Jawaharlal Nehru

National Urban Renewal Mission

Hyderabad
City Development Plan

1
 Urbanisation

 Urban areas contribute 75% of GDP and more than

50% of our population to live in urban areas in few
decades.
 Role of National and State policies in targeting
‘balanced development’- but limitations to the
success of such efforts.
 Focused approach coupled with heavy investment in
urban infrastructure needed.
 Cities would be the key drivers to our economy but…
Urban areas do not have 100000 problems but 100 problems multiplied 1000 times

2
Presentation Covers…
1. City Development Plan (CDP)
2. Salient features of CDP : Hyderabad
• Current scenario and gaps
• Underpinning Challenges
• Vision
• Strategy
• Financing
• Action Plan

3
4
 Hyderabad in National Scenario- Comparison with Benchmark Cities

Hyderabad lags benchmark Indian cities on economic, infrastructure and social indicators….
Hyderabad Bangalore Mumbai Delhi Chennai Kolkata
Gross District Product Per
Low GDP-
Capita Rs. 23000 Rs. 33000 Rs. 43000 Rs. 39000 Rs. 34,000Rs. 33,000
Population below poverty •Potential for
Economic line ( 2001) 23% 33% NA 8% 20% 6% increasing GDP.
Economic Disparity ( % of
low and lower middle • Low literacy
Income households, 2002) 37% 42% 27% 18% 42% 32% level.
Literacy Rate( 2001) 79% 87% 87% 83% 80% 81%
Education •Trailing in Water
Drop out rate ( 2001) 66% 70% 42% 52% 46% 42%
supply, Sanitation,
% of population living in
Housing slums ( 2001) 37% 18% 55% 35% 40% 31%
transportation etc.
Health Child Mortality Rate (2001) 6.90% 4.90% NA 2.60% 3.70% 1.60%
Piped water supply per day 2 hrs
( Hours) alternate day 2 to 4 NA 2 1 NA
Per capita Availability in
Water
lpcd of potable water (
130 80-100 168 180 106 173
Water utility coverage area,
2003)
Sewerage Connections (UA)
Sanitation 41% 21% NA 55% 55% NA
Public Transport Utilization
rate 44% 36% NA 62% 36% NA
% area covered by roads 6% 12% 10% 18% 10% 12%
Vehicles Density (
Transport passenger car units per KM
of road length) 723 695 242 NA 293 NA
Road Accident Fatality Rate 1200 1160 730 1430 100 350

( per 100,000 pop.) 2001

Strong Weak

5
Hyderabad in Inter-National Scenario- Comparison with Benchmark Cities

The comparison is even more harsh with respect to other metropolitan cities in developing
countries………….

Hyderabad Hanoi Bangkok Jakarta Johannesburg

•Low GDP-
Per capita income
Potential for
(USD) 511 3,510 15,053 7,2,69 2,900
increase in GDP.
Economic Population below
Outcomes poverty line ( 2001) 23% 1.80% NA NA 25% • Low literacy level.
Unemployment Rate
•High poverty level.
(%) (1998) 22% 10.30% 2.20% 16.80% 26.40%
Education Literacy Rate( 2001) 79% 92% 97% 98% 93% •High child mortality
Health Child Mortality Rate 6.90% 4.20% 3.30% 2.40% 5.50% rate.
Household access to •Trailing in Water
water 81% 100% NA 91% 84.50% supply, Sanitation,
Per capita Availability transportation etc.
in lpcd of potable
Water
water ( Water utility
coverage area, 2003)
130 NA NA 77 261
Household water
connections ( 2001) 64% 70% 99% 50.30% 50%
Sewerage Strong Weak
Sanitation Connections (UA) 41% 50% 100% 64.80% 84%

Source: Monitor Group Report 6

Demographics

Population Density
Area
Component (lakhs) (p/sq.km)
(sq km)
1981 1991 2001 2001
MCH 172 21.0 30.5 36.3 21048

Surrounding 419 3.8 9.9 17 4102

municipalities
Others 187 2.3 3.2 4 2147

HUA 778 27.1 43.6 57.5 7393

HUDA 1905 29.9 46.7 63.8 3351

7
 Demographics
Hyderabad Population has grown rapidly and is amongst the most densely populated cities

Decadal Population Growth Population Density of Major Corporations

in Major Urban Agglomeration (1991-2001) (2001) „000

UA
51.9%
Delhi Mumbai 27
36.2% Municipal
Corporation

41.5%
Bglore. Delhi 24
30.3%

31.8%
Hyd. Hyderabad 21
19.3%

29.5%
Mumbai Blore 19
20.0%

19.9%
Kolk. Kolkata 16
4.1%

18.5%
Chen. Chennai 11
9.8%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0 10 20 30 40

% People (in ‘000) per Sq. KM

Source: Census of India (1991 and 2001)

8
Demographics
Most of the growth has taken place away from the city core
Decadal Population Growth Rates in Decadal Growth of Population
Various Constituents of HUDA (1981-01) in Various Constituents (1991-2001)
200% Uppalk. M 103%
1981-1991
1991-2001 Rajen. Ngr M 88%
158% Qutbul. M 81%
160%
Malkaj. M 80%

L.B.Ngr M 72%
120%
Alwal M 65%

% Kapra M 63%
80% 72% Seriling. M 63%
All
Kukat. M 56% Municipalities
42% have grown by
40% Gaddin. M 52% more than
26% 50%
19% 19% Sec. Cntt 21% compared to
~20% for MCH
MCH 19%
and Sec.Cantt
0%
Ramach.-CT 13%
s
H

t
an
ie

Os. Univ 10%

C

lit
M

C
pa

a d
i
ic

cb

0% 50% 100% 150% 200%

un

Se
M

%
10

Note: CT refers to Census Town, M refers to Municipality

Source: Census of India (1991 and 2001)
9
Demographics

Nature of growth Growth Drivers

Infrastructure
Cheaper Real

Employment
Proximity to
Commercial
Residential
Industrial

Estate
Uppalk. M 1 1 1
Rajen. Ngr M 1 1
Qutbul. M
Increasing Growth Rate

1 1 1
Malkaj. M 1 1 1
Proximity to MCH is
L.B.Ngr M the key reason for 1 1
Alwal M growth – Implying 1 1
large % of traffic
Kapra M 1 1
flows are towards
Seriling. M MCH 1 1
Kukat. M 1 1
Gaddin. M 1 1
MCH 1 1 1 1
Ramach.-CT 1 1

Growth has been residential creating

demand for service delivery infrastructure in
10 Municipalities
10
Population Density

4156
3706

13691

6753
3273

1218

25293
21046

6976

4142
3129

Pressure on Core is high

Units- Persons/Sq. Km 11
Demographics (Projections)

Component Area (sq 2001 2011 2021

km) Population Density Population Density Population Density
(in lakhs) (p/sq.km) (in lakhs) (p/sq.km) (in lakhs) (p/sq.km)

MCH 172 36.3 21048 43.3 25116 51.7 29977

Surrounding 419 17 4102 28.9 6926 50.9 12151

municipalities
Others 187 4 2147 5 2692 6.3 3391

HUA 778 57.5 7393 77.2 9923 108.9 13997

HUDA 1905 63.8 3351 90.5 4753 136.4 7162

Growth will be concentrated in HUA area

12
13
 Economics
Gross District Product Per Capita (2000-01)

Mumbai 43 Hyderabad does not

compare favorably with
other metros, in terms of
Delhi 39
average gross district
product per capita or
proportion of low income
Kolkata 33
households

1
Bangalore 33

Hyderabad 23

0 20 40 60

Rs. „000

Source: NCAER India Market Demographic Report 2002, State directorates of economics and statistics
15
Growth Corridors
Areas of Economic Growth
•Growth areas
•Industrial and IT
Apparel Estates
Park •National highway
•State highway
•Rail Network

Bio-tech
Park

HUA

Hi-tech
city

FAB City
Shamshabad
Airport Hardware
Park
16
Economics

 Knowledge and service sector

– IT, Bio-tech, FAB city
 Manufacturing
– Apparel park
– Garments and leather
 Tourism
 International Airport

17
 Spatial Growth To
Manmad
To Nagpur
N.h.-7 LEGEND
To
DEVELOPMENT AREA
Narsapur
ROADS PROPOSED IN 1980
MASTER PLAN
ROADS PROPOSED IN 1980
MASTER PLAN
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS
MEDCHAL
BROAD GAUGE RAILWAY LINE

METER GAUGE RAILWAY LINE

WATER BODIES

Past trend (Before 1991‟s)

WATER TANK
GUNLA POCHAMPALLY

Future trend (2001-2020)

To Mumbai SURARAM RAILWAY STATIONS
N.h.no -9 AIRPORT

Slow densification of
PATANCHERU
GROWTH BY 2001

 RAMCHANDRAPURAM
KUKATPALLY, APHB
QUTBULLAPUR

SECUNDRABAD KUSHAIGUDA
To Kazipet 
GROWTH BY 2011
GROWTH BY 2021
Saturation of MCH
loosely built up areas HUA to experience
GHATKESAR
To Mumbai

GUNLA
(Broad Guage)
CYBERABAD

along major transport higher growth due to

HUSSAIN
SAGAR
HABSHIGUDA
HYDERABAD

corridors in the past. OSMAN

KHARMANGHAT
L.B.NAGAR
new initiatives
SAGAR UPPARPALLY

HIMAY AT FALAKNUMA PALACE

To Vijaywada
SAGAR N.h.no -9
To
Vikharabad
HUDA : ENVISAGED SPATIAL
GRO WTH BY 2021- To
SHAMSABAD ALTERNATIVE 1 ( CO NCENTRIC Manmad
MO DEL) To Nagpur
N.h.-7
CYBERABAD
To ENCLAVE
DEVELOPMENT
Narsapur PLAN
To Nagarjuna Sagar
To Bangalore
N.h.no-7
SCALE 1:250000 VASTU SHILPA CO NSULTANTS
"SANGATH" THALTEJ ROAD AHMEDABAD-380054
1 0 1 3 5 10KM PHONE 7454537-39 FAX 079-7452006 MEDCHAL

GUNLA POCHAMPALLY
To Mumbai SURARAM
N.h.no -9
PATANCHERU

QUTBULLAPUR
RAMCHANDRAPURAM To Kazipet
KUKATPALLY, APHB
KUSHAIGUDA
SECUNDRABAD
GHATKESAR
To Mumbai GUNLA
(Broad Guage)

Present trend (1991-2001‟s) CYBERABAD

HUSSAIN
SAGAR
HABSHIGUDA

 Rapid densification of HYDERABAD

KHARMANGHAT

areas around Industrial

OSMAN L.B.NAGAR
SAGAR UPPARPALLY NOD

To Vijaywada

Sites.
HIMAY AT FALAKNUMA PALACE
SAGAR N.h.no -9
To
Vikharabad

SHAMSABAD

To Nagarjuna Sagar
To Bangalore
N.h.no-7
SCALE 1:250000

1 0 1 3 5 10KM

18
Future Trend (2001-2020)
To
Manmad
To Nagpur
N.h.-7 LEGEND
To
DEVELOPMENT AREA
Narsapur
ROADS PROPOSED IN 1980
MASTER PLAN
ROADS PROPOSED IN 1980
MASTER PLAN

Outer Ring
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS
MEDCHAL
BROAD GAUGE RAILWAY LINE

Road METER GAUGE RAILWAY LIN

WATER BODIES

WATER TANK
GUNLA POCHAMPALLY
To Mumbai SURARAM RAILWAY STATIONS
N.h.no -9 AIRPORT
PATANCHERU
GROWTH BY 2001
QUTBULLAPUR
To Kazipet GROWTH BY 2011
RAMCHANDRAPURAM
KUKATPALLY, APHB
SECUNDRABAD KUSHAIGUDA GROWTH BY 2021
GHATKESAR
To Mumbai GUNLA
(Broad Guage) UPTO 75 LAC
CYBERABAD UPTO 25 LAC
HUSSAIN
SAGAR UPTO 10 LAC
HABSHIGUDA UPTO 5 LAC
HYDERABAD

KHARMANGHAT
OSMAN L.B.NAGAR
SAGAR UPPARPALLY NODES

HIMAY AT FALAKNUMA PALACE

To Vijaywada
SAGAR N.h.no -9
To
Vikharabad
HUDA : ENVISAGED SPATIAL
GRO WTH BY 2021-
SHAMSABAD ALTERNATIVE 1 ( CO NCENTRIC
MO DEL)

CYBERABAD ENCLAVE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
To Nagarjuna Sagar
To Bangalore
N.h.no-7
SCALE 1:250000 VASTU SHILPA CO NSULTANTS
"SANGATH" THALTEJ ROAD AHMEDABAD-380054
1 0 1 3 5 10KM PHONE 7454537-39 FAX 079-7452006

19
Spatial

 Need for a coordinated strategy to disperse

economic activities in a sustainable manner
 Spatial plan needs integration with
infrastructure and services
 Housing stock for the poor
 Controlled development in the surrounding
ULBs

20
Service Levels

 Water
 Sewerage
 Solid waste
 Transportation
 Drainage
 Urban poverty

21
Water Sector - Status

Surrounding
Components MCH Area Municipalities

Network coverage 90% 65%

Access to piped supply 70% 43%

Per Capita supply 162 / LPCD 91 / LPCD

O&M Cost recovery 66% (without NA

debt servicing)
Non Revenue Water 40% (est) 60% (est)

22
 Water supply coverage

Network Coverage (%)

Serilingampally 30

Rajendernagar 45

Qutbullapur 50

Malkajgiri 65

Kukatpally 70

Uppal 82.5

L B Nagar 85

Kapra 85

Alwal 90

MCH 90

0 20 40 60 80 100

Source : HMWS&SB
23
 Demand- Supply Situation
Per Capita Comsumption (lpcd)
Supply Vs Demand
(mgd- 2001)
Malkajgiri 40

4.31
Rajendranagar Kapra 44
1.76

12.5 Alwal 54
Serilingampally
4.50
Rajendernagar 57
12.57
L B Nagar
10.00 Uppal 73

5.05 Serilingampally 104

Uppal
2.50

Kukatpally 125
14.68
Kukatpally
7.20
L B Nagar 141

4.9
Kapra MCH 162
3.00

-1.00 1.00 3.00 5.00 7.00 9.00 11.00 13.00 15.00 Qutbullapur 177

supply demand
0 50 100 150 200

Source : HMWS&SB
24
Frequency of Water Supply
Once in 5 days Malkajgiri

Once in 3 days Uppal kalan

MCH

Gaddianaram
L B Nagar
Once in 2 days

Rajendranagar, Serilingampally
Kukatpally, Quthbullahpur

Kapra

0 0.5 1 1.5 2

Hours of Supply

25
Current Situation – Sewerage Sector

Surrounding
Components MCH Area
Municipalities

Network Coverage 62% 20%

Access NA NA
Total Waste Water generated 350 mld NA

Capacity of Treatment Plant 133 mld NA

Waste Water Treated 38% NA
Recycling and Reuse 3% NA

26
Solid Waste Management

Components MCH Surrounding

(%) municipalities (%)
Collection efficiency 100 95

Segregation NA NA

Door to Door 65 79

Vehicle Capacity 76 42

Processing of Waste 19 (capacity) NA

Disposal - SLF No engineered landfill site

27
 Traffic & Transportation - Reality
Vehicular Growth
1000000
800000
Number of Vehicles

600000
400000
200000
0
1981 1991 2001
2 wheeler 60669 279430 856397
3 wheeler 6926 18558 58851
4 wheeler 10227 48537 126472
APSRTC 621 1664 2312

28
 Modal Share
Benchmark
Tempo Cycles
Auto 2% 3% Private
20%
11% Bus
44%

TW
29%
Public
Cars 80%
11%

Year 2001

29
Traffic & Transportation - Reality
The reducing vehicular speed is resulting in high pollution
levels in the city
Average Speed (km/hour)
18

16

14

12
Average Speed

10
average speed (km/hour)
8

0
1981
1 1991
2 2001
3 2006
4
Year

Year 1981 1991 2001 2006

Average speed (Km/hr.) 17 16 14 12

30
Drainage

Components MCH Surrounding

Municipalities
Roads covered with 27 16
Storm Water Drains
(%)

31
Poverty

0.0
0.3 7
8

0.1 0.1
6 4
0.0 0.0
2 4

1200 16

14.11 14
1000
0.0
2 12
800
10

600 1142 8
0.0
3
6
400 5.4
0.2
4
200
471
2

0 0
MCH Surrounding
Municipalities

Legend: No. of Slums

Slum Population (Lakhs)
BPL population
Slum Population
Number of Slums 32
Institutional Challenges

33
 Institutional Fragmentation
Coordination required across multiple entities for most service delivery areas

Sewerage Irrigation,

Telecom and Other

Development and

Pollution Control
Urban Planning,
Tax Collections

Law and Order

and Drainage

Water supply,

Fire Services
Transport

Road Infra

Electricity

Utilities
Control
Government Body Area under purview

Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad (MCH) Municipal Limits 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 3

Hyderabad Metro Water Supply and Sewerage

Board Entire Metropolitan Area 3 1

Hyderabad Urban Development Authority Urban Development Area 1 2 3

Andhra Pradesh Transco Entire Metropolitan Area 3

AP Central Power Distribution Co. Central Districts of AP inc. Hyd 1

Postal and Telegraphs department Entire State 3

Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Entire State 3

Road and Buildings Department Entire State 2

AP Pollution Control Board Entire State 3

Indian Railways Entire State

10 Municipalities Municipal Limits 3 1 1 3 1 3 1 3

Secundarabad Cantonment Municipal Limits 3 1 1 3 1 3 1 3

Coordination
Key Agency in Respective Jurisdiction
Overlap
Source: In-city Discussions
34
 Functional Overlaps and Coordination Requirements
Road infrastructure development could suffer due to lack of coordination between agencies. Maintenance involves still more agencies

Construction of Roads Maintenance of Roads

Agency

City Roads Flyover Connecting Roads Highways Regular Maintenance Road Cutting

Responsible for road and side walk construction Road maintenance of Responsible for road cutting
city roads, flyovers and permissions but lacks
connecting roads enforcement powers for quality
MCH
and time for restoration

Takes on Construction of Road maintenance of

flyovers on specific projects some flyovers
such as Mega city. Also
constructs roads in area where it
HUDA develops and sells residential
plots

Takes on Construction of connecting Responsible for road Responsible for road cutting
roads, highways maintenance connecting permissions for highways
roads and highways
R&B

HMWSSB APCPDCL, HMWSSB and

telecom players often need to dig
APCPDC up roads for maintenance of their
No role own infrastructure

Telecom operators

Source: In-city Discussions

35
Potential Roadblocks- Structural Challenges – Hyderabad Example

Industry dept/
HOME
APIIC

36
Sectoral Challenges

37
Water Supply

 Limited network coverage and access to surrounding

ULBs

 Unaccounted for Water – 40%

– Loss of 240 crores of money every year on water

 O & M Cost Recovery – 66% (without debt servicing)

 Source security (declining flows to Himayatsagar and

Osmansagar)

38
Sewerage

• Coverage especially in surrounding ULBs

• Treatment & Disposal – 20%

• O&M

39
Solid Waste Management

 Segregation - Negligible
 Treatment - 5%
 Disposal - Negligible

40
Drainage

 Limited coverage
 Lack of Integrated drainage plan
 Capacity
 Encroachments

 Resulting in flooding and inundation

41
 Traffic & Transportation

 Multiple agencies and fragmentation of responsibilities

– No institution is solely responsible for transport management
 Declining share of public transport
 Lack of modern traffic management system
 Inadequate infrastructure

42
Poverty

 Tenure issues
 Inadequate access to housing and services
 Notification/denotification process
 Lack of convergence

43
CITY VISION
 Hyderabad‟s vision is to be an inclusive and futuristic city
providing high quality services with universal access. It will
be a slum free, citizen friendly, well-governed and
environmental friendly city.

To see Hyderabad as…

– Futuristic city
– High quality services with universal access
– Inclusive
– slum free
– citizen friendly
– well governed
– Environment friendly

44
Traffic and Transportation Sector
Safe, reliable, eco friendly and speedy transport system with improved share and
accessibility to the cost effective public transport system.
Traffic and Transportation Sector - Strategic Action Plan (2005-2012)

Year Year Year Year Year Year

Component Institution Activity Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√
State
√ √ √ √ √ √
Government Constitution and Operationalisation of Hyderabad
Transport Management Authority (HMTA)

√
ULB Comprehensive Traffic & Transportation Study for √
entire HMA*

State √
Ring fencing APSRTC, Railways for Hyderabad √ √ √ √ √
Government region

√
ULB Transport Assets and utilities mapping using G.I.S. √ √ √ √
Technology

ULB, Police
Traffic and Transportation Management using √ √
Planning, Reforms and dept.
G.I.S. and G.P.S. technology
Institutional Strengthening
ULB, Police √
Design and Implementation of IEC campaign for √ √ √ √ √
dept. improved traffic awareness

√
Capacity building initiatives for better traffic √ √ √ √ √
management

√
Introduce congestion pricing for private sector √ √ √ √ √
during peak hours
ULB
Differential parking fee √ √ √ √ √ √

Auto restricted zones/ pedestrianisation √ √ √ √ √ √

√
√ √ √ √ √
Surcharge for other state/ city vehicles imposed

45
Traffic and Transportation Sector Strategy – Contd:-

APSRTC Increasing the bus fleet √ √ √

Provision of bus bays in identified locations

√ √
including signage (347 nos.)

Survey, Land acquisition and provision of bus

bays in remaining feasible locations (assuming √ √ √ √ √ √ √
ULB, 500 bus bays over 7 years)
APSRTC
Signage improvement at bus bays to streamline 25
75% 90% 95% 95% 95%
bus and passenger mobility %

Development of bus terminals at CBDs and

√ √ √ √ √ √
growth centres

Dedicated line for bus carriage way (arterial and sub arterial roads)
Better Service Delivery Survey, Land acquisition and provision of bus
through improved bays in remaining feasible locations (assuming √ √
share of Public 500 bus bays over 7 years)
Transport (Bus, MMTS
& MRTS) Development of required infrastructure
10 10
(signage, signal system, separators, etc.)

Formulation and Operationalisation of the

dedicated lines (% completed of the total 25% 50% 75% 100%
corridor planned)

Service Coverage of MMTS (in km) 48 96 127 150

Completion of MMTS II phase √ √ √ √ √

Railways
Improved frequency of MMTS particularly
during peak hours

Railways & Common ticketing for MMTS and bus transport

√ √ √ √ √ √ √
APSRTC and improved feeder bus services

ULB Provision of MRTS (length in km) 60

46
Traffic and Transportation Sector Strategy – Contd:-

Strengthening existing roads by hot mix/ asphalt/ CC roads

√ √ √ √ √ √
- 2600 km

Up gradation of important roads √ √ √ √ √ √

Junction Improvements - 142 locations √ √ √

Signals - 71 locations √ √ √

Flyovers - 39 nos. √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Signage and markings √

Improved Safety, Service Street Lighting - 4,60,200 no.s √ √ √ √ √ √

delivery and Customer
HUDA & ULB Parking Lots/ complexes - 20no.s √ √ √
Satisfaction by providing
better infrastructure Radial Roads - 230 km √ √ √ √ √

Upgradation of major link roads √ √ √

√ √ √
Parallel Roads, slip roads, new links - 42km

Outer Ring Road-152 km √ √ √ √

√ √
Truck, Private Bus, Para Transit, Parking Lots- 50n0s

Truck Terminals - 5 nos. √ √ √ √

ROBs & RUBs-15 nos. √ √ √

Subways/ FoBs - 36 no.s √ √ √

Improved Pedestrian
ULB
Facilities, comfort and safety √ √ √
Pedestrian crossings

√
Constitution of Urban Transport Development Fund
ULB, state
Finance
government Loans/Bonds √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Annuity Based arrangements √ √ √ √ √ √

47
Water Supply
VISION
Our vision is to delight customer by providing pressurized continuous quality water in an equitable,
efficient, sustainable manner and create Hyderabad a world-class city.

Water Supply Sector - Strategy to achieve Vision and Goal (2005-2012)

Component Activity Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7

Comprehensive Water Sector Development Master Plan √ √ √

• Lowering the connection costs √ √

Lessening the documentation process √ √

Leak Detection Studies √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Energy Audit Studies √ √ √

Water Quality Studies and Monitoring √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Design and Implementation of Communication Strategy √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Baseline Survey √

Human Resources Development √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Planning, Reforms and Establishment of Regulatory Authority √ √ √ √ √ √
Institutional
Strengthening GIS Mapping of Water and Sewerage Utility Mapping √ √ √ √ √

Community Initiatives Support √ √ √ √

Modernising Financial Management and MIS √ √ √ √

E-Governance √ √ √ √ √ √

Introduction of civic representatives in the board √ √

Private Sector Participation √ √ √ √ √ √

Ring fencing the accounts / finances √ √

Tariff transition plan to recover the O&M costs √ √ √ √ √ √

Improved bill collection efficiency √ √ √ √ √ √ √

48
Water Supply Strategy –Cont:
Water Supply Sector - Strategy to achieve Vision and Goal (2005-2012)

Component Activity Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7

i) Krishna Drinking Water Supply Project Ph-II √ √ - - - - -

Source Augmentation
ii) Godavari Phase-I / Krishna Drinking Water Supply Project Ph-III - - √ √ √ √ √

Osmansagar and Himayathsagar Catchment Area Management √ √ √

Urban Renewal of Old City Areas

i) Water Supply Refurbishments for Old City area with in MCH - √ √ √ √ √ -

i) Water Supply Refurbishments for Old Town ships of surrounding - √ √ √ √ √ -

Municipalities

General Water Supply Improvements with in MCH

i) Additional Storage with inlet & outlet mains - √ √ √ √ √ -

ii) Laying of higher size trunk & distribution mains - √ √ √ √ √ -

Service Delivery iii) Refurbishments - √ √ √ √ √ -

General Water Supply Improvements in surrounding Municipalities

i) Additional Storage with inlet & outlet mains - √ √ √ √ √ -

ii) Laying of higher size trunk & distribution mains - √ √ √ √ √ -

iii) Refurbishments - √ √ √ √ √ -

Energy Conservation Measures √ √ √

Phasing out PSPs and legitimizing illegal connections √ √ √ √

Metering √ √ √ √ √ √

Piloting 24x7 zone by zone √ √ √ √ √ √

Citizens Relations Citizen feedback mechanisms to be established √ √ √ √

Management Complaint redressal made robust √ √ √

49
Sewerage Sector
Our vision is to create a vibrant community by providing high quality sewerage services
based on the principles of quality, equity, value and responsiveness.
Sewerage Sector - Strategy to achieve Vision and Goal (2005-2012)

Component Activity Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7

Comprehensive Sewerage Master Plan √ √ √

Energy Audit √ √

Sewerage Quality Studies and Monitoring √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Design &
Implement Design & Communication Strategy √ √ √ √ √ √ √
ation of
Human Resources Development √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Communic
ation Community Initiative Support √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Strategy
Private Sector Participation √ √ √ √ √ √

Ring fencing the accounts / Finances √ √

Tariff transition plan to recover the O&M costs √ √ √ √ √ √

Urban Renewal of Old City Areas

i) Sewerage Rehabilitation for Urban Renewal of Old City areas with in MCH - √ √ √ √ √ √

ii) Sewerage Rehabilitation for Urban Renewal of Old Townships of - √ √ √ √ √ √

Surrounding Municipalities

General Sewerage Improvements with in MCH

i) Construction of STPs - √ √ √ √ √ √

ii) Laying of conveying mains - √ √ √ √ √ √

iii) Laying of laterals and branch sewers √ √ √ √ √ √

Service Delivery
iii) Remodeling of sewers - √ √ √ √ √ √

General Sewerage Improvements for surrounding ULBs

i) Construction of STPs - √ √ √ √ √ √

ii) Laying of conveying mains - √ √ √ √ √ √

iii) Laying of laterals and branch sewers - √ √ √ √ √ √

iv) Remodeling of sewers - √ √ √ √ √ √

Recycling Plant & Reuse - √ √ √ √ √ √

Energy Conservation Measures - √ √ √ √ - -

50
Poverty Reduction - Strategy

The vision of Hyderabad is to become a city without slums by 2021

Poverty Reduction - Strategy to Achieve Vision And Goal (2005-2012)

20 20 20 20 20 20
200
Component Activities 0 0 0 1 1 1
9
6 7 8 0 1 2

Development of Comprehensive data base √

Conferring Tenural Rights √ √

Evolving a policy on Notification and Denotification √ √

Planning, Reforms and Institutional Strenthening and Capacity Building √ √ √

Governance Providing Access to Social Infrastructure (Health and Education) √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Evolving a comprehensive Livelihood Policy

IEC √ √ √ √ √ √

Strenthening CBOs √ √ √ √

Relocations of Slums located in Hazardous and vulnerable Areas √ √ √ √

Identification of Infrastructure and Housing Deficiencies √ √

Improvement in Infrastructure

Development of Basic Services to the Poor √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Water Supply & Sewerage √ √ √ √ √

Roads √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Street Lights √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Service delivery
Community Toilets √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Construction of Storm Water Drains including primary drains √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Environmental Improvement of Slums √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Solid Waste Management √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Civic Amenities, Community Halls, Child Care Centres √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Rehabilitation of existing assets √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Housing Infrastructure √ √ √ √ √ √ √

51
 Urban Renewal - Strategy
VISION :To “decongest the core area to enhance the quality of life and economically attractive
without disturbing the character”.
Urban Renewal - Strategy to achieve Vision and Goal (2005-2012)

Component Activities Institution Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7

Policy on Transfer of Development rights GoAP √

Revision of Building Bye-laws √

Grievance mechanism √

Strategy for PPP √

MCH
Pricing Policy for improvements √
Governance
IEC √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Motivation of the Citizens √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Traffic calming policies Police/ GoAP & √

MCH

Open Space policy GoAP/ MCH √

Removal of encroachments MCH √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Widening of narrow roads √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Relocation of parking areas MCH/ HUDA √ √

Transportation
Relocation of Bus shelters and bus stands MCH/ APSRTC √ √
Improveme
nts Pedestrian facilities MCH √ √ √

Construction of flyovers MCH/ HUDA √ √ √

Pedestrian safety programs and projects- MCH √ √ √ √ √ √ √

zebra crossings, dividers, etc.

Rehabilitation of storm water drainage MCH √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Street lighting MCH √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Solid Waste Management MCH √ √

Infrastructure Underground cabling MCH √ √
Improveme
nts Construction of Intercepting Sewers HMWSSB √ √ √

Construction of check dams MCH/ HMWSSB √

Open space revitalisation MCH √ √ √

Landscaping & recreation MCH/ HUDA √ √ √ √ √ √ √

52
Solid Waste Management Sector - Strategy

Solid Waste Management Sector - Strategy to achieve Vision and Goal (2005-2012)

Component Activity Institution Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7

Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan √ √

Training of functionaries √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Service Improvement Communication Strategy Development √ √

Communication Campaigns √ √ √ √ √ √

Support for Community Initiatives √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Source Segregation √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Primary Collection Door to Door Collection √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Installation of Storage Bins √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Vehicle tracking system ULB √ √ √

Secondary Collection & Vehicle Fleet √ √ √ √

Transportation
Transfer Stations Modernisation √ √ √

Waste Minimisation, Recycling √ √ √ √

Integrated Waste Treatment √ √ √

Disposal & Treatment Regional Sanitary Landfill Facility √ √ √

Scientific Closure of the abandoned dump sites √ √ √

Project Development Assistance (5% of the total) √ √ √ √ √ √ √

53
 Storm Water Drainage System - Strategy

Storm Water Drainage System - Strategy to achieve Vision and Goal (2005-2012)

Component Activity Institution Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7

Identification of Problem Areas ULB √ √ √

R& R Planning ULB √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Capacity Building
Comprehensive Drainage Master
HUDA √ √ √
Plan

Desilting & Removal of Weeds ULB √ √ √ √ √

Widening & Deepening ULB √ √ √ √

Primary Drains Construction of side walls &

ULB √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Rehabilitatio Lining
n
Diversion of drains ULB √ √ √ √ √ √

Construction of cross-drainage
ULB √ √ √ √ √ √ √
works

Drains on major arterial roads ULB √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Drains on interior roads ULB √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Construction of Conversion from kutcha to Pucca ULB √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Secondary &
Tertiary Rehabilitation of flood prone
ULB √ √ √ √ √ √
Drains areas

Rehabilitation of Nallas & Musi

ULB/HMWSSB √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Riverbed Improvement

Conservation of Lakes HUDA √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Identification of Problem Areas ULB √ √ √

R& R Planning ULB √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Capacity Building
Comprehensive Drainage Master
HUDA √ √ √
Plan

54
 Consolidated Sectoral Year wise Investment Plan (Rs. In crores)

Consolidated Sectoral Year wise Investment Plan (Rupees in Crores)

Sector Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Total

Water Supply 501 969 714 714 697 694 334 4,622

Sewerage 2 164 179 342 364 334 321 1,706

Storm Water Drains 46 210 310 370 369 377 382 2,064

Solid Waste Management 15 294 388 308 9 9 9 1,032

Traffic and Transportation 221 1,071 1,069 935 762 731 729 5,518

Urban Poverty 529 647 763 778 644 641 573 4,575

Urban Renewal 71.39 71.39 71.39 71.39 71.39 71.39 71.39 500

Total 1385.39 3426.39 3494.39 3518.39 2916.39 2857.39 2419.39 20,017

55
 Urban Infrastructure & Governance Sub-mission (Rs in Crs)

Institutions 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Total

Urban Infrastructure & Governance

Government of India (35%) 299.69 972.69 955.99 959.14 795.17 775.57 646.33 5,404.58

AP State Government (15%) 128.44 416.87 409.71 411.06 340.79 332.39 277.00 2,316.26

Sub-Total – A 428.13 1,389.56 1,365.70 1,370.20 1,135.96 1,107.96 923.33 7,720.84

Implementing Institutions (50%)

MCH & Surrounding Municipalities 172.95 571.80 642.05 573.50 337.00 325.50 327.03 2,949.80

HMWSB 252.68 572.60 459.00 540.50 542.75 526.25 340.00 3,233.78

HUDA 2.50 228.15 242.65 241.65 246.65 246.65 246.75 1,455.00

APSRTC - 17.00 22.00 14.55 9.55 9.55 9.55 82.20

Sub-Total – B 428.13 1,389.55 1,365.70 1,370.20 1,135.95 1,107.95 923.33 7,720.78

Total (A+B) 856.26 2,779.11 2,731.40 2,740.40 2,271.91 2,215.91 1,846.66 15,441.6

56
 Urban Basic Services for the Poor sub-mission (Rs in Crs)

Institutions 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Total

Urban Basic Services for the Poor

Government of India (50%) 264.50 323.50 381.50 389.00 322.00 320.50 286.50 2,287.5

AP State Government (10%) 14.70 31.20 42.80 44.30 30.90 30.60 23.00 217.50

Total – A 279.20 354.70 424.30 433.30 352.90 351.10 309.50 2,505.0

Implementing Institutions (40%)

MCH & Surrounding Municipalities 58.80 108.80 112.40 116.40 60.80 57.60 51.20 566.00

HMWSB - 16.00 58.80 60.80 62.80 64.80 40.80 304.00

AP State Housing Corporation * 191.00 167.50 167.50 167.50 167.50 167.50 171.50 1,200.0
2,070.0
Total – B 249.80 292.30 338.70 344.70 291.10 289.90 263.50 0

Grand Total (A+B) 529.00 647.00 763.00 778.00 644.00 641.00 573.00 4,575.0

57
Proposed Source of Funds for Execution - Project Works (Rs in Crs)

Institutions 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Total

Source of Funding

Government of India 564.19 1,296.19 1,337.49 1,348.14 1,117.17 1,096.07 932.83 7,692.08

AP State Government 143.14 448.07 452.51 455.36 371.69 362.99 300.00 2,533.76

707.33 1,744.26 1,790.00 1,803.50 1,488.86 1,459.06 1,232.83 10,225.8

Total – A

Implementing Institutions

MCH & Surrounding Municipalities 231.75 680.60 754.45 689.90 397.80 383.10 378.23 3,515.80

HMWSB 252.68 588.60 517.80 601.30 605.55 591.05 380.80 3,537.78

HUDA 2.50 228.15 242.65 241.65 246.65 246.65 246.75 1,455.00

AP State Housing Corporation 191.00 167.50 167.50 167.50 167.50 167.50 171.50 1,200.00

APSRTC - 17.00 22.00 14.55 9.55 9.55 9.55 82.20

Total – B 677.93 1,681.85 1,704.40 1,714.90 1,427.05 1,397.85 1,186.83 9,790.78

1,385.26 3,426.11 3,494.40 3,518.40 2,915.91 2,856.91 2,419.66 20,016.6

Grand Total (A+B)

58
Financial Operational Plan of MCH& Surrounding ULBs

C - Total Revenue Income 802.12 892.01 998.09 1121.38 1,260.81 1421.45 1,608.42 8,104.28

D – Bifurcation of Revenue Expenditure

Debt Service *** 8.86 34.19 54.71 68.84 78.9 89.98 100.95 436.42
O & M Expenses **** - 24.64 95.42 173.68 245.58 286.88 326.63 1,152.83
Revenue Expenditure – Others 452.83 452.87 446.96 465.06 516.26 624.6 768.13 3,752.30
E- Total Revenue Expenditure 461.69 511.7 597.09 707.58 840.74 1001.45 1,195.71 5,315.96
F - Total Surplus 340.43 380.31 401 413.8 420.07 420 412.71 2,788.32

G – Source for Additional Expenditure (JNNURM)

Central Government Share 194.56 536.26 589.93 546.95 311.9 299.85 292.92 2,772.36
State Government Share 66.58 198.74 220.71 201.15 116.3 112.05 110.91 1,026.44

JNNURM Funds from Govt 261.15 735 810.65 748.1 428.2 411.9 403.83 3,798.80

Own Contribution (ULBs) # 170.22 190.16 200.5 206.9 210.04 210 206.36 1,394.18
Public Private Participation - 250 300 300 50 50 50 1,000.00
Net Status 170.22 190.16 200.5 206.9 210.04 210 206.36 1,394.18

59
Financial Operational Plan of MCH& Surrounding ULBs

Base Case (“do nothing”)

A – MCH

Revenue Income 555.74 615.92 672.44 739.88 816.42 906.25 1,013.48 5,320.13

Revenue Expenditure 356.17 383.41 440.95 517.38 608.81 718.38 849.92 3,875.02

A – Surplus/Deficit 199.57 232.51 231.49 222.5 207.61 187.86 163.56 1,445.10

B - Surrounding ULBs

Revenue Income 246.38 271 298.75 330.06 365.42 405.4 450.63 2,367.64

Revenue Expenditure 105.52 128.29 156.14 190.2 231.93 283.07 345.79 1,440.94

B – Surplus/Deficit 140.85 142.7 142.61 139.85 133.5 122.33 104.83 926.67

WITH REFORMS scenario

I – MCH

Revenue Income 555.74 615.92 688.52 774.06 870.92 983.51 1,116.23 5,604.90

Revenue Expenditure 356.17 383.41 440.95 517.38 608.81 718.38 849.92 3,875.02

A – Surplus/Deficit 199.57 232.51 247.57 256.67 262.11 265.13 266.31 1,729.87

II – Surrounding ULBs

Revenue Income 246.38 276.09 309.57 347.32 389.89 437.94 492.19 2,499.38

Revenue Expenditure 105.52 128.29 156.14 190.2 231.93 283.07 345.79 1,440.94

B – Surplus/Deficit 140.85 147.8 153.44 157.11 157.97 154.87 146.39 1,058.43

60
Implementation mechanism - Ongoing Projects

 Regular Monitoring & Appraisal of ongoing projects

 Capacity support at project level and at ULB level

– Project monitoring Unit
– Project Management -outsourced for certain identified
projects
– Regular training for Staff to manage works at ULB level

 Reform monitoring unit to be setup

– with civil society reps, NGOs as reps

 Innovative e- Governance Initiatives adopted

61
62