Creating a Precise Amount of Copper from a Reaction
Pre-Lab Questions: 1. What type of reaction is taking place between copper (II) sulfate and iron? See the “Types of Reactions” EdPuzzle. A single replacement reaction occurred in this lab because the iron replaced the copper in bonding with the sulfate molecule. This can be seen both the molecular and complete ionic equations shown below. Single replacement reactions occur when one element is being added to a (usually aqueous) compound made up of a similar element (in the metal/nonmetal capacity) and another molecule. The element being added, if a metal/cation, will replace the metal/cation in the compound. Similarly, the element being added, if a nonmetal/anion, will replace the nonmetal/anion in the compound.
2. Explain what is meant by the symbols (aq) and (s) in the chemical equations. As part of your explanation explain how the molecular equation and the complete ionic equation for this reaction are equivalent. In the following chemical equations, the letters in parentheses following the notation refers to the state of matter of the substance. The (aq) means that the particles have been dissolved in water, while the (s) means that the particles are in a solid state of matter. Molecular: F e (s) + C uSO 4(aq) → F eSO 4(aq) + C u (s) 2+ 2− 2+ 2− Complete Ionic: F e (s) + C u (aq) + S O 4(aq) → F e (aq) + S O 4(aq) + C u (s) These two equations are saying the same things, however the Complete Ionic equation is more specific about which particles are actually giving up electrons. In each, there are one particle of iron, one particle of copper, and one particle of sulfate on each side, so they are balanced. The main difference between the two equations is that the copper (II) sulfate and iron sulfate are split up in the complete ionic equation, but this is to show how the charges of each particle bring them together to form one neutrally charged molecule.
3. Is the molecular chemical equation balanced? Explain how you know. The molecular equation is balanced because on each side of the equation, there are the same number of types of particles. On the products side, there is one atom of iron, one ion of copper (II), and one sulfate ion, which in turn is made up of one sulfur atom, two oxygen atoms, and two oxygen ions. On the reactants side, there is one iron ion, one sulfate ion (same makeup of one sulfur atom, two oxygen atoms, and two oxygen ions), and one atom of copper. Since the charges cancel out and there are the same number of types of particles on each side, there are the same number of subatomic and atomic particles on each side.
4. Why is iron replacing/displacing copper to bond with the sulfate and create a new compound? Be as thorough as possible in your explanation. A good explanation will involve electrons. Single replacement reactions occur because the outside element is more reactive than it’s similar element within the compound. Conversely, if the element within the compound is more reactive than the element being added, a reaction will not occur.
Figure 1: Reactivity Series
The reactivity of any given element can be estimated by assessing how likely an element is to lose/gain electrons, but a reactivity series must be researched for a more accurate idea of how reactive an element is. For example, the reactivity series for cations can be seen on the left. Iron replaces copper because both are metals, and when the iron comes close to the copper sulfate, the copper can take electrons from the iron, making the iron positively charged and thus able to bond with the negatively charged sulfate.
image source
5. Calculate the amount of iron powder and copper (II) sulfate you will need to generate a theoretical yield of exactly 1.00 g of copper from the reaction.
1.00g Cu 1 mole Cu 1 mole Fe 55.85g = 0.894g Fe 1 63.65g 1 mole Cu 1 mole Fe
1.00g Cu 1 mole Cu 1 mole SO4 96.06g = 1.51g SO4 1 63.65g 1 mole Cu 1 mole SO4
1.51g SO4 + 1.00g Cu = 2 .51g CuSO4
6. Imagine that you have 5.00 g of Fe and excess (more than enough) CuSO4. Calculate the mass of copper you will recover as a product at the end of the reaction assuming that all of the iron reacts and you recover all the copper. This value is known as the theoretical yield. Because the reaction occurring between the two substances is a single replacement reaction, there will be exactly as much copper yielded as iron went in. Therefore, however many moles of iron put in to the solution will be how many moles of copper come out of the reaction. 5.00 g of iron placed in copper (II) sulfate will yield 5.69g copper.
5.00g Fe 1 mole Fe 1 mole Cu 63.546g Cu = 5.689g Cu 1 55.845g Fe 1 mole Fe 1 mole Cu
7. How is a chemical equation like a recipe? Why do chemists use calculations involving the mole and molar mass when measuring out the amounts of reactants used in a particular reaction? A chemical equation and a recipe have several things in common, such as ratios, different ingredients, and what needs to be done to the ingredients to make a specific product. Utilising units such as moles and molar mass to measure elements is very similar to units such as cups and tablespoons to measure flour or sugar. These units allow chemists and bakers alike to translate between different ingredients and elements when making their respective materials. Also, just like a chemical equation, the same ingredients that you put into a type of food will make up the food once it is finished, just in a different form.
Results Table 1: Mass and Moles of Materials used Material Mass (g) Moles Copper (II) Sulfate 3.516 0.022 Copper 1.400 0.022 Sulfate 2.116 0.022 Iron 1.229 0.022 140 mL beaker 82.95 n/a Tape .22 n/a
Table 2: Time of Measurement vs Total Mass and Mass of Cu Time Total Mass (g) Mass of Cu (g) Directly after heating 87.55 4.38 Steve's recording 84.55 1.38 Steve's recorded w/o tape 84.33 1.38
Post Lab Questions 1. What pieces of evidence do you have that a chemical reaction took place? Be thorough. There is ample evidence that a chemical reaction occured in this lab. For starters, heat was added to the water and CuSO4 solution to break bonds apart, which is the first step in a chemical reaction. Then, the iron was added in, also a necessary step because chemical reactions requires the mixing two or more substances. Finally, a new substance, copper, was created, which is the last step in the chemical reaction process.
2. Predict how the following scenarios would affect the amount of copper you believed you recovered from the experiment. In particular you should indicate whether the scenario would increase, decrease or not affect the amount of copper you believed you recovered. Provide a one or two sentence explanation of your reasoning. a. You don’t let the filter paper and filtrate completely dry before measuring their mass. This mistake would make one believe they recovered more copper than they actually did. Because the liquid did not evaporate and drain completely, the mass of the remaining liquid is also being measured with the mass of the copper.
b. You only rinse the filtrate once. This mistake would also increase the mass, because there might still be some pure iron that has not reacted mixed in with the copper. Also, FeSO4 weighs a lot more than water, so it will have a bigger impact on the mass if a little bit is left behind.
c. You let the reaction proceed for three minutes as opposed to the recommended ten. This mistake would decrease the amount of copper one thought they had recovered. By not letting the reaction complete fully, there will still be copper dissolved in the water that hasn’t been replaced by iron, and it will get washed away with the liquid when the filtrate is rinsed.
d. You use twice as much copper (II) sulfate to make the copper (II) sulfate solution This will not change the amount of copper that one thought they had recovered from the experiment. After all, you can only get (at maximum) as many moles of copper out as moles of iron put in, so the actual amount of copper you get out will be unchanged. However, putting in more copper sulfate than needed shouldn’t be done because it is wasteful.
3. Based on what you did in the lab, would you expect your final measurements to indicate that you recovered more or less than the theoretical yield of copper? You should answer this question before determining your actual yield. Explain your reasoning in the context of which sources of error and uncertainty you believe are most likely in YOUR experiment. I would expect our final measurements to show that we had recovered less than our theoretical yield (1.4g) because, other errors aside for a moment, we used only as much of each substance as we needed to be 100% efficient, and it is practically impossible to guarantee a complete and absolute reaction with every single molecule, and that every single atom of copper was retained in the decanting process. I am most concerned that our decanting method was sloppy and did not retain as much copper as possible. Because decanting was the last piece of the labs we had to do for the day, our group was not as on top of our game as we could have been. We visually saw that we lost a small amount of copper down the drain when rinsing the substance.
4. Calculate your percent yield of copper using the formula below. (1.38/1.4) * 100 = 98.57%
5. Does your percent yield support the claims you made in answer to question 3? Explain. This does support the claim that I made in question three that it we probably had recovered less than our theoretical yield. However, the amount we lost was less than I expected it to be due to the combination of factors I thought would affect the mass listed above.
6. Why should it be impossible to have a true percent yield greater than 100%? It is completely impossible to have a true percent yield greater than 100% because you simply cannot retrieve more copper than is replaced by iron. The higher reactivity of the iron is what causes the copper to be replaced, however when the iron is not combined with the copper sulfate, the copper cannot be displaced because there is nothing to break it’s bond with sulfate. Furthermore, if you have more iron than copper sulfate, you cannot retrieve more copper than is in the copper sulfate because copper is a pure element and cannot be manufactured (yet).