Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1
Chapter Summary
Chapter Five introduces the reader to the social process
theories of crime.
The chapter begins with an overview of differential
association theory, and how this theory developed out of
the neoclassical theories.
This follows with a description of the social bond theories.
Theories regarding labeling and neutralization are the last
theories to be discussed in Chapter Five.
The author follows with an overview of the pros and cons of
each of the theories. Chapter Five concludes with the
policy implications set forth by each of the social process
theories.
2
Chapter Summary
3
Introduction
4
Introduction
5
Differential Association Theory
6
Differential Association Theory
The principle part of learning criminal behavior
occurs within intimate personal groups.
When criminal behavior is learned, the learning
includes techniques of committing the crime, the
specific direction of motives, drives,
rationalizations, and attitudes.
7
Differential Association Theory
8
Differential Association Theory
9
Differential Association Theory
10
Figure 5.1 Diagrammatic Presentation of
Differential Association Theory
11
Ronald Acker’s Social Learning Theory
Social learning theory applies the concepts of
operant psychology to the vague “definitions
favorable.”
Operant psychology: A perspective on learning
that asserts that behavior is governed and shaped
by its consequences.
Behavior has two general consequences; it is
reinforced or it is punished.
Reinforcement: Positive or negative consequences
for behavior that make it more likely the behavior
will be repeated in similar situations.
12
Ronald Acker’s Social Learning Theory
13
Figure 5.2
Illustrating Types of Reinforcement and Punishment
14
Social Control Theories
15
Walter Reckless’ Containment Theory
Walter Reckless’ theory is an early control
that sought answers to why it is that some
people in similar environments are immune to
criminal temptations and others are not.
Those of us who resist antisocial temptations
are contained by two overlapping forms of
containment: outer and inner.
Outer containment is the social pressure on
individuals brought to bear by the family &
other important individuals and groups to
abide by community rules.
16
Walter Reckless’ Containment Theory
Inner containment
relies heavily on how
persons see
themselves—their
self-concept.
Persons with a negative
self-concept are more
likely to become
criminal and delinquent
than persons with a
positive self-concept.
17
Travis Hirschi’s Social Bonding Theory
18
The Four Social Bonds
Hirshi makes the assumption that the typical
delinquent lacks:
Attachment: Emotional component of conformity.
Commitment: Rational component of conformity and
refers to a lifestyle in which one has invested
considerable time and energy in the pursuit of a
lawful career.
Involvement: A direct consequence of commitment;
it is a part of an overall conventional patter of
existence.
Belief: The acceptance of the social norms
regulating conduct.
Antisocial and criminal behavior will emerge
automatically if social controls are lacking.
19
From Social- to Self-Control: Gottfredson & Hirschi’s
Low Self-Control Theory
20
Figure 5.3
Diagrammatic Representation of Hirschi's
Social Control Theory
21
The Origin of Self-Control
Low self-control
is established in early childhood, it tends to persist
throughout life, and it is the result of incompetent
parenting.
Low self-control
is the default outcome that occurs in the absence
of adequate socialization.
Low self-control is considered a stable component
of a criminal personality.
A criminal opportunity is a situation that presents
itself to an offender by which he or she can
immediately satisfy needs with minimal mental or
physical effort.
22
Labeling Theory:
The Irony of Social Reaction
23
Figure 5.4
Diagrammatic Representation of Self-Control
Theory
24
The Nature of Crime
25
Primary & Secondary Deviance
Edwin Lemert: Primary deviance is the initial
nonconforming act that comes to the attention
of the authorities.
Secondary deviance: Deviance that results from
society’s reaction to offenders’ primary deviance
Labeled persons may alter their self-concepts in
conformity with the label.
The label may exclude the person from
conventional employment opportunities & lead to
the loss of conventional friends.
26
Figure 5.5
Diagrammatic Presentation of Labeling Theory
27
Extending Labeling Theory
28
Sykes and Matza’s Neutralization Theory
Techniques of neutralization
theory suggests that although
delinquents know that their
behavior is wrong, they justify it as
“acceptable” on a number of
grounds:
Five techniques of neutralization
Denial of responsibility
Denial of injury
Denial of victim
Condemnation of the condemners
Appeal to higher loyalties
29
Sykes and Matza’s Neutralization Theory
30
Evaluation of Social Process Theories
Differential association theory shares the
unconstrained vision in that it assumes that it is
antisocial behavior is learned, & not something
that comes naturally in the absence of prosocial
training.
Critics of differential association stress that
antisocial behavior comes naturally to the
unsocialized individual & the theory ignores
individual differences.
31
Evaluation of Social Process Theories
32
Evaluation of Social Process Theories
33
Evaluation of Social Process Theories
34
Theory Key Concepts Strengths Weaknesses
Differential Crime is learned in Explains the onset of Neglects possibility of like
Association association with peers offending and the seeking like (birds of a
holding definitions power of peer feather). Does not make
favorable to law violation. pressure. distinction between private
Most likely to occur in accepters and temporary
differentially organized compliers.
(lower-class)
neighborhoods.
Social Definitions favorable to Adds powerful Neglects individual
Learning law violation depend on concepts of operant differences affecting what
history of reinforcement psychology to explain is reinforcing to whom and
and punishment. Excess how people learn the ease or difficulty with
rewards for criminal criminal behavior. which one learns.
behavior perpetuate it. Links sociology to
psychology.
Social Bonds to social The most popular and Neglects structural
Bonding institutions prevent empirically variables contributing to
crime, which otherwise supported theory. family instability and to
comes naturally. The Emphasizes loss of occupational
bonds are attachment, importance of the opportunities. Neglects
commitment, involvement, family and provides differences in the ease
and belief. workable policy with which attachment 35
is
recommendations. achieved.
Theory Key Concepts Strengths Weaknesses
Self-Control Low self-control explains all Identifies a single Claims too much for a
crime and analogous acts. Low measurable trait to be single trait. Neglects child
self-control occurs in the responsible for many influences on parenting
absence of proper parenting. antisocial behaviors. behavior and the affects
Exposure to criminal Accords well with the of genes on low self-
opportunities explains impulsive nature of most control.
differences in criminal criminal behavior. Links
behavior among low self-control sociology to psychology.
individuals.
Labeling Crime has no independent Explains consequences of The neglect of causes of
reality. Original primary labeling with a “master primary deviance. Advice
deviance is unimportant; what status.” Identifies the that criminals should be
is important is the labeling social construction of treated not punished
process, which leads to crime and points to the contradicts the theory
secondary (continuing) power of some (the that says that there is
deviance. Labeling people powerful) to criminalize nothing intrinsically bad
criminal leads them to organize the acts of others (the about crime and therefore
their self-concepts around that powerless). there is nothing to “treat.”
label.
Neutralization Delinquents and criminals learn Emphasizes that criminals Says nothing about the
to neutralize moral constraints are no more fully origins of behavior being
and thus their guilt for committed to antisocial neutralized. More a theory
committing crimes. They drift attitudes than they are to of antisocial
in and out of crime. prosocial attitudes. Shows rationalization than of
how criminals handle crime. 36
feelings of guilt.
Policy & Prevention:
Implications of Social Process Theory
If learning crime and delinquency within a
particular culture is the problem, then changing
relative aspects of that culture appear to be the
answer; the provision of positive role models to
replace negative role models.
Given the importance of nurturance and
attachment, both versions of control theory
support the idea of early family intervention
designed to cultivate these things.
37
Policy & Prevention:
Implications of Social Process Theory
38
Policy & Prevention:
Implications of Social Process Theory
39