Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CALIFORNIA
planning and resource allocation decisions, Another contributing factor that compli-
leading to greater uncertainty when com- cates strategic planning and forecasting is
pared to other, more developed, industries. the lack of proper business infrastructure,
As the forecast period lengthens in cannabis, particularly the inability to access financial
the ability to accurately predict performance services. Due to the federal prohibition
decreases dramatically. This inability to on cannabis, banks are hesitant and often
predict performance causes investors and unwilling to work with cannabis businesses.
industry operators to take uncomfortable This creates major issues for operators and
risks, and the risk of underperformance can lead to lost margin and revenue. These
(or growth based on a weak foundation) factors necessitate more sophisticated data
decreases investor confidence and threatens and analytics to stay ahead in the industry.
the growth of the industry.
THE DEARTH OF DATA DRIVES
There are several factors that contribute RELIANCE ON INTUITION
to the uncertainty in the cannabis industry. AND ASSUMPTIONS
The three major markets for cannabis —
medical, adult use, and ancillary — often The cannabis industry’s complex nature calls
overlap, making the market more difficult for highly sophisticated data, the lack of
to navigate, and combined with the rapid which has proven to be one of the major
80%
OF HIGH IMPORTANCE
70%
CONSIDER THIS DATA
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
CONSIDER THIS DATA
HIGH QUALITY
The NFD Business Environment Score N OTE : The market prioritization output
is a composite score based upon several hinges on the New Frontier Data Business
key indicators, and these metrics are Environment Score. This proprietary new
used as inputs to a proprietary model to metric allows our analysts and clients to
determine the overall favorability of the determine how favorable a given region will
cannabis business environment for a stan- be to the cannabis industry. The evaluation of
dard operator in each state. The market the business environment relies on qualitative
growth score is determined by comparing assessments supported by quantitative data.
the CAGR of a particular market with By quantifying regulatory burden and using
the nationwide average growth rate for it as an input into the algorithm along with
cannabis markets. economic and census data, the Business Envi-
ronment Score can be used as an objective
tool to make more effective decision-making.
GR OWT H IN T HE C ON T E X T OF BU SI N ESSES E N VI R ON M E N T
Oregon Nevada
lo
Co
Alaska Maine
BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
Michigan California
Massachusetts
Illinois
Montana
Washington
New York
New Jersey Minnesota
FALLING BEHIND CHALLENGING GROWTH
GROWTH
$8
2018-2025 CAGR
$7 12% $6.46 $6.54 $6.59
$6.30 $6.37
$6 $5.62
$5 $4.65
BILLIONS
$4 $3.79
$3 $2.69 $2.76
$2
$1
$0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Adult Use Medical
50%
40.9%
40%
34.5% 34.9% 34.7% 35.1% 34.3%
32.1%
30.1%
30% 28.6% 27.4%
20%
10%
0%
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
is poised to house both the largest regulated adult use market, annual sales are projected
medical and adult use cannabis markets in to grow at a compound annual rate (CAGR)
the country. MCRSA and AUMA were of 12% over the following eight years to
each set to be implemented by January reach an estimated $6.6 billion by 2025.
2018, but the industry is facing opposition
from individual municipalities and a flourish- Medical cannabis sales in California are
ing black market. Many program details are projected to account for 35% of all legal
still undecided, and adult use sales will likely cannabis sales in the country in 2017.
not begin until mid-2018 at the earliest as Despite activating adult use sales in 2018,
lawmakers and regulators work together to the state’s share will decrease slightly over
implement a statewide plan. time as many other newly legal states begin
to roll out medical and adult use programs.
Legal cannabis sales in California are pro- Still, with a population of more than 39
jected to reach $2.8 billion in 2017 and, million, and with geographic regions in the
supported by the activation of a regulated northern part of the state that present
climatic conditions ideal for cultivation, become the nation’s first to fully legalize
California will remain the most dominant medical cannabis through Prop. 215 (the
player in the country’s cannabis industry. Compassionate Use Act) in 1996. The
By 2025, the state is projected to account original law allowed doctors to recom-
for more than a quarter (27.4%) of all legal mend cannabis for serious conditions, and
cannabis sales in the country. patients were permitted to use, possess,
and grow cannabis themselves or designate
MEDICAL MARKET caregivers to assist them, though a regu-
latory framework was not developed until
Qualifying Conditions much later. Absent any unified regulatory
oversight, widely varied market practices
^^ Anorexia
emerged across the state, and patients
^^ Any Debilitating Illness Deemed and businesses alike faced frequent raids
Appropriate by a Physician
by federal and state authorities.
^^ Arthritis
^^ Cachexia/Wasting syndrome
On September 11, 2015, the California Leg-
^^ Cancer
islature passed a series of bills that together
^^ Chronic Pain would establish California’s first statewide
^^ Epilepsy licensing system for medical cannabis
^^ Glaucoma businesses. In October 2015, Governor
^^ HIV or AIDS Jerry Brown signed the Medical Cannabis
^^ Intractable Spasticity Regulation and Safety Act (MCRSA) into
^^ Migraine law. Primary authority was given to the
^^ Multiple Sclerosis Department of Consumer Affairs, where a
^^ Nausea new bureau (the Bureau of Medical Mari-
^^ Persistent Muscle Spasms juana Regulation [BMMR]) will oversee the
^^ Seizures program and share the licensing authority
for various types of businesses with the
California has America’s longest history state’s departments of Public Health, and
of medical cannabis sales - the first (albeit Food and Agriculture, respectively.
unregulated) dispensary in the United
States opened in the San Francisco Bay One of the key issues making it difficult for
area in 1992, and operation of the San the state to closely monitor the program over
Francisco Cannabis Buyers Club helped the years has been the lack of centralized
set the stage for the Golden State to data and reporting, in part due to voluntary
T YPE 8 Testing
T YPE 11 Distribution
T YPE 12 Transporter
The most notable changes to the state’s NOTE: Local business licenses might ulti-
medical program under MCRSA include: mately have different requirements than the
statewide medical and adult use permits, which
ĵ New License Classes
will create additional regulatory complexity
ĵ Ability for Businesses to Operate and compliance risks for businesses going
Under a For-Profit Status through the permitting process.
ĵ New Requirements for
Testing and Labeling ADULT USE MARKET
ADULT USE
DESCRIPTION
LICENSE TYPE
Cultivation: Specialty outdoor. Up to 5,000 square feet of
T YPE 1 canopy, or up to 50 noncontiguous plants. (Small)
T YPE 5B Cultivation: Mixed – light, Greater than 22,000 square feet. (Large)
T YPE 8 Testing
T YPE 11 Distributor
T YPE 12 Microbusiness
and another on retail sales. The state has TRENDS & ANALYSIS
announced that it will begin accepting
applications for adult use cannabis licenses Global Impacts of Adult Use Legalization
in January 2018, although sales will not Were California an independent country, it
legally begin or be taxed until mid-2018 at would represent the world’s eighth-largest
the very earliest. economy. In addition to revenue genera-
tion, adult use legalization in California will
The regulations under AUMA will closely help reshape the national and global debate
mirror those of MCRSA , with both about cannabis law reform. The state’s acti-
subject to change as implementation gets vation of legal adult use sales is projected
underway. Building off the licenses defined to inject over $1 billion into the market in
under MCRSA, the adult use law would the first year of operation, making cannabis
create three new cultivation licenses for an important engine of growth in the U.S.
“large” cultivators, though in an effort to economy. Meanwhile, California should
allow smaller producers time to establish provide rich case studies surrounding the
their operations, those large cultivator economic impact of the industry at large.
licenses will not be issued until 2023, five Beyond the jobs created and taxes paid by
years after the program’s implementation. businesses that grow and touch the plant,
the ancillary products and services that
Adult use retail sales will be taxed at 15%, serve the industry, from agricultural supplies
higher than Colorado’s 10% rate, yet sig- to real estate and technology, will highlight
nificantly lower than the 37% tax levied in the extent to which adult use legalization
Washington. Additionally, cultivators will be can be a catalyst for new economic growth
charged a flat rate of $9.25 per ounce of in innovative ways.
flower produced, and $2.75 per ounce of
trim produced. Cannabis Research
California is also set to become a leading
Despite some operational challenges incubator for cannabis research: Under
in the forms of local opposition, a deeply AUMA, 10% of cannabis sales tax receipts
entrenched illicit market, and a regulatory will be spent on drug abuse research, and
structure still in development, there remain an additional 10% will focus on cannabis
sizable opportunities for entrepreneurs in research. With the industry projected
the state – both for operators that touch the to raise as much as $1 billion annually in
plant (such as cultivators, retailers and man- tax revenues for the state by 2025, the
ufacturers), as well as for ancillary businesses. funding resources for the state’s drug
abuse and cannabis research initiatives will failed to gather more than 36% approval.
dramatically outpace those of any other Among other provisions, Prop M repealed
state in the country, establishing California a previous ordinance that would have
as a global center for cannabis science and capped the number of dispensaries oper-
policy research. ating within the city limits to just 135 (in
a city with a population of 4 million). A
Out-of-State Diversion new city licensing system is vital for Los
Given its number of cultivators, a history of Angeles cannabis companies to comply
loose regulation, and a strong home-culti- with upcoming state regulations, which,
vation market, California is a prime source as of January 2018, will require a local
for significant diversion of excess canna- permit as a precursor for obtaining any
bis through the illicit market into other state business license.
states, causing tension within the market,
especially as it regards federal law enforce- NOTE: Prop M also sets a September 30
ment and state industry stakeholders. The deadline for L.A.’s city council to pass a new
implementation of stronger regulations, regulatory structure for the industry, autho-
including testing requirements and a seed- rizes new and steeper fines for unlicensed
to-sale system, will likely help stem illicit cannabis businesses, and establishes sales tax
market trafficking; nevertheless, efforts rates for different types of cannabis-related
toward preventing out-of-state diversion business licenses.
will continue be a major practical concern
as a large percentage of California’s aspir-
ing cultivators are not expected to make
the transition into the formally regulated
legal market due to compliance costs and
regulatory hurdles.