Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

#671
COMPLETE
Collector: Web Link 1 (Web Link)
Started: Sunday, April 15, 2018 9:34:07 PM
Last Modified: Sunday, April 15, 2018 9:53:47 PM
Time Spent: 00:19:39
IP Address: 68.131.82.119

Page 1: Placement Information

Q1 Student Teacher's Name

Elizabeth Rohr

Q2 Student Teacher's Endorsement Area Elementary Education, PreK-

6

Q3 Grade Taught Kindergarten

Q4 Internship Start Date (MM/DD/YYYY)

03-12-18

Q5 Internship End Date (MM/DD/YYYY)

05-04-18

Q6 School of Student Teaching Placement

Greenbrier Primary

Q7 School Division Chesapeake Public Schools

Q8 Evaluator's Name (First Last)

Courtney Waterfield

Q9 Evaluator's Email. We will return a PDF copy of your report to this address.

Email Address: courtney.waterfield@cpschools.com

1/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q10 Evaluator's Position/Role Classroom Teacher

Q11 What time period is this evaluation for? Mid-Term

Page 2: Standard One: Professional Knowledge

Q12 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Demonstrates accurate knowledge and skills of the subject area(s) Superior

taught.
Demonstrates an understanding of the development of the age Superior
group.
Integrates key content elements and facilitates students’ use of Superior
higher level thinking skills.
Links content with other subject areas and real world applications. Superior

Q13 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall performance in the area of professional knowledge.

Elizabeth has incorporated the Virginia SOL's and Chesapeake's Essential Knowledge in all of her plans.

Page 3: Standard Two: Instructional Planning

Q14 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Aligns lesson objectives to the school’s curriculum and student Exemplary

learning needs.
Develops appropriate plans designed to meet all learner needs; Superior
adapts plans as needed.
Plans time realistically for pacing, content mastery, and Exemplary
transitions.
Plans for differentiated instruction. Superior

Q15 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional planning.

Elizabeth has been doing well differentiating instruction as needed during reading and math lessons.

Page 4: Standard Three: Instructional Delivery

2/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q16 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Engages and maintains students in active learning. Superior

Differentiates instruction to meet the students’ needs. Superior
Reinforces learning goals consistently throughout lessons. Superior
Uses a variety of effective instructional strategies and resources. Exemplary
Uses instructional technology to enhance student learning. Superior

Q17 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional delivery.

Elizabeth has begun using different strategies to keep the children engaged and focused. It has made a positive impact keeping them
on-task and more productive during lessons.

Page 5: Standard Four: Assessment of and for Student Learning

Q18 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Uses student learning data to make instructional decisions. Superior

Uses a variety of appropriate assessment strategies and Superior
instruments
Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative Superior
purposes.
Gives constructive and frequent student feedback. Exemplary

Q19 Please comment on the teacher candidate's performance in the area of assessment of and for student learning.

Immediate feedback is given to students as they work and helps guide future lessons.

Page 6: Standard Five: Learning Environment

Q20 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Establishes clear expectations for classroom rules and Superior

procedures; enforces them consistently and fairly.
Uses available resources and knowledge of students to prevent, Superior
redirect, or reinforce behaviors.
Respects students’ diversity, including language, culture, race, Superior
gender, and special needs.
Actively listens and pays attention to students’ needs and Exemplary
responses.

Q21 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness in creating an environment conducive to
learning.

Elizabeth is excellent at listening to students and making sure that they know she is invested in what they have to say.

3/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Page 7: Standard Six: Professionalism

Q22 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Modifies performance based on personal and professional Exemplary

critiques.
Demonstrates initiative in planning, management, and Superior
professional interactions.
Demonstrates effective communication and collaboration with Superior
teachers and other school personnel.
Fosters trust in all school relationships through fair and ethical Superior
interactions.

Q23 Please comment on the teacher candidate's professionalism throughout the period of observation.

I appreciate that Elizabeth will adjust lessons as needed based on my feedback and on how the children are understanding the content.

Page 8: Standard Seven: Student Academic Progress

Q24 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Documents the progress of each student throughout the Superior

placement.
Provides evidence that achievement goals have been met. Superior
Uses available data to document/communicate student progress Superior
and develop learning targets.

Q25 Please comment on the students academic progress throughout the period of observation.

Evaluating in kindergarten is challenging but Elizabeth has done an excellent job of integrating assessments into her plans.

4/4