Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Miguel A. Cortez
Christopher Herrera
Running Head: What’s wrong with Vaccines 2
Introduction.
Time and science are two things that are closely related because the time never
stops, and that is the same case of science. With the pass of the time science have made
several discoveries that had changed society, in this case, the improvement that will be
discussed are the vaccines because nowadays most of the society knows what a vaccine
does or what is the purpose for this invention. The vaccine was invented in 1796 and was
created with the purpose to eradicate the smallpox disease, the scientist founded the cure
for this disease by an analysis in the blood of the cows that were related to the virus that
caused the disease. The Vaccines nowadays is known as a substance that contains dormant
or killed viruses that are injected to the humans with the purpose to help the immune
system to create antibodies that will prevent the body to get sick.
However are they really necessary for the body, this is a question that is being
circulated among the scientist because there were some cases where the people who got
some type of vaccine died after receiving the vaccine because the virus infected the people.
Within the paper, it will be analyzed an image and a video that fits into the Iconography
genre which almost all resources that come from the media such as Videos, posters,
cartoons, photography, corporate logo, etc.; The image and the video clearly convey the
disapproval of the vaccines which supports the main idea of the article. The analysis helps
to show what resources the creators of the image and the video used to convey a clear idea
The video that is being analyzed last 9:17 minutes and it is provided by a YouTube
channel called Scishow which is most known for videos that talk about scientific topics.
During the video, the audience can appreciate how he explains about the vaccines and why
the people are concerning about this and how the Anti-Vaccine movement has been
growing , the idea for making the video was to change the point of view about the vaccines
and try to let the audience know some of the consequences that the vaccines have. With the
image is something similar because it also provides some diseases that are consequences of
some vaccines, this type of images is to alert the people about the bad effects that the
vaccines have.
When anyone is porting a video an image, even a document the first thing that needs
to be analyzed as if it will have some effect and what it will be. In the case of the image and
the video it seems to express their opinion effectively because in the video the use of
animations help to catch the attention of the audience so they don’t get bored with a video,
if the video provides a lot of information the people will not wait till the end because it is
too much information and they will not catch the idea of the video. The video uses the help
of cartoons to give a clearer idea of what the presenter is talking about and define more the
topic, it also uses some animations to highlights the things the audience should focus on,
some soundtrack help also to catch the audience attention and don’t make the video boring.
In the case of the image it is also effective because it goes directly to the point by showing
some diseases that occur as a consequence of the vaccines, also the use of the color red to
highlight their idea makes it easy to the audience catch what is the author point of view.
Running Head: What’s wrong with Vaccines 4
In both cases, the intended audience is young adults such as college students and
adults that will be interested in the topic and will find some relevance in the information
that the video and the image are providing and increase the desire of the audience to learn
more about the concerns of the topic. Everything that is posted on the media or documents
related to some topic is created for certain purposes that in this case, the purpose of the
image and the video is to convey relevant information about the topic and give a better idea
of what the topic is about. The is eason for both is to informed the audicene in a way the
will be interesting in the case of the video or fast to read in the case of the image, for the
video it is harder to explain the infromation in a way that does not lose the audience
attention, because there are some things that might affect the attention of the audience such
as the duration of the video, if is too much infromation, if the voice is monotone, etc.; this
is some reason why convay some idea with a videa can be harder, but that does not mean
that making an image is easy. Creating an image can be also hard but not as hard as a video
because the image must be attractive for the audience, it must contain only relevant
information but in really simple word or sentence that conveys everything clear, etc.
Ethos.
The video was published by YouTube channel called Scishow presented by Hank
Gren which is really known by the people for their videos that talk about scientific topics,
they have a really good reputation because the majority of the professors in High School
use his videos for educational purposes which gives him enough credibility and gains the
trust of his audience. In the image, the author Catherine J Frompovich is a known activist
that does not support the all of the scientific resources and follow more the natural made
Running Head: What’s wrong with Vaccines 5
medications. She has a good reputation as an activist against the vaccinations and even has
written her book related to the vaccines topic called “Vaccination Voodo What do you
know about vaccines”. It seems that the video and the image came from well-known
Pathos.
In the video, the information that it's being provided are true facts that the people
can easily remember, the use of cartoon, animations, a colorful background, a calm
soundtrack that catches the audience attention were relevant to the video because it made it
interesting to the audience and also helped to highlight relevant information throughout the
video. The use of big words and the color red to remark the idea of the image worked
because it uses a color that the eyes will instantly look at that word first, also the use of a
colorful background made it interesting for the audience, as well as the use of photo of
babies that automatically the audience will make a connection with the audience that the
topic that is being exposed affects the little kids or the newborns. The video does not seem
to evoke any type of emotions because it is only informing what are the vaccines, how they
work, and the new movement that has been growing for the Anti-vaccination, this type of
video does not always evoke emotions because their purpose is to inform the society about
a certain topic. Although the video does not evoke any type of emotions, the image do
because in the image it mentions some diseases that are caused as a consequence for some
vaccines and this type of information may cause the feeling of worries among the audience
primarily with the adults that want to have babies or adults that already had their baby.
Apparently, it seems that both reach their goal that consisted in informs and advertises the
Logos.
The video was a little bit too long because it almost last about 10 min that for some
people can be boring, the video had the advantage that it uses another resource to
complement the video and not make it boring. The information that was provided with the
two genres were true facts and accurate information that helped the audience to understand
the main idea of both the video and the image and what was their topic about. The video
was very well structured because he had an order in which he was explaining everything
carefully so the audience could understand it, the presenter always tried to maintain the
audience attention by changing the sound of their voice and also making it more expressive
so the audience could see the variety of importance of the things, that also help the
audience to determine in which situations the should pay more attention to the things he
was saying.
It is very important to compare and contrast because that is the way in how two
things can be analyzed by finding their similarities and their difference. In this case, the
similarity that the video and the image share was that both convey the negative effects that
the vaccines have, also the format they had because in both is used the help of some photos,
big words, the variety of colors, and a colorful background. However, they had differences
in which the video used soundtrack, it also used cartoons to explain the information, and
also a big difference between them is that in the video there was someone explaining the
information, and in the image, it was only what the audience could understand form few
points. A strong similarity that both have is that both could well explain what the topic or
the problem that will try to be addressed, both seem to be really good sources the anyone
Running Head: What’s wrong with Vaccines 7
who is conducting a research about the topic or want to learn more about this idea could
Conclusion.
At the end, both genres achieved their purpose because both share their point of
view about the topic of the vaccines, also that both used really good things to catch the
audience attention. In both cases, they give information about the topic that might influence
the audience decision or change their point of view related to the topic. Although both
genres were really clear at the moment of conveying information, the one that will have
more effect on society will be the image because the video was too long and if someone
who does not know anything about the topic it wouldn’t be really interested in watching a
long video for something they don’t know, also because an image is easier to spread faster
with the society because it only takes about a minute to watch it and because anyone can
tell what is the main idea and the purpose of the image right after watching the image.
Running Head: What’s wrong with Vaccines 8
References.
Frompovich, C. J. (2015, January 25). New Illuminati. Retrieved February 11, 2018, from
http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.mx/2015/01/vaccines-infect-vaccinated-
unvaccinated.html
S. (2015, February 19). The Science of Anti-Vaccination. Retrieved February 11, 2018,
from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rzxr9FeZf1g&t=131s