noted.
3.13 Big/small pockmarks were noted at
intermittent sections of the concrete
pavement
AUTHORIZED CORRECTION
3.7 - If the temperature/hairline cracks were
isolated ones, leaves as is. If cracks
were in series condition conduct core
boring test for strength determination.
- If samples pass, leaves as is; If
samples fail remove and replace the
affected area providing the necessary
dowel/tie bars.
3.8 Require the Project Engineer to observe
proper finishing of concrete in
succedding projects.
3.9 Require the concerened Project
Engineer to explain in writing why
substandard dowel bars were used in
the project.
3.10 Conduct core boring test for strength
determination:
- If samples pass, leaves as is.
- If samples fail, remove and replace
the affected area/block.
3.11 - For shallow weakened plane joints,
recut to the required depth using
concrete saw.
For too wide joints, seal with asphalt
sealant.
3.12 Provide additional dowel bars.
3.13 - If pockmarks are more than 1" in
diameter, seal/patch with epoxy mortar.
- If less than 1" diameter, leaves as is.
3.14 Crossfall was not provided on the
completed pavement.
3.15 Improper placing of tie bars on the
longitudinal joints was observed.
FINDINGS/OBSERVATIONS
3.16 Chippings of edges, due to unconstruc-
ted shoulders were noted at the expos-
ed side of the concrete pavement.
3.17 Mortar topping was noted on concrete
pavement
3.18 Animal footmarks were note on the
concrete pavement
3.19 Groove/tongue was not continuously
constructed to serve as key for the
longitudinal joints of the completed
pavement.
3.20 Installed tie bars were place above the
groove of the longitudinal key joint of
the concrete pavement.
3.21 Scratches were noted on the surface of
the complete PCCP.
3.22 Misaligned outer edge of the PCCP
was noted due to improper use of
forms during paving works.
A.4 ASPHALT PAVEMENT
4.1 Per test results, the density of asphalt
core samples are 95 to 97% lower than
3.14 Require the Project Engineer to explain
in writing why the required slope was
not provided on the completed
pavement.
3.15 If tie bars were placed outside middle
third of longitudinal edge, provide tie
bars at proper location by drilling.
AUTHORIZED CORRECTION
3.16 Require the Contractor, at his own
expense, to repair chipped edges
with epoxy mortar.
3.17 Conduct core boring test for strength
determination:
- If samples pass, leaves as is.
- If samples fail, remove and replace
the affected area/block.
3.18 Require the Contractor, at his own
expense, to seal all animal footmarks
with epoxy mortar.
3.19 Construct the missing groove/tongue
as the case maybe, to serve as key for
the longitudinal joints.
3.20 If tie bars were placed outside middle
third of longitudinal edge, provide tie
bars at proper location by drilling.
3.21 Define the width and depth of
scratches:
- If the width and depth of scratches
are more than 1.0cm., seal with epoxy
mortar.
- If less than 1.0cm., leaves as is.
3.22 Deduct the cost for steel forms.
4.1 If the density is more than the required
tolerance, remove and replace the
 the specified designed requirement.
4.2 Test results on asphalt core samples
taken showed that asphalt content was
higher/lower than the job mix formula.
FINDINGS/OBSERVATIONS
4.3 No quality test were made on asphalt
mix prior to its use in the project.
A.5 SOULDER
5.1 Shoudler base/subbase were not
constructed simultaneously with the
pavement base/subbase.
A.6 RELATED STRUCTURES
6.1 Insufficient grout was provided between
interstices of boulders for: a. grouted
riprap, b. stone masonry
6.2 Vertical bars grouted riprap lined canal
were not extended up to its key.
6.3 Installed RCCPs do not have the
required tongue and groove.
6.4 Cracks were noted on the installed
RCCPs.
6.5 Cracks were noted on inlet and outlet
affected area.
4.2 If the asphalt content is greater than
the tolerance, provide seal coating ( in
accordance with Item 303).
AUTHORIZED CORRECTION
4.3 Conduct core boring test and subject
the core samples taken for quality test:
- If samples pass, full payment
- If samples fail, remove and replace
the affected area.
5.1 - If on-going project, reconstruct the
shoulder base/subbase.
- If completed, require the concerned
Project Engineer, to explain in writing
why shoulders were not constructed
simultaneously with the base/subbase.
6.1 - If insufficient cement mortar grout
was not only on the surface of the
structure; provide additional cement
mortar grout.
- If insufficient cement mortar grout
was noted through and through; redo
the construction of the structure.
6.2 Redo the constructed grouted riprap
lined canal.
6.3 Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to remove and replace all installed RCCPs
required tongue and groove.
6.4 If the crack will not affect the structural
integrity of the pipe and it is less than
2mm, apply epoxy mortar otherwise,
remove and replace the PCCP with
crack.
6.5 Seal all cracks with pressurized
 head walls and apron.
FINDINGS/OBERVATIONS
BRIDGES
A. SUB-STRUCTURE
1. Plywood was used instea of the required
pre-molded joint filler from back wall
to girder joints.
B. APPROACHES
1. Minor scaling was observed on the bridge
appoaches.
2.a Defective concrete railings, wingwalls
and bridge sidewalk were observed with
cement plastering.
2.b Deficient in dimension.
C. SLOPE PROTECTION
1. Non-provision of weepholes on the slope
protectioN was observed.
2. The longest faces of the stone/boulder of
the grouted riprap were not place
perpendicular to the side slope.
3. Use of undersized rocks in riprapping
works was noted.
concrete epoxy.
AUTHORIZED CORRECTION
1. Require the concerned Project Engineer, to
explain in writing why he allowed the use of
plywood for the backwall to girder joints and
deduct payment due the contractor the
equivalent cost of the premolded joint filler
which was not incorporated into the works.
1. Conduct core boring test for strength
detemination:
- If samples pass, leaves as is.
- if samples fail, remove and replace
the affected area/block.
2.a Redo the cement plastering.
2.b Redo the constructed structure to
conform with the approved plan.
1. Require the Contractor, at his own
expense to provide weepholes on the
slope protection to conform with the
plans and specifications.
2. Require the Contractor, at his own
expense, to reconstruct the grouted
riprap to conform with the plans and
specifications.
3. Redo the section of the constructed
grouted riprap with undersized rocks.
D. SUPERSTRUCTURE
1. Honeycombs were noted on the bridge
diaphragm.
FINDINGS/OBERVATIONS
SCHOOL BUILDING
A. FOUNDATION, FLOORING, STRUCTURE AND STAIRS
1. Deficient thickness of the slab on fill was
noted.
2. Honeycombs were noted on the bottom
slab of second floor.
3. The spacing of reinforcement of beams/
columns/slabs was not in accordance
with the approved plans and
specifications.
FLOOD AND CONTROL AND DRAINAGE
A. RIPRAP AND STONE MASONRY
1. Insufficient mortar grout was noted on
riprapping works.
2. Weepholes were not provided on
grouted riprap.
1. - For minor honeycombs; patch with
cement mortar.
- For major honeycombs (with exposed
rebars); apply pressurized concrete
epoxy.
AUTHORIZED CORRECTION
1. a. For thickness more than 25mm deficinecy;
remove and replace the concrete slab to
conform with the specifications.
b. For thickness less than 25mm with other
defect such as cracks, remove and replace
the concrete slab.
c. For thickness less than 25mm without
other defect, deduction in payment.
2. For minor honeycombs, patch will cement
mortar. For major honeycombs (with
exposed rebars), apply pressurized conrete
epoxy.
3. - If it will affect the structural stability, redo
the spacing of the installed rebars/redo the
affected structure.
- If it will not affect the structural stability,
deduct payment due the contractor.
- If the project is still on-going, redo the
construction.
1. - For insufficient grout on facing, provide
additional cement mortar grout.
- For insufficient cement mortar grout, on
interstices of laid stones/boulders, redo the
grouted riprap to conform with the
specifications.
2. "Included already in the provisions for
Item 504. "
B. DAMS, SPILLWAYS, SPURDIKES, GABIONS AND REVETMENT WALL
1. The concrete bedding for the rubble
concrete revetment was deficient in
thickness.
FINDINGS/OBSERVATIONS
B. COLUMN, WALL, WINDOW, AND DOOR
1 . Actual column dimensions for school
building were not in accordance with the
approved plans.
2. Cracks were noted to be prevalent on
the exterior and interior CHB walls.
3. Honeycombs on columns were noted to
have exposed reinforcing steel bars.
4. Spacing of vertical RSB was not in
accordance with the required 0.60m.
5. One (1) concrete column of the
schoolbuilding was misaligned.
6. Bulging of concrete was observed on
column of the building.
C. ROOF AND ROOF FRAMING
1. The top chord was noted to be deficient
in dimensions
2. If the project is still on-going, redo the
concrete bedding.
AUTHORIZED CORRECTION
1. - If the project is still on-going, redo the
construction.
- If the defect will affect the structural
stability, redo the spacing and installed
rebars/redo the affected structure.
- If the defect will not affect the structural
stability, deduct payment due the contractor.
2. Redo the cement plastering.
3. Apply pressurized concrete epoxy on
affected columns.
4. If the project is still on-going, redo the
CHB wall.
5. Refer to BOD, for checking the
structural adequacy.
6. Require the Contractor, at his own expense,
to chip-off the bulging concrete on the
column and finish to conform with the
requirement.
1. Check structural adequacy:
- If adequate, deduct from the payment due
the contractor the amount equivalent to
price difference of the required and inplaced
materials.
- If inadequate, remove and replace the
defective top chord, at contactor's own
expense.
o the volume of
porated into the

of base materials

r quality of base
wn expense, to

menting Office to

wn expense, to

wn expense, to
ceeding projects.

quality control.
o conform with
rials to conform
 exploration was
casted piles driven

wn expense, to
s represented by

wn expense, to
2) leaning piers

lignment of the
dge approaches
rap with cracks
between spaces
f the reinforced
he total quantity

gap of 2.54cm.
per department
ding to conform
n the damaged
bion wire mesh.
gravel bedding.

wn expense, to

wn expense, to

ed number if piles

ot conform with

wn expense, to

en the straps of

wn expense, to
wn expense, to

wn expense, to

wn expense, to

wn expense, to

wn expense, to
o the deficiency

o the deficiency

es for concreting

wn expense, to

onform with the

brush the rusty

rands of cement
rd concrete mix

ncrete mix was

est to concerned

wn expense, to
ed at the project

water tank does

wn expense, to

wn expense, to

wn expense, to

us flow of water
on to the work.

o the volume of

ommendation is
ed to introduce

o the deficiency
wn expense, to

ter if necessary to

wn expense, to
asures to prevent

wn expense, to

ate and submit a

wn expense, to

menting office to

wn expense, to

wn expense, to
must be replace
or to concreting,

wn expense, to

met was allowed

 quality control.

nt on weakened

wn expense, to

wn expense, to
he rough surface.

wn expense, to
wn expense, to

wn expense, to

wn expense, to

wn expense, to

wn expense, to

wn expense, to
terials and redo

wn expense, to
wn expense, to

ith the approved

the deficiency in

approved plans

wn expense, to
o conform with

wn expense, to
wn expense, to

wn expense, to

wn expense, to
cts/deficiencies

s deficiency of

wn expense, to

wn expense, to

s with red/lead
 ng and replace
to the approved
correct alignment.

steel casement

nd walls of the

ombs on beams
wn expense, to

he structure and

onform with the

e contractor the

wn expense, to

wn expense, to
wn expense, to
l members prior

wn expense, to

to conform with

was taken on the

wn expense, to
wn expense, to
ink and lavatory
 r to explain the

re the well was

wise explain why

r transferred the
hin the barang-

Materials Engin-
e materials not

wn expense, to

wn expense, to
y grill openings

wn expense, to
nd replace it w-
approved specif-
wn expense, to

wn expense, to

wn expense, to
hout the requir-

wn expense, to

wn expense, to

wn expense, to