Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Published by:
The Secretariat of Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan
Administrative Tribunals and Special Courts
Annual Report 2014
Published by:
The Secretariat of Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan
Supreme Court Building, Islamabad
www.ljcp.gov.pk
Contents at a Glance
1 Accountability Courts 7
5 Drug Courts 69
Contents
Summary of the Performance ....................................................................................................................................... 3
i
Contents
2.3 Consolidated Statement of Anti-Dumping Appellate Tribunal ....................................................................... 37
ii
Contents
5.10 Drug Court, Karachi ......................................................................................................................................... 77
9.3 Consolidated Statement of Special Courts (Control of Narcotic Substances) .............................................. 112
iii
Contents
9.4 Special Court (Control of Narcotic Substances), Lahore ............................................................................... 113
10.3 Consolidated Statement of Special Courts (Customs, Taxation & Anti-Smuggling) ..................................... 122
10.4 Special Court (Customs, Taxation & Anti Smuggling), Rawalpindi ............................................................... 123
10.5 Special Court (Customs, Taxation & Anti Smuggling), Lahore ...................................................................... 124
10.6 Special Court (Customs, Taxation & Anti Smuggling), Karachi ..................................................................... 125
10.7 Special Court (Customs, Taxation & Anti Smuggling), Peshawar ................................................................. 126
iv
Contents
13.6 Banking Court - I, Faisalabad......................................................................................................................... 147
14.4 Commercial Court for Punjab & Khyber Pakhtunkhwa at Lahore ................................................................ 179
v
Contents
15. Federal Service Tribunal .............................................................................................................................. 183
vi
Contents
18.10 Anti-Corruption Court, Gujranwala .............................................................................................................. 217
vii
Contents
19.22 Anti-Terrorism Court – V, Karachi ................................................................................................................ 251
19.47 Anti-Terrorism Court -III, Swat at Timergara, Dir Lower .............................................................................. 276
19.48 Anti-Terrorism Court -IV, Swat at Camp Court Kabal/Kanju ........................................................................ 277
19.49 Anti-Terrorism Court - V, Matta Swat at Camp Court Batkhela ................................................................... 278
viii
Contents
19.55 Anti-Terrorism Court, Khuzdar...................................................................................................................... 284
ix
Contents
21.13 Labour Court – XI, Dera Ghazi Khan ............................................................................................................. 323
x
Contents
24.1 Establishment of Lahore Development Authority Tribunal .......................................................................... 359
25.3 Consolidated Statement of Special Court of Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) ........................ 366
25.4 Special Court of Public Property (Removal of Encroachment), Karachi ........................................................ 367
25.5 Special Court of Public Property (Removal of Encroachment), Hyderabad .................................................. 368
xi
|1
Foreword
The Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan’s annual report on the Administrative Tribunals
and Special Courts for the year 2014 provides performance statistics for the administrative
tribunals and special courts established by the Federal and provincial governments under
different statutes. Beside statistical data on cases, the report also provides detailed information
about the sanctioned / working strength and vacant posts of judicial officers as well as
administrative staff and annual budgetary allocations for the courts.
We hope this report will enable the stakeholders to evaluate the performance of the courts and
formulate strategies for improving the quality of justice service delivery.
As part of our continuing effort to improve our services and transparency, and pursuant to the
Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan’s 39th Meeting held on 17 August 2015, the Secretariat
has initiated the process to strengthen information and datasets to enable more informed
analysis of the quality and reach of the administration of justice in country. To this end, as well
as gathering supply-side information, efforts are also being made to capture more demand-side
data as a baseline for justice needs and evaluating performance. By strengthening the LJCP’s
analytic capacities, it is hoped that data in future will be more accessible and informative for a
wider range of stakeholders, and more amenable to translating it into policy prescriptions.
This report is also placed on our website to enable greater access to information.
We would also welcome any suggestions to improve the quality of statistics and information
provided.
Secretary
Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan
14 Commercial Courts 2 22 7 0 29 4 25
1. Accountability Courts
1.1 Establishment of Accountability Courts
Accountability Courts are established after promulgation of the National Accountability
Ordinance, 1999. The purpose of establishment of the Accountability Courts is to
eradicate corruption, corrupt practices, misuse or abuse of power or authority,
misappropriation of property, taking of kickbacks, commissions and hold accountable all
those persons accused of such charges. The Accountability Courts have exclusive
jurisdiction to try all the offences mentioned in the Schedule to the said Ordinance.
Accountability Court shall consist of a Judge who shall be appointed by the President of
Pakistan, in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court of the Province
concerned. A serving District and Sessions Judge qualified to be appointed as Judge of
the High Court or retired District and Sessions Judge, can be appointed as Judge of
Accountability Court.
350
300
250
200
150 307
100
118
50
0
Institution during 2014 Disposal during 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 18 1 1 0
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 0 1
5 Reader 11 1 1 0
6 UDC 9 1 1 0
7 LDC 7 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 1 0 1
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 18 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 0 1
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 11 1 1 0
6 UDC 9 1 1 0
7 LDC 7 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 1 0 1
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 0 1
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 0 1
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 18 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 11 1 0 1
6 UDC 9 1 1 0
7 LDC 7 1 0 1
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 1 1 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 0 1
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 0 1
2 Registrar 18 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 0 1
5 Reader 11 1 0 1
6 UDC 9 1 1 0
7 LDC 7 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 1 1 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 0 1
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 18 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 0 1
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 11 1 1 0
6 UDC 9 1 1 0
7 LDC 7 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 1 0 1
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 0 1
2 Registrar 18 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 0 1
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 11 1 0 1
6 UDC 9 1 1 0
7 LDC 7 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 1 0 1
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 18 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 0 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 11 1 1 0
6 UDC 9 1 1 0
7 LDC 7 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 1 1 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 0 1
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 18 1 1 0
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 11 1 0 1
6 UDC 9 1 1 0
7 LDC 7 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 1 1 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 18 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 11 1 1 0
6 UDC 9 1 1 0
7 LDC 7 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 1 1 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 17 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 0 1
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 9 1 0 1
6 UDC 9 1 0 1
7 LDC 7 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Grade 1 to 3 - 4 4 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 17 1 1 0
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 9 1 1 0
6 UDC 9 1 1 0
7 LDC 7 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Grade 1 to 3 - 4 4 0
1 Judge 21 1 0 1
2 Registrar 18 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 0 1
5 Reader 11 1 0 1
6 UDC 9 1 0 1
7 LDC 7 1 0 1
8 Driver 4 1 0 1
9 Qasid 3 1 0 1
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 0 1
11 Chowkidar 1 1 0 1
12 Sweeper 1 1 0 1
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 18 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 11 1 1 0
6 UDC 9 1 1 0
7 LDC 7 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 1 1 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 18 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 11 1 1 0
6 UDC 9 1 1 0
7 LDC 7 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 1 1 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 0 1
2 Registrar 17 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 0 1
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 9 1 0 1
6 UDC 9 1 1 0
7 LDC 7 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Grade 1 to 3 - 4 4 0
1 Judge 21 1 0 1
2 Registrar 18 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 11 1 0 1
6 UDC 9 1 1 0
7 LDC 7 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 4 4 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 18 1 1 0
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 11 1 1 0
6 UDC 9 1 1 0
7 LDC 7 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 1 1 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 0 1
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 18 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 11 1 1 0
6 UDC 9 1 1 0
7 LDC 7 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 1 1 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 0 1
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 18 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 11 1 1 0
6 UDC 9 1 0 1
7 LDC 7 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 1 1 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 0 1
12 Sweeper 1 1 0 1
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 18 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 11 1 1 0
6 UDC 9 1 1 0
7 LDC 7 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 1 1 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 0 1
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 17 1 1 0
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 9 1 1 0
6 UDC 9 1 1 0
7 LDC 7 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Grade 1 to 3 - 4 3 1
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 17 1 1 0
3 APS 16 1 0 1
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 9 1 1 0
6 UDC 9 1 1 0
7 LDC 7 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Grade 1 to 3 - 4 3 1
than thirty days of its decision. The Appellate Tribunal may call for and examine the
official records of an investigation conducted by the Commission and any other
information or documents relied upon by the Commission in reaching a determination
appealed against for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the legality or propriety of an
impugned determination of the Commission.
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
35
32
30
25
20
15
10
0
0
Institution during 2014 Disposal during 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
2 Member 22 2 2 0
3 Registrar 17 1 0 1
4 Private Secretary 17 3 1 2
6 APS/APS 16 3 3 0
7 Reader 14 1 1 0
8 Computer Operator 14 1 0 1
9 Stenotypist 14 1 0 1
10 UDC 9 2 0 2
11 LDC 7 3 0 3
12 Bailiff 5 2 0 2
13 Driver 4 4 3 1
14 Dispatch Rider 4 1 1 0
15 Cook 2 1 0 1
16 Qasid 2 1 0 1
17 Room Bearer 1 1 0 1
18 Naib Qasid 1 5 5 0
19 Mali 1 1 1 0
20 Farash 1 1 1 0
21 Chowkidar 1 3 2 1
22 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
Month-wise Breakup
January 46 0 0 46 0 46
February 46 0 0 46 0 46
March 46 0 0 46 1 45
April 45 0 0 45 0 45
May 45 0 0 45 0 45
June 45 0 0 45 0 45
July 45 0 0 45 31 14
August 14 0 0 14 0 14
September 14 0 0 14 0 14
October 14 0 0 14 0 14
November 14 0 0 14 0 14
December 14 0 0 14 0 14
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
14111
6000
10373
4000
2000
0
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
2 Judicial Member 21 2 2 1
3 Member Accounting 21 3 3 0
4 Registrar 19 1 1 0
5 Senior Private Secretary 19 1 1 0
6 Deputy Registrar 17 1 1 0
7 Private Secretary 17 5 0 5
8 Assistant Registrar 16 2 2 0
9 Assistant Private Secretary 16 6 6 0
10 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
11 Assistant 14 1 1 0
12 Superintendent 13 1 1 0
13 Supervisor 10 3 2 1
14 UDC 7 7 7 0
15 LDC 5 15 15 0
16 Driver 5 6 2 4
17 Daftary 3 4 4 0
18 Qasid 3 6 6 0
19 Naib Qasid 2 18 13 5
20 Chowkidar 2 3 2 1
21 Farash 2 2 2 0
22 Sweeper 1 2 2 0
Month-wise Breakup
2 Judicial Member 21 9 4 5
3 Accountant Member 21 9 3 6
4 Private Secretary 17 14 14 0
5 Deputy Registrar 17 1 0 1
6 Assistant Registrar 16 8 6 2
7 APS/APS 16 16 16 0
8 Supervisor 10 9 8 1
9 UDC 9 18 17 1
10 LDC 7 45 43 2
11 Driver 5 15 3 12
12 Qasid 3 17 17 0
13 Daftry 3 9 9 0
14 Naib Qasid 2 46 46 0
15 Chowidar 2 8 3 5
16 Farash 2 8 3 5
17 Sweeper 2 7 7 0
18 Mali 2 1 1 0
shall be decided within sixty days of filing the appeal or within such extended period as
the Tribunal may, for reasons to be recorded in writing thinks fit. The Appellate Tribunal
may, at any time within one year from the date of order, with a view to rectifying any
mistake apparent from the record, amend any order passed by it and shall make such
amendments if the mistake is brought to its notice by the Collector of Customs or the
other party to the appeal, provided that an amendment which has the effect of
enhancing the assessment or reducing a refund or otherwise increasing the liability of
the other party shall not be made under this sub-section, unless the Appellate Tribunal
has given notice to the party of its intention to do so and has allowed a reasonable
opportunity of being heard.
which they differ shall be decided by the Chairman. Subject to the provisions of this Act,
the Appellate Tribunal shall have power to regulate its own procedure and the
procedure of the Benches thereof in all matters arising out of the exercise of its powers
or of the discharge of its functions, including the places at which the Benches shall hold
their sittings. The Appellate Tribunal shall, for the purposes of discharging its functions,
have the same powers as are vested in a court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
(V of 1908), in respect of matters of discovery and inspection, enforcing the attendance
of any person and examining him on oath, compelling the production of books of
account and other documents and issuing Commissions.
Custom Appellate Tribunals has eight Benches, three at Karachi, two each at Lahore and
Islamabad and one at Peshawar. Each Bench consists of two Members (B-21).
7000
6000
5000
4000
2000
1000
0
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
5. Drug Courts
5.1 Establishment of Drug Courts
The Drugs Act, 1976 was enforced to regulate the import, export, manufacture, storage,
distribution and sale of drugs. Under section 31 of the Act, the Federal Government and,
if so directed by the Federal Government, the Provincial Government may establish as
many Drug Courts to exercise jurisdiction under this Act as it considers necessary. A
Drug Court shall consist of a person who is, or has been or is qualified for appointment
as a Judge of a High Court, who shall be the Chairman, and two members being persons
who, in the opinion of the Federal Government, are experts in the medical or
pharmaceutical fields.
A Drug Court shall have all the powers conferred by the Code of Criminal Procedure,
1898 (Act V of 1898) on a Court of Sessions exercising original jurisdiction. A person
sentenced by a Drug Court may prefer an appeal to a Bench of the High Court consisting
of not less than two Judges within thirty days of the judgment.
5.2 Procedure of Drug Courts
No Court other than a Drug Court shall try an offence punishable under Chapter 4 of the
said Act i.e. relating to offences, penalties and procedure. The Drug Court shall, in all
matters with respect to which no procedure has been prescribed by this Act, follow the
procedure prescribed by the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 for the trial of summons
cases by magistrates.
At present nine Drug Courts are functioning under the Drugs Act, 1976 presided over by
a Chairman. In four Drug Courts at Lahore, Rawalpindi, Faisalabad and Bahawalpur, the
Chairmen have been appointed by the Federal Government whereas the funds for these
courts and provision of other facilities are to be arranged by the Provincial Government.
The Chairmen in those Drug Courts working on full time basis, have been appointed
from the Provincial Judiciary on deputation. However, the work of part-time Drug Court
at Peshawar and Quetta has been assigned to one of our Judges in the Federal Courts at
both these places in addition to their own duties.
4000
3000
2000
3445
3127
1000
0
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
2 Member - 2 2 0
Month-wise Breakup
January 5 0 0 5 0 5
February 5 0 0 5 0 5
March 5 0 0 5 2 3
April 3 0 0 3 0 3
May 3 0 0 3 1 2
June 2 0 0 2 0 2
July 2 0 0 2 0 2
August 2 0 0 2 1 1
September 1 0 0 1 0 1
October 1 0 0 1 0 1
November 1 0 0 1 0 1
December 1 0 0 1 0 1
The Act also provides for the establishment of the Pakistan Environmental Protection
Agency at Federal and provincial level to exercise the powers and perform the functions
assigned to it under this Act and the rules and regulations made there under and to take
all necessary measures for the implementation of the National Environmental Policies
approved by the Council.
6.1 Establishment of the Tribunals
Under section 20 of the said Act the Federal Government may by notification in the
official gazette establish as many Environmental Tribunals as it considers necessary and
where it establishes more than one Environmental Tribunals, it shall specify territorial
limits within which or the class of cases in respect of which each one of them shall
exercise jurisdiction under this Act. An Environmental Tribunal shall consist of a
Chairperson who is or has been or is qualified for appointment as a judge of the High
Court to be appointed after consultation with the Chief Justice of the concerned High
Court and two members to be appointed by the Federal Government of which at least
one shall be a technical member with suitable professional qualification and experience
in the environmental field as may be prescribed.
6.2 Right of Appeal
Any person aggrieved by any order or direction of the Federal or Provincial Agency
passed under any provision of this Act or rules or regulations made there under may
prefer an appeal with the Environmental Tribunal within thirty days of the date of
communication of the order or direction to such person. An appeal to the
Environmental Tribunal shall be in such form, contain such particulars and be
accompanied by such fees as may be prescribed. Any person aggrieved by any final
order or by any sentence of the Environmental Tribunal passed under this Act may
within thirty days of communication of such order or sentence, prefer an appeal to the
High Court. At present there are five Environmental Protection Tribunals constituted
under the Environmental Protection Act, 1997, functioning in Islamabad, Lahore,
Karachi, Peshawar and Quetta.
50
45
40
35
30
25
45
20
35
15
10
0
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
2 Member Technical 21 1 0 1
3 Member Legal 20 1 0 1
4 Registrar 17 1 1 0
5 Private Secretary 17 1 0 1
6 APS 16 3 2 1
7 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
8 Reader 11 1 1 0
9 UDC 9 1 0 1
10 LDC 7 1 1 0
11 Drivers 4&5 3 2 1
12 Bailiffs 2 2 2 0
13 Naib Qasids 2 3 3 0
14 Chowkidars 2 2 2 0
15 Mali 2 1 0 1
16 Farash 1 1 1 0
17 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
Month-wise Breakup
January 13 0 0 13 0 13
February 13 0 0 13 0 13
March 13 0 0 13 0 13
April 13 0 0 13 0 13
May 13 0 0 13 0 13
June 13 0 0 13 0 13
July 13 0 0 13 0 13
August 13 0 0 13 0 13
September 13 0 0 13 0 13
October 13 0 0 13 0 13
November 13 0 0 13 0 13
December 13 0 0 13 0 13
320
280
240
200
160 311
120
80
40 15
0
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
2 LDC 7 1 1 0
3 Daftary 3 1 1 0
4 Naib Qasid 2 1 0 1
5 Sweeper 1 1 0 1
Month-wise Breakup
January 20 0 0 20 0 20
February 20 0 0 20 0 20
March 20 0 0 20 0 20
April 20 0 0 20 0 20
May 20 0 0 20 0 20
June 20 0 0 20 0 20
July 20 0 0 20 0 20
August 20 0 0 20 0 20
September 20 0 0 20 3 17
October 17 2 0 19 0 19
November 19 0 0 19 0 19
December 19 0 0 19 0 19
2 UDC 9 1 0 1
3 Bailiff 2 1 1 0
4 Daftary 3 1 0 1
Month-wise Breakup
March 1 0 0 1 0 1
April 1 0 0 1 0 1
May 1 8 0 9 1 8
June 8 3 0 11 8 3
July 3 1 0 4 0 4
August 4 0 0 4 0 4
September 4 0 0 4 0 4
October 4 1 0 5 0 5
November 5 0 1 6 0 6
December 6 0 0 6 0 6
5530
5525
5520
5515
5510
5526
5505
5500
5506
5495
5490
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
Month-wise Breakup
2 APS 16 1 0 1
3 Reader 11 1 0 1
4 UDC 9 1 1 0
5 LDC 7 1 1 0
6 Driver 4 1 1 0
7 Grade 1-3 - 3 2 1
Month-wise Breakup
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 11 1 1 0
4 UDC 9 1 1 0
5 LDC 7 1 1 0
6 Driver 4 1 0 1
7 Grade 1-3 - 3 3 0
Month-wise Breakup
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 11 1 1 0
4 UDC 9 1 1 0
5 LDC 7 1 0 1
6 Driver 4 1 1 0
7 Grade 1-3 - 2 2 0
Month-wise Breakup
January 65 17 0 82 7 75
February 75 5 0 80 7 73
March 73 5 0 78 7 71
April 71 17 0 88 14 74
May 74 10 0 84 8 76
June 76 11 0 87 5 82
July 82 5 0 87 3 84
August 84 3 0 87 3 84
September 84 3 0 87 1 86
October 86 10 0 96 11 85
November 85 22 0 107 19 88
December 88 5 0 93 9 84
2200
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000 2004
800
600
400 888
200
0
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
500
450
400
350
300
250
465
200 386
150
100
50
0
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
500
450
400
350
300
250
456
200
367
150
100
50
0
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
members and if there is a difference of opinion among its members, the opinion of the
majority shall prevail provided that where the members are equally divided on any point
it shall be decided in accordance with the views of the Chairperson. The Ordinance also
provides that the decision of a Tribunal shall be given in writing and shall be signed by
the Chairperson and a copy thereof shall be given by the Tribunal to each party to the
dispute and a copy shall also be forwarded to the Commission.
12.3 Appeal
Under section 124 of the said Ordinance the decision of the Tribunal on any application
shall be final and shall not be questioned in any Court or before any other Authority.
However, any party aggrieved by a decision of the Tribunal may, if the amount of the
claim in dispute or the penalty prescribed, as the case may be, is not less than one
hundred thousand rupees, prefer an appeal to the High Court within a period of thirty
days from the date of such decision to be heard by a Bench of not less than two judges
of the High Court having territorial jurisdiction over the relevant Tribunal.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
12
10
6
11
2 4
0
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
2 Member 20 1 0 1
3 APS 16 2 1 1
4 Reader 11 1 0 1
5 UDC 9 2 2 0
6 Driver 5 1 0 1
7 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
Month-wise Breakup
January 70 0 0 70 1 69
February 69 3 0 72 0 72
March 72 0 0 72 0 72
April 72 0 0 72 0 72
May 72 0 0 72 1 71
June 71 0 0 71 0 71
July 71 2 0 73 1 72
August 72 1 0 73 0 73
September 73 2 0 75 1 74
October 74 0 0 74 0 74
November 74 0 0 74 0 74
December 74 3 0 77 0 77
27000
24000
21000
18000
15000
26772
12000
22474
9000
6000
3000
0
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 17 1 1 0
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Reader 11 1 1 0
5 Nazir 8 1 0 1
6 UDC 9 3 3 0
7 LDC 7 2 2 0
8 Driver 5 1 1 0
9 Bailiff 2 2 2 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 2 1 1
11 Farash 2 1 1 0
12 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
13 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Personnel Secretary 18 1 1 0
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Reader 11 1 1 0
5 Nazir 8 1 1 0
6 UDC 9 3 3 0
7 LDC 7 2 1 1
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Bailiff 1 2 2 0
10 Naib Qasid 1 2 2 0
11 Farash 1 1 1 0
12 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
13 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 11 1 1 0
4 Nazir 8 1 1 0
5 UDC 9 3 3 0
6 LDC 7 2 2 0
7 Driver 5 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 2 1 1 0
9 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
10 Farash 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 0 1
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 11 1 1 0
4 Nazir 8 1 1 0
5 UDC 9 3 3 0
6 LDC 7 2 2 0
7 Driver 5 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 2 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
10 Farash 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 11 1 0 1
4 Nazir 8 1 1 0
5 UDC 9 3 3 0
6 LDC 7 2 2 0
7 Driver 5 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 2 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
10 Farash 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 11 1 1 0
4 Nazir 8 1 1 0
5 UDC 9 3 3 0
6 LDC 7 2 1 1
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
7 Bailiff 2 2 1 1
9 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
10 Farash 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
Statement Showing Institution, Disposal and Pendency of Cases
Pendency on Institution Transferred/ Total Disposal during Balance on
1-1-2014 during the Abated the year 31-12-2014
year
683 1231 0 1941 1139 775
Month-wise Breakup
January 683 120 0 803 149 654
February 654 115 0 769 89 680
March 680 110 0 790 86 704
April 704 138 0 842 76 766
May 766 111 0 877 141 736
June 736 116 0 852 113 739
July 739 81 0 820 74 746
August 746 29 0 775 21 754
September 754 89 0 843 52 791
October 791 104 0 895 131 764
November 764 98 0 862 131 731
December 731 120 0 851 76 775
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 11 1 1 0
4 Nazir 8 1 1 0
5 UDC 9 3 3 0
6 LDC 7 2 2 0
7 Driver 5 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 2 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
10 Farash 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 11 1 1 0
4 Nazir 8 1 1 0
5 UDC 9 3 3 0
6 LDC 7 2 2 0
7 Bailiff 2 2 2 0
8 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
9 Farash 2 1 1 0
10 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
11 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 17 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Reader 11 1 1 0
5 Nazir 8 1 1 0
6 UDC 9 3 3 0
7 LDC 7 2 2 0
8 Driver 5 1 1 0
9 Bailif 2 2 2 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
11 Farash 2 1 1 0
12 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
13 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 11 1 1 0
4 Nazir 8 1 1 0
5 UDC 9 3 3 0
6 LDC 7 2 2 0
7 Driver 5 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 3 1 1 0
9 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
10 Farash 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 0 1
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 17 1 1 0
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Reader 11 1 1 0
5 UDC 9 3 3 0
6 Nazir 8 1 1 0
7 LDC 7 2 2 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Bailiff 1 2 1 1
10 Naib Qasid 1 2 2 0
11 Farash 1 1 1 0
12 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
13 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
Statement Showing Institution, Disposal and Pendency of Cases
Pendency on Institution Transferred/ Total Disposal during Balance on
1-1-2014 during the Abated the year 31-12-2014
year
1296 389 0 1685 482 1111
Month-wise Breakup
January 1296 35 0 1331 70 1261
February 1261 60 0 1321 61 1260
March 1260 32 0 1292 55 1237
April 1237 36 0 1273 57 1216
May 1216 14 0 1230 58 1172
June 1172 17 0 1189 37 1152
July 1152 37 0 1189 31 1158
August 1158 53 0 1211 31 1180
September 1180 19 0 1199 18 1181
October 1181 2 0 1183 1 1182
November 1182 58 0 1240 15 1225
December *1133 26 0 1159 48 1111
*Difference of -92 cases found in the month of December due to Physical Verification
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 11 1 1 0
4 Nazir 8 1 1 0
5 UDC 9 3 3 0
6 LDC 7 2 2 0
7 Driver 4 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 1 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 1 2 2 0
10 Farash 1 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 11 1 1 0
4 Nazir 8 1 1 0
5 UDC 9 3 2 1
6 LDC 7 2 1 1
7 Driver 4 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 1 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 1 2 2 0
10 Farash 1 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 0 1
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 0 1
3 Reader 11 1 1 0
4 Nazir 8 1 1 0
5 UDC 9 3 3 0
6 LDC 7 2 2 0
7 Driver 4 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 1 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 1 2 1 1
10 Farash 1 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 0 1
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 11 1 1 0
4 Nazir 8 1 1 0
5 UDC 9 3 3 0
6 LDC 7 2 2 0
7 Driver 5 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 2 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 2 2 1 1
10 Farash 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 0 1
2 Registrar 18 1 1 0
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Reader 11 1 1 0
5 Nazir 8 1 1 0
6 UDC 9 3 3 0
7 LDC 7 2 2 0
8 Driver 5 1 1 0
9 Bailiff 2 2 2 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
11 Farash 2 1 1 0
12 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
13 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
Statement Showing Institution, Disposal and Pendency of Cases
Pendency on Institution Transferred/ Total Disposal during Balance on
1-1-2014 during the Abated the year 31-12-2014
year
1783 345 0 2128 403 1725
Month-wise Breakup
January 1783 51 0 1834 43 1791
February 1791 49 0 1840 54 1786
March 1786 60 0 1846 36 1810
April 1810 4 0 1814 3 1811
May 1811 0 0 1811 5 1806
June 1806 18 0 1824 70 1754
July 1754 2 0 1756 34 1722
August 1722 41 0 1763 22 1741
September 1741 16 0 1757 47 1710
October 1710 38 0 1748 52 1696
November 1696 47 0 1743 27 1716
December 1716 19 0 1735 10 1725
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 11 1 1 0
4 Nazir 8 1 0 1
5 UDC 9 3 3 0
6 LDC 7 2 2 0
7 Driver 4 1 0 1
8 Bailiff 1 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 1 2 2 0
10 Farash 1 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
13 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 11 1 1 0
4 Nazir 8 1 1 0
5 UDC 9 3 3 0
6 LDC 7 2 2 0
7 Driver 4 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 1 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 1 2 2 0
10 Farash 1 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 11 1 1 0
4 Nazir 8 1 1 0
5 UDC 9 3 2 1
6 LDC 7 2 2 0
7 Driver 5 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 3 1 1 0
9 Qasid 2 2 2 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Farash 2 1 1 0
12 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
13 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 11 1 1 0
4 Nazir 8 1 1 0
5 UDC 9 3 3 0
6 LDC 7 2 2 0
7 Driver 5 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 3 1 1 0
9 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
10 Farash 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 11 1 1 0
4 Nazir 8 1 1 0
5 UDC 9 3 3 0
6 LDC 7 2 2 0
7 Driver 5 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 3 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
10 Farash 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 11 1 1 0
4 Nazir 8 1 1 0
5 UDC 9 3 2 1
6 LDC 7 2 2 0
7 Driver 5 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 2 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
10 Farash 2 1 0 1
11 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 17 1 1 0
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Reader 11 1 1 0
5 Nazir 8 1 1 0
6 UDC 9 3 3 0
7 LDC 7 2 2 0
8 Driver 5 1 1 0
9 Bailiff 2 2 1 1
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Farash 2 1 1 0
12 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
13 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 0 1
3 Reader 11 1 1 0
4 Nazir 8 1 1 0
5 UDC 9 3 3 0
6 LDC 7 2 2 0
7 Driver 5 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 2 2 1 1
9 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
10 Farash 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 17 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Reader 11 1 1 0
5 Nazir 8 1 1 0
6 UDC 9 3 3 0
7 LDC 7 2 2 0
8 Driver 5 1 1 0
9 Bailiff 2 2 2 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
11 Farash 2 1 1 0
12 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
13 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
4
7
3
2 4
0
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
1 APS 16 2 2 0
2 Reader 11 1 0 1
3 LDC 7 1 1 0
4 Qasid 3 1 1 0
5 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
6 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
Month-wise Breakup
January 18 0 0 18 0 18
February 18 0 0 18 0 18
March 18 0 0 18 0 18
April 18 0 0 18 0 18
May 18 0 0 18 0 18
June 18 0 0 18 0 18
July 18 0 0 18 0 18
August 18 0 0 18 0 18
September 18 0 0 18 0 18
October 18 0 0 18 0 18
November 18 0 0 18 0 18
December 18 0 0 18 0 18
1 Reader 11 1 1 0
2 UDC 9 1 1 0
3 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
Month-wise Breakup
January 4 0 0 4 0 4
February 4 0 0 4 1 3
March 3 0 0 3 0 3
April 3 0 0 3 0 3
May 3 0 0 3 1 2
June 2 4 0 6 1 5
July 5 2 0 7 0 7
August 7 1 0 8 0 8
September 8 0 0 8 0 8
October 8 0 0 8 0 8
November 8 0 0 8 1 7
December 7 0 0 7 0 7
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
1516
600
400
514
200
0
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
2 Member 21&22 10 10 0
3 Registrar 19 1 1 0
4 Deputy Registrar 18 3 0 3
5 Administrative Officer 17 1 1 0
7 Assistant Registrar 17 4 3 1
8 Superintendent 16 1 0 1
9 Reader 16 5 2 3
10 APS 16 8 5 3
11 Assistant in charge 15 2 2 0
12 Assistant 14 6 5 1
13 Stenotypist 14 3 3 0
14 Library Assistant 12 1 1 0
15 UDC 9 9 9 0
16 LDC 7 12 12 0
17 Driver 4 13 13 0
18 Dispatch Rider 4 2 2 0
19 D.M.O 4 1 1 0
20 Qasid 2 10 8 2
21 Naib Qasid 1 16 16 0
22 Process Server 1 3 3 0
23 Daftary 1 1 1 0
24 Record Sorter 1 1 0 1
25 Farash 1 3 2 1
26 Mali 1 2 2 0
27 Chowkidar 1 3 3 0
28 Sweeper 1 4 4 0
Month-wise Breakup
January 4097 41 0 4138 0 4138
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
28
24
20
16
12
0 0
0
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
July 49 0 0 49 0 49
August 49 0 0 49 0 49
September 49 0 0 49 0 49
October 49 0 0 49 0 49
November 49 0 0 49 0 49
December 49 0 0 49 0 49
9000
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000 8033
3000
5243
2000
1000
0
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
3454 3596
1500
1000
500
0
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
0 2000 4000
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
5500
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500 5055
2000
1500 3113
1000
500
0
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
3 Assistant 14 2 2 0
4 Driver 4 1 1 0
5 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
6 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
7 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
Month-wise Breakup
January 31 4 -1 34 5 29
February 29 4 -1 32 9 23
March 23 6 -2 27 5 22
April 22 18 -1 39 11 28
May 28 2 0 30 3 27
June 27 3 0 30 0 30
July 30 0 0 30 0 30
August 30 6 0 36 2 34
September 34 7 0 41 8 33
October 33 11 0 44 6 38
November 38 5 -4 39 5 34
December 34 6 -1 39 6 33
3 Assistant 14 2 2 0
4 Driver 4 1 1 0
5 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
6 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
7 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
Month-wise Breakup
January 28 10 -1 37 7 30
February 30 7 0 37 10 27
March 27 13 -4 36 8 28
April 28 11 -1 38 9 29
May 29 9 -1 37 9 28
June 28 15 -1 42 10 32
July 32 5 0 37 2 35
August 35 5 0 40 5 35
September 35 8 0 43 7 36
October 36 5 -2 39 0 39
November 39 2 0 41 0 41
December 41 1 -1 41 0 41
2 APS 16 2 2 0
3 Assistant 14 2 2 0
4 Driver 4 1 1 0
5 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
6 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
7 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
January 38 2 0 40 9 31
February 31 5 0 36 11 25
March 25 10 -2 33 11 22
April 22 15 -3 34 13 21
May 21 13 0 34 8 26
June 26 12 -3 35 3 32
July 32 10 -2 40 7 33
August 33 5 0 38 2 36
September 36 7 -1 42 8 34
October 34 8 0 42 6 36
November 36 5 -1 40 5 35
December 35 6 -3 38 5 33
3 Assistant 14 2 2 0
4 Driver 4 1 1 0
5 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
6 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
7 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
Month-wise Breakup
January 36 8 -1 43 7 36
February 36 5 -1 40 9 31
March 31 6 -1 36 7 29
April 29 11 -1 39 10 29
May 29 11 0 40 6 34
June 34 7 -1 40 8 32
July 32 7 0 39 6 33
August 33 4 -1 36 1 35
September 35 5 0 40 5 35
October 35 10 -1 44 8 36
November 36 5 0 41 5 36
December 36 3 -3 36 6 30
2 APS 15 2 1 1
3 Reader 14 1 1 0
4 Assistant (Ahlmad) 14 1 1 0
5 Driver 4 1 1 0
6 Naib Qasid 1 2 2 0
7 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
8 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
2 APS 16 2 1 1
3 Assistant 14 2 2 0
4 Driver 4 1 0 1
5 Naib Qasid 1 2 2 0
6 Chowkidar 1 1 0 1
7 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
3 Assistant 14 2 2 0
4 Driver 4 1 1 0
5 Naib Qasid 1 2 2 0
6 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
7 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
Month-wise Breakup
January 17 4 -1 20 8 12
February 12 9 0 21 6 15
March 15 11 -2 24 5 19
April 19 13 0 32 10 22
May 22 13 -2 33 14 19
June 19 8 0 27 6 21
July 21 12 7 40 2 38
August 38 3 1 42 0 42
September 42 6 0 48 1 47
October 47 2 0 49 2 47
November 47 3 3 53 8 45
December 45 8 0 53 3 50
Month-wise Breakup
January 78 15 -43 50 8 42
February 42 13 0 55 13 42
March 42 5 -2 45 20 25
April 25 11 -2 34 11 23
May 23 5 0 28 8 20
June 20 21 -1 40 14 26
July 26 5 -2 29 3 26
August 26 9 0 35 8 27
September 27 5 -1 31 5 26
October 26 8 -1 33 9 24
November 24 7 -1 30 6 24
December 24 8 -1 31 4 27
January 0 0 30 30 2 28
February 28 40 -2 66 12 54
March 54 8 0 62 15 47
April 47 10 -5 52 8 44
May 44 7 -1 50 13 37
June 37 8 -1 44 12 32
July 32 9 -2 39 10 29
August 29 1 0 30 2 28
September 28 6 0 34 4 30
October 30 12 0 42 7 35
November 35 7 0 42 6 36
December 36 6 -1 41 8 33
2 APS 15 2 1 1
3 Assistant 14 2 2 0
4 Driver 4 1 1 0
5 Naib Qasid 1 2 2 0
6 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
7 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
January 11 15 -2 24 17 7
February 7 7 0 14 7 7
March 7 20 -2 25 13 12
April 12 13 -1 24 14 10
May 10 22 -3 29 15 14
June 14 12 -1 25 14 11
July 11 16 -4 23 12 11
August 11 13 0 24 11 13
September 13 13 -1 25 11 14
October 14 10 -2 22 7 15
November 15 2 -1 16 3 13
December 13 3 -1 15 1 14
2 APS 16 2 1 1
3 Assistant 14 2 1 1
4 Driver 4 1 1 0
5 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
6 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
7 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
Month-wise Breakup
January 13 10 0 23 5 18
February 18 2 0 20 4 16
March 16 3 0 19 4 15
April 15 5 0 20 0 20
May 20 9 -3 26 14 12
June 12 5 0 17 4 13
July 13 6 -3 16 7 9
August 9 1 0 10 0 10
September 10 4 -1 13 3 10
October 10 4 0 14 4 10
November 10 5 0 15 3 12
December 12 3 0 15 4 11
2 APS 15 2 2 0
3 Assistant 14 2 2 0
4 Driver 4 1 0 1
5 Naib Qasid 1 2 2 0
6 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
7 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
Month-wise Breakup
January 30 6 0 36 6 30
February 30 12 -1 41 13 28
March 28 14 0 42 15 27
April 27 13 0 40 12 28
May 28 8 0 36 12 24
June 24 22 0 46 18 28
July 28 13 0 41 13 28
August 28 3 0 31 4 27
September 27 11 0 38 15 23
October 23 12 0 35 15 20
November 20 12 -2 30 11 19
December 19 13 0 32 15 17
3 Assistant 14 2 2 0
4 Driver 4 1 1 0
5 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
6 Naib Qasid 1 2 2 0
7 Sanitary Worker 1 1 1 0
Month-wise Breakup
January 88 0 0 88 1 87
February 87 0 0 87 2 85
March 85 0 -9 76 5 71
April 71 0 0 71 1 70
May 70 0 0 70 2 68
June 68 0 0 68 0 68
Total Annual Budget (2014-15): Rs. 26,562,000/- (All three ATC-Courts of Peshawar)
District of the Province to be presided by the District and Sessions Judge. A consumer to
redress the grievance may file a complaint before the Consumer Court. Any person
aggrieved by any final order of the Consumer Court may file an appeal in the Peshawar
High Court within thirty days of such order.
The Balochistan Consumers Protection Act was enforced in 2003 to protect and
promote rights and interests of the consumers. Under section 12 of the Act, the
Government of Balochistan shall establish as many Consumer Courts as necessary to
exercise jurisdiction under this Act and appoint a Judge for each of such Consumer
Courts or confer upon a Court of Judicial Magistrate to exercise the power of the
Consumer Court under this Act, in consultation with the High Court of Balochistan. A
consumer who has grievance may file a complaint before the Consumer Court. Any
person aggrieved by any final order of the Consumer Court may prefer an appeal to the
Sessions Court or the Balochistan High Court within period of thirty days of such order.
Consumer Court may require the claimant to deposit to the credit of the Consumer Court
such fees as may be specified, for payment to the laboratory for carrying out the necessary
analysis or test and the fee so deposited by the claimant shall be payable by the defendant if
the test or analysis support the version of the claimant.
The Consumer Court shall, if the claim relates to any services, forward a copy of such
claim to the defendant directing him to file his written statement within a period of
fifteen days or such extended period not exceeding fifteen days as may be granted by
the Consumer Court and on receipt of the written statement of the defendant, if any,
proceed to settle the dispute on the basis of evidence produced by both the parties. For
the purposes of this section, the Consumer Court shall have the same powers as are
vested in civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act XX of 1908). The
Consumer Court shall decide the claim within six months after the service of summons
on the respondent. Eleven Consumer Courts have been established in the Punjab in
Districts Lahore, Sahiwal, Multan, Dera Ghazi Khan, Rawalpindi, Gujrat, Sialkot,
Gujranwala, Bahawalpur, Sargodha and Faisalabad.
11 Consumer Courts have been established in the Punjab and 5 became functional in
the month of November 2014.
4000
3000
2000
3426
2973
1000
0
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
For the Islamabad Capital Territory, the Industrial Relations Act, 2012 was enacted to
consolidate and rationalize the law relating to formation of trade unions and
improvement of relations between employers and workmen in the Islamabad Capital
Territory and trance-provincial establishments and industries. Under section 53 of the
Act the Federal Government is empowered to constitute the National Industrial
Relations Commission (NIRC) consisting of not less than ten full time members including
the Chairman to adjudicate and determine industrial disputes in the Islamabad Capital
Territory and trans-provincial disputes to which a trade union or federation of such
trade union is party or the dispute is of national importance or referred to the NIRC by
the Federal Government.
In the Punjab, the Punjab Industrial Relations Act, 2010 was enacted to regulate
formation of trade unions and union activities, relations between employers and
workmen and the avoidance and settlement of any differences or disputes arising
between them and other ancillary matters. The Government of the Punjab may
establish as many Labour Courts as it considers necessary to exercise jurisdiction under
this Act. A Labour Court shall consist of one Presiding Officer appointed by the
Government, who shall not be qualified for appointment as Presiding Officer unless he
has been or is a District Judge or an Additional District Judge. Under section 47 of the
Act, the Government of Punjab may constitute as many Labour Appellate Tribunals
consisting of one member as it may consider necessary to exercise jurisdiction under
this Act. The member of the said Tribunal shall be a person who is or has been a Judge
or an Additional Judge of the Lahore High Court. Under section 46 of the Act, any
aggrieved party may, within thirty days of the communication of the final award,
decision or sentence passed by the Labour Court, prefer an appeal to the Labour
Appellate Tribunal.
In the province of Sindh, the Industrial Relations Act, 2008 (Act No. IV of 2008) was
revived with object to regulate formation of trade unions and union activities, relations
between employers and workmen and the avoidance and settlement of any differences
or disputes arising between them and other ancillary matters. The Government of Sindh
may establish as many Labour Courts as it considers necessary to exercise jurisdiction
under this Act. A Labour Court shall consist of one Presiding Officer appointed by the
Government of Sindh, who shall not be qualified for appointment as Presiding Officer
unless he has been or is a District Judge or an Additional District Judge. Under section 55
of the Act, the Government of Sindh may constitute as many Labour Appellate Tribunals
consisting of one member as it may consider necessary to exercise jurisdiction under
this Act. The member of the said Tribunal shall be a person who is or has been a Judge
or an Additional Judge of the Sindh High Court. Under section 54 of the Act, any
aggrieved party may, within thirty days of the communication of the final award,
decision or sentence passed by the Labour Court, prefer an appeal to the Labour
Appellate Tribunal.
consider necessary to exercise jurisdiction under this Act. The member of the said
Tribunal shall be a person who is or has been a Judge or an Additional Judge of the
Peshawar High Court. Under section 50 of the Act, any aggrieved party may, within
thirty days of the communication of the final award, decision or sentence passed by the
Labour Court, prefer an appeal to the Labour Appellate Tribunal.
In Balochistan, the Balochistan Industrial Relations Act, 2010 was enforced with aim the
to regulate formation of trade unions, regulation of relations between employers and
workmen and the avoidance and settlement of any differences or disputes arising
between them or matters connected therewith and ancillary thereto. Under section 52
of the Act, the Government of Balochistan may establish as many Labour Courts as it
considers necessary to exercise jurisdiction under this Act. A Labour Court shall consist
of one Presiding Officer appointed by the Government of Balochistan. A person shall
not be qualified for appointment as Presiding Officer unless he has been or is a District
Judge or an Additional District Judge provided that the Government of Balochistan may
in consultation with the High Court of Balochistan, appoint any person not so qualified
to be the Presiding Officer of a Labour Court. Under section 55 of the Act, the
Government of Balochistan may constitute as many Labour Appellate Tribunals
consisting of one member as it may consider necessary to exercise jurisdiction under
this Act. The member of the said Tribunal shall be a person who is qualified to be
appointed a Judge of High Court and shall be appointed in consultation with the High
Court of Balochistan. Any aggrieved party may, within thirty days of the communication
of the final award, decision or sentence passed by the Labour Court, prefer an appeal to
the Labour Appellate Tribunal.
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
14896
13367
6000
4000
2000
0
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500 3127
2851
1000
500
0
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
480
470
460
450
468
440
430
436
420
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
information from any office and issue summons for witnesses or documents. The
Tribunal finally decides a case within a period of six months from the date of initiation of
proceedings and if it fails to decide the case within six months then it shall conduct day
to day proceedings in the case till the final decision. The Tribunal executes its decisions
as if it is a Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
30
25
20
15
25
10
1
0
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
25
20
15
23
10
16
0
Institution during, 2014 Disposal during, 2014
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year