Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
2 b. Women 1 2.85
3 c. Old Aged 0 0
4 d. Mentally Retarded 2 5.71
5 e. Physically Challenged 0 0
6 a&e 1 2.85
7 a,c,d&e 3 8.57
8 a&d 1 2.85
9 a,d&e 2 5.71
10 a&c 2 5.77
11 a,b,c,d&e 1 2.85
12 a,c&e 1 2.85
13 a&b 1 2.85
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
The above table shows that 57% of the Organization was constituted by Children
victims, 2.8% by Women, 5.7% by Mentally retarded, 2.85% by Children and
Physically Challenged, 8.57% by Children, Old Aged, Mentally Retarded and
Physically Challenged, 2.85% by Children and Mentally Retarded, 5.71% by
Children, Mentally Retarded and Physically Challenged, 5.71% by Children and Old
Aged, 2.85% by all the Children, Women, Old Aged, Mentally Retarded and
Physically Challenged, 2.85% by Children, Old Aged and Physically Challenged,
2.85% by Children and Women.
Chart-1
3 Motivational Drive 7 20
5 Others 0 0
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
From the above table, it shows 65.71% of the respondents started the Organization
because of the Sympathy factor, 20% by the Motivational Drive, 11.42 by Society Plight and the
rest 2.87% by the Bitter Personal Experience.
CHART-2
3 National Level 7 20
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
It is identified from the above table that 68.57% of the respondents Organization
functioned at the Local Level, 2.85% at the State Level, 20% at the National Level and 8.58% at
the International Level.
Chart-3
1 Publicity 7 20
2 Funds 23 65.71
3 Volunteers 4 11.42
4 Others 1 2.87
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
It is found from the above table that, 65.7% of the respondents opinioned that their
Organization’s strength was Funds, 20% as Publicity, 11.42% as Volunteers and 2.87% had
some other options.
Chart-4
2 Counseling 15 42.85
3 Seminar 0 0
4 Workshop 1 2.85
5 All 2 5.71
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
It is observed from the above table that, 48.57% of the respondents said that their
Organizations have conducted Events to encourage the Volunteers, 42.85% conduct Counseling,
2.85% conduct Workshops and 5.71% conduct Events, Counseling, Seminar and Workshops.
CHART-5
2 Corporate 14 40
3 Public 17
48.57
4 All above 0 0
5 Others 1 2.85
6 a&b 1 2.85
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
From the above table it is evidenced that, 48.57% of the respondents received Funds
through Public, 40% through Corporate, 2.85% through Government Public and Corporate and
2.85% had other sources.
Chart-6
2 Events 3 8.57
3 Seminar 3 8.57
4 Workshop 2 5.71
5 All 3 8.57
6 a&c 1 2.85
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
From the above table it is known that, 65.79% of the respondents raised funds through
Accepting the Donations, 8.57% through Events, 8.57% through Seminars, 5.71% through
Workshops, 2.85% through Accepting Donations and Seminar and 8.57% through all Accepting
Donations, Events, Seminar and Workshop.
Chart-7
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
From the above table it is interpreted that, 91.50% of the Organization does not receive
Government Funds. 8.50% of the Organizations receive Government Funds.
Chart-8
1 Intermediaries 1
2.87
2 Disability to 2 5.71
Approach the System
3 Delayed/Long Process 14 40
4 Others 18 51.42
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clean that, 40% of the respondents opinioned that
Delayed/Long Process is the difficulty in getting the Government Funds, 5.71% opinioned as
Disability to Approach the System, 2.87% opinioned as Intermediaries are the difficulty in
getting the Government Funds and 51.42% of the respondents had some other reasons or not
interested.
Chart-9
1 Attained 28 80
2 Not Attained 7 20
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
From the above table it is found that, 80% of the respondents feel that the Funds that they
get are enough to run the Organization. 20% of the respondents feel that the Funds that they get
are not enough to run the Organization.
Chart-10
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
From the above table it is concluded that, 65.71% of the respondents are satisfied towards
the Government policies on NGO’s. 34.29% of the respondents are not satisfied towards the
Government policies on NGO’s.
Chart-11
2 5-20 15
42.85
3 Above 20 9 25.73
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
From the above table it is witnessed that, 42.85% of the respondents said that they
conducted 5-20 activities in their Organization per month, 31.42% conducted Less than 5
activities and 25.73% conducted above 20 events.
Chart-12
2 Financial Support 0 0
3 Motivation 2 5.71
4 Education 0 0
5 All Above 31 88.57
6 3&4 1 2.85
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
From the above table it is witnessed that, 5.71% of the respondents said that they have
taken Motivation as the Welfare Measure by the Organization. 2.87% provided Basic Needs,
2.87% provide Motivation and Education, 88.57% taken all the measures such as providing basic
needs, motivation, education and giving financial support.
Chart-13
1 Fund Raising 14 40
2 Non-Cooperation of 1 2.85
Members
3 Improper Event 1 2.85
Formulation
4 Place for 9 25.76
Accommodation
5 All the Above 6 17.14
6 Others 4 11.40
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
From the above table it is found that, 40% of the respondents faced difficulty in Raising
Funds for the Organization. 25.76% had difficulty in providing Place for Accommodation,
2.85% had problem in Non-Cooperation of the Members, 2.85 had problem in Event
Formulation, and 17.14% had problems in Fund Raising, Non-Cooperation of Members,
Improper Event Formulation and Providing Place for Accommodation. Whereas 11.40% of the
respondents had other reasons.
Chart-14
4 Trainees 8 22.85
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
From the above table it is evidenced that, 22.85% of the Graduates in Social worked in
the Organization, 22.85% are Graduates in other Discipline, 22.85% are Trainees, 8.5% are
Teachers and 22.85% are the combination of Graduates in Social Work, Graduates in Other
Discipline, Teachers and Trainees.
Chart-15
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
From the above table it can be said that, 54.28% of the respondents stated that to seek
help from Government is a technique to overcome the problems, 37.14% negotiated with
Corporate, 5.73% conducted District Camps 2.85% approached Educational Institutions.
Chart-16
4 Others 11 31.42
5 a&b 5 14.28
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
From the above table it can be said that, 25.71% of the respondents requested the
Government to give Ration Assistance for their Organization, 22.85% request to give Place of
Accommodation, 14.28% request to give both Ration Assistance and Place of Accommodation
and 31.42% had some other requests.
Chart-17
2 50-100 11 31.44
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
From the above table it can be confirmed that, 42.85% of organizations had victims
within the range below 50, 31.4% had between 50 and 100 and 25.7% had above 100.
Chart-18
2 No 7 20
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
From the above table it can be said that, 80% of the Organizations had enough place of
accommodation for the victims, 20% had no enough place for accommodation.
Chart-19
Table-20 Showing the Adequacy of Food in the Organization for the Victims
2 No 2 5.71
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
From the above table it can be said that, 94.29% of the respondents stated that the food
for victims was adequate and 5.71% had no adequate food.
Chart-20
Chart-20 Showing the Adequacy of Food in the Organization for the Victims
TABLE-21
2 Donations 6 17.14
3 Sponsors 6 17.14
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
From the above table it can be declared that, 65.72% of organizations managed food for
the victims through Self Funds, 17.14% through Donations and 17.14% through sponsors.
Chart-21
Table-22 Showing the Adequacy of Clothing in the Organization for the Victims
2 No 2 5.71
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
From the above table it can be said that, 94.29% of the victims in organization had
adequate clothing and 5.71% had no adequate clothing.
Chart-22
Chart-22 Showing the Adequacy of Clothing in the Organization for the Victims
TABLE-23
2 Donations 9 25.72
3 Sponsors 7 20
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
From the above table it can be declared that, 54.2% of the respondents managed Clothing
for the victims in their Organization through their Self Funds, 25.72% through Donations and
20% through Sponsors.
Chart-23
Table-24 Showing the Expenses Incurred for the Organization per Month
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
From the above table it can be declared that, 57.14% of the respondents spent between
Rs.20,000 and Rs.50,000 per Month to run the Organization, 17.14% spent between Rs.50,000
and Rs.1,00,000 per Month, 17.14% spent above Rs.1,00,000 per Month and 8.58% spent below
Rs.20,000 per Month.
Chart-24
Chart-24 Showing the Expenses Incurred for the Organization per Month
TABLE-25
Total 35 100
Interpretation:
From the above table it can be said that, 88.58% of the respondents managed their
expenses of their Organization within the prescribed Budget, 11.42% did not manage their
expenses within the prescribed Budget.
Chart-25
Interpretation:
From the above table it can be said that, 68.59% of the respondents say that Creating
Awareness among the Public is the Best suggested solution to overcome the various problems
that the Organizations’ face, 17.14% insist in increasing the Marketing Aspects (like Brouchers
and Websites), 11.42% of the respondents feel to Approach Government for Help and 2.85%
suggest Increasing the Memberships.