Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Ms. Gardner
English 10H/Period 5
28 November 2017
by Jessica Bomarito and Russel Whitaker, vol. 170, Gale, 2006. 19th Century Literature
Criticism Online,
go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=GLS&sw=w&u=k12_lcoall&v=2.1&id=GALE%7CRSTTBC42
7511128&it=r. Originally published in Quarterly Review, vol. 18, no. 36, Jan. 1818, pp.
379-385.
John Wilson Croker, an Irish statesman and author, presents the reader of his criticism on
Frankenstein with a lengthy summary of the novel’s plot, followed by three passages that
“struck” him the most upon his “perusal” of the novel. Witty comments and allusions litter
Croker’s plot summary, which help to strengthen his opinion on the events in the book, and
his analysis on the three provided passages conveys his skepticism towards the novel’s
themes.
Croker confronts Mary Shelley’s work so viciously that his tone almost becomes humorous,
as he attacks the author, stating her novel is “nonsense.” However, he continues to say that,
“it is nonsense decked out with circumstances and clothed in language highly terrific.”
While impressed by Shelley’s elevated diction, Croker is clearly not a fan of the horrific but
fantastical adventures of Frankenstein and his monster, and his opinions are boldly stated
in his writing. Ultimately, this article fails to bring any “bigger picture” ideas to the table
and, while entertaining, only amounts to the equivalent of a Rotten Tomatoes review from
the 1800s.
Geller, Allegra. “Women and Empire – Mary Shelley.” The British Scholar Society, 30 Apr. 2012,
britishscholar.org/publications/2012/04/30/women-and-empire-mary-shelley/.
This article, written by Allegra Geller, columnist for The British Scholar Society, is a
Shelley’s life, Geller illustrates all the joyous and tragic events in Shelley’s life, from the
publication of Frankenstein, to the death of her husband, Percy Bysshe Shelley, all while
The article, while beginning and ending with commentary, mainly focuses on the pure
facts surrounding Shelley’s life, with very little embellishment whatsoever. This is striking,
as Shelley’s life seems to be paralleled to the chaotic one of Victor Frankenstein, the
protagonist in her own novel. From the death of her children, parents, and spouse, to her
recurring illnesses, Shelley grows up to be the character she created when she was twenty
years old. This article almost hands this conclusion to the reader, not by exaggerating events
in Shelley’s life, but by retelling it as the captivating, tragic tale that it truly is.
Rettew, David. “Nature Versus Nurture: Where We Are in 2017.” Psychology Today, 6 Oct. 2017,
www.psychologytoday.com/blog/abcs-child-psychiatry/201710/nature-versus-nurture-where-we-
are-in-2017.
David Rettew’s article breaks the ideas of nature and nurture down into three sections, and
chronologically follows the history of the debate between these two ideas. Rettew,
a child psychiatrist at the University of Vermont, discusses the history of nature and nurture and
how the perceived relationship between these concepts has changed over time, starting in
ancient Greece, traveling through the 1800s, and ending in the present, 2017.
Only becoming too clinically and medically advanced as to be confusing a couple of times,
Rettew otherwise keeps his article very easy to understand and follow, simply breaking it into
three brilliantly named and cohesive sections: “Nature Versus Nurture,” “Nature and Nurture,”
and “Nature Is Nurture (and vice versa).” Rettew concludes the debate between nature or
nurture determining a child’s behavior by stating that the two are intertwined, as one can
affect the other, and vice versa. This ending statement awakens a new thought in the reader’s
mind: that Frankenstein’s monster’s actions and behavior could have only been a result of the
way others treated him (nurture), as the being is not of any natural origin, thus nature being
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. “On Frankenstein. ” Frankenstein, Chelsea House, 2007. Bloom's Literature,
online.infobase.com/HRC/Search/Details/1835?q=Frankenstein.
Percy Shelley’s article provides enlightening analysis and commentary on the emotional tones
and the use of pathos in Frankenstein. Shelley, husband of Mary Shelley, the author of
Frankenstein, also presents a riveting moral of the story, being “Treat a person ill, and he will
become wicked.” This moral provides further insight, inspecting how Frankenstein’s
monster’s actions are possibly justified through his cruel treatment.
Shelley provides many exceptional examples from the novel to prove his point that the author
uses an emotional tone and employs pathos throughout the story to connect the reader with
both Frankenstein and his monster’s struggles. This article takes scenes from the novel, dissects
and examines them, and then presents the reader with a fascinating autopsy of the novel. This
autopsy reveals the moral of the story, enlightening the reader of the ultimate purpose of this
novel: through using a unique, creative, and original narrative, to state that the ways a person is
treated is reflected in their actions, gentle or monstrous, friendly or wicked, good or evil.