Chapter III

CHAPTER III
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
TABLE 3.1
AGE GROUP OF THE RESPONDENT
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent
21-3o years 36 29.8 30.0 30.0
31-40 years 51 42.1 42.5 72.5
Valid 41-50 years 11 9.1 9.2 81.7
50 & above 22 18.2 18.3 100.0
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that age of the respondents are 30% of the respondents
are between ( 21-30 ) yrs, 43 % of the respondents are between ( 31-40) yrs, 09% of the
respondents are above 50 years and 18% of the respondents are between (41-50 ) yrs
CHART 3.1
AGE GROUP OF THE RESPONDENT
TABLE 3.2
SEX OF THE REPESONDENT
Gender
Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative
Percent Percent
Male 63 52.1 52.5 52.5
Valid Female 57 47.1 47.5 100.0
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that that 53% of the respondents are male and 47% of
the respondents are female.
CHART 3.2
SEX OF THE REPESONDENT
TABLE 3.3
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENT
Educationalqualification
Percent Percent
SSLC 29 24.0 24.2 24.2
HSC 40 33.1 33.3 57.5
PG 10 8.3 8.3 65.8
Valid
Technical 15 12.4 12.5 78.3
Professional 26 21.5 21.7 100.0
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 24% of the respondents are professionally
qualified, 33% of the respondents have graduation, 08% of the respondents have post
graduation and 13 % of the respondents have technically qualified, 22% of the respondents
have only done finished SSLC.
CHART 3.3
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENT
TABLE 3.4
EXPERIENCE OF THE RESPONDENT
Experience
Percent Percent
< 5 yrs 53 43.8 44.2 44.2
5-15 yrs 39 32.2 32.5 76.7
Valid
15 yrs 28 23.1 23.3 100.0
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 44% of the respondents have < 5 years of
experience, 33% of the respondents have (5-15) yrs of experience and 23of the respondents
have their experience between (15) yr
CHART 3.4
EXPERIENCE OF THE RESPONDENT
TABLE 3.5
WHAT ARE THE BRANDS YOU ARE AWARE MOSTLY
brands
Percent Percent
Monarch 20 16.5 16.7 16.7
Vasavi 34 28.1 28.3 45.0
Vijaya 13 10.7 10.8 55.8
Valid Nalandha 19 15.7 15.8 71.7
Star 23 19.0 19.2 90.8
Nandi 11 9.1 9.2 100.0
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 17% of the respondents are mostly used in
monarch pipes , 28% of the respondents are mostly used in vasavi pipes , 11 % of the
respondents are mostly used in vijaya pipes , 15 % of the respondents are mostly used in
nalantha pipes , 19 % of the respondents are mostly used in star pipes , 09% of the
respondents are mostly used in nandhi pipes
CHART 3.5
WHAT ARE THE BRANDS YOU ARE AWARE MOSTLY
TABLE 3.6
ARE YOU AWARE OF TENSILE PRO PIPES?
pipes
Percent Percent
Yes 62 51.2 51.7 51.7
Valid No 58 47.9 48.3 100.0
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 52 % of the respondents are aware of tensile pro
pipes is yes , 48% of the respondents are aware of tensile pro pipes is no.
CHART 3.6
ARE YOU AWARE OF TENSILE PRO PIPES?
TABLE 3.7
HOW DID YOU GET TO KNOW ABOUT THE BRAND TENSILE PRO PIPES
tensile
Percent Percent
Print media 27 22.3 22.5 22.5
television 41 33.9 34.2 56.7
friends / 24 19.8 20.0 76.7
Valid
relatives
dealers 28 23.1 23.3 100.0
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 22 % of the respondents are know about the brand
tensile pro pipes is Print media, 34% of the respondents are know about the television, 20%
of the respondents are know about the friends / relatives , 23 % of the respondents are know
about the dealers.
CHART 3.7
HOW DID YOU GET TO KNOW ABOUT THE BRAND TENSILE PRO PIPES
TABLE .3.8
WHICH COMPANY PRODUCTS DO YOU PREFER TO USE
products
products
Percent Percent
Monarch 17 14.0 14.2 14.2
Vasavi 27 22.3 22.5 36.7
Vijaya 18 14.9 15.0 51.7
Valid Nalandha 22 18.2 18.3 70.0
Star 22 18.2 18.3 88.3
Nandi 14 11.6 11.7 100.0
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 14% of the respondents are says that company
products do you prefer to use monarch pipes , 23% of the respondents are mostly used in
vasavi pipes , 15% of the respondents are mostly used in vijaya pipes , 18% of the
respondents are mostly used in nalantha pipes , 18% of the respondents are mostly used in
star pipes , 12% of the respondents are mostly used in nandhi pipes
.
CHART .3.8
WHICH COMPANY PRODUCTS DO YOU PREFER TO USE
TABLE 3.9
TENSILE PRO PIPES IS BEST COMPANY IN A.P
company
Percent Percent
Strongly agree 23 19.0 19.2 19.2
Valid Agree 31 25.6 25.8 45.0
Not decide 23 19.0 19.2 64.2
Disagree 22 18.2 18.3 82.5
strongly 21 17.4 17.5 100.0
disagree
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 19% of the employee strongly agree with the
Tensile pro pipes is best company,26% of the respondent are said that agree,. 19% of the
respondent are said that not decide, 18% of the respondent are said that disagree, 18% of the
respondent are said that strongly disagree.
CHART 3.9
TENSILE PRO PIPES IS BEST COMPANY IN A.P
TABLE 3.10
I AM INSPIRED TO BUY THE TENSILE PRO PIPES BY
inspired
Percent Percent
Friends 27 22.3 22.5 22.5
Relatives 38 31.4 31.7 54.2
Neighbors 24 19.8 20.0 74.2
Valid
Advertisement 31 25.6 25.8 100.0
s
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 22% of the respondents are says that i am inspired
to buy the tensile pro pipes the friends , 32 % of the respondents are says that i am inspired
to buy the tensile pro pipes the through relative , 20 % of the respondents are says that i am
inspired to buy the tensile pro pipes the through Neighbors , 26% of the respondents are
says that i am inspired to buy the tensile pro pipes the through Advertisements.
CHART 3.10
I AM INSPIRED TO BUY THE TENSILE PRO PIPES BY
TABLE 3.11
ARE YOU A REGULAR CUSTOMER TO TENSILE PRO PIPES COMPANY OR
DEALERS?
customer
Percent Percent
Yes 64 52.9 53.3 53.3
Valid No 56 46.3 46.7 100.0
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 54 % of the respondents are regular customer to
tensile pro pipes Company says that yes, 46 % of the respondents are regular customer to
tensile pro pipes Company says that no.
CHART 3.11
ARE YOU A REGULAR CUSTOMER TO TENSILE PRO PIPES COMPANY OR
DEALERS?
TABLE 3.12
YOU ARE INTERESTED TO BUY THE PIPES FROM
interested
Percent Percent
Company 26 21.5 21.7 21.7
Dealers 35 28.9 29.2 50.8
Brokers 22 18.2 18.3 69.2
Valid
Friends 24 19.8 20.0 89.2
Showroom 13 10.7 10.8 100.0
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 22% of the respondents are said that you are
interested to buy the pipes from company, 29% of the respondents are said that you are
interested to buy the pipes from dealers, 18% of the respondents are said that you are
interested to buy the pipes from brokers, 20% of the respondents are said that you are
interested to buy the pipes from friends, 11% of the respondents are said that you are
interested to buy the pipes from shoe rooms.
CHART 3.12
YOU ARE INTERESTED TO BUY THE PIPES FROM
TABLE 3.13
TENSILE PRO PIPES COMPANY MAINLY CONCENTRATES ON
AGRICULTURAL SECTOR
agricultural
Percent Percent
Agree 34 28.1 28.3 49.2
Not decide 21 17.4 17.5 66.7
Valid Disagrees 22 18.2 18.3 85.0
Strongly 18 14.9 15.0 100.0
disagree
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 21% of the employee strongly agree mainly
concentrates on agricultural sector ,28% of the respondent are said that agree,. 18% of the
CHART 3.13
TENSILE PRO PIPES COMPANY MAINLY CONCENTRATES ON
AGRICULTURAL SECTOR
TABLE 3.14
WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM A PIPE COMPANY?
expect
Percent Percent
Valid Quality 30 24.8 25.0 25.0
weightless 35 28.9 29.2 54.2
length 26 21.5 21.7 75.8
colour 29 24.0 24.2 100.0
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 25% of the respondent are says that expect from a
pipe is quality of the product, 29% of the respondent are says that weightless of the product,
2 % of the respondent are says that length of the product, 24 % of the respondent are says
that color of the product.
CHART 3.14
WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM A PIPE COMPANY?
TABLE 3.15
ARE YOU THE CUSTOMER OF THE TENSILE PRO PIPES COMPANY?
propipes
Percent Percent
Yes 60 49.6 50.0 50.0
Valid No 60 49.6 50.0 100.0
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 50 % of the respondent are says that regular
customer in this company , 50 % of the respondent are says that no regular customer in this
company.
CHART 3.15
ARE YOU THE CUSTOMER OF THE TENSILE PRO PIPES COMPANY?
TABLE 3.16
I AM THE CUSTOMER OF THE TENSILE PRO PIPES COMPANY SINCE
since
Percent Percent
Less than 6 months 32 26.4 26.7 26.7
6 to 12 Months 37 30.6 30.8 57.5
Valid 1 to 2 years 22 18.2 18.3 75.8
More than 2 years 29 24.0 24.2 100.0
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 27% of the respondent are says that regular
customer in this company Less than 6 months , 32% of the respondent are says that regular
customer in this company 6 to 12 Months , 18% of the respondent are says that regular
customer in this company1 to 2 years , 24 % of the respondent are says that regular customer
in this company More than 2 years.
CHART 3.16
I AM THE CUSTOMER OF THE TENSILE PRO PIPES COMPANY SINCE
TABLE 3.17
I SHARE THE INFORMATION WITH MY FRIENDS AND RELATIVES
information
Percent Percent
Agree 32 26.4 26.7 54.2
Disagree 27 22.3 22.5 76.7
Valid
Strongly 28 23.1 23.3 100.0
disagree
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 28% of the employee strongly agree with the I
share the information with my friends and relatives ,27 % of the respondent are said that
agree,23% of the respondent are said that disagree, 23% of the respondent are said that
strongly disagree.
CHART 3.17
I SHARE THE INFORMATION WITH MY FRIENDS AND RELATIVES
TABLE 3.18
COMPANY CONCENTRATES ON RURAL MARKET MORE THAN URBAN
MARKET
market
Percent Percent
Agree 33 27.3 27.5 57.5
Disagree 25 20.7 20.8 78.3
Valid
Strongly 26 21.5 21.7 100.0
disagree
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 29 % of the employee strongly agree with the
Company concentrates on rural market more than urban market ,27% of the respondent are
said that agree,21% of the respondent are said that disagree, 22% of the respondent are said
that strongly disagree.
CHART 3.18
COMPANY CONCENTRATES ON RURAL MARKET MORE THAN URBAN
MARKET
TABLE 3.19
TENSILE PRO PIPES COMPANY PROVIDES BETTER SERVICES THAN OTHER
COMPANY
services
Percent Percent
Agree 40 33.1 33.3 57.5
Disagree 24 19.8 20.0 77.5
Valid
Strongly 27 22.3 22.5 100.0
disagree
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 24% of the employee strongly agree with the
provides better services than other company ,33% of the respondent are said that agree with
provides better services than other company ,20% of the respondent are said that disagree
with provides better services than other company , 23% of the respondent are said that
strongly disagree.
CHART 3.19
TENSILE PRO PIPES COMPANY PROVIDES BETTER SERVICES THAN OTHER
COMPANY
TABLE 3.20
I THINK TENSILE PRO PIPES COMPANY HAS HIGHEST MARKET SHARE IN
SOUTH INDIA
highest
Percent Percent
Valid Strongly agree 30 24.8 25.0 25.0
Agree 31 25.6 25.8 50.8
Not decide 21 17.4 17.5 68.3
Disagree 21 17.4 17.5 85.8
Strongly 17 14.0 14.2 100.0
disagree
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
. It is observed from the survey that 25% of the employee strongly agree with the has
highest market share in south India ,26% of the respondent are said that agree,. 18 % of the
CHART 3.20
I THINK TENSILE PRO PIPES COMPANY HAS HIGHEST MARKET SHARE IN
SOUTH INDIA
TABLE 3.21
DO YOU THINK TENSILE PRO PIPES PIPE USES CHEMICALS IN IT PROBLEM
WHICH WILL EFFECT DRINKING WATER
effect
Percent Percent
Agree 33 27.3 27.5 52.5
Not decide 24 19.8 20.0 72.5
Valid Disagree 17 14.0 14.2 86.7
Strongly 16 13.2 13.3 100.0
disagree
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 25 % of the employee strongly agree with the
chemicals in it problem which will effect drinking water, 27 % of the respondent are said that
agree,. 20 % of the respondent are said that not decide, 14 % of the respondent are said that
disagree, 13% of the respondent are said that strongly disagree.
CHART 3.21
DO YOU THINK TENSILE PRO PIPES PIPE USES CHEMICALS IN IT PROBLEM
WHICH WILL EFFECT DRINKING WATER
TABLE 3.22
YOU ARE USING THE PIPE FOR THE PURPOSE OF
purpose
Percent Percent
Drinking 33 27.3 27.5 27.5
water
Water flow 34 28.1 28.3 55.8
Valid
Power wiring 26 21.5 21.7 77.5
Others 27 22.3 22.5 100.0
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 28% of the respondent are says that You are using the
pipe for the purpose of Drinking water facilities , 28% of the respondent are says that using
the pipe for the purpose of Water flow facilities, 22% of the respondent are says that using
the pipe for the purpose of Power wiring facilities, 23% of the respondent are says that
using the pipe for the purpose of others..
CHART 3.22
YOU ARE USING THE PIPE FOR THE PURPOSE OF
TABLE 3.23
DO YOU HAVE THE SUPPLY CENTRE WITH IN 5 KM
supply
Percent Percent
Yes 53 43.8 44.2 44.2
Valid No 67 55.4 55.8 100.0
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 44% of the respondent are says that nearby the
supply center and 56% of the respondent are says that long in supply centre.
CHART 3.23
DO YOU HAVE THE SUPPLY CENTRE WITH IN 5 KM
TABLE 3.24
THE GOOD WORD OF MOUTH IS MORE IMPORTANT FOR COMPANY
mouth
Percent Percent
Agree 37 30.6 30.8 54.2
Not decide 21 17.4 17.5 71.7
Strongly 12 9.9 10.0 100.0
disagree
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 23% of the employee strongly agree with the word of
mouth is more important for company, 31% of the respondent are said that agree,. 18% of the
CHART 3.24
THE GOOD WORD OF MOUTH IS MORE IMPORTANT FOR COMPANY
TABLE 3.25
CAN THE COMPANY EXPECT YOU TO CREATE GOOD WORD OF MOUTH
create
Percent Percent
Yes 57 47.1 47.5 47.5
Valid No 63 52.1 52.5 100.0
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 47 % of the respondent are says that company expect you
to create good word of mouth yes and 53 % of the respondent are says that company expect
you to create good word of mouth no.
CHART 3.25
CAN THE COMPANY EXPECT YOU TO CREATE GOOD WORD OF MOUTH
TABLE 3.26
I THINK TENSILE PRO PIPES PIPE PRICES ARE LOW PRICE
price
Percent Percent
Agree 31 25.6 25.8 45.8
Not decide 24 19.8 20.0 65.8
Strongly 19 15.7 15.8 100.0
disagree
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 20% of the employee strongly agree with the think
tensile pro pipes pipe prices are low price , 27 % of the respondent are said that agree,. 19 %
of the respondent are said that not decide, 15% of the respondent are said that disagree, 19 %
of the respondent are said that strongly disagree.
CHART 3.26
I THINK TENSILE PRO PIPES PIPE PRICES ARE LOW PRICE
TABLE 3.27
DO YOU INVITE THE COMPANY TO PRODUCE OTHER AGRICULTURAL
PRODUCTS
invite
Percent Percent
Yes 56 46.3 46.7 46.7
Valid No 64 52.9 53.3 100.0
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 47% of the respondent are says that company to
produce other agricultural products is yes and 53% of the respondent are says that company
to produce other agricultural products is no.
CHART 3.27
DO YOU INVITE THE COMPANY TO PRODUCE OTHER AGRICULTURAL
PRODUCTS
TABLE 3.28
IF AGREED THE CREDIT FACILITY SHOULD BE AT LEAST TO
facility
Percent Percent
1week 35 28.9 29.2 29.2
Valid 2weeks 36 29.8 30.0 59.2
1month 24 19.8 20.0 79.2
2months 25 20.7 20.8 100.0
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 29% of the respondent are says that agreed the
credit facility should be at least to 1 week and 30 % of the respondent are says that agreed
the credit facility should be at least to 2 weeks , 20% of the respondent are says that agreed
the credit facility should be at least to 1 month and 21% of the respondent are says that
agreed the credit facility should be at least to 2 month.
CHART 3.28
IF AGREED THE CREDIT FACILITY SHOULD BE AT LEAST TO
TABLE 3.29
DO YOU EXPECT THE TENSILE PRO PIPES PIPE MARKET WILL SPREAD ALL
OVER INDIA?
spread
Percent Percent
Yes 58 47.9 48.3 48.3
Valid No 62 51.2 51.7 100.0
Total 120 99.2 100.0
Missing System 1 .8
Total 121 100.0
INTERPRETATION
It is observed from the survey that 48% of the respondent are says that agree with the
tensile pro pipes pipe market will spread all over India and 52% of the respondent are says
that disagree.
CHART 3.29
DO YOU EXPECT THE TENSILE PRO PIPES PIPE MARKET WILL SPREAD ALL
OVER INDIA?
CHI-SQUARE TEST
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Agegroup * 120 99.2% 1 0.8% 121 100.0%
Gender
Agegroup * Gender Crosstabulation
Count
Gender Total
Male Female
21-3o years 21 15 36
31-40 years 25 26 51
Agegroup
41-50 years 6 5 11
50 & above 11 11 22
Total 63 57 120
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .813a 3 .846
Likelihood Ratio .815 3 .846
Linear-by-Linear .267 1 .606
Association
N of Valid Cases 120
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is 5.23.
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx.
Sig.
Nominal by Contingency .082 .846
Nominal Coefficient
N of Valid Cases 120
CORRELATION METHOD
Descriptive Statistics
Mean Std. N
Deviation
Experience 1.7917 .79806 120
brands 3.2000 1.63779 120
Correlations
Experience brands
Pearson 1 .090
Correlation
Experience
Sig. (2-tailed) .328
N 120 120
Pearson .090 1
Correlation
brands
Sig. (2-tailed) .328
N 120 120
ONW WAY ANOVA
ANOVA
company
Sum of df Mean Square F Sig.
Squares
Between 13.975 5 2.795 1.492 .198
Groups
Within Groups 213.616 114 1.874
Total 227.592 119
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: company
(I) products (J) products Mean Std. Error Sig. 95% Confidence Interval
Difference (I- Lower Bound Upper Bound
J)
Vasavi -.05011 .42382 1.000 -1.2787 1.1785
Vijaya .20915 .46295 .998 -1.1329 1.5512
Monarch Nalandha .03743 .44204 1.000 -1.2439 1.3188
Star -.82620 .44204 .426 -2.1076 .4552
Nandi -.02101 .49403 1.000 -1.4531 1.4111
Monarch .05011 .42382 1.000 -1.1785 1.2787
Vijaya .25926 .41654 .989 -.9482 1.4667
Vasavi Nalandha .08754 .39316 1.000 -1.0521 1.2272
Star -.77609 .39316 .364 -1.9158 .3636
Nandi .02910 .45083 1.000 -1.2777 1.3359
Monarch -.20915 .46295 .998 -1.5512 1.1329
Tukey
Vasavi -.25926 .41654 .989 -1.4667 .9482
HSD
Vijaya Nalandha -.17172 .43506 .999 -1.4329 1.0894
Star -1.03535 .43506 .172 -2.2965 .2258
Nandi -.23016 .48780 .997 -1.6442 1.1839
Monarch -.03743 .44204 1.000 -1.3188 1.2439
Vasavi -.08754 .39316 1.000 -1.2272 1.0521
Nalandha Vijaya .17172 .43506 .999 -1.0894 1.4329
Star -.86364 .41273 .299 -2.0601 .3328
Nandi -.05844 .46799 1.000 -1.4151 1.2982
Monarch .82620 .44204 .426 -.4552 2.1076
Star Vasavi .77609 .39316 .364 -.3636 1.9158
Vijaya 1.03535 .43506 .172 -.2258 2.2965
Nalandha .86364 .41273 .299 -.3328 2.0601
Nandi .80519 .46799 .521 -.5514 2.1618
Monarch .02101 .49403 1.000 -1.4111 1.4531
Vasavi -.02910 .45083 1.000 -1.3359 1.2777
Nandi Vijaya .23016 .48780 .997 -1.1839 1.6442
Nalandha .05844 .46799 1.000 -1.2982 1.4151
Star -.80519 .46799 .521 -2.1618 .5514
Vasavi -.05011 .42382 .906 -.8897 .7895
Vijaya .20915 .46295 .652 -.7080 1.1263
Monarch Nalandha .03743 .44204 .933 -.8382 .9131
Star -.82620 .44204 .064 -1.7019 .0495
Nandi -.02101 .49403 .966 -.9997 .9577
Monarch .05011 .42382 .906 -.7895 .8897
Vijaya .25926 .41654 .535 -.5659 1.0844
Vasavi Nalandha .08754 .39316 .824 -.6913 .8664
Star -.77609 .39316 .051 -1.5549 .0028
Nandi .02910 .45083 .949 -.8640 .9222
Monarch -.20915 .46295 .652 -1.1263 .7080
LSD Vasavi -.25926 .41654 .535 -1.0844 .5659
Vijaya Nalandha -.17172 .43506 .694 -1.0336 .6901
Star -1.03535* .43506 .019 -1.8972 -.1735
Nandi -.23016 .48780 .638 -1.1965 .7362
Monarch -.03743 .44204 .933 -.9131 .8382
Vasavi -.08754 .39316 .824 -.8664 .6913
Nalandha Vijaya .17172 .43506 .694 -.6901 1.0336
Star -.86364* .41273 .039 -1.6813 -.0460
Nandi -.05844 .46799 .901 -.9855 .8687
Monarch .82620 .44204 .064 -.0495 1.7019
Star Vasavi .77609 .39316 .051 -.0028 1.5549
Vijaya 1.03535* .43506 .019 .1735 1.8972
Nalandha .86364* .41273 .039 .0460 1.6813
Nandi .80519 .46799 .088 -.1219 1.7323
Monarch .02101 .49403 .966 -.9577 .9997
Vasavi -.02910 .45083 .949 -.9222 .8640
Nandi Vijaya .23016 .48780 .638 -.7362 1.1965
Nalandha .05844 .46799 .901 -.8687 .9855
Star -.80519 .46799 .088 -1.7323 .1219
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
company
products N Subset for
alpha = 0.05
1
Vijaya 18 2.5556
Nalandha 22 2.7273
Monarch 17 2.7647
Tukey HSDa,b Nandi 14 2.7857
Vasavi 27 2.8148
Star 22 3.5909
Sig. .187
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are
displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 19.123.
b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic
mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels
are not guaranteed.
CHAPTER IV
FINDING, SUGESSTION AND CONCLUSION
FINDING:
 Most of the respondent is age of the respondents are 30% of the respondents are
between ( 21-30 ) yrs, 43 % of the respondents are between ( 31-40) yrs.
 Most of the respondent is that 53% of the respondents are male
 Most of the respondent is 24% of the respondents are professionally qualified, 33% of
the respondents have graduation
 Most of the respondent is 44% of the respondents have < 5 years of experience, 33%
of the respondents have (5-15) yrs of experience
 Most of the respondent is 17% of the respondents are mostly used in monarch pipes ,
28% of the respondents are mostly used in vasavi pipes
 Most of the respondent is 52 % of the respondents are aware of tensile pro pipes is
yes
 Most of the respondent is 22 % of the respondents are know about the brand tensile
pro pipes is Print media, 34% of the respondents are know about the television
 Most of the respondent is 14% of the respondents are says that company products do
you prefer to use monarch pipes , 23% of the respondents are mostly used in vasavi
pipes , 15% of the respondents are mostly used in vijaya pipes ,
 Most of the respondent is 19% of the employee strongly agree with the Tensile pro
pipes is best company,26% of the respondent are said that agree
 Most of the respondent is 22% of the respondents are says that i am inspired to buy
the tensile pro pipes the friends , 32 % of the respondents are says that i am inspired
to buy the tensile pro pipes the through relative ,
 Most of the respondent is 54 % of the respondents are regular customer to tensile pro
pipes Company says that yes
 Most of the respondent is 22% of the respondents are said that you are interested to
buy the pipes from company, 29% of the respondents are said that you are interested
to buy the pipes from dealers
 Most of the respondent is 21% of the employee strongly agree mainly concentrates on
agricultural sector ,28% of the respondent are said that agree
 Most of the respondent is 25% of the respondent are says that expect from a pipe is
quality of the product, 29% of the respondent are says that weightless of the product,
 Most of the respondent is 50 % of the respondent are says that regular customer in
this company
 Most of the respondent is 27% of the respondent are says that regular customer in this
company Less than 6 months , 32% of the respondent are says that regular customer
in this company 6 to 12 Months
 Most of the respondent is 28% of the employee strongly agree with the I share the
information with my friends and relatives ,27 % of the respondent are said that agree
 Most of the respondent is 29 % of the employee strongly agree with the Company
concentrates on rural market more than urban market ,27% of the respondent are said
that agree,
 Most of the respondent is 24% of the employee strongly agree with the provides
better services than other company ,33% of the respondent are said that agree with
provides better services than other company
 Most of the respondent is 25% of the employee strongly agree with the has highest
market share in south India ,26% of the respondent are said that agree
 Most of the respondent is 25 % of the employee strongly agree with the chemicals in
it problem which will effect drinking water, 27 % of the respondent are said that agree
 Most of the respondent is 28% of the respondent are says that You are using the pipe
for the purpose of Drinking water facilities , 28% of the respondent are says that
using the pipe for the purpose of Water flow facilities,
 Most of the respondent is 56% of the respondent are says that long in supply centre.
 Most of the respondent is 23% of the employee strongly agree with the word of mouth
is more important for company, 31% of the respondent are said that agree
 Most of the respondent is 53 % of the respondent are says that company expect you to
create good word of mouth no.
 Most of the respondent is 20% of the employee strongly agree with the think tensile
pro pipes pipe prices are low price , 27 % of the respondent are said that agree
 Most of the respondent is 53% of the respondent are says that company to produce
other agricultural products is no
 Most of the respondent is 29% of the respondent are says that agreed the credit
facility should be at least to 1 week and 30 % of the respondent are says that agreed
the credit facility should be at least to 2 weeks ,
 Most of the respondent is and 52% of the respondent are says that disagree.

Chapter III

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Chapter III

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

CHAPTER III

DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

ONW WAY ANOVA

Potrebbero piacerti anche