Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Author Note
An incident occurred where a white tenured teacher, Ann Griffin, said that she “hated all
black folks.” According to a negative conversation with Principal Freddie Watts and Assistant
Principal Jimmy Brothers. Both administrators are African-American and were assigned to
administer a predominantly black high school. When the conversation and statement from Ann
Griffin leaked, it resulted in negativity from colleagues both black and white. Ann Griffin was
recommended dismal by the Principal because of concerns regarding her ability to treat students
Pro Support
Supporting the decision of dismissal, a famous case that we all know for using a racial
slur and argument was rejected by the court is Brown v. Chicago Board of Education. This case
involved a sixth grade teacher Lincoln Brown, trying to give students a lesson about using an
inappropriate word. The teacher took a note away from students that were talking about rap
lyrics that involved this word, and gave a lesson about why the word hurts people while the
principal was in the classroom. Backing up the results, Chicago Board of Education has a policy
EEOC Obtains $122,500 from Houston Construction Company for Religious, Race and
National Origin Discrimination. If we were to put Ann Griffin’s situation in reverse and say that
she was the principal and she made the same remark to the other two as teachers, those
“teachers” could sue just as this Houston Constructive Company case. It’s discrimination and
Con Support
RECOMMENDED DISMISSAL 3
Siding with the teacher for statement she used, we would compare recent case Craig
Hecht v. National Heritage Academies. With the teacher receiving more than $500,000 thanks to
the jury, even though most would agree what he did wasn’t appropriate. Craig Hecht is white
third-grade teacher, with a good record from the past, made a racial joke and was fired for it. The
joke being “white tables are better than brown tables and brown should burn,” while students
were present. Reason for winning the case, that there has been many racial remarks from
Similar cases with having race and hate, we could look at the case Brandenburg v. Ohio.
This case had a rule of prohibiting that “Speech can be prohibited if it is “directed at inciting or
producing imminent lawless action” and it is likely to incite or produce such action.” Just as the
case Ann Griffin did not give a threat or anything unlawful. Though she had the right of Freedom
of Speech, it was a personal conversation between her and the two administrators.
Conclusion
Reading all the similar cases and the decisions from all of them didn’t really change my
opinion of Ann Griffin’s case. Racial Discrimination should not be allowed in schools and should
be faced with consequences. I didn’t agree with the results from the case Craig Hecht v. National
Heritage Academies, Hecht should of faced consequences and the school should deal with
situation with racial jokes serious; four hundred years of oppression and Craig Hecht receives
$500,000 because he faced the appropriate consequence from racial remarks in environment with
children and education. Ann Griffin did not make a racial joke, she stated that she “hated,” and
the appropriate decision is to terminate her and remove her teaching license.
RECOMMENDED DISMISSAL 4
References
http://courts.mi.gov/Courts/MichiganSupremeCourt/oral-arguments/2015
2016/Pages/150616.aspx
Harris, D. (2011, July 19). Teacher wins $500K judgment in suit vs. Linden Charter Academy
over firing because of racial joke. Retrieved January 30, 2017, from
http://www.mlive.com/news/flint/index.ssf/2011/07/teacher_wins_500k_judgment_in.html
Walsh, M. (2016, June 03). Appeals Court Upholds Suspension in Teacher's Use of Racial Slur in
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/school_law/2016/06/appeals_court_upholds_suspensi.html
http://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/constitutional-law/constitutional-law-keyed-to-
stone/freedom-of-expression/brandenburg-v-ohio-2/2/