Project Title: __________________________________________

Date: ____________________________________________

Marginally Very
Evaluation Poor Acceptable Acceptable Good Excellent Not
Applicable

1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9 - 10

1. Problem Definition: Stated the problem clearly,

provided motivation for undertaking the project.

2. Specific Aims: Provided clear, logical description

of the objectives and plan of action.

3. Background - Literature: Demonstrated sound

knowledge of literature in the area, and of prior
work on the specific problem.

4. Significance - impact of the project: a

Demonstrated the potential value of solution or
contribution to the research problem in advancing
knowledge (a) within and (b) outside of the area of
the study. b

5. Solution Approach: Applied sound state-of-the-

field research methods/tools to solve the defined
problem and has described the methods/tools
effectively.

6. Results: Analyzed and interpreted project data

effectively.

7. Quality of Written and Oral Communication: a

Communicated project results and implications
clearly and professionally in both (a) written and
(b) oral form. b

8. Critical Thinking: Demonstrated capability for

independent project in the area of the study,
significance expertise in the area, and ability to
make original contributions to the field.

9. Broader Impact: Demonstrated awareness of

broader implications of the concluded project.
10. Documentation and Presentations: Ensure that
the data in the documentation is the same in the
oral presentation.

TOTAL:

COMMENT BOX:

Panelist