Sei sulla pagina 1di 89

DESIGN OF PIER (P3) WITH PILE

FOUNDATION

FOR ROB AT CH. 6+472.6


INDEX

Sr. No. Items Page No.

1 Input Data 1-9

2 Seismic Coeff. Calculation 10-11

3 Horizontal Force Calculation at Bearing Level

ULS Method 12-15

Foundation Design 16-18

Stability Check 19-20

SLS Method 21-23

Centrifugal and other Forces 24-25

4 Wind Calculation 26-27

5 Stability of Foundation 28-39

6 Design of Foundation 40-51

7 Pile Cap design 52-60

8 Pier Shaft Design 61-69

9 Pier Cap Design 70-84

10 ANNEXURE-I : CWLL 85-87

11 ANNEXURE-II :ULS Check for Pile 88-91

12 ANNEXURE-III :ULS and SLS Check for Pier Shaft 92-98

13 Annexure-IV : Design of Seismic Stopper 99-104


Design Calculation ICT Input Data

Detailed Design of Substructure & Pile Foundation

Span Arrangement Left Span Right Span


c/c distance between Bearing - Left Span = 36.000 m c/c distance between Bearing -Right Span = 38.000 m
projection beyond CL of brg.-Left support = 0.725 m projection beyond CL of brg.-Left support = 0.975 m
projection beyond CL of brg.-Right support = 0.725 m projection beyond CL of brg.-Right support = 0.975 m
Total Length of Left Span = 37.450 m Total Length of Right Span = 39.950 m
Expansion Gap = 50.000 mm Expansion Gap = 50.000 mm
c/c distance between Expansion Gap - Left Span = 37.50 m c/c distance bet. Expansion Gap - Right Span = 40.00 m
Congestion Factor = 1.300 Congestion Factor = 1.300

Type of Superstructure = Steel plate Girder Type of Superstructure = Precast PSC Girder
Radius of Curvature = 0.000 m

Angle of Skew = 0 Degrees

Cos 0 = 1.000 Sin 0 = 0.000 tan 0 = 0.000

Calculation of Impact Factor AS per IRC 6:2014,Clause 208.2


Impact Factor - 70 RW = 1.182 Superstructure Impact Factor - 70 RW = 1.102 Superstructure
Impact Factor -Class A {1+9/(13.5+L)} = 1.182 Superstructure Impact Factor -Class A {1+4.5/(6+L)} = 1.102 Superstructure
Impact Factor - 70 RW = 1.182 Bearing Impact Factor - 70 RW = 1.102 Bearing
Impact Factor -Class A = 1.182 Bearing Impact Factor -Class A = 1.102 Bearing
Impact Factor - 70 RW = 1.091 Pier Cap Impact Factor - 70 RW = 1.051 Pier Cap
Impact Factor -Class A = 1.091 Pier Cap Impact Factor -Class A = 1.051 Pier Cap

Bearings
Type of Bearing = Elastomeric & Pin Bearing Type of Bearing = Elastomeric & Pin Bearing
No of Bearings/Pedestral = 5 excluding pin brgNo of Bearings/Pedestral = 4 excluding metallic guided brg
C/C Distance of Bearing in Transverse Direction= 2.500m (Skew) C/C Distance of Bearing in Transverse Direction
= 3.000m (Skew)

Details of Superstructures and Salient Reduced Levels's (RL's)

LEFT SIDE SPAN RIGHT SIDE SPAN


Deck level at Median edge = 277.300 m Deck level at Median Edge = 277.300 m
Deck level at outer edge = 277.070 m Deck level at outer edge = 277.070 m
Deck level at center line of bridge = 277.185 m Deck level at center line of bridge = 277.185 m
Soffit Level = 275.295 m Soffit Level = 274.406 m

Pier Cap Top Level = 274.895 m Pier Cap Top Level = 274.016 m
Bearing Level = 275.295 m Bearing Level = 274.376 m
C/C of span = 36.000 m C/C of span = 38.000 m
Max Depth of Superstructure = 1.831 m Max Depth of Superstructure = 2.720 m

NH-72A and NH-73 1 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Input Data

Depth of Bearing+Pedestal 1 = 0.300 m Bearing Plate = 0.00 m


Depth of Bearing+Pedestal 2 = 0.350 m Depth of Bearing+Pedestal 1 = 0.300 m
Depth of Bearing+Pedestal 3 = 0.400 m Depth of Bearing+Pedestal 2 = 0.360 m
Depth of Bearing+Pedestal 4 = 0.450 m Depth of Bearing+Pedestal 3 = 0.420 m
Depth of Bearing+Pedestal 5 = 0.500 m Depth of Bearing+Pedestal 4 = 0.480 m
Depth of Bearing+Pedestal 6 = 0.000 m Depth of Bearing+Pedestal 5 = 0.000 m
Depth of Bearing+Pedestal 7 = 0.000 m Depth of Bearing+Pedestal 6 = 0.000 m
Distance of nearest girder from c.l. of bridge = 0.000 m Depth of Bearing+Pedestal 7 = 0.000 m
Depth of Bow string arch = 0.000 m Distance of nearest girder from c.l. of bridge = 1.500 m
Depth of Bow string arch = 0.000 m
Common For Both Span
Pier Cap Bottom Level = 272.216 m Thickness of Wearing Coat = 0.050 m
Pier Shaft Top Level = 272.216 m Camber slope = 2.00 %
Pier Shaft Bottom Level = 265.000 m Width of Carriageway = 11.5 m
GL/FL/LBL/Cross road level = 266.074 m Total Width of Superstructure = 12.5 m
Pile Cap Top Level = 265.000 m Nos. of Lane for design purpose = 3 LANE
Pile Cap Bottom Level = 262.700 m Dia of Pile = 1.20 m
Pile Tip Level = 236.700 m Depth of Pile Cap = 2.30 m
Cross road level = 0.000 m Length of Pile = 26.00 m
Rock level = 0.000 m Nos of Pile in Longitudinal Side in one row = = 2 Nos
Nos of Pile in Transverse Side in one row = 4 Nos m/s
Wedge over girder = 0.018 m
Cross girder depth below centre girder 0.000 m

C.G OF CRASH Barrier From Deck Top = 0.447 m C.G OF CRASH Barrier From Deck Top = 0.447 m
C.G OF Wearing Cousrse from Deck Top = 0.025 m

Dimensions of Substructure & Foundation

(i) Pier Cap

Along L-L Axis Along T-T Axis


Width of Uniform Portion = 3.750 m Right Length of Uniform Portion = 12.500 m Right
Width of Uniform Portion = 3.750 m Skew Length of Uniform Portion = 12.500 m Skew
Width of Cap at Bottom = 3.750 m Right Length of Varrying Portion at bottom = 2.200 m Skew
Height of Uniform depth = 0.900 m
Height of triangular portion = 0.900 m

SPAN-LEFT SPAN-Right Expansion Gap


C/C distance of Bearing along L-L = 0.725 + 0.975 + 0.050 = 1.750 m

C/C distance of Bearing along T-T = 3.000 m (Straight) 3.000m (Skew)

(ii) Pier Shaft

Width/Dia of pier shaft = 2.000 m No of Pier = 1 c/c distance between Piers = 0.000
Length/Dia. of Pier = 2.000 m
cut water portion(semi-circular) = 0.000 m 0.0000 Height of Pier shaft = 7.216 m
Length / Dia of pier = 2.000 m

NH-72A and NH-73 2 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Input Data

(iii) Pile Cap

along L-L Axis along T-T Axis


Projection of Pile Cap on Left Side of Pier = 1.550 m Projection of Pile Cap on Footpath Side of Pier = 5.150 m
Projection of Pile Cap on Right Side of Pier= 1.550 m Projection of Pile Cap on Median Side of Pier= 5.150 m
Distance Between Piles Centre in Longitudinal Direction= 3.600 m Distance Between Piles Centre in Transverse Direction= 3.600 m
Projection of Pile Cap from C/L of piles in longitudinal direction= 0.750 m Projection of Pile Cap from C/L of piles in Transverse direction= 0.750 m
Length of Pile Cap in Longitudinal Direction= 5.100 m Projection of Pile Cap from C/L of piles in Transverse direction= 0.750 m
Length of Pile Cap in Transverse Direction= 12.300 m

Design Data & Material Specification


Pile & Pile Cap
Conc Grade = M 35
Characteristic Compressive Strength of Concrete,fck = 35.00 Mpa at 28 days
Design Compressive strength of Concrete, fcd = 15.63 Mpa at 28 days (0.67/1.5 * fck)
Tensile strength of concrete , fctm = 2.77 MPa
Strain at reaching Characteistic Strength, ec2 = 0.02
Ultimate Strain, ecu2 = 0.035
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete ( Ec ) = 29580.40 N/mm2 ( 5000 x sqrt ( fck )
2
Ecm = 32308.250 N/mm
Steel Grade = Fe 500 D (HYSD Steel)
Yield Strength of Reinforcement, fy or fyk = 500 Mpa
Design Yield Strength of Reinforcement, fyd = 434.78 Mpa (1/1.15 * fy)
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel ( Es) = 200000.00 Mpa

Pier & Pier Cap


Conc Grade pier cap = M 40
Characteristic Compressive Strength of Concrete,fck = 40.00 Mpa at 28 days
Design Compressive strength of Concrete, fcd = 17.87 Mpa at 28 days (0.67/1.5 * fck)
Tensile strength of concrete , fctm = 3.03 MPa

Ecm = 33345.764 N/mm2

Dry weight of Concrete = 25 kN/m3


Dry unit weight of soil = 20 kN/m3

Permissible Crack Width = 0.3 mm - For Moderate Exposure Condition

Type of Soil = 2 Medium Soil Strata

NH-72A and NH-73 3 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Input Data

Maximum compressive stress in concrete ( Refer Clause 12.2.1 of IRC:112-2011)

under rare combination = 16.8 N/mm2


Under Quasi-Permenant Combination = 12.6 N/mm2
Maximum tensile stress in steel = 300 N/mm2

Clear Cover to Reinforcement


Cover for pier shaft = 50 mm
Cover for pile cap and pile shaft = 75 mm

Seismic Data:
Seismic Zone = 4
Z =Zone factor = 0.24
I =Importance factor = 1.2 for important bridges
R =Response Reduction factor = 3 in Longitudinal direction For substructure except pier cap
= 3 In Transverse direction For substructure except pier cap
= 3 For Pier Cap/Beam

Vertical load capacity of pile (Normal Case) = 4513 KN From Geotechnical Report
Vertical load capacity of pile (Wind Case) = 5641 KN From Geotechnical Report multiplied by 25%
Vertical load capacity of pile ( Seismic Case) = 5641 KN From Geotechnical Report multiplied by 25%

Horizontal load capacity of pile (Normal Case) = 130.8 KN From Geotechnical Report

NH-72A and NH-73 4 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT DL+SIDL+LL

CALCULATION OF DEAD LOAD , SIDL , CWLL

( Note: 5% increase in DL,SIDL,Wearing course due to varies overhange)


Dead Load Reaction from Superstructure Analysis
Trans. Trans.
Ecce. (m) Ecce. (m)
LHS skew RHS skew
DL reaction on Bearing1 = 433.59 kN 5.000 DL reaction on Bearing1 1262.97
kN
= 4.500
DL reaction on Bearing2 = 433.59 kN 2.500 DL reaction on Bearing2 1312.36
kN
= 1.500
DL reaction on Bearing3 = 433.59 kN 0.000 DL reaction on Bearing3 1312.36
kN
= -1.500
DL reaction on Bearing4 = 433.59 kN -2.500 DL reaction on Bearing4 1262.97
kN
= -4.500
DL reaction on Bearing5 = 433.59 kN -5.000 DL reaction on Bearing5 0.00 kN
= 0.000
DL reaction on Bearing6 = 0.00 kN 0.000 DL reaction on Bearing4 0.00 kN
= 0.000
DL reaction on Bearing7 = 0.00 kN 0.000 DL reaction on Bearing5 0.00 kN
= 0.000
Total DL Reaction = 2167.969 kN 0.000 Total DL Reaction 5150.654 kN
= 0.000

SIDL Reaction from Superstructure Analysis (without Wearing Course )


Trans. Trans.
LHS Ecce. (m) RHS Ecce. (m)
SIDL reaction on Bearing1 = 333.731 kN 5.000 SIDL reaction on Bearing1140.000
kN= 4.500
SIDL reaction on Bearing2 = -172.725 kN 2.500 SIDL reaction on Bearing2 19.500
kN= 1.500
SIDL reaction on Bearing3 = 84.989 kN 0.000 SIDL reaction on Bearing3 19.500
kN= -1.500
SIDL reaction on Bearing4 = -172.725 kN -2.500 SIDL reaction on Bearing4140.000
kN= -4.500
SIDL reaction on Bearing5 = 333.731 kN -5.000 SIDL reaction on Bearing5 0.000
kN= 0.000
SIDL reaction on Bearing6 = 0.000 kN 0.000 SIDL reaction on Bearing4 0.000
kN= 0.000
SIDL reaction on Bearing7 = 0.000 kN 0.000 SIDL reaction on Bearing5 0.000
kN= 0.000
Total SIDL Reaction = 407.001 kN 0.000 Total SIDL Reaction 319.000 kN 0.000
Reaction due to Wearing Coat from Superstructure Analysis
Trans. Trans.
LHS Ecce. (m) RHS Ecce. (m)
WC reaction on Bearing1 = 81.400kN 5.000 WC reaction on Bearing1 126.891 kN
= 4.500
WC reaction on Bearing2 = 101.750kN 2.500 WC reaction on Bearing2 138.427 kN
= 1.500
WC reaction on Bearing3 = 101.750kN 0.000 WC reaction on Bearing3 138.427 kN
= -1.500
WC reaction on Bearing4 = 101.750kN -2.500 WC reaction on Bearing4 126.891 kN
= -4.500
WC reaction on Bearing5 = 81.400kN -5.000 WC reaction on Bearing5 0.000 kN
= 0.000
WC reaction on Bearing6 = 0.000kN 0.000 WC reaction on Bearing4 0.000 kN
= 0.000
WC reaction on Bearing7 = 0.000kN 0.000 WC reaction on Bearing5 0.000 kN
= 0.000
TOTAL REACTION ( WC ) = 468.050 kN 0.000 TOTAL REACTION ( WC 530.636
) kN
= 0.000

From Annexure-I
MAXIMUM REACTION CASE: Reduction Factor = 0.9

1-70R + 1-CLASS A
Total Reaction on LHS brg. 1185.74 kN and Corresponding Transverse moment 1792.99 kNm
Total Reaction on RHS brg. 212.86 kN and Corresponding Transverse moment 520.28 kNm

SV LOAD
Total Reaction on LHS brg. 2490.87 kN and Corresponding Transverse moment 996.35 kNm
Total Reaction on RHS brg. 2189.13 kN and Corresponding Transverse moment 875.65 kNm

MAXIMUM TRASVERSE MOMENT CASE: Reduction Factor = 1


1-70R
Total Reaction on LHS brg. 890.82 kN and Corresponding Transverse moment 2810.54 kNm
Total Reaction on RHS brg. 109.18 kN and Corresponding Transverse moment 344.46 kNm

Computation of volumes of Subsoil Components

i) Bearing Pedestal
Left Span : Trans. Ecc
Pedestal 1 = 0.300 x 0.800 x 0.800 = 0.1920 m3 5.000
3
Pedestal 2 = 0.350 x 0.800 x 0.800 = 0.2240 m 2.500
3
Pedestal 3 = 0.400 x 0.800 x 0.800 = 0.2560 m 0.000
3
Pedestal 4 = 0.450 x 0.800 x 0.800 = 0.2880 m -2.500
3
Pedestal 5 = 0.500 x 0.800 x 0.800 = 0.3200 m -5.000
4
Pedestal 6 0.000 x 0.800 x 0.800 = 0.0000 m 0.000
5
Pedestal 7 0.000 x 0.800 x 0.800 = 0.0000 m 0.000
3
1.2800 m -0.625

NH-72A and NH-73 5 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT DL+SIDL+LL

Right Span :
3
Pedestal 1 = 0.300 x 0.800 x 0.800 = 0.1920 m 4.500
3
Pedestal 2 = 0.360 x 0.800 x 0.800 = 0.2304 m 1.500
3
Pedestal 3 = 0.420 x 0.800 x 0.800 = 0.2688 m -1.500
3
Pedestal 4 = 0.480 x 0.800 x 0.800 = 0.3072 m -4.500
3
Pedestal 5 = 0.000 x 0.800 x 0.800 = 0.0000 m 0.000
Pedestal 6 = 0.000 x 0.800 x 0.800 = 0.0000 0.000
Pedestal 7 = 0.000 x 0.800 x 0.800 = 0.0000 0.000
3
0.9984 m -0.577

ii) Seismic Arrestor


Left Span: Nos.
3
Long. Arrestor = 0.350 x 0.850 x 0.800 0.2380 m 5
3
Transverse arrestor = 0.550 x 0.600 x 0.870 = 0.2871 m 2

Right Span:
Long. Arrestor = 0.500 x 0.650 x 0.700 = 0.2275 m3 0
Transverse Arrestor = 0.550 x 0.725 x 1.025 = 0.4087 m3 2

(iii) Pier Cap

3
Volume 1 = 12.500 x 3.750 x 0.900 = 66.994 m
+ 3.750 x ( 12.500 + 2.200 ) x 0.90
2.000
3
Volume 2 due to additional height of cap = 0.879x 1.875 x 12.500 = 20.602 m
Long. Eccentricity due to additional weight of cap = 1.875 - 0.938 = -0.938 m

(iv) Pier Shaft


3
Volume of Pier Shaft = 1.000 0.79 x 4.000 x 7.216 = 22.670 m

(v) Pile Cap

3
Volume = 5.100 x 12.300 x 2.3 = 144.279 m

(vi) Volume of Overburden Earth Over Pile Cap


3
Volume of earthfill over pile cap = ( 62.73 - 3.1 ) x 1.074 = 63.998 m

NH-72A and NH-73 6 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Load Combination

Possible Load Combination

1 COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case

2 COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal Dry Case


NORMAL
CASE
3 COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -Normal Dry Case

4 COMB 4 : DL+SIDL -one Span Dislodege Normal case

5 COMB 5 : COMB 2 + WL -Normal Dry Case


WIND
6 COMB 6: COMB 3 + WL -Wind Dry Case
CASE
7 COMB 7 : DL+SIDL+WL -one Span Dislodege Wind case

8 COMB 8 : COMB 1 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case

9 COMB 9 : COMB 1 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case

10 COMB 10 : COMB 2 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case

11 COMB 11 : COMB 2 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case


SEISMIC
CASE
12 COMB 12 : COMB 3 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case

13 COMB 13 : COMB 3 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case

14 COMB 14 : DL+SIDL+EQ-L -one Span Dislodege Seismic case

15 COMB 15 : DL+SIDL+EQ-T -one Span Dislodege Seismic case

NH-72A and NH-73 7 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT General Elevation

FIGURE SHOWING SALIENT FEATURE OF PIER AND FOUNDATION


277.3 DECK LEVEL
WEARING COAT

SUPERSTRUCTURE SUPERSTRUCTURE

3.75
PIER CAP

PIER SHAFT

2
266.074 GROUND LEVEL

#REF! 5.1

3.6

NH-72A and NH-73 8 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Load Factor

Load Factors:

Table B.2 Partial Safety Factor For Verification of Structural Strength: Ultimate Limit State

Loads Normal Case Seismic Case

Dead Laod+SIDL , Back


1.350 1.35
Fill except wearing course
SIDL ( Wearing Course
1.750 1.75
only)
CWLL ( Service ) 1.500 0.20

CWLL ( Construction) 1.350 1.00

Wind Load-accompanying 0.900 -


Seismic Effect ( during
1.50
service)
Seismic Effect ( during
0.75
construction)

Table B.3 Partial Safety Factor For Verification of Servicibilty Limit State

Quasi-
Loads Rare Case Frequent Combination Permanent
Combination
Dead Laod+SIDL 1.00 1.00 1.00
Surfacing 1.20 1.20 1.20
CWLL 1.00 0.75 0.00
Wind Load 0.60 0.50 0.00

Table B.4 Partial Safety Factor For Design of Foundation

Loads Normal Case Seismic Case

Dead Laod+SIDL except


1.350 1.35
wearing course
SIDL ( Wearing Course
1.750 1.75
only)
CWLL ( Service ) 1.500 0.75

CWLL ( Construction) 1.350 1.00

Wind Load 0.900 -


Seismic Effect ( during
1.50
service)
Seismic Effect ( during
0.75
construction)

NH-72A and NH-73 9 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT SEISMIC COEFF.

Seismic coefficient Calculation


(As Per IRC:6-2017 , Clause 219)

Horizontal Seismic Force For Zone - 4

Feq = Seismic forces to be resisted


Feq = Ah x (Dead load + Appropriate Live load)
Ah = horizontal seismic coefficient

= Z Sa
2 g
R
I

Z = Zone factor = 0.24


I = Importance factor = 1.20
R = Response reduction factor = 3.0 in Longitudinal direction
= 3.0 In Transverse direction
= 3.0 For Pier Cap/Beam

T = Fundamental period of the bridge member (in sec.)


or horizontal vibrations.
1/2
= 2.0 D
1000F

D = appropriate dead load of the superstructure , and live load in KN

F = Horizontal force in KN required to be applied at the center of mass of the superstructure for one mm
horizontal deflection at the top of the pier/abutment along the considered direction of horizontal force.

F = 6EI
2
x *(3L-x)

C.g. of Horizontal Force acting at a height from Foundation Level in Longitudinal direction
= 9.406 m
C.g. of Horizontal Force acting at a height from Foundation Level in Tranverse direction
= 11.632 m

Pier Cap Top Level - Pile Top Level


= 9.016 m

Dimensions of Abutment Shaft


Size of shaft = 2.00 m
Numbers of shaft = 1.00 m

Moment of Inertia , Ilongitudinal


= 0.589 m4
Moment of Inertia , Itransverse
= 0.589 m4

Ecm = 3.335E+07 kN/m2

Longitudinal Direction Transverse Direction


Force = 75.5038 KN Force = 56.023 KN
D = 9043.31 KN D = 9323.030 KN
T = 0.6922 sec T = 0.8159 sec

Medium Soil Strata


Sa/g = 1.965 Sa/g = 1.667

For Substructure except pier cap


Seismic Coeff. In Longitudinal Direction = 0.094
Seismic Coeff. In Transverse Direction = 0.080
For Pier Cap
Seismic Coeff. In Longitudinal Direction = 0.094
Seismic Coeff. In Transverse Direction = 0.080

NH-72A and NH-73 10 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT SEISMIC COEFF.

Summary of Horizontal and Vertical Sesmic Coeff.

For Design of Substructure


For Substructure excluding pier cap only for Pier Cap
Ah = 0.094 in Longitudinal direction Ah = 0.094
Ah = 0.080 In Transverse direction Ah = 0.080
Av = 0.063 In Vertical Direction Av = 0.063

For Design of Foundation


For Substructure excluding pier cap only for Pier Cap
Ah = 0.127 Ah = 0.127
Ah = 0.108 Ah = 0.108
Av = 0.085 Av = 0.085

During Construction ,
Importance factor = 1.00

Summary of Horizontal and Vertical Sesmic Coeff. In Dislodge Case

For Design of Substructure


For Substructure excluding pier cap only for Pier Cap
Ah = 0.079 Ah = 0.079
Ah = 0.067 Ah = 0.067
Av = 0.052 Av = 0.052

For Design of Foundation


For Substructure excluding pier cap only for Pier Cap
Ah = 0.106 Ah = 0.106
Ah = 0.090 Ah = 0.090
Av = 0.071 Av = 0.071

NH-72A and NH-73 11 PIER-P3


CALCULATION OF LONGITUDINAL HORIZONTAL FORCES DUE TO
TEMPERATURE:

Coefficent of thermal expansion = 0.000012 / oC


o
Maximum temperature = 47.5 C
o
Minimum temperature = 2.5 C
o
Bridge Temprature = 32.5 C
Longitudinal strain = 0.0004
Shrinkage coefficent = 0.0002

Total strain for longitudinal movement = 0.0006

Horizontal movement = 0.00059 x 37.45 x 1000


1
= 22.096 mm

Size of bearing = 300 x 550 x 76 mm

Strain in bearing = 22.096 = 0.29073


76

Shear modulus = 0.9 Mpa


Shear force per Bearing = 0.2907 x 0.9 x 292 x 542
= 41410.9209 N = 4.221 t
Total shear force for 5 bearings ( with 0 % increase )
= 4.221 x 5 x 1
= 21.106 t
Refer IRC : 6 clause 214.5.1.5;
10 % increase for variation in movement of span
Total shear force = 1.1 x 21.106
= 23.217 t
Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG-ULS

Horizontal Force (HL) AT Bearings in Ultimate Limit State


(Refer Clause 211.5.1.1 of IRC:6-2017 )
Type of bearing - Elastomeric & Pin Bearing

Left Span
Load
Unfactored Basic Seismic Load (Basic
Loads (Seismic
Load Comb Comb Comb)
Comb)

DL = 2167.97 1.35 1.35 2926.76 2926.76


SIDL except wc = 407.00 1.35 1.35 549.45 549.45
WC = 468.05 1.75 1.75 819.09 819.09
FPLL = 0.00 1.5 0.2 0.00 0.00
CWLLmax-
= 0.00 1.5 0.2 0.00 0.00
Reaction case
CWLLmax-
Transv. Moment 0.00 1.5 0.2 0.00 0.00
Case =
CWLLmin = 0.00 1.5 0.2 0.00 0.00

Right Span
Load
Unfactored Basic Seismic Load (Basic
Loads (Seismic
Load Comb Comb Comb)
Comb)

DL = 5150.65 1.35 1.35 6953.38 6953.38


SIDL except wc = 319.00 1.35 1.35 430.65 430.65
WC = 530.64 1.75 1.75 928.61 928.61
FPLL = 0.00 1.5 0.2 0.00 0.00
CWLLmax-
= 1185.74 1.5 0.2 1778.61 237.15 1-70R + 1-CLASS A
Reaction case
CWLLmax-
= 2490.87 1 0 2490.87 0.00 SV LOAD
Reaction case
CWLLmax-
Transv. Moment = 890.82 1.5 0.2 1336.23 178.16
Case
CWLLmin = 109.18 1.5 0.2 163.77 21.84 1-70R + 1-CLASS A
CWLLmin = 2189.13 1 0 2189.13 0.00 SV LOAD

COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case

From Right Span


Fh = 0 kN

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 232.17 kN

NH-72A and NH-73 13 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG-ULS

COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal Dry Case 1-70R + 1-CLASS A

From Right Span


Fh due to braking = 0.2 x ( 1500.00 ) + 0.05 x ( 831.00 )
= 341.55 kN

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 573.72 kN

COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal Dry Case SV LOAD


From Right Span
Fh due to braking = 0.2 x ( 0.00 ) + 0.05 x ( 0.00 )
= 0.00 kN
Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 232.17 kN

COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -Normal Dry Case

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 573.72 kN

COMB 4 : DL+SIDL -one Span Dislodege Normal case

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 232.17 kN

COMB 5 : COMB 2 + WL -Normal Dry Case


From Right Span Load factor
Fh due to wind = 176.971 kN x 0.9 = 159.273

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 391.44 kN

COMB 6: COMB 3 + WL -Wind Dry Case

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 391.44 kN

COMB 7 : DL+SIDL+WL -one Span Dislodege Wind case


From Right Span Load factor
Fh due to wind = 176.971 kN x 0.9 = 159.273

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 232.17 kN

COMB 8 : COMB 1 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case


From Right Span

DL SIDL WC
Fh due to seismic = 0.094 x ( 10301.31 + 638.00 + 1061.27 )
Load factor
= 0.094 x 12000.580 x 1.50

= 1697.71

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 1929.88 kN

COMB 9 : COMB 1 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case


From Right Span
Fh due to seismic = 0.3 x 848.86 = 254.657 kN

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 486.83 kN

NH-72A and NH-73 14 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG-ULS

COMB 10 : COMB 2 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case


From Right Span
Fh due to seismic = 1697.71 kN
Fh due to braking = 0.2 x 200 + 0.05 x 110.8
= 45.54 kN

Total Fh = 1743.25 kN

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 1975.42 kN

COMB 11 : COMB 2 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case


From Right Span
Fh due to seismic = 0.30 x 848.86 = 254.7 kN
Fh due to braking = 45.54 kN
Total Fh = 300.20 kN

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 532.37 kN

COMB 12 : COMB 3 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 1975.42 kN

COMB 13 : COMB 3 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 532.37 kN

COMB 14 : DL+SIDL+EQ-L -one Span Dislodege Seismic case


From Right Span DL SIDL WC
Fh due to seismic = 0.079 x ( 10301.31 + 638.00 + 1061.27 )

= 0.079 x 12000.58 = 943.17


= 943.17 kN

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 707.38 kN .75 factor have been considered

COMB 15 : DL+SIDL+EQ-T -one Span Dislodege Seismic case


From Right Span
Fh due to seismic = 0.3 x 471.59 = 141.476 kN
Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 232.17 kN .75 factor have been considered

NH-72A and NH-73 15 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG-FND. Design

Horizontal Force (HL) AT Bearings For Design of Foundation


(Refer Clause 211.5.1.1 of IRC:6-2017 )
Type of bearing - Elastomeric & Pin Bearing

Left Span
Load
Unfactored Basic Load (Basic
Loads Seismic Comb (Seismic
Load Comb Comb)
Comb)

DL = 2167.97 1.35 1.35 2926.76 2926.76


SIDL except wc = 407.00 1.35 1.35 549.45 549.45
WC = 468.05 1.75 1.75 819.09 819.09
FPLL = 0.00 1.5 0.75 0.00 0.00
CWLLmax-Reaction
= 0.00 1.5 0.75 0.00 0.00
case
CWLLmax-Transv.
= 0.00 1.5 0.75 0.00 0.00
Moment Case
CWLLmin = 0.00 1.5 0.75 0.00 0.00

Right Span
Load
Unfactored Basic Load (Basic
Loads Seismic Comb (Seismic
Load Comb Comb)
Comb)

DL = 5150.65 1.35 1.35 6953.38 6953.38


SIDL except wc = 319.00 1.35 1.35 430.65 430.65
WC = 530.64 1.75 1.75 928.61 928.61
FPLL = 0.00 1.5 0.75 0.00 0.00
CWLLmax-Reaction
= 1185.74 1.5 0.75 1778.61 889.31
case
CWLLmax-Transv.
890.82 1.5 0.75 1336.23 668.12
Moment Case
CWLLmin = 109.18 1.5 0.75 163.77 81.88

COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case


From Right Span
Fh = 0 kN
Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 232.17 kN

NH-72A and NH-73 16 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG-FND. Design

COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal Dry Case

From Right Span


Fh due to braking= 0.2 x ( 1500.00 ) + 0.05 x ( 831.00 )
= 341.55 kN
Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 573.72 kN

COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -Normal Dry Case

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 573.72 kN

COMB 4 : DL+SIDL -one Span Dislodege Normal case

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 232.17 kN

COMB 5 : COMB 2 + WL -Normal Dry Case


From Right Span Load factor
Fh due to wind = 176.971 kN x 0.9 = 159.273

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 391.44 kN

COMB 6: COMB 3 + WL -Wind Dry Case

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 391.44 kN

COMB 7 : DL+SIDL+WL -one Span Dislodege Wind case


From Right Span Load factor
Fh due to wind = 176.971 kN x 0.90 = 159.273

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 232.17 kN

NH-72A and NH-73 17 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG-FND. Design

COMB 8 : COMB 1 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case


From Right Span DL SIDL WC
Fh due to seismic = 0.127 x ( 10301.31 + 638.00 + 1061.27 )
Load factor
= 0.127 x 12000.580 x 1.50
= 2291.91
Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 2524.08 kN

COMB 9 : COMB 1 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case


From Right Span
Fh due to seismic = 0.3 x 1145.96 = 343.787 kN
Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 575.96 kN

COMB 10 : COMB 2 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case


From Right Span
Fh due to seismic = 2291.91
Fh due to braking = 0.2 x 200 + 0.05 x 110.8
= 45.54 kN

Total Fh = 2337.45 kN

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 2569.62 kN

COMB 11 : COMB 2 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case


From Right Span
Fh due to seismic = 0.30 x 1145.96 = 343.79 kN
Fh due to braking = 45.54 kN
Total Fh = 389.33 kN

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 621.50 kN

COMB 12 : COMB 3 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 2569.62 kN

COMB 13 : COMB 3 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 621.50 kN

COMB 14 : DL+SIDL+EQ-L -one Span Dislodege Seismic case


From Right Span DL SIDL WC
Fh due to seismic = 0.1061 x ( 10301.31 + 638.00 + 1061.27 )

= 0.106 x 12000.580 = 1273.28


= 1273.28 kN

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 954.96 kN

COMB 15 : DL+SIDL+EQ-T -one Span Dislodege Seismic case


From Right Span
Fh due to seismic = 0.3 x 636.64 = 190.993 kN
Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 232.17 kN

NH-72A and NH-73 18 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG-Stabilty Check

Horizontal Force (HL) AT Bearings For Stability of Foundation


(Refer Clause 211.5.1.1 of IRC:6-2017)
Type of bearing - POT-PTFE

Left Span
Load
Unfactored Basic Load (Basic
Loads Seismic Comb (Seismic
Load Comb Comb)
Comb)
DL = 2167.97 1 1 2167.97 2167.97
SIDL except wc = 407.00 1 1 407.00 407.00
WC = 468.05 1 1 468.05 468.05
FPLL = 0.00 1 1 0.00 0.00
CWLLmax-Reaction
= 0.00 1 1 0.00 0.00
case
CWLLmax-Transv.
0.00 1 1 0.00 0.00
Moment Case
CWLLmin = 0.00 1 1 0.00 0.00

Right Span
Load
Unfactored Basic Load (Basic
Loads Seismic Comb (Seismic
Load Comb Comb)
Comb)
DL = 5150.65 1 1 5150.65 5150.65
SIDL except wc = 319.00 1 1 319.00 319.00
WC = 530.64 1 1 530.64 530.64
FPLL = 0.00 1 1 0.00 0.00
CWLLmax-Reaction
= 1185.74 1 1 1185.74 1185.74 1-70R + 1-CLASS A
case
CWLLmax-Reaction
= 2490.87 1 0 2490.87 0.00 SV LOAD
case
CWLLmax-Transv.
890.82 1 1 890.82 890.82
Moment Case
CWLLmin = 109.18 1 1 109.18 109.18 1-70R + 1-CLASS A
CWLLmin = 2189.13 1 0 2189.13 0.00 SV LOAD

COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case


From Right Span
Fh = 0 kN
Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 232.17 kN

COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal Dry Case 1-70R + 1-CLASS A

From Right Span


Fh due to braking = 0.2 x ( 1000.00 ) + 0.05 x ( 554.00 )
= 227.70 kN

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 459.87 kN

COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal Dry Case SV LOAD


From Right Span
Fh due to braking = 0.2 x ( 0.00 ) + 0.05 x ( 0.00 )
= 0.00 kN

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 232.17 kN

COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -Normal Dry Case

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 459.87 kN

COMB 4 : DL+SIDL -one Span Dislodege Normal case

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 232.17 kN

NH-72A and NH-73 19 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG-Stabilty Check

COMB 5 : COMB 2 + WL -Normal Dry Case


From Left Span
mR = 152.15 kN
From Right Span Load factor
Fh due to wind = 176.971 kN x 1.00 = 176.971
Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 409.14 kN

COMB 6: COMB 3 + WL -Wind Dry Case

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 409.14 kN

COMB 7 : DL+SIDL+WL -one Span Dislodege Wind case


From Right Span Load factor
Fh due to wind = 176.971 kN x 1 = 176.971

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 232.17 kN

COMB 8 : COMB 1 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case


From Right Span DL SIDL WC
Fh due to seismic = 0.1273 x ( 10301.31 + 638.00 + 1061.27 )
Load factor
= 0.13 x 12000.58 = 1527.94 x 1.00
= 1527.94
DL SIDL WC

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 1760.11 kN

COMB 9 : COMB 1 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case


From Right Span
Fh due to seismic = 0.3 x 763.97 = 229.191 kN
Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 461.36 kN

COMB 10 : COMB 2 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case


From Right Span
Fh due to seismic = 1527.94
Fh due to braking = 0.2 x 200 + 0.05 x 110.8
= 45.54 kN
Total Fh = 1573.48 kN

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 1805.65 kN

COMB 11 : COMB 2 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case


From Right Span
Fh due to seismic = 0.30 x 763.97 = 229.2 kN
Fh due to braking = 45.54 kN
Total Fh = 274.73 kN
Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 506.90 kN

COMB 12 : COMB 3 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 1805.65 kN

COMB 13 : COMB 3 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 506.90 kN

COMB 14 : DL+SIDL+EQ-L -one Span Dislodege Seismic case


From Right Span DL SIDL WC
Fh due to seismic = 0.106 x ( 10301.31 + 638.00 + 1061.27 )
Load factor
= 0.11 x 12000.580 = 1273.28 x 0.50
= 636.64 kN

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 636.64 kN

COMB 15 : DL+SIDL+EQ-T -one Span Dislodege Seismic case


From Right Span
Fh due to seismic = 0.3 x 318.32 = 95.496 kN
Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 232.17 kN

NH-72A and NH-73 20 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG-SLS

Horizontal Force (HL) AT Bearings For Servicibilty Limit State


(Refer Clause 211.5.1.1 of IRC:6-2017 )
Type of bearing - POT-PTFE

Left Span
Quasi- Load Load (Quasi-
Unfactored Rare Frequent Load (Rare
Loads Permanent (Frequent Permanent
Load Comb Comb Comb)
Comb Comb) Comb)
DL = 2167.97 1 1 1 2167.97 2167.97 2167.97
SIDL except wc = 407.00 1 1 1 407.00 407.00 407.00
WC = 468.05 1 1 1 468.05 468.05 468.05
FPLL = 0.00 1 0.75 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLLmax-Reaction
= 0.00 1 0.75 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
case
CWLLmax-Transv.
0.00 1 0.75 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Moment Case
CWLLmin = 0.00 1 0.75 0 0.00 0.00 0.00

Right Span
Quasi- Load Load (Quasi-
Unfactored Rare Frequent Load (Rare
Loads Permanent (Frequent Permanent
Load Comb Comb Comb)
Comb Comb) Comb)
DL = 5150.65 1 1 1 5150.65 5150.65 5150.65
SIDL except wc = 319.00 1 1 1 319.00 319.00 319.00
WC = 530.64 1 1 1 530.64 530.64 530.64
FPLL = 0.00 1 0.75 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLLmax-Reaction
= 1185.74 1 0.75 0 1185.74 889.31 0.00
case
CWLLmax-Transv.
890.82 1 0.75 890.82 668.12 0.00
Moment Case
CWLLmin = 109.18 1 0.75 0 109.18 81.88 0.00

COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case -Rare Combination


From Right Span
Fh = 0 kN
Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 232.17 kN

COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal -Rare Combination


Dry Case

From Right Span


Fh due to braking = 0.2 x ( 1000.00 ) + 0.05 x ( 554.00 )
= 227.70 kN

NH-72A and NH-73 21 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG-SLS

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 459.87 kN

COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -Normal


-Rare Dry
Combination
Case

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 459.87 kN

COMB 5 : COMB 2 + WL -Normal Dry Case -Rare Combination


From Right Span Load factor
Fh due to wind = 176.971 kN x 0.60 = 106.182 kN

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 338.35 kN

COMB 6: COMB 3 + WL -Wind Dry Case -Rare Combination

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 338.35 kN

FREQUENT COMBINATION

COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case FREQUENT COMBINATION

From Right Span


Fh = 0 kN

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 232.17 kN

COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal FREQUENT


Dry Case COMBINATION

From Right Span


Fh due to braking = 0.2 x ( 1000.00 ) + 0.05 x ( 554.00 )
= 227.70 kN

NH-72A and NH-73 22 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG-SLS

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 459.87 kN

COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -Normal


FREQUENT
Dry Case
COMBINATION

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 459.87 kN

COMB 5 : COMB 2 + WL -Normal Dry Case FREQUENT COMBINATION


From Right Span Load factor
Fh due to wind = 176.971 kN x 0.50 = 88.485 kN

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 320.66 kN

COMB 6: COMB 3 + WL -Wind Dry Case FREQUENT COMBINATION

Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 320.66 kN

1. Normal Case - ( DL+SIDL)-Quasi-Permanent Combination

From Right Span


Fh = 0 kN
Maximum Net Horizontal Force = 232.17 kN

2. Normal One Span Dislodged Case - ( DL+SIDL)-Quasi-Permanent Combination Left Span Dislodge

Maximum Horizontal Force


Fh = 232.17 kN

NH-72A and NH-73 23 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT centrifugal force

Centrifugal Force Calculation


As per clause 212 of IRC:6-2017

CENTRIFUGAL FORCE C = W V2
127 R

Normal Case Seismic Case

Design Speed V = 80.00 kmph 80.00 kmph


Live Load W = 139.86 t 27.97 t
Radius of Curvature R = 0.00 m 0.00 m

CENTRIFUGAL FORCE C = 0.00 t 0.00 t


= 0.00 kN 0.00 kN

NH-72A and NH-73 24 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Vertical Reaction_Braking

Calculation of Vertical Reaction Due to Braking Force

Braking Force = 0.2 x ( 1000 ) + 0.05 x ( 554.00 )


= 227.7 kN
Deck Lvl. At
Centre of Soffit Level
Bridge
C.g. Of Force = 1.2 + ( 277.185 - 274.406 )
= 3.98 m

Moment due to Braking


= 906.02 kNm
Force

Span = 38 m
Vertical Reaction = 23.843 kN Upward
= -23.843 kN Downward

NH-72A and NH-73 25 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Wind Calc

Wind Calculation ( As Per Clause 209 of IRC:6-2017 )

basic wind speed = 47 m/s (As per IRC 6:2017 , Fig. 10)

Maximum Height of Bridge from Ground Surface = 11.226 m


As per Table 4 of IRC 6:2017
Basic wind speed = 33 m/s
Vz = 29.2 m/s
2
Pz = 512.5 N/m

modified value of Hourly mean wind speed and wind pressure for this bridge are as per below
Vz,design = Vz x 1.42 = 41.59 m/s
2
Pz,design = Pz x 2.03 = 1039.59 N/m

AS per Clause 209.3.7 of IRC 6:2017


Since Design Mean wind speed of 39.59 m/s exceed wind speed of 36 m/s, hence no Live load to be considered in wind load case

Design Wind Force on Superstructure

FT = Pz x A1 x G x Cd as per IRC 6:2017, Caluse 209.3.3

2
Where , Pz = 1039.59 N/m

Area ( A1) in Elevation


Left Side Span
Span Length = 37.500 m
Depth of superstructure = 1.831 m
Crash Barrier = 1.100 m
Area A1 = 109.913 m2

Right Side Span


Span Length = 40.000 m
Depth of superstructure = 2.720 m
Anticrash Railing = 1.100 m
Area A1 = 152.800 m2

Gust factor , G = 2.0 as per Clause 209.3.3

Left Span
Precast I-Girder
Width of Girder b = 900 mm
Depth of Girder d = 1831 mm
Ratio b/d = 0.492

Drag Coeff. Cd = 2.250

RightSpan
Precast I-Girder
Width of Girder b = 900 mm
Depth of Girder d = 2720 mm
Ratio b/d = 0.331

Drag Coeff. Cd = 2.250

FT = 257093.63 N from Left span


N acting at Level = 276.7605 m
Parallel to Span FT sin (q ) = 0.00 N acting at Level = 275.195 m
Perpendicular to span FT cos (q ) = 257093.63 N acting at Level = 276.7605 m

FT = 357410.72 N from Right Span


acting at 276.316 m
Parallel to Span FT sin (q ) = 0.00 N acting at Level = 274.316 m
Perpendicular to span FT cos (q ) = 357410.72 N acting at Level = 276.316 m

Wind Force on Live Load

Drag Coeff. Cd = 1.450

Exposed Area A1 = 38.750 x 3


2
= 116.250 m

FT = 350471.47 N

NH-72A and NH-73 26 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Wind Calc

AS per clause 209.3.4


Longitudinal Wind Force
FL = 25% FT = 64273.407 N from Left span
N acting at Level = 275.195 m
Parallel to Span FL cos (q ) = 64273.41 N acting at Level = 275.195 m
Perpendicular to span FL sin (q ) = 0.00 N acting at Level = 276.7605 m

FL = 25% FT = 176970.547 N from Right Span +live load


N acting at Level = 274.316 m
Parallel to Span FL cos (q ) = 176970.55 N acting at Level = 274.316 m
Perpendicular to span FL sin (q ) = 0.00 N acting at Level = 276.316 m

Total Wind Force in Longitudinal Direction FL = FT sin (q ) + FL cos (q ) from Left span
= 0.00 + 64273.41
= 64273.41 N acting at Level = 275.195 m

FL = FT sin (q ) + FL cos (q ) from Right Span


= 0.00 + 176970.55
= 176970.55 N acting at Level = 274.32 m

Total Wind Force in Transverse Direction FT = FT cos (q ) + -FL sin (q ) from Left span
= 257093.63 + 0.0
= 257093.63 N acting at Level = 276.761 m

FT = FT cos (q ) + -FL sin (q ) from Right Span


= 357410.72 + 0.0
= 357410.72 N acting at Level = 276.316 m
Toatl FT = 614504.35 N acting at Level = 276.502 m

Upward / Downward Wind Vertical Load ( Fv)


Fv = Pz x A3 x G x CL as per IRC 6:2014, Caluse 209.3.5
Where ,
A3 = Area in Plan ( m2) = 12.5 x 37.50
2
= 468.750 m from Left span

A3 = 12.5 x 40.00
2
= 500.0 m from Right Span

CL = 0.75

Fv = 365480.5 N from Left span


-365480.5 N Upward

Fv = 389845.9 N from Right Span


-389845.9 N upwrad

Design Wind Force on Subtsructure AS per clause 209.4 , IRC 6:2014

Pier Cap
FT = Pz x A2 x G x Cd
2
Projected area of cap in elevation A2 = 6.750 m
H/b = 0.480 & d/b= 1.96
Correspo to H/b and d/b ratio fro Table 6 Cd = 0.900

FT = 12631.0 N
Parallel to Span FT sin (q ) = 0.0 N acting at Level = 273.6 m
Perpendicular to span FT cos (q ) = 12631.0 N acting at Level = 273.6 m

Pier Shaft
2
Projected area of shaft in elevation A2 = 12.284 m
H/b = 3.1 & d/b= 1
Cd = 0.7 For circular section

FT = 17878.4 N
Parallel to Span FT sin (q ) = 0.0 N acting at Level = 269.145 m
Perpendicular to span FT cos (q ) = 17878.4 N acting at Level = 269.145 m

NH-72A and NH-73 27 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Stability of Foundation

Calculation of Forces For Foundation Base Pressure Check

Pile Cap Bottom Lvl = 262.70 Bearing top Level = 274.85 m

COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case


Unit
Load Volume Vertical Load( Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc.
Loads Weights FL (kN) FT (kN) ML = PxeL MT = PxeT
Factor (m3) P ) kN. (eL) (m) (eT) (m)
(kN/m3)
Superstructure-Left Span
Dead Load 1 2167.969 -0.875 0.000 -1896.973 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 1 407.001 -0.875 0.000 -356.126 0.000
Wearing Course 1 468.050 -0.875 0.000 -409.544 0.000
Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1 5150.654 0.875 0.000 4506.822 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 1 319.000 0.875 0.000 279.125 0.000 `
Wearing Course 1 530.636 0.875 0.000 464.306 0.000

Bearing Pedestal : Left Span 1 25 1.280 32.000 -0.875 -0.625 -28.000 -20.000
Bearing Pedestal : Right Span 1 25 0.998 24.960 0.875 -0.577 21.840 -14.400

Seismic arrestor: Left Span


Long. Arrestor 1 25 1.190 29.750 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Transverse arrestor 1 25 0.574 14.355 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Seismic arrestor: Right Span
Long. Arrestor 1 25 0.000 0.000 0.875 0.000 0.000 0.000
Transverse arrestor 1 25 0.817 20.436 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Substructure
Pier Cap 1 25 66.994 1674.844 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Additional weight of cap 1 25 20.602 515.039 -0.938 0.000 -482.849 0.000
Pier Shaft 1 25 22.670 566.743 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Pile Cap 1 25 144.279 3606.975 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Earth fill on pile cap 1 20 63.998 1279.959 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 232.171 0.000 2820.998 0.000
Total 16808.371 232.171 0.000 4919.6 -34.400

COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal Dry Case


Unit
Load Volume Vertical Load( Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc.
Loads Weights FL (kN) FT (kN) ML = PxeL MT = PxeT
Factor 3 (m3) P ) kN. (eL) (m) (eT) (m)
(kN/m )
Forces from Case 1 except
horizontal forces due to 16808.371 0.000 0.000 2098.602 -34.400
superstructure
CWLL from left span 1 0.00 -0.875 0.000 0.000
CWLL(MAX) with Braking
1 1209.584 0.875 1058.386 1792.995
Vertical Reaction
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 459.871 0.000 5587.666 0.000
Total 18017.955 459.871 0.000 8744.655 1758.595

NH-72A and NH-73 28 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Stability of Foundation

COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -Normal Dry Case


Unit
Load Volume Vertical Load( Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc.
Loads Weights FL (kN) FT (kN) ML = PxeL MT = PxeT
Factor 3 (m3) P ) kN. (eL) (m) (eT) (m)
(kN/m )
Forces from Case 1 except
horizontal forces due to 16808.371 0.000 0.000 2098.602 -34.400
superstructure
CWLL from left span 1 0.00 -0.875 0.000 0.000
CWLL(MAX) with Braking
1 914.664 0.875 800.331 2810.540
Vertical Reaction
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 459.871 0.000 5587.666 0.000
Total 17723.034 459.871 0.000 8486.599 2776.140

COMB 4 : DL+SIDL -one Span Dislodege Normal case


Unit
Load Volume Vertical Load( Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc.
Loads Weights FL (kN) FT (kN) ML = PxeL MT = PxeT
Factor (m3) P ) kN. (eL) (m) (eT) (m)
(kN/m3)
Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1 5150.654 0.875 0.000 4506.822 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 1 319.000 0.875 0.000 279.125 0.000
Wearing Course 1 530.636 0.875 0.000 464.306 0.000

Bearing Pedestal : Right Span 1 25 0.998 24.960 0.875 -0.577 21.840 -14.400

Seismic arrestor 1 64.541 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Substructure
Pier Cap 1 25 66.994 1674.844 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Additional weight of cap 1 25 20.602 515.039 -0.938 0.000 -482.849 0.000
Pier Shaft 1 25 22.670 566.743 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Pile Cap 1 25 144.279 3606.975 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Earth fill on pile cap 1 20 63.998 1279.959 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 232.171 0.000 2820.998 0.000
Total 13733.351 232.171 0.000 7610.242 -14.400

COMB 5 : COMB 2 + WL -Normal Dry Case Long. Moment Trans. Moment


Unit
Load Volume Vertical Load( C.g. of Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MT due to
Loads Weights FL (kN) FT (kN) ML = PxeL ML due to FL MT = PxeT
Factor (m3) P ) kN. Force (m) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) FT
(kN/m3)
Superstructure-Left Span
Dead Load 2167.969 -0.875 0.000 -1896.973 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 407.001 -0.875 0.000 -356.126 0.000
Wearing Course 468.050 -0.875 0.000 -409.544 0.000
CWLL 0.000 -0.875 0.000 0.000

Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 5150.654 0.875 0.000 4506.822 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 319.000 0.875 0.000 279.125 0.000
Wearing Course 530.636 0.875 0.000 464.306 0.000
CWLL 1209.584 0.875 1058.386 2810.540

Bearing Pedestal : Left Span 32.000 -0.875 -0.625 -28.000 -20.000


Bearing Pedestal : Right Span 24.960 0.875 -0.577 21.840 -14.400

Seismic arrestor 64.541 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Substructure
Pier Cap 1674.844 0.000 12.631 273.556 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 137.12
Additional weight of cap 515.039 -0.938 0.000 -482.849 0.000
Pier Shaft 566.743 0.000 17.878 269.145 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 115.23
Pile Cap 3606.975 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Earth fill on pile cap 1279.959 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Wind Load 409.142 614.504 276.502 4971.278 8481.36934
Wind Down from Left Span 365.481 -0.875 -319.795
Wind down from Right Span 389.846 0.875 341.115
Wind UP from Left Span -365.481 -0.875 319.795
Wind UP from Right Span -389.846 0.875 -341.115
Total Down 18773.281 409.142 645.014 3178.308 4971.278 2776.140 8733.712
Up 17262.628 3135.669

NH-72A and NH-73 29 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Stability of Foundation

COMB 6: COMB 3 + WL -Wind Dry Case

Hence Design forces will same as Load Combination 5 Long. Moment Trans. Moment
Unit
Load Volume Vertical Load( C.g. of Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MT due to
Loads Weights FL (kN) FT (kN) ML = PxeL ML due to FL MT = PxeT
Factor (m3) P ) kN. Force (m) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) FT
(kN/m3)
Total down 18773.281 409.142 645.014 3178.308 4971.278 2776.140 8733.712
UP 17262.628 3135.669

COMB 7 : DL+SIDL+WL -one Span Dislodege Wind case Left Span Dislodge Long. Moment Trans. Moment
Unit
Load Volume Vertical Load( C.g. of Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MT due to
Loads Weights FL (kN) FT (kN) ML = PxeL ML due to FL MT = PxeT
Factor (m3) P ) kN. Force (m) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) FT
(kN/m3)
Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1 5150.654 0.875 0.000 4506.822 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 1 319.000 0.875 0.000 279.125 0.000
Wearing Course 1 530.636 0.875 0.000 464.306 0.000

Bearing Pedestal : Left Span 32.000 -0.875 -0.625 -28.000 -20.000


Bearing Pedestal : Right Span 24.960 0.875 -0.577 21.840 -14.400
Seismic arrestor 64.541 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Substructure
Pier Cap 1 25 66.994 1674.844 0.000 12.631 273.556 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 137.12
Additional weight of cap 515.039 -0.938 0.000 -482.849 0.000
Pier Shaft 1 25 22.670 566.743 0.000 17.878 269.145 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 115.23
Pile Cap 1 25 144.279 3606.975 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Earth fill on pile cap 1 20 63.998 1279.959 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Wind Load 1 232.171 614.504 276.502 2820.997626 8481.369
Wind down from Right Span 389.846 0.875 341.115
Wind UP from Right Span -389.846 0.875 -341.115
Total Down 14155.197 232.171 645.014 5102.360 2820.998 -34.400 8733.712
UP 13375.505 4420.129

NH-72A and NH-73 30 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Stability of Foundation

COMB 8 : COMB 1 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case


For Substructure Excluding Pier Cap For Pier Cap
Seismic Effect Factor = 1 αh= 0.127 in Longitudinal direction
αh= 0.127 in Longitudinal direction αh= 0.108 In Transverse direction
αh= 0.108 In Transverse direction αv= 0.085 In Vertical Direction
αv= 0.085 In Vertical Direction

Long. Moment Trans. Moment


Unit Fv = 0.3 x C.g. of
Load Volume Vertical Load( FL = αh x P FT = 0.3 x αh Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MLs due to MTs due to
Loads Weights αv x P Force in ML = PxeL MLs due to FL MT = PxeT
Factor (m3) P ) kN. (kN) x P (kN) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) Fv FT
(kN/m3) (kN) Trans. (m)
Superstructure-Left Span
Dead Load 1 2167.969 70.253 55.206 276.516 -0.875 0.000 -1896.973 -48.305 0.000 970.589
SIDL except Wearing Course 1 407.001 13.189 10.364 277.632 -0.875 0.000 -356.126 -9.069 0.000 196.937
Wearing Course 1 468.050 15.167 11.919 277.210 -0.875 0.000 -409.544 -10.429 0.000 220.075

Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1 5150.654 166.906 131.159 276.219 0.875 0.000 4506.822 114.764 0.000 2256.463
SIDL except Wearing Course 1 319.000 10.337 8.123 277.632 0.875 0.000 279.125 7.108 0.000 154.356
Wearing Course 1 530.636 17.195 13.512 277.210 0.875 0.000 464.306 11.823 0.000 249.502

Bearing Pedestal : Left Span 32.000 -0.875 -0.625 -28.000 -20.000


Bearing Pedestal : Right Span 24.960 0.875 -0.577 21.840 -14.400

Seismic Arrestor 64.541 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Substructure
Pier Cap 1 25 66.994 1674.844 213.245 54.273 42.649 273.556 0.000 0.000 0.000 2314.881 0.000 0.000 589.162
Additional weight of cap 515.039 65.576 16.690 13.115 273.556 -0.938 0.000 -482.849 711.860 0.000 181.176
Pier Shaft 1 25 22.670 566.743 72.159 18.365 14.432 269.145 0.000 0.000 0.000 465.065 0.000 0.000 118.364
Pile Cap 1 25 144.279 3606.975 459.249 116.884 91.850 263.850 0.000 0.000 0.000 528.136 0.000 134.416
Earth fill on pile cap 1 20 63.998 1279.959 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 1760.113 0.000 21386.256 0.000
TOTAL 16808.371 2570.342 499.259 392.329 2098.602 25406.198 65.892 -34.400 5071.040
-392.329 -65.892

COMB 9 : COMB 1 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Long. Moment Trans. Moment
Unit Fv = 0.3 x C.g. of
Load Volume Vertical Load( FL = 0.3x αh FT = αh x P Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MLs due to MTs due to
Loads Weights αv x P Force in ML = PxeL MLs due to FL MT = PxeT
Factor (m3) P ) kN. x P (kN) (kN) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) Fv FT
(kN/m3) (kN) Trans. (m)

Superstructure-Left Span
Dead Load 1 2167.969 234.176 55.206 276.516 -0.875 0.000 -1896.973 -48.305 0.000 3235.297
SIDL except Wearing Course 1 407.001 43.963 10.364 277.632 -0.875 0.000 -356.126 -9.069 0.000 656.457
Wearing Course 1 468.050 50.557 11.919 277.210 -0.875 0.000 -409.544 -10.429 0.000 733.582

Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1 5150.654 556.355 131.159 276.219 0.875 0.000 4506.822 114.764 0.000 7521.543
SIDL except Wearing Course 1 319.000 34.457 8.123 277.632 0.875 0.000 279.125 7.108 0.000 514.519
Wearing Course 1 530.636 57.317 13.512 277.210 0.875 0.000 464.306 11.823 0.000 831.674

Bearing Pedestal : Left Span 32.000 -0.875 -0.625 -28.000 -20.000


Bearing Pedestal : Right Span 24.960 0.875 -0.577 21.840 -14.400

Seismic Arrestor 64.541 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Substructure
Pier Cap 1 25 66.994 1674.844 63.974 180.910 42.649 273.556 0.000 0.000 0.000 694.464 0.000 0.000 1963.873
Additional weight of cap 515.039 19.673 55.633 13.115 273.556 -0.938 0.000 -482.849 213.558 0.000 603.920
Pier Shaft 1 25 22.670 566.743 21.648 61.218 14.432 269.145 0.000 0.000 0.000 139.520 0.000 0.000 394.547
Pile Cap 1 25 144.279 3606.975 137.775 389.612 91.850 263.850 0.000 0.000 0.000 158.441 0.000 448.054
Earth fill on pile cap 1 20 63.998 1279.959 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 461.363 0.000 5605.786 0.000
TOTAL 16808.371 704.431 1664.197 392.329 2098.602 6811.769 65.892 -34.400 16903.465
-392.329 -65.892

NH-72A and NH-73 31 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Stability of Foundation

COMB 10 : COMB 2 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case

Unit Fv = 0.3 x C.g. of


Load Volume Vertical Load( FL = αh x P FT = 0.3 x αh Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MLs due to MTs due to
Loads Weights αv x P Force in ML = PxeL MLs due to FL MT = PxeT
Factor (m3) P ) kN. (kN) x P (kN) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) Fv FT
(kN/m3) (kN) Trans. (m)
Forces from Case 8 except
horizontal forces due to 16808.371 810.229 499.259 392.329 2098.602 4019.943 65.892 -34.400 5071.040
superstructure
CWLL from left span 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 278.385 -0.875 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
CWLL(MAX) with Braking
1 241.917 7.839 6.160 278.385 0.875 211.677 5.390 1792.995 122.959
Vertical Reaction
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 1805.653 0.000 21939.590 0.000
Total 17050.287 2615.882 507.099 398.489 2310.279 25959.532 71.282 1758.595 5193.999
-398.489 -71.282

COMB 11 : COMB 2 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case

Unit Fv = 0.3 x C.g. of


Load Volume Vertical Load( FL = 0.3x αh FT = αh x P Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MLs due to MTs due to
Loads Weights αv x P Force in ML = PxeL MLs due to FL MT = PxeT
Factor (m3) P ) kN. x P (kN) (kN) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) Fv FT
(kN/m3) (kN) Trans. (m)
Forces from Case 9 except
horizontal forces due to 16808.371 243.069 1664.197 392.329 2098.602 1205.983 65.892 -34.400 16903.465
superstructure
CWLL from left span 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 278.385 -0.875 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
CWLL(MAX) with Braking
1 241.917 26.131 6.160 278.385 0.875 211.677 5.390 1792.995 409.864
Vertical Reaction
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 506.903 0.000 6159.120 0.000
Total 17050.287 749.971 1690.328 398.489 2310.279 7365.103 71.282 1758.595 17313.329
-398.489 -71.282

COMB 12 : COMB 3 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case

Unit Fv = 0.3 x C.g. of


Load Volume Vertical Load( FL = αh x P FT = 0.3 x αh Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MLs due to MTs due to
Loads Weights αv x P Force in ML = PxeL MLs due to FL MT = PxeT
Factor (m3) P ) kN. (kN) x P (kN) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) Fv FT
(kN/m3) (kN) Trans. (m)
Forces from Case 8 except
horizontal forces due to 16808.371 810.229 499.259 392.329 2098.602 4019.943 65.892 -34.400 5071.040
superstructure
CWLL from left span 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 278.385 -0.875 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
CWLL(MAX) with Braking
1 182.933 5.928 4.658 278.385 0.875 160.066 4.076 2810.540 92.979
Vertical Reaction
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 1805.653 0.000 21939.590 0.000
Total 16991.303 2615.882 505.187 396.987 2258.668 25959.532 69.968 2776.140 5164.019
-396.987 -69.968

COMB 13 : COMB 3 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case

Unit Fv = 0.3 x C.g. of


Load Volume Vertical Load( FL = 0.3x αh FT = αh x P Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MLs due to MTs due to
Loads Weights αv x P Force in ML = PxeL MLs due to FL MT = PxeT
Factor (m3) P ) kN. x P (kN) (kN) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) Fv FT
(kN/m3) (kN) Trans. (m)
Forces from Case 9 except
horizontal forces due to 16808.371 243.069 1664.197 392.329 2098.602 1205.983 65.892 -34.400 16903.465
superstructure
CWLL from left span 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 278.385 -0.875 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
CWLL(MAX) with Braking
1 182.933 19.760 4.658 278.385 160.066 4.076 2810.540 309.931
Vertical Reaction 0.875
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 506.903 0.000 6159.120 0.000
Total 16991.303 749.971 1683.957 396.987 2258.668 7365.103 69.968 2776.140 17213.396
-396.987 -69.968

NH-72A and NH-73 32 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Stability of Foundation

Note: In Seismic Condition , Seismic Effect becomes 50% = 0.5

COMB 14 : DL+SIDL+EQ-L -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Left Span Dislodge Long. Moment Trans. Moment
Unit Fv = 0.3 x C.g. of
Load Volume Vertical Load( FL = αh x P FT = 0.3 x αh Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MLs due to MTs due to
Loads Weights αv x P Force in ML = PxeL MLs due to FL MT = PxeT
Factor 3 (m3) P ) kN. (kN) x P (kN) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) Fv FT
(kN/m ) (kN) Trans. (m)
Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1 5150.654 83.453 65.579 276.219 0.875 0.000 4506.822 57.382 0.000 1128.231
SIDL except Wearing Course 1 319.000 5.169 4.062 277.632 0.875 0.000 279.125 3.554 0.000 77.178
Wearing Course 1 530.636 8.598 6.756 277.210 0.875 0.000 464.306 5.912 0.000 124.751

Bearing Pedestal : Right Span 24.960 0.875 -0.577 21.840 -14.400

Seismic Arrestor 64.541 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Substructure
Pier Cap 1 25 66.994 1674.844 106.623 27.137 21.325 273.556 0.000 0.000 0.000 1157.441 0.000 0.000 294.581
Additional weight of cap 515.039 32.788 8.345 6.558 273.556 -0.938 0.000 -482.849 355.930 0.000 90.588
Pier Shaft 1 25 22.670 566.743 36.080 9.183 7.216 269.145 0.000 0.000 0.000 232.533 0.000 0.000 59.182
Pile Cap 1 25 144.279 3606.975 229.624 58.442 45.925 263.850 0.000 0.000 0.000 264.068 0.000 67.208
Earth fill on pile cap 1 20 63.998 1279.959 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 636.642 0.000 7735.524 0.000
TOTAL 13733.351 1041.757 200.325 157.420 4789.244 9745.496 66.847 -14.400 1841.719
-157.420 -66.847

COMB 15 : DL+SIDL+EQ-T -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Left Span Dislodge Long. Moment Trans. Moment
Unit Fv = 0.3 x C.g. of
Load Volume Vertical Load( FL = 0.3 x αh FT = αh x P Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MLs due to MTs due to
Loads Weights αv x P Force in ML = PxeL MLs due to FL MT = PxeT
Factor 3 (m3) P ) kN. x P (kN) (kN) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) Fv FT
(kN/m ) (kN) Trans. (m)
Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1 5150.654 278.177 65.579 276.219 0.875 0.000 4506.822 57.382 0.000 3760.771
SIDL except Wearing Course 1 319.000 17.229 4.062 277.632 0.875 0.000 279.125 3.554 0.000 257.259
Wearing Course 1 530.636 28.659 6.756 277.210 0.875 0.000 464.306 5.912 0.000 415.837

Bearing Pedestal : Right Span 24.960 0.875 -0.577 21.840 -14.400

Seismic Arrestor 64.541 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Substructure
Pier Cap 1 25 66.994 1674.844 31.987 90.455 21.325 273.556 0.000 0.000 0.000 347.232 0.000 0.000 981.937
Additional weight of cap 515.039 9.836 27.816 6.558 273.556 -0.938 0.000 -482.849 106.779 0.000 301.960
Pier Shaft 1 25 22.670 566.743 10.824 30.609 7.216 269.145 0.000 0.000 0.000 69.760 0.000 0.000 197.273
Pile Cap 1 25 144.279 3606.975 68.887 194.806 45.925 263.850 0.000 0.000 0.000 79.220 0.000 224.027
Earth fill on pile cap 1 20 63.998 1279.959 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 232.171 0.000 2820.998 0.000
TOTAL 13733.351 353.706 667.751 157.420 4789.244 3423.989 66.847 -14.400 6139.065
-157.420 -66.847

NH-72A and NH-73 33 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Stability of Foundation

Centrifugal Force : Normal Case


Centrifugal Force (C.F.) = 1.00 x 0.00 = 0.00 KN
Transverse Moment due to C.F. = 0.000 x ( 278.500 - 262.700 ) = 0.00 kNm

Centrifugal Force : Seismic Case


Centrifugal Force (C.F.) = 1.00 x 0.00 = 0.000 KN
Transverse Moment due to C.F. = 0.000 x ( 278.500 - 262.700 ) = 0.000 kNm

Summary of Forces at Pile Cap Bottom For Stability of Foundation

Resultant
CASE LOAD COMBINATION P (kN) ML (kNm) MT (kNm) FL (kN) FT (kN)
Force

COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case 16808.4 4919.6 -34.4 232.17 0.00 232.17
Normal Case

COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal Dry Case 18018.0 8744.7 1758.6 459.87 0.00 459.87

COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -Normal Dry Case 17723.0 8486.6 2776.1 459.87 0.00 459.87

COMB 4 : DL+SIDL -one Span Dislodege Normal case 13733.4 7610.2 -14.4 232.17 0.00 232.17

COMB 5 : COMB 2 + WL -Normal Dry Case Down 18773.3 8149.6 11509.9 409.14 645.01 763.83

Up 17262.6 8106.9 11509.9


Wind Case

COMB 6: COMB 3 + WL -Wind Dry Case Down 18773.3 8149.6 11509.9 409.14 645.01 763.83

Up 17262.6 8106.9 11509.9

COMB 7 : DL+SIDL+WL -one Span Dislodege Wind case Down 14155.2 7923.4 8699.3 232.17 645.01 685.53

Up 13375.5 7241.1 8699.3

COMB 8 : COMB 1 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 17200.7 27570.7 5036.6 2570.34 499.26 2618.38

Up 16416.0 27438.9 5036.6

COMB 9 : COMB 1 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 17200.7 8976.3 16869.1 704.43 1664.20 1807.15

Up 16416.0 8844.5 16869.1

COMB 10 : COMB 2 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 17448.8 28341.1 6952.6 2615.88 507.10 2664.58

Up 16651.8 28198.5 6952.6


Seismic Case

COMB 11 : COMB 2 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 17448.8 9746.7 19071.9 749.97 1690.33 1849.23

Up 16651.8 9604.1 19071.9

COMB 12 : COMB 3 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 17388.3 28288.2 7940.2 2615.88 505.19 2664.22

Up 16594.3 28148.2 7940.2

COMB 13 : COMB 3 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 17388.3 9693.7 19989.5 749.97 1683.96 1843.41

Up 16594.3 9553.8 19989.5

COMB 14 : DL+SIDL+EQ-L -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Down 13890.8 14601.6 1827.32 1041.76 200.33 1060.84

Up 13575.9 14467.9 1827.32

COMB 15 : DL+SIDL+EQ-T -one Span Dislodege Seismic caseDown 13890.8 8280.1 6124.66 353.71 667.75 755.64

Up 13575.9 8146.4 6124.66

NH-72A and NH-73 34 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Stability of Foundation

Calculation of Reaction at Pile

Arrangement of Vertical Pile Shaft


Nos. of Piles = 8 Nos. 0.75 1.8 1.8 0.75 PILE CAP

Pile No rLs rTs


1 1.800 5.400 0.75
2 1.800 1.800
3 1.800 -1.800 5 1
4 1.800 -5.400 12.30
5 -1.800 5.400 3.60 PILE
6 -1.800 1.800 L S 6
7 -1.800 -1.800 e p 2 R S
8 -1.800 -5.400 f a i p
t
9 0.000 0.000 t n 3.60 g a
10 0.000 0.000 h n
11 0.000 0.000
12 0.000 0.000 S rLs^2 = 25.920 m^2
13 0.000 0.000 S rTs^2 = 129.600 m^2
14 0.000 0.000 7 3
15 0.000 0.000
3.60

8 4
Load on each pile = P + MLs .rLs + MTs .rTs
n S rL^2 S rT^2 0.75

5.10

NH-72A and NH-73 35 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Stability of Foundation

LOADS ON EACH PILE

Design Forces at Bottom of Cap Load on Each Pile Top


CASE LOAD COMBINATION P ML MT P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8
Normal Case

COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case 16808 4920 -34 2441 2442 2443 2444 1758 1759 1760 1761
COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal Dry Case 18018 8745 1759 2933 2884 2835 2786 1718 1669 1621 1572
COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -Normal Dry Case 17723 8487 2776 2920 2843 2766 2689 1742 1665 1587 1510
COMB 4 : DL+SIDL -one Span Dislodege Normal case 13733 7610 -14 2245 2245 2245 2246 1188 1188 1188 1189
COMB 5 : COMB 2 + WL -Normal Dry Case Down 18773 8150 11510 3392 3072 2753 2433 2260 1941 1621 1301
Wind Case

Up 17263 8107 11510 3200 2881 2561 2241 2074 1755 1435 1115
COMB 6: COMB 3 + WL -Wind Dry Case Down 18773 8150 11510 3392 3072 2753 2433 2260 1941 1621 1301
Up 17263 8107 11510 3200 2881 2561 2241 2074 1755 1435 1115
COMB 7 : DL+SIDL+WL -one Span Dislodege Wind case Down 14155 7923 8699 2682 2440 2199 1957.2 1582 1340 1098 857
Up 13376 7241 8699 2537 2296 2054 1812.3 1532 1290 1048 807
COMB 8 : COMB 1 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 17201 27571 5037 4275 4135 3995 3855 445 305 166 26
Up 16416 27439 5037 4167 4027 3888 3748 356 216 77 -63
COMB 9 : COMB 1 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 17201 8976 16869 3476 3008 2539 2071 2230 1761 1292 824
Up 16416 8844 16869 3369 2900 2432 1963 2141 1672 1204 735
COMB 10 : COMB 2 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 17449 28341 6953 4439 4246 4053 3860 503 310 116 -77
Up 16652 28199 6953 4329 4136 3943 3750 413 220 27 -166
Seismic Case

COMB 11 : COMB 2 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 17449 9747 19072 3653 3123 2593 2063 2299 1769 1239 710
Up 16652 9604 19072 3543 3013 2484 1954 2209 1679 1150 620
COMB 12 : COMB 3 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 17388 28288 7940 4469 4248 4028 3807 540 319 99 -122
Up 16594 28148 7940 4360 4139 3919 3698 450 230 9 -211
COMB 13 : COMB 3 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 17388 9694 19990 3680 3124 2569 2014 2333 1778 1223 667
Up 16594 9554 19990 3571 3015 2460 1905 2244 1688 1133 578
COMB 14 : DL+SIDL+EQ-L -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Down 13891 14602 1827 2826 2776 2725 2674 798 748 697 646
Up 13576 14468 1827 2778 2727 2676 2626 768 718 667 616
COMB 15 : DL+SIDL+EQ-T -one Span Dislodege Seismic caseDown 13891 8280 6125 2567 2396 2226 2056 1417 1246 1076 906
Up 13576 8146 6125 2518 2348 2178 2008 1386 1216 1046 876

NH-72A and NH-73 36 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Stability of Foundation

Load on Each Pile Top


Check For Check For Check For
Max Min Max
CASE LOAD COMBINATION Vertical Min Reaction Uplift Resultant Force Max Horizontal
Reaction Reaction Reaction
Capacity Capacity (kN) Capacity
Normal Case

COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case 2444 1758 29


COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal Dry Case 2933 1572 57
2933 SAFE 1188 SAFE 57 SAFE
COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -Normal Dry Case 2920 1510 57
COMB 4 : DL+SIDL -one Span Dislodege Normal case 2246 1188 29
COMB 5 : COMB 2 + WL -Normal Dry Case Down 3392 1301 95
Wind Case

Up 3200 1115
COMB 6: COMB 3 + WL -Wind Dry Case Down 3392 1301 95
3392 SAFE 807 SAFE 95
Up 3200 1115
COMB 7 : DL+SIDL+WL -one Span Dislodege Wind case Down 2682 857 86
Up 2537 807
COMB 8 : COMB 1 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 4275 26 327
Up 4167 -63
COMB 9 : COMB 1 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 3476 824 226
Up 3369 735
COMB 10 : COMB 2 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 4439 -77 333
Up 4329 -166
Seismic Case

COMB 11 : COMB 2 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 3653 710 231
3543 620 4469 SAFE -211 SAFE 333
COMB 12 : COMB 3 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 4469 -122 333
4360 -211
COMB 13 : COMB 3 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 3680 667 230
3571 578
COMB 14 : DL+SIDL+EQ-L -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Down 2826 646 133
Up 2778 616
COMB 15 : DL+SIDL+EQ-T -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Down 2567 906 94
Up 2518 876

As this pier is in vicinity of rail track, the approximate 15% load on pile to cater the load from rail has been considered

Hence Maximum Reaction of the pile = 1.15 x 2933 KN = 3372.70 KN SAFE Normal Case

Max Rection on Pile = 3541.34 Normal Case 5 % Extra load has been considered
= 4692.27 Seismic Case

NH-72A and NH-73 37 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Length of Fixity

Computation for length of fixity As per IS : 2911 (part 1/ sec2)

Le = Embedded length of pile below Pile cap bottom = 262.700 - 236.700 = 26.000 m
Pile cap
bottom MSL
Exposed length L1 = 262.700 0.000 = 0.00 m 0 cm

For 1.2 m dia piles


I = p x 120.00 ^4 = 10178760 cm^4
64

Material Properties:

2
Grade of Concrete = M 35 fck= 35.00 N/mm
2
Grade of Steel = Fe 500 fyk= 500.00 N/mm
2 2
E = 29580.40 N/mm = 301533 Kg/cm

2
E = 5000 x 35 = 29580 N/mm^2 = 301533 Kg/cm

E is the Young's modulus of the pile material in kg/cm^2


I is the Moment of Inertia of the pile cross section in cm^4
Length of Fixity as per (Appendix C) cl. 5.5.2 of IS :2911(Part I/Sec 2)-2010

For Sandy Strata


N = 19.000
nh = 0.269 Kg/cm3 (Medium Sand-Dry)

T = 4.09 m

Avg. Cohesion, C = 0.84 Kg/cm2 As per Geotechnical Report


3
Unconfined Compressive strength = 1.68 Kg/cm
K1 = 30.00 Kg/cm2 clayey
K = K1 / 1.5 x 0.3 / D = 5.000
Stiffnes Factor , R = 4.087

Governing Value of T/R = 4.09 (Medium Sand-Dry)


For Rock Strata

Pile cap bottom level = 262.70 m

Rock level = 0.00 m

Length of pile in soil, Ls = 262.70 m

Ls/R = 64.27 > 4

Q Q
2.3 FREE HEAD PILE

L1 = L1
FIXED HEAD PILE

2.1 Le
Le

1.9 FOR PILES IN SANDS


AND NORMALLY LOADED CLAYS
Lf /R OR Lf/T

1.7

1.5
FOR PILES IN PRELOADED CLAYS

1.3
0 2 4 6 8 10
L1 /R OR L1 /T

NH-72A and NH-73 38 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Length of Fixity

For L1 /T OR L1/R = 0.00 (Medium Sand-Dry)


Hence from above Fig.

Lf/T = 2.190 For Fixed Head Pile

Lf = 2.1900 x 4.09 = 8.95 m

Governing Lf = 8.95 m
Lf = 8.952 x 100.00 = 895.16 cm

Equivalent length of cantilever = L1+ Lf = 0.00 + 895.16 = 8.95 m


cm cm
A = p x 120.00 ^2 = 11309.7 cm^2
4

Least radius of gyration = I = 30 cm


A

Effective length = 895.16 cm

Resultant Horizontal Force= 57 KN


Deflection at Pile Tip = 1.120 mm
Deflection at Scouring Level = 1.120 mm
< 12mm OK

NH-72A and NH-73 39 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Forces For Found. Design

Calculation of Forces For Foundation Design

Pile Cap bottom Lvl = 262.70 m Bearing top Level = 274.851 m

COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case


Unit Vertical
Volume Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc.
Loads Load Factor Weights Load( P ) FL (kN) FT (kN) ML = PxeL MT = PxeT
(m3) (eL) (m) (eT) (m)
(kN/m3) kN.

Superstructure-Left Span
Dead Load 1.35 2926.758 -0.875 0.000 -2560.913 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 549.451 -0.875 0.000 -480.770 0.000
Wearing Course 1.75 819.088 -0.875 0.000 -716.702 0.000
Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1.35 6953.383 0.875 0.000 6084.210 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 430.650 0.875 0.000 376.819 0.000
Wearing Course 1.75 928.613 0.875 0.000 812.536 0.000

Bearing Pedestal : Left Span 1.35 25 1.280 43.200 -0.875 -0.625 -37.800 -27.000
Bearing Pedestal : Right Span 1.35 25 0.998 33.696 0.875 -0.577 29.484 -19.440

Seismic arrestor: Left Span


Long. Arrestor 1.35 25 1.190 40.163 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Transverse arrestor 1.35 25 0.574 19.379 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Seismic arrestor: Right Span
Long. Arrestor 1.35 25 0.000 0.000 0.875 0.000 0.000 0.000
Transverse arrestor 1.35 25 0.817 27.589 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Substructure
Pier Cap 1.35 25 66.994 2261.039 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Additional weight of cap 1.35 25 20.602 695.303 -0.938 0.000 -651.846 0.000
Pier Shaft 1.35 25 22.670 765.103 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Pile Cap 1.35 25 144.279 4869.416 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Earth fill on pile cap 1.35 20 63.998 1727.945 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 232.171 0.000 2820.998 0.000
Total 23090.775 232.171 0.000 5676.016 -46.440

COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal Dry Case


Unit Vertical
Volume Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc.
Loads Load Factor Weights Load( P ) FL (kN) FT (kN) ML = PxeL MT = PxeT
3 (m3) (eL) (m) (eT) (m)
(kN/m ) kN.
Forces from Case 1 except
horizontal forces due to 23090.775 0.000 0.000 2855.018 -46.440
superstructure
CWLL from left span 1.5 0.00 -0.875 0.000 0.000
CWLL(MAX) with Braking
1.5 1814.376 0.875 1587.579 2689.492
Vertical Reaction
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 573.721 0.000 6971.001 0.000
Total 24905.151 573.721 0.000 11413.598 2643.052

NH-72A and NH-73 40 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Forces For Found. Design

COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -Normal Dry Case


Unit Vertical
Volume Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc.
Loads Load Factor Weights Load( P ) FL (kN) FT (kN) ML = PxeL MT = PxeT
3 (m3) (eL) (m) (eT) (m)
(kN/m ) kN.
Forces from Case 1 except
horizontal forces due to 23090.775 0.000 0.000 2855.018 -46.440
superstructure
CWLL from left span 1.5 0.00 -0.875 0.000 0.000
CWLL(MAX) with Braking
1.5 1371.995 0.875 1200.496 4215.811
Vertical Reaction
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 573.721 0.000 6971.001 0.000
Total 24462.770 573.721 0.000 11026.515 4169.371

COMB 4 : DL+SIDL -one Span Dislodege Normal case


Unit Vertical
Volume Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc.
Loads Load Factor Weights Load( P ) FL (kN) FT (kN) ML = PxeL MT = PxeT
(m3) (eL) (m) (eT) (m)
(kN/m3) kN.
Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1.35 6953.383 0.875 0.000 6084.210 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 430.650 0.875 0.000 376.819 0.000
Wearing Course 1.75 928.613 0.875 0.000 812.536 0.000

Bearing Pedestal : Right Span 1.35 25 0.998 33.696 0.875 -0.577 29.484 -19.440

Seismic arrestor 1.35 27.589 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Substructure
Pier Cap 1.35 25 66.994 2261.039 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Additional weight of cap 1.35 25 20.602 695.303 -0.938 0.000 -651.846 0.000
Pier Shaft 1.35 25 22.670 765.103 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Pile Cap 1.35 25 144.279 4869.416 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Earth fill on pile cap 1.35 20 63.998 1727.945 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 232.171 0.000 2820.998 0.000
Total 18692.736 232.171 0.000 9472.200 -19.440

NH-72A and NH-73 41 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Forces For Found. Design

COMB 5 : COMB 2 + WL -Normal Dry Case Long. Moment Trans. Moment


Unit Vertical Transv.
Volume C.g. of Long. Ecc. ML due to MT due to
Loads Load Factor Weights Load( P ) FL (kN) FT (kN) Ecc. (eT) ML = PxeL MT = PxeT
(m3) Force (m) (eL) (m) FL FT
(kN/m3) kN. (m)

Superstructure-Left Span
Dead Load 1.35 2926.758 -0.875 0.000 -2560.913 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 549.451 -0.875 0.000 -480.770 0.000
Wearing Course 1.75 819.088 -0.875 0.000 -716.702 0.000
Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1.35 6953.383 0.875 0.000 6084.210 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 430.650 0.875 0.000 376.819 0.000
Wearing Course 1.75 928.613 0.875 0.000 812.536 0.000

Bearing Pedestal : Left Span 1.35 25 1.280 43.200 -0.875 -0.625 -37.800 -27.000
Bearing Pedestal : Right Span 1.35 25 0.998 33.696 0.875 -0.577 29.484 -19.440

Seismic arrestor 1.35 87.130 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Substructure
Pier Cap 1.35 2261.039 0.000 11.368 273.56 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 123.40
Additional weight of cap 1.35 25 20.602 695.303 -0.938 0.000 -651.846 0.000
Pier Shaft 1.35 765.103 0.000 16.091 269.15 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 103.70
Pile Cap 1.35 4869.416 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Earth fill on pile cap 1.35 1727.945 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Wind Load 0.9 391.445 553.054 276.50 4756.250 7633.232
Wind Down from Left Span 328.932 -0.875 -287.816
Wind down from Right Span 350.861 0.875 307.004
Wind UP from Left Span -328.932 -0.875 287.816
Wind UP from Right Span -350.861 0.875 -307.004
Total Down 23770.568 391.445 580.512 2874.206 4756.250 -46.440 7860.341
Up 22410.981 2835.830

COMB 6: COMB 3 + WL -Wind Dry Case

Long. Moment Trans. Moment


Unit Vertical Transv.
Volume C.g. of Long. Ecc. ML due to MT due to
Loads Load Factor Weights Load( P ) FL (kN) FT (kN) Ecc. (eT) ML = PxeL MT = PxeT
(m3) Force (m) (eL) (m) FL FT
(kN/m3) kN. (m)
Total down 23770.568 391.445 580.512 2874.206 4756.250 -46.440 7860.341
UP 22410.981 2835.830

NH-72A and NH-73 42 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Forces For Found. Design

COMB 7 : DL+SIDL+WL -one Span Dislodege Wind case Left Span Dislodge Long. Moment Trans. Moment
Unit Vertical Transv.
Volume C.g. of Long. Ecc. ML due to MT due to
Loads Load Factor Weights Load( P ) FL (kN) FT (kN) Ecc. (eT) ML = PxeL MT = PxeT
3 (m3) Force (m) (eL) (m) FL FT
(kN/m ) kN. (m)
Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1.35 6953.383 0.875 0.000 6084.210 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 430.650 0.875 0.000 376.819 0.000
Wearing Course 1.75 928.613 0.875 0.000 812.536 0.000

Bearing Pedestal : Left Span 1.35 25 1.280 43.200 -0.875 -0.625 -37.800 -27.000
Bearing Pedestal : Right Span 1.35 25 0.998 33.696 0.875 -0.577 29.484 -19.440

Seismic arrestor 1.35 87.130 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000


Substructure
Pier Cap 1.35 25 66.994 2261.039 0.000 11.368 273.56 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 123.40
Additional weight of cap 1.35 25 20.602 695.303 -0.938 0.000 -651.846 0.000
Pier Shaft 1.35 25 22.670 765.103 0.000 16.091 269.15 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 103.70
Pile Cap 1.35 25 144.279 4869.416 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Earth fill on pile cap 1.35 20 63.998 1727.945 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Wind Load 0.9 232.171 553.054 276.502 2820.998 7633.232
Wind down from Right Span 350.861 0.875 307.004
Wind UP from Right Span -350.861 0.875 -307.004
Total Down 19146.339 232.171 580.512 6920.406 2820.998 -46.440 7860.341
UP 18444.617 6306.399

COMB 8 : COMB 1 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case For Substructure Excluding Pier Cap For Pier Cap *Seismic coeff. are modified with seismic effect factor
αh= 0.191 in Longitudinal direction αh= 0.191 in Longitudinal direction
Seismic Effect Factor = 1.50 αh= 0.162 In Transverse direction αh= 0.162 In Transverse direction
αv= 0.127 In Vertical Direction αv= 0.127 In Vertical Direction

Long. Moment Trans. Moment


Unit Vertical FT = 0.3 x C.g. of Transv.
Volume FL = αh x Fv = 0.3 x Long. Ecc. MLs due to MLs due MT = MTs due
Loads Load Factor Weights Load( P ) αh x P Force in Ecc. (eT) ML = PxeL
(m3) P (kN) αv x P (kN) (eL) (m) FL to Fv PxeT to FT
(kN/m3) kN. (kN) Trans. (m) (m)
Superstructure-Left Span
Dead Load 1.35 2926.758 105.379 82.809 276.516 -0.875 0.000 -2560.913 -72.458 0.000 1455.884
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 549.451 19.783 15.546 277.632 -0.875 0.000 -480.770 -13.603 0.000 295.405
Wearing Course 1.75 819.088 22.751 17.878 277.210 -0.875 0.000 -716.702 -15.643 0.000 330.112

Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1.35 6953.383 250.360 196.738 276.219 0.875 0.000 6084.210 172.146 0.000 3384.694
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 430.650 15.506 12.185 277.632 0.875 0.000 376.819 10.662 0.000 231.533
Wearing Course 1.75 928.613 25.793 20.269 277.210 0.875 0.000 812.536 17.735 0.000 374.253

Bearing Pedestal : Left Span 1.35 25 1.280 43.200 -0.875 -0.625 -37.800 -27.000
Bearing Pedestal : Right Span 1.35 25 0.998 33.696 0.875 -0.577 29.484 -19.440

Seismic arrestor 1.35 87.130 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Substructure
Pier Cap 1.35 25 66.994 2261.039 479.801 81.410 63.974 273.556 0.000 0.000 0.000 5208.483 0.000 0.000 883.743
Additional weight of cap 1.35 25 20.602 695.303 147.546 25.035 19.673 273.556 -0.938 0.000 -651.846 1601.685 0.000 271.764
Pier Shaft 1.35 25 22.670 765.103 162.358 27.548 21.648 269.145 0.000 0.000 0.000 1046.397 0.000 0.000 177.546
Pile Cap 1.35 25 144.279 4869.416 1033.309 175.325 137.775 263.850 0.000 0.000 0.000 1188.306 0.000 201.624
Earth fill on pile cap 1.35 20 63.998 1727.945 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 2524.084 0.000 30668.885 0.000
TOTAL 23090.775 4347.099 748.889 588.493 2855.018 39713.756 98.838 -46.440 7606.559
-588.493 -98.838

NH-72A and NH-73 43 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Forces For Found. Design

COMB 9 : COMB 1 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Long. Moment Trans. Moment
Unit Vertical FL = 0.3x C.g. of Transv.
Volume FT = αh x Fv = 0.3 x Long. Ecc. MLs due to MLs due MT = MTs due
Loads Load Factor Weights Load( P ) αh x P Force in Ecc. (eT) ML = PxeL
(m3) P (kN) αv x P (kN) (eL) (m) FL to Fv PxeT to FT
(kN/m3) kN. (kN) Trans. (m) (m)

Superstructure-Left Span
Dead Load 1.35 2926.758 351.264 82.809 276.516 -0.875 0.000 -2560.913 -72.458 0.000 4852.945
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 549.451 65.944 15.546 277.632 -0.875 0.000 -480.770 -13.603 0.000 984.685
Wearing Course 1.75 819.088 75.836 17.878 277.210 -0.875 0.000 -716.702 -15.643 0.000 1100.374
Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1.35 6953.383 834.532 196.738 276.219 0.875 0.000 6084.210 172.146 0.000 11282.314
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 430.650 51.686 12.185 277.632 0.875 0.000 376.819 10.662 0.000 771.778
Wearing Course 1.75 928.613 85.976 20.269 277.210 0.875 0.000 812.536 17.735 0.000 1247.511

Bearing Pedestal : Left Span 1.35 25 1.280 43.200 -0.875 -0.625 -37.800 -27.000
Bearing Pedestal : Right Span 1.35 25 0.998 33.696 0.875 -0.577 29.484 -19.440

Seismic arrestor 1.35 87.130 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Substructure
Pier Cap 1.35 25 66.994 2261.039 143.940 271.366 63.974 273.556 0.000 0.000 0.000 1562.545 0.000 0.000 2945.810
Additional weight of cap 1.35 25.00 20.60 695.303 44.264 83.449 19.673 273.556 -0.938 0.000 -651.846 480.506 0.000 905.880
Pier Shaft 1.35 25 22.670 765.103 48.707 91.826 21.648 269.145 0.000 0.000 0.000 313.919 0.000 0.000 591.820
Pile Cap 1.35 25 144.279 4869.416 309.993 584.418 137.775 263.850 0.000 0.000 0.000 356.492 0.000 672.081
Earth fill on pile cap 1.35 20 63.998 1727.945 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 575.958 0.000 6998.181 0.000
TOTAL 23090.775 1122.863 2496.296 588.493 2855.018 9711.642 98.838 -46.440 25355.198
-588.493 -98.838

COMB 10 : COMB 2 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case

Unit Vertical FT = 0.3 x C.g. of Transv.


Volume FL = αh x Fv = 0.3 x Long. Ecc. MLs due to MLs due MT = MTs due
Loads Load Factor Weights Load( P ) αh x P Force in Ecc. (eT) ML = PxeL
(m3) P (kN) αv x P (kN) (eL) (m) FL to Fv PxeT to FT
(kN/m3) kN. (kN) Trans. (m) (m)
Forces from Case 8 except
horizontal forces due to 23090.775 1823.014 748.889 588.493 2855.018 9044.871 98.838 -46.440 7606.559
superstructure
CWLL from left span 0.000 0.000 0.000 278.385 -0.875 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
CWLL(MAX) with Braking
241.917 11.759 9.240 278.385 0.875 211.677 8.085 358.599 184.439
Vertical Reaction
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 2569.624 0.000 31222.219 0.000
Total 23332.692 4392.639 760.648 597.734 3066.695 40267.089 106.924 312.159 7790.998
-597.734 -106.924

NH-72A and NH-73 44 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Forces For Found. Design

COMB 11 : COMB 2 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case

Unit Vertical FL = 0.3x C.g. of Transv.


Volume FT = αh x Fv = 0.3 x Long. Ecc. MLs due to MLs due MT = MTs due
Loads Load Factor Weights Load( P ) αh x P Force in Ecc. (eT) ML = PxeL
(m3) P (kN) αv x P (kN) (eL) (m) FL to Fv PxeT to FT
(kN/m3) kN. (kN) Trans. (m) (m)
Forces from Case 9 except
horizontal forces due to 23090.775 546.904 2496.296 588.493 2855.018 2713.461 98.838 -46.440 25355.198
superstructure
CWLL from left span 0.000 0.000 0.000 278.385 -0.875 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
CWLL(MAX) with Braking
241.917 39.196 9.240 278.385 0.875 211.677 8.085 358.599 614.796
Vertical Reaction
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 621.498 0.000 7551.514 0.000
Total 23332.692 1168.403 2535.493 597.734 3066.695 10264.976 106.924 312.159 25969.994
-597.734 -106.924
COMB 12 : COMB 3 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case

Unit Vertical FT = 0.3 x C.g. of Transv.


Volume FL = αh x Fv = 0.3 x Long. Ecc. MLs due to MLs due MT = MTs due
Loads Load Factor Weights Load( P ) αh x P Force in Ecc. (eT) ML = PxeL
(m3) P (kN) αv x P (kN) (eL) (m) FL to Fv PxeT to FT
(kN/m3) kN. (kN) Trans. (m) (m)
Forces from Case 8 except
horizontal forces due to 23090.775 1823.014 748.889 588.493 2855.018 9044.871 98.838 -46.440 7606.559
superstructure
CWLL from left span 0.000 0.000 0.000 278.385 -0.875 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
CWLL(MAX) with Braking
182.933 8.892 6.987 278.385 0.875 160.066 6.114 562.108 139.469
Vertical Reaction
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 2569.624 0.000 31222.219 0.000
Total 23273.707 4392.639 757.781 595.481 3015.084 40267.089 104.952 515.668 7746.028
-595.481 -104.952
COMB 13 : COMB 3 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case

Unit Vertical FL = 0.3x C.g. of Transv.


Volume FT = αh x Fv = 0.3 x Long. Ecc. MLs due to MLs due MT = MTs due
Loads Load Factor Weights Load( P ) αh x P Force in Ecc. (eT) ML = PxeL
(m3) P (kN) αv x P (kN) (eL) (m) FL to Fv PxeT to FT
(kN/m3) kN. (kN) Trans. (m) (m)
Forces from Case 9 except
horizontal forces due to 23090.775 546.904 2496.296 588.493 2855.018 2713.461 98.838 -46.440 25355.198
superstructure
CWLL from left span 0.000 0.000 0.000 278.385 -0.875 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
CWLL(MAX) with Braking
182.933 29.640 6.987 278.385 0.875 160.066 6.114 562.108 464.897
Vertical Reaction
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 621.498 0.000 7551.514 0.000
Total 23273.707 1168.403 2525.936 595.481 3015.084 10264.976 104.952 515.668 25820.095
-595.481 -104.952

NH-72A and NH-73 45 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Forces For Found. Design

COMB 14 : DL+SIDL+EQ-L -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Left Span Dislodge
For Substructure Excluding Pier Cap For Pier Cap
Seismic Effect Factor = 0.75 αh= 0.095 in Longitudinal direction αh= 0.080 in Longitudinal direction
αh= 0.081 In Transverse direction αh= 0.068 In Transverse direction
αv= 0.064 In Vertical Direction αv= 0.053 In Vertical Direction
Long. Moment Trans. Moment
Unit Vertical FT = 0.3 x C.g. of Transv.
Volume FL = αh x Fv = 0.3 x Long. Ecc. MLs due to MLs due MT = MTs due
Loads Load Factor Weights Load( P ) αh x P Force in Ecc. (eT) ML = PxeL
(m3) P (kN) αv x P (kN) (eL) (m) FL to Fv PxeT to FT
(kN/m3) kN. (kN) Trans. (m) (m)
Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1.35 6953.383 149.398 132.798 276.219 0.875 0.000 6084.210 116.198 0.000 2019.760
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 430.650 12.337 8.225 277.632 0.875 0.000 376.819 7.197 0.000 184.218
Wearing Course 1.75 928.613 26.602 17.735 277.210 0.875 0.000 812.536 15.518 0.000 386.002
Bearing Pedestal : Right Span 1.35 25 0.998 33.696 0.875 -0.577 29.484 -19.440
Seismic arrestor 1.35 87.130 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Substructure
Pier Cap 1.35 25 66.994 2261.039 179.925 45.793 35.985 273.556 0.000 0.000 0.000 1953.181 0.000 0.000 497.105
Additional weight of cap 1.35 25 20.60 695.303 55.330 14.082 11.066 273.556 -0.94 0.00 -651.846 600.632 0.000 152.867
Pier Shaft 1.35 25 22.670 765.103 73.061 18.595 14.612 269.145 0.000 0.000 0.000 470.879 0.000 0.000 119.844
Pile Cap 1.35 25 144.279 4869.416 464.989 118.345 92.998 263.850 0.000 0.000 0.000 534.737 0.000 136.096
Earth fill on pile cap 1.35 20 63.998 1727.945 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 954.964 0.000 11603.286 0.000
TOTAL 18752.278 1728.269 385.152 313.419 6651.203 15162.716 138.913 -19.440 3495.893
-313.419 -138.913

COMB 15 : DL+SIDL+EQ-T -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Left Span Dislodge Long. Moment Trans. Moment
Unit Vertical FL = 0.3 x C.g. of Transv.
Volume FT = αh x Fv = 0.3 x Long. Ecc. MLs due to MLs due MT = MTs due
Loads Load Factor Weights Load( P ) αh x P Force in Ecc. (eT) ML = PxeL
3 (m3) P (kN) αv x P (kN) (eL) (m) FL to Fv PxeT to FT
(kN/m ) kN. (kN) Trans. (m) (m)
Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1.35 6953.383 663.991 132.798 276.219 0.875 0.000 6084.210 116.198 0.000 8976.712
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 430.650 41.124 8.225 277.632 0.875 0.000 376.819 7.197 0.000 614.061
Wearing Course 1.75 928.613 88.675 17.735 277.210 0.875 0.000 812.536 15.518 0.000 1286.672

Bearing Pedestal : Right Span 1.35 25 0.998 33.696 0.875 -0.577 29.484 -19.440

Seismic arrestor 1.35 87.130 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Substructure
Pier Cap 1.35 25 66.994 2261.039 53.978 152.643 35.985 273.556 0.000 0.000 0.000 585.954 0.000 0.000 1657.018
Additional weight of cap 1.35 25.00 20.602 695.303 16.599 46.940 11.066 273.556 -0.938 0.000 -651.846 180.190 0.000 509.557
Pier Shaft 1.35 25 22.670 765.103 21.918 61.983 14.612 269.145 0.000 0.000 0.000 141.264 0.000 0.000 399.479
Pile Cap 1.35 25 144.279 4869.416 139.497 394.482 92.998 263.850 0.000 0.000 0.000 160.421 0.000 453.655
Earth fill on pile cap 1.35 20 63.998 1727.945 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 232.171 0.000 2820.998 0.000
TOTAL 18752.278 464.163 1449.837 313.419 6651.203 3888.826 138.913 -19.440 13897.154
-313.419 -138.913

NH-72A and NH-73 46 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Forces For Found. Design

Centrifugal Force : Normal Case


Centrifugal Force (C.F.) = 1.50 x 0.00 = 0.00 KN
Transverse Moment due to C.F. = 0.000 x ( 278.500 - 262.700 ) = 0.00 kNm

Centrifugal Force : Seismic Case


Centrifugal Force (C.F.) = 1.00 x 0.00 = 0.000 KN
Transverse Moment due to C.F. = 0.000 x ( 278.500 - 262.700 ) = 0.000 kNm

Summary of Forces For Design of Foundation

Resultant
CASE LOAD COMBINATION P (kN) ML (kNm) MT (kNm) FL (kN) FT (kN) Horizontal
Force

COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case 23091 5676 -46 232 0 232


Normal Case

COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal Dry Case 24905 11414 2643 574 0 574

COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -Normal Dry Case 24463 11027 4169 574 0 574

COMB 4 : DL+SIDL -one Span Dislodege Normal case 18693 9472 -19 232 0 232

COMB 5 : COMB 2 + WL -Normal Dry Case Down 23771 7630 7814 391 581 700

Up 22411 7592 7814


Wind Case

COMB 6: COMB 3 + WL -Wind Dry Case Down 23771 7630 7814 391 581 700

Up 22411 7592 7814

COMB 7 : DL+SIDL+WL -one Span Dislodege Wind case Down 19146 9741 7814 232 581 625

Up 18445 9127 7814

COMB 8 : COMB 1 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 23679 42668 7560 4347 749 4411

Up 22502 42470 7560

COMB 9 : COMB 1 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 23679 12665 25309 1123 2496 2737

Up 22502 12468 25309

COMB 10 : COMB 2 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 23930 43441 8103 4393 761 4458

Up 22735 43227 8103


Seismic Case

COMB 11 : COMB 2 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 23930 13439 26282 1168 2535 2792

Up 22735 13225 26282

COMB 12 : COMB 3 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 23869 43387 8262 4393 758 4458

Up 22678 43177 8262

COMB 13 : COMB 3 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 23869 13385 26336 1168 2526 2783

Up 22678 13175 26336

COMB 14 : DL+SIDL+EQ-L -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Down 19066 21953 3476 1728 385 1771

Up 18439 21675 3476 0

COMB 15 : DL+SIDL+EQ-T -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Down 19066 10679 13878 464 1450 1522

Up 18439 10401 13878 0

NH-72A and NH-73 47 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Forces For Found. Design

Seismic Effect on Pile Shaft


length of pile = 8.952 m
Long. Trans.
Forces Seismic Seismic
Load Factor = 1.50 case Case
3
Unit weight = 25 kN/m P 380 379.65 KN
3
Volume of single pile = 10.124 m FL 67.10 20.13 KN
FT 17.08 56.92 KN
Average
Resultant FR 69.237 60.378 KN
Seismic Coeff. Calculation at 30.000 m at 8.952 m Coeff
αh= = 0.191 0.0955 0.1625 0.177 Fv 13.420 13.420 KN
αh= = 0.162 0.0810 0.1379 0.150
αv= = 0.127 0.0637 0.1083 0.118

Calculation of Reaction at Pile

Arrangement of Vertical Pile Shaft


Nos. of Piles = 8 Nos.

Pile No rLs rTs S rLs^2 = 25.920 m^2


1 1.8 5.4
2 1.8 1.8 S rTs^2 = 129.600 m^2
3 1.8 -1.8
4 1.8 -5.4
5 -1.8 5.4 Load on each pile = P + MLs .rLs + MTs .rTs
6 -1.8 1.8 n S rL^2 S rT^2
7 -1.8 -1.8
8 -1.8 -5.4
LOADS ON EACH PILE

NH-72A and NH-73 48 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Forces For Found. Design

Design Forces at Bottom of Cap Load on Each Pile Top


CASE LOAD COMBINATION P ML MT P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8
Normal Case
COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case 23091 5676 -46 3279 3280 3281 3282 2490 2492 2493 2494
COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal Dry Case 24905 11414 2643 4016 3942 3869 3796 2431 2357 2284 2210
COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -Normal Dry Case 24463 11027 4169 3997 3881 3766 3650 2466 2350 2234 2118
COMB 4 : DL+SIDL -one Span Dislodege Normal case 18693 9472 -19 2994 2994 2995 2995 1678 1679 1679 1680
COMB 5 : COMB 2 + WL -Normal Dry Case Down 23771 7630 7814 3827 3610 3393 3176 2767 2550 2333 2116
Wind Case

Up 22411 7592 7814 3654 3437 3220 3003 2600 2383 2166 1949
COMB 6: COMB 3 + WL -Wind Dry Case Down 23771 7630 7814 3827 3610 3393 3176 2767 2550 2333 2116
Up 22411 7592 7814 3654 3437 3220 3003 2600 2383 2166 1949
COMB 7 : DL+SIDL+WL -one Span Dislodege Wind case Down 19146 9741 7814 3395 3178 2961 2744 2042 1825 1608 1391
Up 18445 9127 7814 3265 3048 2831 2614 1997 1780 1563 1346
COMB 8 : COMB 1 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 23679 42668 7560 6238 6028 5818 5608 312 102 -108 -318
Up 22502 42470 7560 6077 5867 5657 5447 178 -32 -242 -452
COMB 9 : COMB 1 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 23679 12665 25309 4894 4191 3488 2785 3135 2432 1729 1026
Up 22502 12468 25309 4733 4030 3327 2624 3001 2298 1595 892
COMB 10 : COMB 2 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 23930 43441 8103 6346 6121 5895 5670 312 87 -138 -363
Up 22735 43227 8103 6181 5956 5731 5506 178 -47 -273 -498
Seismic Case

COMB 11 : COMB 2 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 23930 13439 26282 5020 4290 3560 2829 3153 2423 1693 963
Up 22735 13225 26282 4855 4125 3395 2665 3019 2289 1558 828
COMB 12 : COMB 3 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 23869 43387 8262 6341 6111 5882 5652 315 85 -144 -374
Up 22678 43177 8262 6177 5948 5718 5489 181 -49 -278 -508
COMB 13 : COMB 3 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 23869 13385 26336 5010 4279 3547 2816 3151 2420 1688 957
Up 22678 13175 26336 4847 4115 3384 2652 3017 2286 1554 823
COMB 14 : DL+SIDL+EQ-L -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Down 19066 21953 3476 4053 3956 3859 3763 1004 907 810 714
Up 18439 21675 3476 3955 3858 3762 3665 945 848 751 655
COMB 15 : DL+SIDL+EQ-T -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Down 19066 10679 13878 3703 3318 2932 2547 2220 1834 1449 1063
Up 18439 10401 13878 3605 3220 2834 2449 2161 1775 1390 1004
max 6346 6121 5895 5670 3153 2550 2493 2494
For Fix head pile For Free head pile

NH-72A and NH-73 49 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Forces For Found. Design

Additional
Force per Point of
Design
Max Min Resultant pile due to application
CASE LOAD COMBINATION Effective Moment
Moments
Reaction Reaction Force per pile seismic of additional
Length of Reduction at Fixity
weight of force
Pile factor pile
Normal Case

COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case 3282 2490 29.02 106.51


COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal Dry Case 4016 2210 71.72 263.21
COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -Normal Dry Case 3997 2118 71.72 263.21
COMB 4 : DL+SIDL -one Span Dislodege Normal case 2995 1678 29.02 106.51
COMB 5 : COMB 2 + WL -Normal Dry Case Down 3827 2116 87.52 321.21
Wind Case

Up 3654 1949
COMB 6: COMB 3 + WL -Wind Dry Case Down 3827 2116 87.52 321.21
Up 3654 1949
COMB 7 : DL+SIDL+WL -one Span Dislodege Wind case Down 3395 1391 78.15 286.83
Up 3265 1346
COMB 8 : COMB 1 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 6238 -318 551.39 69.237 2333.58
Up 6077 -452
COMB 9 : COMB 1 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 4894 1026 342.15 8.952 0.82 60.378 1525.99
Up 4733 892
COMB 10 : COMB 2 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 6346 -363 557.25 69.237 2355.09
Up 6181 -498
Seismic Case

COMB 11 : COMB 2 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 5020 963 348.97 60.378 1551.01
Up 4855 828
4.476
COMB 12 : COMB 3 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 6341 -374 557.19 69.237 2354.86
Up 6177 -508
COMB 13 : COMB 3 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 5010 957 347.88 60.378 1547.03
Up 4847 823
COMB 14 : DL+SIDL+EQ-L -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Down 4053 714 221.33 69.237 1122.22
Up 3955 655
COMB 15 : DL+SIDL+EQ-T -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Down 3703 1063 190.29 60.378 968.64
Up 3605 1004

NH-72A and NH-73 50 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT PILE MODEL-ANN. II

Design of Pile Shaft :

REFER ANNEXURE - II

NH-72A and NH-73 51 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Pile Cap Design

Design of Pile Cap - Longitudinal Direction


(Note: ONLY LBL CASE HAS CONSIDERED FOR THE DESIGN OF PILE CAP SINCE IT IS GOVERNING)
Design of pile cap will be done by Plate bending theory as per clause 9.2 and 9.4 of IRC :112-2011

Left Span Right Span


Span = 37.500 m Span = 40.000 m

PIER SHAFT
1.55 2 1.55

265.0 m (Pile cap top level)

2.3 m
PILE CAP

262.7 m (Pile cap bottom level)

0.75
1.8 1.8

1.20 1.20

PILES (7,8,9)

PILE (5 to 8) 5.1 PILE (1 to 4)

Design Input :
Depth of Pile Cap = 2300 mm
Clear Cover For Foundation = 75.00 mm
Maximum Diameter of Bar used = 32.00 mm

Grade of Concrete for Pile Cap = M 35


2
fck = 35.00 N/mm
2
fctm = 2.77 N/mm
2
Ec = 32308.25 N/mm
Grade of Reinforcement Steel = Fe 500 D ( HYSD Bars)
2
fy or fyk = 500.00 N/mm
fyd = 434.78 mm (fy/1.15)
2
Es = 200000.00 N/mm

Effective depth of pile cap = 2300.00 -75.00 -58.00 = 2167.00 mm

Reaction Due to Piles (in kN)

PILE (1 to PILE (5
CASE LOAD COMBINATION
4) to 8)
COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case 13122 9969
Normal COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal Dry Case 15623 9282
Case COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -Normal Dry Case 15294 9168
COMB 4 : DL+SIDL -one Span Dislodege Normal case 11978 6715
COMB 5 : COMB 2 + WL -Normal Dry Case Down 14005 9766
Up 13314 9097
Wind COMB 6: COMB 3 + WL -Wind Dry Case Down 14005 9766
Case Up 13314 9097
COMB 7 : DL+SIDL+WL -one Span Dislodege Wind case Down 12279 6867
Up 11758 6687
COMB 8 : COMB 1 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 23692 -12
Up 23048 -546
COMB 9 : COMB 1 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 15358 8321
Up 14714 7788
COMB 10 : COMB 2 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 24032 -102
Up 23375 -640
COMB 11 : COMB 2 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 15698 8232
Seismic Up 15041 7694
Case COMB 12 : COMB 3 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 23987 -117
Up 23333 -655
COMB 13 : COMB 3 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 15653 8217
Up 14999 7679
COMB 14 : DL+SIDL+EQ-L -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Down 15631 3435
Up 15240 3199
COMB 15 : DL+SIDL+EQ-T -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Down 12499 6566
Up 12109 6330
MAX 24032 9969

NH-72A and NH-73 52 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Pile Cap Design

Moment at the face of Pier (Right Side)

Upward Moment due to reaction of piles


From PILE (1 to 4) = 24032.08 x ( 1.664 -0.75 ) = 21959.9 kN.m

Downward moment due to pile cap = 12.30 -x 2.30 x 1.66 x 25.00 x 0.83 = -978.88 kN.m

Net upward moment = 21959.86392 -978.884 = 20980.98 kN.m ---1)

Moment at the face of Pier (Left Side) ( Tension at Bottom of cap)

Upward Moment due to reaction of piles (Other Side)


From PILE (5 to 8) = 9968.72 x ( 1.664 -0.75 ) = 9109.1446 kN.m

Downward moment due to pile cap = 12.30 -x 2.30 x 1.66 x 25.00 x 0.83 = -978.88381 kN.m

Net upward moment = 9109.14 0.00 -978.88 = 8130.26 kN.m ----(2)


( Tension at Bottom of cap)

Governing Moment Along


= 20980.98 kN.m (Maximum of 1 & 2)
Longitudinal Direction ( ML )

Longitudinal Moment (ML ) per meter = 1705.77 kN.m/m

Check For Depth of Pier Cap :


Mult = 0.165 x fck x b x d^2 = 1705.77 kNm/m

Effective Depth of Cap Required (dreq) 1705.77 x 1000000


= SQRT( )
0.165 x 35.00 x 1000

Effective Depth of Cap Required (dreq)


= 543.481 mm

Total Depth Required ( Dreq) = 634.48 mm


Total Depth Provided (Dprov) = 2300.00 mm OK

R= Mu/(b d^2) = 0.36

Minimum Longitudinal Reinforcement in Pile Cap


As. Min = 0.26 x fctm x b.d
fyk
Whichever is higher OR = 0.0015 x b.d

b = 1000.00 mm

d = 2167.00 mm

Ast min = 3250.50 mm2/m

Area of Steel Required:


pt = Astreq = fck { 1 - sqrt( 1- 4.598 R/fck) }
100 bd 2 fy
= 0.001
2
Astreq = 1831.7962 mm /m

2
Ast required = max( Astmin, Astreq) = 3250.50 mm /m

Moment of Resistance of Pile cap is More than Design Bending Moment , HENCE PILE CAP IS SAFE IN BENDING

Steel in Right Direction


2
Provide 32 dia bar 150 mm c/c in Longitudinal direction in bottom. (Providing = 5361.65 mm / m )
2
Provide 0 dia bar 150 mm c/c in Longitudinal direction in bottom. (Providing = 0.00 mm / m )
2
5361.65 mm / m )
(O.K)

Hence percentage of steel provided along Long. Dir. = 0.25 %

Moment Capacity of Pile Cap in Longitudinal Direction


Design
Moment of Resistance (MR
Xm ( m) X (m) z (m) Moment
)(kNm/m)
(kNm/m)

1336.73 112.16 2120.34 4942.84 1705.77

Design is OK Section is Safe

NH-72A and NH-73 53 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Pile Cap Design

Secondary Reinforcement at Top Face of Pile Cap Along Longitudinal Direction :

As per Clause 16.6.1.1. of IRC:112-2011 , Secondary Reinforcement shall be at least 20 % of the main reinforcement

20.00 x 5361.65 = 1072.330 mm2/m


100.00

Provide 16 dia bar 150 mm c/c at Trans direction in top face. (Providing = 1340.4129 mm^2 )

Design of Pile Cap - Transverse Direction


Design of pile cap will be done by Plate bending theory as per clause 9.2 and 9.4 of IRC :112-2011

PIER SHAFT

5.15 2.00 5.15 265.00 m (Pile cap top level)

12.30

2.30 m
PILE CAP
262.70 m (Pile cap bottom level)

0.75 3.60 3.60 3.60 0.75

PILES (4,8) PILES (3,7) PILES (2,6) PILES (1,5)

Effective depth of pile cap = 2300.00 -75.00 0.00 -58.00 = 2167.00 mm

Reaction Due to Piles (in kN)

PILES
CASE LOAD COMBINATION PILES (1,5) PILES (2,6) PILES (4,8)
(3,7)

COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case 5769 5771 5777 5774


COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal
Normal Dry Case 6447 6300 6006 6153
Case COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -
Normal Dry Case 6463 6232 5768 6000

COMB 4 : DL+SIDL -one Span Dislodege Normal case 4672 4673 4675 4674
COMB 5 : COMB 2 + WL -Normal Dry Case 6594 6160 5291 5726
6254 5820 4952 5386
COMB 6: COMB 3 + WL -Wind Dry Case 6594 6160 5291 5726
Wind
Case 6254 5820 4952 5386
COMB 7 : DL+SIDL+WL -one Span Dislodege Wind
5438 5004 4135 4570
case
5262 4828 3960 4394
COMB 8 : COMB 1 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case 6550 6130 5290 5710
6256 5836 4996 5416
COMB 9 : COMB 1 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case 8029 6623 3811 5217
7735 6329 3517 4923
COMB 10 : COMB 2 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case 6658 6208 5307 5758
6359 5909 5008 5459
COMB 11 : COMB 2 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case 8173 6713 3792 5253
7874 6414 3494 4954
Seismic
COMB 12 : COMB 3 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case 6656 6197 5279 5738
Case
6358 5899 4981 5440
COMB 13 : COMB 3 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case 8162 6699 3773 5236
7864 6401 3475 4938
COMB 14 : DL+SIDL+EQ-L -one Span Dislodege
5056 4863 4477 4670
Seismic case
4899 4706 4320 4513
COMB 15 : DL+SIDL+EQ-T -one Span Dislodege
5923 5152 3610 4381
Seismic case
5766 4995 3453 4224
8172.79 6712.67 6006.03 6152.87

NH-72A and NH-73 54 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Pile Cap Design

Moment at the face of Pier (RH Side)

Upward Moment due to reaction of piles (RH Side)


PILES (1,5) = 8172.79 x ( 5.26 -0.75 ) = 36890.10 kN.m
PILES (2,6) = 6712.67 x ( 5.26 -4.35 ) = 6133.9 kN.m

Downward moment due to pile cap 1.35 5.10 -x 2.30 x 5.26 x 25.00 x 2.63 = -5484.49 kN.m

Net upward moment = 43023.95 0.00 -5484.49 = 37539.47 kN.m ----(3)

Moment at the face of Pier (LH Side)


Upward Moment due to reaction of piles (LH Side)
PILES (4,8) = 6006.03 x ( 5.26 -0.75 ) = 27109.87 kN.m
PILES (3,7) = 6152.87 x ( 5.26 -4.35 ) = 5622.33 kN.m

Downward moment due to pile cap 1.35 5.10 -x 2.30 x 5.26 x 25.00 x 2.63 = -5484.5 kN.m

Net upward moment = 27109.87 + -5484.49 = 21625.38 kN.m ----(4)

Governing Moment = 37539.47 kN.m

Design Moment per meter = 7360.68 kN.m/m

R= Mu/(b d^2) = 1.567

Area of Steel Required:


pt = Astreq = fck { 1 - sqrt( 1- 4.598 R/fck) }
100 bd 2 fy
= 0.004
2
Astreq = 8258.6857 mm /m

Astmin, = 3250.50 mm2/m

2
Ast required = max( Astmin, Astreq) = 8258.69 mm /m

Steel in Right Direction


Provide 32 dia bar 125 mm c/c in Transverse Direction in bottom. (Providing = 6433.9818 mm^2 )
Provide 20 dia bar 125 mm c/c in TransverseDirection in bottom. (Providing = 2513.27 mm^2 )
8947.2559 mm^2 )
(O.K)

Hence percentage of steel provided along trans. Dir. = 0.41 %

Moment Capacity of Pile Cap in Transverse Direction


Design
Moment of Resistance (MR
Xm ( m) X (m) z (m) Moment
)(kNm/m)
(kNm/m)

988.35 308.74 2038.56 7930.24 7360.68

Design is OK Section is Safe

Secondary Reinforcement at Top Face of Pile Cap Along Transverse Direction :

As per Clause 16.6.1.1. of IRC:112-2011 , Secondary Reinforcement shall be at least 20 % of the main reinforcement

20.00 x 8947.26 = 1789.451 mm2/m


100.00

Provide 20 dia bar 125 mm c/c at Trans direction in top face. (Providing = 2513.2741 mm^2 )

NH-72A and NH-73 55 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Pile Cap Design

Design Shear Strength of Concrete,(tc) without Shear Reinforcement Along Longitudinal Direction:

As per Clause 10.3.2 of IRC:112-2011,


Design shear resistance of the member without shear reinforcement is given by:


VRd,c  0.12 K 80r1 f ck 
0.33

 0.15s cp bw d eq.1

Subjected to minimum of V Rd ,c  V min  0.15 s cp  b w d eq.2

where,
K= 1 + SQRT(200/d) ≤ 2.0 , where d is depth in mm
K= 1.30
vmin= 0.031 K3/2 fck1/2
, fck = 35.00 N/mm
2

Hence vmin= 0.2730 N/mm2


scp = Concrete compressive stress in concrete at centroidal axis in the direction of axial load or prestressing
scp = NEd/Ac < 0.2 fcd where , fcd = 0.67 fck/1.5
2
scp = 0.00 N/mm for RCC Pile Cap
Hence,

tc = VRd,c/(bw.d) = Vmin + 0.15 scp = 0.2730 N/mm2 From eq.1

r1 = Steel Ratio = Asl/(bw . d) ≤ 0.02


Hence r1 = 0.0025

tc = VRd,c/(bw.d) = 0.2983 N/mm2 From eq.2

Max of eq.1 & eq.2

tc = VRd,c/(bw.d) = 0.2983 N/mm2 Corresponds to steel ratio = 0.247% & M35 Grade of Concrete

SHEAR CHECK IN LONGITUDINAL DIRECTION


shear is being checked at a effective distance d/2 from the face of Pier

Effective Depth of Pile Cap = 2167.00 mm


Shear Force Due To Pile Reaction ( max) = 24032.08 kN

1.18

0.91 Pier Face

Effective depth/2
1.08

SECTION

As per Clause 10.3.2 , Note 5 of IRC:112-2011


av = 1.08 m
2d = 4.33 m
Shear Reduction Factor b = av/2d = 0.25

Reduced Shear Force VEd = 0.25 x 24032.08 = 6008.02 kN

and Also as Per eq. 10.5 of IRC :112-2011


VEd ≤ 0.5 bw d v fcd
where v = 0.6 x ( 1-fck/310 )
= 0.53
fcd = 15.63 N/mm2
VEd ≤ 110893.95 kN OK

Downward Shear load factor


Due to Pile Cap = 0.58 x 12.30 x 2.3 x 25.00 x 1.35 = 554.04 kN

Net Shear
= 6008.02 -554.04 = 5453.98 kN (UPWARD)
force(VEd)

Shear stress( vEd) = VEd/(bw*z)

vEd = 5453981.508 = 0.227 N/mm2 < 0.298 MPa


12300.00 x 1950.30

As vEd is lesser than Tc Hence No Shear Reinforcement is need to be provided.

NH-72A and NH-73 56 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Pile Cap Design

Maximum Shear Strength of Concrete ( tcmax) ( Clause 10.3.3.2, IRC:112-2011, Eq. 10.8)

VRd,max = acw * bw * z * v1* fcd For Maximum Strength , (cotq 1


(cotq + tanq cotq + tan q = 2

where , acw= 1.00 for scp = 0


z= lever arm = 0.9 * d = 1950.30 mm For R.C. Section
v1= strength reduction factor for concrete cracked in shear
v1= 0.60 for fck ≤ 80 MPa
VRd,max = 1.00 x 12300 x 1950.30 x 0.60 x 15.633
2
VRd,max = 1.13E+08 N

tcmax = VRd,max = 4.22 N/mm2


b*d

Design Shear Strength of Concrete,(tc) without Shear Reinforcement Along Transverse Direction:

As per Clause 10.3.2 of IRC:112-2011,


Design shear resistance of the member without shear reinforcement is given by:

eq.1

Subjected to minimum of eq.2

where,
K= 1 + SQRT(200/d) ≤ 2.0 , where d is depth in mm
K= 1.30
vmin= 0.031 K3/2 fck1/2
, fck = 35.00 N/mm
2

Hence vmin= 0.2730 N/mm2


scp = Concrete compressive stress in concrete at centroidal axis in the direction of axial load or prestressing
scp = NEd/Ac < 0.2 fcd where , fcd = 0.67 fck/1.5
2
scp = 0.00 N/mm for RCC Pile Cap
Hence,

tc = VRd,c/(bw.d) = Vmin + 0.15 scp = 0.2730 N/mm2 From eq.1

r1 = Steel Ratio = Asl/(bw . d) ≤ 0.02


Hence r1 = 0.0041

tc = VRd,c/(bw.d) = 0.3538 N/mm2 From eq.2

Max of eq.1 & eq.2

tc = VRd,c/(bw.d) = 0.3538 N/mm2 Corresponds to steel ratio = 0.413% & M35 Grade of Concrete

SHEAR CHECK ALONG TRANSVERSE DIRECTION


shear is being checked at a effective distance d/2 from the face of Pier

Effective Depth of Pile along Transvesre Direction= 2167.00 mm


Shear Force Due To Pile Reaction ( max) = 8172.79 kN

4.78

4.40 Pier Face

Effective depth/2
1.08

SECTION

In this case pile center is at -3.32 outside from Section Hence No need To Check For Shear

As per Clause 10.3.2 , Note 5 of IRC:112-2011


av = 4.40 m
2d = 4.33 m
Shear Reduction Factor b = av/2d = 1.00

NH-72A and NH-73 57 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Pile Cap Design

Reduced Shear Force VEd = 1.00 x 8172.79 = 8172.79 kN


and Also as Per eq. 10.5 of IRC :112-2011
VEd ≤ 0.5 bw d v fcd
where v = 0.6 x ( 1-fck/310 )
= 0.53
fcd = 15.63 N/mm2
VEd ≤ 45980.42 kN OK

Downward Shear load factor


Due to Pile Cap = 4.07 x 5.10 x 2.3 x 25.00 x 1.35 = 1609.88 kN

Net Shear
= 8172.79 -1609.88 = 6562.91 kN (UPWARD)
force(VEd)

Shear stress( vEd) = VEd/(bw*z)

vEd = 6562909.194 = 0.660 N/mm2 > 0.354 MPa


5100.00 x 1950.30

As vEd is greater than Tc Hence Shear Reinforcement is need to be provided.

CALCULATION OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT:

Balance Shear Force (VRd,s) = (vEd-Tc*0) * b * d = 7.29E+06 N

As per Clause 10.3.3.2 of IRC:112-2011

VRd,s= Asw * z fywd * cotq


s
Where,
q 0.5 x sin^-1 [ vEd / ( 0.18 fck ( 1- fck/250))]
q 3.50
cot q = 16.36 < 1 cotq <2.5
Provide cot q = 2.5

Asw= c/s area of shear reinforcement in mm2


z= lever arm = 0.9 * d = 1950.30 mm For R.C. Section
fywd= 0.8 fywk = &0.8*500/1.15 = 347.83 N/mm2
s= Sapcing of Shear Stirrups in mm

2
Asw= VRd,s * s = 7.29E+06 x 150 = 644.97304 mm
fywd*z*cot q 347.83 x 1950.30 x 2.50

Minimum Shear Reinforcement Ratio: As per Clause 10.3.3.5 of IRC:112-2011


Asw = 0.072 * sqrt ( fck) = 0.0009
b*s fyk

2
Asw= 651.72 mm

2
Governing Shear Reinforcement ( Asw)= 651.72 mm

Let us legged
10 dia 12 in Total Width of 5.1 m @ 150 mm C/C
provide stirrups
thus providing = 942.48 OK

CHECK AGAINST PUNCHING AROUND PIER (as per IRC:112-2011, Clause 10.4.3):

Basic Equation for Punching shear stress( VEd) = b VEd,req

ui * d
where ,
d= Depth of pile cap = 2167.00 mm
a= 2d = 4334.00 mm
Least Cantilever of pile cap = 950.00 mm
a = 950.00
ui = Length of perimeter= PI x (a + dia of pier+a) = 12252.21 mm
Loaded area under perimeter= PI X (a+dia/2)^2 = 1.19E+07 mm2

NH-72A and NH-73 58 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Pile Cap Design

Maximum Forces at Bottom of Pile Cap


Pu ML MT
Pmax 24905 11414 2643
MLmax 23930 43441 8103
Mtmax 23869 13385 26336
Number of Pier Shaft = 1
VEd = 23930.43 kN. Vertical Force at Bottom of Shaft
MEd = 44190.00 kNm Moment at bottom of shaft

No. Of Pile under perimeter consideration of punching shear = 0.00 Nos.


Total load from above pile = 0.00 kN.
downward load due to self weight of pile cap under perimeter= 927.30 kN.
Net upward force ΔVEd = -927.30 kN.

VEd,req = VEd - ΔVEd = 24857.73 kN.

For Interior Circular Pier:


b  1 + 0.6 ∏ { e / ( D + 4d) } where, D is Diameter of circular pier = 2.00 m
e = MEd / VEd = 1.85 m

b  1.55

VEd = 1.45 N/mm2

Punching Shear Resistance of Concrete: As per IRC:112-2011, Clause 10.4.5


VRd = 0.12 * K * ( 80*r1 * fck)(1/3) where , K = 1.30
r1 = 0.0032

VRd = 0.325 N/mm2 Vmin= 0.031*k3/2*fck1/2 = 0.2730

As per Clause 10.4.6 of IRC:112-2011


2d/a = 4.56
Governing Punching Shear Resistance of Concrete VRd,c = 0.3248 N/mm2

Governing Punching Shear Resistance of Concrete VRd,c with enhancement = 1.48 N/mm2

As 1.451 < 1.482 Punching Shear Reinf. Is not Required

CHECK AGAINST PUNCHING AROUND PILE SHAFT (as per IRC:112-2011, Clause 10.4.3):

For Pile 2,5


av 0.95 m
Length of Perimeter around pile shaft=ui= 3.14 x (0.946 + 1.2*.5) + 2 x 0.75 2d

ui= 6356.90 mm 2d
b= 1.00 for axial load without bending moment
VEd= 6120.56 KN 0.75

Loaded area under perimeter=


(3.14 x (0.946 + 1.2*.5)^2)/2 + 2 x (0.946 + 1.2*.5) x 0.75
= 6073385.43 mm2
downward load due to self weight of pile cap under perimeter load factor
= 349.22 kN. x 1.35
Net upward force ΔVEd = 471.45 kN.
VEd,req = VEd - ΔVEd = 5649.12 kN.
Punching Shear stress , VEd = b VEd,req = 0.4101 N/mm
2
As 0.41 < 1.488 Hence SAFE

ui * d
2
Punching Resistance of concrete, VRd,c = 1.4882 N/mm

NH-72A and NH-73 59 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Pile Cap Design

0.75
For Corner Pile 1,4,5,8
x 2400.00 mm 0.75

Length of Perimeter around pile shaft=ui= 3.14 x (av+dia of pile*0.5)/2+ 0.75 + 0.75
ui= 6212.39 mm
b = 1.00 2d
VEd = 6345.65 kN.
Loaded area under perimeter= 8.69E+06 mm2

downward load due to self weight of pile cap under perimeter load factor
= 499.47 kN. x 1.35
Net upward force ΔVEd = 674.28 kN.
VEd,req = VEd - ΔVEd = 5671.37 kN.

Punching Shear stress , VEd = b VEd,req = 0.4213 N/mm2


ui * d As 0.421 < 0.587 Hence SAFE in Punching

2
Punching Resistance of concrete, VRd,c = 0.5866 N/mm

NH-72A and NH-73 60 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT ULS Forces For Pier Design

Calculation of ULS Forces For Pier Shaft Design

Pier Shaft Bottom Lvl = 265.00 m Bearing top Level = 274.851 m

COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case


Unit
Volume Vertical Load( Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc.
Loads Load Factor Weights 3 FL (kN) FT (kN) ML = PxeL MT = PxeT
3 (m ) P ) kN. (eL) (m) (eT) (m)
(kN/m )
Superstructure-Left Span
Dead Load 1.35 2926.758 -0.875 0.000 -2560.913 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 549.451 -0.875 0.000 -480.770 0.000
Wearing Course 1.75 819.088 -0.875 0.000 -716.702 0.000
Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1.35 6953.383 0.875 0.000 6084.210 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 430.650 0.875 0.000 376.819 0.000
Wearing Course 1.75 928.613 0.875 0.000 812.536 0.000
Substructure
Pier Cap 1.35 25 66.994 2261.039 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Pier Shaft 1.35 25 22.670 765.103 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 232.171 0.000 2287.004 0.000
Total 15634.085 232.171 0.000 5802.184 0.000

COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal Dry Case


Unit
Volume Vertical Load( Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc.
Loads Load Factor Weights 3 FL (kN) FT (kN) ML = PxeL MT = PxeT
(m ) P ) kN. (eL) (m) (eT) (m)
(kN/m3)
Forces from Case 1 except
horizontal forces due to 15634.085 0.000 0.000 3515.180 0.000
superstructure
CWLL from left span 1.5 0.00 -0.875 0.000 0.000
CWLL(MAX) with Braking
1.5 1814.376 0.875 1587.579 2689.492
Vertical Reaction
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 573.721 0.000 5651.442 0.000
Total 17448.461 573.721 0.000 10754.202 2689.492

COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -Normal Dry Case


Unit
Volume Vertical Load( Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc.
Loads Load Factor Weights 3 FL (kN) FT (kN) ML = PxeL MT = PxeT
(m ) P ) kN. (eL) (m) (eT) (m)
(kN/m3)
Forces from Case 1 except
horizontal forces due to 15634.085 0.000 0.000 3515.180 0.000
superstructure
CWLL from left span 1.5 0.00 -0.875 0.000 0.000
CWLL(MAX) with Braking
1.5 1371.995 0.875 1200.496 4215.811
Vertical Reaction
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 573.721 0.000 5651.442 0.000
Total 17006.080 573.721 0.000 10367.118 4215.811

NH-72A and NH-73 61 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT ULS Forces For Pier Design

COMB 4 : DL+SIDL -one Span Dislodege Normal case


Unit
Volume Vertical Load( Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc.
Loads Load Factor Weights 3 FL (kN) FT (kN) ML = PxeL MT = PxeT
3 (m ) P ) kN. (eL) (m) (eT) (m)
(kN/m )
Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1.35 6953.383 0.875 0.000 6084.210 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 430.650 0.875 0.000 376.819 0.000
Wearing Course 1.75 928.613 0.875 0.000 812.536 0.000
Substructure
Pier Cap 1.35 25 66.994 2261.039 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Pier Shaft 1.35 25 22.670 765.103 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 232.171 0.000 2287.004 0.000
Total 11338.788 232.171 0.000 9560.568 0.000

COMB 5 : COMB 2 + WL -Normal Dry Case Long. Moment Trans. Moment


Unit
Volume Vertical Load( C.g. of Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. ML due to
Loads Load Factor Weights 3 FL (kN) FT (kN) ML = PxeL MT = PxeT MT due to FT
3 (m ) P ) kN. Force (m) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) FL
(kN/m )
Superstructure-Left Span
Dead Load 1.35 2926.758 -0.875 0.000 -2560.913 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 549.451 -0.875 0.000 -480.770 0.000
Wearing Course 1.75 819.088 -0.875 0.000 -716.702 0.000
Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1.35 6953.383 0.875 0.000 6084.210 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 430.650 0.875 0.000 376.819 0.000
Wearing Course 1.75 928.613 0.875 0.000 812.536 0.000
Substructure
Pier Cap 1.35 2261.039 0.000 11.368 273.556 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 97.26
Pier Shaft 1.35 765.103 0.000 16.091 269.145 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 66.70
Wind Load 0.9 391.445 553.054 276.50197 3855.92713 6361.208402
Wind Down from Left Span 328.932 -0.875 -287.816
Wind down from Right Span 350.861 0.875 307.004
Wind UP from Left Span -328.932 -0.875 287.816
Wind UP from Right Span -350.861 0.875 -307.004
Total Down 16313.879 391.445 580.512 3534.368 3855.927 0.000 6525.162
Up 14954.291 3495.993

COMB 6: COMB 3 + WL -Wind Dry Case

Long. Moment Trans. Moment


Unit
Volume Vertical Load( C.g. of Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. ML due to
Loads Load Factor Weights FL (kN) FT (kN) ML = PxeL MT = PxeT MT due to FT
(m3) P ) kN. Force (m) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) FL
(kN/m3)
Total down 16313.879 391.445 580.512 3534.368 3855.927 0.000 6525.162
UP 14954.291 3495.993

NH-72A and NH-73 62 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT ULS Forces For Pier Design

COMB 7 : DL+SIDL+WL -one Span Dislodege Wind case Left Span Dislodge Long. Moment Trans. Moment
Unit
Volume Vertical Load( C.g. of Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. ML due to
Loads Load Factor Weights 3 FL (kN) FT (kN) ML = PxeL MT = PxeT MT due to FT
3 (m ) P ) kN. Force (m) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) FL
(kN/m )
Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1.35 6953.383 0.875 0.000 6084.210 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 430.650 0.875 0.000 376.819 0.000
Wearing Course 1.75 928.613 0.875 0.000 812.536 0.000
Substructure
Pier Cap 1.35 25 66.994 2261.039 0.000 11.368 273.556 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 97.26
Pier Shaft 1.35 25 22.670 765.103 0.000 16.091 269.145 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 66.70
Wind Load 0.9 232.171 553.054 276.50197 2287.00359 6361.208402
Wind down from Right Span 350.861 0.875 307.004
Wind UP from Right Span -350.861 0.875 -307.004
Total Down 11689.649 232.171 580.512 7580.569 2287.004 0.000 6525.162
UP 10987.927 6966.561

COMB 8 : COMB 1 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case For Substructure Excluding Pier Cap For Pier Cap *Seismic coeff. are modified with seismic effect factor
αh= 0.141 in Longitudinal direction αh= 0.141 in Longitudinal direction
Seismic Effect Factor = 1.50 αh= 0.120 In Transverse direction αh= 0.120 In Transverse direction
αv= 0.094 In Vertical Direction αv= 0.094 In Vertical Direction
Long. Moment Trans. Moment
Unit
Volume Vertical Load( FL = αh x P FT = 0.3 x αh Fv = 0.3 x C.g. of Force Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MLs due to
Loads Load Factor Weights 3 ML = PxeL MLs due to FL MT = PxeT MTs due to FT
(m ) P ) kN. (kN) x P (kN) αv x P (kN) in Trans. (m) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) Fv
(kN/m3)
Superstructure-Left Span
Dead Load 1.35 2926.758 78.059 61.340 276.516 -0.875 0.000 -2560.913 -53.673 0.000 898.897
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 549.451 14.654 11.516 277.632 -0.875 0.000 -480.770 -10.076 0.000 185.114
Wearing Course 1.75 819.088 16.852 13.243 277.210 -0.875 0.000 -716.702 -11.588 0.000 205.767
Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1.35 6953.383 185.452 145.732 276.219 0.875 0.000 6084.210 127.515 0.000 2080.642
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 430.650 11.486 9.026 277.632 0.875 0.000 376.819 7.898 0.000 145.089
Wearing Course 1.75 928.613 19.106 15.014 277.210 0.875 0.000 812.536 13.137 0.000 233.281
Substructure
Pier Cap 1.35 25 66.994 2261.039 319.868 60.303 47.388 273.556 0.000 0.000 0.000 2736.627 0.000 0.000 515.926
Pier Shaft 1.35 25 22.670 765.103 108.239 20.406 16.035 269.145 0.000 0.000 0.000 448.649 0.000 0.000 84.582
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 1929.885 0.000 19010.328 0.000
TOTAL 15634.085 2357.991 406.318 319.293 3515.180 22195.604 73.213 0.000 4349.300
-319.293 -73.213

COMB 9 : COMB 1 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Long. Moment Trans. Moment
Unit
Volume Vertical Load( FL = 0.3x FT = αh x P Fv = 0.3 x C.g. of Force Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MLs due to
Loads Load Factor Weights 3 ML = PxeL MLs due to FL MT = PxeT MTs due to FT
3 (m ) P ) kN. αh x P (kN) (kN) αv x P (kN) in Trans. (m) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) Fv
(kN/m )
Superstructure-Left Span
Dead Load 1.35 2926.758 260.196 61.340 276.516 -0.875 0.000 -2560.913 -53.673 0.000 2996.325
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 549.451 48.847 11.516 277.632 -0.875 0.000 -480.770 -10.076 0.000 617.047
Wearing Course 1.75 819.088 56.174 13.243 277.210 -0.875 0.000 -716.702 -11.588 0.000 685.890
Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1.35 6953.383 618.172 145.732 276.219 0.875 0.000 6084.210 127.515 0.000 6935.475
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 430.650 38.286 9.026 277.632 0.875 0.000 376.819 7.898 0.000 483.630
Wearing Course 1.75 928.613 63.686 15.014 277.210 0.875 0.000 812.536 13.137 0.000 777.605
Substructure
Pier Cap 1.35 25 66.994 2261.039 95.960 201.012 47.388 273.556 0.000 0.000 0.000 820.988 0.000 0.000 1719.755
Pier Shaft 1.35 25 22.670 765.103 32.472 68.019 16.035 269.145 0.000 0.000 0.000 134.595 0.000 0.000 281.941
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 486.828 0.000 4795.502 0.000
TOTAL 15634.085 615.260 1354.392 319.293 3515.180 5751.085 73.213 0.000 14497.667
-319.293 -73.213

NH-72A and NH-73 63 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT ULS Forces For Pier Design

COMB 10 : COMB 2 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case

Unit
Volume Vertical Load( FL = αh x P FT = 0.3 x αh Fv = 0.3 x C.g. of Force Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MLs due to
Loads Load Factor Weights 3 ML = PxeL MLs due to FL MT = PxeT MTs due to FT
(m ) P ) kN. (kN) x P (kN) αv x P (kN) in Trans. (m) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) Fv
(kN/m3)
Forces from Case 8 except
horizontal forces due to 15634.085 428.106 406.318 319.293 3515.180 3185.276 73.213 0.000 4349.300
superstructure
CWLL from left span 0.000 0.000 0.000 278.385 -0.875 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
CWLL(MAX) with Braking
241.917 8.710 6.845 278.385 0.875 211.677 5.989 358.599 116.588
Vertical Reaction
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 1975.425 0.000 19458.920 0.000
Total 15876.002 2403.531 415.028 326.138 3726.858 22644.195 79.203 358.599 4465.888
-326.138 -79.203

COMB 11 : COMB 2 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case

Unit
Volume Vertical Load( FL = 0.3x FT = αh x P Fv = 0.3 x C.g. of Force Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MLs due to
Loads Load Factor Weights ML = PxeL MLs due to FL MT = PxeT MTs due to FT
(m3) P ) kN. αh x P (kN) (kN) αv x P (kN) in Trans. (m) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) Fv
(kN/m3)
Forces from Case 9 except
horizontal forces due to 15634.085 128.432 1354.392 319.293 3515.180 955.583 73.213 0.000 14497.667
superstructure
CWLL from left span 0.000 0.000 0.000 278.385 -0.875 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
CWLL(MAX) with Braking
241.917 29.034 6.845 278.385 0.875 211.677 5.989 358.599 388.625
Vertical Reaction
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 532.368 0.000 5244.094 0.000
Total 15876.002 660.800 1383.426 326.138 3726.858 6199.677 79.203 358.599 14886.293
-326.138 -79.203

COMB 12 : COMB 3 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case

Unit
Volume Vertical Load( FL = αh x P FT = 0.3 x αh Fv = 0.3 x C.g. of Force Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MLs due to
Loads Load Factor Weights 3 ML = PxeL MLs due to FL MT = PxeT MTs due to FT
3 (m ) P ) kN. (kN) x P (kN) αv x P (kN) in Trans. (m) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) Fv
(kN/m )
Forces from Case 8 except
horizontal forces due to 15634.085 428.106 406.318 319.293 3515.180 3185.276 73.213 0.000 4349.300
superstructure
CWLL from left span 0.000 0.000 0.000 278.385 -0.875 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
CWLL(MAX) with Braking
182.933 6.587 5.176 278.385 0.875 160.066 4.529 562.108 88.161
Vertical Reaction
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 1975.425 0.000 19458.920 0.000
Total 15817.017 2403.531 412.904 324.469 3675.246 22644.195 77.742 562.108 4437.461
-324.469 -77.742

NH-72A and NH-73 64 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT ULS Forces For Pier Design

COMB 13 : COMB 3 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case

Unit
Volume Vertical Load( FL = 0.3x FT = αh x P Fv = 0.3 x C.g. of Force Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MLs due to
Loads Load Factor Weights 3 ML = PxeL MLs due to FL MT = PxeT MTs due to FT
3 (m ) P ) kN. αh x P (kN) (kN) αv x P (kN) in Trans. (m) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) Fv
(kN/m )
Forces from Case 9 except
horizontal forces due to 15634.085 128.432 1354.392 319.293 3515.180 955.583 73.213 0.000 14497.667
superstructure
CWLL from left span 0.000 0.000 0.000 278.385 -0.875 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
CWLL(MAX) with Braking
182.933 21.955 5.176 278.385 0.875 160.066 4.529 562.108 293.871
Vertical Reaction
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 532.368 0.000 5244.094 0.000
Total 15817.017 660.800 1376.347 324.469 3675.246 6199.677 77.742 562.108 14791.538
-324.469 -77.742

COMB 14 : DL+SIDL+EQ-L -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Left Span Dislodge
For Substructure Excluding Pier Cap For Pier Cap
Seismic Effect Factor = 0.75 αh= 0.071 in Longitudinal direction αh= 0.071 in Longitudinal direction
*Seismic coeff. are modified with seismic effect factor αh= 0.060 In Transverse direction αh= 0.060 In Transverse direction
αv= 0.047 In Vertical Direction αv= 0.047 In Vertical Direction
Long. Moment Trans. Moment
Unit
Volume Vertical Load( FL = αh x P FT = 0.3 x αh Fv = 0.3 x C.g. of Force Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MLs due to
Loads Load Factor Weights 3 ML = PxeL MLs due to FL MT = PxeT MTs due to FT
(m ) P ) kN. (kN) x P (kN) αv x P (kN) in Trans. (m) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) Fv
(kN/m3)
Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1.35 6953.383 125.180 98.369 276.219 0.875 0.000 6084.210 86.073 0.000 1404.434
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 430.650 7.753 6.092 277.632 0.875 0.000 376.819 5.331 0.000 97.935
Wearing Course 1.75 928.613 16.718 13.137 277.210 0.875 0.000 812.536 11.495 0.000 204.121
Substructure
Pier Cap 1.35 25 66.994 2261.039 159.934 40.705 31.987 273.556 0.000 0.000 0.000 1368.313 0.000 0.000 348.250
Pier Shaft 1.35 25 22.670 765.103 54.119 13.774 10.824 269.145 0.000 0.000 0.000 224.325 0.000 0.000 57.093
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 707.381 0.000 6968.052 0.000
TOTAL 11338.788 921.434 204.129 160.409 7273.565 8560.690 102.899 0.000 2111.833
-160.409 -102.899

COMB 15 : DL+SIDL+EQ-T -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Left Span Dislodge Long. Moment Trans. Moment
Unit
Volume Vertical Load( FL = 0.3 x FT = αh x P Fv = 0.3 x C.g. of Force Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MLs due to
Loads Load Factor Weights 3 ML = PxeL MLs due to FL MT = PxeT MTs due to FT
3 (m ) P ) kN. αh x P (kN) (kN) αv x P (kN) in Trans. (m) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) Fv
(kN/m )
Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1.35 6953.383 417.266 98.369 276.219 0.875 0.000 6084.210 86.073 0.000 4681.445
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.35 430.650 25.843 6.092 277.632 0.875 0.000 376.819 5.331 0.000 326.450
Wearing Course 1.75 928.613 55.725 13.137 277.210 0.875 0.000 812.536 11.495 0.000 680.404
Substructure
Pier Cap 1.35 25 66.994 2261.039 47.980 135.683 31.987 273.556 0.000 0.000 0.000 410.494 0.000 0.000 1160.834
Pier Shaft 1.35 25 22.670 765.103 16.236 45.913 10.824 269.145 0.000 0.000 0.000 67.297 0.000 0.000 190.310
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 232.171 0.000 2287.004 0.000
TOTAL 11338.788 296.387 680.430 160.409 7273.565 2764.795 102.899 0.000 7039.444
-160.409 -102.899

Centrifugal Force : Normal Case


Centrifugal Force (C.F.) = 1.50 x 0.00 = 0.00 KN
Transverse Moment due to C.F. = 0.000 x ( 278.500 - 265.000 ) = 0.00 kNm

Centrifugal Force : Seismic Case


Centrifugal Force (C.F.) = 1.00 x 0.00 = 0.000 KN
Transverse Moment due to C.F. = 0.000 x ( 278.500 - 265.000 ) = 0.000 kNm

NH-72A and NH-73 65 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT ULS Forces For Pier Design

Summary of Forces For Design of Pier Shaft

CASE
LOAD COMBINATION P (kN) ML (kNm) MT (kNm) FL (kN) FT (kN)

COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case 15634 5802 0 232 0


Normal Case

COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal Dry Case 17448 10754 2689 574 0

COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -Normal Dry Case 17006 10367 4216 574 0

COMB 4 : DL+SIDL -one Span Dislodege Normal case 11339 9561 0 232 0

COMB 5 : COMB 2 + WL -Normal Dry Case Down 16314 7390 6525 391 581

Up 14954 7352 6525


Wind Case

COMB 6: COMB 3 + WL -Wind Dry Case Down 16314 7390 6525 391 581

Up 14954 7352 6525

COMB 7 : DL+SIDL+WL -one Span Dislodege Wind case Down 11690 9868 6525 232 581

Up 10988 9254 6525

COMB 8 : COMB 1 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 15953 25784 4349 2358 406

Up 15315 25638 4349

COMB 9 : COMB 1 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 15953 9339 14498 615 1354

Up 15315 9193 14498

COMB 10 : COMB 2 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 16202 26450 4824 2404 415

Up 15550 26292 4824


Seismic Case

COMB 11 : COMB 2 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 16202 10006 15245 661 1383

Up 15550 9847 15245

COMB 12 : COMB 3 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 16141 26397 5000 2404 413

Up 15493 26242 5000

COMB 13 : COMB 3 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 16141 9953 15354 661 1376

Up 15493 9797 15354

COMB 14 : DL+SIDL+EQ-L -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Down 11499 15937 2112 921 204

Up 11178 15731 2112

COMB 15 : DL+SIDL+EQ-T -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Down 11499 10141 7039 296 680

Up 11178 9935 7039

NH-72A and NH-73 66 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT ULS Forces For Pier Design

Number of Pier Shaft = 1

Summary of Forces per Pier Shaft

MR= FR=
CASE
LOAD COMBINATION P (kN) ML (kNm) MT (kNm) SQRT(ML^2 FL (kN) FT (kN) SQRT(FL^2
+MT^2) +MFT^2)

COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case 15634 5802 0 5802 232 0 232


Normal Case

COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal Dry Case 17448 10754 2689 11085 574 0 574

COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -Normal Dry Case 17006 10367 4216 11192 574 0 574

COMB 4 : DL+SIDL -one Span Dislodege Normal case 11339 9561 0 9561 232 0 232

COMB 5 : COMB 2 + WL -Normal Dry Case Down 16314 7390 6525 9859 391 581 700

Up 14954 7352 6525 9830


Wind Case

COMB 6: COMB 3 + WL -Wind Dry Case Down 16314 7390 6525 9859 391 581 700

Up 14954 7352 6525 9830

COMB 7 : DL+SIDL+WL -one Span Dislodege Wind case Down 11690 9868 6525 11830 232 581 625

Up 10988 9254 6525 11323

COMB 8 : COMB 1 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 15953 25784 4349 26148 2358 406 2393

Up 15315 25638 4349 26004

COMB 9 : COMB 1 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 15953 9339 14498 17246 615 1354 1488

Up 15315 9193 14498 17167

COMB 10 : COMB 2 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 16202 26450 4824 26887 2404 415 2439

Up 15550 26292 4824 26731


Seismic Case

COMB 11 : COMB 2 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 16202 10006 15245 18235 661 1383 1533

Up 15550 9847 15245 18149

COMB 12 : COMB 3 + EQ-L -Seismic Dry Case Down 16141 26397 5000 26866 2404 413 2439

Up 15493 26242 5000 26714

COMB 13 : COMB 3 + EQ-T -Seismic Dry Case Down 16141 9953 15354 18297 661 1376 1527

Up 15493 9797 15354 18213

COMB 14 : DL+SIDL+EQ-L -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Down 11499 15937 2112 16076 921 204 944

Up 11178 15731 2112 15872

COMB 15 : DL+SIDL+EQ-T -one Span Dislodege Seismic case Down 11499 10141 7039 12345 296 680 742

Up 11178 9935 7039 12177

NH-72A and NH-73 67 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT SLS Forces For Pier Shaft

Calculation of SLS Forces For Pier Shaft Design

Pier Shaft Bottom Lvl = 265.00 m Bearing top Level = 274.851 m

COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case


Unit Vertical
Volume Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MT =
Loads Load Factor Weights Load( P ) FL (kN) FT (kN) ML = PxeL
(m3) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) PxeT
(kN/m3) kN.

Superstructure-Left Span
Dead Load 1.0 2167.969 -0.875 0.000 -1896.973 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.0 407.001 -0.875 0.000 -356.126 0.000
Wearing Course 1.2 561.660 -0.875 0.000 -491.453 0.000
Superstructure-Right Span
Dead Load 1.0 5150.654 0.875 0.000 4506.822 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.0 319.000 0.875 0.000 279.125 0.000
Wearing Course 1.2 636.763 0.875 0.000 557.168 0.000
Substructure
Pier Cap 1.0 25 66.994 1674.844 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Pier Shaft 1.0 25 22.670 566.743 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 232.171 0.000 2287.004 0.000
Total 11484.634 232.171 0.000 4885.567 0.000

COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal Dry Case


Unit Vertical
Volume Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MT =
Loads Load Factor Weights Load( P ) FL (kN) FT (kN) ML = PxeL
(m3) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) PxeT
(kN/m3) kN.
Forces from Case 1 except
horizontal forces due to 11484.634 0.000 0.000 2598.564 0.000
superstructure
CWLL from left span 1.00 0.00 -0.875 0.000 0.000
CWLL(MAX) with Braking
1.00 1209.584 0.875 1058.386 1792.995
Vertical Reaction
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 459.871 0.000 4529.962 0.000
Total 12694.218 459.871 0.000 8186.913 1792.995

COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -Normal Dry Case


Unit Vertical
Volume Long. Ecc. Transv. Ecc. MT =
Loads Load Factor Weights Load( P ) FL (kN) FT (kN) ML = PxeL
(m3) (eL) (m) (eT) (m) PxeT
(kN/m3) kN.
Forces from Case 1 except
horizontal forces due to 11484.634 0.000 0.000 2598.564 0.000
superstructure
CWLL from left span 1.00 0.00 -0.875 0.000 0.000
CWLL(MAX) with Braking
1.00 914.664 0.875 800.331 2810.540
Vertical Reaction
Net Horizontal Force at Bearing 459.871 0.000 4529.962 0.000
Total 12399.297 459.871 0.000 7928.857 2810.540

Centrifugal Force : Normal Case


Centrifugal Force (C.F.) = 1.00 x 0.00 = 0.00 KN
Transverse Moment due to C.F. = 0.000 x ( 278.500 - 265.000 ) = 0.00 kNm

Summary of SLS Forces For Design of Pier Shaft

MR=
CASE LOAD COMBINATION P (kN) ML (kNm) MT (kNm) SQRT(ML^2 FL (kN) FT (kN)
+MT^2)

COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case 11485 4886 0 4886 232 0


SLS

COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal Dry Case 12694 8187 1793 8381 460 0

COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -Normal Dry Case 12399 7929 2811 8412 460 0

Number of Pier Shaft = 1

Summary of SLS Forces Per Pier Shaft

MR=
CASE LOAD COMBINATION P (kN) ML (kNm) MT (kNm) SQRT(ML^2 FL (kN) FT (kN)
+MT^2)

COMB 1: DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case 11485 4886 0 4886 232 0


SLS

COMB 2: DL+SIDL + LL(Maximum Reaction) -Normal Dry Case 12694 8187 1793 8381 460 0

COMB 3: DL+SIDL + LL(Max Transverse Moment) -Normal Dry Case 12399 7929 2811 8412 460 0

NH-72A and NH-73 68 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Pier shaft -Anx-III

Design of Pier Shaft:

REFER ANNEXURE - III

NH-72A and NH-73 69 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Pier Cap-ULS

DESIGN OF PIER CAP

Width of pier cap (Long direction) = 3.75 m


Length of pier cap (Trans direction) = 12.50 m

Width of pier (Long Direction) = 2.00 m


Length of Pier Uniform Portion = 2.00 m
Circular cut-water diameter = 0.00 m 0.00 m
Outer to outer Length/Diameter of pier (Trans Direction)
= 2.00 m
Thickness of Uniform Portion of Cap = 0.90 m
Thickness of Tapering Portion of Cap = 0.90 m
LEFT RIGHT
c/c Distance between bearing (Long) = 0.750 m 1 m
c/c Distance between bearing (Trans) = 2.50 m Steel plate Girder
No of Bearing per span excluding pin brg. = 5.00 Nos. Steel plate Girder

c/c Distance between bearing (Trans) = 3.00 m Precast PSC Girder


No of Bearing per span excluding pin brg. = 4.00 Nos. Precast PSC Girder

Volumnn of Cantilever portion of cap = 26.92 m3


C.g. of Cap from face of pier = 2.33 m
3
Density of concrete = 25.00 kN/m
C.g. of Pedestal(left) from face of pier = 4.11 m Steel plate Girder
C.g. of Pedestal(Right) from face of pier = 3.61 m Precast PSC Girder
C.g. of Trans. Arrestor from face of pier shaft = 3.50 m
Centre distance of jack from face of pier shaft = 3.36 m Left Span
Centre distance of jack from face of pier shaft = 3.36 m Right Span

Transverse Direction
1250 2500 2500 2500 2500 1250

L1 L2 1000
L3 L4 L5

Direction of Traffic
Longitudinal

1000.00 4000 750


Direction

Movement
2000 2000 3750
3500
1000.00 1000
R1 R2 R3 R4
1000
1750 3000 3000 3000 1750
12500
5250

Section in Trans direction


LEFT RIGHT
Distance of point of load from face of support a = 4114 mm 3614 mm

Overall depth of section at face of support h = 1800 mm 1800 mm

Clear Cover c = 50 mm 50 mm

Dia of main reinforcement f = 32 mm 32 mm

Effective Depth of Section d' = 1661 mm dia. mm ######## mm

Design Depth of Section ( z = 0.9 d' ) d = 1494.9 mm 1494.9 mm

For the section to be designed as corbel " a / d " shall be less than 1.

Hence a/d = 4113.77 / 1661 3613.77 / 1661

= 2.48 >1.0 2.18 >1.0

As the ratio " a / d " is more than 1, so the section is to be designed as a cantilever

NH-72A and NH-73 70 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Pier Cap-ULS

DESIGN OF CAP ALONG TRANSVERSE DIRECTION AS CANTILEVER

1) Summary of Load over Cantilever Portion of Cap: Normal Case

Left Bearing
Moment
Factored Factored
Eccentricity Eccentricity (MT) @
Loads from superstructure Load Factor Vertical load Vertical
(m) (m) face of pier
(kN) load (kN)
(kNm)
DL 1.35 585.352 4.11 585.352 1.61 3352.63
SIDL without W.C. 1.35 450.537 4.11 -233.179 1.61 1477.11
Wearing Coat 1.75 142.450 4.11 178.063 1.61 873.36
LL 1.50 0.000 4.11 0.000 1.61 0.00
1178.338 530.235 5703.096

Right Bearing
Moment
Factored Factored
Eccentricity Eccentricity (MT) @
Loads from superstructure Load Factor Vertical load Vertical
(m) (m) face of pier
(kN) load (kN)
(kNm)
DL 1.35 1705.012 3.61 1771.680 0.61 7248.93
SIDL without W.C. 1.35 189.000 3.61 26.325 0.61 699.16
Wearing Coat 1.75 222.060 3.61 242.247 0.61 951.16
LL 1.50 1092.499 3.61 508.330 0.61 4260.04
3208.570 2548.581 13159.294

Left Bearing Right Bearing


Moment
Factored Factored
Eccentricity Eccentricity (MT) @
Vertical load Vertical
(m) (m) face of pier
(kN) load (kN)
(kNm)
Weight of Pedestal 1.35 6.480 4.114 6.480 3.614 50.074
Weight of Tran. Seismic Arrestor 1.35 9.690 4.70 9.690 0.00 45.541
Weight of Long. Seismic Arrestor 1.35 15.356 2.75 7.678 3.61 69.977
Weight of Pedestal wall 1.35 292.027 2.63 0.000 0.00 766.571
Weight of Pier Cap 1.35 908.402 2.327 2113.720
1231.955 23.848 3045.884

Total Flexural Moment ( Mu) @ face of pier = 21908.27 kNm


Total Flexural Shear (VEd,s) @ face of pier = 8721.53 kN

NH-72A and NH-73 71 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Pier Cap-ULS

2) Summary of Load over Cantilever Portion of Cap: Seismic Case


Seismic Effect Factor = 1.50 Seismic coeff av = 0.085
Left Bearing
Fact. Fv due to Fv due to Moment
Eccentricity Fact. Vertical Eccentricity
Loads from superstructure Vertical load seismic seismic (MT) @ face
(m) load (kN) (m)
Load Factor (kN) (kN) (kN) of pier (kNm)
DL 1.35 585.352 55.206 4.11 585.352 55.21 1.61 3668.82
SIDL without W.C. 1.35 450.537 42.491 4.11 -233.179 -21.99 1.61 1616.42
Wearing Coat 1.75 142.450 10.364 4.11 178.063 12.96 1.61 936.90
LL 0.20 0.000 0.000 4.11 0.000 0.00 1.61 0.00
1178.338 108.062 530.235 46.169 6222.144

Right Bearing
Fv due to Fv due to Moment
Vertical load Eccentricity Vertical load Eccentricity
Loads from superstructure Load Factor seismic seismic (MT) @ face
(kN) (m) (kN) (m)
(kN) (kN) of pier (kNm)
DL 1.35 1705.012 160.805 3.61 1771.680 167.092 0.61 7932.60
SIDL without W.C. 1.35 189.000 17.825 3.61 26.325 2.483 0.61 765.10
Wearing Coat 1.75 222.060 16.156 3.61 242.247 17.625 0.61 1020.36
LL 0.20 145.666 92.733 3.61 0.000 0.000 0.61 861.52
2261.738 287.519 2040.251 187.200 10579.584

Left Bearing Right Bearing


Fact. Fv due to Fv due to Moment
Eccentricity Fact. Vertical Eccentricity
Vertical load seismic seismic (MT) @ face
(m) load (kN) (m)
(kN) (kN) (kN) of pier (kNm)
Weight of Pedestal 1.35 6.480 0.611 4.114 6.480 0.611 3.614 54.797
Weight of Tran. Seismic Arrestor 1.35 9.690 0.914 4.70 9.690 0.914 0.00 49.836
Weight of Long. Seismic Arrestor 1.35 15.356 1.448 2.75 7.678 0.724 3.61 76.576
weight of pedestal wall 1.35 292.027 27.542 2.63 0.000 0.000 0.00 838.869
Weight of Pier Cap 1.35 908.402 85.674 2.327 2313.071
1231.955 116.189 23.848 2.249 3333.150

Total Flexural Moment ( Mu) @ face of pier in seismic case = 20134.88 kNm
Total Flexural Shear (VEd,s) @ face of pier in seismic case = 8013.75 kN

Governing Flexural Moment ( Mu) @ face of pier (Max of 1 , 2) = 21908.27 kNm


Governing Flexural Shear (VEd,s) @ face of pier (Max of 1 , 2) = 8721.53 kN

Torsional Moment and Shear Force

Eccentricity of unbalance force = 0.875 m


Torsional moment @ face of pier ( Tu) = 3542.51 kNm
Shear due to torsional moment ( VEd,t) = tt , tef , z where tt = TEd/( 2 Ak,tef)
B = 3.75 m
D = 1.80 m
Total area of section , A = 6.75 m2
Perimeter of section , u = 11.10 m
Effective cover = 114.00 mm
tef,i = max(A / u, 2*eff. Cover) = 0.608 m
Ak = 1.48 m2
uk = 6.24 m

z = 3.75 m
Shear due to torsional moment ( VEd,t) = 4490.45 kN

Material Properties:

Grade of Concrete = M 40
fck = 40 N/mm2
fcd = 17.87 N/mm2
fctm = 3.03 N/mm2
Ec = 31622.7766 N/mm2 ( 5000 x sqrt ( fck )
Grade of Steel = Fe 500 ( HYSD Bars)
fy or fyk = 500.00 N/mm 2

fyd = 434.78 N/mm2 (fy/1.15)


Es = 200000.00 N/mm 2

NH-72A and NH-73 72 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Pier Cap-ULS

Maximum Torsional Moment TRd,max = 2. n . acw. fcd .Ak. tef. sinq . cosq
where
strength reduction factor for section cracked in shear = n = 0.6 [ 1 - fck/310 ] = 0.52
cot q = 2.50
q = smallest angle before concrete crushing starts hence q = 21.80 deg
Mean compr. stress at c.g. sec. scp = NEd / Ac ≤ 0.2 fcd = 0.00
Coefficient acw ( eq.10.9 of IRC:112-2011) = 1.000
tef = 0.61 m
Ak = 1.48 m2

TRD,max = 5792.036 kNm

Maximum shear capacity VRd,max

Coefficient acw = 1
bw = 3.75 m
z = 1.495 m
v1 = 0.6
q = smallest angle before concrete crushing starts = 21.80 deg
Cot q = 2.50
Tan q = 0.40
VRd,max = 20722.41 KN

TEd/TRd,max + VEd/ VRd,max ≤ 1.0 = 0.6116 + 0.2167 = 0.8283 SAFE

Part-I : Calculation of Transverse Reinforcement Due to Flexure

Check For Depth of Pier Cap :


Mult = 0.165x fck x b x d^2 = 21908.27 kNm

Effective Depth of Cap Required (dreq) 21908.27 x 1000000


= SQRT( )
0.165 x 40 x 3750

Effective Depth of Cap Required (dreq) = 940.84154 mm

Total Depth Required ( Dreq) = 1063.84 mm


Total Depth Provided (Dprov) = 1800.00 mm OK

R= Mu/(b d^2) = 2.12

NH-72A and NH-73 73 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Pier Cap-ULS

Minimum Longitudinal Reinforcement in Pier Cap :

As. Min = 0.26 x fctm x b.d


fyk
OR = 0.0015 x b.d
Whichever is higher

b = 3750.00 mm

d = 1494.90 mm

Ast min = 8830.52 mm2

Area of Steel Required:


pt = Astreq = fck { 1 - sqrt( 1- 4.598 R/fck) }
100 bd 2 fy
= 0.005
2
Astreq = 32434.551 mm

2
Ast required = max( Astmin, Astreq) = 32434.55 mm

Part-II : Calculation of Transverse Reinforcement Due to Torsion

Transverse Reinforcement due to Torsion: As per Clause 10.5.2 , eq 10.49 of IRC:112-2011

Asl fyd TEd cot q


 uk

2 Ak
By rearranging the above equation
Asl = TEd cot q uk
2 Ak fyd

Where , uk = 11100 mm
2
Ak = 6750000 mm
cot q = 2.5
Torsional Moment, TEd = 3.543E+09 Nmm

2
Transverse steel due to Torsion, Asl = 16748.177 mm

Part-I Part-II
Total Transverse Reinforcement = 32434.55 + 16748.18

2
= 49182.73 mm

1st layer Provide 32 mm dia. @ 34 Nos. = 27344.42 mm2


2nd layer Provide 32 mm dia. @ 34 Nos. = 27344.42 mm2
0.88 % OK
3rd layer Provide 0 mm dia. @ 0 Nos. = 0.00 mm2
= 54688.84 mm2

Spacing of bars = 106.4 mm

NH-72A and NH-73 74 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Pier Cap-ULS

Moment of Resistance of Section corresponding to Provided Ast


Mu = 0.87 fy Ast d [1 - Ast fy / b d fck]

= 31226.38 kNm > 25450.78 kNm


SAFE

Part-III : Shear Reinforcement Due to Flexure & Torsion

Ultimate Shear Force Due to Flexure , VEd,s = 8721.53 kN


Ultimate Shear Force Due to Torsion , VEd,t = 4490.45 kN

Reduction in Shear Force Due to Varrying Depth = Vccd = M tanb kN


d
tanb = 0.17
= 21908.27 x 0.17
1.49

Vccd = 2512.34 kN

Net Shear Force VNS = VEd - Vccd


= 6209.18 kN
Design Shear Strength of Concrete,(tc) without Shear Reinforcement:

As per Clause 10.3.2 of IRC:112-2011,


Design shear resistance of the member without shear reinforcement is given by:


VRd,c  0.12 K 80r1 f ck 
0.33

 0.15s cp bw d eq.1

Subjected to minimum of V Rd ,c  V min  0.15 s cp bw d eq.2

where,
K= 1 + SQRT(200/d) ≤ 2.0 , where d is depth in mm
K= 1.35
0.031 K3/2 fck1/2 2
vmin= , fck = 40.00 N/mm

Hence vmin= 0.3065 N/mm2

scp = Concrete compressive stress in concrete at centroidal axis in the direction of axial load or prestressing
scp = NEd/Ac < 0.2 fcd where , fcd = 0.67 fck/1.5
2
scp = 0.00 N/mm for RCC Pier Cap
Hence,

tc = VRd,c/(bw.d) = Vmin + 0.15 scp = 0.3065 N/mm2 From eq.1

r1 = Steel Ratio = Asl/(bw . d) ≤ 0.02


Hence r1 = 0.0088

tc = VRd,c/(bw.d) = 0.4914 N/mm2 From eq.2

Max of eq.1 & eq.2

tc = VRd,c/(bw.d) = 0.491 N/mm2 Corresponds to steel ratio = 0.878% & M40 Grade of Concrete

Shear stress( Tv) = VNS/(bw*z) = VNS/(b*0.9d), Where VEd = Normal Shear Force at Pier Face

Tv = 6209.18 x 1000 = 1.11 N/mm2 > 0.491 MPa


3750.00 x 1494.90

As Tv is greater than Tc Hence Shear Reinforcement is need to be provided.

NH-72A and NH-73 75 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Pier Cap-ULS

CALCULATION OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT:

Balance Shear Force Due to Flexure (VRd,s) = (Tv-Tc*0) * b * d = 6899092.2 N

Shear Force Due to Torsion(VRd,t) = 4490453.1 N

Total Shear Force VRd = VRd,s + VRd,t = ######### N

As per Clause 10.3.3.2 of IRC:112-2011

VRd = Asw * z fywd * cotq


s
Where,
q 0.5 x sin^-1 [ ved / ( 0.18 fck ( 1- fck/250))]
 5.276
cot q = 10.828 < 1 cotq <2.5
Provide cot q = 2.5
Asw= c/s area of shear reinforcement in mm2
z= lever arm = 0.9 * d = 1494.90 mm For R.C. Section
fywd= 0.8 fywk = &0.8*500/1.15 = 347.83 N/mm2

Provide 2 leg stirrups of 16 mm dia bar


Provide 4 leg stirrups of 16 mm dia bar

Asw = 1206.37 mm2

Spacing of stirrups required ( s) = 137.69 mm

Minimum Shear Reinforcement Ratio: As per Clause 10.3.3.5 of IRC:112-2011


Asw = 0.072 * sqrt ( fck) = 0.000911
b*s fyk

Henc Maximum Spacing (s) = 353.23 mm

Check Maximum Spacing of Shear Reinforcement: As per Clause 16.5.2 , eq. 16.6 of IRC:112-2011

smax = 0.75 d = 1245.75 mm

Governing Spacing of Shear Reinforcement = 137.69 mm

Hence Provide the Spacing of Shear Reinforcement = 125 mm

DESIGN OF CAP ALONG LONGITUDNAL DIRECTION AS CORBEL

While designing the Corbel load on only one bearing is considered and the effective width of the pedestal for this load in the transverse
Note:
direction is calculated. For designing the Corbel maximum loads are considered.

Additional
Torsional
Left span Right span diff shear due to
moment
torsion
1.5 x (DL +SIDL)
= 391 1998 1606.48 1405.67 1354.05
2 x WC = 204 277 73.35 64.18 61.83
2.5 x LL with impact 1890 0 1889.73 1653.51 1592.79
1.5xDL+2xSIDL+2.5xLL 2485 2275 3123 3009

Actual horizontal force in normal case = 459.87 kN


Hence the effective width for this load is considered as ( b ) = 2500 mm

Vertical Load (Vu)


Total maximum Vertical Load " V u " 2484.53 kN

Horizontal Load (Hu)

Hu = 1.7 x actual horizontal force in working load condition


but not less than
= 0.2 * V u

Total maximum Horizontal Load " H u " 781.78 kN

NH-72A and NH-73 76 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Pier Cap-ULS

Now the design for the corbel is carried out as per the following steps.

STEP I
Check for Nominal Shear Strength

Ensure V u / b d < = 0.15 fc'

where; V u = 2484.53 kN
= 2.48E+06 N

bd = 2500 x 1563.75 sqmm


= 3.91E+06 mm2

V u /bd = 2484530.4 / 3909375

V u /bd = 0.64 N / mm2

fc' = 28 - day standard cylinder strength of concrete used.


= 0.80 times the standard cube strength
Grade of Concrete M 40
0.15 fc' = 0.15 x 0.8 x 40
= 4.80 N / mm2 Ensured

Hence V u / b d < = 0.15 fc' is Ensured

STEP II

Calculation of Shear Friction Reinforcement " A v f "

Vu
A vf =
0.85 fsy m

where; fsy = yeild stress value of the reinforcement used.


= 500.00 N/ mm2

Type of Surface m
1 Concrete placed monolithically across interface. 1.40
2 Concrete placed against hardened concrete but with roughened surface 1.00
3 Concrete anchored to structural steel 0.70
4 Concrete placed against hardened concrete but surface not roughened 0.60

Type of Surface ( 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 ) ? = 1.00

m = 1.40
( Note: Only monolithic construction is recommended )

2484.54 x 1000
A vf = mm2
0.85 x 500 x 1.4

A vf = 4175.68 mm2

STEP III

Calculation for Direct Tension Reinforcement " A t ".

Hu
At =
0.85 fsy

Hu = 781.78 kn

781.79 x 1000
At =
0.85 x 500

= 1839.49 mm2

NH-72A and NH-73 77 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Pier Cap-ULS

STEP IV

Calculation for Flexural Tension Reinforcement " A f "

[V u a + H u ( h - d' ) ]
Af =
0.85 fsy d

2484.54 x 1000 x 0 + 781.79 x 1000 ( 1800 - 1737.5 )


=
0.85 x 500 x 1563.75

= 73.52 mm2
STEP V

Total Primary Tensile Reinforcement " A s "

A s >= (Af+At) Provide the largest of


>= ( 2 / 3 A vf + A t ) these three
>= ( 0.04 fc' / fsy ) b d' magnitudes as As.

(Af+At) = 73.53 + 1839.49 mm2


= 1913.01 mm2

(2/3A vf +At) = mm2


2 / 3 x 4175.69 + 1839.49
= 4623.27 mm2

( 0.04 fc' / fsy ) b d' = 0.04 x 0.8 x 40 / 500 x 2500 x 1737.5


= 11120.00 mm2

Hence As = 11120.00 mm2

STEP VI

The total sectional area of the stirrups is " A h " (closed ties) to be provided horizontally, one below

the other, and next to " As "

A h >= 0.25 * A s Provide the largest of


these two magnitudes
>= 0.333 * A vf
as Ah.

0.25 * A s = 0.25 x 11120


= 2780.00 mm2

0.333*A vf = 0.333 x 4175.69


= 1390.50 mm2

Hence Ah = 2780.00 mm2

STEP VII
The total steel in vertical stirrups is " A v "

Vc = 10 bd in kgs where b & d are in cms


= 10 x 250 x 156.375
= 390937.50 kg
= 3909.38 kN
Pitch = 106.4 mm mm

A v = 0.50 * ( V u - V c ) * p
f sy d

= 0.5 x ( 2484.54 - 3909.38 ) x 106.41 x 1000


500 x 1737.5

Av = 0.00 mm2

NH-72A and NH-73 78 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Pier Cap-ULS

Reinforcement Details

Total Primary Tensile Reinforcement " A s "

As = 11120.00 mm2

Diameter of Primary Steel = 25 mm

Area of one bar = 490.87 mm2

Spacing of Bar = 100 mm c/c

A s provided =
= 12271.846 mm2 > As R/F is adequate

So we provide 100 mm c/c 25 mm diameter bars as main reinforcement

Horizontal Steel ( Closed Stirrups) " A h "

Ah = 2780.00 mm2

A h /m = 1112.00 mm2 /m

The stirrups shall be provided below As and within a depth of " 2 / 3 d' " below As.

2 / 3 d' = (2 / 3 ) x 1737.5
= 1159.00 mm

Diameter of Stirrup Bar = 12.00 mm

Area of one bar = 113.10 mm2

No. of layers of Stirrups = 3.00 nos.

Spacing of Stirrups = 386.33 mm

No. of legs of stirrups = 4.00

A h provided = 113.1 x 3 x 4
= 1357.17 mm2 > Ah R/F is adequate

So we provide 4 legged. 12 mm diameter bars as horizontal stirrups in 3 layers per meter width

Vertical Steel ( Closed Stirrups) " A v "

Av = 0.00 mm2

A v /m = 0.00 mm2 /m

Diameter of Stirrup Bar = 10.00 mm

Area of one bar = 78.54 mm2

Pitch = 106.4 mm mm

No. of legs of stirrups = 2.00

A h provided = 78.54 x 2
= 157.08 mm2 > Av R/F is adequate

So we provide2 legged. 10 mm diameter bars as vertical stirrups at 106 mm spacing per meter width

NH-72A and NH-73 79 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Stress Check For Pier Cap_New

Stress Check of Pier Cap

Summary of Load over Cantilever Portion of Cap: Rare Combination

Left Bearing Left Bearing


Moment
Factored Factored
Eccentricit Eccentricity (MT) @
Loads from superstructureLoad Factor Vertical load Vertical load
y (m) (m) face of pier
(kN) (kN)
(kNm)
DL 1.00 433.594 4.11 433.594 1.61 2483.428
SIDL without W.C. 1.00 333.731 4.11 -172.725 1.61 1094.155
Wearing Coat 1.20 97.680 4.11 122.100 1.61 598.875
LL 1.00 0.000 4.11 0.000 1.61 0.000
865.005 382.969 4176.458

Right Bearing Right Bearing


Moment
Factored Factored
Eccentricit Eccentricity (MT) @
Loads from superstructureLoad Factor Vertical load Vertical load
y (m) (m) face of pier
(kN) (kN)
(kNm)
DL 1.00 1262.972 3.61 1312.355 0.61 5369.581
SIDL without W.C. 1.00 140.000 3.61 19.500 0.61 517.897
Wearing Coat 1.20 152.269 3.61 166.112 0.61 652.222
LL 1.00 728.332 3.61 338.886 0.61 2840.027
2283.573 1836.854 9379.728

Left Bearing Right Bearing


Moment
Factored Factored
Eccentricit Eccentricity (MT) @
Vertical load Vertical load
y (m) (m) face of pier
(kN) (kN)
(kNm)
Weight of Pedestal 1.00 4.800 4.114 4.800 3.614 37.092
Weight of Tran. Seismic Arrestor
1.00 7.178 4.70 7.178 0.00 33.734
Weight of Long. Seismic Arrestor
1.00 11.375 2.75 5.688 3.61 51.835
Weight of Pedestal wall 1.00 216.316 2.63 0.000 0.00 567.831
Weight of Pier Cap 1.00 672.891 2.327 1565.719
912.560 17.665 2256.210

Total Flexural Moment ( M) = 15812.40 kNm

Torsional Moment and Shear Force

Torsional moment @ face of Pier ( T) = 3184.45 kNm

Flexural Torsional
Total Moment = + = 18996.84 kNm
Moment Moment

Maximum compressive stress in concrete under rare combination = 19.2 N/mm2


Maximum compressive stress in concrete under Quasi-Permenent = 14.4 N/mm2
Maximum tensile stress in steel in rare and quasi-permemenent case = 300 N/mm2

Section Properties of Uncracked Section:

width of section (Dx) = 3750.00 mm


Depth of Section (Dy) = 1800.00 mm
2
Gross Cross sectional area (Ag) = 6750000 mm

4
Gross Moment of Inertia Igxx = 1.82E+12 mm
4
Gross Moment of Inertia Igyy = 7.91E+12 mm

Calculation of Modular Ratio:


Perimeter of section (u) = 11100 mm
2 Ac/u = 1216.216 mm
For Dry atmosperic condition
Creep coeff. = 1.20
Eceff = Ecm = 1.52E+04
(1 + ø )

Modular Ratio (m) = Es/ Eceff = 13.20

2
Total Ast provided = 54688.84 mm

pt = Ast/(b*D) = 0.0088

NH-72A and NH-73 80 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Stress Check For Pier Cap_New

effective cover = 139.00 mm

C.g. Of Tension steel from N.A. (y) = 761.00 mm

2
Area of concrete, Ac = ( Ag- Ast) = 6695311.16 mm

2
Transformed Area of Section AstT = Ac + m Ast = 7416934.79 mm

Transformed M.O.I (Ixx) = Igxx+(m-1).Ast . y^2


= 1.82E+12 + 3.8624E+11
4
= 2.21E+12 mm

Section modulus (Zxx) = Ixx /( Dy/2)


3
= 2454151047 mm

2
Bending stress ( M/ Zxx ) = = 7.741 N/mm

2
Tensile strength of concrete , fctm = 3.03 N/mm Cracked

Sectional Properties of Cracked Section:


Stresses under Service load are usually within Linear Elastic Range hence such analysis involved use of Modulus ratio.

Effective Depth deff (dy) = 1661.00 mm


Depth of neutral axis ( yb) = k * dy
where , k - = sqrt{ 2 pt *m + (pt*m)^2 } - pt* m
= 0.3793

Depth of Neutral axis from Extreme compression face(yb) = 629.94 mm


Depth of Neutral axis from Extreme Tension face(yt) = 1170.06 mm
Depth of Neutral axis from c.g. of tesion steel (ys) = 1031.06 mm

Cracked Moment of Inertia ( Ixxcr) = Dx *(k * dy)^3/3 + m Ast * (dy - k * dy)^2


4
= 1.08E+12 mm
Stress in Rare Combination
2
Maximum compressive stress in concrete= Mxx/Ixxcr * yb = 11.08 N/mm < 19.2
SAFE
2
Maximum Tensile stress in concrete= Mxx/Ixxcr * yt = 20.59 N/mm > 3.03

2
Maximum Tensile stress in steel= m * Mxx/Ixxcr * ys = 239.39 N/mm < 300
SAFE

NH-72A and NH-73 81 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Crack check For Pier Cap

Crack Width Check of Pier Cap

Summary of Load over Cantilever Portion of Cap: Quasi-Permanent Combination

Left Bearing Left Bearing


Moment
Factored Factored
Eccentricity Eccentricity (MT) @
Loads from superstructure Load Factor Vertical load Vertical load
(m) (m) face of pier
(kN) (kN)
(kNm)
DL 1.00 433.594 4.11 433.594 1.61 2483.428
SIDL without W.C. 1.00 333.731 4.11 -172.725 1.61 1094.155
Wearing Coat 1.20 97.680 4.11 122.100 1.61 598.875
LL 0.00 0.000 4.11 0.000 1.61 0.000
865.005 382.969 4176.458

Left Bearing Left Bearing


Moment
Factored Factored
Eccentricity Eccentricity (MT) @
Loads from superstructure Load Factor Vertical load Vertical load
(m) (m) face of pier
(kN) (kN)
(kNm)
DL 1.00 1262.972 3.61 1312.355 0.61 5369.581
SIDL without W.C. 1.00 140.000 3.61 19.500 0.61 517.897
Wearing Coat 1.20 152.269 3.61 166.112 0.61 652.222
LL 0.00 0.000 3.61 0.000 0.61 0.000
1555.241 1497.967 6539.700

Left Bearing Right Bearing


Moment
Factored Factored
Eccentricity Eccentricity (MT) @
Vertical load Vertical load
(m) (m) face of pier
(kN) (kN)
(kNm)
Weight of Pedestal 1.00 4.800 4.114 4.800 3.614 37.092
Weight of Tran. Seismic Arrestor
1.00 7.178 4.70 7.178 0.00 33.734
Weight of Long. Seismic Arrestor
1.00 11.375 2.75 5.688 3.61 51.835
Weight of Pedestal wall 1.00 216.316 2.63 0.000 0.00 567.831
Weight of Pier Cap 1.00 672.891 2.327 1565.719
912.560 17.665 2256.210

Total Flexural Moment ( M) = 12972.37 kNm

Torsional Moment and Shear Force

Unbalance Long. Force responsible for Torsional moment @ face of Pier = 482.04 kN
Eccentricity of unbalance force = 0.875 m
Torsional moment @ face of Pier ( T) = 2117.23 kNm

Flexural Torsional
Total Moment = + = 15089.60 kNm
Moment Moment

Maximum compressive stress in concrete = 14.4 N/mm2

Maximum tensile stress in steel = 300 N/mm2

Section Properties of Uncracked Section:

width of section (Dx) = 3750.00 mm


Depth of Section (Dy) = 1800.00 mm
2
Gross Cross sectional area (Ag) = 6750000 mm

4
Gross Moment of Inertia Igxx = 1.82E+12 mm
4
Gross Moment of Inertia Igyy = 7.91016E+12 mm

Calculation of Modular Ratio:


Perimeter of section (u) = 11100 mm
2 Ac/u = 1216.216 mm
For Dry atmosperic condition
Creep coeff. = 1.20
Eceff = Ecm = 1.52E+04
(1 + ø )

Modular Ratio (m) = Es/ Eceff = 13.20

NH-72A and NH-73 82 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Crack check For Pier Cap

2
Total Ast provided = 54688.84 mm /m

pt = Ast/(b*D) = 0.0088

effective cover = 139.00 mm

C.g. Of Tension steel from N.A. (y) = 761.00 mm

2
Area of concrete, Ac = ( Ag- Ast) = 6695311.16 mm

2
Transformed Area of Section AstT = Ac + m Ast = 7416934.79 mm

Transformed M.O.I (Ixx) = Igxx+(m-1).Ast . y^2


= 1.82E+12 + 3.86236E+11
4
= 2.21E+12 mm

Section modulus (Zxx) = Ixx /( Dy/2)


3
= 2454151047 mm

2
Bending stress ( M/ Zxx ) = = 6.149 N/mm

2
Tensile strength of concrete , fctm = 3.03 N/mm Cracked

Sectional Properties of Cracked Section:


Stresses under Service load are usually within Linear Elastic Range hence such analysis involved use of Modulus ratio.

Effective Depth deff (dy) = 1661.00 mm


Depth of neutral axis ( yb) = k * dy
where , k - = sqrt{ 2 pt *m + (pt*m)^2 } - pt* m
= 0.3793

Depth of Neutral axis from Extreme compression face(yb) = 629.9372 mm


Depth of Neutral axis from Extreme Tension face(yt) = 1170.0628 mm
Depth of Neutral axis from c.g. of tesion steel (ys) = 1031.0628 mm

Cracked Moment of Inertia ( Ixxcr) = Dx *(k * dy)^3/3 + m Ast * (dy - k * dy)^2


4
= 1.0796E+12 mm

2
Maximum compressive stress in concrete= Mxx/Ixxcr * yb = 8.80 N/mm < 14.4
SAFE
2
Maximum Tensile stress in concrete= Mxx/Ixxcr * yt = 16.35 N/mm > 3.03

2
Maximum Tensile stress in steel= m * Mxx/Ixxcr * ys = 190.15 N/mm < 300
SAFE

Crack Width Check in Pier Cap

Depth = 1800.00 mm
Maximum Dia of Tension Reinf. = 32.00 mm
Effective width , deff = 1661.00 mm
2
Area of Steel on Tension, Ast = 54688.84 mm

Check for crack width : Refer Clause 12.3.4 of IRC:112-2011

Wk = Sr max (εsm - εcm)

Where, Sr max = maximum crack spacing


εsm = mean strain in the reinforcement
εcm = mean strain in concrete between cracks

Below Formula For Calculation of Sr max is applicable if the spacing between the reinf. is less or equal to
= 695.00 mm
5*(c+φ/2)
Provided Spacing of Reinf. On tension face = 106.41 mm Hence OK

Sr max = 3.4 c + 0.425 k1 k2 φ


r r eff

Clear Cover , c = 50 mm
Diameter of Main Bar , φ = 32 mm
Coefficient , k1 = 0.8 for Deformed bars
Coefficient , k2 = 0.5 for Bending
Depth of Neutral axis = 629.94 mm

NH-72A and NH-73 83 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT Crack check For Pier Cap

r r eff = As/Ac eff , where Ac,eff =effective area of concrete in tension surrounding the reinf.

hc eff = Min of 2.5 (Dy - dy ) ,Dy - yb/3 , Dy/2 = 347.50 mm

2
Ac, eff = Dx * hc,eff = 3750.00 x 347.50 = 1.30E+06 mm

r r eff = 0.042

Sr max = 170.00 + 129.62 = 299.62 mm

(εsm - εcm) = σsc - kt fct eff (1 + αe r r eff )


r r eff ≥ 0.6 ssc/Es
Es
Where ,
2
Stress in the tension reinf. = σsc = 190.15 N/mm from Quasi-Permanent Combination

kt = 0.50

Tensile strength of concrete = fct eff = fctm = 3.03 Mpa

2
αe = Es where , Es = 2.00E+05 N/mm
2
Ecm Ecm = 3.33E+04 N/mm

αe = 6.00
0.6 ssc/Es = 0.0006

(εsm - εcm) = 190.15 - 45.18 = 0.00072 OK


2.00E+05

Wk = 0.22 mm <0.3mm,SAFE

NH-72A and NH-73 84 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT ANNEXURE-I -CWLL
ANNEXURE-I ( LOAD CALCULATION-CARRIAGEWAY LIVE LOAD )

Maximum Live Load Reaction Case Nos. of Lane for design purpose = 3 LANE
Due to Class A 1-Lane , 2-Lanes, 3-Lanes & 4-Lanes
Considering 114.00 kN
(I.e. 0.000m from extreme Left End)
Length of the Span = 38.00 m
Projection beyond cL of bearing at Abut. end = 0.975 m
Projection beyond cL of bearing at far end = 0.975 m
Total length including Overhangs = 39.95 m

A B
0.975 38.000 m 0.975

RA RB
Pier Pier

Axle Load Spacing Distance Distance Total Reactions (without Impact) for 1 Lane
between of the axles of the axles Moment of Description At Supp-A At Supp-B
two from from the all Loads Reaction Reaction RA RB
in kN successive Extreme Support @ Support at Support at Support Reaction in kN 437.650 62.350
axles Left Node A A A B
in metres in metres in metres in kN-m in kN in kN
Ist Train Total Load 500.0kN

437.650 62.350
114.000 3.200 0.000 -0.975 -111.150
114.000 1.200 1.200 0.225 25.650
68.000 4.300 5.500 4.525 307.700
68.000 3.000 8.500 7.525 511.700
68.000 3.000 11.500 10.525 715.700
68.000 3.000 14.500 13.525 919.700

Due to Class 70R Wheeled


Considering 170.00 kN
(I.e. 0.000m from extreme Left End)
Length of the Span = 38.00 m
Projection beyond cL of bearing at Abut. end = 0.975 m
Projection beyond cL of bearing at far end = 0.975 m
Total length including Overhangs = 39.95 m

A B
0.975 38.000 m 0.975

RA RB
Pier Pier

Axle Load Spacing Distance Distance Total


between of the axles of the axles Moment of
two from from the all Loads Reaction Reaction
in kN successive Extreme Support @ Support at Support at Support
axles Left Node A A A B
in metres in metres in metres in kN-m in kN in kN
Ist Train Total Load 1000.0kN
170.000 0.000 -0.975 -165.750
170.000 1.370 1.370 0.395 67.150 890.821 109.179
170.000 3.050 4.420 3.445 585.650
170.000 1.370 5.790 4.815 818.550 Reactions (without Impact) for 70R Wheeled
120.000 2.130 7.920 6.945 833.400 Description At Supp-A At Supp-B
120.000 1.520 9.440 8.465 1015.800 RA RB
80.000 3.960 13.400 12.425 994.000 Reaction in kN 890.821 109.179

Due to Class A 1-Lane/2-Lane (along with Class 70R)


Considering 68.00 kN
(I.e. 0.000m from extreme Left End)
Length of the Span = 38.00 m
Projection beyond cL of bearing at Abut. end = 0.975 m
Projection beyond cL of bearing at far end = 0.975 m
Total length including Overhangs = 39.95 m

A B
0.975 38.000 m 0.975

RA RB
Pier Pier
Axle Load Spacing Distance Distance Total
between of the axles of the axles Moment of
two from from the all Loads Reaction Reaction
in kN successive Extreme Support @ Support at Support at Support
axles Left Node A A A B
in metres in metres in metres in kN-m in kN in kN
Ist Train Total Load 554.0kN Reactions (without Impact) for 1 Lane
68.000 0.000 -0.975 -66.300 Description At Supp-A At Supp-B
68.000 3.000 3.000 2.025 137.700 426.670 127.330 RA RB
68.000 3.000 6.000 5.025 341.700 Reaction in kN 426.670 127.330
68.000 3.000 9.000 8.025 545.700
114.000 4.300 13.300 12.325 1405.050
114.000 1.200 14.500 13.525 1541.850
27.000 3.200 17.700 16.725 451.575
27.000 1.100 18.800 17.825 481.275

NH-72A and NH-73 85 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT ANNEXURE-I -CWLL

Due to Class SV Loading


Considering 180.00 kN
(I.e. 0.000m from extreme Left End)
Length of the Span = 38.00 m
Projection beyond cL of bearing at Abut. end = 0.975 m
Projection beyond cL of bearing at far end = 0.975 m
Total length including Overhangs = 39.950 m

A B
0.975 38.000 m 0.975

RA RB
Pier Pier
Axle Load Spacing Distance Distance Total
between of the axles of the axles Moment of
two from from the all Loads Reaction Reaction
in kN successive Extreme Support @ Support at Support at Support
axles Left Node A A A B
in metres in metres in metres in kN-m in kN in kN
Ist Train Total Load 4680.0kN Reactions for SV Loading
180.000 0.000 -0.975 -175.500 Description At Supp-A At Supp-B
180.000 1.500 1.500 0.525 94.500 2490.868 2189.132 RA RB
180.000 1.500 3.000 2.025 364.500 Reaction in kN 2490.868 2189.132
180.000 1.500 4.500 3.525 634.500
180.000 1.500 6.000 5.025 904.500
180.000 1.500 7.500 6.525 1174.500
180.000 1.500 9.000 8.025 1444.500
180.000 1.500 10.500 9.525 1714.500
180.000 1.500 12.000 11.025 1984.500
180.000 1.500 13.500 12.525 2254.500
180.000 1.500 15.000 14.025 2524.500
180.000 1.500 16.500 15.525 2794.500
180.000 1.500 18.000 17.025 3064.500
180.000 1.500 19.500 18.525 3334.500
180.000 1.500 21.000 20.025 3604.500
180.000 1.500 22.500 21.525 3874.500
180.000 1.500 24.000 23.025 4144.500
180.000 1.500 25.500 24.525 4414.500
180.000 1.500 27.000 26.025 4684.500
180.000 1.500 28.500 27.525 4954.500
180.000 1.500 30.000 29.025 5224.500
180.000 1.500 31.500 30.525 5494.500
180.000 1.500 33.000 32.025 5764.500
180.000 1.500 34.500 33.525 6034.500
180.000 1.500 36.000 35.025 6304.500
180.000 1.500 37.500 36.525 6574.500

Deck Width = 12.500 m

SV LOAD
transverse ecc. = 0.400 m
Maximum Reaction (RA) = 2490.868 KN Corr. MT = 996.347 kNm
Minimum Reaction (RB) = 2189.132 KN Corr. MT = 875.653 kNm

1-CLASS A
transverse ecc. = 6.25 -0.5 -0.4 -0.9 0 0 = 4.45 m
Maximum Reaction (RA) = 437.650 KN Corr. MT = 1947.543 kNm
Minimum Reaction (RB) = 62.350 KN Corr. MT = 277.458 kNm

2-CLASS A
transverse ecc. = 6.25 -0.5 -0.4 -1.8 -0.85 0 = 2.70 m
Maximum Reaction (RA) = 875.300 KN Corr. MT = 2363.310 kNm
Minimum Reaction (RB) = 124.700 KN Corr. MT = 336.690 kNm

3-CLASS A
transverse ecc. = 6.25 -0.5 -0.4 -1.8 -1.7 -0.9 = 0.95 m
Maximum Reaction (RA) = 1312.950 KN Corr. MT = 1247.303 kNm
Minimum Reaction (RB) = 187.050 KN Corr. MT = 177.698 kNm

4-CLASS A
transverse ecc. = 6.25 -0.5 -0.4 -1.8 -1.7 -1.8 -0.85 = -0.8 m
Maximum Reaction (RA) = 1750.600 KN Corr. MT = -1400.480 kNm
Minimum Reaction (RB) = 249.400 KN Corr. MT = -199.520 kNm

1- 70RW
Transverse Ecc. for 70RW = 6.25 -0.5 -1.2 -1.395 = 3.155 m

Maximum Reaction (RA) = 890.821 KN Corr. MT = 2811


Minimum Reaction (RB) = 109.179 KN Corr. MT = 344

1-CLASS A + 1-70RW 3 LANE


Transverse Ecc. for Class A = 6.25 -0.5 -0.4 -0.9 = 4.45 m
for 70RW = 6.25 -0.5 -0.4 -1.8 -0.25 -1.8 -1.395 = 0.105

Maximum Reaction (RA) = 1317.491 KN Corr. MT = 426.67 x 4.45 + 890.82 x 0.105 = 1992
Minimum Reaction (RB) = 236.509 KN Corr. MT = 127.330 4.45 + 109.179 0.105 = 578

2-CLASS A + 1-70RW 4 LANE


Transverse Ecc. for 1st Class A = 4.45 m
for 2nd Class A = 4.45 -0.9 -0.85 0 = 2.7 m
for 70RW = 2.7 -0.9 -0.25 -1.8 -0.25 -1.2 -1.395 = -3.095

NH-72A and NH-73 86 PIER-P3


Design Calculation ICT ANNEXURE-I -CWLL
Maximum Reaction (RA) = 1744.161 KN Corr. MT = 426.67 x 4.45 + 426.67 x 2.700 = 294
+ 890.82 x -3.095

Minimum Reaction (RB) = 363.839 KN Corr. MT = 127.330 4.45 + 127.33 x 2.700 = 573
+ 109.18 x -3.095

1- 70RW + 1-CLASS A - 3 LANE


Transverse Ecc. for 70RW = 6.3 -0.5 -1.2 -1.395 = 3.155 m
for Class A = 6.3 -0.5 -7.25 -0.25 -0.9 = -2.650 m

Maximum Reaction (RA) = 1317.491 KN Corr. MT = 890.82 x 3.155 + 426.67 x -2.650 = 1680
Minimum Reaction (RB) = 236.509 KN Corr. MT = 109.179 3.155 + 127.330 -2.650 = 7

1- 70RW + 2-CLASS A - 4 LANE


Transverse Ecc. for 70RW = 3.155 m
for 1st Class A = -2.650 m
for 2nd Class A = -2.650 -0.9 -0.85 = -4.400 m

Maximum Reaction (RA) = 1744.161 KN Corr. MT = 890.82 x 3.155 + 426.67 x -2.650 = -197
+ 426.67 x -4.400

Minimum Reaction (RB) = 363.839 KN Corr. MT = 109.179 3.155 + 127.330 -2.650 = -553
+ 127.33 x -4.400

Summary of Reaction and Corresponding moments

Reaction Reaction Corr. MT


Max Reaction Cases Corr. MT (kNm)
(RA) , (kN) RB, , (kN) (kNm)
1-CLASS A 437.650 1947.543 62.350 277.458
2-CLASS A 875.300 2363.310 124.700 336.690
3-CLASS A 1312.950 1247.303 187.050 177.698
4-CLASS A 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1- 70RW 890.821 2810.540 109.179 344.460
1-CLASS A + 1-70RW 1317.491 1992.217 236.509 578.083
1- 70RW + 1-CLASS A 1317.491 1679.866 236.509 7.034
2-CLASS A + 1-70RW 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1- 70RW + 2-CLASS A 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Maximum Reaction & Corresponding Transverse Moment


Reaction RA = 1317.491 KN & Corresponding moment = 1992.217 kNm
Reaction RB = 236.509 KN & Corresponding moment = 578.083 kNm

Maximum Transverse Moment & Corresponding Reaction


Reaction RA = 890.821 KN & Max moment = 2810.540 kNm
Reaction RB = 109.179 KN & Max moment = 344.460 kNm

NH-72A and NH-73 87 PIER-P3

Potrebbero piacerti anche