Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Case histories of refinery vacuum tower problems solved are gleaned from
five decades of experience
NORMAN LIEBERMAN
Process Improvement Engineering
T
he objectives of operating Steam
a refinery vacuum tower
are typically to produce No.1 jet
T1
asphalt of proper viscosity or Steam
to minimise the heavy virgin Vacuum P1
gas oil content of the vacuum tower
LVGO P/A
residue going to the delayed
coker feed or to industrial fuel LVGO
No.2 jet
oil. In many cases, the ability
to achieve these objectives is HVGO P/A Steam
the largest factor in determin- HVGO
ing refinery profitability.
Principally, the main objective Wash oil
packing
of the refinery operator is to No.3 jet
Crude tower
restore the degraded vacuum bottoms
in the vacuum tower flash zone
(see Figure 1). The following
case histories illustrate the Quench
problem that occurs in many, if
not most refineries at the start Resid.
of every summer. The problem
is that both ambient air and Figure 1 Vacuum system
plant cooling water tempera-
tures increase. This results in afternoons starting in July the ejector was being overloaded
the first stage ejector surging, a first stage ejector began to with light virgin naphtha
step change degradation in surge and continued to do so components originating in the
vacuum, and vacuum tower until the late evening when crude – that is, in the vacuum
pressure instability. ambient temperatures declined. tower feed from the crude
An analysis of the off-gas from atmospheric tower bottoms.
Increase in vacuum tower top the third stage ejector (see Apparently, the recovery of
temperature Figure 1) indicated a high light naphtha in the crude
In one 40 000 b/d crude unit at concentration of both iso- and tower from the atmospheric
an East coast US refinery, n-pentanes. As the C5 olefin residue was poor. In cooler
producing delayed coker content remained low, we weather, when the LVGO
vacuum resid, during most concluded that the first stage pumparound return was also