100%(1)Il 100% ha trovato utile questo documento (1 voto)
264 visualizzazioni10 pagine
Contemporary American society, with its emphasis on mobility and economic progress, all too often loses sight of the importance of a sense of “place” and community. Appreciating place is essential for building the strong local communities that cultivate civic engagement, public leadership, and many of the other goods that contribute to a flourishing human life.
Do we, in losing our places, lose the crucial basis for healthy and resilient individual identity, and for the cultivation of public virtues? For one can’t be a citizen without being a citizen of some place in particular; one isn’t a citizen of a motel. And if these dangers are real and present ones, are there ways that intelligent public policy can begin to address them constructively, by means of reasonable and democratic innovations that are likely to attract wide public support?
Why Place Matters takes these concerns seriously, and its contributors seek to discover how, given the American people as they are, and American economic and social life as it now exists — and not as those things can be imagined to be in some utopian scheme — we can find means of fostering a richer and more sustaining way of life. The book is an anthology of essays exploring the contemporary problems of place and placelessness in American society.
Edited by the historians Wilfred M. McClay and Ted V. McAllister, Why Place Matters includes contributions from distinguished scholars and writers such as poet Dana Gioia (former chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts), geographer Yi-Fu Tuan, urbanist Witold Rybczynski, architect Philip Bess, essayists Christine Rosen and Ari N. Schulman, philosopher Roger Scruton, transportation planner Gary Toth, and historians Russell Jacoby and Joseph Amato. Source: The New Atlantis
Contemporary American society, with its emphasis on mobility and economic progress, all too often loses sight of the importance of a sense of “place” and community. Appreciating place is essential for building the strong local communities that cultivate civic engagement, public leadership, and many of the other goods that contribute to a flourishing human life.
Do we, in losing our places, lose the crucial basis for healthy and resilient individual identity, and for the cultivation of public virtues? For one can’t be a citizen without being a citizen of some place in particular; one isn’t a citizen of a motel. And if these dangers are real and present ones, are there ways that intelligent public policy can begin to address them constructively, by means of reasonable and democratic innovations that are likely to attract wide public support?
Why Place Matters takes these concerns seriously, and its contributors seek to discover how, given the American people as they are, and American economic and social life as it now exists — and not as those things can be imagined to be in some utopian scheme — we can find means of fostering a richer and more sustaining way of life. The book is an anthology of essays exploring the contemporary problems of place and placelessness in American society.
Edited by the historians Wilfred M. McClay and Ted V. McAllister, Why Place Matters includes contributions from distinguished scholars and writers such as poet Dana Gioia (former chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts), geographer Yi-Fu Tuan, urbanist Witold Rybczynski, architect Philip Bess, essayists Christine Rosen and Ari N. Schulman, philosopher Roger Scruton, transportation planner Gary Toth, and historians Russell Jacoby and Joseph Amato. Source: The New Atlantis
Contemporary American society, with its emphasis on mobility and economic progress, all too often loses sight of the importance of a sense of “place” and community. Appreciating place is essential for building the strong local communities that cultivate civic engagement, public leadership, and many of the other goods that contribute to a flourishing human life.
Do we, in losing our places, lose the crucial basis for healthy and resilient individual identity, and for the cultivation of public virtues? For one can’t be a citizen without being a citizen of some place in particular; one isn’t a citizen of a motel. And if these dangers are real and present ones, are there ways that intelligent public policy can begin to address them constructively, by means of reasonable and democratic innovations that are likely to attract wide public support?
Why Place Matters takes these concerns seriously, and its contributors seek to discover how, given the American people as they are, and American economic and social life as it now exists — and not as those things can be imagined to be in some utopian scheme — we can find means of fostering a richer and more sustaining way of life. The book is an anthology of essays exploring the contemporary problems of place and placelessness in American society.
Edited by the historians Wilfred M. McClay and Ted V. McAllister, Why Place Matters includes contributions from distinguished scholars and writers such as poet Dana Gioia (former chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts), geographer Yi-Fu Tuan, urbanist Witold Rybczynski, architect Philip Bess, essayists Christine Rosen and Ari N. Schulman, philosopher Roger Scruton, transportation planner Gary Toth, and historians Russell Jacoby and Joseph Amato. Source: The New Atlantis
Wilfred M. McClay &
Ted V. McAllister, editors
Wuy PLAce MATTERS
Geography, Identity, and Civic Life in Modern America
ce)
New Atlantis Books
ixcounTeR BOOKS - NEW YORK -LONDONINTRODUCTION
Why Place Matters
Witerep M. McCLay
‘Tue MosT FAMOUS WoRDS about the city of Oakland, Caliomi
‘ame from the pen of Gertrude Stein. There was, she declared, no
“there” there? This line has been widely understood as acasualy dis
‘missive judgment upon that clty, and it has been used and reused
‘countless times, a a barb directed ata variety of objects. Unfortu~
nately, her quip Isalso the chief thing that many people, patialaziy|
rnon-Califoniane, are likely to know about Oakland. Is beier-of|
neighbor Berkley, home of the most eminent ofthe Univerity af
California campuses, and always eager to demonstrate its cultural
lan, has even cested a genly witty piece of public art called
“HERETHERE” that plays on Stes words? The installation stands
atthe border of th tw cites, with the word "HERE" onthe Berkeley
side, and the word “THERE” on the Oakland side. As you might
‘expec, Onklanders dont much like it There has even been & party
rebellion, soto speak in which an intrepid army of Knitters covered
up the “T* on the Oakland side witha huge and elaborate tes-ozy?
“This is how they conduct cultural warfare inthe Bay Area, where
‘some people clea have too much time on their hands,2-INtRopucrion
Yet the irony ofall is that when Stein penned those words in her
sutoblogrophy, they were net meaat ass snappy put-down, She wea
{hinking of vrei ent dterent, Ouland had ben extremely
important to her when she ved there asa child asa ae stable place
THE PLACES oF our Lives
‘Aihough Place” isthe most general of words, the things to which it
aims Ate very specific “Place” asa concept is highly abavocy a
phces in particular are concrete palpable, intimately ‘meaningful.
ach plc is diferent. ach of wcomes from jas such «pare arWay PLACE MATTERS 3
and unreproducible somewhere, and considers someplace (or places)
cea
Eich of us knows, too, that“a sense of place” is as much an achieve.
‘mentas given condition. Although one could ague that “place” is
‘ukimately merely a point on some coordinate system, such a fit
footed assertion misses the inherently phenomenological character
‘ofplace. Which explains why not al places are equal, and some places
seem to us to be more filly “places” than others. In afrenetialy
‘mobile and ever more porous and inexorably globalizing world, we
stand powerflly in need of such stable and coherent places in our
lives—to ground us and orient us, and mark off finite aren, eich
with memory, for our activity as parents and children, as fiends and
‘neighbors, anda free and productive citizens.
‘And we know thatthe sens of place, even when itis very strong,
's also very fragile and easly lost Steins famous line about Oakland
{is testinony to that. By the same token, the ghostly imprint ofa sense
‘of place may persist even when the physical conditions for it have
Vanished, lke the sensations that linger after limb has been amp
tated. Sach isthe uterly quotidian incident described ina haunting
litle colamn that Veriyn Klinkenborg wrote several years ago forthe
"New York Times a demonstration that the sente of place ean apply
‘specidly powerfully to the most commonplace and unremarkable
thingsThe column was a response tothe dosing ofa Korean market
In his neighborhood—not an event of obvious importance, and yet
‘iinkenborg found himself maintaining ‘a mental map” of the place:
‘now just where the seltzer sin a store that no longer exists,
‘ean walk straight tothe died pineapple, but onl ia the past.
Some art ofme had quietly made an inventory ofthe necesites—
‘the analgesics and toothbrushes and smal shampoos—that had
‘migrated tothe front counter, which was a drugstore in tel
"Ther ate ute places to buy all hese things and not far away
Batihere is stil a perfectly good Korean marke in my head.
‘We carry wit us these fotprins of vanished places: apart-4 -Iwrropucrion
rents we moved out of years ago, drycleaners that went out
‘of business, restaurants that stopped serving, reighborhoods
where only the street names remain the same. Tiss the long-
‘gone geography of New York. I look up atthe bullings and
‘ny to imagine al the ives that have passed thrcugh them*
‘Weare somtimesle he concludes. in the strange postion oknow-
{ng our way around a world that ean no longer be und
‘What tink and Klinkenborg acounts share istheir depiction of
an ordinary but disquieting phenomenon: the tarslation of place
fnto space—the tansformation of @seting tha! had once been
charged with human meaning into on fom whick the meaning bas
departed, something empty and ine a mere space We allhae expe
rienced this some of us many times. Think ofthe sange emotion we
fee when we ae moving out ofthe place where we have been living,
and we finish dearing all ou belongings ou ofthe partment othe
house orth dorm room-and we ook back ait ore last ime, 0 se
4 space that use tobe the center of our wold, reduced to nothing
‘ut Barewalls and bare lor. Even when there ar few remaining
signs of our time there—fading was pockmarked with nll hoes,
scuffs inthe floor, spots onthe earpet—they serve en to render the
‘moment more pignant, since we know that thete small nures to
te propery wilson be painted over and tied up, so tha inthe
fallnes of ime there willbe no trace lft of usin ht spot.
BLURRING DISTINCTIVENESS
One should not be too melodramatic about this. Such changes and
transitions, however painful they may sometimes be, are part of a
healthy and dynamic human existence. What is diferent now is not
that they happen but that they have become so pervasive reflecting a
social and psychological uidty that seems to markour times As we
have become ever more mobile and more connected and absorbed in
«panoply of things that are not immediatly presen tous, our actualWHY PLACE MATTERS -5
sa tangible places seem es andes important to ws, nore and more
transient or provisional or interchangeable or even dspossble. The
pun of parting becomes les precisely because there so ite reason
{overt oneslin plac” to begin with Sometimes i almos seems
2s if we are ving ke plants witout roos, drawing our sustenance
sot from the ears beneath our fet but fom the satelite that enet-
‘deus and the conputer clouds tha ed and absorb our energies.
Iebas not ves been thus of nurse and we forget how rceniy
things wer, as tey had ben frm the beginning of tine, sent
ceely diferent. twas not much more than a century ago that the
lvesof most Americans were confined within narrowlocal adn
whathistorian Robert Wiebe reveling called island communites™
‘Theabiltyofthee and communities andthe individuals who com
pried them to communicate acoslarge distances waslinited bythe
Vas seas of pace and ine—by the dances that sepanted them and
the immense tie it took to taverse those datances. The term “real
time’ tothe extent would have ad any meaning al referred to
sec local time, measured by reference tothe sus reaching ts
‘zenithat tha partcular locaton Fa frm being pz or an enigma,
‘ond “place inthe word” was a given for a great may, f not most,
‘men and women With re exception, the person tt one Became
an the life that oe lived were nextel kinked to the geographical
locaton where one wasbomn and raised Such ators reained even
cone moved, as Americans shways have since on origins lingered on
asa structural ma of one wordy existence, nearyashard and fst
1s on bologialmakeup. On could only mov ofan fas.
Buta cascading ara oftechoologial and soll innovations has,
with atonehing ped readered those considerations beset Ine
pensive travel and instantaneous telecommmunicatons have almost
climinated the isolation of provincial Ie everywhere in the world,
snd resulted in the unprecedented mobility of bot ndividuas and
cate populations, the burrng of atonal lentes ad poroasness
of boundaries, andthe rlenlss global Gow of labor, apt, and
goods. ll thse forces erase distances and erode barriers that ad6 -inrropuerion
formerly been considered an inescapable part ofthe human condl-
‘on. And the term "rel time” now refers, not to local time, but ots
‘opposite—the possibilty of near-universal simltaneity, 3 that for
‘example, Ican have a lively conversation in “ral time" with anyone
‘on any part ofthe planet.
‘This revolution should be a surprise tows, sine it has been com:
{ng at us steadily ever since the invention of the locomotive and the
telegraph. And make no mistake, there is much to celebrate in these
developments. They give crucial support to one of the most powerful
and fundamental, and universally appealing, of all American ideas:the
{idea of freedom, We embrace freedom because we believe fervent in
the fllest breadth of individual human possibility, and share a dep
conviction that no one horizons in ie shouldbe dictated by the con-
Atons of his or he birth. Nothing i more quintessentially American
‘han that conviction, But interestingly, the word "pace rae plays any
role in this freedom narrative and infact, what oeit plays ends tobe
agate. One’ place of origin is seen aan impediment, something to
be overcome. Place” may even point toward notions of social hieat-
hy that Americans generally find anathema, Many of us can sill
‘remember when the idea of “knowing your place” was sed to promote
‘aca segregation and the social and legal subordination of women,
But very litle of thats relevant anymore and it would be a grave
‘ror to think thatthe problems of the pat are the same as these
today. We now have a new set of problems, which have been engen-
ered precisely by our dazaing achievements. One of those problems
fs the widespread sense that something is now seriously out of tal:
sncein the way we liv, All the technological wizardry end indivieal
‘empowerment have unsettled all facets of Le and given rise to pro=
found feelings of disquiet and insecurity in many Americans No one
«an yet reckon the human costs of uch radical changes, but they may
‘wm out tobe far higher than we have imagined.
Accompanying this disqulet isa gnawing sense that something
‘rnportant in our fundamental human nature is being lost, ebandoned
‘or surified inthis headlong rush and that this somthing” remainsWHY PLACE MATTERS -7
ist as vital to our fll ourishng as human beings as it was in the
times when we had fr fewer choices on offer. Coulditbe the case that
{he plbal-scleinterconnectednes of things may be comlngat too high
‘price Could it be the case thatthe variety and spontaneous diver-
sly of the world as we have known it fr all the prior centuries of
‘human history is being gradually leveled and effaced, and insensibiy
‘transformed into something standardized, artical, oles pastless,
and bland—a world of interchangeable airport terminals and fran.
chise hotels and restaurants, a world of smooth surfices designed to
‘aclitate perpetual movement rather than rooted fourishing? A word
‘ofspace rather than place in which there ae no “there” there?
Could it be the case that one ofthe chief things neglected by this
_ettern of ceaseless movement is precisely the opportinity to liv dig-
nifed and purposeful les of self government and civc engagement,
thekindoflives that thinkers since theme of Aristotle have regarded
‘asthe highest expression of human flourishing? Isthe livin of such
lives even conceivable in a world without "theres"?
"These concems should not be confused with fecings of nostalgi,
such a8 one finds in sentimental discourse about lat “community”
fen emanating from individuals who would not for asecond tolerate
‘thekind of constraints on individual Uberty that thick” communities
ofthe past always required, For better or worse, while wholesale roll
back of modernity may be concelvable asa thought experiment, itis
simply not a serious practical option. But that does net mean accept-
lngan unacceptable status quo, in which human flourishing itself is
rendered imposible Instead, we should seek to discever how, given
the American people a they are, and American ecancmic and socal
life si now exsts—and not as those things canbe imagined to be —
_weaan find means of resisting the steady homogenization ofthe world
‘This means cutvaing a strong sense of place wherever we find it—
‘and thereby cultivating the human goods that depend epon an endur-
{ng tense of place and ae imposible without it.8 -1wrropuerron
LIVING “PLaces™
Je bth titel and ts Sigurative meanings, “place” refers not only
‘0 geographal spot but toa defined niche inthe socil order, one
‘hac in the werd. Thus, when we say that we have “found ou place”
[We are speaking not only of «physical location, but ofthe achiene,
Bat any effort afrm the importance of place bringt us int ten
sion with the same forces that are shrinking and trans-