Tulare County Supervisors PRA - 3

MAIL
From: Damon.Nelson@mail.house.gov
Subject: Rep. Nunes on the San Joaquin River Settlement
Date: 23-Oct-2007 12:35
Attachments: TEXT.htm [Save] [Open]
San Joaquin River Settlement_Newsletter Update_Rep Nunes.pdf [Save] [Open]
Mime.822 (excluded from export)
Message Id: 471DEA79.VIS.PO5.200.20000C2.1.30A4.1
All,
The Congressman asked that I send you the attached document on the San
Joaquin River Settlement. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Damon
----------------------------------------
Damon Nelson
Deputy Chief of Staff & Legislative Director
Congressman Devin Nunes
1013 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
* (202) 225-2523
* (202) 225-3404 fax
* damon.nelson@mail.house.gov <mailto:damon.nelson@mail.house.gov>
* www.nunes.house.gov <http://www.nunes.house.gov/>
Newsletter signup: www.nunes.house.gov <http://www.nunes.house.gov/>
Office Mission: To ensure our constituents and all Americans live free
and prosperous lives in a healthy and safe environment by serving,
communicating, protecting and representing them in a professional and
caring manner.
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
All,
The Congressman asked that I send you the attached document on the San Joaquin River Settlement. Please let me know if you
have any questions.
Damon
----------------------------------------
Damon Nelson
( (202) 225-2523
2 (202) 225-3404 fax
* damon.nelson@mail.house.gov
8 www.nunes.house.gov
Newsletter signup: www.nunes.house.gov
Office Mission: To ensure our constituents and all Americans live free and prosperous lives in a healthy and safe environment by
serving, communicating, protecting and representing them in a professional and caring manner.
MAIL
Subject: Rep. Nunes' Statement on the San Joaquin River Settlement Mark-up
Date: 14-Nov-2007 19:00
oledata.mso [Save] [Open]
image001.png [Save] [Open]
image002.gif [Save] [Open]
Rep Nunes_Opening Statement for SJR Markup.pdf [Save] [Open]
Message Id: 473B45C7.VIS.PO5.200.2000006.1.4CF53.1
Statement for the Record
By the Honorable Devin Nunes
November 15, 2007
Committee on Natural Resources: The San Joaquin River Restoration

Settlement Act (H.R. 4074)
Let me begin by thanking the Chairman and Ranking Member for keeping
their promise to proceed with this legislation, and the underlying
issue, under regular order. Although a subcommittee markup was skipped,
I certainly have confidence that the Chairman will bring this bill to
the House floor as a stand alone bill so that I, and other colleagues,
have an opportunity to participate in the legislative process.
Since my first election to public office, I have never heard a single

constituent say that we need less water in California. However,
throughout the recent debate over the San Joaquin River Settlement,
certain interests have made clear their views that less water in the
valley is not only acceptable but desirable.
It should be alarming to all of us that radical environmentalists are

gaining increasing control over our lives and in this case, our water
supplies. They were successful in leveraging an activist judge in their
effort to extort water out of communities in the San Joaquin Valley.
However, their plan requires our acceptance and Congress can, and
should, insist that people are protected in this deal. The rush to pass
a deal at all costs must not govern public policy and the expediency of
a settlement must not over-ride good judgment.
I hope you will all read the settlement and its implementing legislation
very carefully. Please note the careful attention to river restoration
made in its text and contrast that worthy priority with the provisions
dealing with the consequences of lost water. These water diversions,
absent mitigation, represent an attack on the very foundation of the
economy in my district and more importantly threaten the water supply of
many rural communities. Make no mistake, in its current form, this bill
represents a highly twisted view of the world - a view that fish are
more important than people. This view must not be permitted to leave
this committee unchallenged.
As the elected representative of nearly 700,000 constituents, I made a

commitment that I would do my best to achieve passage of a San Joaquin
River Settlement agreement in Congress. Despite efforts to misrepresent
my position, I have never opposed a settlement of this dispute. In my
view, as long as the agreement is fair to the people who live and farm
in our valley, it should be given a chance to work. Unfortunately, this
is not the case and the legislation before you is neither fair nor is it
good public policy.
Nevertheless, as part of my effort to determine whether or not

negotiators have crafted a deal that protects all of our interests, I
have asked a lot of hard questions. This has frustrated those who
expected the fanfare of a settlement to be followed by a rubber stamp in
Congress. What I have discovered during this process is that in an
effort to rush a deal through Congress, some of the settling parties
have consistently misrepresented facts concerning their deal to farmers
and the general public.
Today, we see a bill, mandated by the courts and special interests,

which authorizes the largest and most expensive river restoration
project in history with no expectation of ever recovering a single drop
of the lost water.
The parties to the settlement have come to Congress and asked us to

"trust" them - and have told us that they have the best interest of the
Valley in mind. Again, while their thoughts may be genuine, "trust" and
"faith" do not hold any weight in the court of law or in the court of
public opinion. You do not have to be a skeptic to be suspicious when
someone tells you that they have a plan to deal with a problem, but will
not put it in writing, or in this case in their legislation. I operate
on the basic tenant that if it is not codified in law, then it does not
exist.
Therefore, knowing that we will not recover water diverted for river
restoration, it is important to understand the likely consequences.
With surface supplies already overprescribed, this means increased
ground water pumping. Indeed, local communities throughout our region
have testified that, absent changes to the settlement, serious problems
lie ahead for the residents of valley communities. City and county
officials have objected to the settlement legislation because it fails
to address substantial regional ground water supply challenges that will
be aggravated by the settlement. Furthermore, many other organizations
have stepped forward to express their concerns including farm bureaus,
county supervisors, chambers of commerce, and other community groups.
In fact, just in the past two weeks, four irrigation districts within
Friant have expressed strong objections to the current draft citing
problems with the funding mechanism and the new contract language.
In August of 2006, the Friant Board of Directors voted unanimously to
approve their participation in this settlement. Since then, many events
have occurred that have fundamentally changed the deal. Now, their own
irrigation districts are stepping forward to express their doubts. Yet,
to this day, the Friant Board of Directors have refused to take another
public vote to reaffirm their commitment to this settlement. Today,
Friant is having to cloak its position in the terms of "supporting the
concept" of the bill. As legislators, we do not have the luxury of
being able to vote on the "concept" of legislation - you either support
it or you do not - it is that simple.
With all of the evidence suggesting that the settlement does not meet
the smell test and an unwillingness on the part of settling parties to
put their water management plans in legislation, it is important for us
to make our voices heard.
I have always had faith in my colleagues that congressional courtesy

would be provided to a member to represent his or her district in a
manner he or she sees fit. Unfortunately, that is not the case today
and many members of this committee have decided to toss congressional
courtesy to the curb and proceed forward with bad public policy forced
on my congressional district over my strong objections.
We are at a crossroads and the economic and social future of my

constituents is at stake. We must have mitigation for the lost water;
we must have mitigation for groundwater impacts; and we must have a
safety net for my constituents in case the settling parties fail to live
up to their grand promises.
----------------------------------------
Damon Nelson
* (202) 225-2523
* (202) 225-3404 fax
* www.nunes.house.gov <http://www.nunes.house.gov/>
Newsletter signup: www.nunes.house.gov <http://www.nunes.house.gov/>
caring manner.
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Statement for the Record

By the Honorable Devin Nunes
November 15, 2007
Committee on Natural Resources: The San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement Act (H.R. 4074)
Let me begin by thanking the Chairman and Ranking Member for keeping their promise to proceed with this
legislation, and the underlying issue, under regular order. Although a subcommittee markup was skipped, I
certainly have confidence that the Chairman will bring this bill to the House floor as a stand alone bill so that
I, and other colleagues, have an opportunity to participate in the legislative process.
Since my first election to public office, I have never heard a single constituent say that we need less water in
California. However, throughout the recent debate over the San Joaquin River Settlement, certain interests
have made clear their views that less water in the valley is not only acceptable but desirable.
It should be alarming to all of us that radical environmentalists are gaining increasing control over our lives
and in this case, our water supplies. They were successful in leveraging an activist judge in their effort to
extort water out of communities in the San Joaquin Valley. However, their plan requires our acceptance and
Congress can, and should, insist that people are protected in this deal. The rush to pass a deal at all costs
must not govern public policy and the expediency of a settlement must not over-ride good judgment.
I hope you will all read the settlement and its implementing legislation very carefully. Please note the
careful attention to river restoration made in its text and contrast that worthy priority with the provisions
dealing with the consequences of lost water. These water diversions, absent mitigation, represent an attack
on the very foundation of the economy in my district and more importantly threaten the water supply of
many rural communities. Make no mistake, in its current form, this bill represents a highly twisted view of
the world – a view that fish are more important than people. This view must not be permitted to leave this
committee unchallenged.
As the elected representative of nearly 700,000 constituents, I made a commitment that I would do my best
to achieve passage of a San Joaquin River Settlement agreement in Congress. Despite efforts to
misrepresent my position, I have never opposed a settlement of this dispute. In my view, as long as the
agreement is fair to the people who live and farm in our valley, it should be given a chance to
work. Unfortunately, this is not the case and the legislation before you is neither fair nor is it good public
policy.
Nevertheless, as part of my effort to determine whether or not negotiators have crafted a deal that protects all
of our interests, I have asked a lot of hard questions. This has frustrated those who expected the fanfare of a
settlement to be followed by a rubber stamp in Congress. What I have discovered during this process is that
in an effort to rush a deal through Congress, some of the settling parties have consistently misrepresented
facts concerning their deal to farmers and the general public.
Today, we see a bill, mandated by the courts and special interests, which authorizes the largest and most
expensive river restoration project in history with no expectation of ever recovering a single drop of the lost
water.
The parties to the settlement have come to Congress and asked us to “trust” them - and have told us that they
have the best interest of the Valley in mind. Again, while their thoughts may be genuine, “trust” and “faith”
do not hold any weight in the court of law or in the court of public opinion. You do not have to be a skeptic
to be suspicious when someone tells you that they have a plan to deal with a problem, but will not put it in
writing, or in this case in their legislation. I operate on the basic tenant that if it is not codified in law, then it
does not exist.
Therefore, knowing that we will not recover water diverted for river restoration, it is important to understand
the likely consequences. With surface supplies already overprescribed, this means increased ground water
pumping. Indeed, local communities throughout our region have testified that, absent changes to the
settlement, serious problems lie ahead for the residents of valley communities. City and county officials
have objected to the settlement legislation because it fails to address substantial regional ground water
supply challenges that will be aggravated by the settlement. Furthermore, many other organizations have
stepped forward to express their concerns including farm bureaus, county supervisors, chambers of
commerce, and other community groups. In fact, just in the past two weeks, four irrigation districts within
Friant have expressed strong objections to the current draft citing problems with the funding mechanism and
the new contract language.
In August of 2006, the Friant Board of Directors voted unanimously to approve their participation in this
settlement. Since then, many events have occurred that have fundamentally changed the deal. Now, their
own irrigation districts are stepping forward to express their doubts. Yet, to this day, the Friant Board of
Directors have refused to take another public vote to reaffirm their commitment to this settlement. Today,
Friant is having to cloak its position in the terms of “supporting the concept” of the bill. As legislators, we
do not have the luxury of being able to vote on the “concept” of legislation - you either support it or you do
not – it is that simple.
With all of the evidence suggesting that the settlement does not meet the smell test and an unwillingness on
the part of settling parties to put their water management plans in legislation, it is important for us to make
our voices heard.
I have always had faith in my colleagues that congressional courtesy would be provided to a member to
represent his or her district in a manner he or she sees fit. Unfortunately, that is not the case today and many
members of this committee have decided to toss congressional courtesy to the curb and proceed forward with
bad public policy forced on my congressional district over my strong objections.
We are at a crossroads and the economic and social future of my constituents is at stake. We must have
mitigation for the lost water; we must have mitigation for groundwater impacts; and we must have a safety
net for my constituents in case the settling parties fail to live up to their grand promises.
----------------------------------------
Damon Nelson
( (202) 225-2523
2 (202) 225-3404 fax
Newsletter signup: www.nunes.house.gov
Office Mission: To ensure our constituents and all Americans live free and prosperous lives in a healthy and safe environment by
serving, communicating, protecting and representing them in a professional and caring manner.
MAIL
From: devin@devinnunes.net
Subject: Ag Industry Round up May 27th...
Date: 22-May-2008 16:36
Invitation Complimentary.pdf [Save] [Open]
Message Id: 4835A0F6.VIS.PO5.200.200001B.1.A0BC.1
Please join me and a Special Guest
for the Ag Industry Round-up Reception
Tuesday
May 27, 2008
6:00 to 8:00 P.M.
At the Home of
Scot and Sue Ann Hillman
2433 E. Oakdale Ave.
Tulare, CA 93274
Please see the attachment for more information.

Devin Nunes
Member of Congress
Phone (559) 739-8903
Fax (559) 739-8994
www.DevinNunes.net <http://www.devinnunes.net/>
PO Box 6545
Visalia, CA 93290
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Please join me and a Special Guest

for the Ag Industry Round-up Reception
Tuesday
May 27, 2008
6:00 to 8:00 P.M.
At the Home of
2433 E. Oakdale Ave.
Tulare, CA 93274
Please see the attachment for more information.
Devin Nunes
Member of Congress
Phone (559) 739-8903
Fax (559) 739-8994
www.DevinNunes.net
PO Box 6545
Visalia, CA 93290
MAIL
From: Tal.Eslick@mail.house.gov
To: Steven Worthley
Subject: Tal Eslick- Congressman Devin Nunes
Date: 21-Nov-2008 13:03
Message Id: 4926B195.VIS.PO4.200.200007B.1.17477.1
Supervisor Worthley,
I must have missed you at the office. I hope you're getting an early start on the weekend.
I have worked for Congressman Nunes in Fresno County for three years. In the coming months I'll be doing a lot of work
in Tulare County as well.
I wanted to introduce myself and make sure you have my contact information.
Please let me know if there is any way I can be helpful in the future.
Thanks,
-------------------------------------
Tal Eslick
Field Director
Office of Congressman Devin Nunes
264 Clovis Ave. Suite 206
Clovis, CA 93612
Tel: (559) 731-1694
Fax: (559) 323-5528
www.nunes.house.gov
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Supervisor Worthley,
I must have missed you at the office. I hope you're getting an early start on the weekend.
I have worked for Congressman Nunes in Fresno County for three years. In the coming months I'll be doing
a lot of work in Tulare County as well.
I wanted to introduce myself and make sure you have my contact information.
Please let me know if there is any way I can be helpful in the future.
Thanks,
-------------------------------------
Tal Eslick
Field Director
264 Clovis Ave. Suite 206
Clovis, CA 93612
Tel: (559) 731-1694
Fax: (559) 323-5528
www.nunes.house.gov
MAIL
From: PVanderpoel@co.tulare.ca.us
To: Melissa Mederos
Subject: Re: State Route 99 Mtg w/ Congressmen Nunes & Costa
Date: 09-Feb-2009 11:54
Message Id: 49901971.VIS.PO4.200.2000080.1.430A9.1
Hi Melissa,
Hope all is well. I put this on my calendar. Thanks for your help.
Pete Vander Poel

Tulare County
Supervisor District 2
2800 W. Burrel
Visalia, CA 93291
(559) 636-5000
(559) 733-6898 Fax
>>> "Mederos, Melissa" <melissa.mederos@mail.house.gov> 2/3/2009 3:58 PM >>>
Please see the attached invitation. A paper copy will follow in the mail this week.
Feel free to respond with any questions or to RSVP. Thank you.
Melissa Mederos
Executive Assistant
Congressman Devin Nunes (CA-21)
113 N. Church St., Suite 208
Visalia, CA 93291
Ph: (559) 733-3861
Fax: (559) 733-3865
Melissa.Mederos@mail.house.gov
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Hi Melissa,
Hope all is well. I put this on my calendar. Thanks for your help.
Pete Vander Poel

Tulare County
Supervisor District 2
2800 W. Burrel
Visalia, CA 93291
(559) 636-5000
(559) 733-6898 Fax
>>> "Mederos, Melissa" <melissa.mederos@mail.house.gov> 2/3/2009 3:58 PM >>>
Please see the attached invitation. A paper copy will follow in the mail this week.
Feel free to respond with any questions or to RSVP. Thank you.
Melissa Mederos
Executive Assistant
Visalia, CA 93291
Ph: (559) 733-3861
Fax: (559) 733-3865
Melissa.Mederos@mail.house.gov
MAIL
To: Steven Worthley, Alshida@co.tulare.ca.us, Ted Smalley
Subject: FW: Rep. Nunes calls on Obama AGAIN to turn on pumps....
Date: 26-Feb-2009 11:15
Ltr to Obama on Pumps and Stimulus Feb 2009 #2.pdf [Save] [Open]
Message Id: 49A679D9.VIS.PO4.200.2000030.1.24794.1
Can you forward this around? Thanks
From: Nelson, Damon

Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:57 PM
Subject: Rep. Nunes calls on Obama AGAIN to turn on pumps....
February 26, 2009
The Honorable Barack Obama
President of the United States
1600 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Dear President Obama:
It has been three weeks since my last correspondence (attached) and the
economic catastrophe caused by water supply shortages in the State of
California has only gotten worse. We have now seen your stimulus
package enacted and the omnibus appropriations bill pass the House.
Yet, despite my urging, neither of them contained a "zero cost"
provision that would save 80,000 jobs in the San Joaquin Valley.
A simple measure that would save up to 80,000 jobs would be to relax

restrictions on pumping facilities in the Sacramento - San Joaquin
Rivers Delta that have caused the regulatory drought that my
constituents are experiencing. (Presently those restrictions are
resulting in a loss of nearly 8,000 acre-feet per day.) By eliminating
those restrictions you would enable family farmers to cultivate nearly
500,000 acres of land that otherwise will have to be fallowed because of
a lack of water. The economic loss of fallowing this ground will reach
$2.2 billion dollars. Ironically, this is close to the same amount of
money that my constituents are being asked to provide the Federal
government as their share of the nearly one trillion dollar stimulus
package.
Your administration requested a list of "shovel ready" projects that can

break ground within 180 days. Below is a list of such projects that
total $261 million. Considering my constituents were asked to pay
nearly $2 billion to fund your economic stimulus package, I would hope
that you are able to find a way to invest a small portion of their funds
back into the local community.
* $3 million for the completion of State Route 180 from

Temperance to Academy in Fresno, California;
* $2.5 million for Friant Road Reconstruction (SR 41 - Shepherd)

in Fresno, California;
* $5 million for Manning Avenue Rehabilitation in Reedley,

California;
* $4.2 million for Dinuba Avenue Rehabilitation in Reedley,

California;
* $170 million for State Route 99 expansion between the cities
of Goshen and Tulare, California;
* $7 million for Betty Drive Widening in Tulare County,

California;
* $14 million for Ben Maddox Bridge Widening in Visalia,

California;
* $48 million for Road 80 expansion in Tulare County,

California;
* $7.2 million for Road 192 expansion in Tulare County,

California;
I remain convinced that you can achieve a "zero cost" immediate relief
by restoring delta pumping to historic levels. But in the meantime, I
stand ready to work with you on these projects.
Best regards,
Devin Nunes
Member of Congress
CC: Speaker Nancy Pelosi; Interior Secretary Ken Salazar; Governor

Arnold Schwarzenegger; Senator Dianne Feinstein; Senator Barbara Boxer;
California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman;
----------------------------------------
Damon Nelson
( (202) 225-2523
2 (202) 225-3404 fax
8 www.nunes.house.gov <http://www.nunes.house.gov/>
caring manner.
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Can you forward this around? Thanks
From: Nelson, Damon

Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:57 PM
Subject: Rep. Nunes calls on Obama AGAIN to turn on pumps....
February 26, 2009
The Honorable Barack Obama
President of the United States
1600 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

It has been three weeks since my last correspondence (attached) and the economic catastrophe caused
by water supply shortages in the State of California has only gotten worse. We have now seen your stimulus
package enacted and the omnibus appropriations bill pass the House. Yet, despite my urging, neither of
them contained a “zero cost” provision that would save 80,000 jobs in the San Joaquin Valley.
A simple measure that would save up to 80,000 jobs would be to relax restrictions on pumping
facilities in the Sacramento – San Joaquin Rivers Delta that have caused the regulatory drought that my
constituents are experiencing. (Presently those restrictions are resulting in a loss of nearly 8,000 acre-feet
per day.) By eliminating those restrictions you would enable family farmers to cultivate nearly 500,000
acres of land that otherwise will have to be fallowed because of a lack of water. The economic loss of
fallowing this ground will reach $2.2 billion dollars. Ironically, this is close to the same amount of money
that my constituents are being asked to provide the Federal government as their share of the nearly one
trillion dollar stimulus package.
Your administration requested a list of “shovel ready” projects that can break ground within 180
days. Below is a list of such projects that total $261 million. Considering my constituents were asked to pay
nearly $2 billion to fund your economic stimulus package, I would hope that you are able to find a way to
invest a small portion of their funds back into the local community.
• $3 million for the completion of State Route 180 from Temperance to Academy in Fresno,
California;
• $2.5 million for Friant Road Reconstruction (SR 41 – Shepherd) in Fresno, California;
• $5 million for Manning Avenue Rehabilitation in Reedley, California;
• $4.2 million for Dinuba Avenue Rehabilitation in Reedley, California;
• $170 million for State Route 99 expansion between the cities of Goshen and Tulare, California;
• $7 million for Betty Drive Widening in Tulare County, California;
• $14 million for Ben Maddox Bridge Widening in Visalia, California;
• $48 million for Road 80 expansion in Tulare County, California;
• $7.2 million for Road 192 expansion in Tulare County, California;
I remain convinced that you can achieve a “zero cost” immediate relief by restoring delta pumping to
historic levels. But in the meantime, I stand ready to work with you on these projects.
Best regards,
Devin Nunes
Member of Congress
CC: Speaker Nancy Pelosi; Interior Secretary Ken Salazar; Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger; Senator
Dianne Feinstein; Senator Barbara Boxer; California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman;
----------------------------------------
Damon Nelson
( (202) 225-2523
2 (202) 225-3404 fax
Office Mission: To ensure our constituents and all Americans live free and prosperous lives in a healthy and safe
environment by serving, communicating, protecting and representing them in a professional and caring manner.
MAIL
From: Rep.Nunes@MAIL.HOUSE.GOV
To: NEWSLETTER-CA21@LS1.HOUSE.GOV
Subject: responsible investments, overdue action: will the President and Congressional leaders help us?
Date: 26-Feb-2009 12:32
headers.822 [Save] [Open]
image001.jpg [Save] [Open]
Message Id: 49A68BD1.VIS.PO4.200.2000078.1.2F7F8.1
Dear Friends,
As you know, we are facing tough times in California. Our challenges are
even worse in the San Joaquin Valley.
Despite passage of two massive bills, which authorize nearly $2 trillion

in spending, San Joaquin Valley residents continue to witness a growing
crisis. In Congress, our families and communities seem to have become
an afterthought. Meanwhile, two-inch minnows in the Bay Delta and an
extinct Salmon run in the San Joaquin River are made top priority.
Clearly the status quo is unacceptable. Today, I sent another letter to

the President
<http://nunes.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=b05
9089d-39e1-4d5f-b267-87826b58ec2c> . My latest letter is intended to
remind our nation's leaders of the disaster we face. It also outlines
responsible investments that could be made through the direction of
funding to infrastructure projects in our communities.
Thank you for your interest in this important issue.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
Note: This email account is unattended and is used for outbound

communication only. I value your comments and encourage you to visit my
website at www.nunes.house.gov <http://www.nunes.house.gov/> if you
would like to send me a message or to learn more about my work in
Congress.
It has been three weeks since my last correspondence (attached) and the
economic catastrophe caused by water supply shortages in the State of
California has only gotten worse. We have now seen your stimulus
package enacted and the omnibus appropriations bill pass the House.
Yet, despite my urging, neither of them contained a "zero cost"
provision that would save 80,000 jobs in the San Joaquin Valley.
A simple measure that would save up to 80,000 jobs would be to relax

restrictions on pumping facilities in the Sacramento - San Joaquin
Rivers Delta that have caused the regulatory drought that my
constituents are experiencing. (Presently those restrictions are
resulting in a loss of nearly 8,000 acre-feet per day.) By eliminating
those restrictions you would enable family farmers to cultivate nearly
500,000 acres of land that otherwise will have to be fallowed because of
a lack of water. The economic loss of fallowing this ground will reach
$2.2 billion dollars. Ironically, this is close to the same amount of
money that my constituents are being asked to provide the Federal
government as their share of the nearly one trillion dollar stimulus
package.
Your administration requested a list of "shovel ready" projects that can

break ground within 180 days. Below is a list of such projects that
total $261 million. Considering my constituents were asked to pay
nearly $2 billion to fund your economic stimulus package, I would hope
that you are able to find a way to invest a small portion of their funds
back into the local community.
* $3 million for the completion of State Route 180 from Temperance

to Academy in Fresno, California;
* $2.5 million for Friant Road Reconstruction (SR 41 - Shepherd)
in Fresno, California;
* $5 million for Manning Avenue Rehabilitation in Reedley,

California;
* $4.2 million for Dinuba Avenue Rehabilitation in Reedley,

California;
* $170 million for State Route 99 expansion between the cities of

Goshen and Tulare, California;
* $7 million for Betty Drive Widening in Tulare County,

California;
* $14 million for Ben Maddox Bridge Widening in Visalia,

California;
* $48 million for Road 80 expansion in Tulare County, California;
* $7.2 million for Road 192 expansion in Tulare County,

California;
I remain convinced that you can achieve a "zero cost" immediate relief
by restoring delta pumping to historic levels. But in the meantime, I
stand ready to work with you on these projects.
Best regards,
Devin Nunes
Member of Congress
CC: Speaker Nancy Pelosi; Interior Secretary Ken Salazar; Governor

Arnold Schwarzenegger; Senator Dianne Feinstein; Senator Barbara Boxer;
California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman;
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
As you know, we are facing tough times in California. Our challenges are even worse in the San Joaquin
Valley.
Despite passage of two massive bills, which authorize nearly $2 trillion in spending, San Joaquin Valley
residents continue to witness a growing crisis. In Congress, our families and communities seem to have
become an afterthought. Meanwhile, two-inch minnows in the Bay Delta and an extinct Salmon run in the
San Joaquin River are made top priority.
Clearly the status quo is unacceptable. Today, I sent another letter to the President. My latest letter is
intended to remind our nation’s leaders of the disaster we face. It also outlines responsible investments that
could be made through the direction of funding to infrastructure projects in our communities.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
Note: This email account is unattended and is used for outbound communication only. I value your comments and encourage you
to visit my website at www.nunes.house.gov if you would like to send me a message or to learn more about my work in Congress.
It has been three weeks since my last correspondence (attached) and the economic catastrophe caused by
water supply shortages in the State of California has only gotten worse. We have now seen your stimulus
package enacted and the omnibus appropriations bill pass the House. Yet, despite my urging, neither of
them contained a “zero cost” provision that would save 80,000 jobs in the San Joaquin Valley.
A simple measure that would save up to 80,000 jobs would be to relax restrictions on pumping facilities in
the Sacramento – San Joaquin Rivers Delta that have caused the regulatory drought that my constituents are
experiencing. (Presently those restrictions are resulting in a loss of nearly 8,000 acre-feet per day.) By
eliminating those restrictions you would enable family farmers to cultivate nearly 500,000 acres of land that
otherwise will have to be fallowed because of a lack of water. The economic loss of fallowing this ground
will reach $2.2 billion dollars. Ironically, this is close to the same amount of money that my constituents are
being asked to provide the Federal government as their share of the nearly one trillion dollar stimulus
package.
Your administration requested a list of “shovel ready” projects that can break ground within 180
days. Below is a list of such projects that total $261 million. Considering my constituents were asked to pay
nearly $2 billion to fund your economic stimulus package, I would hope that you are able to find a way to
invest a small portion of their funds back into the local community.
• $3 million for the completion of State Route 180 from Temperance to Academy in Fresno, California;
• $2.5 million for Friant Road Reconstruction (SR 41 – Shepherd) in Fresno, California;
• $5 million for Manning Avenue Rehabilitation in Reedley, California;
• $4.2 million for Dinuba Avenue Rehabilitation in Reedley, California;
• $170 million for State Route 99 expansion between the cities of Goshen and Tulare, California;
• $7 million for Betty Drive Widening in Tulare County, California;
• $14 million for Ben Maddox Bridge Widening in Visalia, California;
• $48 million for Road 80 expansion in Tulare County, California;
• $7.2 million for Road 192 expansion in Tulare County, California;
I remain convinced that you can achieve a “zero cost” immediate relief by restoring delta pumping to historic
levels. But in the meantime, I stand ready to work with you on these projects.
Best regards,
Devin Nunes
Member of Congress
CC: Speaker Nancy Pelosi; Interior Secretary Ken Salazar; Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger; Senator
Dianne Feinstein; Senator Barbara Boxer; California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman;
MAIL
From: JRousseau@co.tulare.ca.us
To: Steven Worthley, Pete Vander Poel, Phil Cox, Mike Ennis, Allen Ishida
Subject: Fwd: RE: Conference Room
Date: 09-Mar-2009 10:56
Message Id: 49B4F5CF.VIS.PO4.200.200003A.1.20DE3.1
FYI - We will probably want to attend this meeting.
Take care,
Jean
>>> On 3/9/2009 at 10:48 AM, in message < 49B4F3E0.6B7C.00AB.1@co.tulare.ca.us >, Gary Kunkel wrote:
Just an FYI from Devin Nunes' office.
________________________________________________________________________
_______________
As you know California is on the verge of disaster. The economy of the

state is dependent on the ability to move water from the northern
reaches of the state to the south. The pipelines that complete this are
known as the Central Valley Project and the State Water Project. This
movement of water serves more than three million acres of farmland and
over 25 million people. An absence of political leadership has caused a
lack of investment in the infrastructure required to make these Projects
capable of continuing service to the state.
Furthermore, extreme environmental regulations have subjected the
Projects to severe operational restrictions under the Endangered Species
Act. As a consequence, we are facing catastrophic water supply
shortages - literally a regulatory drought.
In lieu of my annual Central Valley Ag Tour, I am holding a Water

Seminar on March 27th to address this crisis. This seminar will discuss
what we can expect from the water crisis, solutions, and strategies for
survival.
I do not believe I am exaggerating when I state that the people in the

San Joaquin Valley are facing a humanitarian crisis unparalleled in
modern history. Unemployment figures could reach staggering levels. I
urge you to join me on the 27th so we can better understand the looming
crisis and for the sake of valley residents, develop some solutions.
Solutions that I believe can only be achieved through the cooperation of
governments, elected officials, private enterprise, etc.
Friday, March 27, 2009

10:00 a.m. to Noon
Tulare County Ag Commissioner's Office
4437 S. Laspina St. Tulare, CA 93274
Please RSVP by contacting my Visalia office (559-733-3861 or

Nicky.Henderson@mail.house.gov ). I hope to see you on March 27th.
________________________________________________________________________
______
Nicky Henderson
Special Projects Director
113 N Church Street, Suite 208
Visalia, CA 93291
559.972.1915 Cell
559.733.3861 Office
559.733.3865 Fax
Nicky.Henderson@Mail.House.Gov
Gary W Kunkel
Agricultural Commissioner/Sealer
County of Tulare
4437 S Laspina St
Tulare, CA 93274
Voice: (559) 685-3323 Ext. 209
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
FYI - We will probably want to attend this meeting.
Take care,
Jean
>>> On 3/9/2009 at 10:48 AM, in message <49B4F3E0.6B7C.00AB.1@co.tulare.ca.us>, Gary Kunkel wrote:

Just an FYI from Devin Nunes' office.
________________________________________________________________________
_______________
As you know California is on the verge of disaster. The economy of the

state is dependent on the ability to move water from the northern
reaches of the state to the south. The pipelines that complete this are
known as the Central Valley Project and the State Water Project. This
movement of water serves more than three million acres of farmland and
over 25 million people. An absence of political leadership has caused a
lack of investment in the infrastructure required to make these Projects
capable of continuing service to the state.
Furthermore, extreme environmental regulations have subjected the
Projects to severe operational restrictions under the Endangered Species
Act. As a consequence, we are facing catastrophic water supply
shortages - literally a regulatory drought.
In lieu of my annual Central Valley Ag Tour, I am holding a Water

Seminar on March 27th to address this crisis. This seminar will discuss
what we can expect from the water crisis, solutions, and strategies for
survival.
I do not believe I am exaggerating when I state that the people in the

San Joaquin Valley are facing a humanitarian crisis unparalleled in
modern history. Unemployment figures could reach staggering levels. I
urge you to join me on the 27th so we can better understand the looming
crisis and for the sake of valley residents, develop some solutions.
Solutions that I believe can only be achieved through the cooperation of
governments, elected officials, private enterprise, etc.
Friday, March 27, 2009

10:00 a.m. to Noon
Tulare County Ag Commissioner's Office
4437 S. Laspina St. Tulare, CA 93274
Please RSVP by contacting my Visalia office (559-733-3861 or

Nicky.Henderson@mail.house.gov ). I hope to see you on March 27th.
________________________________________________________________________
______
Nicky Henderson
Special Projects Director
113 N Church Street, Suite 208
Visalia, CA 93291
559.972.1915 Cell
559.733.3861 Office
559.733.3865 Fax
Nicky.Henderson@Mail.House.Gov
Gary W Kunkel
Agricultural Commissioner/Sealer
County of Tulare
4437 S Laspina St
Tulare, CA 93274
Voice: (559) 685-3323 Ext. 209
MAIL
Subject: new video: Nunes questions Geithner
Date: 11-Mar-2009 13:14
Message Id: 49B7B938.VIS.PO4.200.2000036.1.3ABEB.1
Dear Friends,
I wanted to bring to your attention a video I recently posted on YouTube

<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes> . It involves the current
crisis facing our state - the man made drought - as well as my concerns
related to federal spending, which already (in these early days of the
111th Congress) top the combined spending of our government from 1789 to
1960.
Treasury Secretary Geithner was before the House Budget Committee to

defend President Obama's spending plan for 2010. While I was afforded
very limited time to question the Secretary on the record, I used my
time to re-iterate the concerns I have already shared with the
President.
You can click here

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PD1pYcokFRo&feature=channel_page> or
view the video from my website www.nunes.house.gov.
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

Congress.
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I wanted to bring to your attention a video I recently posted on YouTube. It involves the current crisis facing
our state – the man made drought – as well as my concerns related to federal spending, which already (in
these early days of the 111th Congress) top the combined spending of our government from 1789 to 1960.
Treasury Secretary Geithner was before the House Budget Committee to defend President Obama’s spending
plan for 2010. While I was afforded very limited time to question the Secretary on the record, I used my
time to re-iterate the concerns I have already shared with the President.
You can click here or view the video from my website www.nunes.house.gov.
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: making history: live smelt submitted to the Congressional record
Date: 01-Apr-2009 17:09
Message Id: 49D39FE1.VIS.PO4.200.20000DF.1.17E66.1
Dear Friends,
The articles below appeared in several national press reports today.

However, full coverage of the issue at hand -- the man-made drought
destroying San Joaquin Valley communities -- continues to evade the
crack reporters assigned to monitor Congress.
If you would like to view my testimony before the House Natural

Resources Committee, including the submission of small fish to the
Congressional Record, please click here <http://click%20here> . (or
visit www.nunes.house.gov)
Thanks for your interest,
DEVIN NUNES
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

Congress.
<http://www.rollcall.com/issues/hoh/>
Saving Nemo
Rep. Devin Nunes created a rather fishy situation when he brought about
a dozen live rainbow smelt to a House Natural Resources Committee
hearing on Tuesday morning.
To drive home his message that too much water is being diverted in
California to benefit the endangered delta smelt, the Golden State
Republican asked unanimous consent to enter a large goldfish bowl full
of rainbow smelt (cousin to the delta) into the record.
The fish, Nunes said, are contributing to California's drought. "You can
have them, we don't want 'em," he quipped.
No one objected, and so a photograph of the fish will be used for the
official record, according to committee staff.
But the fate of the live fish remains unclear.
District Department of the Environment officials will head to Capitol

Hill "sometime in the near future" to pick up the fish, spokesman Alan
Heymann confirmed to HOH.
There is one hiccup, however: The rainbow smelt are not native to the
region (they originate in Maine), so officials cannot release them into
the wild.
So where will the homeless fish wind up? "We are still in the process of
determining that," Heymann said.
Here's to hoping the little guys won't be sleeping with the ... er,
fishes.
A fishy subcommittee hearing (from politico.com
<http://www.politico.com/> )
Speeches, charts, documents - this is the type of stuff we expect to be

submitted in committee records.
But smelt?
Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) apparently made some sort of congressional

history Tuesday when he asked the Natural Resources Subcommittee on
Water and Power Oversight for "unanimous consent to submit these fish
for the record." And then he handed the fishbowl to subcommittee
Chairwoman Grace F. Napolitano (D-Calif.).
Submitting fish into committee records is apparently a first.
To explain: The hearing was about the California drought, but Nunes and
other Republicans complain that the drought is man-made and
environmental regulations have shut down the water transport system
because environmentalists believe it is hurting native smelt, which are
eaten by some and used as bait by others.
It's not clear what happened to these smelt after the hearing, though
Nunes spokesman Andrew House made it clear that "they were alive when we
submitted them."
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
The articles below appeared in several national press reports today. However, full coverage of the issue at
hand -- the man-made drought destroying San Joaquin Valley communities -- continues to evade the crack
reporters assigned to monitor Congress.
If you would like to view my testimony before the House Natural Resources Committee, including the
submission of small fish to the Congressional Record, please click here. (or visit www.nunes.house.gov)
DEVIN NUNES
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
Saving Nemo
Rep. Devin Nunes created a rather fishy situation when he brought about a dozen live rainbow
smelt to a House Natural Resources Committee hearing on Tuesday morning.
To drive home his message that too much water is being diverted in California to benefit the
endangered delta smelt, the Golden State Republican asked unanimous consent to enter a large
goldfish bowl full of rainbow smelt (cousin to the delta) into the record.
The fish, Nunes said, are contributing to California’s drought. “You can have them, we don’t want ’
em,” he quipped.
No one objected, and so a photograph of the fish will be used for the official record, according to
committee staff.
But the fate of the live fish remains unclear.
District Department of the Environment officials will head to Capitol Hill “sometime in the near
future” to pick up the fish, spokesman Alan Heymann confirmed to HOH.
There is one hiccup, however: The rainbow smelt are not native to the region (they originate in
Maine), so officials cannot release them into the wild.
So where will the homeless fish wind up? “We are still in the process of determining that,”
Heymann said.
Here’s to hoping the little guys won’t be sleeping with the ... er, fishes.
A fishy subcommittee hearing (from politico.com)

Speeches, charts, documents — this is the type of stuff we expect to be submitted in committee
records.
But smelt?
Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) apparently made some sort of congressional history Tuesday when
he asked the Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water and Power Oversight for “unanimous
consent to submit these fish for the record.” And then he handed the fishbowl to subcommittee
Chairwoman Grace F. Napolitano (D-Calif.).
Submitting fish into committee records is apparently a first.
To explain: The hearing was about the California drought, but Nunes and other Republicans
complain that the drought is man-made and environmental regulations have shut down the water
transport system because environmentalists believe it is hurting native smelt, which are eaten by
some and used as bait by others.
It’s not clear what happened to these smelt after the hearing, though Nunes spokesman Andrew
House made it clear that “they were alive when we submitted them.”
MAIL
Subject: water issues require accountability
Date: 06-Apr-2009 07:48
Message Id: 49D9B3DB.VIS.PO4.200.2000052.1.1BD82.1
Dear Friends,
On Sunday, the Fresno Bee printed an editorial I wrote in response to

the valley's water crisis. I have attached the column for your review.
Thanks for your interest.
Sincerely,
DEVIN NUNES
Member of Congress

Congress.
Water issues require accountability
Sunday, Apr. 05, 2009
By Devin Nunes
In recent weeks, I have suggested that registered Democrats of the San

Joaquin Valley change their party affiliation. My intent isn't a plea to
grow Republican registration and it is not a partisan attack. It is
simply a message to Valley residents -- you and your family are under
siege and the Democratic Party is leading the attack.
Don't get me wrong, Democrats have, in the past, contributed to the

greatness of our state, as well as the San Joaquin Valley's rich
agricultural heritage. For example, President John F. Kennedy and other
Democrats from his generation helped build significant portions of
California's massive water infrastructure on which the world's most
diverse and productive farming region depends.
However, these aren't the Democrats who control the party today. House
Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her radical liberal Democrats have taken their
place. Many of these liberals have been in Congress for the past 30
years and have ushered in far-reaching environmental laws -- some of
which were crammed into must-pass legislation in the dead of the night.
These laws have whittled away our ability to deliver water to families
in the San Joaquin Valley.
It has become increasingly clear that radical greenies now control the
agenda in Washington. Indeed, numerous news accounts have detailed the
interwoven connection between environmental radicals and the Democratic
Party. This relationship results in aggressive campaigns to unseat
Republicans and install liberal Democrats who are willing to do their
dirty work.
Republicans have tried to make changes that would allow California's
water system to accommodate both human and environmental needs. But any
attempt to take a balanced approach is met with stiff resistance.
In fact, after his effort to reform the Endangered Species Act, former
Republican Rep. Richard Pombo, found himself buried in negative
advertising by environmental groups -- to the tune of millions.
In the end, Pombo was ousted by the environmental movement in favor of a

liberal Democrat from the Bay Area. This new liberal joined his friends
in Congress who have spent their entire careers systematically
destroying our economy in the San Joaquin Valley.
Clearly their work is not complete. In an effort to appease their

environmentalist patrons, the Democrats just enacted the San Joaquin
River settlement, which will virtually block construction of a new
reservoir at Temperance Flat -- one of our last hopes for new water
storage in the San Joaquin Valley.
Many lawmakers try to have it both ways. Dancing the Potomac two-step,
they insist they support Temperance Flat while at the same time enacting
a new law which has made construction nearly impossible. The ability of
such lawmakers to have it both ways, to pay lip service to our crisis
while marching to the tune of environmental radicals, is the core of our
problem.
This brings me to our present crisis: the man-made drought.
Time and again, I have told my colleagues in Congress that we are

experiencing a man-made drought, not simply an act of God. In point of
fact, cyclical low rainfall is a characteristic of life in the San
Joaquin Valley and our region has survived much worse droughts with far
less economic impact.
The difference in this situation is that, through legal and legislative

action, our water has systematically been diverted away from families in
the valley and subsequently dumped into the ocean.
Residents of the San Joaquin Valley need to hold their leaders

accountable. While there have been many meetings, public hearings and
rallies, they are meaningless if our elected leaders are permitted to
make promises to us in front of the camera, then do nothing behind their
office doors.
Sound bites and slogans should not be substituted for action. I have
spelled out three simple initiatives to elected leaders in Washington
and Sacramento -- initiatives that would bring water to our region.
The San Joaquin River settlement must be replaced with a reasonable

restoration plan that permits the construction of Temperance Flat. This
would provide more water for communities on the east side of the Valley.
The Endangered Species Act must be temporarily waived to ensure water

deliveries from the Delta arrive to the Valley's west-side communities
immediately.
The federal and state government should approve the construction of a

canal that bypasses the delta. This peripheral canal will be paid for by
those who use it.
Now is the time to tell your elected leaders to drop the hot air and
pick up a shovel. If they fail to do so, Valley families should take
action: use your votes to win your water. Because water, not words, will
feed our families.
###
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
On Sunday, the Fresno Bee printed an editorial I wrote in response to the valley’s water crisis. I have
attached the column for your review.
Sincerely,
DEVIN NUNES
Member of Congress
By Devin Nunes
In recent weeks, I have suggested that registered Democrats of the San Joaquin Valley change their party
affiliation. My intent isn't a plea to grow Republican registration and it is not a partisan attack. It is simply a
message to Valley residents -- you and your family are under siege and the Democratic Party is leading the
attack.
Don't get me wrong, Democrats have, in the past, contributed to the greatness of our state, as well as the San
Joaquin Valley's rich agricultural heritage. For example, President John F. Kennedy and other Democrats
from his generation helped build significant portions of California's massive water infrastructure on which
the world's most diverse and productive farming region depends.
However, these aren't the Democrats who control the party today. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her
radical liberal Democrats have taken their place. Many of these liberals have been in Congress for the past
30 years and have ushered in far-reaching environmental laws -- some of which were crammed into must-
pass legislation in the dead of the night. These laws have whittled away our ability to deliver water to
families in the San Joaquin Valley.
It has become increasingly clear that radical greenies now control the agenda in Washington. Indeed,
numerous news accounts have detailed the interwoven connection between environmental radicals and the
Democratic Party. This relationship results in aggressive campaigns to unseat Republicans and install liberal
Democrats who are willing to do their dirty work.
Republicans have tried to make changes that would allow California's water system to accommodate both
human and environmental needs. But any attempt to take a balanced approach is met with stiff resistance.
In fact, after his effort to reform the Endangered Species Act, former Republican Rep. Richard Pombo,
found himself buried in negative advertising by environmental groups -- to the tune of millions.
In the end, Pombo was ousted by the environmental movement in favor of a liberal Democrat from the Bay
Area. This new liberal joined his friends in Congress who have spent their entire careers systematically
Clearly their work is not complete. In an effort to appease their environmentalist patrons, the Democrats just
enacted the San Joaquin River settlement, which will virtually block construction of a new reservoir at
Temperance Flat -- one of our last hopes for new water storage in the San Joaquin Valley.
Many lawmakers try to have it both ways. Dancing the Potomac two-step, they insist they support
Temperance Flat while at the same time enacting a new law which has made construction nearly impossible.
The ability of such lawmakers to have it both ways, to pay lip service to our crisis while marching to the tune
of environmental radicals, is the core of our problem.
Time and again, I have told my colleagues in Congress that we are experiencing a man-made drought, not
simply an act of God. In point of fact, cyclical low rainfall is a characteristic of life in the San Joaquin Valley
and our region has survived much worse droughts with far less economic impact.
The difference in this situation is that, through legal and legislative action, our water has systematically been
diverted away from families in the valley and subsequently dumped into the ocean.
Residents of the San Joaquin Valley need to hold their leaders accountable. While there have been many
meetings, public hearings and rallies, they are meaningless if our elected leaders are permitted to make
promises to us in front of the camera, then do nothing behind their office doors.
Sound bites and slogans should not be substituted for action. I have spelled out three simple initiatives to
elected leaders in Washington and Sacramento -- initiatives that would bring water to our region.
The San Joaquin River settlement must be replaced with a reasonable restoration plan that permits the
construction of Temperance Flat. This would provide more water for communities on the east side of the
Valley.
The Endangered Species Act must be temporarily waived to ensure water deliveries from the Delta arrive to
the Valley's west-side communities immediately.
The federal and state government should approve the construction of a canal that bypasses the delta. This
peripheral canal will be paid for by those who use it.
Now is the time to tell your elected leaders to drop the hot air and pick up a shovel. If they fail to do so,
Valley families should take action: use your votes to win your water. Because water, not words, will feed our
families.
###
MAIL
Subject: water issues require accountability
Date: 06-Apr-2009 07:50
Message Id: 49D9B454.VIS.PO4.200.2000067.1.1B5F7.1
Dear Friends,
On Sunday, the Fresno Bee printed an editorial I wrote in response to

the valley's water crisis. I have attached the column for your review.
Sincerely,
DEVIN NUNES
Member of Congress

Congress.
By Devin Nunes
In recent weeks, I have suggested that registered Democrats of the San

Joaquin Valley change their party affiliation. My intent isn't a plea to
grow Republican registration and it is not a partisan attack. It is
simply a message to Valley residents -- you and your family are under
siege and the Democratic Party is leading the attack.
Don't get me wrong, Democrats have, in the past, contributed to the

greatness of our state, as well as the San Joaquin Valley's rich
agricultural heritage. For example, President John F. Kennedy and other
Democrats from his generation helped build significant portions of
California's massive water infrastructure on which the world's most
diverse and productive farming region depends.
However, these aren't the Democrats who control the party today. House
Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her radical liberal Democrats have taken their
place. Many of these liberals have been in Congress for the past 30
years and have ushered in far-reaching environmental laws -- some of
which were crammed into must-pass legislation in the dead of the night.
These laws have whittled away our ability to deliver water to families
in the San Joaquin Valley.
It has become increasingly clear that radical greenies now control the
agenda in Washington. Indeed, numerous news accounts have detailed the
interwoven connection between environmental radicals and the Democratic
Party. This relationship results in aggressive campaigns to unseat
Republicans and install liberal Democrats who are willing to do their
dirty work.
Republicans have tried to make changes that would allow California's
water system to accommodate both human and environmental needs. But any
attempt to take a balanced approach is met with stiff resistance.
In fact, after his effort to reform the Endangered Species Act, former
Republican Rep. Richard Pombo, found himself buried in negative
advertising by environmental groups -- to the tune of millions.
In the end, Pombo was ousted by the environmental movement in favor of a

liberal Democrat from the Bay Area. This new liberal joined his friends
in Congress who have spent their entire careers systematically
Clearly their work is not complete. In an effort to appease their

environmentalist patrons, the Democrats just enacted the San Joaquin
River settlement, which will virtually block construction of a new
reservoir at Temperance Flat -- one of our last hopes for new water
storage in the San Joaquin Valley.
Many lawmakers try to have it both ways. Dancing the Potomac two-step,
they insist they support Temperance Flat while at the same time enacting
a new law which has made construction nearly impossible. The ability of
such lawmakers to have it both ways, to pay lip service to our crisis
while marching to the tune of environmental radicals, is the core of our
problem.
Time and again, I have told my colleagues in Congress that we are

experiencing a man-made drought, not simply an act of God. In point of
fact, cyclical low rainfall is a characteristic of life in the San
Joaquin Valley and our region has survived much worse droughts with far
less economic impact.
The difference in this situation is that, through legal and legislative

action, our water has systematically been diverted away from families in
the valley and subsequently dumped into the ocean.
Residents of the San Joaquin Valley need to hold their leaders

accountable. While there have been many meetings, public hearings and
rallies, they are meaningless if our elected leaders are permitted to
make promises to us in front of the camera, then do nothing behind their
office doors.
Sound bites and slogans should not be substituted for action. I have
spelled out three simple initiatives to elected leaders in Washington
and Sacramento -- initiatives that would bring water to our region.
The San Joaquin River settlement must be replaced with a reasonable

restoration plan that permits the construction of Temperance Flat. This
would provide more water for communities on the east side of the Valley.
The Endangered Species Act must be temporarily waived to ensure water

deliveries from the Delta arrive to the Valley's west-side communities
immediately.
The federal and state government should approve the construction of a

canal that bypasses the delta. This peripheral canal will be paid for by
those who use it.
Now is the time to tell your elected leaders to drop the hot air and
pick up a shovel. If they fail to do so, Valley families should take
action: use your votes to win your water. Because water, not words, will
feed our families.
###
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
On Sunday, the Fresno Bee printed an editorial I wrote in response to the valley’s water crisis. I have
attached the column for your review.
Sincerely,
DEVIN NUNES
Member of Congress
By Devin Nunes
In recent weeks, I have suggested that registered Democrats of the San Joaquin Valley change their party
affiliation. My intent isn't a plea to grow Republican registration and it is not a partisan attack. It is simply a
message to Valley residents -- you and your family are under siege and the Democratic Party is leading the
attack.
Don't get me wrong, Democrats have, in the past, contributed to the greatness of our state, as well as the San
Joaquin Valley's rich agricultural heritage. For example, President John F. Kennedy and other Democrats
from his generation helped build significant portions of California's massive water infrastructure on which
the world's most diverse and productive farming region depends.
However, these aren't the Democrats who control the party today. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her
radical liberal Democrats have taken their place. Many of these liberals have been in Congress for the past
30 years and have ushered in far-reaching environmental laws -- some of which were crammed into must-
pass legislation in the dead of the night. These laws have whittled away our ability to deliver water to
families in the San Joaquin Valley.
It has become increasingly clear that radical greenies now control the agenda in Washington. Indeed,
numerous news accounts have detailed the interwoven connection between environmental radicals and the
Democratic Party. This relationship results in aggressive campaigns to unseat Republicans and install liberal
Democrats who are willing to do their dirty work.
Republicans have tried to make changes that would allow California's water system to accommodate both
human and environmental needs. But any attempt to take a balanced approach is met with stiff resistance.
In fact, after his effort to reform the Endangered Species Act, former Republican Rep. Richard Pombo,
found himself buried in negative advertising by environmental groups -- to the tune of millions.
In the end, Pombo was ousted by the environmental movement in favor of a liberal Democrat from the Bay
Area. This new liberal joined his friends in Congress who have spent their entire careers systematically
Clearly their work is not complete. In an effort to appease their environmentalist patrons, the Democrats just
enacted the San Joaquin River settlement, which will virtually block construction of a new reservoir at
Temperance Flat -- one of our last hopes for new water storage in the San Joaquin Valley.
Many lawmakers try to have it both ways. Dancing the Potomac two-step, they insist they support
Temperance Flat while at the same time enacting a new law which has made construction nearly impossible.
The ability of such lawmakers to have it both ways, to pay lip service to our crisis while marching to the tune
of environmental radicals, is the core of our problem.
Time and again, I have told my colleagues in Congress that we are experiencing a man-made drought, not
simply an act of God. In point of fact, cyclical low rainfall is a characteristic of life in the San Joaquin Valley
and our region has survived much worse droughts with far less economic impact.
The difference in this situation is that, through legal and legislative action, our water has systematically been
diverted away from families in the valley and subsequently dumped into the ocean.
Residents of the San Joaquin Valley need to hold their leaders accountable. While there have been many
meetings, public hearings and rallies, they are meaningless if our elected leaders are permitted to make
promises to us in front of the camera, then do nothing behind their office doors.
Sound bites and slogans should not be substituted for action. I have spelled out three simple initiatives to
elected leaders in Washington and Sacramento -- initiatives that would bring water to our region.
The San Joaquin River settlement must be replaced with a reasonable restoration plan that permits the
construction of Temperance Flat. This would provide more water for communities on the east side of the
Valley.
The Endangered Species Act must be temporarily waived to ensure water deliveries from the Delta arrive to
the Valley's west-side communities immediately.
The federal and state government should approve the construction of a canal that bypasses the delta. This
peripheral canal will be paid for by those who use it.
Now is the time to tell your elected leaders to drop the hot air and pick up a shovel. If they fail to do so,
Valley families should take action: use your votes to win your water. Because water, not words, will feed our
families.
###
MAIL
Subject: In case you missed it: Fresno Bee says "Nunes' slam on governor bold, not risky"
Date: 27-Apr-2009 11:00
Message Id: 49F59045.VIS.PO4.200.2000001.1.11C9AD.1
Dear Friends,
I thought you might find this article from Friday's Fresno Bee of
interest.
Sincerely,
DEVIN NUNES
Member of Congress

Congress.
Nunes' slam on governor bold, not risky

Friday, Apr. 24, 2009
By John Ellis and Michael Doyle / The Fresno Bee
Rep. Devin Nunes expected Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to cap last week's
March for Water by boldly challenging President Barack Obama to turn on
the massive Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta pumps.
The Visalia Republican even prepared a news release flowing with praise
for the governor, an aide said.
Instead, Schwarzenegger lamented that farmworkers were losing their jobs

and said he is determined to get a comprehensive solution to the state's
water needs.
Nunes, outraged, dubbed the governor's speech "lip service" -- and then
called on him to resign.
"When a government can't provide the people access to a reliable supply

of water, it has failed," Nunes said. "This government has utterly
failed, and Gov. Schwarzenegger should resign from office."
Ordinarily, telling a fellow Republican -- and the state's chief

executive -- to resign would carry a huge political risk. But times have
changed, experts say.
"It's a safe move and a smart move" for Nunes, said John J. Pitney, a
government professor at Claremont McKenna College in Southern
California. "At the moment, Schwarzenegger is unpopular across the
board. Even if his approval ratings climb a bit in the next year, it is
unlikely Nunes will pay a price."
Now a lame duck with less than two years left to serve, Schwarzenegger
is viewed unfavorably by 60% of Californians -- including 53% of
Republicans -- according to a March survey by the Public Policy
Institute of California.
And the flip side: Nunes may win points with his core constituency.
Locally, there is anger not only about water, but also over
Schwarzenegger's push for six budget proposals on the ballot May 19. The
proposals are part of a deal struck by the governor and lawmakers to
close the state's projected $42 billion budget deficit through June
2010.
"The governor has absolutely no power left to punish anybody, and my

interpretation of what Devin said is that most people agree with him,"
said local political strategist Michael Der Manouel Jr. "I don't know
anybody who supports the job the governor has done the past two or three
years."
Even a relatively unpopular sitting governor enjoys regulatory,

patronage and funding powers that can be deployed for friends and
against foes.
It would be hard, however, for Schwarzenegger to punish Nunes, experts

say.
He has little political influence in Washington and few allies in the

nation's capital, said Tom Holyoke, an assistant professor of political
science at California State University, Fresno.
And if the governor sought to kill projects or redirect funding away

from Nunes' district -- either at the state or federal levels -- he
would risk hurting political allies who took "an immense political risk"
to support the controversial budget deal struck earlier this year,
Holyoke said.
State Sens. Roy Ashburn of Bakersfield and Dave Cogdill of Modesto and
Assembly Member Mike Villines of Clovis are three Republicans who broke
party ranks to support the budget deal. Nunes' federal district overlaps
each of their districts.
He also needs them as allies ahead of the May 19 election, Holyoke said.
Schwarzenegger's office declined to comment.
For Nunes, the attack on Schwarzenegger is not entirely out of

character. Particularly on San Joaquin Valley irrigation deliveries,
Nunes has a history of being blunt.
"It's not a concern of mine," Nunes said when asked about the political
and legislative consequences of his attack on Schwarzenegger. "What I'm
trying to do is save people's jobs."
Since first winning his House seat in 2002, the 35-year-old Nunes has
repeatedly challenged his colleagues. He championed redistricting reform
in 2005, when many House members opposed it. California voters rejected
the redistricting ballot measure by a 3-2 margin.
The next year, Nunes bluntly and successfully challenged the
then-chairman of the powerful House Appropriations Committee -- a
Republican -- on a dairy dispute.
More recently, Nunes has maneuvered against Rep. George Radanovich,

R-Mariposa, over ambitious plans to restore the San Joaquin River. Over
Nunes' objections, the House overwhelmingly approved the river plan as
part of a larger public lands bill, and Obama signed it into law.
So far, despite some constituent calls in support, no other public

figures have followed Nunes' demand for Schwarzenegger's resignation
over the failure to provide more irrigation water. Nunes, nonetheless,
remains angry.
"He's either under the total control of the radical environmentalists,

or he's totally incompetent," Nunes said this week, echoing last week's
resignation demand.
Last Friday, the Nisei Farmers League, California Alliance for Jobs and
the Western Growers Association and the Metropolitan Water District of
Southern California quickly produced press releases supporting
Schwarzenegger.
"It's definitely going to cause some exciting times for his office,"
predicted Manuel Cunha, president of the Fresno-based Nisei Farmers
League, adding that he was "disappointed" by the congressman's
resignation demand.
Metropolitan Water District issued its statement after being encouraged

to do so by the Governor's Office, a district spokesman said Monday.
Other farm-group leaders were likewise contacted by the Governor's
Office and urged to produce similar statements in support of
Schwarzenegger.
But it is unlikely to go much beyond that, political watchers and

experts said.
"If I was advising the governor, I'd tell him to do nothing," said
Pitney, the Claremont McKenna College professor. "If he punishes Nunes,
he makes him a martyr and a hero and vastly increases his status. There
are few things better for a political career than being kicked from
above and remain standing."
The reporters can be reached at mdoyle@mcclatchydc.com or (202) 383-0006

and jellis@fresnobee.com or (559)441-6320.
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I thought you might find this article from Friday’s Fresno Bee of interest.
Sincerely,
DEVIN NUNES
Member of Congress
Nunes' slam on governor bold, not risky
Friday, Apr. 24, 2009
By John Ellis and Michael Doyle / The Fresno Bee
Rep. Devin Nunes expected Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to cap last week's March for Water by boldly
challenging President Barack Obama to turn on the massive Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta pumps.
The Visalia Republican even prepared a news release flowing with praise for the governor, an aide said.
Instead, Schwarzenegger lamented that farmworkers were losing their jobs and said he is determined to get a
comprehensive solution to the state's water needs.
Nunes, outraged, dubbed the governor's speech "lip service" -- and then called on him to resign.
"When a government can't provide the people access to a reliable supply of water, it has failed," Nunes said.
"This government has utterly failed, and Gov. Schwarzenegger should resign from office."
Ordinarily, telling a fellow Republican -- and the state's chief executive -- to resign would carry a huge
political risk. But times have changed, experts say.
"It's a safe move and a smart move" for Nunes, said John J. Pitney, a government professor at Claremont
McKenna College in Southern California. "At the moment, Schwarzenegger is unpopular across the board.
Even if his approval ratings climb a bit in the next year, it is unlikely Nunes will pay a price."
Now a lame duck with less than two years left to serve, Schwarzenegger is viewed unfavorably by 60% of
Californians -- including 53% of Republicans -- according to a March survey by the Public Policy Institute
of California.
And the flip side: Nunes may win points with his core constituency.
Locally, there is anger not only about water, but also over Schwarzenegger's push for six budget proposals
on the ballot May 19. The proposals are part of a deal struck by the governor and lawmakers to close the
state's projected $42 billion budget deficit through June 2010.
"The governor has absolutely no power left to punish anybody, and my interpretation of what Devin said is
that most people agree with him," said local political strategist Michael Der Manouel Jr. "I don't know
anybody who supports the job the governor has done the past two or three years."
Even a relatively unpopular sitting governor enjoys regulatory, patronage and funding powers that can be
deployed for friends and against foes.
It would be hard, however, for Schwarzenegger to punish Nunes, experts say.
He has little political influence in Washington and few allies in the nation's capital, said Tom Holyoke, an
assistant professor of political science at California State University, Fresno.
And if the governor sought to kill projects or redirect funding away from Nunes' district -- either at the state
or federal levels -- he would risk hurting political allies who took "an immense political risk" to support the
controversial budget deal struck earlier this year, Holyoke said.
State Sens. Roy Ashburn of Bakersfield and Dave Cogdill of Modesto and Assembly Member Mike Villines
of Clovis are three Republicans who broke party ranks to support the budget deal. Nunes' federal district
overlaps each of their districts.
He also needs them as allies ahead of the May 19 election, Holyoke said.
Schwarzenegger's office declined to comment.
For Nunes, the attack on Schwarzenegger is not entirely out of character. Particularly on San Joaquin Valley
irrigation deliveries, Nunes has a history of being blunt.
"It's not a concern of mine," Nunes said when asked about the political and legislative consequences of his
attack on Schwarzenegger. "What I'm trying to do is save people's jobs."
Since first winning his House seat in 2002, the 35-year-old Nunes has repeatedly challenged his colleagues.
He championed redistricting reform in 2005, when many House members opposed it. California voters
rejected the redistricting ballot measure by a 3-2 margin.
The next year, Nunes bluntly and successfully challenged the then-chairman of the powerful House
Appropriations Committee -- a Republican -- on a dairy dispute.
More recently, Nunes has maneuvered against Rep. George Radanovich, R-Mariposa, over ambitious plans
to restore the San Joaquin River. Over Nunes' objections, the House overwhelmingly approved the river plan
as part of a larger public lands bill, and Obama signed it into law.
So far, despite some constituent calls in support, no other public figures have followed Nunes' demand for
Schwarzenegger's resignation over the failure to provide more irrigation water. Nunes, nonetheless, remains
angry.
"He's either under the total control of the radical environmentalists, or he's totally incompetent," Nunes said
this week, echoing last week's resignation demand.
Last Friday, the Nisei Farmers League, California Alliance for Jobs and the Western Growers Association
and the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California quickly produced press releases supporting
Schwarzenegger.
"It's definitely going to cause some exciting times for his office," predicted Manuel Cunha, president of the
Fresno-based Nisei Farmers League, adding that he was "disappointed" by the congressman's resignation
demand.
Metropolitan Water District issued its statement after being encouraged to do so by the Governor's Office, a
district spokesman said Monday. Other farm-group leaders were likewise contacted by the Governor's Office
and urged to produce similar statements in support of Schwarzenegger.
But it is unlikely to go much beyond that, political watchers and experts said.
"If I was advising the governor, I'd tell him to do nothing," said Pitney, the Claremont McKenna College
professor. "If he punishes Nunes, he makes him a martyr and a hero and vastly increases his status. There are
few things better for a political career than being kicked from above and remain standing."
The reporters can be reached at mdoyle@mcclatchydc.com or (202) 383-0006 and jellis@fresnobee.com or

(559)441-6320.
MAIL
From: MOLMOS@ci.visalia.ca.us
To: Phil Cox, Jean Rousseau, Britt Fussel
Subject: FW: Letter to and From FEMA
Date: 02-May-2009 16:32
FEMA Flood Insurance Study.pdf [Save] [Open]
Response to Rep Nunes.pdf [Save] [Open]
Message Id: 49FC7585.VIS.PO4.200.200007F.1.23809.1
Here are letters exchanged between Devin Nunes and FEMA that were
mentioned at Friday's meeting.
-----Original Message-----
From: Griswold, Lewis - Fresno [mailto:lgriswold@fresnobee.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 2:24 PM
To: Michael Olmos
Mike,
Have you seen this? FEMA is responding to Rep. Devin Nunes re: flood
maps.
Lew Griswold
Fresno Bee
559.622.2416
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Here are letters exchanged between Devin Nunes and FEMA that were mentioned at Friday’s meeting.
From: Griswold, Lewis - Fresno [mailto:lgriswold@fresnobee.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 2:24 PM
To: Michael Olmos
Mike,
Have you seen this? FEMA is responding to Rep. Devin Nunes re: flood maps.
Lew Griswold
Fresno Bee
559.622.2416
MAIL
Subject: The wish amendment? Nunes blasts Democratic leaders in the House for ignoring the California water crisis
Date: 09-Jul-2009 12:07
Message Id: 4A55DD66.VIS.PO4.200.2000095.1.2A5C1.1
Dear Friends,
Today's agriculture spending bill gave me yet another opportunity to put

the Democratic leadership on record.
The American people are watching and we will not allow the devastation
in California to go unnoticed. The government has a responsibility to
provide a safe and reliable source of water to the people. This duty
has been ignored by Congress and our President.
See my remarks on the House Floor today by clicking here.

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgTPIRMAWq4>
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
If you would like to contact me, please visit my website at

www.nunes.house.gov <http://www.nunes.house.gov/> . If you would like
to be removed from my mailing list, please send a message to
LISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.GOV with the text "SIGNOFF NEWSLETTER-CA21" in the
body of the message.
<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>
<http://www.facebook.com/people/Devin-Nunes/1693459598>
<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Today’s agriculture spending bill gave me yet another opportunity to put the Democratic leadership on
record.
The American people are watching and we will not allow the devastation in California to go unnoticed. The
government has a responsibility to provide a safe and reliable source of water to the people. This duty has
been ignored by Congress and our President.
See my remarks on the House Floor today by clicking here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
If you would like to contact me, please visit my website at www.nunes.house.gov. If you would like to be removed from my mailing
list, please send a message to LISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.GOV with the text "SIGNOFF NEWSLETTER-CA21" in the body of the
message.
MAIL
Subject: health care reform update
Date: 20-Jul-2009 13:01
Message Id: 4A646A9E.VIS.PO4.200.2000067.1.1DC0E.1
Dear Friends,
Congressional leaders are moving forward with their plan to create a

framework for socialized medicine in America. Funded in part with
massive new taxes and mandates on businesses, the legislation before
Congress will force more than 100 million Americans into a substandard
government-run health program.
As a Member of the Ways and Means Committee, I worked with my Republican

colleagues in an effort to improve the bill by offering a number of
amendments. Indeed, I and others have authored alternative legislation
that should be considered by Congress - reforms that achieve meaningful
long-term cost savings while providing universal access to quality
health care (see here
<http://nunes.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Issues.View&Issue_id=f1625c
a4-b0d0-fc95-f891-0662d03d12be> ). Each of our proposals, however, was
defeated by the Democrat majority.
In the final bill passed by the Ways and Means Committee, Democrats
insisted that a new government-run health program be created. However,
they voted against an amendment that would have required Members of
Congress to be enrolled in the new program
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1VJaZwRMKQ> - what's good for the
American people clearly isn't good enough for Democrats in Congress.
I have posted video of the debate on my YouTube Page
<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes> . I have also blogged about
the recent American Medical Association decision to endorse the bill
<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/2009/07/open-letter-to-physicians-of-cal
ifornia.html> .
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Congressional leaders are moving forward with their plan to create a framework for socialized medicine in
America. Funded in part with massive new taxes and mandates on businesses, the legislation before
Congress will force more than 100 million Americans into a substandard government-run health program.
As a Member of the Ways and Means Committee, I worked with my Republican colleagues in an effort to
improve the bill by offering a number of amendments. Indeed, I and others have authored alternative
legislation that should be considered by Congress – reforms that achieve meaningful long-term cost savings
while providing universal access to quality health care (see here). Each of our proposals, however, was
In the final bill passed by the Ways and Means Committee, Democrats insisted that a new government-run
health program be created. However, they voted against an amendment that would have required Members
of Congress to be enrolled in the new program – what’s good for the American people clearly isn’t good
enough for Democrats in Congress.
I have posted video of the debate on my YouTube Page. I have also blogged about the recent American
Medical Association decision to endorse the bill.
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
MAIL
Subject: health care reform update
Date: 20-Jul-2009 12:57
Message Id: 4A6469BE.VIS.PO4.200.20000C7.1.2B359.1
Dear Friends,
Congressional leaders are moving forward with their plan to create a

framework for socialized medicine in America. Funded in part with
massive new taxes and mandates on businesses, the legislation before
Congress will force more than 100 million Americans into a substandard
government-run health program.
As a Member of the Ways and Means Committee, I worked with my Republican

colleagues in an effort to improve the bill by offering a number of
amendments. Indeed, I and others have authored alternative legislation
that should be considered by Congress - reforms that achieve meaningful
long-term cost savings while providing universal access to quality
health care (see here
<http://nunes.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Issues.View&Issue_id=f1625c
a4-b0d0-fc95-f891-0662d03d12be> ). Each of our proposals, however, was
In the final bill passed by the Ways and Means Committee, Democrats
insisted that a new government-run health program be created. However,
they voted against an amendment that would have required Members of
Congress to be enrolled in the new program
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1VJaZwRMKQ> - what's good for the
American people clearly isn't good enough for Democrats in Congress.
I have posted video of the debate on my YouTube Page
<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes> . I have also blogged about
the recent American Medical Association decision to endorse the bill
<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/2009/07/open-letter-to-physicians-of-cal
ifornia.html> .
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Congressional leaders are moving forward with their plan to create a framework for socialized medicine in
America. Funded in part with massive new taxes and mandates on businesses, the legislation before
Congress will force more than 100 million Americans into a substandard government-run health program.
As a Member of the Ways and Means Committee, I worked with my Republican colleagues in an effort to
improve the bill by offering a number of amendments. Indeed, I and others have authored alternative
legislation that should be considered by Congress – reforms that achieve meaningful long-term cost savings
while providing universal access to quality health care (see here). Each of our proposals, however, was
In the final bill passed by the Ways and Means Committee, Democrats insisted that a new government-run
health program be created. However, they voted against an amendment that would have required Members
of Congress to be enrolled in the new program – what’s good for the American people clearly isn’t good
enough for Democrats in Congress.
I have posted video of the debate on my YouTube Page. I have also blogged about the recent American
Medical Association decision to endorse the bill.
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
MAIL
Subject: Turn on the Pumps Act Killed
Date: 24-Jul-2009 06:38
Message Id: 4A6956D1.VIS.PO4.200.20000BB.1.2D6C1.1
Dear Friends,
Yesterday, House Democrats defeated my effort to force a vote on H.R.

3105 - the Turn on the Pumps Act
<http://nunes.house.gov/_files/HR3105.pdf> . The Speaker used a
procedural tactic to "table" my appeal for a vote - thus killing
consideration of my bill.
It is noteworthy that, despite the claims of bi-partisan support for

returning Delta pumping to normal operations, only three Democrats -
Rep. Griffith (D-Alabama), Rep. Kratovil (D-MA), and Rep. Minnick (ID)
supported my bill on the House Floor. Not a single California Democrat
voted in favor of the Turn on the Pumps Act (see how they voted).
<http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2009/roll616.xml> Meanwhile, communities
across the Central Valley face severe water shortages - shortages that
are also impacting Southern California.
A video of the floor proceedings can be found on my YouTube Channel by

clicking here. <http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Yesterday, House Democrats defeated my effort to force a vote on H.R. 3105 – the Turn on the Pumps Act
. The Speaker used a procedural tactic to “table” my appeal for a vote – thus killing consideration of my bill.
It is noteworthy that, despite the claims of bi-partisan support for returning Delta pumping to normal
operations, only three Democrats – Rep. Griffith (D-Alabama), Rep. Kratovil (D-MA), and Rep. Minnick
(ID) supported my bill on the House Floor. Not a single California Democrat voted in favor of the Turn on
the Pumps Act (see how they voted). Meanwhile, communities across the Central Valley face severe water
shortages – shortages that are also impacting Southern California.
A video of the floor proceedings can be found on my YouTube Channel by clicking here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: Sean Hannity Re-visits The Man-made Drought With Devin Nunes And Paul Rodriguez
Date: 11-Aug-2009 22:10
Message Id: 4A81EC5B.VIS.PO4.200.20000A2.1.3600B.1
Dear Friends,
Tonight, Sean Hannity again focused national attention on the government-imposed water crisis facing our state. Paul
Rodriguez joined me in a live interview from Huron to discuss the crisis. Video of the segment is available on my
YouTube Channel – click here <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InelCf0tMFI> .
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
If you would like to contact me, please visit my website at www.nunes.house.gov <http://www.nunes.house.gov/> . If you
would like to be removed from my mailing list, please send a message to LISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.GOV with the text
"SIGNOFF NEWSLETTER-CA21" in the body of the message.
<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes> <http://www.facebook.com/people/Devin-Nunes/1693459598>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Tonight, Sean Hannity again focused national attention on the government-imposed water crisis facing our
state. Paul Rodriguez joined me in a live interview from Huron to discuss the crisis. Video of the segment is
available on my YouTube Channel – click here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
MAIL
Subject: It's Fish Versus Farmers in the San Joaquin Valley - The Wall Street Journal
Date: 15-Aug-2009 14:06
Message Id: 4A86C0D1.VIS.PO4.200.20000CE.1.2A9B1.1
Dear Friends,
Today, The Wall Street Journal

<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB200014240529702046190045743186214821230
90.html> printed an opinion piece I authored concerning the
government-imposed water crisis facing California. A portion of the
article is included below.
You can read my entire opinion piece by visiting The Wall Street Journal
online (click here)
90.html> or by visiting my blog
<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/2009/08/its-fish-versus-farmers-in-san-j
oaquin.html> .
Thank you for your interest,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

It's Fish Versus Farmers in the San Joaquin Valley
By DEVIN NUNES
<http://online.wsj.com/SEARCH/SEARCH_CENTER.HTML?KEYWORDS=DEVIN+NUNES&AR
TICLESEARCHQUERY_PARSER=BYLINEAND>
San Joaquin Valley, Calif.
In 1931, a severe drought began that within a few years engulfed the
Oklahoma panhandle and a third of the Great Plains in a "Dust Bowl."
Tens of thousands of people fled the region-many traveling to California
along Route 66, which John Steinbeck called "the mother road, the road
of flight" in "The Grapes of Wrath."
A lot of the "Okies" settled in the San Joaquin Valley. In the decades
that followed, state and federal officials built dams and other
irrigation projects that helped turn the valley into some of the world's
richest farmland.
But today the San Joaquin Valley is being transformed into a dust bowl.
Hundreds of thousands of acres are fallow, while almond and plum trees
are being left to die in the scorching sun. Tens of thousands of people
have been tossed out of work-the town of Mendota alone has an
unemployment rate of about 40%-and the lines for food donations stretch
down streets. The reason? There isn't enough water to go around this
year, and the Obama administration is drawing up new reasons to divert
more of it from farms and people and into the San Francisco Bay.
Read the entire opinion piece by clicking here.

90.html>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Today, The Wall Street Journal printed an opinion piece I authored concerning the government-imposed
water crisis facing California. A portion of the article is included below.
You can read my entire opinion piece by visiting The Wall Street Journal online (click here) or by visiting
my blog.
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
It's Fish Versus Farmers in the San Joaquin Valley
By DEVIN NUNES
San Joaquin Valley, Calif.
In 1931, a severe drought began that within a few years engulfed the Oklahoma panhandle and a third of the
Great Plains in a "Dust Bowl." Tens of thousands of people fled the region—many traveling to California
along Route 66, which John Steinbeck called "the mother road, the road of flight" in "The Grapes of Wrath."
A lot of the "Okies" settled in the San Joaquin Valley. In the decades that followed, state and federal officials
built dams and other irrigation projects that helped turn the valley into some of the world's richest farmland.
But today the San Joaquin Valley is being transformed into a dust bowl. Hundreds of thousands of acres are
fallow, while almond and plum trees are being left to die in the scorching sun. Tens of thousands of people
have been tossed out of work—the town of Mendota alone has an unemployment rate of about 40%—and
the lines for food donations stretch down streets. The reason? There isn't enough water to go around this
year, and the Obama administration is drawing up new reasons to divert more of it from farms and people
and into the San Francisco Bay.
Read the entire opinion piece by clicking here.

MAIL
Subject: Sean Hannity Coming to Fresno - LIVE Broadcast From The Westside
Date: 11-Sep-2009 09:37
Message Id: 4AAA1A3D.VIS.PO4.200.2000095.1.2D6BA.1
Dear Friends,
On Thursday, September 17, Sean Hannity <http://www.hannity.com/> will be visiting the San Joaquin Valley for a live
broadcast. He will devote his entire program to the water crisis facing our state.
<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes#play/uploads/0/InelCf0tMFI>
It is important to give Sean a warm welcome and to thank him for his vigilant efforts to increase national awareness of the
man-made drought.
Details about the broadcast are below:
What: LIVE broadcast of the Sean Hannity Show
When: Thursday, September 17th, 2009
Time: Please arrive by 5:00 pm
Where: A fallowed field on the Westside in Fresno County
Directions: Located on the south side of Highway 198, to the west of the Fresno/Kings County line. The field is exactly 8
miles west of Lemoore Naval Air Station. The field is marked with a speed limit sign and a white wrought iron gate. The
area will also be clearly marked with signs and banners.
In addition to the Hannity broadcast next week, I would like to call your attention to several editorial responses recently
published by The Wall Street Journal. These responses (see below) relate to the Journal’s coverage of the water crisis as
well as my recent editorial.
They were written by Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar and Environmental Defense Fund Regional Director Laura
Harnish and highlight the challenges we face by exposing the people who are working to prevent a meaningful resolution.
It is noteworthy that Secretary Salazar again denies a man-made drought exists and Ms. Harnish believes that the root of
the problem is that farmers don’t pay enough for water.
Thank you for your interest and support.
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
would like to be removed from my mailing list, please send a message to LISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.GOV
<mailto:LISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.GOV> with the text "SIGNOFF NEWSLETTER-CA21" in the body of the message.
From The Wall Street Journal
Central Valley Water: Nor Any Drop for Plants to Drink
Your editorial "California's Man-Made Drought

<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204731804574384731898375624.html> " (Sept. 2) about the severe
drought and water crisis in California argues that California's water problems could be wished away if our nation were only
willing to sacrifice an endangered three-inch fish, turn on a few pumps to move water from Northern California to the
Central Valley, and wave a magic wand. The trouble is: The fish are a sliver of the problem, the pumps are already on,
and pointed fingers can't make it rain.
California's water crisis is far more troubling than your editorial suggests. The state is in its third year of a devastating
drought, caused by a lack of precipitation. In California's Central Valley, where half the nation's produce is grown, many
farms and fields are bone dry, unemployment has surged, and the state's inadequate water infrastructure—built 50 years
ago for a population half as large—cannot handle the stress. Moreover, California's Bay Delta, upon which 25 million
Californians depend for drinking water, is in a state of full environmental collapse.
As a proposed response, your editorial asks the Obama administration to ignore science and convene a so-called "God
Squad" that would override protections on watersheds and turn California's water crisis over to the courts. Trying to force
more water out of a dying system will only cause more human tragedy, while diverting attention from the governor and the
legislature, who face a Sept. 11 legislative deadline to decide whether to fix the broken water system in California after
decades of neglect.
Rather than more finger pointing, we need real solutions. After eight years on the sidelines, the federal government has
stepped in to help. The Obama administration is investing over $400 million through the president's economic recovery
plan to help modernize California's water infrastructure, including over $40 million in emergency assistance to help water-
short Central Valley farmers. We have helped move record amounts of water to communities in most need and are taking
steps to prepare for a potential fourth year of drought. And perhaps most importantly, the federal government is now
engaging as a full partner in the collaborative process that the governor launched two years ago to restore the Bay Delta,
and modernize the state's woefully outdated water infrastructure. Though what we need most is rain and snow to fill the
reservoirs, these actions will help mitigate the devastating impact of the ongoing drought and deliver help to the families
and communities suffering most.
This is the type of locally-driven, solution-oriented, collaborative approach that we must all support—and to which we must
all contribute.
Ken Salazar
Secretary of the Interior
Washington
It's not about fish, it's about market fairness. In California's water rights system, farmers on one side of the Central Valley
pay less than $10 for an acre-foot of water (enough water to cover an acre one-foot deep), while those on the other side
are forced to pay up to 60 times more—$600 an acre-foot—to keep trees alive.
What is needed is a new and fair set of market-based rules, created by water stakeholders and California's government,
that can spawn new industries and new jobs, while intelligently allocating the state's water to serve agriculture, cities and
suburbs, recreational users and nature.
Laura Harnish
Regional Director
Environmental Defense Fund
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
On Thursday, September 17, Sean Hannity will be visiting the San Joaquin Valley for a live broadcast. He
will devote his entire program to the water crisis facing our state.
It is important to give Sean a warm welcome and to thank him for his vigilant efforts to increase national
awareness of the man-made drought.
What: LIVE broadcast of the Sean Hannity Show
Directions: Located on the south side of Highway 198, to the west of the Fresno/Kings County line. The
field is exactly 8 miles west of Lemoore Naval Air Station. The field is marked with a speed limit sign and a
white wrought iron gate. The area will also be clearly marked with signs and banners.
In addition to the Hannity broadcast next week, I would like to call your attention to several editorial
responses recently published by The Wall Street Journal. These responses (see below) relate to the Journalâs
coverage of the water crisis as well as my recent editorial.
They were written by Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar and Environmental Defense Fund Regional
Director Laura Harnish and highlight the challenges we face by exposing the people who are working to
prevent a meaningful resolution.
It is noteworthy that Secretary Salazar again denies a man-made drought exists and Ms. Harnish believes that
the root of the problem is that farmers donât pay enough for water.
Thank you for your interest and support.
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
If you would like to contact me, please visit my website at www.nunes.house.gov. If you would like to be removed from
my mailing list, please send a message to LISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.GOV with the text "SIGNOFF NEWSLETTER-
CA21" in the body of the message.
From The Wall Street Journal
Central Valley Water: Nor Any Drop for Plants to Drink
Your editorial "California's Man-Made Drought" (Sept. 2) about the severe drought and water crisis in California
argues that California's water problems could be wished away if our nation were only willing to sacrifice an
endangered three-inch fish, turn on a few pumps to move water from Northern California to the Central Valley, and
wave a magic wand. The trouble is: The fish are a sliver of the problem, the pumps are already on, and pointed fingers
can't make it rain.
California's water crisis is far more troubling than your editorial suggests. The state is in its third year of a
devastating drought, caused by a lack of precipitation. In California's Central Valley, where half the nation's produce
is grown, many farms and fields are bone dry, unemployment has surged, and the state's inadequate water
infrastructureâbuilt 50 years ago for a population half as largeâcannot handle the stress. Moreover, California's Bay
Delta, upon which 25 million Californians depend for drinking water, is in a state of full environmental collapse.
As a proposed response, your editorial asks the Obama administration to ignore science and convene a so-called "God
Squad" that would override protections on watersheds and turn California's water crisis over to the courts. Trying to
force more water out of a dying system will only cause more human tragedy, while diverting attention from the
governor and the legislature, who face a Sept. 11 legislative deadline to decide whether to fix the broken water system
in California after decades of neglect.
Rather than more finger pointing, we need real solutions. After eight years on the sidelines, the federal government has
stepped in to help. The Obama administration is investing over $400 million through the president's economic
recovery plan to help modernize California's water infrastructure, including over $40 million in emergency assistance
to help water-short Central Valley farmers. We have helped move record amounts of water to communities in most
need and are taking steps to prepare for a potential fourth year of drought. And perhaps most importantly, the federal
government is now engaging as a full partner in the collaborative process that the governor launched two years ago to
restore the Bay Delta, and modernize the state's woefully outdated water infrastructure. Though what we need most is
rain and snow to fill the reservoirs, these actions will help mitigate the devastating impact of the ongoing drought and
deliver help to the families and communities suffering most.
This is the type of locally-driven, solution-oriented, collaborative approach that we must all supportâand to which we
must all contribute.
Ken Salazar
Secretary of the Interior
Washington
It's not about fish, it's about market fairness. In California's water rights system, farmers on one side of the Central
Valley pay less than $10 for an acre-foot of water (enough water to cover an acre one-foot deep), while those on the
other side are forced to pay up to 60 times moreâ$600 an acre-footâto keep trees alive.
What is needed is a new and fair set of market-based rules, created by water stakeholders and California's
government, that can spawn new industries and new jobs, while intelligently allocating the state's water to serve
agriculture, cities and suburbs, recreational users and nature.
Laura Harnish
Regional Director
Environmental Defense Fund
MAIL
Subject: Sean Hannity LIVE in Fresno TOMORROW and Emptying Reservoirs in the Middle of a Drought
Date: 16-Sep-2009 13:51
Message Id: 4AB0ED63.VIS.PO4.200.20000BA.1.1F139.1
Dear Friends,
This month, the American Spectator <http://spectator.org/> published an

excellent article by Max Schulz of the Manhattan Institute.
<http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/schulz.htm> In it he explains
the unbalanced environmental policies of our government and highlights
the man-made drought facing our state.
I hope you have a chance to read the Schulz article (see below) and
encourage you to pass it along to your friends and family.
In addition, don't forget that Sean Hannity <http://www.hannity.com/>

will be in our area tomorrow. He will be broadcasting FOX NEWS
CHANNEL'S HANNITY <http://www.foxnews.com/hannity/index.html> from the
Westside. This LIVE event will include Comedian/Activist Paul Rodriguez
and others (including myself).
It is important to give Sean a warm welcome and to thank him for his
vigilant efforts to increase national awareness of the man-made drought.
I hope you can make it!

What: LIVE broadcast of Hannity
Directions: Located on the south side of Highway 198, to the west of the
Fresno/Kings County line. The field is exactly 8 miles west of Lemoore
Naval Air Station. The field is marked with a speed limit sign and a
white wrought iron gate. The area will also be clearly marked with
signs and banners.
Thanks again for your support and interest.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

LISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.GOV <mailto:LISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.GOV> with the text
Emptying Reservoirs in the Middle of a Drought

<http://spectator.org/archives/2009/09/11/emptying-reservoirs-in-the-mid
>
By Max Schulz <http://spectator.org/people/max-schulz> from the

September 2009 <http://spectator.org/issues/september-2009> issue
ANYONE DOUBTING THAT OUR nation's environmental and economic policies

can get seriously out of whack from time to time need only look to the
Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. Located in California's Central
Valley, between the state's capital city and Stockton, it is where the
American, Mokelumne, Cosumnes, and Calaveras Rivers flow into the larger
Sacramento and San Joaquin. It is also where the saddest agricultural
saga since the Depression-era Dust Bowl is now playing, as the waters
from those rivers flow beneath San Francisco's Golden Gate Bridge and
out to sea. As they flow unimpeded to the Pacific, those waters are also
washing out to sea the livelihoods of tens of thousands of farm workers
and agricultural business owners. It is an economic as well as human
tragedy.
This is a story about water, about its lack as well as its abundance.
But it is also a story about the price we pay to protect the
environment, and whether we are striking the right balance between
nature and mankind. In the end, the question is whether people should
exercise dominion over nature, or whether nature should lord over man.
To most Americans, the answer is obvious: our capacity to make nature
subservient to our needs justifies doing so, insomuch as we act as
responsible stewards of the environment. But however obvious that might
be to most people, the countervailing idea-that nature should take
precedence over mankind-is being sown into a series of laws and
regulations that are causing undue torment and distress.
The American West was created, it is fair to say, by mankind taming

nature and using it for his own purpose. That is how the San Joaquin
Valley over time became the most productive agricultural region in the
world. Massive and expensive irrigation and public works projects
captured the waters in the San Joaquin River Delta to transform a desert
into a paradise, providing much of the fruits and vegetables and dairy
products Americans consume. Millions more acre-feet of water are
diverted each year to the state's coastal population centers from these
and other rivers, like the Colorado. By damming and diverting mighty
rivers, and reshaping the landscape all throughout the American West,
the federal government allowed Los Angeles, San Diego, and San Francisco
to bloom into the cities we know today.
That is the irony of California: a state that is Valhalla for
environmentalists and the home base for the green movement is an affront
to-and perversion of-nature. California is an artificially constructed
paradise. The Golden State owes its golden existence largely to mammoth
engineering feats representing mankind's ingenuity and triumph over the
natural realm. It's not just Hoover Dam, that wonder of the modern
world, but dozens of less famous man-made dams and lakes and reservoirs,
with names like Glen Canyon and Parker and Havasu and Link River, that
help reshape the landscape to provide water and power to California's
faraway population centers. The state could not sustain its giant cities
or its astoundingly fertile agricultural sector without them. Today's
California, that greenest of American states, is itself testimony to man
bending nature to his purpose.
NATURE, OR AT LEAST ITS SELF-STYLED advocates, is striking back. Its

cudgel is the federal Endangered Species Act and supporting California
statutes wielded on behalf of fish such as the tiny delta smelt. In
1993, the delta smelt was listed as threatened under the ESA. And with
that designation, litigious environmental groups went to court. Filing
lawsuit after lawsuit on behalf of this or that supposedly endangered
quarry, they aim to dismantle the infrastructure of California's State
Water Project (SWP) and the federal Central Valley Project (CVP). Those
two projects' dams, reservoirs, canals, waterways, aqueducts, and pumps
deliver the life-giving water supporting the state's agriculture and
supplying its major cities.
The greens have had some success. In 2007, U.S. district judge Oliver
Wanger ruled that the pumping that annually sent about 6 million
acre-feet of water to Kern County and beyond was threatening the delta
smelt's existence by disrupting water flows for the fall spawning
season. Citing the protections accorded by the Endangered Species Act,
he ordered pumping for agricultural uses curtailed by one-third until
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service could evaluate the situation. After
studying the issue for more than a year, the USFWS determined last
December that pumping by the SWP and CVP "was likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of the delta smelt and adversely modify its critical
habitat." The agency issued plans to keep Judge Wanger's restrictions in
place. According to Tulare County supervisor Allen Ishida, "California
was forced to let 660,000 acrefeet of its freshwater supplies run out to
the ocean. That was enough water to supply the entire Silicon Valley for
two years."
Further curbs may come, on behalf of the delta smelt as well as other
species. The USFWS and the California Fish and Game Commission are
moving forward with threatened and endangered designations for Chinook
salmon, steelhead, and the longfin smelt, presaging further water
reductions for agriculture.
The result of these irrigation pump shutdowns is that hundreds of

thousands of acres of farmland are being forced out of production. Kern
County authorities estimated that 145,000 of the 850,000 acres that are
typically irrigated were idled or under-irrigated last year. The loss
was pegged at $100 million in the county alone. A study by UC-Davis
estimated San Joaquin Valley farm revenue losses to range from $482
million to $647 million. Total California agricultural economic losses
could hit $3 billion this year.
But those are just abstract financial numbers. Behind those figures are
real people, farmers and business owners and families who are losing
livelihoods and are being forced to uproot and flee. The UC-Davis study
conservatively suggested 24,000 to 32,000 Central Valley jobs were
destroyed by environmental rulings designed to protect endangered
wildlife. It further estimated job losses could approach 80,000 or more
if restrictions intensified. Communities are withering for a
government-imposed lack of water. It is little exaggeration to say that
the farmers of the most valuable farming region in the nation are facing
extinction.
IS THAT WHAT THE Endangered Species Act was designed to accomplish? In

the 36 years since President Nixon signed the ESA into law (its chief
congressional sponsors were Rep. John Dingell, D-MI, and the future
Abscam crook, Sen. Harrison Williams, D-NJ), an entire federal and state
government apparatus has sprung forth to provide protections to
creatures like the bald eagle and the grizzly bear. More than 1,300
species of animals, fish, and plants have been designated either
"endangered" or "threatened." Certainly, there have been some
preservation successes, notably with iconic animals like our national
bird or Smoky the Bear's cousins.
But while the bald eagle and the grizzly are the poster children of ESA
protection, they are the exception and not the rule. Most species for
whose preservation the power of government has been harnessed are ones
whose loss few would mourn, or even notice. How many tears, for
instance, would be shed if the rock gnome lichen disappeared, not to
mention the dwarf wedgemussel or the Comal Springs dryopid beetle? Or
the delta smelt? And yet court decisions and other regulatory moves are
being made on behalf of these and other creatures in ways that present
significant hardship for landowners. Whether depriving Central Valley
farmers of contractually entitled water or placing restrictions on
landowners' use of their own properties, endangered species regulations
end up hamstringing humans for the benefit of certain plants, fish, and
animals that few have heard of and even fewer care about.
Sometimes such hamstringing is merely a costly irritant. Case Western

Reserve University law professor Jonathan Adler has noted, "Under the
ESA, individual Americans have been prevented from building homes,
plowing fields, cutting trees, clearing brush, and repairing fences-all
on private land."
In other instances, it can be tragic. According to Adler, "The federal

government has even barred private landowners from clearing firebreaks
to protect their homes from fire hazards." In 1993, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service forbade residents of California's Riverside County from
clearing firebreaks around their homes for fear of disturbing the
endangered Stephens' kangaroo rat (despite the fact state authorities
required them to do so as a fire protection measure). When wildfires
whipped through the Southern California community, nearly two dozen
homes were destroyed. The case of the Central Valley farmers is a
similar-and needless-calamity.
The problem, says Tulare County's Ishida, is not the courts or even
activist judges. "The problem is the courts are being forced to base
their decisions on laws that have not been amended or changed in
decades. The environmentalists have skillfully used such laws as the
Central Valley Project Improvement Act and the Endangered Species Act so
that judges have no alternative but to order massive releases of water."
Ishida recently told a congressional panel that since the passage of the
Central Valley Project Improvement Act in 1992 (roughly the same time
that the delta smelt was listed as threatened), the state of California
has redirected more than 3 million acre-feet of water that used to serve
cities and farms. Now that water supports fisheries and habitats. Often
it just goes out to sea, completely unused for any of the many purposes
for which a thirsty state is desperate to use it.
As California farmers lose their jobs by the tens of thousands to

protect a tiny fish, the sad irony is that the delta smelt may not be
faring much better. That's not because of inadequate protections against
humans offered by state and federal officials, but rather because those
officials seem incapable of saving the delta smelt from nature's
predators. The smelt rarely grows much longer than three inches, and it
is prey for any number of other creatures that inhabit the rivers of the
San Joaquin Valley. As Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA), noted at a recent
congressional hearing, the water diversions have not helped the delta
smelt populations. There are quite a few officials who believe that the
delta smelt is on Darwin's fast track to extinction, despite the
feel-good efforts of human environmentalists. McClintock's congressional
colleague, George Radanovich, is even rooting it on, calling the smelt
"a worthless little worm that needs to go the way of the dinosaur."
For their part, environmentalists who sue on behalf of the delta smelt
consider the tiny fish to be an absolutely critical part of the food
chain, feeding on plankton and in turn serving as food for larger fish
and birds. If the delta smelt disappears, they warn ominously, the local
food chain collapses. Whether that's true or not, what the policies boil
down to should be a matter of picking your calamity: should the fish
(and others in the food chain) suffer, or should humans?
PERHAPS THE MOST MYSTIFYING ELEMENT of California's farms-versus-fish

imbroglio is the unwillingness of the media and the state's political
establishment (other than the elected representatives of the region) to
confront the issue head-on. Sidestepping the tough questions involved,
they refer instead to California's lengthy drought as the cause of much
of the state's misfortune.
"California is in its third year of drought, and many farmers in the

state's crop-rich Central Valley are looking at dusty fields, or worse,
are cutting down their orchards before the trees die," according to
National Public Radio in a report typical of the media coverage. "This
year, farmers have been told they are getting only a small fraction of
the water they need." The alarm over California's drought spread on both
coasts. In Sacramento, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger declared a state of
emergency, while in Washington Congress held hearings at which Democrats
decried "California's Katrina."
Not surprisingly, global warming is being blamed for California's

drought. California's drought was regularly invoked on Capitol Hill as
Congress debated cap and trade legislation this summer. Energy Secretary
Steven Chu gave this storyline a boost in February when he warned that
drought will cause California's vineyards and farms to vanish by the end
of the 21st century if we fail to combat warming. "We're looking at a
scenario where there's no more agriculture in California," he told the
Los Angeles Times.
The only problem with the idea of drought driving California's misery is
that it is largely a fiction. There has been very mild drought in recent
years, but not enough to account for the current massive cuts in water
to Central Valley farmers. This spring, the state's Department of Water
Resources revealed that the mountain snowpack feeding California
reservoirs was at 80 percent of normal levels, while precipitation in
the northern and southern Sierra was 90 percent of average. This
prompted California's chief hydrologist to tell reporters writing about
the supposedly epic conditions that while, sure, there had been some
drought, it was "not the worst we ever had." By the conventional
definitions his office employs, he said, 2007 and 2008 barely qualified
as drought years at all.
Drought isn't the reason the Central Valley's farmers aren't getting
water. "There's plenty of water," says congressman Devin Nunes, a
Republican who represents part of the Central Valley. "But the courts
say it can't be touched, so it's flowing out to sea under the Golden
Gate Bridge."
The false drought meme has conveniently allowed policy makers as well as
the media to sidestep the uncomfortable issues surrounding Endangered
Species Act regulation. It permits them to avoid confronting what Nunes
refers to as "the fundamental wrongness of choosing fish over people."
And it permits them to avoid taking responsibility for the consequences
of government policies and regulations that have tremendously adverse
impacts on ordinary people's lives. When cornered, blame the weather.
DURING THE 1930s, the Dust Bowl tragedy pitted hapless farmers against
the vagaries of weather and climate, as the Great Plains endured a
horrific seven-year drought the likes of which no one could recall.
California, too, has suffered drought in recent years. No one denies
that. Yet however much the drought gets blamed for so many of the
state's problems, the disaster unfolding in the Central Valley is almost
entirely man-made. Fields lie fallow. Families in some of America's
richest cropland face crushing poverty. Businesses go belly-up. The fact
that this is spurred by government policies designed to protect
endangered species from dying off is an irony tinged with tragedy.
Missing in this sad affair has been any element of common sense. But
that may be changing. In response this summer to an appeal of the last
year's Fish and Wildlife Service ruling, Judge Wanger signaled a change
of course. He hinted that the USFWS's decision supporting the shutting
off of pumps to Central Valley farmers (not to mention his initial order
to do so) may have erred by not taking into account the impact on the
human populations. As the issue winds its way through the courts, it
remains to be seen whether Judge Wanger's newfound logic holds up. If
so, there may be protection for the endangered farmer after all.
Max Schulz is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
This month, the American Spectator published an excellent article by Max Schulz of the Manhattan Institute.
In it he explains the unbalanced environmental policies of our government and highlights the man-made
drought facing our state.
I hope you have a chance to read the Schulz article (see below) and encourage you to pass it along to your
friends and family.
In addition, don’t forget that Sean Hannity will be in our area tomorrow. He will be broadcasting FOX
NEWS CHANNEL’S HANNITY from the Westside. This LIVE event will include Comedian/Activist Paul
Rodriguez and others (including myself).
awareness of the man-made drought. I hope you can make it!

Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
By Max Schulz from the September 2009 issue
ANYONE DOUBTING THAT OUR nation's environmental and economic policies can get seriously out of
whack from time to time need only look to the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. Located in California's
Central Valley, between the state's capital city and Stockton, it is where the American, Mokelumne,
Cosumnes, and Calaveras Rivers flow into the larger Sacramento and San Joaquin. It is also where the
saddest agricultural saga since the Depression-era Dust Bowl is now playing, as the waters from those rivers
flow beneath San Francisco's Golden Gate Bridge and out to sea. As they flow unimpeded to the Pacific,
those waters are also washing out to sea the livelihoods of tens of thousands of farm workers and agricultural
business owners. It is an economic as well as human tragedy.
This is a story about water, about its lack as well as its abundance. But it is also a story about the price we
pay to protect the environment, and whether we are striking the right balance between nature and mankind.
In the end, the question is whether people should exercise dominion over nature, or whether nature should
lord over man. To most Americans, the answer is obvious: our capacity to make nature subservient to our
needs justifies doing so, insomuch as we act as responsible stewards of the environment. But however
obvious that might be to most people, the countervailing idea—that nature should take precedence over
mankind—is being sown into a series of laws and regulations that are causing undue torment and distress.
The American West was created, it is fair to say, by mankind taming nature and using it for his own purpose.
That is how the San Joaquin Valley over time became the most productive agricultural region in the world.
Massive and expensive irrigation and public works projects captured the waters in the San Joaquin River
Delta to transform a desert into a paradise, providing much of the fruits and vegetables and dairy products
Americans consume. Millions more acre-feet of water are diverted each year to the state's coastal population
centers from these and other rivers, like the Colorado. By damming and diverting mighty rivers, and
reshaping the landscape all throughout the American West, the federal government allowed Los Angeles,
San Diego, and San Francisco to bloom into the cities we know today.
That is the irony of California: a state that is Valhalla for environmentalists and the home base for the green
movement is an affront to—and perversion of—nature. California is an artificially constructed paradise. The
Golden State owes its golden existence largely to mammoth engineering feats representing mankind's
ingenuity and triumph over the natural realm. It's not just Hoover Dam, that wonder of the modern world,
but dozens of less famous man-made dams and lakes and reservoirs, with names like Glen Canyon and
Parker and Havasu and Link River, that help reshape the landscape to provide water and power to
California's faraway population centers. The state could not sustain its giant cities or its astoundingly fertile
agricultural sector without them. Today's California, that greenest of American states, is itself testimony to
man bending nature to his purpose.
NATURE, OR AT LEAST ITS SELF-STYLED advocates, is striking back. Its cudgel is the federal
Endangered Species Act and supporting California statutes wielded on behalf of fish such as the tiny delta
smelt. In 1993, the delta smelt was listed as threatened under the ESA. And with that designation, litigious
environmental groups went to court. Filing lawsuit after lawsuit on behalf of this or that supposedly
endangered quarry, they aim to dismantle the infrastructure of California's State Water Project (SWP) and
the federal Central Valley Project (CVP). Those two projects' dams, reservoirs, canals, waterways,
aqueducts, and pumps deliver the life-giving water supporting the state's agriculture and supplying its major
cities.
The greens have had some success. In 2007, U.S. district judge Oliver Wanger ruled that the pumping that
annually sent about 6 million acre-feet of water to Kern County and beyond was threatening the delta smelt's
existence by disrupting water flows for the fall spawning season. Citing the protections accorded by the
Endangered Species Act, he ordered pumping for agricultural uses curtailed by one-third until the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service could evaluate the situation. After studying the issue for more than a year, the USFWS
determined last December that pumping by the SWP and CVP "was likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of the delta smelt and adversely modify its critical habitat." The agency issued plans to keep Judge
Wanger's restrictions in place. According to Tulare County supervisor Allen Ishida, "California was forced
to let 660,000 acrefeet of its freshwater supplies run out to the ocean. That was enough water to supply the
entire Silicon Valley for two years."
Further curbs may come, on behalf of the delta smelt as well as other species. The USFWS and the
California Fish and Game Commission are moving forward with threatened and endangered designations for
Chinook salmon, steelhead, and the longfin smelt, presaging further water reductions for agriculture.
The result of these irrigation pump shutdowns is that hundreds of thousands of acres of farmland are being
forced out of production. Kern County authorities estimated that 145,000 of the 850,000 acres that are
typically irrigated were idled or under-irrigated last year. The loss was pegged at $100 million in the county
alone. A study by UC-Davis estimated San Joaquin Valley farm revenue losses to range from $482 million
to $647 million. Total California agricultural economic losses could hit $3 billion this year.
But those are just abstract financial numbers. Behind those figures are real people, farmers and business
owners and families who are losing livelihoods and are being forced to uproot and flee. The UC-Davis study
conservatively suggested 24,000 to 32,000 Central Valley jobs were destroyed by environmental rulings
designed to protect endangered wildlife. It further estimated job losses could approach 80,000 or more if
restrictions intensified. Communities are withering for a government-imposed lack of water. It is little
exaggeration to say that the farmers of the most valuable farming region in the nation are facing extinction.
IS THAT WHAT THE Endangered Species Act was designed to accomplish? In the 36 years since President
Nixon signed the ESA into law (its chief congressional sponsors were Rep. John Dingell, D-MI, and the
future Abscam crook, Sen. Harrison Williams, D-NJ), an entire federal and state government apparatus has
sprung forth to provide protections to creatures like the bald eagle and the grizzly bear. More than 1,300
species of animals, fish, and plants have been designated either "endangered" or "threatened." Certainly,
there have been some preservation successes, notably with iconic animals like our national bird or Smoky
the Bear's cousins.
But while the bald eagle and the grizzly are the poster children of ESA protection, they are the exception and
not the rule. Most species for whose preservation the power of government has been harnessed are ones
whose loss few would mourn, or even notice. How many tears, for instance, would be shed if the rock gnome
lichen disappeared, not to mention the dwarf wedgemussel or the Comal Springs dryopid beetle? Or the delta
smelt? And yet court decisions and other regulatory moves are being made on behalf of these and other
creatures in ways that present significant hardship for landowners. Whether depriving Central Valley farmers
of contractually entitled water or placing restrictions on landowners' use of their own properties, endangered
species regulations end up hamstringing humans for the benefit of certain plants, fish, and animals that few
have heard of and even fewer care about.
Sometimes such hamstringing is merely a costly irritant. Case Western Reserve University law professor
Jonathan Adler has noted, "Under the ESA, individual Americans have been prevented from building homes,
plowing fields, cutting trees, clearing brush, and repairing fences—all on private land."
In other instances, it can be tragic. According to Adler, "The federal government has even barred private
landowners from clearing firebreaks to protect their homes from fire hazards." In 1993, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service forbade residents of California's Riverside County from clearing firebreaks around their
homes for fear of disturbing the endangered Stephens' kangaroo rat (despite the fact state authorities required
them to do so as a fire protection measure). When wildfires whipped through the Southern California
community, nearly two dozen homes were destroyed. The case of the Central Valley farmers is a similar—
and needless—calamity.
The problem, says Tulare County's Ishida, is not the courts or even activist judges. "The problem is the
courts are being forced to base their decisions on laws that have not been amended or changed in decades.
The environmentalists have skillfully used such laws as the Central Valley Project Improvement Act and the
Endangered Species Act so that judges have no alternative but to order massive releases of water."
Ishida recently told a congressional panel that since the passage of the Central Valley Project Improvement
Act in 1992 (roughly the same time that the delta smelt was listed as threatened), the state of California has
redirected more than 3 million acre-feet of water that used to serve cities and farms. Now that water supports
fisheries and habitats. Often it just goes out to sea, completely unused for any of the many purposes for
which a thirsty state is desperate to use it.
As California farmers lose their jobs by the tens of thousands to protect a tiny fish, the sad irony is that the
delta smelt may not be faring much better. That's not because of inadequate protections against humans
offered by state and federal officials, but rather because those officials seem incapable of saving the delta
smelt from nature's predators. The smelt rarely grows much longer than three inches, and it is prey for any
number of other creatures that inhabit the rivers of the San Joaquin Valley. As Rep. Tom McClintock (R-
CA), noted at a recent congressional hearing, the water diversions have not helped the delta smelt
populations. There are quite a few officials who believe that the delta smelt is on Darwin's fast track to
extinction, despite the feel-good efforts of human environmentalists. McClintock's congressional colleague,
George Radanovich, is even rooting it on, calling the smelt "a worthless little worm that needs to go the way
of the dinosaur."
For their part, environmentalists who sue on behalf of the delta smelt consider the tiny fish to be an
absolutely critical part of the food chain, feeding on plankton and in turn serving as food for larger fish and
birds. If the delta smelt disappears, they warn ominously, the local food chain collapses. Whether that's true
or not, what the policies boil down to should be a matter of picking your calamity: should the fish (and
others in the food chain) suffer, or should humans?
PERHAPS THE MOST MYSTIFYING ELEMENT of California's farms-versus-fish imbroglio is the

unwillingness of the media and the state's political establishment (other than the elected representatives of
the region) to confront the issue head-on. Sidestepping the tough questions involved, they refer instead to
California's lengthy drought as the cause of much of the state's misfortune.
"California is in its third year of drought, and many farmers in the state's crop-rich Central Valley are
looking at dusty fields, or worse, are cutting down their orchards before the trees die," according to National
Public Radio in a report typical of the media coverage. "This year, farmers have been told they are getting
only a small fraction of the water they need." The alarm over California's drought spread on both coasts. In
Sacramento, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger declared a state of emergency, while in Washington Congress
held hearings at which Democrats decried "California's Katrina."
Not surprisingly, global warming is being blamed for California's drought. California's drought was regularly
invoked on Capitol Hill as Congress debated cap and trade legislation this summer. Energy Secretary Steven
Chu gave this storyline a boost in February when he warned that drought will cause California's vineyards
and farms to vanish by the end of the 21st century if we fail to combat warming. "We're looking at a scenario
where there's no more agriculture in California," he told the Los Angeles Times.
The only problem with the idea of drought driving California's misery is that it is largely a fiction. There has
been very mild drought in recent years, but not enough to account for the current massive cuts in water to
Central Valley farmers. This spring, the state's Department of Water Resources revealed that the mountain
snowpack feeding California reservoirs was at 80 percent of normal levels, while precipitation in the
northern and southern Sierra was 90 percent of average. This prompted California's chief hydrologist to tell
reporters writing about the supposedly epic conditions that while, sure, there had been some drought, it was
"not the worst we ever had." By the conventional definitions his office employs, he said, 2007 and 2008
barely qualified as drought years at all.
Drought isn't the reason the Central Valley's farmers aren't getting water. "There's plenty of water," says
congressman Devin Nunes, a Republican who represents part of the Central Valley. "But the courts say it
can't be touched, so it's flowing out to sea under the Golden Gate Bridge."
The false drought meme has conveniently allowed policy makers as well as the media to sidestep the
uncomfortable issues surrounding Endangered Species Act regulation. It permits them to avoid confronting
what Nunes refers to as "the fundamental wrongness of choosing fish over people." And it permits them to
avoid taking responsibility for the consequences of government policies and regulations that have
tremendously adverse impacts on ordinary people's lives. When cornered, blame the weather.
DURING THE 1930s, the Dust Bowl tragedy pitted hapless farmers against the vagaries of weather and
climate, as the Great Plains endured a horrific seven-year drought the likes of which no one could recall.
California, too, has suffered drought in recent years. No one denies that. Yet however much the drought gets
blamed for so many of the state's problems, the disaster unfolding in the Central Valley is almost entirely
man-made. Fields lie fallow. Families in some of America's richest cropland face crushing poverty.
Businesses go belly-up. The fact that this is spurred by government policies designed to protect endangered
species from dying off is an irony tinged with tragedy.
Missing in this sad affair has been any element of common sense. But that may be changing. In response this
summer to an appeal of the last year's Fish and Wildlife Service ruling, Judge Wanger signaled a change of
course. He hinted that the USFWS's decision supporting the shutting off of pumps to Central Valley farmers
(not to mention his initial order to do so) may have erred by not taking into account the impact on the human
populations. As the issue winds its way through the courts, it remains to be seen whether Judge Wanger's
newfound logic holds up. If so, there may be protection for the endangered farmer after all.
Max Schulzis a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.

MAIL
Subject: Sean Hannity LIVE in Fresno TOMORROW and Emptying Reservoirs in the Middle of a Drought
Date: 16-Sep-2009 13:50
Message Id: 4AB0ED3B.VIS.PO4.200.20000B4.1.1AA52.1
Dear Friends,
This month, the American Spectator <http://spectator.org/> published an

excellent article by Max Schulz of the Manhattan Institute.
<http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/schulz.htm> In it he explains
the unbalanced environmental policies of our government and highlights
the man-made drought facing our state.
I hope you have a chance to read the Schulz article (see below) and
encourage you to pass it along to your friends and family.
In addition, don't forget that Sean Hannity <http://www.hannity.com/>

will be in our area tomorrow. He will be broadcasting FOX NEWS
CHANNEL'S HANNITY <http://www.foxnews.com/hannity/index.html> from the
Westside. This LIVE event will include Comedian/Activist Paul Rodriguez
and others (including myself).
It is important to give Sean a warm welcome and to thank him for his
vigilant efforts to increase national awareness of the man-made drought.
I hope you can make it!

Directions: Located on the south side of Highway 198, to the west of the
Fresno/Kings County line. The field is exactly 8 miles west of Lemoore
Naval Air Station. The field is marked with a speed limit sign and a
white wrought iron gate. The area will also be clearly marked with
signs and banners.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

LISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.GOV <mailto:LISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.GOV> with the text

<http://spectator.org/archives/2009/09/11/emptying-reservoirs-in-the-mid
>
By Max Schulz <http://spectator.org/people/max-schulz> from the
September 2009 <http://spectator.org/issues/september-2009> issue
ANYONE DOUBTING THAT OUR nation's environmental and economic policies

can get seriously out of whack from time to time need only look to the
Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. Located in California's Central
Valley, between the state's capital city and Stockton, it is where the
American, Mokelumne, Cosumnes, and Calaveras Rivers flow into the larger
Sacramento and San Joaquin. It is also where the saddest agricultural
saga since the Depression-era Dust Bowl is now playing, as the waters
from those rivers flow beneath San Francisco's Golden Gate Bridge and
out to sea. As they flow unimpeded to the Pacific, those waters are also
washing out to sea the livelihoods of tens of thousands of farm workers
and agricultural business owners. It is an economic as well as human
tragedy.
This is a story about water, about its lack as well as its abundance.
But it is also a story about the price we pay to protect the
environment, and whether we are striking the right balance between
nature and mankind. In the end, the question is whether people should
exercise dominion over nature, or whether nature should lord over man.
To most Americans, the answer is obvious: our capacity to make nature
subservient to our needs justifies doing so, insomuch as we act as
responsible stewards of the environment. But however obvious that might
be to most people, the countervailing idea-that nature should take
precedence over mankind-is being sown into a series of laws and
regulations that are causing undue torment and distress.
The American West was created, it is fair to say, by mankind taming

nature and using it for his own purpose. That is how the San Joaquin
Valley over time became the most productive agricultural region in the
world. Massive and expensive irrigation and public works projects
captured the waters in the San Joaquin River Delta to transform a desert
into a paradise, providing much of the fruits and vegetables and dairy
products Americans consume. Millions more acre-feet of water are
diverted each year to the state's coastal population centers from these
and other rivers, like the Colorado. By damming and diverting mighty
rivers, and reshaping the landscape all throughout the American West,
the federal government allowed Los Angeles, San Diego, and San Francisco
to bloom into the cities we know today.
That is the irony of California: a state that is Valhalla for

environmentalists and the home base for the green movement is an affront
to-and perversion of-nature. California is an artificially constructed
paradise. The Golden State owes its golden existence largely to mammoth
engineering feats representing mankind's ingenuity and triumph over the
natural realm. It's not just Hoover Dam, that wonder of the modern
world, but dozens of less famous man-made dams and lakes and reservoirs,
with names like Glen Canyon and Parker and Havasu and Link River, that
help reshape the landscape to provide water and power to California's
faraway population centers. The state could not sustain its giant cities
or its astoundingly fertile agricultural sector without them. Today's
California, that greenest of American states, is itself testimony to man
bending nature to his purpose.
NATURE, OR AT LEAST ITS SELF-STYLED advocates, is striking back. Its

cudgel is the federal Endangered Species Act and supporting California
statutes wielded on behalf of fish such as the tiny delta smelt. In
1993, the delta smelt was listed as threatened under the ESA. And with
that designation, litigious environmental groups went to court. Filing
lawsuit after lawsuit on behalf of this or that supposedly endangered
quarry, they aim to dismantle the infrastructure of California's State
Water Project (SWP) and the federal Central Valley Project (CVP). Those
two projects' dams, reservoirs, canals, waterways, aqueducts, and pumps
deliver the life-giving water supporting the state's agriculture and
supplying its major cities.
The greens have had some success. In 2007, U.S. district judge Oliver
Wanger ruled that the pumping that annually sent about 6 million
acre-feet of water to Kern County and beyond was threatening the delta
smelt's existence by disrupting water flows for the fall spawning
season. Citing the protections accorded by the Endangered Species Act,
he ordered pumping for agricultural uses curtailed by one-third until
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service could evaluate the situation. After
studying the issue for more than a year, the USFWS determined last
December that pumping by the SWP and CVP "was likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of the delta smelt and adversely modify its critical
habitat." The agency issued plans to keep Judge Wanger's restrictions in
place. According to Tulare County supervisor Allen Ishida, "California
was forced to let 660,000 acrefeet of its freshwater supplies run out to
the ocean. That was enough water to supply the entire Silicon Valley for
two years."
Further curbs may come, on behalf of the delta smelt as well as other
species. The USFWS and the California Fish and Game Commission are
moving forward with threatened and endangered designations for Chinook
salmon, steelhead, and the longfin smelt, presaging further water
reductions for agriculture.
The result of these irrigation pump shutdowns is that hundreds of

thousands of acres of farmland are being forced out of production. Kern
County authorities estimated that 145,000 of the 850,000 acres that are
typically irrigated were idled or under-irrigated last year. The loss
was pegged at $100 million in the county alone. A study by UC-Davis
estimated San Joaquin Valley farm revenue losses to range from $482
million to $647 million. Total California agricultural economic losses
could hit $3 billion this year.
But those are just abstract financial numbers. Behind those figures are
real people, farmers and business owners and families who are losing
livelihoods and are being forced to uproot and flee. The UC-Davis study
conservatively suggested 24,000 to 32,000 Central Valley jobs were
destroyed by environmental rulings designed to protect endangered
wildlife. It further estimated job losses could approach 80,000 or more
if restrictions intensified. Communities are withering for a
government-imposed lack of water. It is little exaggeration to say that
the farmers of the most valuable farming region in the nation are facing
extinction.
IS THAT WHAT THE Endangered Species Act was designed to accomplish? In

the 36 years since President Nixon signed the ESA into law (its chief
congressional sponsors were Rep. John Dingell, D-MI, and the future
Abscam crook, Sen. Harrison Williams, D-NJ), an entire federal and state
government apparatus has sprung forth to provide protections to
creatures like the bald eagle and the grizzly bear. More than 1,300
species of animals, fish, and plants have been designated either
"endangered" or "threatened." Certainly, there have been some
preservation successes, notably with iconic animals like our national
bird or Smoky the Bear's cousins.
But while the bald eagle and the grizzly are the poster children of ESA
protection, they are the exception and not the rule. Most species for
whose preservation the power of government has been harnessed are ones
whose loss few would mourn, or even notice. How many tears, for
instance, would be shed if the rock gnome lichen disappeared, not to
mention the dwarf wedgemussel or the Comal Springs dryopid beetle? Or
the delta smelt? And yet court decisions and other regulatory moves are
being made on behalf of these and other creatures in ways that present
significant hardship for landowners. Whether depriving Central Valley
farmers of contractually entitled water or placing restrictions on
landowners' use of their own properties, endangered species regulations
end up hamstringing humans for the benefit of certain plants, fish, and
animals that few have heard of and even fewer care about.
Sometimes such hamstringing is merely a costly irritant. Case Western

Reserve University law professor Jonathan Adler has noted, "Under the
ESA, individual Americans have been prevented from building homes,
plowing fields, cutting trees, clearing brush, and repairing fences-all
on private land."
In other instances, it can be tragic. According to Adler, "The federal

government has even barred private landowners from clearing firebreaks
to protect their homes from fire hazards." In 1993, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service forbade residents of California's Riverside County from
clearing firebreaks around their homes for fear of disturbing the
endangered Stephens' kangaroo rat (despite the fact state authorities
required them to do so as a fire protection measure). When wildfires
whipped through the Southern California community, nearly two dozen
homes were destroyed. The case of the Central Valley farmers is a
similar-and needless-calamity.
The problem, says Tulare County's Ishida, is not the courts or even
activist judges. "The problem is the courts are being forced to base
their decisions on laws that have not been amended or changed in
decades. The environmentalists have skillfully used such laws as the
Central Valley Project Improvement Act and the Endangered Species Act so
that judges have no alternative but to order massive releases of water."
Ishida recently told a congressional panel that since the passage of the
Central Valley Project Improvement Act in 1992 (roughly the same time
that the delta smelt was listed as threatened), the state of California
has redirected more than 3 million acre-feet of water that used to serve
cities and farms. Now that water supports fisheries and habitats. Often
it just goes out to sea, completely unused for any of the many purposes
for which a thirsty state is desperate to use it.
As California farmers lose their jobs by the tens of thousands to

protect a tiny fish, the sad irony is that the delta smelt may not be
faring much better. That's not because of inadequate protections against
humans offered by state and federal officials, but rather because those
officials seem incapable of saving the delta smelt from nature's
predators. The smelt rarely grows much longer than three inches, and it
is prey for any number of other creatures that inhabit the rivers of the
San Joaquin Valley. As Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA), noted at a recent
congressional hearing, the water diversions have not helped the delta
smelt populations. There are quite a few officials who believe that the
delta smelt is on Darwin's fast track to extinction, despite the
feel-good efforts of human environmentalists. McClintock's congressional
colleague, George Radanovich, is even rooting it on, calling the smelt
"a worthless little worm that needs to go the way of the dinosaur."
For their part, environmentalists who sue on behalf of the delta smelt
consider the tiny fish to be an absolutely critical part of the food
chain, feeding on plankton and in turn serving as food for larger fish
and birds. If the delta smelt disappears, they warn ominously, the local
food chain collapses. Whether that's true or not, what the policies boil
down to should be a matter of picking your calamity: should the fish
(and others in the food chain) suffer, or should humans?
PERHAPS THE MOST MYSTIFYING ELEMENT of California's farms-versus-fish

imbroglio is the unwillingness of the media and the state's political
establishment (other than the elected representatives of the region) to
confront the issue head-on. Sidestepping the tough questions involved,
they refer instead to California's lengthy drought as the cause of much
of the state's misfortune.
"California is in its third year of drought, and many farmers in the

state's crop-rich Central Valley are looking at dusty fields, or worse,
are cutting down their orchards before the trees die," according to
National Public Radio in a report typical of the media coverage. "This
year, farmers have been told they are getting only a small fraction of
the water they need." The alarm over California's drought spread on both
coasts. In Sacramento, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger declared a state of
emergency, while in Washington Congress held hearings at which Democrats
decried "California's Katrina."
Not surprisingly, global warming is being blamed for California's

drought. California's drought was regularly invoked on Capitol Hill as
Congress debated cap and trade legislation this summer. Energy Secretary
Steven Chu gave this storyline a boost in February when he warned that
drought will cause California's vineyards and farms to vanish by the end
of the 21st century if we fail to combat warming. "We're looking at a
scenario where there's no more agriculture in California," he told the
Los Angeles Times.
The only problem with the idea of drought driving California's misery is
that it is largely a fiction. There has been very mild drought in recent
years, but not enough to account for the current massive cuts in water
to Central Valley farmers. This spring, the state's Department of Water
Resources revealed that the mountain snowpack feeding California
reservoirs was at 80 percent of normal levels, while precipitation in
the northern and southern Sierra was 90 percent of average. This
prompted California's chief hydrologist to tell reporters writing about
the supposedly epic conditions that while, sure, there had been some
drought, it was "not the worst we ever had." By the conventional
definitions his office employs, he said, 2007 and 2008 barely qualified
as drought years at all.
Drought isn't the reason the Central Valley's farmers aren't getting
water. "There's plenty of water," says congressman Devin Nunes, a
Republican who represents part of the Central Valley. "But the courts
say it can't be touched, so it's flowing out to sea under the Golden
Gate Bridge."
The false drought meme has conveniently allowed policy makers as well as
the media to sidestep the uncomfortable issues surrounding Endangered
Species Act regulation. It permits them to avoid confronting what Nunes
refers to as "the fundamental wrongness of choosing fish over people."
And it permits them to avoid taking responsibility for the consequences
of government policies and regulations that have tremendously adverse
impacts on ordinary people's lives. When cornered, blame the weather.
DURING THE 1930s, the Dust Bowl tragedy pitted hapless farmers against
the vagaries of weather and climate, as the Great Plains endured a
horrific seven-year drought the likes of which no one could recall.
California, too, has suffered drought in recent years. No one denies
that. Yet however much the drought gets blamed for so many of the
state's problems, the disaster unfolding in the Central Valley is almost
entirely man-made. Fields lie fallow. Families in some of America's
richest cropland face crushing poverty. Businesses go belly-up. The fact
that this is spurred by government policies designed to protect
endangered species from dying off is an irony tinged with tragedy.
Missing in this sad affair has been any element of common sense. But
that may be changing. In response this summer to an appeal of the last
year's Fish and Wildlife Service ruling, Judge Wanger signaled a change
of course. He hinted that the USFWS's decision supporting the shutting
off of pumps to Central Valley farmers (not to mention his initial order
to do so) may have erred by not taking into account the impact on the
human populations. As the issue winds its way through the courts, it
remains to be seen whether Judge Wanger's newfound logic holds up. If
so, there may be protection for the endangered farmer after all.
Max Schulz is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
This month, the American Spectator published an excellent article by Max Schulz of the Manhattan Institute.
In it he explains the unbalanced environmental policies of our government and highlights the man-made
drought facing our state.
I hope you have a chance to read the Schulz article (see below) and encourage you to pass it along to your
friends and family.
In addition, don’t forget that Sean Hannity will be in our area tomorrow. He will be broadcasting FOX
NEWS CHANNEL’S HANNITY from the Westside. This LIVE event will include Comedian/Activist Paul
Rodriguez and others (including myself).
awareness of the man-made drought. I hope you can make it!

Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
By Max Schulz from the September 2009 issue
ANYONE DOUBTING THAT OUR nation's environmental and economic policies can get seriously out of
whack from time to time need only look to the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. Located in California's
Central Valley, between the state's capital city and Stockton, it is where the American, Mokelumne,
Cosumnes, and Calaveras Rivers flow into the larger Sacramento and San Joaquin. It is also where the
saddest agricultural saga since the Depression-era Dust Bowl is now playing, as the waters from those rivers
flow beneath San Francisco's Golden Gate Bridge and out to sea. As they flow unimpeded to the Pacific,
those waters are also washing out to sea the livelihoods of tens of thousands of farm workers and agricultural
business owners. It is an economic as well as human tragedy.
This is a story about water, about its lack as well as its abundance. But it is also a story about the price we
pay to protect the environment, and whether we are striking the right balance between nature and mankind.
In the end, the question is whether people should exercise dominion over nature, or whether nature should
lord over man. To most Americans, the answer is obvious: our capacity to make nature subservient to our
needs justifies doing so, insomuch as we act as responsible stewards of the environment. But however
obvious that might be to most people, the countervailing idea—that nature should take precedence over
mankind—is being sown into a series of laws and regulations that are causing undue torment and distress.
The American West was created, it is fair to say, by mankind taming nature and using it for his own purpose.
That is how the San Joaquin Valley over time became the most productive agricultural region in the world.
Massive and expensive irrigation and public works projects captured the waters in the San Joaquin River
Delta to transform a desert into a paradise, providing much of the fruits and vegetables and dairy products
Americans consume. Millions more acre-feet of water are diverted each year to the state's coastal population
centers from these and other rivers, like the Colorado. By damming and diverting mighty rivers, and
reshaping the landscape all throughout the American West, the federal government allowed Los Angeles,
San Diego, and San Francisco to bloom into the cities we know today.
That is the irony of California: a state that is Valhalla for environmentalists and the home base for the green
movement is an affront to—and perversion of—nature. California is an artificially constructed paradise. The
Golden State owes its golden existence largely to mammoth engineering feats representing mankind's
ingenuity and triumph over the natural realm. It's not just Hoover Dam, that wonder of the modern world,
but dozens of less famous man-made dams and lakes and reservoirs, with names like Glen Canyon and
Parker and Havasu and Link River, that help reshape the landscape to provide water and power to
California's faraway population centers. The state could not sustain its giant cities or its astoundingly fertile
agricultural sector without them. Today's California, that greenest of American states, is itself testimony to
man bending nature to his purpose.
NATURE, OR AT LEAST ITS SELF-STYLED advocates, is striking back. Its cudgel is the federal
Endangered Species Act and supporting California statutes wielded on behalf of fish such as the tiny delta
smelt. In 1993, the delta smelt was listed as threatened under the ESA. And with that designation, litigious
environmental groups went to court. Filing lawsuit after lawsuit on behalf of this or that supposedly
endangered quarry, they aim to dismantle the infrastructure of California's State Water Project (SWP) and
the federal Central Valley Project (CVP). Those two projects' dams, reservoirs, canals, waterways,
aqueducts, and pumps deliver the life-giving water supporting the state's agriculture and supplying its major
cities.
The greens have had some success. In 2007, U.S. district judge Oliver Wanger ruled that the pumping that
annually sent about 6 million acre-feet of water to Kern County and beyond was threatening the delta smelt's
existence by disrupting water flows for the fall spawning season. Citing the protections accorded by the
Endangered Species Act, he ordered pumping for agricultural uses curtailed by one-third until the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service could evaluate the situation. After studying the issue for more than a year, the USFWS
determined last December that pumping by the SWP and CVP "was likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of the delta smelt and adversely modify its critical habitat." The agency issued plans to keep Judge
Wanger's restrictions in place. According to Tulare County supervisor Allen Ishida, "California was forced
to let 660,000 acrefeet of its freshwater supplies run out to the ocean. That was enough water to supply the
entire Silicon Valley for two years."
Further curbs may come, on behalf of the delta smelt as well as other species. The USFWS and the
California Fish and Game Commission are moving forward with threatened and endangered designations for
Chinook salmon, steelhead, and the longfin smelt, presaging further water reductions for agriculture.
The result of these irrigation pump shutdowns is that hundreds of thousands of acres of farmland are being
forced out of production. Kern County authorities estimated that 145,000 of the 850,000 acres that are
typically irrigated were idled or under-irrigated last year. The loss was pegged at $100 million in the county
alone. A study by UC-Davis estimated San Joaquin Valley farm revenue losses to range from $482 million
to $647 million. Total California agricultural economic losses could hit $3 billion this year.
But those are just abstract financial numbers. Behind those figures are real people, farmers and business
owners and families who are losing livelihoods and are being forced to uproot and flee. The UC-Davis study
conservatively suggested 24,000 to 32,000 Central Valley jobs were destroyed by environmental rulings
designed to protect endangered wildlife. It further estimated job losses could approach 80,000 or more if
restrictions intensified. Communities are withering for a government-imposed lack of water. It is little
exaggeration to say that the farmers of the most valuable farming region in the nation are facing extinction.
IS THAT WHAT THE Endangered Species Act was designed to accomplish? In the 36 years since President
Nixon signed the ESA into law (its chief congressional sponsors were Rep. John Dingell, D-MI, and the
future Abscam crook, Sen. Harrison Williams, D-NJ), an entire federal and state government apparatus has
sprung forth to provide protections to creatures like the bald eagle and the grizzly bear. More than 1,300
species of animals, fish, and plants have been designated either "endangered" or "threatened." Certainly,
there have been some preservation successes, notably with iconic animals like our national bird or Smoky
the Bear's cousins.
But while the bald eagle and the grizzly are the poster children of ESA protection, they are the exception and
not the rule. Most species for whose preservation the power of government has been harnessed are ones
whose loss few would mourn, or even notice. How many tears, for instance, would be shed if the rock gnome
lichen disappeared, not to mention the dwarf wedgemussel or the Comal Springs dryopid beetle? Or the delta
smelt? And yet court decisions and other regulatory moves are being made on behalf of these and other
creatures in ways that present significant hardship for landowners. Whether depriving Central Valley farmers
of contractually entitled water or placing restrictions on landowners' use of their own properties, endangered
species regulations end up hamstringing humans for the benefit of certain plants, fish, and animals that few
have heard of and even fewer care about.
Sometimes such hamstringing is merely a costly irritant. Case Western Reserve University law professor
Jonathan Adler has noted, "Under the ESA, individual Americans have been prevented from building homes,
plowing fields, cutting trees, clearing brush, and repairing fences—all on private land."
In other instances, it can be tragic. According to Adler, "The federal government has even barred private
landowners from clearing firebreaks to protect their homes from fire hazards." In 1993, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service forbade residents of California's Riverside County from clearing firebreaks around their
homes for fear of disturbing the endangered Stephens' kangaroo rat (despite the fact state authorities required
them to do so as a fire protection measure). When wildfires whipped through the Southern California
community, nearly two dozen homes were destroyed. The case of the Central Valley farmers is a similar—
and needless—calamity.
The problem, says Tulare County's Ishida, is not the courts or even activist judges. "The problem is the
courts are being forced to base their decisions on laws that have not been amended or changed in decades.
The environmentalists have skillfully used such laws as the Central Valley Project Improvement Act and the
Endangered Species Act so that judges have no alternative but to order massive releases of water."
Ishida recently told a congressional panel that since the passage of the Central Valley Project Improvement
Act in 1992 (roughly the same time that the delta smelt was listed as threatened), the state of California has
redirected more than 3 million acre-feet of water that used to serve cities and farms. Now that water supports
fisheries and habitats. Often it just goes out to sea, completely unused for any of the many purposes for
which a thirsty state is desperate to use it.
As California farmers lose their jobs by the tens of thousands to protect a tiny fish, the sad irony is that the
delta smelt may not be faring much better. That's not because of inadequate protections against humans
offered by state and federal officials, but rather because those officials seem incapable of saving the delta
smelt from nature's predators. The smelt rarely grows much longer than three inches, and it is prey for any
number of other creatures that inhabit the rivers of the San Joaquin Valley. As Rep. Tom McClintock (R-
CA), noted at a recent congressional hearing, the water diversions have not helped the delta smelt
populations. There are quite a few officials who believe that the delta smelt is on Darwin's fast track to
extinction, despite the feel-good efforts of human environmentalists. McClintock's congressional colleague,
George Radanovich, is even rooting it on, calling the smelt "a worthless little worm that needs to go the way
of the dinosaur."
For their part, environmentalists who sue on behalf of the delta smelt consider the tiny fish to be an
absolutely critical part of the food chain, feeding on plankton and in turn serving as food for larger fish and
birds. If the delta smelt disappears, they warn ominously, the local food chain collapses. Whether that's true
or not, what the policies boil down to should be a matter of picking your calamity: should the fish (and
others in the food chain) suffer, or should humans?
PERHAPS THE MOST MYSTIFYING ELEMENT of California's farms-versus-fish imbroglio is the

unwillingness of the media and the state's political establishment (other than the elected representatives of
the region) to confront the issue head-on. Sidestepping the tough questions involved, they refer instead to
California's lengthy drought as the cause of much of the state's misfortune.
"California is in its third year of drought, and many farmers in the state's crop-rich Central Valley are
looking at dusty fields, or worse, are cutting down their orchards before the trees die," according to National
Public Radio in a report typical of the media coverage. "This year, farmers have been told they are getting
only a small fraction of the water they need." The alarm over California's drought spread on both coasts. In
Sacramento, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger declared a state of emergency, while in Washington Congress
held hearings at which Democrats decried "California's Katrina."
Not surprisingly, global warming is being blamed for California's drought. California's drought was regularly
invoked on Capitol Hill as Congress debated cap and trade legislation this summer. Energy Secretary Steven
Chu gave this storyline a boost in February when he warned that drought will cause California's vineyards
and farms to vanish by the end of the 21st century if we fail to combat warming. "We're looking at a scenario
where there's no more agriculture in California," he told the Los Angeles Times.
The only problem with the idea of drought driving California's misery is that it is largely a fiction. There has
been very mild drought in recent years, but not enough to account for the current massive cuts in water to
Central Valley farmers. This spring, the state's Department of Water Resources revealed that the mountain
snowpack feeding California reservoirs was at 80 percent of normal levels, while precipitation in the
northern and southern Sierra was 90 percent of average. This prompted California's chief hydrologist to tell
reporters writing about the supposedly epic conditions that while, sure, there had been some drought, it was
"not the worst we ever had." By the conventional definitions his office employs, he said, 2007 and 2008
barely qualified as drought years at all.
Drought isn't the reason the Central Valley's farmers aren't getting water. "There's plenty of water," says
congressman Devin Nunes, a Republican who represents part of the Central Valley. "But the courts say it
can't be touched, so it's flowing out to sea under the Golden Gate Bridge."
The false drought meme has conveniently allowed policy makers as well as the media to sidestep the
uncomfortable issues surrounding Endangered Species Act regulation. It permits them to avoid confronting
what Nunes refers to as "the fundamental wrongness of choosing fish over people." And it permits them to
avoid taking responsibility for the consequences of government policies and regulations that have
tremendously adverse impacts on ordinary people's lives. When cornered, blame the weather.
DURING THE 1930s, the Dust Bowl tragedy pitted hapless farmers against the vagaries of weather and
climate, as the Great Plains endured a horrific seven-year drought the likes of which no one could recall.
California, too, has suffered drought in recent years. No one denies that. Yet however much the drought gets
blamed for so many of the state's problems, the disaster unfolding in the Central Valley is almost entirely
man-made. Fields lie fallow. Families in some of America's richest cropland face crushing poverty.
Businesses go belly-up. The fact that this is spurred by government policies designed to protect endangered
species from dying off is an irony tinged with tragedy.
Missing in this sad affair has been any element of common sense. But that may be changing. In response this
summer to an appeal of the last year's Fish and Wildlife Service ruling, Judge Wanger signaled a change of
course. He hinted that the USFWS's decision supporting the shutting off of pumps to Central Valley farmers
(not to mention his initial order to do so) may have erred by not taking into account the impact on the human
populations. As the issue winds its way through the courts, it remains to be seen whether Judge Wanger's
newfound logic holds up. If so, there may be protection for the endangered farmer after all.
Max Schulzis a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.

MAIL
Subject: Senate Republicans Seek to End Man-Made Drought
Date: 22-Sep-2009 14:04
Message Id: 4AB8D976.VIS.PO4.200.200008A.1.3A000.1
Dear Friends,
Today, Senator Jim DeMint (South Carolina)

<http://demint.senate.gov/public/> and his Republican colleagues took
action to restore the flow of water to dry California communities.
They offered an amendment to a bill moving through Congress that is

similar to my legislation which House Democratic leaders have
successfully blocked on multiple occasions
<http://nunes.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Issues.View&Issue_id=350eb4
9e-b0d0-fc95-f8bb-37ee86400e38> (see video here)
<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes#play/uploads/18/75jk5ZSqmAg>
.
This new development is thanks to the increasing national awareness of

our suffering and is the direct result of the tireless work of people
like Paul Rodriquez <http://www.gotwater.org/> , Ray Appleton
<http://www.kmj580.com/pages/rayappleton> and Sean Hannity
<http://www.foxnews.com/hannity/index.html> .
Senate Republicans took on our cause with the understanding that while
many efforts are underway to resolve California's long-term water
challenges, relief is needed now.
We cannot undergo another year where water deliveries are shut down,
only to be temporarily restored after farmland is transformed into
desert. This unjust water policy prioritizes fish over families, has
devastated San Joaquin Valley communities, and is threatening the water
supply of large population centers- including those in Southern
California.
Despite the nature of the suffering in our region, Senator Dianne

Feinstein objected to the amendment, comparing the effort to gain
passage of a one year Endangered Species Act waiver to Pearl Harbor.
The filibustering of the DeMint amendment today is shameful. The fact
that our own senior Senator is responsible adds insult to injury. A
vote will occur later today.
See my YouTube Channel for video of the debate.

<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes> Note: the video is in two
parts
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

The following organizations supported the DeMint amendment today:
Tulare County Farm Bureau
Fresno County Farm Bureau
Kings County Farm Bureau
Families Protecting the Valley
Westlands Water District
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority
San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors Water Authority
Chowchilla Water District
California Grape and Tree Fruit League
Fresno County Board of Supervisors
Western Growers Association
California Poultry Federation
California Citrus Mutual
California Cotton Ginners Association
California Cotton Growers Association
Nisei Farmers League

California Tomato Growers Association
National Cotton Council of America
California Farm Bureau Federation
Campos Brothers Farms

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Today, Senator Jim DeMint (South Carolina) and his Republican colleagues took action to restore the flow
of water to dry California communities.
They offered an amendment to a bill moving through Congress that is similar to my legislation which House
Democratic leaders have successfully blocked on multiple occasions (see video here).
This new development is thanks to the increasing national awareness of our suffering and is the direct result
of the tireless work of people like Paul Rodriquez, Ray Appleton and Sean Hannity.
Senate Republicans took on our cause with the understanding that while many efforts are underway to
resolve California’s long-term water challenges, relief is needed now.
We cannot undergo another year where water deliveries are shut down, only to be temporarily restored after
farmland is transformed into desert. This unjust water policy prioritizes fish over families, has devastated
San Joaquin Valley communities, and is threatening the water supply of large population centers- including
those in Southern California.
Despite the nature of the suffering in our region, Senator Dianne Feinstein objected to the amendment,
comparing the effort to gain passage of a one year Endangered Species Act waiver to Pearl Harbor. The
filibustering of the DeMint amendment today is shameful. The fact that our own senior Senator is
responsible adds insult to injury. A vote will occur later today.
See my YouTube Channel for video of the debate. Note: the video is in two parts
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
The following organizations supported the DeMint amendment today:
Tulare County Farm Bureau
Fresno County Farm Bureau
Kings County Farm Bureau
Families Protecting the Valley
Westlands Water District
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority
San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors Water Authority
Chowchilla Water District
California Grape and Tree Fruit League
Fresno County Board of Supervisors
Western Growers Association
California Poultry Federation
California Citrus Mutual
California Cotton Ginners Association
California Cotton Growers Association

Nisei Farmers League
California Tomato Growers Association
National Cotton Council of America
California Farm Bureau Federation
Campos Brothers Farms

MAIL
Subject: Nunes confronts Secretary Salazar, Senator Feinstein and Rep. George Miller - demands action
Date: 30-Sep-2009 14:01
Message Id: 4AC364BA.VIS.PO4.200.20000C3.1.26391.1
Dear Friends,
Earlier today, Secretary Ken Salazar held a public meeting in Washington

DC to discuss California's water crisis.
During the meeting, I was surprised to once again here Secretary Salazar
reject the notion that we are experiencing a government-imposed drought
(listen
<http://nunes.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=571
078a7-477e-4a9f-80c5-f1b8e9857a45> here). In my view, and in the
considered opinion of those who are directly impacted by water shortages
today, there is no question as to why San Joaquin Valley communities are
suffering. That reason is a flawed system of regulation related to the
Endangered Species Act and, more specifically, unjust priorities that
have made a three inch minnow more important than human beings.
While long-term solutions are needed and I am not opposed to studies

that would help achieve them, the people of the San Joaquin Valley are
suffering and they need help now. For this reason, I have fought to
gain support for Congress to temporarily grant California the same
legislative relief New Mexico received in 2003 - namely, the short-term
restoration of normal pumping operations from the Delta.
You
<http://nunes.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=cca
2ea88-7349-4ba0-8fdb-32f712593205> can hear my complete remarks by
clicking here.
Sincerely,
image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

cid:image002.jpg@01CA0C65.39471370
cid:image003.jpg@01CA0C65.39471370 <http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Earlier today, Secretary Ken Salazar held a public meeting in Washington DC to discuss California’s water
crisis.
During the meeting, I was surprised to once again here Secretary Salazar reject the notion that we are
experiencing a government-imposed drought (listen here). In my view, and in the considered opinion of
those who are directly impacted by water shortages today, there is no question as to why San Joaquin Valley
communities are suffering. That reason is a flawed system of regulation related to the Endangered Species
Act and, more specifically, unjust priorities that have made a three inch minnow more important than human
beings.
While long-term solutions are needed and I am not opposed to studies that would help achieve them, the
people of the San Joaquin Valley are suffering and they need help now. For this reason, I have fought to
gain support for Congress to temporarily grant California the same legislative relief New Mexico received in
2003 – namely, the short-term restoration of normal pumping operations from the Delta.
You can hear my complete remarks by clicking here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
MAIL
Subject: what is wrong with this government?
Date: 08-Oct-2009 15:26
Message Id: 4ACE0499.VIS.PO4.200.20000F2.1.51263.1
Dear Friends,
I <http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes> recently posted video of

my remarks at the Department of Interior's California water forum. The
statements of Senator Dianne Feinstein and George Miller are also
posted.
These videos further highlight the extent of the challenge we face in

finding a solution to the government-imposed drought.
Sincerely,
image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I recently posted video of my remarks at the Department of Interior’s California water forum. The
statements of Senator Dianne Feinstein and George Miller are also posted.
These videos further highlight the extent of the challenge we face in finding a solution to the government-
imposed drought.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
MAIL
Subject: George Miller's Valley of Revenge
Date: 09-Oct-2009 10:32
Message Id: 4ACF1151.VIS.PO4.200.20000C5.1.28960.1
Dear Friends,
Last week, Congressman <http://georgemiller.house.gov/> George Miller

(D-CA) attempted to gain passage of a water recycling bill for the
greater San Francisco Bay Area. Congressional leaders pursued passage
of this bill on the House schedule reserved for non-controversial
measures, meaning it required a 2/3 vote to pass.
As you know, the Speaker and Mr. Miller have refused to allow San
Joaquin Valley water legislation to be debated. For this reason, I
asked my Republican colleagues to help defeat the Bay Area water bill.
In doing so, we insisted that valley water problems be debated
along-side legislation related to Bay Area water.
In my view, it is irresponsible for Congress to consider spending tens

of millions of dollars on Bay Area water recycling programs while
communities in the San Joaquin Valley are being deprived access to water
and ignored by Congress. No one in the Bay Area has had their water
taken from them and Congressional attention should be focused on helping
those suffering from the government-imposed drought.
Instead of recognizing that he needs to allow a debate on the valley

water crisis, Congressman Miller responded by seeking revenge against
Republicans who fought for our voices to be heard.
Fox <http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes> News reported the
shocking actions of Mr. Miller last night (click here for video of the
broadcast).
Sincerely,
image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Last week, Congressman George Miller (D-CA) attempted to gain passage of a water recycling bill for the
greater San Francisco Bay Area. Congressional leaders pursued passage of this bill on the House schedule
reserved for non-controversial measures, meaning it required a 2/3 vote to pass.
As you know, the Speaker and Mr. Miller have refused to allow San Joaquin Valley water legislation to be
debated. For this reason, I asked my Republican colleagues to help defeat the Bay Area water bill. In doing
so, we insisted that valley water problems be debated along-side legislation related to Bay Area water.
In my view, it is irresponsible for Congress to consider spending tens of millions of dollars on Bay Area
water recycling programs while communities in the San Joaquin Valley are being deprived access to water
and ignored by Congress. No one in the Bay Area has had their water taken from them and Congressional
attention should be focused on helping those suffering from the government-imposed drought.
Instead of recognizing that he needs to allow a debate on the valley water crisis, Congressman Miller
responded by seeking revenge against Republicans who fought for our voices to be heard.
Fox News reported the shocking actions of Mr. Miller last night (click here for video of the broadcast).
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
MAIL
Subject: House of Hypocrisy
Date: 15-Oct-2009 18:21
Message Id: 4AD76818.VIS.PO4.200.2000091.1.3B8A4.1
Dear Friends,
Today, the House of Representatives passed Congressman George Miller's

(D-Martinez) legislation to fund water recycling in the Bay Area.
However, Democratic leaders refused to address the water needs of the
San Joaquin Valley, which is suffering the worst government-imposed
water crisis in American history.
Last night and again today I tried to add language to the Bay Area water
bill that would give our region temporary relief from pumping
restrictions (restrictions that take place between November and July).
We need this relief to keep our region alive while state and federal
leaders examine long-term solutions - including more storage and new
canals.
My proposal was identical to one that passed the House and Senate in
2003 - with an overwhelming bipartisan vote. In that previous case, the
people of Albuquerque were losing water because of the endangered
silvery minnow. Congress acted swiftly and the people were spared water
shortages.
Despite this fact, one Democrat, Nick Rahall, suggested my efforts were
nothing but a partisan distraction and that I might as well be proposing
a rain dance! This is the man who serves as Chairman of the Natural
Resources Committee.
While disappointing, today's outcome showed us that we are making a

difference. We forced the House to debate the man-made drought for
several hours - giving the concerns of San Joaquin Valley residents more
attention than ever before. We have also exposed the motives of George
Miller who admitted to being the mastermind of legislation that has
deprived our region of water. He even took credit for environmental
lawsuits that have devastated our region.
Most importantly, we have shown through debate and votes on the House
floor that some Democrats are willing to join us. I have always said
that actions are more important than words. Votes are the only way for
us to know who represents the American public and who represents three
inch bait fish. You can view how each Congressman voted by clicking
here <http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2009/roll789.xml> .
For your information, I have posted several segments of the debate on my

YouTube channel (click here <http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>
). I also blogged on the events of the day (click here).
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Today, the House of Representatives passed Congressman George Miller’s (D-Martinez) legislation to fund
water recycling in the Bay Area. However, Democratic leaders refused to address the water needs of the San
Joaquin Valley, which is suffering the worst government-imposed water crisis in American history.
Last night and again today I tried to add language to the Bay Area water bill that would give our region
temporary relief from pumping restrictions (restrictions that take place between November and July). We
need this relief to keep our region alive while state and federal leaders examine long-term solutions –
including more storage and new canals.
My proposal was identical to one that passed the House and Senate in 2003 – with an overwhelming
bipartisan vote. In that previous case, the people of Albuquerque were losing water because of the
endangered silvery minnow. Congress acted swiftly and the people were spared water shortages.
Despite this fact, one Democrat, Nick Rahall, suggested my efforts were nothing but a partisan distraction
and that I might as well be proposing a rain dance! This is the man who serves as Chairman of the Natural
Resources Committee.
While disappointing, today’s outcome showed us that we are making a difference. We forced the House to
debate the man-made drought for several hours – giving the concerns of San Joaquin Valley residents more
attention than ever before. We have also exposed the motives of George Miller who admitted to being the
mastermind of legislation that has deprived our region of water. He even took credit for environmental
lawsuits that have devastated our region.
Most importantly, we have shown through debate and votes on the House floor that some Democrats are
willing to join us. I have always said that actions are more important than words. Votes are the only way for
us to know who represents the American public and who represents three inch bait fish. You can view how
each Congressman voted by clicking here.
For your information, I have posted several segments of the debate on my YouTube channel (click here). I
also blogged on the events of the day (click here).
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
MAIL
Subject: Liberal Politicians And Ag Organizations Team Up To Keep Water Shut Off
Date: 19-Oct-2009 14:39
Message Id: 4ADC7A04.VIS.PO4.200.2000051.1.1F7CE.1
Dear Friends,
Please read my latest blog entry which explains some of the serious
challenges we face related to the water crisis, as well as a call to
action.
Sincerely,
Monday, October 19, 2009
Liberal Politicians And Ag Organizations Team Up To Keep Water Shut Off

<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/2009/10/liberal-politicians-and-ag.html>
What's good enough for New Mexico isn't good enough for California
I have fought aggressively to bring our water crisis to the attention of

Congress and the American people. In the past year, we have achieved an
important milestone - we are part of the national debate.
There should be no confusion as to what the goal is. The legislation I
have been offering to my colleagues is virtually identical to
legislation passed in 2003 for the people of New Mexico. That bill
passed the Senate unanimously and passed the House with an overwhelming
bipartisan vote.
Recently, Senator Dianne Feinstein said of my efforts, "I've been very

disappointed in his approach, to hit and hit." And that, "We have a
problem and it won't be solved by saying, turn the pumps on, turn the
pumps off." (see the article here
<http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j1R-3lwenTkejYRqFIdrt
T_DsVOgD9B1QCVO2> )
My response is two-fold. First, Senator if you don't turn on the pumps

in the short-term, you will preside over the mass conversion of our
nation's most fertile and valuable farmland into desert. Second, since
the Senator and her allies in the House were willing to vote for an ESA
waiver for New Mexico in 2003, I would like to know what exactly has
changed. Why was an Endangered Species Act (ESA) waiver good enough for
the citizens of New Mexico but not California?
In the meantime, I will continue to force Feinstein and others to vote

with or against the people of California. To date, every time we've
brought the issue up the vast majority of Democrats chose fish. That's
not partisan. That's the way it is (see my remarks at Interior
<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes> ).
If Senator Feinstein wants to know how many times I am going to keep

hitting, she should know that I will keep doing it - finding every
creative way to make use of the House and Senate Rules - until Democrats
do what's right. That means passage of the same type of relief they
unanimously accepted in 2003 for New Mexico. In that instance, the three
inch bait fish causing all the trouble was called the silvery minnow.
Why are Democrats blocking any effort to bring swift relief to our
region? Just listen to their statements on the House Floor and it
becomes clear that they are proxies for the radical environmental
movement:
Congressmen Sam Farr (see here)

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOFqz5e6VnU> , Earl Blumenauer (see
here) <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVwMJXor1Ck> , and Mike Thompson
(see here) <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUijBPegbk0> have all
decried the San Joaquin Valley's illegal use of water. The very water
that keeps our communities alive and transformed the San Joaquin Valley
into the most productive farmland in the nation has been taken because
we have benefited from "illegal water deliveries."
Congressman Farr believes we live in a desert (see here)

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOFqz5e6VnU> . He blames the massive
public projects, built by Democrats like President Franklin D. Roosevelt
and John F. Kennedy, for the destruction of fisheries throughout the
West. Keep in mind that these are the same fisherman that the government
paid more than $100 million not to fish.
During his diatribe against my efforts to gain support for common sense
water policy, Natural Resources Chairman Nick Rahall suggested we all do
a rain dance (see here). <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oXqBHd3Ebc>
These statements, as well as others made during the water debate,

represent damning evidence of a lack of compassion for the people of the
San Joaquin Valley. Worse, they have proven that Democrats are held
hostage by radical interests in the environmental movement - people who
believe balanced environmental policy means returning our region to a
desert.
Not only have House Democrats blocked progress, but so too have
California's U.S. Senators. Senator Jim DeMint, representing the
interests of the people in our state, tried to gain approval of a
watered down New Mexico amendment - a one year ESA waiver. Our Senators
led the charge against it. Feinstein cried ambush, likening the move to
Pearl Harbor (see here) <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLxMaHNnUqo> ,
and claimed not to understand the goal. In truth, she understood it. She
was given nearly six hours to read the one page amendment and was
approached prior to the debate with both a copy of the amendment and the
rational (see here)
<http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/ID/212713&start=8333&end=8604> .
The contrast in leadership could not be more striking. Jeff Bingaman, a

liberal U.S. Senator from New Mexico, worked with Republicans in 2003 to
get an ESA waiver to restore the flow of water to his constituents.
Senator Feinstein supported Bingaman's effort, acknowledging the urgency
of the situation. However, when it comes to her own state, she claims
not to understand the provision and opposes it.
Let me be clear for those who continue to plead ignorance - both in
Congress and in various agricultural organizations in our state. My
goal, the only goal, is for the water supply to be restored to our
region - water that has been flowing to San Joaquin Valley communities
for 50 years. My temporary measure, the New Mexico language, is the only
way to grant the San Joaquin Valley relief while larger and more
ambitious plans are debated.
As a side effect of my work, I have exposed the relationship between

Democrat politicians and the radical environmental movement. During a
public forum, Congressman George Miller went so far as to take credit
for lawsuits that have devastated our region (see his admission during a
speech at Interior here <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZyi4BA0lVU> ).
In addition, I have exposed a weakness in our own community - rural

California. I have discovered a prevailing mentality among some
agriculture industry leaders that favor appeasement in all matters. In
defense of inaction, these political appeasers and defenders of the
status quo have signaled their true loyalties. They would rather farming
communities be transformed into desert than any of their friends in
government be held accountable. They are providing permanent political
cover to Democrats whose loyalty has long since left rural California.
Some of our state's agriculture community 'leaders' have even become an

extension of Senator's Feinstein's public relations staff. Apparently
concerned about the Senator's reputation, one career ag leader responded
to my efforts with Senator DeMint by saying "it was wrong on his part."
(read the story <http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/77317.html> )
<http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/77317.html> Several others
have issued press releases praising the Senator for her work on behalf
of farmers.
These organizations, through their actions, have undermined my work to

restore the flow of water in our state. At the same time they have clung
to a host of symbolic acts and misled their members. For example, some
agriculture groups have decided studies are an adequate response to the
man-made drought. Meanwhile, little or no leadership is being shown when
it comes to delivering real relief to the people.
Californians know the status quo isn't working. What they want to know
is how many times their representatives will compromise in order to gain
political favor? Is being part of the discussion worth selling out rural
communities?
Aggressive representation is how the radical environmental movement has
been able to take control of California's water supply. At the same
time, pacifists and apologists in our own community have hastened our
losses. Every time we turn around, courts, legislators and radical
environmentalists are demanding more water from increasingly dry
California communities. Yet they give us nothing in return. No
additional water sources; No way to transfer water around the Delta; No
plan to deal with shrinking ground water aquifers.
Worse than nothing, they give us failed policies. More fish species are
endangered today than in 1992, when Congressman George Miller and his
allies diverted more than a million acre feet of our water to protect
the Delta ecosystem. That water giveaway, known as CVPIA, was the first
major blow to our way of life in the San Joaquin. Since then, we have
endured more water give-aways - including the San Joaquin River
Settlement Act.
Dry farmland and high unemployment is where "compromises" have gotten

us. We can thank passivism for CVPIA, the San Joaquin River Settlement,
various biological decisions and lawsuits. Further compromise is certain
death - something Senator Feinstein understood in 1994 when she said, "I
oppose any efforts to take water from Friant Dam for the purpose of
restoring a long gone fishery on the San Joaquin River (click here)
<http://nunes.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=9b3
a91ae-8bf7-4883-9985-0426ddea1e4a> ." Unfortunately, representatives of
rural communities weren't done compromising and thanks to Senator
Feinstein's legislation earlier this year, the San Joaquin River
Settlement Act is law and the Eastside of the valley is poised to suffer
the same fate as the Westside.
Now is the time for strong representation, not political expediency. We

have clear legislative language that passed Congress in 2003 that is
capable of delivering us the short-term relief we need to survive.
Now is not the time for agriculture industry representatives to make

excuses for politicians. You should insist that the people who represent
you are more concerned about our region's future than their continued
access to choice political discussions. You must insist that your
association unequivocally endorses the New Mexico amendment and a
temporary waiver to the ESA for California.
Finally, we should thank the Fresno Bee and Mike Doyle for helping to
uncover some of the serious issues we face. The paper helped expose
leaders in our own community who are obstructing a resolution to the
water crisis, while claiming to represent rural communities and farmers.
Now it is time for the Bee to tackle another tough question. Why did
Senators Feinstein and Boxer support the New Mexico language in 2003 but
continue to block similar language for their own constituents in 2009?
Posted by Congressman Devin Nunes

<http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=5957826886195818825&postID=28
73925820098028652>

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Please read my latest blog entry which explains some of the serious challenges we face related to the water
crisis, as well as a call to action.
Sincerely,
Monday, October 19, 2009

Liberal Politicians And Ag Organizations Team Up To Keep Water Shut Off
WHAT’S GOOD ENOUGH FOR NEW MEXICO ISN’T GOOD ENOUGH FOR CALIFORNIA
I have fought aggressively to bring our water crisis to the attention of Congress and the American people. In the past year, we have
achieved an important milestone – we are part of the national debate.
There should be no confusion as to what the goal is. The legislation I have been offering to my colleagues is virtually
identical to legislation passed in 2003 for the people of New Mexico. That bill passed the Senate unanimously and passed
the House with an overwhelming bipartisan vote.
Recently, Senator Dianne Feinstein said of my efforts, "I've been very disappointed in his approach, to hit and hit." And that, "We
have a problem and it won't be solved by saying, turn the pumps on, turn the pumps off." (see the article here)
My response is two-fold. First, Senator if you don't turn on the pumps in the short-term, you will preside over the mass conversion
of our nation's most fertile and valuable farmland into desert. Second, since the Senator and her allies in the House were willing to
vote for an ESA waiver for New Mexico in 2003, I would like to know what exactly has changed. Why was an Endangered
Species Act (ESA) waiver good enough for the citizens of New Mexico but not California?
In the meantime, I will continue to force Feinstein and others to vote with or against the people of California. To date, every time
we've brought the issue up the vast majority of Democrats chose fish. That's not partisan. That's the way it is (see my remarks at
Interior).
If Senator Feinstein wants to know how many times I am going to keep hitting, she should know that I will keep doing it – finding
every creative way to make use of the House and Senate Rules - until Democrats do what's right. That means passage of the same
type of relief they unanimously accepted in 2003 for New Mexico. In that instance, the three inch bait fish causing all the trouble
was called the silvery minnow.
Why are Democrats blocking any effort to bring swift relief to our region? Just listen to their statements on the House Floor and it
becomes clear that they are proxies for the radical environmental movement:
Congressmen Sam Farr (see here), Earl Blumenauer (see here), and Mike Thompson (see here) have all decried the San Joaquin
Valley’s illegal use of water. The very water that keeps our communities alive and transformed the San Joaquin Valley into the
most productive farmland in the nation has been taken because we have benefited from “illegal water deliveries.”
Congressman Farr believes we live in a desert (see here). He blames the massive public projects, built by Democrats like President
Franklin D. Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy, for the destruction of fisheries throughout the West. Keep in mind that these are the
same fisherman that the government paid more than $100 million not to fish.
During his diatribe against my efforts to gain support for common sense water policy, Natural Resources Chairman Nick Rahall
suggested we all do a rain dance (see here).
These statements, as well as others made during the water debate, represent damning evidence of a lack of compassion for the
people of the San Joaquin Valley. Worse, they have proven that Democrats are held hostage by radical interests in the
environmental movement - people who believe balanced environmental policy means returning our region to a desert.
Not only have House Democrats blocked progress, but so too have California's U.S. Senators. Senator Jim DeMint, representing
the interests of the people in our state, tried to gain approval of a watered down New Mexico amendment – a one year ESA
waiver. Our Senators led the charge against it. Feinstein cried ambush, likening the move to Pearl Harbor (see here), and claimed
not to understand the goal. In truth, she understood it. She was given nearly six hours to read the one page amendment and was
approached prior to the debate with both a copy of the amendment and the rational (see here).
The contrast in leadership could not be more striking. Jeff Bingaman, a liberal U.S. Senator from New Mexico, worked with
Republicans in 2003 to get an ESA waiver to restore the flow of water to his constituents. Senator Feinstein supported Bingaman's
effort, acknowledging the urgency of the situation. However, when it comes to her own state, she claims not to understand the
provision and opposes it.
Let me be clear for those who continue to plead ignorance – both in Congress and in various agricultural organizations in
our state. My goal, the only goal, is for the water supply to be restored to our region – water that has been flowing to San
Joaquin Valley communities for 50 years. My temporary measure, the New Mexico language, is the only way to grant the
San Joaquin Valley relief while larger and more ambitious plans are debated.
As a side effect of my work, I have exposed the relationship between Democrat politicians and the radical environmental
movement. During a public forum, Congressman George Miller went so far as to take credit for lawsuits that have devastated our
region (see his admission during a speech at Interior here).
In addition, I have exposed a weakness in our own community – rural California. I have discovered a prevailing mentality among
some agriculture industry leaders that favor appeasement in all matters. In defense of inaction, these political appeasers and
defenders of the status quo have signaled their true loyalties. They would rather farming communities be transformed into desert
than any of their friends in government be held accountable. They are providing permanent political cover to Democrats whose
loyalty has long since left rural California.
Some of our state's agriculture community 'leaders' have even become an extension of Senator's Feinstein's public relations staff.
Apparently concerned about the Senator's reputation, one career ag leader responded to my efforts with Senator DeMint by saying
"it was wrong on his part." (read the story) Several others have issued press releases praising the Senator for her work on behalf of
farmers.
These organizations, through their actions, have undermined my work to restore the flow of water in our state. At the same time
they have clung to a host of symbolic acts and misled their members. For example, some agriculture groups have decided studies
are an adequate response to the man-made drought. Meanwhile, little or no leadership is being shown when it comes to delivering
real relief to the people.
Californians know the status quo isn't working. What they want to know is how many times their representatives will compromise
in order to gain political favor? Is being part of the discussion worth selling out rural communities?
Aggressive representation is how the radical environmental movement has been able to take control of California's water supply.
At the same time, pacifists and apologists in our own community have hastened our losses. Every time we turn around, courts,
legislators and radical environmentalists are demanding more water from increasingly dry California communities. Yet they give
us nothing in return. No additional water sources; No way to transfer water around the Delta; No plan to deal with shrinking
ground water aquifers.
Worse than nothing, they give us failed policies. More fish species are endangered today than in 1992, when Congressman George
Miller and his allies diverted more than a million acre feet of our water to protect the Delta ecosystem. That water giveaway,
known as CVPIA, was the first major blow to our way of life in the San Joaquin. Since then, we have endured more water give-
aways – including the San Joaquin River Settlement Act.
Dry farmland and high unemployment is where "compromises" have gotten us. We can thank passivism for CVPIA, the San
Joaquin River Settlement, various biological decisions and lawsuits. Further compromise is certain death – something Senator
Feinstein understood in 1994 when she said, "I oppose any efforts to take water from Friant Dam for the purpose of restoring a
long gone fishery on the San Joaquin River (click here)." Unfortunately, representatives of rural communities weren't done
compromising and thanks to Senator Feinstein's legislation earlier this year, the San Joaquin River Settlement Act is law and the
Eastside of the valley is poised to suffer the same fate as the Westside.
Now is the time for strong representation, not political expediency. We have clear legislative language that passed Congress in
2003 that is capable of delivering us the short-term relief we need to survive.
Now is not the time for agriculture industry representatives to make excuses for politicians. You should insist that the people
who represent you are more concerned about our region's future than their continued access to choice political discussions. You
must insist that your association unequivocally endorses the New Mexico amendment and a temporary waiver to the ESA for
California.
Finally, we should thank the Fresno Bee and Mike Doyle for helping to uncover some of the serious issues we face. The paper
helped expose leaders in our own community who are obstructing a resolution to the water crisis, while claiming to represent rural
communities and farmers. Now it is time for the Bee to tackle another tough question. Why did Senators Feinstein and Boxer
support the New Mexico language in 2003 but continue to block similar language for their own constituents in 2009?
POSTED BY CONGRESSMAN DEVIN NUNES
message.
MAIL
From: chuck@rbtincca.com
To: Jack Allwardt, Tom Sparks, vickiew@sjr.com, Mike Ennis, pamkimball@hotmail.com, Allen Ishida, Ben Giuliani, Ted Smalley
Subject: Fw: Letter to Devin Nunes
Date: 13-Nov-2009 14:50
Mime.822 (error accessing attachment)
SJVR 11-12-09.doc [Save] [Open]
Message Id: 4AFD7225.VIS.PO4.200.2000039.1.17E5C.1
Here is a concerned rail shipper and receiver who's business and livelihood is being threatened by the SJVR and their
abandonment plans.
----- Original Message -----
From: Andria Fike
To: chuck@rbtincca.com
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 2:07 PM
Subject: Letter to Devin Nunes
Hi, Chuck,
Thanks for taking time to call me this afternoon. Attached is the letter I sent to Devin Nunes, as well as the members of
the Tulare County Board of Supervisors, Assembly Members Connie Conway, Juan Arambula and Danny Gilmore,
Senator Ray Ashburn and Senator Dave Cogdill.
Should you have any questions, or suggestions as to further action I should take, please call me at either my office (559)
584-7695 or on my cellular (559) 904-3372.
Thank you for all your help!!
Andria Fike
SUPERIOR SOIL SUPPLEMENTS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Here is a concerned rail shipper and receiver who's business and livelihood is being threatened by the SJVR
and their abandonment plans.
From: Andria Fike
Hi, Chuck,
Thanks for taking time to call me this afternoon. Attached is the letter I sent to Devin Nunes, as well as
the members of the Tulare County Board of Supervisors, Assembly Members Connie Conway, Juan
Arambula and Danny Gilmore, Senator Ray Ashburn and Senator Dave Cogdill.
Should you have any questions, or suggestions as to further action I should take, please call me at either my
office (559) 584-7695 or on my cellular (559) 904-3372.
Andria Fike
MAIL
From: RBall@kerncog.org
To: Jack Allwardt, Tom Sparks, pamkimball@hotmail.com, Ted Smalley, vickiew@sjr.com, Mike Ennis, Allen Ishida, Ben Giuliani,
Chuck Littlefield
Subject: Re: Fw: Letter to Devin Nunes - Concerns over Abandoment of Rail Spur Lines
Date: 16-Nov-2009 08:37
SJVR 11-12-09.doc [Save] [Open]
Message Id: 4B010F35.VIS.PO4.200.200000C.1.12BB35.1
Letter like the one attached are extremely effective in mobilizing

Federal, State and Local elected officials to preserve the SJVR rail
spurs from abandonment plans. It would be helpful if other businesses
that had similar concerns, make them known to local electeds, and cc:
your local association or council of governments which are responsible
for regional transportation planning.
Council of Fresno County Governments

2035 Tulare Street, Suite 201
Fresno, CA 93721
Tony Boren, Executive Director
559-233-4148
FAX: 559-233-9645
Web: www.fresnocog.org ( http://www.fresnocog.org/ )
Kern Council of Governments

1401 19th Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Ronald E. Brummett, Executive Director
661-861-2191
FAX: 661-324-8215
Web: www.kerncog.org
Kings County Association of Governments

339 West “D” Street, Suite B
Lemoore, CA 93245
Terri King, Executive Director
559-582-3211 Ext. 2654
FAX: 559-924-5632
Web: www.countyofkings.com/kcag
Tulare County Association of Governments

5961 South Mooney Blvd.
Visalia, CA 93291
Ted Smalley, Executive Director
559-624-7274
FAX: 559-733-6720
Web: www.tularecog.org
>>> "Chuck Littlefield" <chuck@rbtincca.com> 11/13/2009 2:49 PM >>>

Here is a concerned rail shipper and receiver who's business and
livelihood is being threatened by the SJVR and their abandonment plans.
----- Original Message ----- From: Andria Fike (
mailto:sales@superiorsoil.com )
Hi, Chuck,
Thanks for taking time to call me this afternoon. Attached is the

letter I sent to Devin Nunes, as well as the members of the Tulare
County Board of Supervisors, Assembly Members Connie Conway, Juan
Arambula and Danny Gilmore, Senator Ray Ashburn and Senator Dave
Cogdill.
Should you have any questions, or suggestions as to further action I

should take, please call me at either my office (559) 584-7695 or on my
cellular (559) 904-3372.
Andria Fike
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Letter like the one attached are extremely effective in mobilizing Federal, State and Local elected officials to preserve the SJVR rail
spurs from abandonment plans. It would be helpful if other businesses that had similar concerns, make them known to local
electeds, and cc: your local association or council of governments which are responsible for regional transportation planning.
Council of Fresno County Governments

2035 Tulare Street, Suite 201
Fresno, CA 93721
Tony Boren, Executive Director
559-233-4148
FAX: 559-233-9645
Web: www.fresnocog.org
Kern Council of Governments

1401 19th Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Ronald E. Brummett, Executive Director
661-861-2191
FAX: 661-324-8215
Web: www.kerncog.org
Kings County Association of Governments

339 West “D” Street, Suite B
Lemoore, CA 93245
Terri King, Executive Director
559-582-3211 Ext. 2654
FAX: 559-924-5632
Web: www.countyofkings.com/kcag
Tulare County Association of Governments

5961 South Mooney Blvd.
Visalia, CA 93291
Ted Smalley, Executive Director
559-624-7274
FAX: 559-733-6720
Web: www.tularecog.org
>>> "Chuck Littlefield" <chuck@rbtincca.com> 11/13/2009 2:49 PM >>>

Here is a concerned rail shipper and receiver who's business and livelihood is being threatened by the SJVR and their abandonment
plans.
From: Andria Fike
Hi, Chuck,
Thanks for taking time to call me this afternoon. Attached is the letter I sent to Devin Nunes, as well as the members of the Tulare
County Board of Supervisors, Assembly Members Connie Conway, Juan Arambula and Danny Gilmore, Senator Ray Ashburn and
Senator Dave Cogdill.
Should you have any questions, or suggestions as to further action I should take, please call me at either my office (559) 584-7695
or on my cellular (559) 904-3372.
Andria Fike
MAIL
From: totmfarms@yahoo.com
To: Pete Vander Poel
Subject: Fw: USDA Grant Letter of Support for Ron & Evie Locke
Date: 24-Nov-2009 14:21
Letter from Devin Nunes.pdf [Save] [Open]
Message Id: 4B0BEBEA.VIS.PO4.200.2000075.1.2319A.1
Pete, Attached is the letter from Devin Nunes. Thank you so much for your time.
----- Forwarded Message ----

From: Evie Locke <totmfarms@yahoo.com>
To: PVanderpoel@co.tulare.ca.us
Sent: Thu, November 19, 2009 11:53:52 AM
Subject: USDA Grant Letter of Support for Ron & Evie Locke
Dear Pete:
We are applying for a Value-Added Grant (Planning

Version) with the USDA. Our project is to build a small processing
plant on our dairy. We plan to process a percentage of our milk and
bottle it. The milk would be bottled in glass and we would feature
home delivery to homes throughout the valley. We would be adding value
to our milk by producing, processing and distributing our milk locally.
We would like to talk to you about our project and see if you would write a letter of support on our behalf. We have
received a letter of recommendation from Devin Nunes and awaiting a letter from Connie Conway.
We appreciate your consideration in this matter. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Ron
at (559) 358-0610. The grant application expires November 30th, 2009 so any assistance you can provide would be
helpful.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Ron and Evie Locke

TOP O' THE MORN FARMS
17324 Road 136
Tulare CA 93274
Office: 559-688-8100
Fax: 559-688-7272
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Pete, Attached is the letter from Devin Nunes. Thank you so much for your time.
----- Forwarded Message ----

From: Evie Locke <totmfarms@yahoo.com>
To: PVanderpoel@co.tulare.ca.us
Sent: Thu, November 19, 2009 11:53:52 AM
Subject: USDA Grant Letter of Support for Ron & Evie Locke
Dear Pete:
We are applying for a Value-Added Grant (Planning Version) with the USDA. Our project is to build a
small processing plant on our dairy. We plan to process a percentage of our milk and bottle it. The milk
would be bottled in glass and we would feature home delivery to homes throughout the valley. We would be
adding value to our milk by producing, processing and distributing our milk locally.
We would like to talk to you about our project and see if you would write a letter of support on our
behalf. We have received a letter of recommendation from Devin Nunes and awaiting a letter from Connie
Conway.
We appreciate your consideration in this matter. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact Ron at (559) 358-0610. The grant application expires November 30th, 2009 so any assistance you
can provide would be helpful.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Ron and Evie Locke

TOP O' THE MORN FARMS
17324 Road 136
Tulare CA 93274
Office: 559-688-8100
Fax: 559-688-7272
MAIL
To: FRANKED-CA21@LS1.HOUSE.GOV
Subject: Please join Congressman Devin Nunes for an Open House
Date: 24-Nov-2009 16:15
Open House Postcard 2009.jpg [Save] [Open]
Message Id: 4B0C069C.VIS.PO4.200.2000016.1.12FEB6.1
Please join Congressman Devin Nunes
And his staff for an
Open House
Please stop by to learn about constituent services and
discuss issues I am working on in congress.
Monday, December 7, 2009
3:30 - 7:00 PM
113 N. Church Street, Suite 208
Visalia, CA 93291
Light refreshments will be served.
Please RSVP by December 4th.
(559) 733-3861
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Please join Congressman Devin Nunes

And his staff for an
Open House
Please stop by to learn about constituent services and
discuss issues I am working on in congress.
Monday, December 7, 2009
3:30 - 7:00 PM

Visalia, CA 93291
Light refreshments will be served.
Please RSVP by December 4th.

(559) 733-3861
MAIL
Subject: My Christmas Wish List
Date: 23-Dec-2009 10:38
Message Id: 4B31F32B.VIS.PO4.200.200001C.1.3F26E.1
Dear Friends,
Earlier today, I posted on my blog my Christmas list. If you have some

free time and a good sense of humor, please click here.
<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/2009/12/nunes-top-ten-christmas-wish-lis
t.html>
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Earlier today, I posted on my blog my Christmas list. If you have some free time and a good sense of humor,
please click here.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
MAIL
Subject: Congressional Water Town Hall
Date: 20-Jan-2010 09:34
Message Id: 4B56CE22.VIS.PO4.200.2000036.1.44BD0.1
Dear Friends,
Next week you will have an opportunity to have your voice heard
concerning our region's water crisis. Representative Tom McClintock,
Ranking Republican of the House Natural Resources Committee, will chair
a Congressional forum/town hall during which expert witnesses and the
general public will have an opportunity to speak.
The town hall will take place at the Fresno City Council Chambers on
Monday, January 25th at 8:30 am (2600 Fresno Street, 2nd Floor).
I will be there and hope you can make it too. Also, please pass this
information along to your friends and family. We need a strong turnout
and hope to have your support.
Sincerely,
image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Next week you will have an opportunity to have your voice heard concerning our region’s water
crisis. Representative Tom McClintock, Ranking Republican of the House Natural Resources Committee,
will chair a Congressional forum/town hall during which expert witnesses and the general public will have
an opportunity to speak.
The town hall will take place at the Fresno City Council Chambers on Monday, January 25th at 8:30 am
(2600 Fresno Street, 2nd Floor).
I will be there and hope you can make it too. Also, please pass this information along to your friends and
family. We need a strong turnout and hope to have your support.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
MAIL
From: Nicky.Henderson@mail.house.gov
To: Rep Nunes
Subject: Congressional Water Town Hall
Date: 22-Jan-2010 08:35
Message Id: 4B596369.VIS.PO4.200.2000006.1.24BCD2.1
Dear Friends,
Next week you will have an opportunity to have your voice heard concerning our region’s water crisis. Representative
Tom McClintock, Ranking Republican of the House Natural Resources Committee, will chair a Congressional forum/town
hall during which expert witnesses and the general public will have an opportunity to speak.
The town hall will take place at the Fresno City Council Chambers on Monday, January 25th at 8:30 am (2600 Fresno
Street, 2nd Floor).
I will be there and hope you can make it too. Also, please pass this information along to your friends and family. We need
a strong turnout and hope to have your support.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Next week you will have an opportunity to have your voice heard concerning our region’s water
crisis. Representative Tom McClintock, Ranking Republican of the House Natural Resources Committee,
will chair a Congressional forum/town hall during which expert witnesses and the general public will have
an opportunity to speak.
The town hall will take place at the Fresno City Council Chambers on Monday, January 25th at 8:30 am
(2600 Fresno Street, 2nd Floor).
I will be there and hope you can make it too. Also, please pass this information along to your friends and
family. We need a strong turnout and hope to have your support.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
MAIL
Subject: Water Town Hall Update
Date: 22-Jan-2010 12:54
Message Id: 4B599FFA.VIS.PO4.200.20000B2.1.44399.1
Dear Friends,
The ineptness of Secretary Salazar and the Department of Interior

continues unchecked. They refuse to turn on the pumps, they refuse to
build the two gates project, and now they refuse to attend a water town
hall in Fresno on Monday - a town hall in which they would hear directly
from the citizens.
Read for yourself - this is the statement they sent...
"Because of other commitments, particularly the NAS panel meeting

happening the same day in Davis, the Department of the Interior will be
unable to send a representative to the event. We are aware of the
severe economic and social impacts on Central Valley communities of the
water supply situation. Representatives of the Department, including
the Secretary and Deputy Secretary, have traveled to the Central Valley
and learned first-hand of the conditions caused by the current drought.
The department wants the residents of the Central Valley to know of our
continuing attention to and concern over this situation, and that we
remain committed to taking short and long-term actions that can address
the situation."
They have said the same thing for a year! When will they actually do
something?
I urge you to attend this town hall at the Fresno City Council Chambers,
2600 Fresno Street, 2nd floor, Fresno, California on Monday, January 25,
2010 at 8:30am. Diverse witnesses will be invited to testify and
members of the public will have the opportunity to speak.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
The ineptness of Secretary Salazar and the Department of Interior continues unchecked. They refuse to turn
on the pumps, they refuse to build the two gates project, and now they refuse to attend a water town hall in
Fresno on Monday – a town hall in which they would hear directly from the citizens.
Read for yourself – this is the statement they sent…
“Because of other commitments, particularly the NAS panel meeting happening the same day in Davis, the
Department of the Interior will be unable to send a representative to the event. We are aware of the severe
economic and social impacts on Central Valley communities of the water supply situation. Representatives
of the Department, including the Secretary and Deputy Secretary, have traveled to the Central Valley and
learned first-hand of the conditions caused by the current drought. The department wants the residents of
the Central Valley to know of our continuing attention to and concern over this situation, and that we remain
committed to taking short and long-term actions that can address the situation.”
They have said the same thing for a year! When will they actually do something?
I urge you to attend this town hall at the Fresno City Council Chambers, 2600 Fresno Street, 2nd floor,
Fresno, California on Monday, January 25, 2010 at 8:30am. Diverse witnesses will be invited to testify
and members of the public will have the opportunity to speak.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
MAIL
Subject: Fish Screen Stimulus
Date: 04-Feb-2010 15:24
Message Id: 4B6AE6A7.VIS.PO4.200.200008A.1.3F1B5.1
Dear Friends,
Today, the House Resources Committee held yet another hearing on the
California water crisis. Predictably, the Democratic leadership blocked
consideration of any legislation that would actually make a difference.
However, the American people are finally seeing the fruits of many
months of hard work on the part of Congressional Democrats. Speaker
Nancy Pelosi and her team now plan to pass legislation that authorizes
stimulus money to be used on fish screens (I'm not joking). Apparently,
smelt, salmon and killer whales everywhere are celebrating Congress'
commitment to the environment. But food lines in the valley are getting
longer and no relief to the government-imposed drought is in sight.
My testimony <http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes> and several

other clips have been posted YouTube. Please click here to watch.
The hearing today came on the heels of another propaganda victory by

radical environmentalists - this time in the Sacramento Bee. In a 2,500
word <http://www.sacbee.com/opinion/story/2500954.html> editorial, long
by any editorial standard, a radical environmentalist associated with
High Country News boldly attempted to re-write history. Using the
regurgitated talking points of President Obama's water czar David Hayes,
the author sought to marginalize my effort to turn on the pumps. Read
<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/2010/02/fish-screen-stimulus.html> more
about the column in the Bee on my blog (click here).
Thanks for your interest in these important issues. If you have

questions or comments about this issue or any other issue, please let me
know. As always, the best way to reach me is via my homepage
<http://www.nunes.house.gov/> . I can also be found on Facebook
<http://www.facebook.com/rep.nunes> .
Sincerely,
image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Today, the House Resources Committee held yet another hearing on the California water crisis. Predictably,
the Democratic leadership blocked consideration of any legislation that would actually make a difference.
However, the American people are finally seeing the fruits of many months of hard work on the part of
Congressional Democrats. Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her team now plan to pass legislation that authorizes
stimulus money to be used on fish screens (I’m not joking). Apparently, smelt, salmon and killer whales
everywhere are celebrating Congress’ commitment to the environment. But food lines in the valley are
getting longer and no relief to the government-imposed drought is in sight.
My testimony and several other clips have been posted YouTube. Please click here to watch.
The hearing today came on the heels of another propaganda victory by radical environmentalists – this time
in the Sacramento Bee. In a 2,500 word editorial, long by any editorial standard, a radical environmentalist
associated with High Country News boldly attempted to re-write history. Using the regurgitated talking
points of President Obama’s water czar David Hayes, the author sought to marginalize my effort to turn on
the pumps. Read more about the column in the Bee on my blog (click here).
Thanks for your interest in these important issues. If you have questions or comments about this issue or any
other issue, please let me know. As always, the best way to reach me is via my homepage. I can also be
found on Facebook.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
MAIL
Subject: Fish Screen Stimulus
Date: 04-Feb-2010 15:29
Message Id: 4B6AE7BD.VIS.PO4.200.20000C8.1.6B159.1
Dear Friends,
Today, the House Resources Committee held yet another hearing on the
California water crisis. Predictably, the Democratic leadership blocked
consideration of any legislation that would actually make a difference.
However, the American people are finally seeing the fruits of many
months of hard work on the part of Congressional Democrats. Speaker
Nancy Pelosi and her team now plan to pass legislation that authorizes
stimulus money to be used on fish screens (I'm not joking). Apparently,
smelt, salmon and killer whales everywhere are celebrating Congress'
commitment to the environment. But food lines in the valley are getting
longer and no relief to the government-imposed drought is in sight.
My testimony <http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes> and several

other clips have been posted YouTube. Please click here to watch.
The hearing today came on the heels of another propaganda victory by

radical environmentalists - this time in the Sacramento Bee. In a 2,500
word <http://www.sacbee.com/opinion/story/2500954.html> editorial, long
by any editorial standard, a radical environmentalist associated with
High Country News boldly attempted to re-write history. Using the
regurgitated talking points of President Obama's water czar David Hayes,
the author sought to marginalize my effort to turn on the pumps. Read
<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/2010/02/fish-screen-stimulus.html> more
about the column in the Bee on my blog (click here).
Thanks for your interest in these important issues. If you have

questions or comments about this issue or any other issue, please let me
know. As always, the best way to reach me is via my homepage
<http://www.nunes.house.gov/> . I can also be found on Facebook
<http://www.facebook.com/rep.nunes> .
Sincerely,
image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Today, the House Resources Committee held yet another hearing on the California water crisis. Predictably,
the Democratic leadership blocked consideration of any legislation that would actually make a difference.
However, the American people are finally seeing the fruits of many months of hard work on the part of
Congressional Democrats. Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her team now plan to pass legislation that authorizes
stimulus money to be used on fish screens (I’m not joking). Apparently, smelt, salmon and killer whales
everywhere are celebrating Congress’ commitment to the environment. But food lines in the valley are
getting longer and no relief to the government-imposed drought is in sight.
My testimony and several other clips have been posted YouTube. Please click here to watch.
The hearing today came on the heels of another propaganda victory by radical environmentalists – this time
in the Sacramento Bee. In a 2,500 word editorial, long by any editorial standard, a radical environmentalist
associated with High Country News boldly attempted to re-write history. Using the regurgitated talking
points of President Obama’s water czar David Hayes, the author sought to marginalize my effort to turn on
the pumps. Read more about the column in the Bee on my blog (click here).
Thanks for your interest in these important issues. If you have questions or comments about this issue or any
other issue, please let me know. As always, the best way to reach me is via my homepage. I can also be
found on Facebook.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
MAIL
Subject: Paid Internships Available in Visalia and Clovis
Date: 16-Feb-2010 16:04
Message Id: 4B7AC210.VIS.PO4.200.20000E5.1.1BBAB.1
Dear Friends,
I currently have paid internships available in my Clovis and Visalia

offices. If you know someone who is interested in politics, wants to
gain professional experience, and can excel in a fast-paced environment,
please pass along this message.
Interns provide critical staff support functions, are often called on to

work events, conduct research, and help with special projects. The
application process is ongoing and I accept both part-time and full time
applicants.
All prospective interns must have a high school diploma and be enrolled
or recently graduated from a college or university. An application can
be downloaded from my website at www.nunes.house.gov
<http://www.nunes.house.gov> .
If you have questions about my intern program, please call 559-733-3861.

Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I currently have paid internships available in my Clovis and Visalia offices. If you know someone who is
interested in politics, wants to gain professional experience, and can excel in a fast-paced environment,
Interns provide critical staff support functions, are often called on to work events, conduct research, and help
with special projects. The application process is ongoing and I accept both part-time and full time
applicants.
All prospective interns must have a high school diploma and be enrolled or recently graduated from a college
or university. An application can be downloaded from my website at www.nunes.house.gov.
If you have questions about my intern program, please call 559-733-3861.
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
MAIL
Subject: A Sensible Plan For California
Date: 18-Feb-2010 16:16
Message Id: 4B7D67D8.VIS.PO4.200.20000C8.1.6B9D0.1
Dear Friends,
Yesterday, I announced that I will be introducing a package of legislation to resolve California's

<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes#p/u/0/Twd59PrqCNg> water problems permanently. My plan, known as
the California Water Reliability Act, provides immediate relief but also will ensure that water is available for urban,
agricultural and environmental purposes for the long-term.
Here are main provisions of the bill:
Ø Temporarily waive the Endangers Species Act on the Delta pumps until a new Delta bypass is built;
Ø Fast-track construction of a Delta bypass;
Ø Fast-track construction of new surface water storage facilities (including Temperance Flat);
Ø Fast-track construction of water circulation projects, primarily South of the Delta, to ease water transfers;
Ø Rewrite the San Joaquin River Settlement to refocus efforts on a more financially feasible and environmentally
sustainable warm water fishery;
Ø Reform and improve the Central Valley Project Improvement Act to ensure the law attains measureable goals;
As always, I appreciate your interest in this important issue. Please feel free to visit my website for additional information
on this or any other issue before Congress.
Sincerely,
image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/> cid:image004.jpg@01CA0C65.39471370 <http://www.facebook.com/people/Devin-

Nunes/1693459598> cid:image003.jpg@01CA0C65.39471370 <http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Yesterday, I announced that I will be introducing a package of legislation to resolve California’s water
problems permanently. My plan, known as the California Water Reliability Act, provides immediate relief
but also will ensure that water is available for urban, agricultural and environmental purposes for the long-
term.
Here are main provisions of the bill:
Ø Temporarily waive the Endangers Species Act on the Delta pumps until a new Delta bypass is built;
Ø Fast-track construction of a Delta bypass;
Ø Fast-track construction of new surface water storage facilities (including Temperance Flat);
Ø Fast-track construction of water circulation projects, primarily South of the Delta, to ease water
transfers;
Ø Rewrite the San Joaquin River Settlement to refocus efforts on a more financially feasible and
environmentally sustainable warm water fishery;
Ø Reform and improve the Central Valley Project Improvement Act to ensure the law attains
measureable goals;
As always, I appreciate your interest in this important issue. Please feel free to visit my website for
additional information on this or any other issue before Congress.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
MAIL
Subject: Dust Bowl Democrats
Date: 26-Feb-2010 11:32
Message Id: 4B87B135.VIS.PO4.200.2000062.1.687F0.1
Dear Friends,
Today, the U.S. Department of Interior (DOI) released expected water

allocations for 2010. I have posted a blog on the subject, which you
can read by clicking here.
<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/2010/02/dustbowl-democrats.html>
The government-imposed drought continues. Buried at the end of the DOI

announcement is the following quote:
"Under this scenario, some junior agricultural interests north and south
of the Delta would receive an allocation of 5 percent of their water
service contracts."
Please check out my blog for more information.

Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

FRiday, February 26, 2010
Dust Bowl Democrats

As you will recall, on February 11th the Dust Bowl Democrats public
relations machine touted a new water amendment that would mandate 40% of
normal deliveries to our region. Despite the fact that nobody was
allowed to read the proposal, valley newspapers, Democrats and farm
groups naively rallied to support it.
I have been heavily criticized for suggesting valley residents read and
understand the Democrats' proposal prior to endorsing it- particularly
since many of our region's "leaders" did not do so themselves. For my
part, I was not willing to jump onto the Dustbowl bandwagon for the sake
of political expedience, good press or some misguided notion of
bi-partisanship (CLICK HERE FOR MORE).
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Today, the U.S. Department of Interior (DOI) released expected water allocations for 2010. I have posted a
blog on the subject, which you can read by clicking here.
The government-imposed drought continues. Buried at the end of the DOI announcement is the following
quote:
“Under this scenario, some junior agricultural interests north and south of the Delta would receive an
allocation of 5 percent of their water service contracts.”
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
If you would like to contact me, please visit my website at www.nunes.house.gov. If you would like to be
removed from my mailing list, please send a message to LISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.GOV with the text
Dust Bowl Democrats
As you will recall, on February 11th the Dust Bowl Democrats public relations machine touted a new water
amendment that would mandate 40% of normal deliveries to our region. Despite the fact that nobody was
allowed to read the proposal, valley newspapers, Democrats and farm groups naively rallied to support it.
I have been heavily criticized for suggesting valley residents read and understand the Democrats’ proposal
prior to endorsing it— particularly since many of our region’s “leaders” did not do so themselves. For my
part, I was not willing to jump onto the Dustbowl bandwagon for the sake of political expedience, good press
or some misguided notion of bi-partisanship (CLICK HERE FOR MORE).
MAIL
Subject: Dust Bowl Democrats
Date: 26-Feb-2010 11:27
Message Id: 4B87B037.VIS.PO4.200.2000045.1.40E7E.1
Dear Friends,
Today, the U.S. Department of Interior (DOI) released expected water

allocations for 2010. I have posted a blog on the subject, which you
can read by clicking here.
The government-imposed drought continues. Buried at the end of the DOI

announcement is the following quote:
"Under this scenario, some junior agricultural interests north and south
of the Delta would receive an allocation of 5 percent of their water
service contracts."

Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

Dust Bowl Democrats

As you will recall, on February 11th the Dust Bowl Democrats public
relations machine touted a new water amendment that would mandate 40% of
normal deliveries to our region. Despite the fact that nobody was
allowed to read the proposal, valley newspapers, Democrats and farm
groups naively rallied to support it.
I have been heavily criticized for suggesting valley residents read and
understand the Democrats' proposal prior to endorsing it- particularly
since many of our region's "leaders" did not do so themselves. For my
part, I was not willing to jump onto the Dustbowl bandwagon for the sake
of political expedience, good press or some misguided notion of
bi-partisanship (CLICK HERE FOR MORE).
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Today, the U.S. Department of Interior (DOI) released expected water allocations for 2010. I have posted a
blog on the subject, which you can read by clicking here.
The government-imposed drought continues. Buried at the end of the DOI announcement is the following
quote:
“Under this scenario, some junior agricultural interests north and south of the Delta would receive an
allocation of 5 percent of their water service contracts.”
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
Dust Bowl Democrats
As you will recall, on February 11th the Dust Bowl Democrats public relations machine touted a new water
amendment that would mandate 40% of normal deliveries to our region. Despite the fact that nobody was
allowed to read the proposal, valley newspapers, Democrats and farm groups naively rallied to support it.
I have been heavily criticized for suggesting valley residents read and understand the Democrats’ proposal
prior to endorsing it— particularly since many of our region’s “leaders” did not do so themselves. For my
part, I was not willing to jump onto the Dustbowl bandwagon for the sake of political expedience, good press
or some misguided notion of bi-partisanship (CLICK HERE FOR MORE).
MAIL
Subject: Unnatural Greenies: The Two Faces of Radical Environmentalism
Date: 12-Mar-2010 14:36
Message Id: 4B9A5155.VIS.PO4.200.2000022.1.32A45.1
Dear Friends,
I
<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/2010/03/unnatural-greenies-two-faces-of-
radical.html> posted a blog today commenting on the two faces of the
radical environmental movement.
In one instance, Oregon wildlife officials are protecting salmon by

literally bombing and shooting sea lions. Not all that far away, on the
beaches of southern California, similar well intentioned activists are
working to save starving sea lion pups that have washed ashore due to
malnutrition (click below for details).
Unnatural
radical.html> Greenies: The Two Faces of Radical Environmentalism
The
radical.html> Natural Resources Defense Council, Defenders of Wildlife,
Sierra Club and others tell us that the reason the San Joaquin Valley
needs to be transformed into a desert is because the Delta pumps are
destroying the salmon population and the water is desperately needed to
save the Delta ecosystem.
To
radical.html> this end, environmental radicals, operating in the name
of Gaia, Mother Earth, the wiccan religion and a host of other cult-like
organizations, have litigated, legislated and extorted away the water
needed for San Joaquin Valley communities.
radical.html>
Yet
radical.html> despite their ability to command the agenda of our
government through powerful alliances in Congress, none of the
endangered fish have shown signs of recovery. Actually, more species are
in danger today than when the water diversions started, according to the
EPA.
radical.html>
So
radical.html> what do you do if you are a green radical whose agenda is
losing credibility? Apparently you start attacking sea lions. Within the
last few days, we have again witnessed the ludicrous nature of the
extreme environmental movement.
Thank you for your support and interest.
Sincerely,
image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I posted a blog today commenting on the two faces of the radical environmental movement.
In one instance, Oregon wildlife officials are protecting salmon by literally bombing and shooting sea
lions. Not all that far away, on the beaches of southern California, similar well intentioned activists are
working to save starving sea lion pups that have washed ashore due to malnutrition (click below for details).
Unnatural Greenies: The Two Faces of Radical Environmentalism
The Natural Resources Defense Council, Defenders of Wildlife, Sierra Club and others tell us that the
reason the San Joaquin Valley needs to be transformed into a desert is because the Delta pumps are
destroying the salmon population and the water is desperately needed to save the Delta ecosystem.
To this end, environmental radicals, operating in the name of Gaia, Mother Earth, the wiccan religion
and a host of other cult-like organizations, have litigated, legislated and extorted away the water
Yet despite their ability to command the agenda of our government through powerful alliances in
Congress, none of the endangered fish have shown signs of recovery. Actually, more species are in
danger today than when the water diversions started, according to the EPA.
So what do you do if you are a green radical whose agenda is losing credibility? Apparently you start
attacking sea lions. Within the last few days, we have again witnessed the ludicrous nature of the

Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
MAIL
Subject: Unnatural Greenies: The Two Faces of Radical Environmentalism
Date: 12-Mar-2010 14:37
Message Id: 4B9A51AB.VIS.PO4.200.200002E.1.28538.1
Dear Friends,
I
radical.html> posted a blog today commenting on the two faces of the
radical environmental movement.
In one instance, Oregon wildlife officials are protecting salmon by

literally bombing and shooting sea lions. Not all that far away, on the
beaches of southern California, similar well intentioned activists are
working to save starving sea lion pups that have washed ashore due to
malnutrition (click below for details).
Unnatural
radical.html> Greenies: The Two Faces of Radical Environmentalism
The
radical.html> Natural Resources Defense Council, Defenders of Wildlife,
Sierra Club and others tell us that the reason the San Joaquin Valley
needs to be transformed into a desert is because the Delta pumps are
destroying the salmon population and the water is desperately needed to
save the Delta ecosystem.
To
radical.html> this end, environmental radicals, operating in the name
of Gaia, Mother Earth, the wiccan religion and a host of other cult-like
organizations, have litigated, legislated and extorted away the water
radical.html>
Yet
radical.html> despite their ability to command the agenda of our
government through powerful alliances in Congress, none of the
endangered fish have shown signs of recovery. Actually, more species are
in danger today than when the water diversions started, according to the
EPA.
radical.html>
So
radical.html> what do you do if you are a green radical whose agenda is
losing credibility? Apparently you start attacking sea lions. Within the
last few days, we have again witnessed the ludicrous nature of the
Sincerely,
image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I posted a blog today commenting on the two faces of the radical environmental movement.
In one instance, Oregon wildlife officials are protecting salmon by literally bombing and shooting sea
lions. Not all that far away, on the beaches of southern California, similar well intentioned activists are
working to save starving sea lion pups that have washed ashore due to malnutrition (click below for details).
Unnatural Greenies: The Two Faces of Radical Environmentalism
The Natural Resources Defense Council, Defenders of Wildlife, Sierra Club and others tell us that the
reason the San Joaquin Valley needs to be transformed into a desert is because the Delta pumps are
destroying the salmon population and the water is desperately needed to save the Delta ecosystem.
To this end, environmental radicals, operating in the name of Gaia, Mother Earth, the wiccan religion
and a host of other cult-like organizations, have litigated, legislated and extorted away the water
Yet despite their ability to command the agenda of our government through powerful alliances in
Congress, none of the endangered fish have shown signs of recovery. Actually, more species are in
danger today than when the water diversions started, according to the EPA.
So what do you do if you are a green radical whose agenda is losing credibility? Apparently you start
attacking sea lions. Within the last few days, we have again witnessed the ludicrous nature of the

Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
MAIL
Subject: Join Rep. Nunes and Special Guest Leader John Boehner
Date: 16-Mar-2010 14:38
Rep Nunes April 8 With Rep Boehner Email Comp.pdf [Save] [Open]
Message Id: 4B9F97D6.VIS.PO4.200.2000087.1.1E1AC.1
Complimentary Guest Invitation
You are Invited

to a Fundraising Reception in Support of
Congressman Devin Nunes (R-CA21)
and Special Guest
Republican Leader of the US House of Representatives
John Boehner (R-OH8)
Thursday - April 8, 2010
5:30-7:30 P.M.
At the Home of
Kevin & Nina Kruse
1830 W. Manor Drive
Visalia, CA 93291
Please RSVP by April 2nd on the attached form.
Questions-please call (559) 739-8903.
Paid for and Authorized by the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee
Contributions to the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee are not tax deductible
for federal income tax purposes. Federal law requires us to use our best
efforts to collect and report the name, mailing address, occupation and name
of employer of each individual whose contributions exceed $200 in an
election cycle. Contributions by corporations, labor unions, federal
contractors, and foreign nationals are prohibited. Individuals may
contribute up to $2,400 per election (primary and general) for a total of
$4,800. Federal multi-candidate PAC's may contribute up to $5,000 per
election (primary and general) for a total of $10,000.
___________________________________________________
Congressman Devin Nunes Campaign Committee
FEC# C00370056
PO Box 6545
Visalia, CA 93290
Cell 559.250.8775
Office 559.739.8903
Fax 559.739.8994
EFax 888.412.3824
www.DevinNunes.net
Nicky@DevinNunes.net
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Complimentary Guest Invitation
You are Invited

Congressman Devin
Nunes (R-CA21)
and Special Guest
Republican Leader of the US House of Representatives
John Boehner (R-OH8)
Thursday - April 8, 2010

5:30-7:30 P.M.
At the Home of
Kevin & Nina Kruse
1830 W. Manor Drive
Visalia, CA 93291
Please RSVP by April 2nd on the attached form.
Questions—please call (559) 739-8903.
Contributions to the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee are not tax deductible for federal income
tax purposes. Federal law requires us to use our best efforts to collect and report the name,
mailing address, occupation and name of employer of each individual whose contributions exceed
$200 in an election cycle. Contributions by corporations, labor unions, federal contractors, and
foreign nationals are prohibited. Individuals may contribute up to $2,400 per election (primary and
general) for a total of $4,800. Federal multi-candidate PAC’s may contribute up to $5,000 per
election (primary and general) for a total of $10,000.
___________________________________________________
FEC# C00370056
PO Box 6545
Visalia, CA 93290
Cell 559.250.8775
Office 559.739.8903
Fax 559.739.8994
EFax 888.412.3824
www.DevinNunes.net
MAIL
Subject: Health Bill Passage: The Crazies are in Charge
Date: 22-Mar-2010 09:03
Message Id: 4BA7325F.VIS.PO4.200.200004C.1.314FE.1
Dear Friends,
Last night, the House passed the Senate healthcare reform bill. Prior
to the vote, I appeared on C-SPAN's
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSv0VyrOIls&feature=channel> Washington
Journal and FOX <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBZaY-D8aB8> News (Sean
Hannity).
To view my brief remarks on the House Floor, click here

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auJ4VtdAd7w> . To
<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/2010/03/laying-cornerstone-of-socialist-
utopia.html> read my statement on passage of the Democratic bill, click
here. (my statement is posted on The Flash Report
<http://www.flashreport.org/> , as well as my
<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/2010/03/laying-cornerstone-of-socialist-
utopia.html> blog)
Thank you for your interest in this important issue. Please

<https://nunes.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactUs.ContactForm>
call or write if you have any questions about the new healthcare law or
any other issue before Congress.
Sincerely,
image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Last night, the House passed the Senate healthcare reform bill. Prior to the vote, I appeared on C-SPAN’s
Washington Journal and FOX News (Sean Hannity).
To view my brief remarks on the House Floor, click here. To read my statement on passage of the
Democratic bill, click here. (my statement is posted on The Flash Report, as well as my blog)
Thank you for your interest in this important issue. Please call or write if you have any questions about the
new healthcare law or any other issue before Congress.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
MAIL
Subject: Soviet Socialism, American Leftists, and European PIGS
Date: 01-Apr-2010 15:44
Message Id: 4BB4BF54.VIS.PO4.200.2000005.1.1E77A6.1
Dear Friends,
Today, the Flash Report ran another in a series of editorials I will be

writing. The latest is entitled Soviet
<http://www.flashreport.org/featured-columns-library0b.php?faID=20100401
02233164> Socialism, American Leftists, and European PIGS.
For your convenience, I have included the editorial in this email.
Thanks again for your continued support and interest in my work.
Sincerely,
image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

<http://www.nunes.house.gov/> www.nunes.house.gov. If you would like to
be removed from my mailing list, please send a message to
<mailto:LISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.GOV> LISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.GOV with the text
Soviet
02233164> Socialism, American Leftists, and European PIGS
Published
02233164> by The Flash Report
We have heard a lot lately about my comments relating Obamacare to the

failed socialist policies of the Soviet Union. Liberals and a host of
radical leftists have mocked my observation in their blogs and some
mainstream news outlets have even poked fun at me. However, the
transformation of America is no laughing matter.
The parallels between leftist policies today and those of failed

socialist states are undeniable; so much so that even a Russian
state-owned news commentator was forced to concede my point:
"Republican <http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20100322/158280635.html> Devin

Nunes accused the bill of continuing the failed Soviet experiment. He
was overly emotional but there is a grain of truth in what he said...
Apparently, the socialist experience has proved too tempting to be
resisted." (RIANOVOSTI News, March 22, 2010)
Thanks to increasing regulation, rising taxes and greater centralization
of power in Washington America is slowly leaving behind the foundation
of its economic strength; namely the entrepreneurial energy that comes
from freedom. And while a full-fledged Marxist revolution may not be on
the horizon, the transformation of America in the image of European
socialism is real and it should be of great concern to us all.
The most obvious example of failed central planning remains the Soviet
Union. However, failed socialist policies are not limited to the history
books. Consider the economic decline and social unrest in Europe.
As a result of government dominance throughout the European economy,

member states are facing the current global economic crisis with limited
options. The direct pain confronting Europeans is therefore magnified,
just as the prospects for economic recovery are limited. These
limitations are practical, resulting from the patchwork of laws and
regulations imposed on their economies, as well as political, the result
of mass dependence on government programs-a dependence shared by all but
a handful of wealthy elites.
Evidence of this fact is widely available today. For example, French

leaders recently cut federal spending in an attempt to address their
national debt crisis. The cuts, however, resulted in massive general
strikes, as well as social unrest-riots, looting and mass
demonstrations.
Throughout Europe political leaders have been burned in effigy by

protestors. They are being forced to choose between social order and
financial order. Pay cuts for government employees, for example, result
in general strikes. More radical reforms, including those needed for
long-term economic health, can't even be discussed openly.
In the final analysis, without the support of the masses, EU governments
are left without the ability to change course and are forced to preside
over national decline. I refer to this condition as an economic death
spiral.
EU democracies face this threat because deficit spending cannot sustain

an economy long-term. At some point, foreign lenders will resist
additional financing-a problem already faced by a group of European
countries known as the PIGS. The PIGS are Portugal, Ireland, Greece, and
Spain. Together they have a combined debt of approximately $198 billion.
Spain's
<https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/sp.htm
l> debt is highest, at $116 billion, followed by Greece
<https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/gr.htm
l> at $37 billion, Ireland
<https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ei.htm
l> at $30 billion and Portugal
<https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/po.htm
l> at $15 billion.
Some have suggested these nations could be the first in the developed
world to default on their credit obligations but the more likely
scenario is that they will face long-term economic stagnation. This
means high unemployment, high interest rates and little prospect for
improvement.
Interestingly, you don't have to look as far as Europe to find such as

doomsday scenario. Leftists in California have driven the state to the
brink of bankruptcy with a deficit
<http://www.lao.ca.gov/2009/bud/fiscal_outlook/fiscal_outlook_111809.asp
x> of $20 billion. If major reforms are not enacted, California will
join the PIGS of Europe as another failed social democracy. Perhaps
worse, if Obamacare and other Democratic policies are allowed to
continue unaltered, America itself will join in this fate.
###
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Today, the Flash Report ran another in a series of editorials I will be writing. The latest is entitled Soviet
Socialism, American Leftists, and European PIGS.
For your convenience, I have included the editorial in this email.
Thanks again for your continued support and interest in my work.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
Soviet Socialism, American Leftists, and European PIGS
Published by The Flash Report

We have heard a lot lately about my comments relating Obamacare to the failed socialist policies of the
Soviet Union. Liberals and a host of radical leftists have mocked my observation in their blogs and some
mainstream news outlets have even poked fun at me. However, the transformation of America is no laughing
matter.
The parallels between leftist policies today and those of failed socialist states are undeniable; so much so that
even a Russian state-owned news commentator was forced to concede my point:
“Republican Devin Nunes accused the bill of continuing the failed Soviet experiment. He was overly
emotional but there is a grain of truth in what he said... Apparently, the socialist experience has proved too
tempting to be resisted.” (RIANOVOSTI News, March 22, 2010)
Thanks to increasing regulation, rising taxes and greater centralization of power in Washington America is
slowly leaving behind the foundation of its economic strength; namely the entrepreneurial energy that comes
from freedom. And while a full-fledged Marxist revolution may not be on the horizon, the transformation of
America in the image of European socialism is real and it should be of great concern to us all.
The most obvious example of failed central planning remains the Soviet Union. However, failed socialist
policies are not limited to the history books. Consider the economic decline and social unrest in Europe.
As a result of government dominance throughout the European economy, member states are facing the
current global economic crisis with limited options. The direct pain confronting Europeans is therefore
magnified, just as the prospects for economic recovery are limited. These limitations are practical, resulting
from the patchwork of laws and regulations imposed on their economies, as well as political, the result of
mass dependence on government programs—a dependence shared by all but a handful of wealthy elites.
Evidence of this fact is widely available today. For example, French leaders recently cut federal spending in
an attempt to address their national debt crisis. The cuts, however, resulted in massive general strikes, as well
as social unrest—riots, looting and mass demonstrations.
Throughout Europe political leaders have been burned in effigy by protestors. They are being forced to
choose between social order and financial order. Pay cuts for government employees, for example, result in
general strikes. More radical reforms, including those needed for long-term economic health, can’t even be
discussed openly.
In the final analysis, without the support of the masses, EU governments are left without the ability to
change course and are forced to preside over national decline. I refer to this condition as an economic death
spiral.
EU democracies face this threat because deficit spending cannot sustain an economy long-term. At some
point, foreign lenders will resist additional financing—a problem already faced by a group of European
countries known as the PIGS. The PIGS are Portugal, Ireland, Greece, and Spain. Together they have a
combined debt of approximately $198 billion. Spain’s debt is highest, at $116 billion, followed by Greece at
$37 billion, Ireland at $30 billion and Portugal at $15 billion.
Some have suggested these nations could be the first in the developed world to default on their credit
obligations but the more likely scenario is that they will face long-term economic stagnation. This means
high unemployment, high interest rates and little prospect for improvement.
Interestingly, you don’t have to look as far as Europe to find such as doomsday scenario. Leftists in
California have driven the state to the brink of bankruptcy with a deficit of $20 billion. If major reforms are
not enacted, California will join the PIGS of Europe as another failed social democracy. Perhaps worse, if
Obamacare and other Democratic policies are allowed to continue unaltered, America itself will join in this
fate.
###
MAIL
Subject: Join me in support of Carly Fiorina April 23rd.
Date: 16-Apr-2010 12:43
Fiorina Visalia-Nunes.pdf [Save] [Open]
Message Id: 4BC85B6B.VIS.PO4.200.20000D5.1.2A014.1
Dear Friends,
As you may know I have endorsed Carly Fiorina who is running to defeat
Barbara Boxer. Attached is information on an event in Visalia at the home
of Shelly & Don Groppetti. Carly is the best candidate to beat Barbara
Boxer and needs your support at this event. I look forward to seeing you
there.
Devin Nunes
Member of Congress (R-CA)
Congressman Devin Nunes,
Maurine & The Honorable Bill Jones,
along with the Central California Finance Committee
Invite You To A Reception for

Carly Fiorina
CANDIDATE FOR U.S. SENATE
Friday, April 23, 2010
At the home of
Shelly & Don Groppetti
32595-G Road 132
Visalia, California
Please see the attachment for more details.
Paid for by the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee
___________________________________________________
Nicky Henderson
Executive Director
FEC# C00370056
PO Box 6545
Visalia, CA 93290
Cell 559.250.8775
Office 559.739.8903
Fax 559.739.8994
EFax 888.412.3824
www.DevinNunes.net
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
As you may know I have endorsed Carly Fiorina who is running to defeat Barbara Boxer. Attached
is information on an event in Visalia at the home of Shelly & Don Groppetti. Carly is the best
candidate to beat Barbara Boxer and needs your support at this event. I look forward to seeing
you there.
Devin Nunes

Maurine & The Honorable Bill Jones,
along with the Central California Finance Committee
Invite You To A Reception for
Carly Fiorina
CANDIDATE FOR U.S. SENATE
Friday, April 23, 2010
At the home of
32595-G Road 132
Visalia, California
Please see the attachment for more details.
___________________________________________________
Nicky Henderson
Executive Director
FEC# C00370056
PO Box 6545
Visalia, CA 93290
Cell 559.250.8775
Office 559.739.8903
Fax 559.739.8994
EFax 888.412.3824
www.DevinNunes.net
MAIL
Subject: The Dimmer Switch in the Oval Office: Obama's Energy Rationing Plan
Date: 16-Apr-2010 15:14
Message Id: 4BC87EE5.VIS.PO4.200.2000001.1.1263F9.1
Dear Friends,
Two of President Obama's advisors testified before the House

<http://waysandmeans.house.gov/Hearings/hearingDetails.aspx?NewsID=11120
> Ways and Means Committee this week to discuss U.S. energy policy
(view my <http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes#p/u/0/EhmZHbrNX4I>
questions here). They focused on "green energy" yet were forced to admit
that windmills and solar panels will be inadequate to satisfy our
nation's growing needs (see details from my 2008
<http://nunes.house.gov/_files/WRMagazine000.pdf> report here).
Our nation's current energy supply is inadequate and we are dangerously

close to capacity in many regions - relying on outdated transmission and
generation systems. Consumers are paying the price with high rates, not
only in <http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/table5_6_b.html>
California but in many other states.
Furthermore, more than half of our energy comes from imports. This makes
the United States highly vulnerable to external pressures and
economically damaging price shocks - more
<http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/company_
level_imports/current/import.html> so than at any time in our history.
What is the Obama solution to this problem? Energy "productivity" and

government control are the linchpins of his plan. In this instance,
"productivity" is radical environmentalist code for high energy prices
and forced rationing. (You can see President Obama
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQsIBtwUh6Q> admitting high prices will
be part of his plan by clicking here).
If President Obama and his Democrat supermajorities in Congress have

their way, new government edicts and bureaucrats will dictate how you
use energy and under what circumstances energy consuming products can be
sold to Americans.
The Energy Star system, developed to inform consumers and encourage

conservation, will become an Energy Czar system with national laws that
mirror <http://reason.org/news/show/california-wants-to-ban-your-b>
California's outrageous policy banning big screen televisions. Economic
prosperity and affordable energy are directly linked. Without abundant
and affordable energy supplies to grow our economy, more jobs will be
sent to China and other nations that make actual energy production a
priority.
We can't let President Obama put a dimmer switch in the Oval Office -
where our consumption of energy will be subject to the whims of
Soviet-style resource allocators.
There is a better way.
I will soon be introducing a bill I am co-sponsoring with Rep. Paul Ryan

<http://www.house.gov/ryan/> called The Roadmap for America's Energy
Future, which is part of our lager Roadmap reform
<http://www.roadmap.republicans.budget.house.gov/> initiative. The bill
takes advantage of our nation's abundant fossil fuel resources, along
with extensive nuclear power development, to power America until
advanced alternatives are able to replace them.
Please keep an eye on my blog <http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/> and
website <http://nunes.house.gov/> for details in the coming weeks.
Sincerely,
image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Two of President Obama’s advisors testified before the House Ways and Means Committee this week to
discuss U.S. energy policy (view my questions here). They focused on “green energy” yet were forced to
admit that windmills and solar panels will be inadequate to satisfy our nation’s growing needs (see details
from my 2008 report here).
Our nation’s current energy supply is inadequate and we are dangerously close to capacity in many regions –
relying on outdated transmission and generation systems. Consumers are paying the price with high rates,
not only in California but in many other states.
Furthermore, more than half of our energy comes from imports. This makes the United States highly
vulnerable to external pressures and economically damaging price shocks – more so than at any time in our
history.
What is the Obama solution to this problem? Energy “productivity” and government control are the linchpins
of his plan. In this instance, “productivity” is radical environmentalist code for high energy prices and forced
rationing. (You can see President Obama admitting high prices will be part of his plan by clicking here).
If President Obama and his Democrat supermajorities in Congress have their way, new government edicts
and bureaucrats will dictate how you use energy and under what circumstances energy consuming products
can be sold to Americans.
The Energy Star system, developed to inform consumers and encourage conservation, will become an
Energy Czar system with national laws that mirror California’s outrageous policy banning big screen
televisions. Economic prosperity and affordable energy are directly linked. Without abundant and affordable
energy supplies to grow our economy, more jobs will be sent to China and other nations that make actual
energy production a priority.
We can’t let President Obama put a dimmer switch in the Oval Office – where our consumption of energy
will be subject to the whims of Soviet-style resource allocators.
There is a better way.
I will soon be introducing a bill I am co-sponsoring with Rep. Paul Ryan called The Roadmap for America’s
Energy Future, which is part of our lager Roadmap reform initiative. The bill takes advantage of our nation’s
abundant fossil fuel resources, along with extensive nuclear power development, to power America until
advanced alternatives are able to replace them.
Please keep an eye on my blog and website for details in the coming weeks.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
MAIL
Subject: Check out my new TV ads...
Date: 19-Apr-2010 22:55
Message Id: 4BCCDF65.VIS.PO4.200.20000AA.1.2F55C.1
Dear Friends,
Follow the YouTube link below to check out my new TV ads.
http://www.youtube.com/user/DevinNunes
Best regards,
Devin Nunes

___________________________________________________
FEC# C00370056
PO Box 6545
Visalia, CA 93290
Office 559.739.8903
Fax 559.739.8994
EFax 888.412.3824
www.DevinNunes.net
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Follow the YouTube link below to check out my new TV ads.
http://www.youtube.com/user/DevinNunes
Best regards,
Devin Nunes
___________________________________________________
FEC# C00370056
PO Box 6545
Visalia, CA 93290
Office 559.739.8903
Fax 559.739.8994
EFax 888.412.3824
www.DevinNunes.net
MAIL
Subject: Communist Cuba and The California Farm Bureau
Date: 29-Apr-2010 11:18
Message Id: 4BD96AFC.VIS.PO4.200.20000C4.1.19176.1
Dear Friends,
Earlier today, the

<http://waysandmeans.house.gov/subcommittees/Default.aspx/trade> House
Ways and Means Trade Subcommittee held a hearing to discuss the
liberalization of trade with
<http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2886.htm> Communist Dictator Fidel
Castro's government. You can see
<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes> video of the hearing here
[NUNES on <http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes#p/u/0/3zvB21Kq-rg>
YOUTUBE].
You can also read my full remarks to the committee below.
Thanks for your interest in my work in Congress.
Sincerely,
image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
<http://www.nunes.house.gov/> www.nunes.house.gov. If you would like to
be removed from my mailing list, please send a message to
<mailto:LISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.GOV> LISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.GOV with the text
HEARING REMARKS OF REP. DEVIN NUNES

Ways and Means Subcommittee on Trade
"I do not support liberalizing trade with Cuba, a nation governed by a

brutal Communist Dictatorship. To justify this initiative, some may draw
parallels with China or other foreign powers that have also been hostile
to American freedom. But make no mistake, Cuba is not China and these
comparisons are not valid. Here are a few reasons why:
* Cuba, not China, is stoking anti-American sentiment throughout the

Western Hemisphere and is openly hostile to our nation.
* Cuba is a state sponsor of terrorism - along with Iran, Syria, and

Sudan.
* Cuba is one of a handful of totalitarian states remaining in the

world, alongside Burma and North Korea.
* Trade with Cuba means trade with one company - Alimport. Any talk of
open trade with Cuba is a distortion. What we are talking about is open
trade with Castro's import/export regime.
Let me be clear, I am not defending Chinese currency manipulation. And I

believe the U.S. has many challenges ahead with respect to our
relationship with China. But it is inappropriate and dangerous to use
the China model of engagement for the brutal totalitarian regime in
Cuba.
And while I understand that American foreign policy has taken on a bold
new look and feel under the Obama Administration, I am compelled to ask
a basic question: Is this Congress seriously proposing to advance trade
with terrorist states before completing work on agreements with
Democratic allies and strategic partners?
Trade with Cuba is not a question of economics, it is a matter of

geopolitics and American national security.
I recognize that liberalization might make a few Americans a lot of

money. And I don't blame certain elements of our economy, including the
California Farm Bureau, for entertaining profits over the larger ideals
of freedom and national security.
To my knowledge, no members of the California Farm Bureau have been

murdered for their political views. Here is a picture depicting Cubans
murdered by the Castro regime. And it might come as a surprise to
supporters of trade with Cuba that killing a cow in that country,
without government permission, results in longer prison sentences than
killing a human being.
The California Farm Bureau and other exporters do not represent this
nation's national interests. The American people are tired of sectional
interests governing our country. As leaders, we are charged with the
responsibility of putting aside these narrow interests in favor of the
national interest.
As a Representative of California's number one agriculture district, I

can assure you I have done so with respect to Cuba.
Yet, I fear many of my colleagues have lost sight of this

responsibility.
While we discuss trade with Cuba, this committee has sat idle while
Congressional leaders have blocked consideration of vital agreements
with Columbia, Panama, and South Korea.
Our allies in Central and South America are under constant assault by
hostile powers - including Venezuela's Hugo Chavez. Without our support,
we leave these friendly Democracies at the mercy of anti America
sentiment and militant Marxist ideology.
So I ask, when will the House consider the Columbian and Panamanian
agreements?
And while we are asking questions, I would also like to know why so many
anti-trade Democrats - those responsible for holding up consideration of
important free trade agreements with our Democratic allies - are so
intent on liberalizing trade with the Communist Dictatorship in Cuba?
I understand that some in this House may share the Marxist views of
Castro and Chavez, but we must all recognize that American freedom is
incompatible with these regimes.
And quite frankly, with so many opportunities to enhance trade

relationships with democracies, it is utterly incomprehensible that time
and tax dollars are being wasted on Cuba. Yet here we sit.
I urge my Democratic colleagues to take a stand one way or the other.

Either end the waiting game currently confronting our allies - Columbia,
South Korea, and Panama, and give them a vote on their trade agreements.
Or kill them now and get on with your agenda.
Perhaps some of my colleagues would be more comfortable negotiating free

trade agreements with Iran, North Korea and Venezuela."
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Earlier today, theHouse Ways and Means Trade Subcommittee held a hearing to discuss the liberalization of
trade with Communist Dictator Fidel Castro’s government. You can see video of the hearing here [NUNES
on YOUTUBE].
You can also read my full remarks to the committee below.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message.
HEARING REMARKS OF REP. DEVIN NUNES

Ways and Means Subcommittee on Trade
"I do not support liberalizing trade with Cuba, a nation governed by a brutal Communist Dictatorship. To
justify this initiative, some may draw parallels with China or other foreign powers that have also been hostile
to American freedom. But make no mistake, Cuba is not China and these comparisons are not valid. Here are
a few reasons why:
• Cuba, not China, is stoking anti-American sentiment throughout the Western Hemisphere and is openly
hostile to our nation.
• Cuba is a state sponsor of terrorism – along with Iran, Syria, and Sudan.
• Cuba is one of a handful of totalitarian states remaining in the world, alongside Burma and North Korea.
• Trade with Cuba means trade with one company – Alimport. Any talk of open trade with Cuba is a
distortion. What we are talking about is open trade with Castro’s import/export regime.
Let me be clear, I am not defending Chinese currency manipulation. And I believe the U.S. has many
challenges ahead with respect to our relationship with China. But it is inappropriate and dangerous to use the
China model of engagement for the brutal totalitarian regime in Cuba.
And while I understand that American foreign policy has taken on a bold new look and feel under the Obama
Administration, I am compelled to ask a basic question: Is this Congress seriously proposing to advance
trade with terrorist states before completing work on agreements with Democratic allies and strategic
partners?
Trade with Cuba is not a question of economics, it is a matter of geopolitics and American national security.
I recognize that liberalization might make a few Americans a lot of money. And I don’t blame certain
elements of our economy, including the California Farm Bureau, for entertaining profits over the larger
ideals of freedom and national security.
To my knowledge, no members of the California Farm Bureau have been murdered for their political views.
Here is a picture depicting Cubans murdered by the Castro regime. And it might come as a surprise to
supporters of trade with Cuba that killing a cow in that country, without government permission, results in
longer prison sentences than killing a human being.
The California Farm Bureau and other exporters do not represent this nation’s national interests. The
American people are tired of sectional interests governing our country. As leaders, we are charged with the
responsibility of putting aside these narrow interests in favor of the national interest.
As a Representative of California’s number one agriculture district, I can assure you I have done so with
respect to Cuba.
Yet, I fear many of my colleagues have lost sight of this responsibility.
While we discuss trade with Cuba, this committee has sat idle while Congressional leaders have blocked
consideration of vital agreements with Columbia, Panama, and South Korea.
Our allies in Central and South America are under constant assault by hostile powers – including Venezuela’
s Hugo Chavez. Without our support, we leave these friendly Democracies at the mercy of anti America
sentiment and militant Marxist ideology.
So I ask, when will the House consider the Columbian and Panamanian agreements?
And while we are asking questions, I would also like to know why so many anti-trade Democrats - those
responsible for holding up consideration of important free trade agreements with our Democratic allies - are
so intent on liberalizing trade with the Communist Dictatorship in Cuba?
I understand that some in this House may share the Marxist views of Castro and Chavez, but we must all
recognize that American freedom is incompatible with these regimes.
And quite frankly, with so many opportunities to enhance trade relationships with democracies, it is utterly
incomprehensible that time and tax dollars are being wasted on Cuba. Yet here we sit.
I urge my Democratic colleagues to take a stand one way or the other. Either end the waiting game currently
confronting our allies – Columbia, South Korea, and Panama, and give them a vote on their trade
agreements. Or kill them now and get on with your agenda.
Perhaps some of my colleagues would be more comfortable negotiating free trade agreements with Iran,
North Korea and Venezuela."
MAIL
Subject: Wall Street Journal Features Nunes Energy Plan
Date: 30-Jul-2010 09:58
Message Id: 4C52A250.VIS.PO4.200.20000F2.1.62D01.1
Dear Friends,
This week I introduced "A Roadmap for America's Energy Future" - a companion bill to the comprehensive tax and budget
reforms contained in "A Roadmap for America's Future" (click here for details about the tax and budget reform
plan<http://www.roadmap.republicans.budget.house.gov/>).
Today, The Wall Street

Journal<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703578104575397652539348486.html?mod=googlenews_wsj>
featured a column in support of my plan. Click here to read it on my blog<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/>. If you want
more information about the Energy Roadmap, you can download the full bill text
(here<http://nunes.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=8940172b-4b73-4d82-acc6-
5d03a00dbea1>), the summary (here<http://nunes.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=72e9b8fd-
c2a9-41a7-9586-27038b617c3c>) and the section-by-section explanation
(here<http://nunes.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=09ccbb80-6ac3-4c07-99cc-
cb526a103ab5>). [all are available on my website]
In addition, this week I appeared on C-SPAN's The Washington Journal to discuss tax policy. You can watch the entire
broadcast by visiting my YouTube Channel (click here).<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>
Thank you for your interest in my work in Washington. Please feel free to call or write if you have questions about the
"Energy Roadmap" or the tax and budget reforms contained in "A Roadmap for America's Future."
Sincerely,
image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
If you would like to contact me, please visit my website at www.nunes.house.gov<http://www.nunes.house.gov/>. If you
would like to be removed from my mailing list, please send a message to
LISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.GOV<mailto:LISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.GOV> with the text "SIGNOFF NEWSLETTER-CA21"
in the body of the message.
cid:image002.jpg@01CA0C65.39471370<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>
cid:image004.jpg@01CA0C65.39471370<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
This week I introduced “A Roadmap for America’s Energy Future” – a companion bill to the
comprehensive tax and budget reforms contained in “A Roadmap for America’s Future” (click here for
details about the tax and budget reform plan).
Today, The Wall Street Journal featured a column in support of my plan. Click here to read it on my blog
. If you want more information about the Energy Roadmap, you can download the full bill text (here), the
summary (here) and the section-by-section explanation (here). [all are available on my website]
In addition, this week I appeared on C-SPAN’s The Washington Journal to discuss tax policy. You can
watch the entire broadcast by visiting my YouTube Channel (click here).
Thank you for your interest in my work in Washington. Please feel free to call or write if you have questions
about the “Energy Roadmap” or the tax and budget reforms contained in “A Roadmap for America’s
Future.”
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
From: nicky@devinnunes.net
To: devin@devinnunes.net
Subject: You are invited to an event with Damon Dunn - this Saturday Oct 9th
Date: 04-Oct-2010 11:32
Damon Dunn Reception 10-9-10 Complimentary.pdf [Save] [Open]
Message Id: 4CA9BB69.VIS.PO4.200.20000AA.1.33334.1
Please see the attached invitation and join us as a complimentary guest this
Saturday for an evening with Damon Dunn (Candidate for Secretary of State)
and special guests; Congressman Devin Nunes, Assemblywoman Jean Fuller
(Candidate for State Senate), Assemblywoman Connie Conway and Ray Appleton
(KMJ 580 Talk Radio Host). Please RSVP by Thursday October 7th.
Thank you,
Nicky
___________________________________________________
Nicky Henderson
Executive Director
FEC# C00370056
PO Box 6545
Visalia, CA 93290
Cell 559.250.8775
Office 559.739.8903
Fax 559.739.8994
EFax 888.412.3824
www.DevinNunes.net
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is

for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information or otherwise be protected by law. Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you
are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail
and destroy all copies of the original message.
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Please see the attached invitation and join us as a complimentary guest this Saturday for an evening with
Damon Dunn (Candidate for Secretary of State) and special guests; Congressman Devin Nunes,
Assemblywoman Jean Fuller (Candidate for State Senate), Assemblywoman Connie Conway and Ray
Appleton (KMJ 580 Talk Radio Host). Please RSVP by Thursday October 7th.
Thank you,
Nicky
___________________________________________________
Nicky Henderson
Executive Director
FEC# C00370056
PO Box 6545
Visalia, CA 93290
Cell 559.250.8775
Office 559.739.8903
Fax 559.739.8994
EFax 888.412.3824
www.DevinNunes.net
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential and privileged information or otherwise be protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original message.
MAIL
From: john@familiesprotectingthevalley.com
To: Steven Worthley
Subject: 8 Questions With Devin Nunes
Date: 07-Oct-2010 13:06
Message Id: 4CADC5CB.VIS.PO4.200.2000099.1.2095F.1
_VOLUME 2 ISSUE 37_
_October 7th 2010_

_:: IN THIS ISSUE_
_» [1]Congress V. Westlands V. Nunes
» [2]Nunes' WWII Comparison Roils California Water Fight_
Links:
1. http://www.familiesprotectingthevalley.com/topstory.php?ax=v&n=99&id=99&nid=385
Board of Directors
Denis Prosperi
Chester Andrew
Bob Smittcamp
Russ Waymire
John "Dusty" Giacone
Joe Marchini
Mark Watte
Kole Upton
Piedad Ayala
Tom Barcellos
Jim Walls
8 Questions With Devin Nunes
Families Protecting The Valley sent 8 questions to many candidates running

for state, federal and local elections. We were happy to see the responses
from some of the candidates and disappointed that others didn't take the
time to respond. We know that the issue of water in California has taken a
back seat to what some believe to be more important issues in this election
like the economy, the deficit, the bail-outs, the stimulus, healthcare, and
cap and trade...but to our organization and many others, water is still very
high on the priority list. Below we list the candidates who received our
questionairre, and those _in bold print _took the time to answer our
questions. We will be sending out our newsletter with responses from those
who answered our questions in the next couple of weeks. Today we give you
the answers from Congressman Devin Nunes.
Congressman Jim Costa

_Congressional Candidate Andy Vidak_
Congressman Dennis Cardoza

Congressional Candidate Mike Berryhill
Congressional Candidate Lorraine Goodwin

Congressional Candidate Jeff Denham
_Congressman Devin Nunes_
_Fresno County Supervisor Phil Larson

Candidate for Fresno County Supervisor Cynthia Sterling_
Candidate for State Senate Larry Johnson

Candidate for State Senate Tom Berryhill
_Candidate for State Senate Michael Rubio_

Candidate for State Senate Tim Thiesen
Candidate for State Assembly Tim Weintz

_Candidate for State Assembly Bill Berryhill_
Candidate for State Assembly Michael Esswein

Candidate for State Assembly Linda Halderman
_Candidate for State Assembly David Valadao_

Candidate for State Assembly Fran Florez
_Candidate for State Assembly Brandon Shoemaker_

Candidate for State Assembly Henry T. Perea
_8 Questions With Devin Nunes_
_1. Do you support card check and the elimination of the secret ballot
for union
elections?_
No, and I will vote against any such proposal. I believe unions should be
formed by
secret ballot and not by open elections where union bosses can intimidate
employees.
2. Three parts:
_a) Do you agree with the Obama administration's enforcement of the

current
existing immigration policies and laws?_
No, the Obama administration has failed to secure the border and has
continuously
impeded the construction of a border fence. Despite a promise of
immigration
reform, President Obama refuses to offer a legislative proposal.
_b) Do you believe legal immigration should be a state issue or a

federal issue?_
Securing our borders and dealing with legalized immigration is a federal

policy and
should remain so. However, the federal government has completely failed in
its
duties. This has left states vulnerable to illegal criminal elements and
has forced
state government to enforce federal immigration laws.
_c) What specific changes would you promote in immigration policy?_
We need to take immediate action to secure the border. After stopping

illegal
border crossings, we should proceed with implementing a sensible guest
worker
program.
_3. Will you offer amendments to the Central Valley Project Improvement
Act? If
yes, please specify priority changes._
Yes, reforming CVPIA is necessary to improve the water situation in the San
Joaquin
Valley. Consistent with legislation I proposed in 2005, the Central Valley
Project
Reform Act, we must move forward with legislation that recovers lost water
and
restores reasonable balance between competing water interests.
_4. Will you offer amendments to the San Joaquin River Settlement Act?
If so,
please specify priority changes._
Yes, I will propose to repeal and replace the San Joaquin River Settlement
with a
more environmentally sensible and fiscally feasible warm water fishery.
_5. Will you offer amendments to the Endangered Species Act? If yes,
please
specify your priorities and changes._
Yes, I will work with my colleagues to effect necessary changes that will
return
balance to the implementation of the law. First and foremost, we must amend
the law
to ensure that decisions to recover a species will take into account the
human and
economic impacts of the action.
_6. The State Water Resources Control Board appears headed towards a
decision
that would elevate environmental Delta flows above all other water rights
and
contracts. How would you protect federal water rights and contractual
obligations?_
Congress has the authority to preempt state law and protect personal
property
rights. If the State Water Resources Control Board take action to
prioritize
environmental water deliveries over existing water right law, I will
advocate swift
action in Congress to preempt their action.
_7. What is your position on upstream diversions from the Delta? In

particular
from Hetch Hetchy, Comanche and Pardee reservoirs?_
We must hold San Francisco accountable for their lack of contribution to

delta water
quality. In effect, they have their own peripheral canal where they pipe
water from
a pristine valley in Yosemite National Park around the delta and into homes
of
liberal elites. The San Francisco water users must be required to
contribute to the
health of the delta - either through sending water into the delta or
providing
financial support for projects that would improve the health of the delta.
_8. Will you support legislation to require tertiary treatment of

wastewater
discharged into the Delta and its associated waterways?_
If drafted appropriately, I will support legislation that will ensure that

all
discharges into the Delta meet the necessary water quality standards.
[3]view email in browser | [4]Unsubscribe sworthley@co.tulare.ca.us | [5]Update your profile

| [6]Forward to a friend
Links:
3. http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=b4e9d9db12&e=7f1c52f176
4. http://familiesprotectingthevalley.us1.list-
manage.com/unsubscribe?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=2b06a413ff&e=7f1c52f176&c=b4e9d9db12
manage2.com/profile?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=2b06a413ff&e=7f1c52f176
6. http://us1.forward-to-friend.com/forward?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=b4e9d9db12&e=7f1c52f176
You subscribed to this email to keep up to date about news about the environment and water situation of California's
Central Valley. Provided by Families Protecting The Valley at http://www.familiesprotectingthevalley.com
Families Protecting The Valley

11409 Road 26 1/2
Madera, California 93637
Copyright (C) 2010 Families Protecting The Valley All rights reserved.
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
VOLUME 2 ISSUE 37 October 7th 2010
:: IN THIS ISSUE
» Congress V. Westlands
V. Nunes
» Nunes' WWII
Comparison Roils 8 Questions With Devin Nunes
California Water Fight
Families Protecting The Valley sent 8 questions to many candidates running for state, federal and local elections. We
were happy to see the responses from some of the candidates and disappointed that others didn't take the time to
respond. We know that the issue of water in California has taken a back seat to what some believe to be more
important issues in this election like the economy, the deficit, the bail-outs, the stimulus, healthcare, and cap and
trade...but to our organization and many others, water is still very high on the priority list. Below we list the
candidates who received our questionairre, and those in bold print took the time to answer our questions. We will be
sending out our newsletter with responses from those who answered our questions in the next couple of
weeks. Today we give you the answers from Congressman Devin Nunes.
Congressman Jim Costa

Congressional Candidate Andy Vidak
Congressman Dennis Cardoza

Board of Directors Congressional Candidate Mike Berryhill
Congressional Candidate Lorraine Goodwin

Denis Prosperi Congressional Candidate Jeff Denham
Chester Andrew
Bob Smittcamp Congressman Devin Nunes
Russ Waymire Fresno County Supervisor Phil Larson
John "Dusty" Giacone Candidate for Fresno County Supervisor Cynthia Sterling
Joe Marchini
Mark Watte Candidate for State Senate Larry Johnson
Kole Upton Candidate for State Senate Tom Berryhill
Piedad Ayala Candidate for State Senate Michael Rubio
Tom Barcellos Candidate for State Senate Tim Thiesen
Jim Walls
Candidate for State Assembly Tim Weintz
Candidate for State Assembly Bill Berryhill
Candidate for State Assembly Michael Esswein

Candidate for State Assembly Linda Halderman
Candidate for State Assembly David Valadao

Candidate for State Assembly Fran Florez
Candidate for State Assembly Brandon Shoemaker

Candidate for State Assembly Henry T. Perea
8 Questions With Devin Nunes
1. Do you support card check and the elimination of the secret ballot for union
elections?
No, and I will vote against any such proposal. I believe unions should be formed by
secret ballot and not by open elections where union bosses can intimidate employees.
2. Three parts:
a) Do you agree with the Obama administration's enforcement of the current

existing immigration policies and laws?
No, the Obama administration has failed to secure the border and has continuously
impeded the construction of a border fence. Despite a promise of immigration
reform, President Obama refuses to offer a legislative proposal.
b) Do you believe legal immigration should be a state issue or a federal issue?
Securing our borders and dealing with legalized immigration is a federal policy and
should remain so. However, the federal government has completely failed in its
duties. This has left states vulnerable to illegal criminal elements and has forced
state government to enforce federal immigration laws.
c) What specific changes would you promote in immigration policy?
We need to take immediate action to secure the border. After stopping illegal
border crossings, we should proceed with implementing a sensible guest worker
program.
3. Will you offer amendments to the Central Valley Project Improvement Act? If
yes, please specify priority changes.
Yes, reforming CVPIA is necessary to improve the water situation in the San Joaquin
Valley. Consistent with legislation I proposed in 2005, the Central Valley Project
Reform Act, we must move forward with legislation that recovers lost water and
restores reasonable balance between competing water interests.
4. Will you offer amendments to the San Joaquin River Settlement Act? If so,
please specify priority changes.
Yes, I will propose to repeal and replace the San Joaquin River Settlement with a
more environmentally sensible and fiscally feasible warm water fishery.
5. Will you offer amendments to the Endangered Species Act? If yes, please
specify your priorities and changes.
Yes, I will work with my colleagues to effect necessary changes that will return
balance to the implementation of the law. First and foremost, we must amend the law
to ensure that decisions to recover a species will take into account the human and
economic impacts of the action.
6. The State Water Resources Control Board appears headed towards a decision
that would elevate environmental Delta flows above all other water rights and
contracts. How would you protect federal water rights and contractual obligations?
Congress has the authority to preempt state law and protect personal property
rights. If the State Water Resources Control Board take action to prioritize
environmental water deliveries over existing water right law, I will advocate swift
action in Congress to preempt their action.
7. What is your position on upstream diversions from the Delta? In particular

from Hetch Hetchy, Comanche and Pardee reservoirs?
We must hold San Francisco accountable for their lack of contribution to delta water
quality. In effect, they have their own peripheral canal where they pipe water from
a pristine valley in Yosemite National Park around the delta and into homes of
liberal elites. The San Francisco water users must be required to contribute to the
health of the delta - either through sending water into the delta or providing
financial support for projects that would improve the health of the delta.
8. Will you support legislation to require tertiary treatment of wastewater

discharged into the Delta and its associated waterways?
If drafted appropriately, I will support legislation that will ensure that all
discharges into the Delta meet the necessary water quality standards.
view email in browser | Unsubscribe sworthley@co.tulare.ca.us | Update your

profile | Forward to a friend
You subscribed to this email to keep up to date about news about the environment
and water situation of California's Central Valley. Provided by Families Protecting
The Valley at http://www.familiesprotectingthevalley.com

11409 Road 26 1/2
Add us to your address book
MAIL
Subject: NUNES FEATURED IN TIME MAGAZINE AND ON FOX BUSINESS NETWORK
Date: 20-Oct-2010 11:12
Message Id: 4CBECE95.VIS.PO4.200.20000C7.1.3DF34.1
Dear Friends,
I thought you would be interested to know that I am featured in this week's issue of TIME Magazine. TIME recognized 40
of America's rising stars in politics under 40 (check out the story
here).<http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2023831_2023829_2025225,00.html>
In addition, yesterday I appeared on the FOX BUSINESS NETWORK to discuss the Treasury Department's
announcement that the National Debt has risen by more than $3 trillion dollars since President Obama took office.
The video from this interview, as well as another from last week, can be found on my YouTube
Channel.<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>
Sincerely,
[cid:image001.jpg@01CA2C83.D49876A0]
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
[cid:image002.jpg@01CA2C83.D49876A0]<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>
[cid:image004.jpg@01CA2C83.D49876A0] <http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I thought you would be interested to know that I am featured in this week’s issue of TIME Magazine. TIME
recognized 40 of America’s rising stars in politics under 40 (check out the story here).
In addition, yesterday I appeared on the FOX BUSINESS NETWORK to discuss the Treasury Department’s
announcement that the National Debt has risen by more than $3 trillion dollars since President Obama took
office.
The video from this interview, as well as another from last week, can be found on my YouTube Channel.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
From: nicky@devinnunes.net
Subject: Election Night Poll Watch with Nunes, Conway, Vidak, Valadao and others....
Date: 27-Oct-2010 11:39
Victory Party.pdf [Save] [Open]
Message Id: 4CC80F6E.VIS.PO4.200.2000011.1.10BA8E.1
Central Valley Election Night

POLL WATCH
Hosted by
Central Valley Young Republicans with candidates including:

Congressman Devin Nunes, Congressional Candidate Andy Vidak,
Assemblywoman Connie Conway and Assembly Candidate David Valadao.
Guests please come so candidates can express their

appreciation for "making calls, knocking on doors, and selling the fight."
At St. Johns Hall

8301 81/2 Ave Hanford, CA
On 8 1/2 Ave (N of Grangeville) off of Hwy 43 just North of Hwy 198
Begins at 8 PM (After the polls and phone banks close)

Ends when all Republicans are elected!
. Admission is Free . No-Host Beverages .
Please RSVP to Nicky@DevinNunes.net or 559.739.8903

or to any of the candidates campaign offices.
Thank you,
Nicky
___________________________________________________
Nicky Henderson
Executive Director
FEC# C00370056
PO Box 6545
Visalia, CA 93290
Cell 559.250.8775
Office 559.739.8903
Fax 559.739.8994
EFax 888.412.3824
www.DevinNunes.net


TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Central Valley Election Night

POLL WATCH
Hosted by
Central Valley Young Republicans with candidates including:
Congressman Devin Nunes, Congressional Candidate Andy Vidak,
Assemblywoman Connie Conway and Assembly Candidate David Valadao.
Guests please come so candidates can express their

appreciation for "making calls, knocking on doors, and selling the fight."
At St. Johns Hall

8301 81/2 Ave Hanford, CA
Begins at 8 PM (After the polls and phone banks close)

. Admission is Free . No-Host Beverages .
Please RSVP to Nicky@DevinNunes.net or 559.739.8903

or to any of the candidates campaign offices.
Thank you,
Nicky
___________________________________________________
Nicky Henderson
Executive Director
FEC# C00370056
PO Box 6545
Visalia, CA 93290
Cell 559.250.8775
Office 559.739.8903
Fax 559.739.8994
EFax 888.412.3824
www.DevinNunes.net
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential and privileged information or otherwise be protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original message.

MAIL
Subject: NUNES ON FOX BUSINESS - Recent Terror Threats, and Post-Election Realities
Date: 29-Oct-2010 15:02
Message Id: 4CCAE1FE.VIS.PO4.200.2000078.1.3EFA3.1
Dear Friends,
Earlier today I appeared on the FOX BUSINESS NETWORK's<http://www.foxbusiness.com/index.html> Willis Report

(click here to watch)<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes#p/u/0/wxxOL33X8vU>. Gerri Willis and I discussed
recent terror threats, as well as post-election realities for Republicans.
Sincerely,
image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Earlier today I appeared on the FOX BUSINESS NETWORK’S WILLIS REPORT (CLICK HERE TO
WATCH). Gerri Willis and I discussed recent terror threats, as well as post-election realities for
Republicans.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: High Speed Train Wreck
Date: 11-Nov-2010 17:08
Message Id: 4CDC22FE.VIS.PO4.200.20000B5.1.32723.1
Dear Friends,
The Fresno Bee featured an editorial I wrote in today's paper. Entitled High Speed Rail is a High Speed Train
Wreck<http://www.fresnobee.com/2010/11/10/2154916/devin-nunes-high-speed-rail-is.html> (also posted on my
blog<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/2010/11/high-speed-train-wreck.html>), my submission tackles recent attacks
against Republicans by the Bee and valley Democrats.
I have also updated my YouTube Channel with several recent interviews, including an interview on Geraldo at
Large,<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes?feature=mhum> Nightly
Scoreboard<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes?feature=mhum#p/u/1/8ELs0WKTsts>, and Varney and
Company<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes?feature=mhum#p/u/2/D0JqIGyWNGc>.
Sincerely,
image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
The Fresno Bee featured an editorial I wrote in today’s paper. Entitled High Speed Rail is a High Speed
Train Wreck (also posted on my blog), my submission tackles recent attacks against Republicans by the Bee
and valley Democrats.
I have also updated my YouTube Channel with several recent interviews, including an interview on Geraldo
at Large, Nightly Scoreboard, and Varney and Company.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
From: Tal.Eslick@mail.house.gov
Subject: Tal Eslick- Congressman Devin Nunes
Date: 13-Nov-2010 14:18
Message Id: 4CDE9E4F.VIS.PO4.200.2000009.1.12C3DE.1
Good afternoon,
I have recently accepted a position with Assemblyman-Elect David Valadao. It has been a privilege serving as District
Director for Congressman Devin Nunes. We are working to make the transition as smooth as possible. The next few
weeks should be very exciting.
For any questions regarding Congressman Devin Nunes' office, please contact his District Office at 559-733-7861.
If you need to contact me please do so at my personal email address, talslick7@aol.com<mailto:talslick7@aol.com>. This

email will be deactivated in the coming weeks.
Thank you,
---------------------
Tal Eslick
District Director
tal.eslick@mail.house.gov
Tel: (559) 731-1694
Fax: (559) 323-5528
www.nunes.house.gov
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Good afternoon,
I have recently accepted a position with Assemblyman-Elect David Valadao. It has been a privilege serving
as District Director for Congressman Devin Nunes. We are working to make the transition as smooth as
possible. The next few weeks should be very exciting.
For any questions regarding Congressman Devin Nunes’ office, please contact his District Office at 559-733-
7861.
If you need to contact me please do so at my personal email address, talslick7@aol.com. This email will be
deactivated in the coming weeks.
Thank you,
---------------------
Tal Eslick
District Director
tal.eslick@mail.house.gov
Tel: (559) 731-1694
Fax: (559) 323-5528
www.nunes.house.gov
MAIL
From: Rudy.Mendoza@mail.house.gov
To: Phil Cox
Subject: Congressman Devin Nunes
Date: 01-Dec-2010 16:38
Message Id: 4CF679ED.VIS.PO4.200.200005A.1.28ED8.1
Hello Supervisor,
Just wanted to invite you to Congressman Nunes' open house event on Friday Dec. 10th. This event takes place from
4pm to 6pm.
Look forward to seeing you soon.
Regards,
Rudy Mendoza
Field Representative
Visalia, CA 93291
Ph: (559) 733-3861
Fax: (559) 733-3865
Cell: (559) 972-5795
http://www.nunes.house.gov
[cid:image001.jpg@01CB9176.1397E040]<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>[cid:image002.jpg@01CB9176
.1397E040]<http://www.facebook.com/people/Devin-Nunes/1693459598>
Our Office Mission: To ensure our constituents and all Americans live free and prosperous lives in a healthy and safe
environment by serving, communicating, protecting and representing them in a professional and caring manner
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Hello Supervisor,
Just wanted to invite you to Congressman Nunes’ open house event on Friday Dec. 10th. This event takes
place from 4pm to 6pm.
Look forward to seeing you soon.
Regards,
Rudy Mendoza
Visalia, CA 93291
Ph: (559) 733-3861
Fax: (559) 733-3865
Cell: (559) 972-5795
Our Office Mission: To ensure our constituents and all Americans live free and prosperous lives in a healthy and safe environment by serving, communicating,
protecting and representing them in a professional and caring manner
MAIL
Date: 01-Dec-2010 16:29
Message Id: 4CF677F1.VIS.PO4.200.2000013.1.12E49B.1
Hi Pete,
Just sending you an invitation to Congressman Nunes' open house event on Friday Dec. 10th. This year it will be from
4pm to 6pm. Hope you can make it.
Regards,
Rudy Mendoza
Visalia, CA 93291
Ph: (559) 733-3861
Fax: (559) 733-3865
Cell: (559) 972-5795
[cid:image001.jpg@01CB9174.E9C7CB50]<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>[cid:image002.jpg@01CB917
4.E9C7CB50]<http://www.facebook.com/people/Devin-Nunes/1693459598>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Hi Pete,
Just sending you an invitation to Congressman Nunes’ open house event on Friday Dec. 10th. This year it
will be from 4pm to 6pm. Hope you can make it.
Regards,
Rudy Mendoza
Visalia, CA 93291
Ph: (559) 733-3861
Fax: (559) 733-3865
Cell: (559) 972-5795
MAIL
To: Steven Worthley
Date: 01-Dec-2010 16:26
Message Id: 4CF67750.VIS.PO4.200.20000FC.1.3D4E8.1
Hey Steve,
Just sending you an invitation to Congressman Nunes' open house event on Friday Dec. 10th. This year it will be from
4pm to 6pm. Hope you can make it.
Rudy Mendoza
Visalia, CA 93291
Ph: (559) 733-3861
Fax: (559) 733-3865
Cell: (559) 972-5795
[cid:image001.jpg@01CB9174.86277DC0]<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>[cid:image002.jpg@01CB917
4.86277DC0]<http://www.facebook.com/people/Devin-Nunes/1693459598>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Hey Steve,
Just sending you an invitation to Congressman Nunes’ open house event on Friday Dec. 10th. This year it
will be from 4pm to 6pm. Hope you can make it.
Rudy Mendoza
Visalia, CA 93291
Ph: (559) 733-3861
Fax: (559) 733-3865
Cell: (559) 972-5795
MAIL
Subject: Open House
Date: 02-Dec-2010 14:42
Message Id: 4CF7B04E.VIS.PO4.200.20000A7.1.3A0BF.1
Dear Friends,
It's that time of year again. Please find below an invitation to my open house next Friday.
Sincerely,
image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
Please Join Congressman Devin Nunes and his Staff for a

District Office Open House
Please stop by to learn about constituent services

and discuss issues that Congressman Nunes
is working on in Congress.
Friday, December 10, 2010
4:00 - 6:00 P.M.
Visalia, CA 93291
(Bank of Sierra Building)
Please RSVP to Nicky.Henderson@mail.house.gov or call (559) 733-3861.

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
It’s that time of year again. Please find below an invitation to my open house next Friday.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
Please Join Congressman Devin Nunes and his Staff for a
District Office Open House

Please stop by to learn about constituent services
and discuss issues that Congressman Nunes
is working on in Congress.
Friday, December 10, 2010

4:00 - 6:00 P.M.
Visalia, CA 93291
(Bank of Sierra Building)
Please RSVP to Nicky.Henderson@mail.house.gov or call (559) 733-3861.

MAIL
Subject: More Bailouts?
Date: 09-Dec-2010 15:05
Message Id: 4D00F056.VIS.PO4.200.200007F.1.3BC69.1
Dear Friends,
I wanted to call your attention to a bill I recently introduced titled the Public Employee Pension Transparency
Act<http://nunes.house.gov/_files/PensionTransparencyTrifold.pdf>. Its intended to shine light on the financial status of
our nation's state and local government pensions.
Here is what I propose. The new law would simply require an accurate reporting of public pension liabilities by state and
local governments as a condition of future tax exempt bonding authority. In other words, no more federally subsidized
debt unless state and local pension plans come clean with their true pension debt. My plan also establishes a federal
prohibition on any future bailouts, which will encourage local and state leaders to make more responsible decisions. To-
date, independent reports suggest that public pension debt is more than $3 trillion but most government pension
programs are reporting only a fraction of that amount - keeping all of us in the dark.
You can check out video from my recent appearances on FNC's Your
World<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes#p/u/1/0h5xV2rLElc> and FBN's The Willis
Report<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes#p/u/0/8lhh2TcTiTc> for more information about this issue, as well
as my thoughts on the current tax debate. You can also read reviews of my bill in the Wall Street
Journal<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703350104575653290661576692.html?KEYWORDS=Devin+Nu
nes>, Washington Post<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/07/AR2010120706462.html> and
New York Times<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/10/business/10norris.html>.
As always, please stay tuned to my blog<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/>, YouTube

channel<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes> and homepage<http://www.nunes.house.gov/> for updates on
these issues and others facing our nation.
Sincerely,
image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I wanted to call your attention to a bill I recently introduced titled the Public Employee Pension
Transparency Act. Its intended to shine light on the financial status of our nation’s state and local
government pensions.
Here is what I propose. The new law would simply require an accurate reporting of public pension liabilities
by state and local governments as a condition of future tax exempt bonding authority. In other words, no
more federally subsidized debt unless state and local pension plans come clean with their true pension
debt. My plan also establishes a federal prohibition on any future bailouts, which will encourage local and
state leaders to make more responsible decisions. To-date, independent reports suggest that public pension
debt is more than $3 trillion but most government pension programs are reporting only a fraction of that
amount – keeping all of us in the dark.
You can check out video from my recent appearances on FNC’s Your World and FBN’s The Willis Report
for more information about this issue, as well as my thoughts on the current tax debate. You can also read
reviews of my bill in the Wall Street Journal, Washington Post and New York Times.
As always, please stay tuned to my blog, YouTube channel and homepage for updates on these issues and
others facing our nation.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: Feinstein Embraces "Pearl Harbor Style" Legislating
Date: 15-Dec-2010 15:54
Message Id: 4D08E4BA.VIS.PO4.200.20000EB.1.27034.1
Dear Friends,
I posted a blog today with an urgent update about efforts by Congressional Democrats to sneak dangerous water
legislation into law. I am fighting this sneak attack on our water rights, which is being lead by Senator Dianne Feinstein.
However, Pelosi and Reid retain their supermajorities until January making the next few weeks critical.
Below is an excerpt. Please click here for a full update on this issue.<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/2010/12/feinstein-
embraces-pearl-harbor-style.html>
Sincerely,
image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
NUNES BLOG Wednesday, December 15, 2010<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/2010/12/feinstein-embraces-pearl-

harbor-style.html>
Feinstein Embraces "Pearl Harbor Style" Legislating
Radical environmentalists have realized that they cannot win a public debate arguing that a two-inch bait fish is more
important than families in the San Joaquin Valley and are scrambling for a new message. They are also crafting a sneak
attack to take control of our water.
The Left's need to re-image the Delta water debate is particularly desperate due to a ruling in the U.S. District Court which
rebuked the federal government as having used "sloppy science" to justify the man-made drought. Judge Oliver Wanger
ordered federal agencies back to the drawing board.
However, the Left is already pressing ahead with its backup plan with the help of Senator Dianne Feinstein. That plan is
concealed in massive $1.1 trillion federal spending bill for 2012 and would designate the entire Sacramento-San Joaquin
River Delta as a National Heritage Area. If it becomes law, the Heritage designation would establish a new federal
mandate to protect the natural, scenic, historic, cultural, and recreational resources of the Delta - a thinly veiled effort to
cut off valley water supplies. [more here]<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/2010/12/feinstein-embraces-pearl-harbor-
style.html>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I posted a blog today with an urgent update about efforts by Congressional Democrats to sneak dangerous
water legislation into law. I am fighting this sneak attack on our water rights, which is being lead by Senator
Dianne Feinstein. However, Pelosi and Reid retain their supermajorities until January making the next few
weeks critical.
Below is an excerpt. Please click here for a full update on this issue.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
NUNES BLOG WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 2010
Feinstein Embraces “Pearl Harbor Style” Legislating

Radical environmentalists have realized that they cannot win a public debate arguing that a two-inch bait fish
is more important than families in the San Joaquin Valley and are scrambling for a new message. They are
also crafting a sneak attack to take control of our water.
The Left’s need to re-image the Delta water debate is particularly desperate due to a ruling in the U.S.
District Court which rebuked the federal government as having used “sloppy science” to justify the man-
made drought. Judge Oliver Wanger ordered federal agencies back to the drawing board.
However, the Left is already pressing ahead with its backup plan with the help of Senator Dianne Feinstein.
That plan is concealed in massive $1.1 trillion federal spending bill for 2012 and would designate the entire
Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta as a National Heritage Area. If it becomes law, the Heritage
designation would establish a new federal mandate to protect the natural, scenic, historic, cultural, and
recreational resources of the Delta - a thinly veiled effort to cut off valley water supplies. [more here]
MAIL
Subject: Egypt update: Nunes on FNC
Date: 13-Feb-2011 10:32
Message Id: 4D57B335.VIS.PO4.200.200001D.1.1E78D.1
Dear Friends,
Earlier today, I appeared on the Fox News Channel's America's News HQ to discuss the situation in Egypt. You can
watch the video by visiting my YouTube Channel here<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2V9SU5aUrg>.
Sincerely,
image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Earlier today, I appeared on the Fox News Channel’s America’s News HQ to discuss the situation in Egypt.
You can watch the video by visiting my YouTube Channel here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: TODAY: Rep. Nunes on the Ray Appleton Show (Noon-2pm) -- KMJ580AM
Date: 22-Dec-2011 10:49
Message Id: 4EF30B26.VIS.PO4.200.2000054.1.405C4.1
Dear Friends,
Please tune-in to the Ray Appleton Show today from Noon-2pm. I will be joining Ray to discuss recent developments in
Washington D.C.
Tune the radio to KMJ580AM or online at http://www.kmjnow.com/pages/listenliveplayer580am.
Sincerely,
[cid:image002.jpg@01CCC0AC.7B9BFCB0]
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
[cid:image003.jpg@01CCC0AC.7B9BFCB0]<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>
[cid:image004.jpg@01CCC0AC.7B9BFCB0] <http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/>
[cid:image005.jpg@01CCC0AC.7B9BFCB0]
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Please tune-in to the Ray Appleton Show today from Noon-2pm. I will be joining Ray to discuss recent
developments in Washington D.C.
Tune the radio to KMJ580AM or online at http://www.kmjnow.com/pages/listenliveplayer580am.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: Energy Policy Deja vu on Groundhog Day
Date: 02-Feb-2012 09:07
Message Id: 4F2A5243.VIS.PO4.200.20000D4.1.2DB03.1
Dear Friends,
I posted a new podcast today<http://nunes.house.gov/Podcasts/> featuring a Groundhog Day commentary on our nation's
energy policy.
In addition to listening to the podcast on my website<http://nunes.house.gov/Podcasts>, you now can subscribe free of
charge through iTunes. Just search "Devin Nunes" in the iTunes Store or manually add the podcast URL to iTunes by
clicking "Advanced" on the menu bar and selecting "subscribe to podcast." Simply paste this URL to subscribe:
http://nunes.house.gov/Podcasts/itunes.aspx
In a few weeks, the Nunes APP will also begin featuring my podcasts. If you have a smartphone, check out my Nunes
APP page<http://nunes.house.gov/ConstituentServices/DevinNunesApp.htm> for information on how to download the free
Nunes APP.
Sincerely,
Description: image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
Description: cid:image002.jpg@01CA0C65.39471370<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes> Description:

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I posted a new podcast today featuring a Groundhog Day commentary on our nation’s energy policy.
In addition to listening to the podcast on my website, you now can subscribe free of charge through iTunes.
Just search “Devin Nunes” in the iTunes Store or manually add the podcast URL to iTunes by clicking “
Advanced” on the menu bar and selecting “subscribe to podcast.” Simply paste this URL to subscribe:
http://nunes.house.gov/Podcasts/itunes.aspx
In a few weeks, the Nunes APP will also begin featuring my podcasts. If you have a smartphone, check out
my Nunes APP page for information on how to download the free Nunes APP.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: Water Bill Passes Committee - Bipartisan vote supports water security for farms and rural communities
Date: 16-Feb-2012 16:54
Message Id: 4F3D34B1.VIS.PO4.200.20000E4.1.6154E.1
Dear Friends,
Tonight, with the passage of H.R. 1837 by the House Resources Committee, we have made significant progress in our
effort to restore the flow of water to farms and rural communities (full
video<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpmKt6iYLng&feature=channel_video_title>). See my press release below:
Nunes Water Bill Passes Committee - Heads to Full House
Bipartisan vote supports water security for farms and rural communities
Washington DC- Today, the House Natural Resources Committee<http://naturalresources.house.gov/> approved on a

bipartisan basis H.R. 1837, the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Water Reliability
Act<http://www.nunes.house.gov/water>. The bill will restore the flow of water to farms and rural communities, while
protecting the property rights of all Californians. It will also make unnecessary the construction of a $12 billion peripheral
canal to bypass the Bay-Delta.
"I commend the hard work of Chairman Doc Hastings, Subcommittee Chairman Tom McClintock, and Rep. Jeff Denham.
Their efforts are greatly appreciated by the people who have suffered under government-imposed water shortages," said
Rep. Devin Nunes.
"Today's action sends a strong message to the people of California that House Republicans are fighting to deliver water,
jobs, and security to their communities. Our work today comes after years of negligence by Democratic super-majorities
and is the first step in keeping our promise to Sacramento and San Joaquin Valley residents," Nunes continued.
During the prolonged committee markup, bill opponents complained about the complexity of the issue and the lack of time
they had to consider it. However, the most vocal critics of the bill were the same lawmakers who refused to offer their
own plan or allow debate of the Nunes plan during Democratic super-majorities.
"This bill is a remarkable North-South compromise that will protect all water users. Those who continue to obstruct the bill
are being exposed for their extreme views. This is particularly true of California's Senators who have yet to offer any
alternatives to H.R. 1837. Feinstein and her allies can kill H.R. 1837, they can write their own bill and pass it or they can
continue to do nothing. Whatever they choose, they will have to defend their position to the people of California. There will
be no more hiding," said Nunes.
The Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Water Reliability Act has broad support from throughout the state. Cities, counties,
and water districts from Kern County to the Oregon border have endorsed the bill.
For more information, please visit www.nunes.house.gov/water<http://www.nunes.house.gov/water>.
Thanks for your interest in this important issue.
Sincerely,
Description: image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
Description: cid:image002.jpg@01CA0C65.39471370<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes> Description:
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Tonight, with the passage of H.R. 1837 by the House Resources Committee, we have made significant
progress in our effort to restore the flow of water to farms and rural communities (full video). See my press
release below:
Nunes Water Bill Passes Committee – Heads to Full House
Bipartisan vote supports water security for farms and rural communities
Washington DC- Today, the House Natural Resources Committee approved on a bipartisan basis H.
R. 1837, the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Water Reliability Act. The bill will restore the flow of
water to farms and rural communities, while protecting the property rights of all Californians. It will
also make unnecessary the construction of a $12 billion peripheral canal to bypass the Bay-Delta.
“I commend the hard work of Chairman Doc Hastings, Subcommittee Chairman Tom McClintock,
and Rep. Jeff Denham. Their efforts are greatly appreciated by the people who have suffered under
government-imposed water shortages,” said Rep. Devin Nunes.
“Today’s action sends a strong message to the people of California that House Republicans are
fighting to deliver water, jobs, and security to their communities. Our work today comes after years
of negligence by Democratic super-majorities and is the first step in keeping our promise to
Sacramento and San Joaquin Valley residents,” Nunes continued.
During the prolonged committee markup, bill opponents complained about the complexity of the
issue and the lack of time they had to consider it. However, the most vocal critics of the bill were the
same lawmakers who refused to offer their own plan or allow debate of the Nunes plan during
Democratic super-majorities.
“This bill is a remarkable North-South compromise that will protect all water users. Those who
continue to obstruct the bill are being exposed for their extreme views. This is particularly true of
California’s Senators who have yet to offer any alternatives to H.R. 1837. Feinstein and her allies
can kill H.R. 1837, they can write their own bill and pass it or they can continue to do nothing.
Whatever they choose, they will have to defend their position to the people of California. There will
be no more hiding,” said Nunes.
The Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Water Reliability Act has broad support from throughout the
state. Cities, counties, and water districts from Kern County to the Oregon border have endorsed the
bill.
For more information, please visit www.nunes.house.gov/water.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
To: Steven Worthley
Subject: What's Their Solution?
Date: 17-Feb-2012 13:26
Message Id: 4F3E559F.VIS.PO4.200.2000081.1.25159.1
[1]Families Protecting The Valley Newsletter

VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2
Links:
1. http://www.familiesprotectingthevalley.com
FEBRUARY 17 2012
:: IN THIS ISSUE
» [2]WaterWar
» [3]HetchHetchy
[4]Donate to Families Protected the Valley
[5]Visit Our Web Site
Links:
2. http://www.calwatchdog.com/2012/02/16/farmers-want-out-of-delta-bills
3. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/17/opinion/hetch-hetchys-past-and-future.html?_r=2
4. http://www.familiesprotectingthevalley.com/Donate-i-26-26.html
5. http://www.protectthevalley.org

Links:
6. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Families-Protecting-the-Valley/139852932740874
Board of Directors
Denis Prosperi
Chester Andrew
Bob Smittcamp
Russ Waymire
Joe Marchini
Mark Watte
Kole Upton
Piedad Ayala
Tom Barcellos
Jim Walls
What's Their Solution?
Congressman Devin Nunes is moving a water bill through the House to
solve California's long-standing water problems. After two years of
heavy rainfall we're right back where we started before the rains
came. Instead of solving problems during the wet years we continued to
kick the can down the road and now we're in for a rough water year. At
least Congressman Nunes is trying to do something. What does the
opposition to Nunes have to say?
Congressman John Garamendi: "It simply imposes the federal will on the
state. The bill adds to the conflict without solving the underlying
problems, and that's unfortunate." Does Garamendi have a plan?
California Natural Resources Secretary John Laird: The bill "continues
to undermine California's ability to address its serious water
challenges and will erase years of progress toward a collaborative
solution." Years of progress? Show me what that is.
Read more here:
http://www.fresnobee.com/2012/02/16/2724722/house-committee-hearing-on-
california.html#storylink=cpy
Feinstein and Boxer: Attempts to provide more water to the valley
"without accounting for where the water will come from or what the
impacts will be." How are they planning to provide water?
Year after year, farmers have their water allocations cut, not even
getting 100% in a year like last year. The politicians like to talk
about fixing things, but they deny farmers their water while they
talk. How about farmers get their water while the talk goes on? Then
you can talk forever.
Read more here:
Read more here:

Read more here:

House committee approves California water bill

By Michael Doyle / Bee Washington Bureau
Modified Fri, Feb 17, 2012
WASHINGTON WASHINGTON -- San Joaquin Valley farmers would secure more

water and an ambitious river restoration plan would be curtailed under
a far-reaching California bill approved by a key House panel Thursday
night.
It's still a long way to becoming the law -- the Senate must also sign
off on the water plan, and both of California's senators oppose it. So
does the administration of Gov. Jerry Brown.But following months of
negotiations designed to ease Sacramento Valley concerns, bill
supporters insist they're on the right course.
"Up and down the Valley, throughout the state, water districts have
been able to come together," said Rep. Jeff Denham, R-Turlock. "This
bill restores water rights, so we can solve our economic problems,
together."
After brushing off Democratic amendments, the GOP-controlled House

Natural Resources Committee approved the water bill by a 27-17 margin.
Only two Democrats, Jim Costa of Fresno and Dan Boren of Oklahoma,
voted for it.
Denham, House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy, R-Bakersfield, and chief

author Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Visalia, say their revised 51-page package
is a way to improve farmers' water supply reliability.
The legislation returns federal irrigation contracts to 40 years,

rather than the 25-year limit imposed in 1992. It eases water
transfers, pre-empts strict state law and restores environmental
standards set in 1994.
"It simply imposes the federal will on the state," said bill opponent
Rep. John Garamendi, D-Walnut Grove. "The bill adds to the conflict
without solving the underlying problems, and that's unfortunate."
In a particularly controversial move, the bill ends a San Joaquin River

restoration program and replaces it with a less ambitious plan. The
current program designed to return both water and salmon below Friant
Dam was authorized by Congress in 2009, putting into effect a lawsuit
settlement reached between farmers and environmentalists.
"It's the biggest boondoggle in the history of California water," Nunes

said of the current San Joaquin River program, calling his effort to
replace it "the linchpin of this bill."
But curtailing the San Joaquin river restoration effort is also

politically problematic. Friant-area farmers on the San Joaquin
Valley's east side have supported the current program as preferable to
letting a judge make water decisions.
Senate rules and traditions also give Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein,
the Senate's author of the original San Joaquin River restoration plan,
considerable clout in blocking home-state bills. In a joint letter
delivered Thursday, Feinstein and Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer
reiterated their "strong opposition" to the House bill they called
"troubling."
"Unless we're willing to work with [Feinstein], the measure will never
become law," said Costa, who voted for the bill even as he complained
about a "disappointing" lack of bipartisan collaboration.
Adding to the political impediments, the Brown administration's top

resources officer warned that the overall House bill "wreaks havoc"
with ongoing efforts to balance water use.
The bill "continues to undermine California's ability to address its

serious water challenges and will erase years of progress toward a
collaborative solution," California Natural Resources Secretary John
Laird said in a letter sent Wednesday.
The most important differences negotiated since the bill was introduced
last year deal with Sacramento Valley concerns about losing water to
farmers south of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. The revised bill
adds several pages clarifying that the Sacramento Valley customers will
get their water.
"The result is an unprecedented consensus ... that resolves

long-standing disputes between Northern and Central California," said
Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Elk Grove, the chair of the House water and
power subcommittee.
Among House committee members, though, the long markup session Thursday
was characterized by periodic finger pointing, blame setting and
recollections of past fights -- some going back many years.
The chair of the resources committee, Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash.,

promised that he will do everything he can to get the bill through the
House, stressing that the ball will then be in the Senate's court. And
Nunes said the Republican-led House will keep passing California water
legislation until the Senate relents.
* Also Thursday, the House committee passed a Republican-led plan
that explicitly ties rural schools-and-roads funding to more active
logging, grazing and mining on individual national forests. The
vote was 26-17.
From the website of Congressman John Garamendi:
“Following a markup of HR 1837, the so-called San Joaquin Water

Reliability Act, in the House Natural Resources Committee,
Congressman John Garamendi, a former Deputy Secretary of the
Interior issued the following statement:
“HR 1837 turns upside down 150 years of California water law and the
allocation of water. The bill removes all environmental protections
for the Delta and Central Valley rivers while allowing destructive
exports of water from the Delta to San Joaquin Valley water
districts.
“However, one section of the bill, Title 4, has merit in that it

affirms existing water rights and area of origin rights in Northern
California. Unfortunately, this section was combined with too much
bad policy for the bill to receive my support. … “
[7]Continue reading from Congressman John Garamendi by clicking here.

Links:
7. http://garamendi.house.gov/2012/02/garamendi-issues-statement-on-water-bill.shtml
Senators Feinstein & Boxer have written a letter to Congressman Doc

Hastings (Chair) and Congressman Markey (Ranking Member) of the House
Natural Resources Committee:
Dear Chairman Hastings and Ranking Member Markey:
We write to express our strong opposition to H.R. 1837, the San

Joaquin Valley Water Reliability Act and the proposed substitute
amendment scheduled to be marked up by the committee on February 16.
When H.R. 1837 was introduced last spring, we and numerous others
expressed very serious concerns about the bill to the Subcommittee
on Water and Power. Unfortunately, the proposed substitute amendment
only compounds the problems presented by the original version of the
bill by attempting to provide guaranteed water deliveries to an even
larger group of water users without accou8nting for where the water
will come from or what the impacts will be. Indeed, the sweeping
nature of this new revised bill (that was just made available in the
last 24 hours), and its potential for harm to our state, cannot be
overstated. … “
Continue reading this letter here:

[8]DF-BB_Ltr_to_House_Natural_Resources_Committee_-Rivised_Nunes_Bill_0
21512
Links:
8. http://aquafornia.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/DF-
BB_Ltr_to_House_Natural_Resources_Committee_-Rivised_Nunes_Bill_021512.pdf
From the website of Congressman Devin Nunes:
“Today, the House Natural Resources Committee approved on a

bipartisan basis H.R. 1837, the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Water
Reliability Act. The bill will restore the flow of water to farms
and rural communities, while protecting the property rights of all
Californians. It will also make unnecessary the construction of a
$12 billion peripheral canal to bypass the Bay-Delta.
“I commend the hard work of Chairman Doc Hastings, Subcommittee

Chairman Tom McClintock, and Rep. Jeff Denham. Their efforts are
greatly appreciated by the people who have suffered under
“Today’s action sends a strong message to the people of California

that House Republicans are fighting to deliver water, jobs, and
security to their communities. Our work today comes after years of
negligence by Democratic super-majorities and is the first step in
keeping our promise to Sacramento and San Joaquin Valley residents,”
Nunes continued. … “
[9]Continue reading from the website of Congressman Devin Nunes by

clicking here.
Links:
9. http://nunes.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=280926
From the website of Congressman Jeff Denham:
“Congressman Jeff Denham issued the following statement today in

regards to the passage of H.R. 1837, the Sacramento-San Joaquin
Valley Reliability Act. The water crisis in California continues to
be a contentious debate, but Congressman Denham is working to find
areas of agreement in order to bring a reliable, sustainable water
supply to the farmers and people of the Central Valley.
“The Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Reliability Act will eliminate

duplicative environmental requirements, provide certainty for family
farms, save taxpayers $300 million, construct additional water
storage, and begin to revitalize local economies and job creation in
the Central Valley,” said Congressman Jeff Denham. “This legislation
will restore confidence in the agriculture sector, allowing farmers
to continue to hire workers and grow a safe, sustainable food supply
for the country and the world.” … “
[10]Continue reading from Congressman Denham’s website by clicking

here.
Links:
10. http://denham.house.gov/press-release/congressman-denham-streamlining-regulations-bring-reliable-water-
supply-valley-and
If you enjoy our newsletter please send it to friends. If you're a

member of an organization please feel free to send it to everyone on
your list. If someone sent this to you and you'd like your own free
subscription, sign up [11]here. If you'd like to respond just click
'reply' or send to [12]john@familiesprotectingthevalley.com
Links:
manage.com/track/click?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=404a4a8dbb&e=1b6ea2fb28
manage.com/track/click?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=c9b26a1e7b&e=1b6ea2fb28
[13]view email in browser | [14]Unsubscribe sworthley@co.tulare.ca.us | [15]Update your

profile | [16]Forward to a friend
Links:
13. http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=8298a0465f&e=7f1c52f176
manage.com/unsubscribe?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=2b06a413ff&e=7f1c52f176&c=8298a0465f
16. http://us1.forward-to-friend2.com/forward?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=8298a0465f&e=7f1c52f176

11409 Road 26 1/2
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2 FEBRUARY 17 2012
:: IN THIS ISSUE
» WaterWar
» HetchHetchy What's Their Solution?
Congressman Devin Nunes is moving a water bill through the House to solve California's long-standing water
problems. After two years of heavy rainfall we're right back where we started before the rains came. Instead of
solving problems during the wet years we continued to kick the can down the road and now we're in for a rough water
year. At least Congressman Nunes is trying to do something. What does the opposition to Nunes have to say?
Congressman John Garamendi: "It simply imposes the federal will on the state. The bill adds to the conflict without
solving the underlying problems, and that's unfortunate." Does Garamendi have a plan?
California Natural Resources Secretary John Laird: The bill "continues to undermine California's ability to address its
serious water challenges and will erase years of progress toward a collaborative solution." Years of progress? Show
me what that is.
Feinstein and Boxer: Attempts to provide more water to the valley "without accounting for where the water will
Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/2012/02/16/2724722/house-committee-hearing-on-cali
come from or what the impacts will be." How are they planning to provide water?
Year after year, farmers have their water allocations cut, not even getting 100% in a year like last year. The
politicians like to talk about fixing things, but they deny farmers their water while they talk. How about farmers get
their water while the talk goes on? Then you can talk forever.
Board of Directors
Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/2012/02/16/2724722/house-committee-hearing-on-cali
Denis Prosperi
Chester Andrew Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/2012/02/16/2724722/house-committee-hearing-on-cali
Bob Smittcamp
Russ Waymire
John "Dusty" Giacone House committee
Read more here:approves California water bill
http://www.fresnobee.com/2012/02/16/2724722/hous
Joe Marchini
Mark Watte By Michael Doyle / Bee Washington Bureau
Kole Upton
Piedad Ayala
Tom Barcellos
Jim Walls
WASHINGTON WASHINGTON -- San Joaquin Valley farmers would secure more water and an ambitious river
restoration plan would be curtailed under a far-reaching California bill approved by a key House panel Thursday
night.
It's still a long way to becoming the law -- the Senate must also sign off on the water plan, and both of California's
senators oppose it. So does the administration of Gov. Jerry Brown.But following months of negotiations designed to
ease Sacramento Valley concerns, bill supporters insist they're on the right course.
"Up and down the Valley, throughout the state, water districts have been able to come together," said Rep. Jeff
Denham, R-Turlock. "This bill restores water rights, so we can solve our economic problems, together."
After brushing off Democratic amendments, the GOP-controlled House Natural Resources Committee approved the
water bill by a 27-17 margin. Only two Democrats, Jim Costa of Fresno and Dan Boren of Oklahoma, voted for it.
Denham, House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy, R-Bakersfield, and chief author Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Visalia, say
their revised 51-page package is a way to improve farmers' water supply reliability.
The legislation returns federal irrigation contracts to 40 years, rather than the 25-year limit imposed in 1992. It eases
water transfers, pre-empts strict state law and restores environmental standards set in 1994.
"It simply imposes the federal will on the state," said bill opponent Rep. John Garamendi, D-Walnut Grove. "The bill
adds to the conflict without solving the underlying problems, and that's unfortunate."
In a particularly controversial move, the bill ends a San Joaquin River restoration program and replaces it with a less
ambitious plan. The current program designed to return both water and salmon below Friant Dam was authorized by
Congress in 2009, putting into effect a lawsuit settlement reached between farmers and environmentalists.
"It's the biggest boondoggle in the history of California water," Nunes said of the current San Joaquin River program,
calling his effort to replace it "the linchpin of this bill."
But curtailing the San Joaquin river restoration effort is also politically problematic. Friant-area farmers on the San
Joaquin Valley's east side have supported the current program as preferable to letting a judge make water decisions.
Senate rules and traditions also give Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the Senate's author of the original San
Joaquin River restoration plan, considerable clout in blocking home-state bills. In a joint letter delivered Thursday,
Feinstein and Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer reiterated their "strong opposition" to the House bill they called
"troubling."
"Unless we're willing to work with [Feinstein], the measure will never become law," said Costa, who voted for the
bill even as he complained about a "disappointing" lack of bipartisan collaboration.
Adding to the political impediments, the Brown administration's top resources officer warned that the overall House
bill "wreaks havoc" with ongoing efforts to balance water use.
The bill "continues to undermine California's ability to address its serious water challenges and will erase years of
progress toward a collaborative solution," California Natural Resources Secretary John Laird said in a letter sent
Wednesday.
The most important differences negotiated since the bill was introduced last year deal with Sacramento Valley
concerns about losing water to farmers south of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. The revised bill adds several
pages clarifying that the Sacramento Valley customers will get their water.
"The result is an unprecedented consensus ... that resolves long-standing disputes between Northern and Central
California," said Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Elk Grove, the chair of the House water and power subcommittee.
Among House committee members, though, the long markup session Thursday was characterized by periodic finger
pointing, blame setting and recollections of past fights -- some going back many years.
The chair of the resources committee, Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., promised that he will do everything he can to get
the bill through the House, stressing that the ball will then be in the Senate's court. And Nunes said the Republican-
led House will keep passing California water legislation until the Senate relents.
Also Thursday, the House committee passed a Republican-led plan that explicitly ties rural schools-and-
roads funding to more active logging, grazing and mining on individual national forests. The vote was 26-17.
From the website of Congressman John Garamendi:
“Following a markup of HR 1837, the so-called San Joaquin Water Reliability Act, in the House
Natural Resources Committee, Congressman John Garamendi, a former Deputy Secretary of the
Interior issued the following statement:
“HR 1837 turns upside down 150 years of California water law and the
allocation of water. The bill removes all environmental protections for the Delta and Central
Valley rivers while allowing destructive exports of water from the Delta to San Joaquin Valley
water districts.
“However, one section of the bill, Title 4, has merit in that it affirms existing water rights and area
of origin rights in Northern California. Unfortunately, this section was combined with too much
bad policy for the bill to receive my support. … “
Continue reading from Congressman John Garamendi by clicking here.
Senators Feinstein & Boxer have written a letter to Congressman Doc Hastings (Chair) and Congressman Markey
(Ranking Member) of the House Natural Resources Committee:
Dear Chairman Hastings and Ranking Member Markey:
We write to express our strong opposition to H.R. 1837, the San Joaquin Valley Water Reliability
Act and the proposed substitute amendment scheduled to be marked up by the committee on
February 16.
When H.R. 1837 was introduced last spring, we and numerous others expressed very serious
concerns about the bill to the Subcommittee on Water and Power. Unfortunately, the proposed
substitute amendment only compounds the problems presented by the original version of the bill
by attempting to provide guaranteed water deliveries to an even larger group of water users
without accou8nting for where the water will come from or what the impacts will be. Indeed, the
sweeping nature of this new revised bill (that was just made available in the last 24 hours), and its
potential for harm to our state, cannot be overstated. … “
Continue reading this letter here: DF-BB_Ltr_to_House_Natural_Resources_Committee_-

Rivised_Nunes_Bill_021512
From the website of Congressman Devin Nunes:
“Today, the House Natural Resources Committee approved on a bipartisan basis H.R. 1837, the
Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Water Reliability Act. The bill will restore the flow of water to
farms and rural communities, while protecting the property rights of all Californians. It will also
make unnecessary the construction of a $12 billion peripheral canal to bypass the Bay-Delta.
“I commend the hard work of Chairman Doc Hastings, Subcommittee Chairman Tom McClintock,
and Rep. Jeff Denham. Their efforts are greatly appreciated by the people who have suffered under
“Today’s action sends a strong message to the people of California that House Republicans are
fighting to deliver water, jobs, and security to their communities. Our work today comes after
years of negligence by Democratic super-majorities and is the first step in keeping our promise to
Sacramento and San Joaquin Valley residents,” Nunes continued. … “
Continue reading from the website of Congressman Devin Nunes by clicking here.
From the website of Congressman Jeff Denham:
“Congressman Jeff Denham issued the following statement today in regards to the passage of H.R.
1837, the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Reliability Act. The water crisis in California continues
to be a contentious debate, but Congressman Denham is working to find areas of agreement in
order to bring a reliable, sustainable water supply to the farmers and people of the Central Valley.
“The Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Reliability Act will eliminate duplicative environmental
requirements, provide certainty for family farms, save taxpayers $300 million, construct additional
water storage, and begin to revitalize local economies and job creation in the Central Valley,” said
Congressman Jeff Denham. “This legislation will restore confidence in the agriculture sector,
allowing farmers to continue to hire workers and grow a safe, sustainable food supply for the
country and the world.” … “
Continue reading from Congressman Denham’s website by clicking here.

If you enjoy our newsletter please send it to friends. If you're a member of an organization please feel free to send
it to everyone on your list. If someone sent this to you and you'd like your own free subscription, sign up here. If
you'd like to respond just click 'reply' or send to john@familiesprotectingthevalley.com


11409 Road 26 1/2
MAIL
To: Steven Worthley
Subject: McClintock: Just the Facts!
Date: 24-Feb-2012 13:15
Message Id: 4F478D84.VIS.PO4.200.2000032.1.3F039.1

VOLUME 4 ISSUE 4
Links:
FEBRUARY 24 2012
:: IN THIS ISSUE
» [2]Allocation
» [3]HetchHetchy
Links:
2. http://www.fresnobee.com/2012/02/22/2732802/feds-offer-dismal-central-valley.html
3. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/02/22/BA461NB000.DTL&type=science

Links:
Board of Directors
Denis Prosperi
Chester Andrew
Bob Smittcamp
Russ Waymire
Joe Marchini
Mark Watte
Kole Upton
Piedad Ayala
Tom Barcellos
Jim Walls
McClintock: Just the Facts!
The first article below is a response by Congressman Tom McClintock to
an article in the San Francisco Chronicle about the Water Reliability
Act, the Congressional bill being moved along by Devin Nunes and Jeff
Denham. McClintock needs no further introduction and we'll let the
article speak for itself. The original article he's talking about is
also below.
Response San Francisco Chronicle
I have submitted a shorter letter responding to the Chronicle’s

front-page article by Carolyn Lochhead (“Central Valley reps bill would
upend water rights,” February 17, 2012), but believe the inaccuracies
and omissions in it are so stark that it deserves a more detailed
reply.
“Representatives from the Central Valley pushed legislation through a

House committee Thursday that would upend the state's system of water
rights, deploying the federal government to extract water from Northern
California farms, fisheries and cities to send to farmers in the
valley.”
Title IV of the measure specifically reaffirms and guarantees the

state’s system of water rights and brings the full force of federal law
to protect those rights.
Indeed, the Northern California Water Association, representing the

very water users Ms. Lochhead contends would have their rights
“upended” and their water “extracted” strongly supports the bill. It
writes:
“The bill, if enacted, now contains provisions that would not only
protect the interests of senior water rights holders in the Sacramento
Valley, but would also provide significant, material water policy
improvements to current federal law. The bill, if enacted, would
provide an unprecedented federal statutory express recognition of, and
commitment to, California’s state water rights priority system and area
of origin protections. This is important for the region to provide
sustainable water supplies for productive farmlands, wildlife refuges,
and managed wetlands, cities and rural communities, recreation, and
meandering rivers that support important fisheries.”
Additionally, Title I, Section 105 of the bill permits Delta and Bay
Area districts to re-use environmental water once it has served its
purpose, increasing the amount of water available to Northern
California communities.
Finally, the vote was bi-partisan, with Democrats Jim Costa

(D-California) and Dan Boren (D-Oklahoma) joining Republicans in
adopting the bill 27 to 17.
“The legislation would halt restoration of the San Joaquin River,

leaving as much as 40 miles of the river dry, restore irrigation
contracts and override fish and wildlife protections in the
Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.”
This charge, which was also made in the Chronicle’s editorial of

February 16, 2012, is categorically false. In fact, Title II merely
replaces the coldwater fishery established under the San Joaquin River
Settlement Act of 2009 with a warm water fishery more conducive to the
Central Valley habitat, guaranteeing year round flows. During my
opening statement, I said:
“(The bill) replaces the San Joaquin River Settlement Act that was
imposed in 2009 with a workable and vastly less expensive alternative.
“Let me put the current San Joaquin River Settlement Act in

perspective. It will spend more than one billion dollars to achieve the
stated goal of establishing a population of 500 salmon below the Friant
dam. That comes to two million dollars per fish. And that’s without
accounting for the costs that will be incurred by Central Valley
farmers as water that is already in critically short supply is diverted
to this project that are estimated to increase the actual cost
ten-fold.”
During committee discussion, I went on to say, “The San Joaquin River

is on the hot valley floor – the only time it has been a cold-water
fishery was during very wet years and then only sporadically.”
“McClintock negotiated an agreement from fellow Republicans to preserve

local water rights to protect his Sacramento district from the original
bill.”
In fact, I said in my opening statement that my office had conducted “a

laborious eight-month process of consulting more than 60 northern
California water agencies – in both Democratic and Republican
congressional districts -- and the result is an unprecedented consensus
reflected in the amendment.” During the committee debate, I read a list
of 11 water districts in Democratic Congressman Garamendi’s district
alone that we worked with on amendments to protect their water rights.
Whatever our personal biases and opinions, we should at least be able

to agree that readers are entitled to the truth, particularly in a
story appearing on the front page of a major metropolitan newspaper
over a matter of significant public importance. All of the facts and
statements cited above were made during the public meeting and should
have been known to all those who attended it. I believe that this
article clearly crossed the line into demonstrable falsehood and I
challenge the management of the Chronicle to set the record straight.
Sincerely,
Tom McClintock
Chairman, Sub-Committee on Water and Power, House Natural Resources
Committee
Central Valley reps bill would upend water rights
[7]Carolyn Lochhead
Links:
7. mailto:clochhead@sfchronicle.com
Washington -- Representatives from the Central Valley pushed

legislation through a House committee Thursday that would upend the
state's system of water rights, deploying the federal government to
extract water from Northern California farms, fisheries and cities to
send to farmers in the valley.
The action by the House Natural Resources Committee came the same day
that the House voted to require the federal government to usurp
California's governance of its coastline by requiring offshore leasing
for oil and gas drilling.
Neither bill is expected to become law, given strong opposition from

California's Democratic senators, Dianne Feinstein and [8]Barbara
Boxer.
Links:
8. http://www.sfgate.com/barbara-boxer
But the water bill, HR1837, is a major salvo by Central Valley

lawmakers, most of them Republicans but including Rep. Jim Costa,
D-Hanford (Kings County), in a pitched, emotional battle over who gets
water in a state whose antiquated water system is straining under the
demands of a burgeoning population, a declining ecosystem and the
nation's most productive farm sector.
Among other things, the legislation would halt restoration of the San
Joaquin River, leaving as much as 40 miles of the river dry, restore
irrigation contracts and override fish and wildlife protections in the
Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.
"Plain and simple, it's a water raid on the delta," said Rep. John
Garamendi, D-Walnut Grove (Sacramento County), who waged trench warfare
in the committee by offering more than 20 amendments. All were
defeated, but Garamendi said he was "laying down a track of information
that will be useful later."
Water held in trust
Garamendi said the valley lawmakers are attempting to "obliterate all

the environmental laws of the state and federal governments and
simultaneously override the California Constitution," whose public
trust doctrine holds that all the waters of California are held in
trust by the government for the people of California.
Feinstein and Boxer wrote a letter to the committee chairman stating

their strong opposition, saying the bill would waive endangered species
protections and attempt to provide more water to the valley "without
accounting for where the water will come from or what the impacts will
be."
Sponsored by Republican Reps. Devin Nunes of Tulare County, Kevin

McCarthy of Bakersfield and Jeff Denham of Merced, with support from
Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Elk Grove (Sacramento County) and Democrat
Costa, the legislation cleared the House committee on a 27-17 vote.
Republicans said the legislation would "end California's man-made

droughts, bring jobs and water supply certainty to the Sacramento and
San Joaquin valleys and decrease reliance on foreign food sources."
Costa said that with the world population headed to 9 billion, "the
production of food and fiber is a security issue not only for us but
for the world."
Stands no chance
But he conceded that the bill will never be enacted, saying Feinstein's
participation was not sought, even though he said she has been "a
champion trying to fight for water in our valley," often to the
consternation of Bay Area Democrats. Costa said the bill "will never
bring a single drop of water to our valley."
Cynthia Koehler, legislative director for California water for the

Environmental Defense Fund, said the bill was the boldest attempt to
pre-empt state water law she has ever seen.
"There is a fairly significant question about whether it is

constitutional," she said. "Congress could say to every state, 'You
cannot touch any water rights to preserve fish and wildlife for any
purpose at all.' "
House members from the valley blamed their area's high unemployment on
water shortages. Denham challenged Democrats to "come to Mendota and
see the 40 percent unemployment rate."
But the Pacific Institute in Oakland concluded in a recent study on the

effect of the recent state drought that chronic unemployment in the
Central Valley was mainly the result of the housing downturn.
A matter of rights
McClintock negotiated an agreement from fellow Republicans to preserve

local water rights to protect his Sacramento district from the original
bill, which put those rights in question. He argued that the
legislation does not trounce states' rights.
Instead, he said it upholds individual rights guaranteed by the 14th

Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which makes it a duty of Congress
"to protect the property rights, including water rights, of every
citizen against encroachment" by the state, including water he claims
was expropriated to protect fisheries and "cavalierly dumped into the
Pacific Ocean."
Garamendi said the bill fails to develop any new water sources and
simply moves water around, violating "160 years of history, regulations
and water rights. The measure "adds to the conflict without resolving
the underlying problem."
Costa defended amendments to grant 900 more acre feet of delta water to
Kettleman City, a tiny, isolated farming town in Kings County, and
raise Shasta Dam by 15 feet. Republicans warned that the Shasta
amendment was an earmark and would "poison" the overall bill, so Costa
withdrew it. The Kettleman City earmark stayed.
Carolyn Lochhead is the San Francisco Chronicle's Washington

correspondent. [9]clochhead@sfchronicle.com
Links:
9. mailto:clochhead@sfchronicle.com
Other:
[10]Commentary: The Government-Imposed California Dust Bowl

Links:
10. http://www.familiesprotectingthevalley.com/topstory-m-99-99.html?ax=v&n=99&id=99&nid=4033
[11]Nunes Bill Reignites Water War

Links:
[12]Editorial: Nunes Scores With Water Bill

Links:
[13]Commentary: What's Devin Nunes Up To?

Links:
[14]Farmers Want Out of Delta Bills

Links:
[15]Nunes Bill Aims to Restore Central Valley Water Supplies

Links:
[16]McClintock: Water for Our Future and Job Creation
Links:

Links:
manage.com/track/click?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=7b8c1b0b45&e=1b6ea2fb28
manage.com/track/click?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=fdb926e47d&e=1b6ea2fb28

Links:
19. http://us1.campaign-archive2.com/?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=5962aa01e4&e=7f1c52f176
manage1.com/unsubscribe?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=2b06a413ff&e=7f1c52f176&c=5962aa01e4
manage.com/profile?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=2b06a413ff&e=7f1c52f176
22. http://us1.forward-to-friend.com/forward?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=5962aa01e4&e=7f1c52f176

11409 Road 26 1/2
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
:: IN THIS ISSUE
» Allocation
» HetchHetchy
McClintock: Just the Facts!
The first article below is a response by Congressman Tom McClintock to an article in the San Francisco Chronicle
about the Water Reliability Act, the Congressional bill being moved along by Devin Nunes and Jeff
Denham. McClintock needs no further introduction and we'll let the article speak for itself. The original article he's
talking about is also below.
Response San Francisco Chronicle
I have submitted a shorter letter responding to the Chronicle’s front-page article by Carolyn Lochhead (“Central
Valley reps bill would upend water rights,” February 17, 2012), but believe the inaccuracies and omissions in it are so
stark that it deserves a more detailed reply.
Board of Directors
“Representatives from the Central Valley pushed legislation through a House committee Thursday that would upend
Denis Prosperi the state's system of water rights, deploying the federal government to extract water from Northern California farms,
fisheries and cities to send to farmers in the valley.”
Chester Andrew
Bob Smittcamp
Russ Waymire Title IV of the measure specifically reaffirms and guarantees the state’s system of water rights and brings the full
John "Dusty" Giacone force of federal law to protect those rights.
Joe Marchini
Mark Watte Indeed, the Northern California Water Association, representing the very water users Ms. Lochhead contends would
Kole Upton have their rights “upended” and their water “extracted” strongly supports the bill. It writes:
Piedad Ayala
Tom Barcellos “The bill, if enacted, now contains provisions that would not only protect the interests of senior water rights holders
Jim Walls in the Sacramento Valley, but would also provide significant, material water policy improvements to current federal
law. The bill, if enacted, would provide an unprecedented federal statutory express recognition of, and commitment
to, California’s state water rights priority system and area of origin protections. This is important for the region to
provide sustainable water supplies for productive farmlands, wildlife refuges, and managed wetlands, cities and rural
communities, recreation, and meandering rivers that support important fisheries.”
Additionally, Title I, Section 105 of the bill permits Delta and Bay Area districts to re-use environmental water once
it has served its purpose, increasing the amount of water available to Northern California communities.
Finally, the vote was bi-partisan, with Democrats Jim Costa (D-California) and Dan Boren (D-Oklahoma) joining
Republicans in adopting the bill 27 to 17.
“The legislation would halt restoration of the San Joaquin River, leaving as much as 40 miles of the river dry, restore
irrigation contracts and override fish and wildlife protections in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.”
This charge, which was also made in the Chronicle’s editorial of February 16, 2012, is categorically false. In fact,
Title II merely replaces the coldwater fishery established under the San Joaquin River Settlement Act of 2009 with a
warm water fishery more conducive to the Central Valley habitat, guaranteeing year round flows. During my opening
statement, I said:
“(The bill) replaces the San Joaquin River Settlement Act that was imposed in 2009 with a workable and vastly less
expensive alternative.
“Let me put the current San Joaquin River Settlement Act in perspective. It will spend more than one billion dollars
to achieve the stated goal of establishing a population of 500 salmon below the Friant dam. That comes to two million
dollars per fish. And that’s without accounting for the costs that will be incurred by Central Valley farmers as water
that is already in critically short supply is diverted to this project that are estimated to increase the actual cost ten-
fold.”
During committee discussion, I went on to say, “The San Joaquin River is on the hot valley floor – the only time it
has been a cold-water fishery was during very wet years and then only sporadically.”
“McClintock negotiated an agreement from fellow Republicans to preserve local water rights to protect his
Sacramento district from the original bill.”
In fact, I said in my opening statement that my office had conducted “a laborious eight-month process of consulting
more than 60 northern California water agencies – in both Democratic and Republican congressional districts -- and
the result is an unprecedented consensus reflected in the amendment.” During the committee debate, I read a list of 11
water districts in Democratic Congressman Garamendi’s district alone that we worked with on amendments to protect
their water rights.
Whatever our personal biases and opinions, we should at least be able to agree that readers are entitled to the truth,
particularly in a story appearing on the front page of a major metropolitan newspaper over a matter of significant
public importance. All of the facts and statements cited above were made during the public meeting and should have
been known to all those who attended it. I believe that this article clearly crossed the line into demonstrable falsehood
and I challenge the management of the Chronicle to set the record straight.
Sincerely,
Tom McClintock
Chairman, Sub-Committee on Water and Power, House Natural Resources Committee
Central Valley reps bill would upend water rights

Carolyn Lochhead
Washington -- Representatives from the Central Valley pushed legislation through a House committee Thursday that
would upend the state's system of water rights, deploying the federal government to extract water from Northern
California farms, fisheries and cities to send to farmers in the valley.
The action by the House Natural Resources Committee came the same day that the House voted to require the federal
government to usurp California's governance of its coastline by requiring offshore leasing for oil and gas drilling.
Neither bill is expected to become law, given strong opposition from California's Democratic senators, Dianne
Feinstein and Barbara Boxer.
But the water bill, HR1837, is a major salvo by Central Valley lawmakers, most of them Republicans but including
Rep. Jim Costa, D-Hanford (Kings County), in a pitched, emotional battle over who gets water in a state whose
antiquated water system is straining under the demands of a burgeoning population, a declining ecosystem and the
nation's most productive farm sector.
Among other things, the legislation would halt restoration of the San Joaquin River, leaving as much as 40 miles of
the river dry, restore irrigation contracts and override fish and wildlife protections in the Sacramento-San Joaquin
River Delta.
"Plain and simple, it's a water raid on the delta," said Rep. John Garamendi, D-Walnut Grove (Sacramento County),
who waged trench warfare in the committee by offering more than 20 amendments. All were defeated, but Garamendi
said he was "laying down a track of information that will be useful later."
Water held in trust
Garamendi said the valley lawmakers are attempting to "obliterate all the environmental laws of the state and federal
governments and simultaneously override the California Constitution," whose public trust doctrine holds that all the
waters of California are held in trust by the government for the people of California.
Feinstein and Boxer wrote a letter to the committee chairman stating their strong opposition, saying the bill would
waive endangered species protections and attempt to provide more water to the valley "without accounting for where
the water will come from or what the impacts will be."
Sponsored by Republican Reps. Devin Nunes of Tulare County, Kevin McCarthy of Bakersfield and Jeff Denham of
Merced, with support from Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Elk Grove (Sacramento County) and Democrat Costa, the
legislation cleared the House committee on a 27-17 vote.
Republicans said the legislation would "end California's man-made droughts, bring jobs and water supply certainty to
the Sacramento and San Joaquin valleys and decrease reliance on foreign food sources."
Costa said that with the world population headed to 9 billion, "the production of food and fiber is a security issue not
only for us but for the world."
Stands no chance
But he conceded that the bill will never be enacted, saying Feinstein's participation was not sought, even though he
said she has been "a champion trying to fight for water in our valley," often to the consternation of Bay Area
Democrats. Costa said the bill "will never bring a single drop of water to our valley."
Cynthia Koehler, legislative director for California water for the Environmental Defense Fund, said the bill was the
boldest attempt to pre-empt state water law she has ever seen.
"There is a fairly significant question about whether it is constitutional," she said. "Congress could say to every state,
'You cannot touch any water rights to preserve fish and wildlife for any purpose at all.' "
House members from the valley blamed their area's high unemployment on water shortages. Denham challenged
Democrats to "come to Mendota and see the 40 percent unemployment rate."
But the Pacific Institute in Oakland concluded in a recent study on the effect of the recent state drought that chronic
unemployment in the Central Valley was mainly the result of the housing downturn.
A matter of rights
McClintock negotiated an agreement from fellow Republicans to preserve local water rights to protect his
Sacramento district from the original bill, which put those rights in question. He argued that the legislation does not
trounce states' rights.
Instead, he said it upholds individual rights guaranteed by the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which
makes it a duty of Congress "to protect the property rights, including water rights, of every citizen against
encroachment" by the state, including water he claims was expropriated to protect fisheries and "cavalierly dumped
into the Pacific Ocean."
Garamendi said the bill fails to develop any new water sources and simply moves water around, violating "160 years
of history, regulations and water rights. The measure "adds to the conflict without resolving the underlying problem."
Costa defended amendments to grant 900 more acre feet of delta water to Kettleman City, a tiny, isolated farming
town in Kings County, and raise Shasta Dam by 15 feet. Republicans warned that the Shasta amendment was an
earmark and would "poison" the overall bill, so Costa withdrew it. The Kettleman City earmark stayed.
Carolyn Lochhead is the San Francisco Chronicle's Washington correspondent. clochhead@sfchronicle.com
Other:
Commentary: The Government-Imposed California Dust Bowl
Nunes Bill Reignites Water War
Editorial: Nunes Scores With Water Bill
Commentary: What's Devin Nunes Up To?
Farmers Want Out of Delta Bills
Nunes Bill Aims to Restore Central Valley Water Supplies
McClintock: Water for Our Future and Job Creation


11409 Road 26 1/2
MAIL
To: Steven Worthley
Subject: Nunes Lays It on the Line and Names Names!
Date: 27-Feb-2012 13:37
Message Id: 4F4B86FE.VIS.PO4.200.200009D.1.3178F.1

VOLUME 4 ISSUE 5
Links:
FEBRUARY 27 2012
:: IN THIS ISSUE
» [2]Contentious?
» [3]Calendar
Links:

Links:
Board of Directors
Denis Prosperi
Chester Andrew
Bob Smittcamp
Russ Waymire
Joe Marchini
Mark Watte
Kole Upton
Piedad Ayala
Tom Barcellos
Jim Walls
Nunes Lays It on the Line and Names Names!
We have posted the Ray Appleton Show from last Thursday when he had
Congressman Devin Nunes as a guest talking about his Water Reliability
Act which he along with Congressmen Jeff Denham and Tom McClintock are
guiding through the House. During the show Nunes talks about the
obstacles he is encountering within the local water community
who have opposed his bill. In particular, Nunes names the Friant Water
Users Authority professional management and lobbyists who he says have
refused to allow their members to take an up or down vote on his bill.
According to Nunes, Friant's refusal to get on board is allowing the
opposition to portray the farm community as divided and makes it more
difficult to make progress.
We also have Jeff Denham's response(article below) to water allocation

announcements last week that he says are "unacceptable" and would be
solved by the Water Reliability Act.
To listen to the Ray Appleton Show just click on 'Listen' and

fast-forward to the 3-minute mark where Devin explains the Water
Reliability Act and if you continue listening for about 20 minutes
you'll hear his proposal and those he says oppose him within the water
community.
Ray Appleton 2.23.12
Rep. Devin Nunes joins Ray live to talk water and rising gas
prices...Also Ray continues the signature gathering campaign for a
citizen legislature
[7]Listen
Links:
7. http://wpc.309d.edgecastcdn.net/80309D/kmjl/common/global_audio/174/52280.mp3
Subscribe
From Congressman Jeff Denham’s office:
“Rep. Denham today issued the following statement in response to the

allocation numbers released by the Bureau of Reclamation. The 30%
allocation level for South-of-Delta agricultural water service
contractors demonstrates severity of the water crisis in the Central
Valley, and the need for H.R. 1837.
“A 30 percent allocation is unacceptable. We had one of the wettest
years in 2011, and instead of storing the water for future use, we let
thousands of acre-feet of water flow from the Delta into the Ocean
every day. Without adequate storage, we will continue to see this
problem year after year,” said Congressman Denham. “We can solve this
problem. My amendment to H.R.1837, which passed out of the Natural
Resources Committee, will allow for more storage construction and allow
families and farmers to plan ahead in order to promote economic growth
and create jobs.”
Background on H.R. 1837:
In 2009, federal regulations to protect a 3-inch fish – the Delta smelt

– led to the deliberate diversion of over 300 billion gallons of water
away from San Joaquin Valley farmers. This cost thousands of farm
workers their jobs, inflicted up to 40 percent unemployment in certain
communities, and fallowed hundreds of thousands of acres of fertile
farmland.
For the past few years, no real action has been taken to reverse the
plight of the San Joaquin Valley and Republican actions to reverse the
situation have been obstructed. H.R. 1837, as amended, reflects
Republican promises to avoid another man-made drought.
The bill:
Allows for the construction of water storage projects throughout the

state of California.
Restores water deliveries to communities by codifying the historic,

bipartisan State/Federal agreement known as the “Bay-Delta Accord.”
Reforms punitive federal laws, the Central Valley Project Improvement

Act and the San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement Act, in order to
provide fairness to ratepayers, promote transparency and
accountability, and save taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.
Allows water users to pay off federal debt early.
Protects and secures private property and senior water rights.
Allows for the construction of water storage projects throughout the

state of California. “
Links:
manage.com/track/click?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=fcdc1ebc6a&e=1b6ea2fb28
manage1.com/track/click?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=183362918b&e=1b6ea2fb28

Links:
10. http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=9ce002dab2&e=7f1c52f176
manage1.com/unsubscribe?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=2b06a413ff&e=7f1c52f176&c=9ce002dab2
13. http://us1.forward-to-friend.com/forward?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=9ce002dab2&e=7f1c52f176

11409 Road 26 1/2
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
:: IN THIS ISSUE Nunes Lays It on the Line

and Names Names!
» Contentious?
» Calendar
We have posted the Ray Appleton Show from last Thursday when he had Congressman Devin Nunes as a guest
talking about his Water Reliability Act which he along with Congressmen Jeff Denham and Tom McClintock are
guiding through the House. During the show Nunes talks about the obstacles he is encountering within the local
water community who have opposed his bill. In particular, Nunes names the Friant Water Users Authority
professional management and lobbyists who he says have refused to allow their members to take an up or down vote
on his bill. According to Nunes, Friant's refusal to get on board is allowing the opposition to portray the farm
community as divided and makes it more difficult to make progress.
We also have Jeff Denham's response(article below) to water allocation announcements last week that he says are
"unacceptable" and would be solved by the Water Reliability Act.
To listen to the Ray Appleton Show just click on 'Listen' and fast-forward to the 3-minute mark where Devin explains
the Water Reliability Act and if you continue listening for about 20 minutes you'll hear his proposal and those he
says oppose him within the water community.
Ray Appleton 2.23.12
Rep. Devin Nunes joins Ray live to talk water and rising gas prices...Also Ray continues the signature gathering
campaign for a citizen legislature
Listen
Subscribe
Board of Directors
Denis Prosperi
Chester Andrew From Congressman Jeff Denham’s office:
Bob Smittcamp
Russ Waymire “Rep. Denham today issued the following statement in response to the allocation numbers released
John "Dusty" Giacone by the Bureau of Reclamation. The 30% allocation level for South-of-Delta agricultural water
Joe Marchini service contractors demonstrates severity of the water crisis in the Central Valley, and the need for
H.R. 1837.
Mark Watte
Kole Upton
Piedad Ayala “A 30 percent allocation is unacceptable. We had one of the wettest years in 2011, and instead of
storing the water for future use, we let thousands of acre-feet of water flow from the Delta into the
Tom Barcellos Ocean every day. Without adequate storage, we will continue to see this problem year after year,”
Jim Walls
said Congressman Denham. “We can solve this problem. My amendment to H.R.1837, which
passed out of the Natural Resources Committee, will allow for more storage construction and
allow families and farmers to plan ahead in order to promote economic growth and create jobs.”
Background on H.R. 1837:
In 2009, federal regulations to protect a 3-inch fish – the Delta smelt – led to the deliberate
diversion of over 300 billion gallons of water away from San Joaquin Valley farmers. This cost
thousands of farm workers their jobs, inflicted up to 40 percent unemployment in certain
communities, and fallowed hundreds of thousands of acres of fertile farmland.
For the past few years, no real action has been taken to reverse the plight of the San Joaquin Valley
and Republican actions to reverse the situation have been obstructed. H.R. 1837, as amended,
reflects Republican promises to avoid another man-made drought.
The bill:
Allows for the construction of water storage projects throughout the state of California.
Restores water deliveries to communities by codifying the historic, bipartisan State/Federal

agreement known as the “Bay-Delta Accord.”
Reforms punitive federal laws, the Central Valley Project Improvement Act and the San Joaquin
River Restoration Settlement Act, in order to provide fairness to ratepayers, promote transparency
and accountability, and save taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.
Allows water users to pay off federal debt early.
Protects and secures private property and senior water rights.
Allows for the construction of water storage projects throughout the state of California. “


11409 Road 26 1/2
MAIL
To: Steven Worthley
Subject: Can Valley Ag Unite for Water?
Date: 28-Feb-2012 11:25
Message Id: 4F4CB9A3.VIS.PO4.200.2000029.1.258D8.1

VOLUME 4 ISSUE 6
Links:
FEBRUARY 28 2012
:: IN THIS ISSUE
» [2]NunesRadio
» [3]WaterWar
Links:
2. http://www.familiesprotectingthevalley.com/news.php?ax=v&n=10&id=10&nid=161
3. http://www.calwatchdog.com/2012/02/22/farmers-want-out-of-delta-bills

Links:
Board of Directors
Denis Prosperi
Chester Andrew
Bob Smittcamp
Russ Waymire
Joe Marchini
Mark Watte
Kole Upton
Piedad Ayala
Tom Barcellos
Jim Walls
Can Valley Ag Unite for Water?
One of the problems Devin Nunes, Jeff Denham and Tom McClintock are
trying to solve in their Water Reliability Act is the damage done to
farmers in the San Joaquin River Settlement of 2009. Farmers,
environmentalists and politicians all agreed to the settlement that
allowed water to flow into the dry river again in exchange for being
able to pump it back into the California water system once it reached
the Delta. A promise made in the agreement was that once it was signed
none of the signees would ever challenge it. The problem with that was
environmentalists were already breaking the agreement before the ink
was dry on the deal. They were in court to shut down the pumps which
would keep farmers from getting the water back from the Delta they were
promised in the settlement.
Families Protecting the Valley exists today to educate people about how
farmers were doube-crossed in this deal and the deal needs to be
fixed. That's what Devin Nunes, Jeff Denham and Tom McClintock are
trying to do. According to the article below "the bill's authors have
rallied the public support of some 70 California water districts, 20
farm organizations and 20 cities and counties, among others." But, not
everyone.
According to Nunes, the Friant Water Users Authority professional

management and their lobbyists are working behind the scenes to scuttle
his legislation and they are also refusing to allow their member
growers to vote up or down on his proposal. The farmers are being shut
out of a decision that impacts their future and their survival.
The Friant Water Users Authority management says they are bound by the
River Settlement deal they agreed to in 2009. Nunes' question for
Friant is this: why are you bound by the deal when the
environmentalists break it every chance they get and broke it
immediately with their pump shut-down doublecross. Why doesn't Friant
just admit that the River Settlement was a bad deal, a deal no one is
adhering to except them and get on board with Congressman Nunes, Denham
and McClintock?
The division created by Friant is allowing the oppositon to portray the

farm community as divided and is making it more difficult for Nunes,
Denham and McClintock to get things done. Here we have a Congressman
who told everyone not to get into the River Settlement in the first
place and now is trying to fix it, yet some are not willing to help.
Contentious bill would reshape the restoration of San Joaquin River
By Michael Doyle and Mark Grossi - The Fresno Bee
Modified Mon, Feb 27, 2

The San Joaquin River's meandering course through central California
would get steered in yet another direction under a far-reaching bill
set for House approval this week.
Salmon would be out. Other fish would be in. One restoration program
would end. Another would start. Water would flow below Friant Dam north
of Fresno, but not nearly as much as currently planned.
Biologically, scientists say, the House proposal has promise.

Politically, it faces strong opposition. Legally, it appears vulnerable
to challenge. Bottom line: When the biggest California water bill in
years hits the House floor, as it is expected to do Wednesday, the San
Joaquin River will be incontrovertibly front and center.
"The San Joaquin River," chief bill author Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Visalia
said, "is the lynchpin of the entire bill."
The river section spans nearly half of the 53-page Sacramento-San

Joaquin Valley Water Reliability Act. The section is titled "Repeal of
the San Joaquin River Settlement," though "repeal" does not really
convey the consequences.
Instead, if the section survives, it would replace a cold-water

fishery, in which salmon return to the San Joaquin River, with a less
expensive warm-water fishery, conducive to other river-loving species.
"I think it's a reasonable thing to propose," said Doug Welch, natural
resources planner with the Chowchilla Water District, which joined
other farm water groups in agreeing to the current salmon plan. "The
jury is still out on restoring a self-reproducing salmon run."
Elsewhere, the new House bill restores longer irrigation contracts,

preempts strict state laws and eases water transfers. It offers more
water for San Joaquin Valley farms, while painstakingly negotiated
language is designed to ease Sacramento Valley fears about supplies
being shipped south.
The overall bill sharply divides the state, and its long-term prospects
are uncertain.
The bill's authors have rallied the public support of some 70

California water districts, 20 farm organizations and 20 cities and
counties, among others.
"This treats our water as the precious resource it is, and restores
balance between human and environmental uses of that resource," said
Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Elk Grove, chairman of the House water and power
subcommittee.
But 10 House Democrats from Northern California oppose the overall

bill, as do the state's two senators and the administration of Gov.
Jerry Brown. The House Democrats, who together represent about 7
million residents, say they were shut out of the months-long bill
drafting that occurred under McClintock's oversight.
"Sacramento is concerned that this legislation would create chaos in

the already challenged context of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta,"
said Sacramento City Council Member Jay Schenirer, adding that,
"Sacramento has not been allowed to be at the table or to address its
concerns."
The bill's San Joaquin River provision blocks a 2009 law, which
Congress passed to implement a lawsuit settlement reached between
environmentalists and Friant Water Users Authority farmers.
The settlement requires additional water to be released through Friant

Dam, and for myriad river channel improvements, so salmon can be
returned starting this year. The average releases would be about
200,000 acre-feet, about 15% of the total available.
The Nunes bill, by contrast, would send an estimated 100,000 acre-feet

of water down the river channel, less than half of the river
settlement's average.
Supporters say a warming climate will make it more difficult for

cold-water fish, such as salmon, to survive as far south as Fresno.
Other native fish might do very well under the alternative warm-water
plan, including trout, Sacramento sucker and threespine stickleback.
But fishery biologist Peter Moyle of the University of California at

Davis says the salmon restoration makes sense in a warming climate. The
San Joaquin may be a refuge for salmon because the river's watershed
taps the high Sierra. Snowfields above 10,000 feet are likely to remain
a source of ice-cold water in spring, he says.
Friant representatives previously floated the idea of a warm-water

fishery during settlement negotiations, but environmentalists insisted
on salmon. Fearing uncertainty if they fought the settlement, Friant
negotiators say they cut the best deal they could rather than face a
court-ordered water loss.
Politically, Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein has shown no sign of

backing off from the settlement legislation she spent considerable
effort pursuing, in alliance with both Friant farmers and
environmentalists.
"Without consulting the settling parties who continue to support the

settlement ... the bill proposes to leave as much as 40 miles of the
river without water," Feinstein and Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer wrote
House members.
Nunes, in turn, accuses Feinstein of being beholden to "radical

environmentalists."
Legally, the 80-page settlement agreement appears at least somewhat

resistant to the kind of change Congress is now considering. While the
new legislation essentially would withdraw the federal government from
the settlement, the agreement states "the settlement may only be
modified in writing upon agreement of the parties."
"The legality of Congress overturning the court-approved settlement to

restore the San Joaquin River is dubious at best," said
environmentalists' attorney Hal Candee. "In any event, it is certain
that this bill would lead the parties back to court, an outcome that
neither farmers nor environmental groups want."

Links:
manage.com/track/click?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=fcdc1ebc6a&e=1b6ea2fb28
manage1.com/track/click?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=183362918b&e=1b6ea2fb28

Links:
9. http://us1.campaign-archive2.com/?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=33b44fd5ad&e=7f1c52f176
manage1.com/unsubscribe?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=2b06a413ff&e=7f1c52f176&c=33b44fd5ad
12. http://us1.forward-to-friend1.com/forward?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=33b44fd5ad&e=7f1c52f176

11409 Road 26 1/2
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
:: IN THIS ISSUE Can Valley Ag Unite for

Water?
» NunesRadio
» WaterWar
One of the problems Devin Nunes, Jeff Denham and Tom McClintock are trying to solve in their Water Reliability
Act is the damage done to farmers in the San Joaquin River Settlement of 2009. Farmers, environmentalists and
politicians all agreed to the settlement that allowed water to flow into the dry river again in exchange for being able to
pump it back into the California water system once it reached the Delta. A promise made in the agreement was that
once it was signed none of the signees would ever challenge it. The problem with that was environmentalists were
already breaking the agreement before the ink was dry on the deal. They were in court to shut down the pumps which
would keep farmers from getting the water back from the Delta they were promised in the settlement.
Families Protecting the Valley exists today to educate people about how farmers were doube-crossed in this deal and
the deal needs to be fixed. That's what Devin Nunes, Jeff Denham and Tom McClintock are trying to do. According
to the article below "the bill's authors have rallied the public support of some 70 California water districts, 20 farm
organizations and 20 cities and counties, among others." But, not everyone.
According to Nunes, the Friant Water Users Authority professional management and their lobbyists are working
behind the scenes to scuttle his legislation and they are also refusing to allow their member growers to vote up or
down on his proposal. The farmers are being shut out of a decision that impacts their future and their survival.
The Friant Water Users Authority management says they are bound by the River Settlement deal they agreed to in
2009. Nunes' question for Friant is this: why are you bound by the deal when the environmentalists break it every
chance they get and broke it immediately with their pump shut-down doublecross. Why doesn't Friant just admit that
the River Settlement was a bad deal, a deal no one is adhering to except them and get on board with Congressman
Nunes, Denham and McClintock?
The division created by Friant is allowing the oppositon to portray the farm community as divided and is making it
more difficult for Nunes, Denham and McClintock to get things done. Here we have a Congressman who told
Board of Directors everyone not to get into the River Settlement in the first place and now is trying to fix it, yet some are not willing to
help.
Denis Prosperi
Chester Andrew
Bob Smittcamp Contentious bill would reshape the restoration of San Joaquin River
Russ Waymire
John "Dusty" Giacone By Michael Doyle and Mark Grossi - The Fresno Bee
Joe Marchini
Mark Watte
Kole Upton The San Joaquin River's meandering course through central California would get steered in yet another direction
Piedad Ayala under a far-reaching bill set for House approval this week.
Tom Barcellos
Jim Walls
Salmon would be out. Other fish would be in. One restoration program would end. Another would start. Water would
flow below Friant Dam north of Fresno, but not nearly as much as currently planned.
Biologically, scientists say, the House proposal has promise. Politically, it faces strong opposition. Legally, it appears
vulnerable to challenge. Bottom line: When the biggest California water bill in years hits the House floor, as it is
expected to do Wednesday, the San Joaquin River will be incontrovertibly front and center.
"The San Joaquin River," chief bill author Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Visalia said, "is the lynchpin of the entire bill."
The river section spans nearly half of the 53-page Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Water Reliability Act. The section
is titled "Repeal of the San Joaquin River Settlement," though "repeal" does not really convey the consequences.
Instead, if the section survives, it would replace a cold-water fishery, in which salmon return to the San Joaquin
River, with a less expensive warm-water fishery, conducive to other river-loving species.
"I think it's a reasonable thing to propose," said Doug Welch, natural resources planner with the Chowchilla Water
District, which joined other farm water groups in agreeing to the current salmon plan. "The jury is still out on
restoring a self-reproducing salmon run."
Elsewhere, the new House bill restores longer irrigation contracts, preempts strict state laws and eases water transfers.
It offers more water for San Joaquin Valley farms, while painstakingly negotiated language is designed to ease
Sacramento Valley fears about supplies being shipped south.
The overall bill sharply divides the state, and its long-term prospects are uncertain.
The bill's authors have rallied the public support of some 70 California water districts, 20 farm organizations and 20
cities and counties, among others.
"This treats our water as the precious resource it is, and restores balance between human and environmental uses of
that resource," said Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Elk Grove, chairman of the House water and power subcommittee.
But 10 House Democrats from Northern California oppose the overall bill, as do the state's two senators and the
administration of Gov. Jerry Brown. The House Democrats, who together represent about 7 million residents, say
they were shut out of the months-long bill drafting that occurred under McClintock's oversight.
"Sacramento is concerned that this legislation would create chaos in the already challenged context of the Sacramento-
San Joaquin Delta," said Sacramento City Council Member Jay Schenirer, adding that, "Sacramento has not been
allowed to be at the table or to address its concerns."
The bill's San Joaquin River provision blocks a 2009 law, which Congress passed to implement a lawsuit settlement
reached between environmentalists and Friant Water Users Authority farmers.
The settlement requires additional water to be released through Friant Dam, and for myriad river channel
improvements, so salmon can be returned starting this year. The average releases would be about 200,000 acre-feet,
about 15% of the total available.
The Nunes bill, by contrast, would send an estimated 100,000 acre-feet of water down the river channel, less than half
of the river settlement's average.
Supporters say a warming climate will make it more difficult for cold-water fish, such as salmon, to survive as far
south as Fresno. Other native fish might do very well under the alternative warm-water plan, including trout,
Sacramento sucker and threespine stickleback.
But fishery biologist Peter Moyle of the University of California at Davis says the salmon restoration makes sense in
a warming climate. The San Joaquin may be a refuge for salmon because the river's watershed taps the high Sierra.
Snowfields above 10,000 feet are likely to remain a source of ice-cold water in spring, he says.
Friant representatives previously floated the idea of a warm-water fishery during settlement negotiations, but
environmentalists insisted on salmon. Fearing uncertainty if they fought the settlement, Friant negotiators say they cut
the best deal they could rather than face a court-ordered water loss.
Politically, Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein has shown no sign of backing off from the settlement legislation she
spent considerable effort pursuing, in alliance with both Friant farmers and environmentalists.
"Without consulting the settling parties who continue to support the settlement ... the bill proposes to leave as much
as 40 miles of the river without water," Feinstein and Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer wrote House members.
Nunes, in turn, accuses Feinstein of being beholden to "radical environmentalists."
Legally, the 80-page settlement agreement appears at least somewhat resistant to the kind of change Congress is now
considering. While the new legislation essentially would withdraw the federal government from the settlement, the
agreement states "the settlement may only be modified in writing upon agreement of the parties."
"The legality of Congress overturning the court-approved settlement to restore the San Joaquin River is dubious at
best," said environmentalists' attorney Hal Candee. "In any event, it is certain that this bill would lead the parties back
to court, an outcome that neither farmers nor environmental groups want."


11409 Road 26 1/2
MAIL
To: NEWSLETTER-CA21@ls1.house.gov
Subject: Big Endorsements for H.R. 1837 - Wall Street Journal, Investor's Business Daily and the Washington Examiner
Date: 28-Feb-2012 18:28
Message Id: 4F4D1CE7.VIS.PO4.200.200001C.1.4CCAF.1
Dear Friends,
Tonight, three of our nation's most respected news sources endorsed H.R. 1837.
The Wall Street

Journal<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203918304577239472081683362.html?mod=googlenews_wsj>,
Investor's Business Daily<http://news.investors.com/article/602480/201202271921/rep-nunes-visalia-brings-water-to-
california-.htm> and Washington Examiner<http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/2012/02/house-can-prevent-
big-green%E2%80%99s-california-dust-bowl/321401> have called on the House to pass the Sacramento-San Joaquin
Valley Water Reliability Act, which will be debated on the House Floor in less than 24 hours.
The Wall Street

Journal<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203918304577239472081683362.html?mod=googlenews_wsj>
"Congressman Devin Nunes of Fresno is trying to restore some certainty to farmers and sanity in the water wars."
Investor's Business Daily<http://news.investors.com/article/602480/201202271921/rep-nunes-visalia-brings-water-to-

california-.htm>
"Nunes' Sacramento-San Joaquin Water Reliability Act goes to a vote in the House Wednesday and if it passes, it will
guarantee that water the farmers paid for finally gets to the parched Central Valley. It will put an end to the sorry stream of
shriveled vineyards, blackened almond groves and unemployed farm workers standing in alms lines for bagged carrots
from China."
The Washington Examiner<http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/2012/02/house-can-prevent-big-
green%E2%80%99s-california-dust-bowl/321401>
"It's highly unlikely but somewhere in America there may yet be a more heart-wrenching example of human misery
caused by Big Green environmental extremism than the dust bowl that California's Central Valley is becoming.
Regardless, the House of Representatives has an opportunity today to put an end to the needless devastation wreaked
upon America's most fertile farmlands in order to protect the delta smelt, a three-inch fish found almost exclusively in the
Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley estuary."
You can read the full editorial content of each paper by visiting them online using the links above or by visiting my website
at http://www.nunes.house.gov/water.
Sincerely,
Description: Description: image003 (3).jpg
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
Description: Description: cid:image002.jpg@01CA0C65.39471370<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>

Description: Description: cid:image004.jpg@01CA0C65.39471370<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Tonight, three of our nation’s most respected news sources endorsed H.R. 1837.
The Wall Street Journal, Investor’s Business Daily and Washington Examiner have called on the House to
pass the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Water Reliability Act, which will be debated on the House Floor in
less than 24 hours.
The Wall Street Journal
“Congressman Devin Nunes of Fresno is trying to restore some certainty to farmers and sanity in the
water wars.”
Investor’s Business Daily
“Nunes' Sacramento-San Joaquin Water Reliability Act goes to a vote in the House Wednesday and if
it passes, it will guarantee that water the farmers paid for finally gets to the parched Central Valley.
It will put an end to the sorry stream of shriveled vineyards, blackened almond groves and
unemployed farm workers standing in alms lines for bagged carrots from China.”
The Washington Examiner
“It’s highly unlikely but somewhere in America there may yet be a more heart-wrenching example of
human misery caused by Big Green environmental extremism than the dust bowl that California’s
Central Valley is becoming. Regardless, the House of Representatives has an opportunity today to
put an end to the needless devastation wreaked upon America’s most fertile farmlands in order to
protect the delta smelt, a three-inch fish found almost exclusively in the Sacramento-San Joaquin
Valley estuary.”
You can read the full editorial content of each paper by visiting them online using the links above or by
visiting my website at http://www.nunes.house.gov/water.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
To: Steven Worthley
Subject: Devin's Deal or Tunnel Deal?
Date: 08-Mar-2012 10:53
Message Id: 4F588F91.VIS.PO4.200.20000FE.1.5A7F3.1

VOLUME 4 ISSUE 9
Links:
MARCH 8 2012
:: IN THIS ISSUE
» [2]Drought
» [3]BondPoll
Links:

Links:
Board of Directors
Denis Prosperi
Chester Andrew
Bob Smittcamp
Russ Waymire
Joe Marchini
Mark Watte
Kole Upton
Piedad Ayala
Tom Barcellos
Jim Walls
Devin's Deal or Tunnel Deal?
The way we see the California water war, there's either got to be
approval of Devin Nunes' H.R. 1837 or a giant tunnel is going to be
built under the Delta. The entire Bay Delta Conservation Plan is
heading toward the idea of a tunnel. That might be a good solution to
the environmental situation in the Delta and providing more water to
farms and people. But, how long will a tunnel take to build? How many
farms can hold out for the decade or two for it to be built? How many
20% or 30% or 40% allocation years can they sustain?
The other problem with the tunnel is the environmentalists themselves.

Will they ever let it be built? If they won't allow dams, why would
they commit to a 35-mile tunnel under the Delta that deprives the Delta
of the very water they say it needs to survive? Does anyone really
believe it won't be tied up in court for years or even decades?
We know this: environmentalists don't have a problem with time or

talking or delays. It all works for them. They like being in court.
They get paid for it. We don't. For us, time is money. They can
afford to outlast us because outlasting us is how they make their
living.
We might also mention that the tunnel will cost at least $14-billion
and we've already seen estimates as high as $23-billion. The debt
service guestimate alone on it will be a billion a year out of the
already bankrupt California budget. On top of all that, it's supposed
to be a 'users pay' project. Can the ag community afford their share
of building it, their share of the debt service and try to make a
living for the 10 or 20 years it's going to take before they get any
water out of it?
So, we would recommend everyone take a good, hard look at Devin's(and

Denham's and McClintock's) H.R. 1837. It solves the problem now and
saves money instead of spending. If people still want to move toward a
tunnel or peripheral canal, they can move as fast or slow as they want
because we'll have water while they do it. The water will be in our
court while the lawsuits and delays go on and on. Time will then be on
our side.
We would also offer this advice for people in and around the Delta and
all environmentalists everywhere: if you believe the tunnel is
inevetible, you might be better off with H.R. 1837. For
environmentalists, it's got to be the lesser of what they
would consider to be two evils. And remember this: if the people of
Southern California ever realize where their water comes from ([7]and
they don't), and vote accordingly, they will get water one way or
another.
Links:
Ending California's man-made drought
Kevin McCarthy, Devin Nunes,Jeff Denham
The man-made drought in California is no secret. Burdensome

environmental regulations restricting water pumping in the
Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta have contributed to hundreds of
thousands of acres of fertile farmland going fallow in recent years.
During California's 2007-2009 drought, the Democratic majority and the
[8]Obama administration stood on the sidelines while farmers were
forced to forgo planting, joblessness rose and families stood in food
lines. It was a huge relief last year when we had abundant rain and
snow, but instead of using 100 percent of that water for farming and
storage, millions of acre-feet of water were allowed to be lost into
the ocean.
Links:
8. http://www.sfgate.com/barack-obama
This year is looking to be as dry as they come, and without adequate

storage, we will continue to see the problem of water shortages year
after year. We must act now to ensure that our communities get every
drop of water possible to grow the crops that feed America and create
the jobs that support families and local economies.
The U.S. House of Representatives did just that on Feb. 29 by passing

the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Water Reliability Act. If enacted,
this bill will get water flowing in California and increase water
storage for future years. Right now, water traveling through the delta
has been reduced from a gush to a trickle because environmentalists
care more about protecting fish than putting Californians back to work.
Protecting ecosystems is important, but so are the crops that help feed
America and produce jobs that promote economic recovery in our state.
This bill takes the zealotry out of these environmental restrictions
and puts California's water delivery system on more balanced and
reliable footing.
In this bill, we return pumping operations to the bipartisan 1994 Bay

Delta Accord. As many probably remember, this accord was hailed as an
end to California's water wars and was roundly praised. The Clinton
administration and other prominent Democrats such as Rep. George
Miller, D-Martinez, and Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt lent their
support, as did Republican Gov. Pete Wilson, environmentalists and
water users in both the Northern and Southern parts of the state. This
was a good deal for everyone - and that's why we used it for the base
of our bill.
By returning water pumping to the previously agreed-upon levels in the

1994 accord, Central Valley families and farmers will see an estimated
increase of 1.4 million acre-feet of water. That's enough to irrigate
460,000 acres of farmland or provide drinking water to more than 1
million households for one year. It's also enough to create up to
30,000 agricultural jobs in the valley, according to economic impact
studies. All told, this is legislation that will put people back to
work, ensure a more reliable water supply to California farmers, and
generate revenue for the federal government. Unlike the Obama
administration's failed economic stimulus, this bill will create jobs
at no cost to the taxpayer. In fact, the Congressional Budget Office
estimates that it will bring in an estimated $221 million by allowing
water contractors to prepay for their water.
The Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Water Reliability Act is smart

legislation that will have positive impacts not just for California
families, farmers and small businesses, but for all of America as well.
We can no longer allow a fish to be prioritized above our families and
food supply. We have to get our priorities right. This bill does that,
and we look forward to the Senate taking it up and joining us in
putting an end to California's man-made water crisis.
Reps. Kevin McCarthy, R-Bakersfield; Devin Nunes, R-Tulare; and Jeff

Denham, R-Merced, represent the Central Valley in the U.S. House of
Representatives.
More:
[9]Commentary: Brash SJV Congressman Shifts California Water Wars

Links:
[10]Commentary: Cost/Benefit Analysis Needed for Tunnel

Links:
[11]Conveyance Tunnel Debt Service $1.1B Annually

Links:
[12]California Delta Would Build Tunnels to Pump Water

Links:
[13]Commentary: You Will Have No Real Say As A Voter in Peripheral

Canal 2.0
Links:
[14]Delta Tunnel Plan Would Increase Pumping

Links:

Links:
manage1.com/track/click?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=be0dae7eeb&e=1b6ea2fb28
manage.com/track/click?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=86f8a67fad&e=1b6ea2fb28

Links:
17. http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=2c6d766b79&e=7f1c52f176
manage.com/unsubscribe?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=2b06a413ff&e=7f1c52f176&c=2c6d766b79
20. http://us1.forward-to-friend1.com/forward?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=2c6d766b79&e=7f1c52f176
11409 Road 26 1/2
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
VOLUME 4 ISSUE 9 MARCH 8 2012
:: IN THIS ISSUE
» Drought Devin's Deal or Tunnel Deal?

» BondPoll
The way we see the California water war, there's either got to be approval of Devin Nunes' H.R. 1837 or a giant
tunnel is going to be built under the Delta. The entire Bay Delta Conservation Plan is heading toward the idea of a
tunnel. That might be a good solution to the environmental situation in the Delta and providing more water to farms
and people. But, how long will a tunnel take to build? How many farms can hold out for the decade or two for it to
be built? How many 20% or 30% or 40% allocation years can they sustain?
The other problem with the tunnel is the environmentalists themselves. Will they ever let it be built? If they won't
allow dams, why would they commit to a 35-mile tunnel under the Delta that deprives the Delta of the very water
they say it needs to survive? Does anyone really believe it won't be tied up in court for years or even decades?
We know this: environmentalists don't have a problem with time or talking or delays. It all works for them. They
like being in court. They get paid for it. We don't. For us, time is money. They can afford to outlast us because
outlasting us is how they make their living.
We might also mention that the tunnel will cost at least $14-billion and we've already seen estimates as high as $23-
billion. The debt service guestimate alone on it will be a billion a year out of the already bankrupt California
budget. On top of all that, it's supposed to be a 'users pay' project. Can the ag community afford their share of
building it, their share of the debt service and try to make a living for the 10 or 20 years it's going to take before they
get any water out of it?
So, we would recommend everyone take a good, hard look at Devin's(and Denham's and McClintock's) H.R. 1837. It
solves the problem now and saves money instead of spending. If people still want to move toward a tunnel or
Board of Directors peripheral canal, they can move as fast or slow as they want because we'll have water while they do it. The water will
be in our court while the lawsuits and delays go on and on. Time will then be on our side.
Denis Prosperi We would also offer this advice for people in and around the Delta and all environmentalists everywhere: if you
Chester Andrew believe the tunnel is inevetible, you might be better off with H.R. 1837. For environmentalists, it's got to be the lesser
Bob Smittcamp of what they would consider to be two evils. And remember this: if the people of Southern California ever realize
Russ Waymire where their water comes from (and they don't), and vote accordingly, they will get water one way or another.
Joe Marchini
Mark Watte Ending California's man-made drought
Kole Upton
Piedad Ayala Kevin McCarthy, Devin Nunes,Jeff Denham
Tom Barcellos
Jim Walls
The man-made drought in California is no secret. Burdensome environmental regulations restricting water pumping
in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta have contributed to hundreds of thousands of acres of fertile farmland
going fallow in recent years.
During California's 2007-2009 drought, the Democratic majority and the Obama administration stood on the sidelines
while farmers were forced to forgo planting, joblessness rose and families stood in food lines. It was a huge relief last
year when we had abundant rain and snow, but instead of using 100 percent of that water for farming and storage,
millions of acre-feet of water were allowed to be lost into the ocean.
This year is looking to be as dry as they come, and without adequate storage, we will continue to see the problem of
water shortages year after year. We must act now to ensure that our communities get every drop of water possible to
grow the crops that feed America and create the jobs that support families and local economies.
The U.S. House of Representatives did just that on Feb. 29 by passing the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Water
Reliability Act. If enacted, this bill will get water flowing in California and increase water storage for future years.
Right now, water traveling through the delta has been reduced from a gush to a trickle because environmentalists care
more about protecting fish than putting Californians back to work. Protecting ecosystems is important, but so are the
crops that help feed America and produce jobs that promote economic recovery in our state. This bill takes the
zealotry out of these environmental restrictions and puts California's water delivery system on more balanced and
reliable footing.
In this bill, we return pumping operations to the bipartisan 1994 Bay Delta Accord. As many probably remember, this
accord was hailed as an end to California's water wars and was roundly praised. The Clinton administration and other
prominent Democrats such as Rep. George Miller, D-Martinez, and Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt lent their
support, as did Republican Gov. Pete Wilson, environmentalists and water users in both the Northern and Southern
parts of the state. This was a good deal for everyone - and that's why we used it for the base of our bill.
By returning water pumping to the previously agreed-upon levels in the 1994 accord, Central Valley families and
farmers will see an estimated increase of 1.4 million acre-feet of water. That's enough to irrigate 460,000 acres of
farmland or provide drinking water to more than 1 million households for one year. It's also enough to create up to
30,000 agricultural jobs in the valley, according to economic impact studies. All told, this is legislation that will put
people back to work, ensure a more reliable water supply to California farmers, and generate revenue for the federal
government. Unlike the Obama administration's failed economic stimulus, this bill will create jobs at no cost to the
taxpayer. In fact, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that it will bring in an estimated $221 million by
allowing water contractors to prepay for their water.
The Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Water Reliability Act is smart legislation that will have positive impacts not just
for California families, farmers and small businesses, but for all of America as well. We can no longer allow a fish to
be prioritized above our families and food supply. We have to get our priorities right. This bill does that, and we look
forward to the Senate taking it up and joining us in putting an end to California's man-made water crisis.
Reps. Kevin McCarthy, R-Bakersfield; Devin Nunes, R-Tulare; and Jeff Denham, R-Merced, represent the Central
Valley in the U.S. House of Representatives.
More:
Commentary: Brash SJV Congressman Shifts California Water Wars
Commentary: Cost/Benefit Analysis Needed for Tunnel
Conveyance Tunnel Debt Service $1.1B Annually
California Delta Would Build Tunnels to Pump Water
Commentary: You Will Have No Real Say As A Voter in Peripheral Canal 2.0
Delta Tunnel Plan Would Increase Pumping

11409 Road 26 1/2
MAIL
Subject: Complimentary Invitation to a Reception with Congressman Nunes May 2nd
Date: 13-Apr-2012 13:35
Join Rep Nunes May 2nd - Comp.pdf [Save] [Open]
Message Id: 4F882B8C.VIS.PO4.200.2000005.1.1F25C7.1
Trouble viewing this email? Read it online

<http://secure.campaigner.com/Campaigner/Public/t.show?Rj3l--D25q-16qEfW1>
http://secure.campaigner.com/accountsmedia/28/284895/dreamstime_l_19391560_c
ampaigner_size.jpg
You are Invited to a Reception with
Congressman
Devin Nunes (CA-21)
Committee on Ways & Means

Subcommittees on Health and Trade
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
With Special Guest Former

Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee
Congressman Bill Thomas
________________________
Wednesday
May 2, 2012
5:30-7:30 PM
_____________________
Hosted by Wendy and Stan Simpson
1543 Sierra Drive, Visalia
COMPLIMENTARY
Please RSVP by April 28th to

Nicky at N <mailto:Nicky@DevinNunes.net> icky@DevinNunes.net
or 559-250-8775
PAID FOR AND AUTHORIZED BY THE DEVIN NUNES CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE
contractors, and foreign nationals are prohibited. Individuals may
contribute up to $2,500 per election (primary and general) for a total of
$5,000. Federal multi-candidate PAC's may contribute up to $5,000 per
election (primary and general) for a total of $10,000. FEC# C0037056
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
You are Invited to a Reception with
Congressman
Devin Nunes (CA-21)

Subcommittees on Health and Trade
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
With Special Guest Former

Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee
Congressman Bill Thomas
________________________
Wednesday
May 2, 2012
5:30-7:30 PM
_____________________
Hosted by Wendy and Stan Simpson

1543 Sierra Drive, Visalia
COMPLIMENTARY
Please RSVP by April 28th to

Nicky at Nicky@DevinNunes.net
or 559-250-8775

Contributions to the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes. Federal law requires us to use our best
efforts to collect and report the name, mailing address, occupation and name of employer of each individual whose contributions exceed $200 in an
election cycle. Contributions by corporations, labor unions, federal contractors, and foreign nationals are prohibited. Individuals may contribute up to
$2,500 per election (primary and general) for a total of $5,000. Federal multi-candidate PAC’s may contribute up to $5,000 per election (primary and
general) for a total of $10,000. FEC# C0037056
MAIL
Subject: House Bill Instructs National Park Service to Stop Horsing Around with Jobs - passed by unanimous consent
Date: 27-Apr-2012 12:41
Message Id: 4F9A940D.VIS.PO4.200.20000DF.1.264CB.1
Dear Friends,
Earlier today, the House moved swiftly to pass a bill that would restore pack animal access to the Sequoia and Kings
Canyon National Parks. The bill, which I introduced late yesterday, was rushed to the House floor thanks to a bipartisan
agreement by House leaders which specifically cited imminent job losses and park access issues (press
release<http://nunes.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=292936>).
Earlier this month, I brought the case of our backcountry horsemen to the attention of the Obama Administration. I was
seeking help in my efforts to protect park access to commercial pack operations. These hardworking men and women
who offer a unique and time-honored service to mountain visitors were the target of a lawsuit. Radical environmentalists
wanted horses and mules removed from the parks. And thanks to an activist federal judge, the backcountry horsemen lost
on the basis of a technicality (see more
here<http://nunes.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=289186>).
The court ruling against the backcountry horsemen sent the Park Service into full retreat, as demonstrated by their
reaction to my request for assistance. The Park Service informed me that commercial pack operations were going to have
to wait until a new plan for issuing permits was completed and endorsed by the court. This meant that for the 2012
calendar year, backcountry horsemen were out of luck. Hundreds of jobs are at risk.
The bill that passed the House today requires the Park Service to issue permits for the next two years, immediately
restoring commercial pack operations. At the same time, the Administration will be able to work with the federal court to
establish a permitting process that brings the Park Service into compliance with the court ruling. This common sense
solution saves important jobs, preserves access to the wilderness, and respects the judicial process.
The Senate must now act. Given the unanimous consent agreement that enabled House passage today, there is no
excuse for the Senate to fail to take up and pass the measure as soon as it is received.
Sincerely,
[cid:image002.jpg@01CD2484.F1C56160]
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
in the body of the message. You can also opt out of all electronic communications by visiting www.nunes.house.gov and
following the instructions.
[cid:image004.jpg@01CD2484.F1C56160]<http://nunes.house.gov/>[cid:image013.jpg@01CD2484.F1C56160]<http://ww
w.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>[cid:image014.jpg@01CD2484.F1C56160]<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/>
[cid:image015.jpg@01CD2484.F1C56160] <http://nunes.house.gov/ConstituentServices/DevinNunesApp.htm>
Law would revive horse packing in Sequoia, Kings Canyon parks

By Michael Doyle - Bee Washington Bureau
WASHINGTON -- In a rare show of bipartisanship, lawmakers on Friday joined forces to keep commercial pack
operations open in Sequoia and Kings Canyon national parks for at least the next two years.
Acting with unusual dispatch, House Democrats and Republicans agreed on legislation moving the National Park Service
to issue the permits for 2012 and 2013. The legislation approved by voice vote will let some 16 pack operators continue
taking vacationers into the parks' designated wilderness areas.
"Time is very crucial here," noted Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., the chair of the House Natural Resources Committee.
"We must act now if there is any hope for preserving the season."
The legislation initially authored by Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Visalia, essentially overrides a park service
decision<http://www.fresnobee.com/2012/04/04/2788652/national-parks-horse-packing-on.html> issued as a result of a
lawsuit filed by the High Sierra Hikers Association. The organization sued the park service three years ago over
wilderness management.
In January, a federal judge in San Francisco ruled the park service violated the Wilderness Act because its 2007 general
management plan for the neighboring national parks did not adequately deal with the issue of commercial stock. In
response, the park service said it would not issue the stock permits until the question was resolved in court.
"I was highly disappointed by the park service's refusal to work with the federal court on an agreement to issue permits in
time for the current season," Nunes declared Friday morning. "This legislation will allow commercial pack operations to
continue in the parks while permitting changes are made to comply with the court's decision. There are hundreds of jobs
at stake."
The legislation still needs approval by the Senate, which could happen quickly.
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Earlier today, the House moved swiftly to pass a bill that would restore pack animal access to the Sequoia
and Kings Canyon National Parks. The bill, which I introduced late yesterday, was rushed to the House floor
thanks to a bipartisan agreement by House leaders which specifically cited imminent job losses and park
access issues (press release).
Earlier this month, I brought the case of our backcountry horsemen to the attention of the Obama
Administration. I was seeking help in my efforts to protect park access to commercial pack operations. These
hardworking men and women who offer a unique and time-honored service to mountain visitors were the
target of a lawsuit. Radical environmentalists wanted horses and mules removed from the parks. And thanks
to an activist federal judge, the backcountry horsemen lost on the basis of a technicality (see more here).
The court ruling against the backcountry horsemen sent the Park Service into full retreat, as demonstrated by
their reaction to my request for assistance. The Park Service informed me that commercial pack operations
were going to have to wait until a new plan for issuing permits was completed and endorsed by the court.
This meant that for the 2012 calendar year, backcountry horsemen were out of luck. Hundreds of jobs are
at risk.
The bill that passed the House today requires the Park Service to issue permits for the next two years,
immediately restoring commercial pack operations. At the same time, the Administration will be able to
work with the federal court to establish a permitting process that brings the Park Service into compliance
with the court ruling. This common sense solution saves important jobs, preserves access to the wilderness,
and respects the judicial process.
The Senate must now act. Given the unanimous consent agreement that enabled House passage today, there
is no excuse for the Senate to fail to take up and pass the measure as soon as it is received.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
"SIGNOFF NEWSLETTER-CA21" in the body of the message. You can also opt out of all electronic
communications by visiting www.nunes.house.gov and following the instructions.
Law would revive horse packing in

Sequoia, Kings Canyon parks
By Michael Doyle - Bee Washington Bureau
WASHINGTON -- In a rare show of bipartisanship, lawmakers on Friday joined forces to keep commercial pack
operations open in Sequoia and Kings Canyon national parks for at least the next two years.
Acting with unusual dispatch, House Democrats and Republicans agreed on legislation moving the National Park
Service to issue the permits for 2012 and 2013. The legislation approved by voice vote will let some 16 pack
operators continue taking vacationers into the parks' designated wilderness areas.
"Time is very crucial here," noted Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., the chair of the House Natural Resources
Committee. "We must act now if there is any hope for preserving the season."
The legislation initially authored by Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Visalia, essentially overrides a park service decision
issued as a result of a lawsuit filed by the High Sierra Hikers Association. The organization sued the park service
three years ago over wilderness management.
In January, a federal judge in San Francisco ruled the park service violated the Wilderness Act because its 2007
general management plan for the neighboring national parks did not adequately deal with the issue of
commercial stock. In response, the park service said it would not issue the stock permits until the question was
resolved in court.
"I was highly disappointed by the park service's refusal to work with the federal court on an agreement to issue
permits in time for the current season," Nunes declared Friday morning. "This legislation will allow commercial
pack operations to continue in the parks while permitting changes are made to comply with the court's decision.
There are hundreds of jobs at stake."
The legislation still needs approval by the Senate, which could happen quickly.
MAIL
Subject: Download the updated U.S. Rep. Devin Nunes APP for Android / iPhone
Date: 06-May-2012 19:00
Message Id: 4FA6CA32.VIS.PO4.200.20000CB.1.287BA.1
Dear Friends,
I am pleased to share with you that my mobile device application has been updated to improve appearance and
functionality. The APP can be downloaded or updated by visiting my website and selecting the appropriate mobile device
platform.<http://nunes.house.gov/ConstituentServices/DevinNunesApp.htm>
I originally commissioned this application because I understand how important it is for you to have access good
information on a timely basis. The Nunes APP helps you keep up with current events and makes it easier for you to share
your thoughts with me.
[cid:image006.png@01CCB66C.24304C50]
Sincerely,
[cid:image001.jpg@01CA2C83.D49876A0]
DEVIN NUNES
Member of Congress
If you would like to contact me, please visit my website at www.nunes.house.gov<http://www.nunes.house.gov/> or select
the contact feature of the DEVIN NUNES APP. If you would like to be added to future Washington updates, visit my
webpage at www.nunes.house.gov<http://www.nunes.house.gov>. You can opt-out of future electronic messages by
clicking here and following the instructions.<https://nunesforms.house.gov/Forms/EmailSignup/Default.aspx?Delete=true>
[cid:image007.gif@01CCB66C.24304C50]<http://nunes.house.gov/>[cid:image008.jpg@01CCB66C.24304C50]<http://ww
w.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>[cid:image009.jpg@01CCB66C.24304C50]<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I am pleased to share with you that my mobile device application has been updated to improve appearance
and functionality. The APP can be downloaded or updated by visiting my website and selecting the
appropriate mobile device platform.
I originally commissioned this application because I understand how important it is for you to have access
good information on a timely basis. The Nunes APP helps you keep up with current events and makes it
easier for you to share your thoughts with me.
Sincerely,
DEVIN NUNES
Member of Congress
If you would like to contact me, please visit my website at www.nunes.house.gov or select the contact feature
of the DEVIN NUNES APP. If you would like to be added to future Washington updates, visit my webpage
at www.nunes.house.gov. You can opt-out of future electronic messages by clicking here and following the
instructions.
MAIL
Subject: Nunes v Hahn on ObamaCare
Date: 17-Jul-2012 07:32
Message Id: 5005150D.VIS.PO4.200.2000049.1.3F51A.1
Dear Friends,
I recently debated ObamaCare with Congresswoman Janice Hahn on Los Angeles' KABC TV. You can watch the debate
here<http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/video?id=8736516>.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
in the body of the message. You can also opt out of all electronic communications by visiting
www.nunes.house.gov<http://www.nunes.house.gov> and following the instructions.
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I recently debated ObamaCare with Congresswoman Janice Hahn on Los Angeles’ KABC TV. You can
watch the debate here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
To: NEWSLETTER-CA21@ls1.house.gov, Rep Nunes
Subject: Food Shortages in America, Part II
Date: 01-Aug-2012 11:22
Message Id: 50191178.VIS.PO4.200.200009D.1.32E87.1
Dear Friends,
Readers of my blog<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/> may remember my

warning<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/2011/04/food-shortages-in-america_14.html> last year about possible food
shortages. Well, CNN is reporting that the worst drought<http://buzz.money.cnn.com/2012/07/31/corn-soybean-prices/> in
more than fifty years has pushed up U.S. corn prices 50 percent in the last six weeks, potentially leading to a spike in food
prices across the board. While the government can't do much to make it rain, it can ease the plight of both farmers and
consumers by ending policies that make the crisis worse.
One immensely damaging policy is the Renewable Fuel Standard, which requires ethanol to be blended into gasoline.
Along with other members of Congress, I have been warning for
years<http://nunes.house.gov/UploadedFiles/2008_ethanol_letter.pdf> that the RFS boosts food prices and suppresses
corn production, as a rising share of the corn crop - currently 40 percent - is converted to ethanol.
In the Ways and Means Committee last year, we helped to cancel the ethanol tax credit. But that is not enough; with price
shocks and food shortages looming, we need action now. As more than 100 of my colleagues and I argue in this
letter<http://nunes.house.gov/UploadedFiles/2012_ethanol_letter.pdf>, the Obama administration must immediately ease
the ethanol mandate, as it is entitled to do when the RFS stands to inflict severe harm on the economy.
It's time to admit the truth - the government's experiment in using food for fuel has failed.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Readers of my blog may remember my warning last year about possible food shortages. Well, CNN is
reporting that the worst drought in more than fifty years has pushed up U.S. corn prices 50 percent in the last
six weeks, potentially leading to a spike in food prices across the board. While the government can’t do
much to make it rain, it can ease the plight of both farmers and consumers by ending policies that make the
crisis worse.
One immensely damaging policy is the Renewable Fuel Standard, which requires ethanol to be blended into
gasoline. Along with other members of Congress, I have been warning for years that the RFS boosts food
prices and suppresses corn production, as a rising share of the corn crop – currently 40 percent – is converted
to ethanol.
In the Ways and Means Committee last year, we helped to cancel the ethanol tax credit. But that is not
enough; with price shocks and food shortages looming, we need action now. As more than 100 of my
colleagues and I argue in this letter, the Obama administration must immediately ease the ethanol mandate,
as it is entitled to do when the RFS stands to inflict severe harm on the economy.
It’s time to admit the truth – the government’s experiment in using food for fuel has failed.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
To: Steven Worthley, Families Protecting The Valley
Subject: Devin's Deal or Tunnel Deal?
Date: 06-Aug-2012 10:07
Message Id: 501F974C.VIS.PO4.200.2000049.1.3F8C3.1

VOLUME 4 ISSUE 52
Links:
AUGUST 6 2012
:: IN THIS ISSUE
» [2]TunnelYes
» [3]TunnelNo
Links:

Links:
Board of Directors
Denis Prosperi
Chester Andrew
Bob Smittcamp
Russ Waymire
Joe Marchini
Mark Watte
Kole Upton
Piedad Ayala
Tom Barcellos
Jim Walls
Remember H.R. 1837? It was Devin Nunes' solution to California's water
war. We first ran the commentary below (Devin's Deal or Tunnel
Deal?) 5-months ago. You might want to read it again because it
compares Devin's H.R. 1837 to the tunnel project proposed by the
Bay-Delta Conservation Plan(BDCP) and recently announced by Governor
Jerry Brown. The newsletter speaks for itself, so there's no need for
a lot of explanation here. But, we should note a couple of things that
have transpired in the meantime. First of all, Congressman Nunes' H.R.
1837 has been passed by the House of Representatives and awaits action
in the U.S. Senate where it is opposed by [7]California Senators
Feinstein and Boxer. Also opposed are Congressional
representatives [8]George Miller and John Garamendi. [9]Miller and
Garamendi also oppose the tunnel plan.
Links:
7. http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/dobegi/continuing_opposition_to_hr_18.html
8. http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/dobegi/continuing_opposition_to_hr_18.html
9. http://garamendi.house.gov/20120716BDCPLetter.pdf

The way we see the California water war, there's either got to be
approval of Devin Nunes' H.R. 1837 or a giant tunnel is going to be
built under the Delta. The entire Bay Delta Conservation Plan is
heading toward the idea of a tunnel. That might be a good solution to
the environmental situation in the Delta and providing more water to
farms and people. But, how long will a tunnel take to build? How many
farms can hold out for the decade or two for it to be built? How many
20% or 30% or 40% allocation years can they sustain?
The other problem with the tunnel is the environmentalists themselves.

Will they ever let it be built? If they won't allow dams, why would
they commit to a 35-mile tunnel under the Delta that deprives the Delta
of the very water they say it needs to survive? Does anyone really
believe it won't be tied up in court for years or even decades?
We know this: environmentalists don't have a problem with time or

talking or delays. It all works for them. They like being in court.
They get paid for it. We don't. For us, time is money. They can afford
to outlast us because outlasting us is how they make their living.
We might also mention that the tunnel will cost at least $14-billion
and we've already seen estimates as high as $23-billion. The debt
service guestimate alone on it will be a billion a year out of the
already bankrupt California budget. On top of all that, it's supposed
to be a 'users pay' project. Can the ag community afford their share of
building it, their share of the debt service and try to make a living
for the 10 or 20 years it's going to take before they get any water out
of it?
So, we would recommend everyone take a good, hard look at Devin's(and

Denham's and McClintock's) H.R. 1837. It solves the problem now and
saves money instead of spending. If people still want to move toward a
tunnel or peripheral canal, they can move as fast or slow as they want
because we'll have water while they do it. The water will be in our
court while the lawsuits and delays go on and on. Time will then be on
our side.
We would also offer this advice for people in and around the Delta and
all environmentalists everywhere: if you believe the tunnel is
inevetible, you might be better off with H.R. 1837. For
environmentalists, it's got to be the lesser of what they would
consider to be two evils. And remember this: if 25-million people of
Southern California ever realize where their water comes from ([10]and
they don't), and realize they are paying for 4-million acre-feet of
State Contracted water they are not getting through the Delta, they
will vote accordingly and they will get water they are paying for one
way or another.
Links:

Links:
manage.com/track/click?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=f4071efb22&e=1b6ea2fb28
manage.com/track/click?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=a954a596a2&e=1b6ea2fb28

Links:
13. http://us1.campaign-archive2.com/?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=a7ec6172ef&e=7f1c52f176
manage2.com/unsubscribe?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=2b06a413ff&e=7f1c52f176&c=a7ec6172ef
16. http://us1.forward-to-friend.com/forward?u=797debbbbe9ac19264cc40ec2&id=a7ec6172ef&e=7f1c52f176

11409 Road 26 1/2
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
VOLUME 4 ISSUE 52 AUGUST 6 2012
:: IN THIS ISSUE
» TunnelYes
» TunnelNo Devin's Deal or Tunnel
Deal?
Remember H.R. 1837? It was Devin Nunes' solution to California's water war. We first ran the commentary below
(Devin's Deal or Tunnel Deal?) 5-months ago. You might want to read it again because it compares Devin's H.R.
1837 to the tunnel project proposed by the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan(BDCP) and recently announced by Governor
Jerry Brown. The newsletter speaks for itself, so there's no need for a lot of explanation here. But, we should note a
couple of things that have transpired in the meantime. First of all, Congressman Nunes' H.R. 1837 has been passed
by the House of Representatives and awaits action in the U.S. Senate where it is opposed by California Senators
Feinstein and Boxer. Also opposed are Congressional representatives George Miller and John Garamendi. Miller
and Garamendi also oppose the tunnel plan.

The way we see the California water war, there's either got to be approval of Devin Nunes' H.R. 1837 or a
giant tunnel is going to be built under the Delta. The entire Bay Delta Conservation Plan is heading toward the
idea of a tunnel. That might be a good solution to the environmental situation in the Delta and providing more
water to farms and people. But, how long will a tunnel take to build? How many farms can hold out for the
decade or two for it to be built? How many 20% or 30% or 40% allocation years can they sustain?
The other problem with the tunnel is the environmentalists themselves. Will they ever let it be built? If they
Board of Directors won't allow dams, why would they commit to a 35-mile tunnel under the Delta that deprives the Delta of the
very water they say it needs to survive? Does anyone really believe it won't be tied up in court for years or
even decades?
Denis Prosperi
Chester Andrew We know this: environmentalists don't have a problem with time or talking or delays. It all works for them.
Bob Smittcamp They like being in court. They get paid for it. We don't. For us, time is money. They can afford to outlast us
Russ Waymire because outlasting us is how they make their living.
John "Dusty" Giacone We might also mention that the tunnel will cost at least $14-billion and we've already seen estimates as high as
Joe Marchini $23-billion. The debt service guestimate alone on it will be a billion a year out of the already bankrupt
Mark Watte California budget. On top of all that, it's supposed to be a 'users pay' project. Can the ag community afford
Kole Upton their share of building it, their share of the debt service and try to make a living for the 10 or 20 years it's
going to take before they get any water out of it?
Piedad Ayala
Tom Barcellos So, we would recommend everyone take a good, hard look at Devin's(and Denham's and McClintock's) H.R.
Jim Walls 1837. It solves the problem now and saves money instead of spending. If people still want to move toward a
tunnel or peripheral canal, they can move as fast or slow as they want because we'll have water while they do
it. The water will be in our court while the lawsuits and delays go on and on. Time will then be on our side.
We would also offer this advice for people in and around the Delta and all environmentalists everywhere: if
you believe the tunnel is inevetible, you might be better off with H.R. 1837. For environmentalists, it's got to
be the lesser of what they would consider to be two evils. And remember this: if 25-million people of Southern
California ever realize where their water comes from ( and they don't), and realize they are paying for 4-
million acre-feet of State Contracted water they are not getting through the Delta, they will vote accordingly
and they will get water they are paying for one way or another.
If you enjoy our newsletter please send it to friends. If you're a member of an organization
please feel free to send it to everyone on your list. If someone sent this to you and you'd like
your own free subscription, sign up here. If you'd like to respond just click 'reply' or send to
john@familiesprotectingthevalley.com


11409 Road 26 1/2
MAIL
Subject: "Somewhere between Critical and Too Late to Deal with It"
Date: 22-Aug-2012 09:59
Message Id: 5034AD71.VIS.PO4.200.200000B.1.11F253.1
Dear Friends,
Following the bankruptcies of Stockton, San Bernardino, and Mammoth Lakes earlier this year, Moody's says
<http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2012-08-17/moodys-more-calif-dot-cities-at-risk-of-bankruptcy> it expects more
California municipalities to go insolvent. The credit rating agency notes that more than 10 percent of the state's cities have
declared fiscal crises.
I'm not sure why so many politicians believe their budgets are exempt from the laws of mathematics. But when you pay
out unaffordable benefits to public employees - including lavish pensions found almost nowhere in the private sector -
eventually, those costs have to be paid off. Budget tricks, accounting gimmicks, and low-ball cost projections - the
methods used by the Obama administration (ObamaCare) and the California Governor's office (high-speed rail) - can fool
people for a while. But in the end, bills have to be paid, one way or another.
What's disturbing is that in some respects, the main thing that distinguishes the federal government's budget from those of
California's failing municipalities is simply the scale of the irresponsibility.
Consider Social Security. In their latest 75-year budget projection<http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/social-
securitys-long-term-funding-gap-exceeds-30-trillion-dwarfing-short-term-surplus/2012/08/10/6a079ea6-e319-11e1-89f7-
76e23a982d06_story.html>, the Social Security trustees estimate the total Social Security shortfall at an unbelievable
$134 trillion. Even adjusted for inflation, the figure is $30.5 trillion in today's dollars, which the Associated Press notes is
eight times bigger than the entire 2012 federal budget.
Social Security trustee Chuck Blahous comments, "To me, urgent doesn't begin to describe it. . . . I would say we're
somewhere between critical and too late to deal with it."
A shortfall of trillions of dollars in a single entitlement program is not something our nation can afford. When you combine
this shortfall with the trillions in unfunded liabilities in Medicare and Medicaid, and join that with the trillion-dollar deficit the
federal government now posts every year, and add that to our current national debt of $16 trillion - you get a level of
indebtedness that will shatter the United States.
Nothing can protect us once we accumulate this kind of ruinous debt - not our military, not our scientists, and not our
politicians. The only solution is to make tough decisions to restructure our entitlements today so that we don't saddle our
children with this disastrous debt tomorrow.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Following the bankruptcies of Stockton, San Bernardino, and Mammoth Lakes earlier this year, Moody’s
says it expects more California municipalities to go insolvent. The credit rating agency notes that more than
10 percent of the state’s cities have declared fiscal crises.
I’m not sure why so many politicians believe their budgets are exempt from the laws of mathematics. But
when you pay out unaffordable benefits to public employees – including lavish pensions found almost
nowhere in the private sector – eventually, those costs have to be paid off. Budget tricks, accounting
gimmicks, and low-ball cost projections – the methods used by the Obama administration (ObamaCare) and
the California Governor’s office (high-speed rail) – can fool people for a while. But in the end, bills have to
be paid, one way or another.
What’s disturbing is that in some respects, the main thing that distinguishes the federal government’s budget
from those of California’s failing municipalities is simply the scale of the irresponsibility.
Consider Social Security. In their latest 75-year budget projection, the Social Security trustees estimate the
total Social Security shortfall at an unbelievable $134 trillion. Even adjusted for inflation, the figure is $30.5
trillion in today’s dollars, which the Associated Press notes is eight times bigger than the entire 2012 federal
budget.
Social Security trustee Chuck Blahous comments, “To me, urgent doesn’t begin to describe it. . . . I would
say we’re somewhere between critical and too late to deal with it.”
A shortfall of trillions of dollars in a single entitlement program is not something our nation can afford.
When you combine this shortfall with the trillions in unfunded liabilities in Medicare and Medicaid, and join
that with the trillion-dollar deficit the federal government now posts every year, and add that to our current
national debt of $16 trillion – you get a level of indebtedness that will shatter the United States.
Nothing can protect us once we accumulate this kind of ruinous debt – not our military, not our scientists,
and not our politicians. The only solution is to make tough decisions to restructure our entitlements today so
that we don’t saddle our children with this disastrous debt tomorrow.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: Podcast on National Security Trip to Middle East
Date: 22-Aug-2012 12:44
Message Id: 5034D418.VIS.PO4.200.200004D.1.3807B.1
Dear Friends,
I recently returned from a national security trip to the Middle East. I spoke with John Batchelor about the volatile situation
there, particularly in Syria. You can listen to our discussion
here<http://nunes.house.gov/uploadedfiles/jbs_082012a.mp3>. To hear other podcasts like this one, download my app
here<http://nunes.house.gov/constituentservices/devinnunesapp.htm>.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I recently returned from a national security trip to the Middle East. I spoke with John Batchelor about the
volatile situation there, particularly in Syria. You can listen to our discussion here. To hear other podcasts
like this one, download my app here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: Eco-extremists Strike Again
Date: 23-Aug-2012 12:54
Message Id: 50362805.VIS.PO4.200.2000033.1.3C66A.1
Dear Friends,
Along with California congressmen Jeff Denham and Kevin McCarthy, I sent a letter today to Secretary of Agriculture Tom
Vilsack seeking the immediate re-opening of the Central Valley Meat Company meat-processing plant in Hanford,
California.
The Department of Agriculture recently suspended all operations at the plant after a video surfaced purporting to show
plant workers mistreating livestock. Citing the idling of hundreds of workers at the plant, the regional economic damage
resulting from its closure, and the fact that the alleged violations never compromised the food supply, we asked Secretary
Vilsack to re-open the plant under enhanced supervision while an investigation of the plant continues.
The video was posted by extremists who are actively working to undermine production agriculture in the United States. In
recent years, these kinds of "activists" have increased their attacks on animal agriculture, and have even carried out acts
of domestic terrorism. For example, in early 2012 a group used improvised explosive devices (IEDs) to blow up fourteen
trucks used for transporting livestock not far from Hanford, citing animal welfare as their excuse. Now, area residents are
confronted with economic terrorism.
You can read our letter here<http://nunes.house.gov/uploadedfiles/usda_letter.pdf>.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Along with California congressmen Jeff Denham and Kevin McCarthy, I sent a letter today to Secretary of
Agriculture Tom Vilsack seeking the immediate re-opening of the Central Valley Meat Company meat-
processing plant in Hanford, California.
The Department of Agriculture recently suspended all operations at the plant after a video surfaced
purporting to show plant workers mistreating livestock. Citing the idling of hundreds of workers at the plant,
the regional economic damage resulting from its closure, and the fact that the alleged violations never
compromised the food supply, we asked Secretary Vilsack to re-open the plant under enhanced supervision
while an investigation of the plant continues.
The video was posted by extremists who are actively working to undermine production agriculture in the
United States. In recent years, these kinds of “activists” have increased their attacks on animal agriculture,
and have even carried out acts of domestic terrorism. For example, in early 2012 a group used improvised
explosive devices (IEDs) to blow up fourteen trucks used for transporting livestock not far from Hanford,
citing animal welfare as their excuse. Now, area residents are confronted with economic terrorism.
You can read our letter here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: After a long delay, USDA lets locals go back to work
Date: 27-Aug-2012 10:15
Message Id: 503B48CE.VIS.PO4.200.200007A.1.6384F.1
Dear Friends,
After a long delay, the USDA today has allowed the Central Valley Meat Company to resume operations with additional
safeguards to prevent the inhumane treatment of livestock. Seeing as there was never any risk of contamination of the
food supply, I commend the USDA's decision, which will allow hundreds of hard-working Americans to get back to their
jobs.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description:

USHRepRGB<http://nunes.house.gov/>Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description:
youtube signature<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>Description: Description: Description: Description:
Description: Description: blogger signature<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/> Description:
cid:image015.jpg@01CD2484.F1C56160<http://nunes.house.gov/ConstituentServices/DevinNunesApp.htm>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
After a long delay, the USDA today has allowed the Central Valley Meat Company to resume operations
with additional safeguards to prevent the inhumane treatment of livestock. Seeing as there was never any risk
of contamination of the food supply, I commend the USDA's decision, which will allow hundreds of hard-
working Americans to get back to their jobs.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: Unions work to create police state
Date: 29-Aug-2012 13:33
Message Id: 503E1A1C.VIS.PO4.200.200005F.1.3A17B.1
Dear Friends,
Reports of union thuggery in California. (Public pension reform, anyone?) The police union is making the police look bad.
Where is the mainstream media?
Buena Park Mayor Fred Smith says he was pulled over and treated as a DUI suspect two years ago after attending a
holiday party. He suspects the Buena Park officers targeted him because of his decisions on the city's council and his
choice of police chief, he said.
Lackie, Dammeier and McGill, which represents more than 120 police associations in California, until recently had
featured on its website a manual for tough negotiating tactics that included targeting city officials until they cave in to union
demands. Buena Park Councilman Fred Smith said he was targeted by a police officer after leaving a party in December
2010. Smith said he was pulled over, told that he smelled of alcohol, and asked to take a field breath test. Smith said that
he blew "all zeros" but was ticketed for straddling a lane. "I was told I should never disrespect officers," Smith said.
Read the full story on the OC Register website here.<http://www.ocregister.com/news/police-369828-righeimer-city.html>
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Reports of union thuggery in California. (Public pension reform, anyone?) The police union is making the
police look bad. Where is the mainstream media?
Buena Park Mayor Fred Smith says he was pulled over and treated as a DUI suspect two years ago
after attending a holiday party. He suspects the Buena Park officers targeted him because of his
decisions on the city's council and his choice of police chief, he said.
Lackie, Dammeier and McGill, which represents more than 120 police associations in California,
until recently had featured on its website a manual for tough negotiating tactics that included
targeting city officials until they cave in to union demands. Buena Park Councilman Fred Smith said
he was targeted by a police officer after leaving a party in December 2010. Smith said he was pulled
over, told that he smelled of alcohol, and asked to take a field breath test. Smith said that he blew "all
zeros" but was ticketed for straddling a lane. "I was told I should never disrespect officers," Smith
said.
Read the full story on the OC Register website here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: Unions work to create police state
Date: 29-Aug-2012 13:51
Message Id: 503E1E51.VIS.PO4.200.2000033.1.3C6E6.1
Dear Friends,
Reports of union thuggery in California. (Public pension reform, anyone?) The police union is making the police look bad.
Where is the mainstream media?
Buena Park Mayor Fred Smith says he was pulled over and treated as a DUI suspect two years ago after attending a
holiday party. He suspects the Buena Park officers targeted him because of his decisions on the city's council and his
choice of police chief, he said.
Lackie, Dammeier and McGill, which represents more than 120 police associations in California, until recently had
featured on its website a manual for tough negotiating tactics that included targeting city officials until they cave in to union
demands. Buena Park Councilman Fred Smith said he was targeted by a police officer after leaving a party in December
2010. Smith said he was pulled over, told that he smelled of alcohol, and asked to take a field breath test. Smith said that
he blew "all zeros" but was ticketed for straddling a lane. "I was told I should never disrespect officers," Smith said.
Read the full story on the OC Register website here.<http://www.ocregister.com/news/police-369828-righeimer-city.html>
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Reports of union thuggery in California. (Public pension reform, anyone?) The police union is making the
police look bad. Where is the mainstream media?
Buena Park Mayor Fred Smith says he was pulled over and treated as a DUI suspect two years ago
after attending a holiday party. He suspects the Buena Park officers targeted him because of his
decisions on the city's council and his choice of police chief, he said.
Lackie, Dammeier and McGill, which represents more than 120 police associations in California,
until recently had featured on its website a manual for tough negotiating tactics that included
targeting city officials until they cave in to union demands. Buena Park Councilman Fred Smith said
he was targeted by a police officer after leaving a party in December 2010. Smith said he was pulled
over, told that he smelled of alcohol, and asked to take a field breath test. Smith said that he blew "all
zeros" but was ticketed for straddling a lane. "I was told I should never disrespect officers," Smith
said.
Read the full story on the OC Register website here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: Toward a New American Alliance
Date: 21-Sep-2012 12:30
Message Id: 505C5DF9.VIS.PO4.200.20000C5.1.39DC1.1
Dear Friends,
America has been slow to react as the international order is upended by revolutions in the Middle East and upheavals
elsewhere in the world. As we watch passively, the world is being remade to our detriment. It's time to re-establish
America's global leadership - not by promoting democracy in far-off lands with hostile populations, but by creating a new
international alliance in which friendly nations voluntarily bind together through mutually beneficial free trade.
Toward that end, today I introduced the Economic Freedom Alliance Act in the House of Representatives. The bill would
advance global free trade through four measures:
* The Transatlantic Commerce and Trade Enhancement Act would authorize the U.S. President to conduct
negotiations with the European Union toward a comprehensive free-trade agreement.
* The United States-Brazil Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade Act would establish a commission between the
United States and Brazil to work toward dismantling mutual trade barriers, promoting commercial opportunities, and in the
long-term, establishing free trade between the two nations.
* The Agriculture Trade Facilitation Act would establish U.S. negotiating objectives for removing improper sanitary
and phytosanitary barriers to U.S. agricultural exports.
* The Generalized System of Preferences Improvement Act would reform the Generalized System of Preferences so
that certain countries with rapidly developing economies will no longer receive trading preferences from the United States
while blocking U.S. imports in their own markets. Instead, they will be encouraged to work with the United States to
remove trade barriers on both sides.
Amid the burning American flags and charred U.S. embassies that dot the world landscape today, we should try a new
approach. The U.S. is now negotiating a multilateral free-trade agreement with Mexico, Canada, Australia, and seven
other nations through the Trans-Pacific Partnership. The Economic Freedom Alliance Act will expand this effort into the
creation of a broad free-trade zone that unites us with peaceful, like-minded allies and sets clear conditions for U.S.
friendship.
Sincerely,
[cid:image001.jpg@01CD8452.E4883990]
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
[cid:image003.jpg@01CD8452.E4883990]<http://nunes.house.gov/>[cid:image005.jpg@01CD8452.E4883990]<http://ww
w.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>[cid:image006.jpg@01CD8452.E4883990]<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/>
[cid:image007.jpg@01CD8452.E4883990] <http://nunes.house.gov/ConstituentServices/DevinNunesApp.htm>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
America has been slow to react as the international order is upended by revolutions in the Middle East and
upheavals elsewhere in the world. As we watch passively, the world is being remade to our detriment. It’s
time to re-establish America’s global leadership – not by promoting democracy in far-off lands with hostile
populations, but by creating a new international alliance in which friendly nations voluntarily bind together
through mutually beneficial free trade.
Toward that end, today I introduced the Economic Freedom Alliance Act in the House of Representatives.
The bill would advance global free trade through four measures:
• The Transatlantic Commerce and Trade Enhancement Act would authorize the U.S. President to conduct
negotiations with the European Union toward a comprehensive free-trade agreement.
• The United States-Brazil Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade Act would establish a commission
between the United States and Brazil to work toward dismantling mutual trade barriers, promoting
commercial opportunities, and in the long-term, establishing free trade between the two nations.
• The Agriculture Trade Facilitation Act would establish U.S. negotiating objectives for removing improper
sanitary and phytosanitary barriers to U.S. agricultural exports.
• The Generalized System of Preferences Improvement Act would reform the Generalized System of
Preferences so that certain countries with rapidly developing economies will no longer receive trading
preferences from the United States while blocking U.S. imports in their own markets. Instead, they will be
encouraged to work with the United States to remove trade barriers on both sides.
Amid the burning American flags and charred U.S. embassies that dot the world landscape today, we should
try a new approach. The U.S. is now negotiating a multilateral free-trade agreement with Mexico, Canada,
Australia, and seven other nations through the Trans-Pacific Partnership. The Economic Freedom Alliance
Act will expand this effort into the creation of a broad free-trade zone that unites us with peaceful, like-
minded allies and sets clear conditions for U.S. friendship.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: Lead from the front with a new economic alliance
Date: 28-Sep-2012 06:28
Message Id: 506543A6.VIS.PO4.200.200007C.1.3BD0A.1
Dear Friends,
U.S. embassies are being torched, U.S. flags are burning, and American diplomats are being murdered in countries that
are supposedly our allies. In National Review Online today, I outline an alternative to Obama's policy of "leading from
behind." Read it here<http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/328732/economic-freedom-alliance-act-devin-nunes>.
Sincerely,
[cid:image001.jpg@01CD8452.E4883990]
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
[cid:image003.jpg@01CD8452.E4883990]<http://nunes.house.gov/>[cid:image005.jpg@01CD8452.E4883990]<http://ww
w.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>[cid:image006.jpg@01CD8452.E4883990]<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/>
[cid:image007.jpg@01CD8452.E4883990] <http://nunes.house.gov/ConstituentServices/DevinNunesApp.htm>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
U.S. embassies are being torched, U.S. flags are burning, and American diplomats are being murdered in
countries that are supposedly our allies. In National Review Online today, I outline an alternative to Obama’
s policy of “leading from behind.” Read it here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: Obama administration "resets" relations with Mexico
Date: 02-Oct-2012 12:49
Message Id: 506AE2DF.VIS.PO4.200.200005D.1.38CF9.1
Dear Friends,
Univision, the Spanish-language TV network, is reporting<http://abcnews.go.com/ABC_Univision/News/fast-furious-

scandal-details-emerge-us-government-armed/story?id=17352694> that a massacre by a Mexican drug cartel involved
U.S. weapons trafficked to Mexico through the Obama administration's Fast and Furious gun-walking operation.
Meanwhile, here's a short analysis<http://blog.heritage.org/2012/10/01/u-s-foreign-policy-should-advance-economic-

freedom/> by the Heritage Foundation of my suggestion<http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/328732/economic-
freedom-alliance-act-devin-nunes> in National Review Online for redirecting U.S. foreign policy.
Sincerely,
[cid:image002.jpg@01CD9FCD.92406C20]
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
[cid:image004.jpg@01CD9FCD.92406C20]<http://nunes.house.gov/>[cid:image008.jpg@01CD9FCD.92406C20]<http://w
ww.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>[cid:image009.jpg@01CD9FCD.92406C20]<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/>
[cid:image010.jpg@01CD9FCD.92406C20] <http://nunes.house.gov/ConstituentServices/DevinNunesApp.htm>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Univision, the Spanish-language TV network, is reporting that a massacre by a Mexican drug cartel involved
U.S. weapons trafficked to Mexico through the Obama administration’s Fast and Furious gun-walking
operation.
Meanwhile, here’s a short analysis by the Heritage Foundation of my suggestion in National Review Online
for redirecting U.S. foreign policy.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
From: Devin@DevinNunes.net
Subject: Join Congressman Devin Nunes Oct 30th in Visalia COMP
Date: 12-Oct-2012 12:36
Join Rep Nunes October 30th COMP.pdf [Save] [Open]
Message Id: 50780EE1.VIS.PO4.200.2000003.1.158971.1
You are Invited

___
Tuesday
October 30, 2012
6:00-8:00 P.M.
___
At the Home of
Alicia & Ken Puryear
5911 W. Prospect Drive
Visalia, CA 93291
COMPLIMENTARY INVITATION
Please RSVP by October 26th on the attached form or by email to

<mailto:Nicky@DevinNunes.net> Nicky@DevinNunes.net.
Thank You
FEC# C00370056
PO Box 6545
Visalia, CA 93290
Office 559.739.8903
Fax 559.739.8994
EFax 888.412.3824
<http://www.DevinNunes.net> www.DevinNunes.net
<mailto:Nicky@DevinNunes.net> Nicky@DevinNunes.net


TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
You are Invited

___
Tuesday
October 30, 2012

6:00-8:00 P.M.
___
At the Home of

Visalia, CA 93291
COMPLIMENTARY INVITATION
Please RSVP by October 26th on the attached form or by email to Nicky@DevinNunes.net.
Thank You
FEC# C00370056
PO Box 6545
Visalia, CA 93290
Office 559.739.8903
Fax 559.739.8994
EFax 888.412.3824
www.DevinNunes.net
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information or otherwise be protected by
law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

MAIL
Subject: Nunes in Washington Post: Kickstarting the economy through business tax reform
Date: 12-Oct-2012 08:53
Message Id: 5077DA79.VIS.PO4.200.20000A1.1.30C30.1
Dear Friends,
Tinkering with tax rates on business is not enough; we need to replace the entire business tax code with a new system
that dramatically boosts economic growth. My proposal for a business tax overhaul appears in the
Washington Post<http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-tax-reform-to-get-businesses-
expanding/2012/10/11/2d536956-0f4a-11e2-bd1a-b868e65d57eb_story.html> today.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Tinkering with tax rates on business is not enough; we need to replace the entire business tax code with a
new system that dramatically boosts economic growth. My proposal for a business tax overhaul appears in
the
Washington Post today.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: A Visit to Boomtown
Date: 26-Oct-2012 14:25
Message Id: 508A9D53.VIS.PO4.200.2000071.1.2B97C.1
Dear Friends,
What will pull our economy into recovery? Contrary to the Obama administration's dreamy pronouncements, it's not
windmills, solar panels, or other forms of "clean energy." These heavily subsidized industries may eventually produce
abundant energy, but that day is far in the future. For now, the 5 million "green-collar jobs" that Obama promised have not
materialized, and the million electric cars he vowed to put on the roads are rarely seen.
What's going to spark our economic recovery is traditional energy - that is, the proven energy sources that transformed
America into an industrial powerhouse. As I explained on the John Batchelor show (listen
here<http://wabcradio.com/FlashPlayer/default.asp?SPID=33447&ID=2559004>), I just returned from a trip to Williston,
where I saw how oil drilling in the Bakken Formation - which stretches across parts of North Dakota, Montana, and
southern Canada - has turned a sleepy North Dakota town into a bustling city. In Williston, the biggest employment
problem is that they can't get enough workers there fast enough to fill all the available jobs. Work on oil rigs often starts at
$100,000 a year, and many other jobs offer higher salaries than I've seen anywhere else for comparable positions.
Housing prices are skyrocketing, and the physical infrastructure is developing at a breakneck pace - the place is an
absolute boomtown.
[cid:image001.jpg@01CDB39E.40293720]
Williston, ND
This is all enabled by horizontal drilling, hydraulic fracking, and other advances in drilling technology and methods. These
innovations have helped boost U.S. oil output by 7 percent this year, the biggest jump since 1951. As the AP
reports<http://m.apnews.com/ap/db_268744/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=OvzIOrCt>, "U.S. oil output is surging so fast
that the United States could soon overtake Saudi Arabia as the world's biggest producer." Furthermore, "Increased drilling
is driving economic growth in states such as North Dakota, Oklahoma, Wyoming, Montana and Texas, all of which have
unemployment rates far below the national average of 7.8 percent. North Dakota is at 3 percent; Oklahoma, 5.2."
Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal
finds<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444549204578020602281237088.html?mod=WSJ_WSJ_US_New
s_5> that America's recent surge in natural gas production is boosting our manufacturing sector. According to the Journal,
"Economists at Citigroup Inc. earlier this year estimated that increased domestic oil and gas production, and the activity
that flows from it, would create up to 3.6 million new jobs by 2020 and boost annual economic output by between 2% and
3.3%."
This boom in oil and gas production is occurring almost entirely on private lands. That's unsurprising - through its veto of
the Keystone XL pipeline, its lavish funding of failing green energy schemes, the thickets of regulation it lays upon oil and
gas drillers, and countless other incomprehensible decisions, the Obama administration has repeatedly shown a bizarre
hostility to traditional energy.
As usual, we have to rely on the private sector. America could become the world's indispensable energy producer, and
hundreds - maybe even thousands - of booming towns like Williston could pop up across the nation - if the government
will just stay out of the way.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
What will pull our economy into recovery? Contrary to the Obama administration’s dreamy
pronouncements, it’s not windmills, solar panels, or other forms of “clean energy.” These heavily subsidized
industries may eventually produce abundant energy, but that day is far in the future. For now, the 5 million
“green-collar jobs” that Obama promised have not materialized, and the million electric cars he vowed to put
on the roads are rarely seen.
What’s going to spark our economic recovery is traditional energy – that is, the proven energy sources that
transformed America into an industrial powerhouse. As I explained on the John Batchelor show (listen here),
I just returned from a trip to Williston, where I saw how oil drilling in the Bakken Formation - which
stretches across parts of North Dakota, Montana, and southern Canada – has turned a sleepy North Dakota
town into a bustling city. In Williston, the biggest employment problem is that they can’t get enough workers
there fast enough to fill all the available jobs. Work on oil rigs often starts at $100,000 a year, and many
other jobs offer higher salaries than I’ve seen anywhere else for comparable positions. Housing prices are
skyrocketing, and the physical infrastructure is developing at a breakneck pace – the place is an absolute
boomtown.
Williston, ND
This is all enabled by horizontal drilling, hydraulic fracking, and other advances in drilling technology and
methods. These innovations have helped boost U.S. oil output by 7 percent this year, the biggest jump since
1951. As the AP reports, “U.S. oil output is surging so fast that the United States could soon overtake Saudi
Arabia as the world's biggest producer.” Furthermore, “Increased drilling is driving economic growth in
states such as North Dakota, Oklahoma, Wyoming, Montana and Texas, all of which have unemployment
rates far below the national average of 7.8 percent. North Dakota is at 3 percent; Oklahoma, 5.2.”
Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal finds that America’s recent surge in natural gas production is boosting
our manufacturing sector. According to the Journal, “Economists at Citigroup Inc. earlier this year estimated
that increased domestic oil and gas production, and the activity that flows from it, would create up to 3.6
million new jobs by 2020 and boost annual economic output by between 2% and 3.3%.”
This boom in oil and gas production is occurring almost entirely on private lands. That’s unsurprising –
through its veto of the Keystone XL pipeline, its lavish funding of failing green energy schemes, the thickets
of regulation it lays upon oil and gas drillers, and countless other incomprehensible decisions, the Obama
administration has repeatedly shown a bizarre hostility to traditional energy.
As usual, we have to rely on the private sector. America could become the world’s indispensable energy
producer, and hundreds – maybe even thousands – of booming towns like Williston could pop up across the
nation – if the government will just stay out of the way.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: Reminder - Join us for the Election Night Party
Date: 05-Nov-2012 19:22
Victory Party postcard.pdf [Save] [Open]
Message Id: 509811E5.VIS.PO4.200.20000DC.1.2FAD9.1
Central Valley Republican
Election Night Party
Hosted by candidates including:

Assemblywoman Connie Conway, and
Assemblyman and Candidate for Congress David Valadao.
At St. Johns Hall . 8301 81/2 Ave . Hanford, CA
Tuesday. November 6th.
Begins at 8 PM (After the polls and phone banks close).
Admission is Free. No-Host Beverages
Please RSVP to Nicky@DevinNunes.net, terra.brusseau@gmail.com,

Chairman@tularegop.com or 559.739.8903 or to any of the candidates campaign
offices.
Call the campaigns now and volunteer to help ensure victory!

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Central Valley Republican
Election Night Party
Hosted by candidates including:

Assemblywoman Connie Conway, and
Assemblyman and Candidate for Congress David Valadao.
At St. Johns Hall . 8301 81/2 Ave . Hanford, CA
Tuesday. November 6th.
Begins at 8 PM (After the polls and phone banks close).
Admission is Free. No-Host Beverages
Please RSVP to Nicky@DevinNunes.net, terra.brusseau@gmail.com,

Chairman@tularegop.com or 559.739.8903 or to any of the candidates campaign
offices.
Call the campaigns now and
volunteer to help ensure
victory!

MAIL
Subject: Golden State Fiscal Cliff
Date: 30-Nov-2012 08:14
Message Id: 50B86AEE.VIS.PO4.200.20000EE.1.69D80.1
Dear Friends,
The New York Times recently announced<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/28/us/california-shows-signs-of-

resurgence.html?pagewanted=all> that things are looking up in California now that we've approved the Prop. 30 tax hike.
At the risk of contradicting the New York gurus, I explain my own views on California's future in the Fresno
Bee<http://www.fresnobee.com/2012/11/30/3084062/devin-nunes-californias-day-of.html> today.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
The New York Times recently announced that things are looking up in California now that we’ve approved
the Prop. 30 tax hike. At the risk of contradicting the New York gurus, I explain my own views on
California’s future in the Fresno Bee today.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: Aboard the Stennis
Date: 17-Dec-2012 04:13
Message Id: 50CE9BF9.VIS.PO4.200.20000C3.1.37782.1
Dear Friends,
I recently met with sailors from NAS Lemoore aboard the USS Stennis in the Persian Gulf. Much appreciation for these
folks who'll miss Christmas with their families.
[cid:image002.jpg@01CDD884.7173F580]
Sincerely,
[cid:image001.jpg@01CDDB78.A77D2F10]
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
[cid:image003.jpg@01CDDB78.A77D2F10]<http://nunes.house.gov/>[cid:image004.jpg@01CDDB78.A77D2F10]<http://w
ww.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>[cid:image005.jpg@01CDDB78.A77D2F10]<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/>
[cid:image006.jpg@01CDDB78.A77D2F10] <http://nunes.house.gov/ConstituentServices/DevinNunesApp.htm>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I recently met with sailors from NAS Lemoore aboard the USS Stennis in the Persian Gulf. Much
appreciation for these folks who'll miss Christmas with their families.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: Rep. Devin Nunes Appointed Chairman of Ways and Means Subcommittee on Trade
Date: 15-Jan-2013 11:25
Message Id: 50F53CC0.VIS.PO4.200.200001B.1.46031.1
Dear Friends,
Please see the following press release announcing my new appointment.
Washington, D.C. - Representative Devin Nunes (R-CA) today was appointed by the House Ways and Means Committee
as Chairman of the Subcommittee on Trade.
"It's an honor to have been given this responsibility at a time when expanding trade is one of the vital ways to improve our
sluggish economy," said Rep. Nunes.
The Ways and Means Committee has jurisdiction over taxes, international trade, Social Security, Medicare, and various
welfare programs, among other areas. The jurisdiction of the Subcommittee on Trade includes tariffs, import and export
policies, customs, international trade rules, and commodity agreements.
"During his tenure on the Committee, Rep. Nunes has been a key player in developing economic policies that help create
more jobs in this country," declared Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp. "In his new role as Trade
Subcommittee Chairman, his expertise will be critical to creating new opportunities to sell American-made goods and
services around the globe while holding our competitors accountable. I look forward to working closely with him to expand
America's share of the global marketplace."
Rep. Nunes identified progress toward a U.S.-EU free trade agreement and the expansion of the Trans-Pacific
Partnership as priorities for his tenure as Chairman of the Trade Subcommittee. "Boosting U.S. participation in free and
fair trade will benefit both the United States and our trading partners," he said. "It will open new opportunities to promote
economic growth for my constituents in California's San Joaquin Valley, as well as for the agriculture, manufacturing, and
service industries throughout America."
Congressman Nunes, who represents parts of Tulare and Fresno Counties, also serves on the House Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence. He was first elected to Congress in 2002.
Sincerely,
[cid:image001.jpg@01CDDB78.A77D2F10]
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
[cid:image003.jpg@01CDDB78.A77D2F10]<http://nunes.house.gov/>[cid:image004.jpg@01CDDB78.A77D2F10]<http://w
ww.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>[cid:image005.jpg@01CDDB78.A77D2F10]<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/>
[cid:image006.jpg@01CDDB78.A77D2F10] <http://nunes.house.gov/ConstituentServices/DevinNunesApp.htm>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Please see the following press release announcing my new appointment.
Washington, D.C. – Representative Devin Nunes (R-CA) today was appointed by the House Ways and
Means Committee as Chairman of the Subcommittee on Trade.
“It’s an honor to have been given this responsibility at a time when expanding trade is one of the vital ways
to improve our sluggish economy,” said Rep. Nunes.
The Ways and Means Committee has jurisdiction over taxes, international trade, Social Security, Medicare,
and various welfare programs, among other areas. The jurisdiction of the Subcommittee on Trade includes
tariffs, import and export policies, customs, international trade rules, and commodity agreements.
“During his tenure on the Committee, Rep. Nunes has been a key player in developing economic policies
that help create more jobs in this country,” declared Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp. “In
his new role as Trade Subcommittee Chairman, his expertise will be critical to creating new opportunities to
sell American-made goods and services around the globe while holding our competitors accountable. I look
forward to working closely with him to expand America’s share of the global marketplace.”
Rep. Nunes identified progress toward a U.S.-EU free trade agreement and the expansion of the Trans-
Pacific Partnership as priorities for his tenure as Chairman of the Trade Subcommittee. “Boosting U.S.
participation in free and fair trade will benefit both the United States and our trading partners,” he said. “It
will open new opportunities to promote economic growth for my constituents in California’s San Joaquin
Valley, as well as for the agriculture, manufacturing, and service industries throughout America.”
Congressman Nunes, who represents parts of Tulare and Fresno Counties, also serves on the House
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. He was first elected to Congress in 2002.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: Nunes offices seeking interns
Date: 16-Jan-2013 08:37
Message Id: 50F666BD.VIS.PO4.200.2000054.1.50CB8.1
Dear Friends,
I currently have internships available in my Visalia and Washington, D.C., offices. If you know someone who is interested
in politics and public affairs, wants to gain professional experience, and can excel in a fast-paced environment, please
pass along this message.
Interns provide critical staff support and often work at public events, conduct research, and help with special projects. For
spring internships, candidates must submit their applications as soon as possible; for summer internships, applications
must be submitted by March 29, 2013. I accept both part-time and full-time applicants.
All prospective interns must have a high school diploma. In addition, they must be enrolled in or have recently graduated
from an accredited college or university. An application can be downloaded from my website at
http://nunes.house.gov/constituentservices/internships.htm.
For answers to questions about my intern program, please call (559) 733-3861.
Sincerely,
[cid:image001.jpg@01CDF3DA.CAD46670]
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
[cid:image002.jpg@01CDF3DA.CAD46670]<http://nunes.house.gov/>[cid:image003.jpg@01CDF3DA.CAD46670]<http://
www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>[cid:image004.jpg@01CDF3DA.CAD46670]<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/>
[cid:image005.jpg@01CDF3DA.CAD46670] <http://nunes.house.gov/ConstituentServices/DevinNunesApp.htm>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I currently have internships available in my Visalia and Washington, D.C., offices. If you know someone
who is interested in politics and public affairs, wants to gain professional experience, and can excel in a fast-
paced environment, please pass along this message.
Interns provide critical staff support and often work at public events, conduct research, and help with special
projects. For spring internships, candidates must submit their applications as soon as possible; for summer
internships, applications must be submitted by March 29, 2013. I accept both part-time and full-time
applicants.
All prospective interns must have a high school diploma. In addition, they must be enrolled in or have
recently graduated from an accredited college or university. An application can be downloaded from my
website at http://nunes.house.gov/constituentservices/internships.htm.
For answers to questions about my intern program, please call (559) 733-3861.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: Follow the headlines with the Nunes Digest
Date: 08-Feb-2013 13:20
Message Id: 5114FB8E.VIS.PO4.200.2000016.1.13C3A2.1
Dear Friends,
If you want to catch up on the news over the weekend, take a look at the Nunes Digest at the bottom of my
website<http://nunes.house.gov/>. Updated on Fridays, the digest covers local, state, national, and international issues,
including in-depth features you may have missed during the week.
[cid:image007.jpg@01CE0616.301060F0]<http://nunes.house.gov/>
Sincerely,
[Description: image003 (3).jpg]

Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
[Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description:

USHRepRGB]<http://nunes.house.gov/>[Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description:
Description: youtube signature]<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>[Description: Description: Description:
Description: Description: Description: Description: blogger signature]<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/> [Description:
Description: cid:image015.jpg@01CD2484.F1C56160]
<http://nunes.house.gov/ConstituentServices/DevinNunesApp.htm>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
If you want to catch up on the news over the weekend, take a look at the Nunes Digest at the bottom of my
website. Updated on Fridays, the digest covers local, state, national, and international issues, including in-
depth features you may have missed during the week.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: New Nunes op-ed
Date: 15-Feb-2013 09:58
Message Id: 511E06C3.VIS.PO18.200.2000046.1.619.1
Dear Friends,
I have a new article today in National Review Online. Read it

here<http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/340650/government-party-devin-nunes>.
Sincerely,

Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
[Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description:

USHRepRGB]<http://nunes.house.gov/>[Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description:
Description: youtube signature]<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>[Description: Description: Description:
Description: Description: Description: Description: blogger signature]<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/> [Description:
Description: cid:image015.jpg@01CD2484.F1C56160]
<http://nunes.house.gov/ConstituentServices/DevinNunesApp.htm>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I have a new article today in National Review Online. Read it here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
From: lollie99@att.net
Subject: Fw: Cong. Devin Nunes Talking sequester with Ray Appleton
Date: 21-Feb-2013 09:33
Message Id: 5125E9E3.VIS.PO18.200.200000D.1.5E2.1
From: Rep Nunes <Rep.Nunes@MAIL.HOUSE.GOV>

>
>Subject: Talking sequester with Ray Appleton
>
>Date: February 21, 2013 6:50:15 AM PST
>
>To: NEWSLETTER-CA21@ls1.house.gov
>
>Reply-To: Rep Nunes <Rep.Nunes@MAIL.HOUSE.GOV>
>
>Dear Friends,
>
>I’ll be on the Ray Appleton show this afternoon at 11:00 – 12:00 PST. Listen
>live here.
>
>Among other topics, we’ll be discussing the sequester. Undoubtedly, it’s not the
>ideal way to cut spending – defense is hit too hard and entitlements are not
>restructured. However, since the Democrats refuse to replace the sequester with
>targeted spending cuts and are pressing for even more tax hikes, it looks like
>the sequester will go through. President Obama is feigning outrage, but as
>Speaker Boehner points out, the sequester was Obama’s idea in the first place,
>conceived as a way to avoid bipartisan deficit reduction steps recommended in
>Congress. Expect more of these fiscal crises until this administration gets
>serious about restraining out-of-control government spending.
>
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Devin Nunes
>MEMBER OF CONGRESS
>If you would like to contact me, please visit my website
>at www.nunes.house.gov. If you would like to be removed from my mailing list,
>please send a message toLISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.GOV with the text "SIGNOFF
>NEWSLETTER-CA21" in the body of the message. You can also opt out of all
>electronic communications by visiting www.nunes.house.gov and following the
>instructions.
>
>
>
>
>
>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
From: Rep Nunes <Rep.Nunes@MAIL.HOUSE.GOV>

Subject: Talking sequester with Ray Appleton
Date: February 21, 2013 6:50:15 AM PST
Reply-To: Rep Nunes <Rep.Nunes@MAIL.HOUSE.GOV>
Dear Friends,
I’ll be on the Ray Appleton show this afternoon at 11:00 – 12:00 PST. Listen live here.
Among other topics, we’ll be discussing the sequester. Undoubtedly, it’s not the ideal way to cut
spending – defense is hit too hard and entitlements are not restructured. However, since the
Democrats refuse to replace the sequester with targeted spending cuts and are pressing for
even more tax hikes, it looks like the sequester will go through. President Obama is feigning
outrage, but as Speaker Boehner points out, the sequester was Obama’s idea in the first
place, conceived as a way to avoid bipartisan deficit reduction steps recommended in
Congress. Expect more of these fiscal crises until this administration gets serious about
restraining out-of-control government spending.
Sincerely ,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
If you would like to contact me, please visit my website at www.nunes.house.gov . If you would
like to be removed from my mailing list, please send a message to LISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.
GOV with the text "SIGNOFF NEWSLETTER-CA21" in the body of the message. You can also
opt out of all electronic communications by visiting www.nunes.house.gov and following the
instructions.
MAIL
To: Rep Nunes, NEWSLETTER-CA21@LS1.HOUSE.GOV
Subject: Yet another Obama administration scandal
Date: 16-May-2013 11:33
Message Id: 5194C3F2.VIS.PO18.200.20000B5.1.931.1
Dear Friends,
It’s recently been revealed that the Department of Justice accessed phone records from the Associated Press while
investigating a national security leak. This included seizing AP phone records from the House of Representatives Press
Gallery, which is often used for phone conversations between reporters and Members of Congress. I explain my views on
the issue in a new article here<http://blogs.rollcall.com/goppers/did-justice-monitor-congress-phone-calls-with-the-ap/>.
These investigative tactics, especially when considered together with recently revealed IRS abuses and the Obama
administration’s dissembling about the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, provoke serious concerns about this
administration’s commitment to transparency and the rule of law.
Congress will continue investigating these matters, and rest assured that we will hold accountable anyone who abused
the public’s trust.
Sincerely,
[cid:image009.jpg@01CE4D89.8A979010]
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
[cid:image004.jpg@01CE4D87.EF779B80]<http://nunes.house.gov/>[cid:image005.jpg@01CE4D87.EF779B80]<http://w
ww.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>[cid:image006.jpg@01CE4D87.EF779B80]<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/>
[cid:image007.jpg@01CE4D87.EF779B80] <http://nunes.house.gov/ConstituentServices/DevinNunesApp.htm>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
It’s recently been revealed that the Department of Justice accessed phone records from the Associated Press
while investigating a national security leak. This included seizing AP phone records from the House of
Representatives Press Gallery, which is often used for phone conversations between reporters and Members
of Congress. I explain my views on the issue in a new article here.
These investigative tactics, especially when considered together with recently revealed IRS abuses and the
Obama administration’s dissembling about the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, provoke serious
concerns about this administration’s commitment to transparency and the rule of law.
Congress will continue investigating these matters, and rest assured that we will hold accountable anyone
who abused the public’s trust.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
To: Congressman_Devin_Nunes_bedzzs_gmaafbg@cp20.com, Steven Worthley
Subject: Join My Friend Assembly Candidate Rudy Mendoza June 21st For His Kickoff Event
Date: 10-Jun-2013 16:17
Message Id: 51B5FC08.VIS.PO18.200.2000033.1.A1A.1
Please Join me in Support of my Friend the Mayor of Woodlake
Rudy Mendoza
-Candidate for California State Assembly (District 26)
for the Mendoza For Assembly Campaign Kick Off Event!
With Special Guest Assemblywoman Connie Conway

_______________________
Friday
June 21, 2013
6:00-8:00 PM
_____________________
Hosted by Bruce Kopitar

33855 Blair Road - Woodlake, CA 93286
Leadership Levels:
$4,100 Platinum
$1,500 Gold
$500 Silver
or $100 per couple
Please RSVP by June 19th to

Info@MendozaForAssembly.com or 559-334-3760
You are subscribed to this mailing list as sworthley@co.tulare.ca.us. Please use the link below to modify your message
preferences or to unsubscribe from any future mailings. We will respect all unsubscribe requests.
http://trk.cp20.com/Tracking/t.fo?5kant--fdvq-kete8u6&sl=3b&t=5&_v=2
Powered by Campaigner
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Please Join me in Support of my Friend
the Mayor of Woodlake
Rudy Mendoza
Candidate for California State Assembly (District 26)
for the Mendoza For Assembly

Campaign Kick Off Event!
With Special Guest

Assemblywoman Connie Conway
_______________________
Friday
June 21, 2013
6:00-8:00 PM
_____________________
Hosted by Bruce Kopitar

33855 Blair Road - Woodlake, CA 93286
Leadership Levels:
$4,100 Platinum
$1,500 Gold
$500 Silver
or $100 per couple
Please RSVP by June 19th to

Info@MendozaForAssembly.com or 559-334-3760
You are subscribed to this mailing list as sworthley@co.tulare.ca.us. Please click here to modify your
message preferences or to unsubscribe from any future mailings. We will respect all unsubscribe requests.
MAIL
Subject: Young Fresno pilot enters the record books
Date: 12-Jul-2013 15:45
Message Id: 51E0247F.VIS.PO18.200.20000C8.1.F87.1
[cid:image003.jpg@01CE7F2D.7D94E950]
Dear Friends,
At a luncheon hosted by Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central California today, I had the honor of introducing and presenting
an honorary Congressional resolution to Jack Wiegand, an extraordinary young man from Fresno who recently became
the youngest person to fly solo around the world. During the event, the 21 year old shared photo slides from his trip, which
lasted 59 days and covered 21,000 nautical miles across twelve countries. Congratulations to Jack on his incredible
accomplishment.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
At a luncheon hosted by Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central

California today, I had the honor of introducing and presenting an
honorary Congressional resolution to Jack Wiegand, an extraordinary
young man from Fresno who recently became the youngest person to
fly solo around the world. During the event, the 21 year old shared
photo slides from his trip, which lasted 59 days and covered 21,000
nautical miles across twelve countries. Congratulations to Jack on his
incredible accomplishment.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: Weekend reading
Date: 23-Aug-2013 15:15
Message Id: 52177C8B.VIS.PO18.200.2000021.1.C89.1
Dear Friends,
If you want to catch up on the week's news, take a look at the Nunes Digest on my website
here<http://nunes.house.gov/>.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
If you want to catch up on the week’s news, take a look at the Nunes Digest on my website here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
From: MikeCox@visaliachamber.org
Subject: Congressman Devin Nunes: Time is running out please register today.
Date: 29-Aug-2013 11:37
Message Id: 521F328D.VIS.PO18.200.200008C.1.AAB.1
Time is running out please register today.

Mike
Dear fellow Chamber member, we would like to invite you to meet Congressman Devin Nunes. Let's hear what is going on
in Washington D.C. Come and have breakfast with us at the Holiday Inn. We look forward to seeing you there. Please
register as soon as you can we have limited seating.
Mike
mikecox@visaliachamber.org<mailto:mikecox@visaliachamber.org>
C-287-7976
O-734-5876
[cid:image002.jpg@01CEA4A6.8D04EE00]
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Time is running out please register today.
Mike
Dear fellow Chamber member, we would like to invite you to meet Congressman Devin
Nunes. Let’s hear what is going on in Washington D.C. Come and have breakfast with us at
the Holiday Inn. We look forward to seeing you there. Please register as soon as you can we
have limited seating.
Mike
mikecox@visaliachamber.org
C-287-7976
O-734-5876
MAIL
Subject: Nunes on Syria
Date: 07-Sep-2013 12:31
Message Id: 522B1CAA.VIS.PO18.200.200001C.1.11EE.1
Dear Friends,
As President Obama encourages Congress to authorize the use of force in Syria, I am working on a bipartisan effort in the
House and Senate to oppose the President's request. I believe that non-military options have not yet been exhausted, and
that the President has not clearly explained to Congress the political goals and military objectives of his plan of action, nor
his strategy to deal with the possible consequences of a military strike. You can read more about my position in articles at:
* The Fresno Bee (here<http://news.fresnobeehive.com/archives/3669>)
* The Business Journal (here<http://www.thebusinessjournal.com/news/government-and-politics/8053-nunes-

diplomacy-is-the-only-option-in-syria>)
* The Washington Examiner (here<http://washingtonexaminer.com/article/2535343>)
* The Weekly Standard (here<http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/lack-confidence-obama-explains-gop-

opposition-syria_752906.html?page=1>)
For other stories this weekend, take a look at the Nunes Digest on my website here<http://nunes.house.gov/>.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
As President Obama encourages Congress to authorize the use of force in Syria, I am working on a
bipartisan effort in the House and Senate to oppose the President’s request. I believe that non-military
options have not yet been exhausted, and that the President has not clearly explained to Congress the
political goals and military objectives of his plan of action, nor his strategy to deal with the possible
consequences of a military strike. You can read more about my position in articles at:
• The Fresno Bee (here)
• The Business Journal (here)
• The Washington Examiner (here)
• The Weekly Standard (here)
For other stories this weekend, take a look at the Nunes Digest on my website here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
To: 'Devin Nunes'
Subject: Join Congressman Nunes October 5th - Complimentary
Date: 13-Sep-2013 16:09
Join Congressman Nunes Oct 5 Complimentary.pdf [Save] [Open]
Message Id: 523338A2.VIS.PO18.200.2000065.1.DE2.1
You are Invited to a Fundraising Reception in Honor of
Congressman Devin Nunes (R-CA)

and House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
"The 40th Birthday Celebration & 40 Year Old Port Tasting"
Saturday
October 5, 2013
5:30-7:30 P.M.
At the Home of
Visalia, CA 93291
Located in "The Lakes"
Enter at the gate care of the "Puryear Event."
Park along W. Prospect Dr.
-COMPLIMENTARY-
Please RSVP by October 1st on the attached form or by email to

<mailto:Nicky@DevinNunes.net> Nicky@DevinNunes.net.
Paid for and Authorized by the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee.
election cycle.
Contributions by corporations, labor unions, federal contractors, and
foreign nationals are prohibited. Individuals may contribute up to $2,600
per election (primary and general) for a total of $5,200. Federal
multi-candidate PAC's may contribute up to $5,000 per election (primary and
general) for a total of $10,000.
Sincerely,
Nicky
___________________________________________________
Nicky Henderson

FEC# C00370056
PO Box 6545
Visalia, CA 93290
Cell 559.250.8775
Office 559.739.8903
Fax 559.739.8994
EFax 888.412.3824
<http://www.devinnunes.net/> www.DevinNunes.net
<mailto:Nicky@DevinNunes.net> Nicky@DevinNunes.net

TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT

“The 40th Birthday Celebration & 40 Year Old Port Tasting”
Saturday
October 5, 2013
5:30-7:30 P.M.
At the Home of

Visalia, CA 93291
Located in “The Lakes”
Enter at the gate care of the “Puryear Event.”
-COMPLIMENTARY-
Please RSVP by October 1st on the attached form or by email to Nicky@DevinNunes.net.
Paid for and Authorized by the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee.
Contributions to the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee are not tax deductible for federal
income tax purposes. Federal law requires us to use our best efforts to collect and report
the name, mailing address, occupation and name of employer of each individual whose
contributions exceed $200 in an election cycle.
Contributions by corporations, labor unions, federal contractors, and foreign nationals are
prohibited. Individuals may contribute up to $2,600 per election (primary and general) for a
total of $5,200. Federal multi-candidate PAC’s may contribute up to $5,000 per election
(primary and general) for a total of $10,000.
Sincerely,
Nicky
___________________________________________________
Nicky Henderson
FEC# C00370056
PO Box 6545
Visalia, CA 93290
Cell 559.250.8775
Office 559.739.8903
Fax 559.739.8994
EFax 888.412.3824
www.DevinNunes.net
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient
(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information or otherwise be protected by law. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail
MAIL
Subject: For your weekend reading
Date: 27-Sep-2013 15:06
Message Id: 52459EF8.VIS.PO18.200.2000094.1.A87.1
Dear Friends,
Your weekend reading is ready at the Nunes Digest here<http://nunes.house.gov/>.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Your weekend reading is ready at the Nunes Digest here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: POSTPONED - Oct 5 with Congressman Nunes
Date: 02-Oct-2013 11:17
Message Id: 524C00C9.VIS.PO18.200.20000AA.1.A8B.1
Greetings,
Congressman Nunes has decided to postpone this event as a resolution may not
be reached by Friday regarding the government shut down. We regret any
inconveniences this may cause and will let everyone know the new date as
soon as possible.
Thank you,
Nicky

"The 40th Birthday Celebration & 40 Year Old Port Tasting"
Saturday
October 5, 2013
5:30-7:30 P.M.
At the Home of

Visalia, CA 93291
Located in "The Lakes"

Enter at the gate care of the "Puryear Event."
Leadership Levels:
$2600 Platinum
$1500 Gold
$1000 Silver
Or $250 Per Couple
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Greetings,
Congressman Nunes has decided to postpone this event as a resolution may not be reached by Friday
regarding the government shut down. We regret any inconveniences this may cause and will let everyone
know the new date as soon as possible.
Thank you,
Nicky
Congressman Devin Nunes(R-CA)

“The 40th Birthday Celebration & 40 Year Old Port Tasting”
Saturday
October 5, 2013
5:30-7:30 P.M.
At the Home of

Visalia, CA 93291
Located in “The Lakes”

Enter at the gate care of the “Puryear Event.”
Leadership Levels:
$2600 Platinum $1000 Silver

$1500 Gold Or $250 Per Couple
MAIL
Subject: The shutdown continues
Date: 09-Oct-2013 10:02
Message Id: 525529C4.VIS.PO18.200.200006D.1.B4C.1
Dear Friends,
The government shutdown has entered its second week. As you may know, I have fought hard to repeal ObamaCare,
which I believe is disastrous for the American economy and for our healthcare system. However, I am critical of the
strategy that brought us to this point – I have long believed that this strategy would result in a shutdown but would not
achieve its goal of dismantling ObamaCare.
With that in mind, I wanted to share a few links related to the current situation:
· John Batchelor and I discuss the shutdown here<http://nunes.house.gov/UploadedFiles/Nunes_on_JBS.mp3>.
· John Batchelor discusses the ObamaCare rollout and the shutdown with Victor Davis Hanson and Larry Kudlow
here<http://nunes.house.gov/UploadedFiles/redo2.mp3>.
· National Review interviews me on the shutdown here<http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/360566/devin-nunes-

provocateur-robert-costa>.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
The government shutdown has entered its second week. As you may know, I have fought hard to repeal
ObamaCare, which I believe is disastrous for the American economy and for our healthcare system.
However, I am critical of the strategy that brought us to this point – I have long believed that this strategy
would result in a shutdown but would not achieve its goal of dismantling ObamaCare.
With that in mind, I wanted to share a few links related to the current situation:
• John Batchelor and I discuss the shutdown here.
• John Batchelor discusses the ObamaCare rollout and the shutdown with Victor Davis Hanson and Larry
Kudlow here.
• National Review interviews me on the shutdown here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: Honor Flight vets touch down in DC
Date: 30-Oct-2013 08:45
Message Id: 5270C714.VIS.PO18.200.20000A3.1.FD2.1
Dear Friends,
Along with other Valley congressmen, I had the honor this morning of meeting with local veterans of World War II who
came to Washington, D.C. with the Honor Flight program. They are amazing people who sacrificed a lot for their country.
Thank you all for your service.
[cid:image003.jpg@01CED562.7B7109C0] [cid:image004.jpg@01CED562.7B7109C0]
[cid:image005.jpg@01CED564.EC08D210]
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Along with other Valley congressmen, I had the honor this morning of meeting with local veterans of World
War II who came to Washington, D.C. with the Honor Flight program. They are amazing people who
sacrificed a lot for their country. Thank you all for your service.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
message. You can also opt out of all electronic communications by visiting www.nunes.house.gov and following the instructions.
MAIL
Subject: Interview on Benghazi with KMJ’s Chris Daniel at 3:00 PST
Date: 07-Nov-2013 10:23
Message Id: 527B6A14.VIS.PO18.200.200009A.1.35A0.1
Dear Friends,
I’ll be speaking with KMJ’s Chris Daniel today at 3:00 pm PST about a letter I sent to Speaker Boehner regarding the
investigation into the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. You can listen to the Chris Daniel show
here<http://www.kmjnow.com/pages/listenliveplayer580am>, and you can read the letter
here<http://nunes.house.gov/UploadedFiles/Rep._Nunes_letter_to_Speaker_Boehner.pdf>. For more information, see:
· CNN article and video here<http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/06/politics/benghazi-cia-

hearing/index.html?iref=allsearch>.
· Fox News Special Report video here<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXOndjb3P-

E&list=UUtbArL6CmOfFqgmpuRjLp3w>, and a Special Report panel discussion (beginning at the 22:40 mark)
here<http://video.foxnews.com/v/2813376875001/special-report-online-11613/?playlist_id=930909819001>.
· Daily Beast article by Eli Lake here<http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/11/06/cia-contractor-testimony-

could-undermine-obama-on-benghazi.html>.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I’ll be speaking with KMJ’s Chris Daniel today at 3:00 pm PST about a letter I sent to Speaker Boehner
regarding the investigation into the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. You can listen to the Chris
Daniel show here, and you can read the letter here. For more information, see:
• CNN article and video here.
• Fox News Special Report video here, and a Special Report panel discussion (beginning at the 22:40 mark)
here.
• Daily Beast article by Eli Lake here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: There is no fixing ObamaCare
Date: 15-Nov-2013 10:47
Message Id: 5285FBB8.VIS.PO18.200.2000094.1.BE7.1
Dear Friends,
Yesterday President Obama announced yet another major change to ObamaCare, allowing insurance companies to
reinstate policies that ObamaCare itself forced them to cancel. This adds to a fast-growing list of ObamaCare "fixes" that
were unilaterally decreed by the Obama administration, including the delay of the employer mandate and a slew of short-
term exemptions to various ObamaCare rules that were awarded to select companies and unions.
Consider the current situation: millions of people who were told they could keep their healthcare plans have had those
plans cancelled; millions more are unable to sign up for new plans on the malfunctioning website of the ObamaCare
exchanges even though they will soon be fined if they don't somehow get a plan; those who do manage to access the
exchanges are realizing they must get coverage for unnecessary services such as maternity care for men; and
businesses have downgraded workers from full-time to part-time status in order to avoid ObamaCare mandates.
My friends, this is no way to run a government. The president cannot purport to remake one-sixth of the U.S. economy,
throw people off their healthcare plans, drown businesses in a sea of impossible regulations, and then assume the
authority to enforce, not enforce, or change the law at will. This does grievous harm to individual Americans, to the
healthcare system, and to our tradition of governance based on the rule of law. We live in a constitutional republic, not an
autocracy where the law is whatever the monarch says it is.
The Obama administration's mania for controlling the healthcare sector has created a crisis so profound that even
convinced ObamaCare supporters in the president's own party are speaking out. But the damage cannot be repaired by
more administrative fixes. Democrats can still protect ObamaCare in Congress, but their willingness to do so is weakening
with every new ObamaCare disaster. We must continue to chip away at this overreaching, ill-conceived law until it is
repealed entirely and replaced with free-market reforms that work. For reform ideas that some colleagues and I have
proposed, see here<http://nunes.house.gov/uploadedfiles/pca_short_summary.pdf>.
Separately, I appeared on Fox News' Special Report yesterday to discuss the investigation into the attack on Benghazi.
You can watch the video here<http://video.foxnews.com/v/2839472336001/rep-nunes-there-are-definitely-discrepancies-
on-benghazi/>.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Yesterday President Obama announced yet another major change to ObamaCare, allowing insurance
companies to reinstate policies that ObamaCare itself forced them to cancel. This adds to a fast-growing list
of ObamaCare “fixes” that were unilaterally decreed by the Obama administration, including the delay of the
employer mandate and a slew of short-term exemptions to various ObamaCare rules that were awarded to
select companies and unions.
Consider the current situation: millions of people who were told they could keep their healthcare plans have
had those plans cancelled; millions more are unable to sign up for new plans on the malfunctioning website
of the ObamaCare exchanges even though they will soon be fined if they don’t somehow get a plan; those
who do manage to access the exchanges are realizing they must get coverage for unnecessary services such
as maternity care for men; and businesses have downgraded workers from full-time to part-time status in
order to avoid ObamaCare mandates.
My friends, this is no way to run a government. The president cannot purport to remake one-sixth of the U.S.
economy, throw people off their healthcare plans, drown businesses in a sea of impossible regulations, and
then assume the authority to enforce, not enforce, or change the law at will. This does grievous harm to
individual Americans, to the healthcare system, and to our tradition of governance based on the rule of law.
We live in a constitutional republic, not an autocracy where the law is whatever the monarch says it is.
The Obama administration’s mania for controlling the healthcare sector has created a crisis so profound that
even convinced ObamaCare supporters in the president’s own party are speaking out. But the damage cannot
be repaired by more administrative fixes. Democrats can still protect ObamaCare in Congress, but their
willingness to do so is weakening with every new ObamaCare disaster. We must continue to chip away at
this overreaching, ill-conceived law until it is repealed entirely and replaced with free-market reforms that
work. For reform ideas that some colleagues and I have proposed, see here.
Separately, I appeared on Fox News’ Special Report yesterday to discuss the investigation into the attack on
Benghazi. You can watch the video here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: Declassification review sought for bin Laden documents
Date: 22-Nov-2013 15:43
Message Id: 528F7B88.VIS.PO18.200.200001C.1.1486.1
Dear Friends,
In a bill approved by the House Intelligence Committee to fund intelligence activities and national security programs, I
inserted language seeking a declassification review of documents obtained during the raid on Osama bin Laden's
compound in Pakistan. I believe these documents could help us to better understand al Qaeda and related threats to our
national security. You can read about the bill here<http://intelligence.house.gov/press-release/house-intelligence-
committee-completes-markup-fy14-intelligence-authorization-bill>.
Separately, the Nunes Digest is updated for your weekend reading here<http://nunes.house.gov/>.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
In a bill approved by the House Intelligence Committee to fund intelligence activities and national security
programs, I inserted language seeking a declassification review of documents obtained during the raid on
Osama bin Laden’s compound in Pakistan. I believe these documents could help us to better understand al
Qaeda and related threats to our national security. You can read about the bill here.
Separately, the Nunes Digest is updated for your weekend reading here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
Subject: Drought is declared: Governor states the obvious while politicians run victory laps
Date: 17-Jan-2014 16:31
Message Id: 52D95AF6.VIS.PO18.200.20000C5.1.E51.1
Dear Friends,
Governor Jerry Brown today declared<http://gov.ca.gov/home.php> a drought emergency in California. Notably, in their
statements about the declaration, neither the governor nor Senator Dianne
Feinstein<http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=738cb818-6441-4efa-a272-8dfe57d35e59>
mentioned any of our attempts in the House of Representatives over the past several years to pass legislation that would
permanently end the state's water crisis. The Senate has rejected all our efforts, including the comprehensive fix
contained in H.R. 1837<http://nunes.house.gov/legislation/water.htm>, which passed the House in 2012 but was not acted
upon in the Senate. This week, senators declined another water fix that was proposed in connection with the omnibus
spending bill.
The governor's emergency declaration has sparked victory laps by politicians, plenty of slaps on the back, calls for water
bonds, demands to appoint a "federal drought coordinator," and cries of joy from water districts that refuse to tell farmers
and farmworkers what it will really take to end the water crisis. The bottom line is this: the declaration of a drought
emergency will accomplish next to nothing. Outside of flood-level rainfall, there are only two ways to get more water this
year: get the pumps turned back on, and get more water from the San Joaquin River that will otherwise be flushed into the
ocean for the sake of phantom salmon. It will take federal laws, like those passed in the House and rejected in the Senate,
to accomplish those actions. Anything else is just noise.
Perplexed by Senator Feinstein's refusal to cooperate on water legislation, I joined my colleagues Reps. McCarthy and
Valadao in writing a letter today inviting the senator to meet with us and explain any legislative proposals she may have to
resolve the drought. You can read the letter here<http://nunes.house.gov/uploadedfiles/final_feinstein_letter.pdf>.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Governor Jerry Brown today declared a drought emergency in California. Notably, in their statements about
the declaration, neither the governor nor Senator Dianne Feinstein mentioned any of our attempts in the
House of Representatives over the past several years to pass legislation that would permanently end the state’
s water crisis. The Senate has rejected all our efforts, including the comprehensive fix contained in H.R. 1837
, which passed the House in 2012 but was not acted upon in the Senate. This week, senators declined another
water fix that was proposed in connection with the omnibus spending bill.
The governor’s emergency declaration has sparked victory laps by politicians, plenty of slaps on the back,
calls for water bonds, demands to appoint a “federal drought coordinator,” and cries of joy from water
districts that refuse to tell farmers and farmworkers what it will really take to end the water crisis. The
bottom line is this: the declaration of a drought emergency will accomplish next to nothing. Outside of flood-
level rainfall, there are only two ways to get more water this year: get the pumps turned back on, and get
more water from the San Joaquin River that will otherwise be flushed into the ocean for the sake of phantom
salmon. It will take federal laws, like those passed in the House and rejected in the Senate, to accomplish
those actions. Anything else is just noise.
Perplexed by Senator Feinstein’s refusal to cooperate on water legislation, I joined my colleagues Reps.
McCarthy and Valadao in writing a letter today inviting the senator to meet with us and explain any
legislative proposals she may have to resolve the drought. You can read the letter here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
To: Pete Vander Poel, reply_biegoi_gmaafiv@cp20.com
Subject: Join The Fight For Water
Date: 20-Feb-2014 08:21
Message Id: 5305BB1A.VIS.PO18.200.2000020.1.EA3.1
Dear Friends,
As you may know, President Obama briefly visited the Central Valley last week. He promised to spread all kinds of
money around to our communities. What he did not promise was any meaningful action to restore our water supply. When
we asked him for “water,” he apparently thought we said “welfare.”
I would like to share with you my water message. Please view it at www.DevinNunes.com.
(http://trk.cp20.com/Tracking/t.c?6ctkw-c1iud-ketedw0&_v=2)
Without question we are in the midst of a drought. But, federal regulations are making matters much much worse. Even
today, water is being lost out to the ocean because of these regulations.
I’m asking for your support to help me fight the big-government and environmental extremism imposed on the Valley by
Hollywood barons and San Francisco-style politicians. As always, their fight is aided by deep-pocketed allies: taxpayer-
funded public employee unions that pour millions of dollars into the Valley to target Republicans, and environmental
extremists who are waging war against our water supply.
Fighting their agenda takes time and money. I am asking you to make a donation of any amount and help me keep this
ad on the air and continue this fight. If you would like to support my efforts please go here: www.DevinNunes.net/JoinMe
(http://trk.cp20.com/Tracking/t.c?6ctkw-c1iue-ketedw1&_v=2)
If you are unable to make a financial contribution please consider joining my team and help me bring about the reforms
we need. www.DevinNunes.net/JoinTheTeam (http://trk.cp20.com/Tracking/t.c?6ctkw-c1iuf-ketedw2&_v=2) You can also
sign up for text alerts from the "Nunes Network" and be the first to know. Just dial #250 from your cell phone and at the
prompt say the keyword "Devin Nunes."
Thank you for your consideration. Let's work together to keep this momentum going strong.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
Member of Congress (CA-22)
P.S. Despite the challenges we face, I am committed to fighting for progress and reform. I cannot fight this battle alone.
Please consider offering whatever support you are able to provide. We must keep the pressure on.

Contributions to the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes. Federal
law requires us to use our best efforts to collect and report the name, mailing address, occupation and name of employer
of each individual whose contributions exceed $200 in an election cycle.
Contributions by corporations, labor unions, federal contractors, and foreign nationals are prohibited.
Individuals may contribute up to $2,600 per election (primary and general) for a total of $5,200 per election cycle.
Federal multi-candidate PAC’s may contribute up to $5,000 per election (primary and general) for a total of $10,000.
FEC# C0037056
This email is intended for pvanderpoel@co.tulare.ca.us. To unsubscribe visit

http://trk.cp20.com/Tracking/t.fo?6ctkw--fdvq-ketedw8&sl=3b&t=5&_v=2
Update your subscription preferences visit
http://trk.cp20.com/Tracking/t.fo?6ctkw--fdvq-ketedw8&sl=3b&t=1&_v=2
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
As you may know, President Obama briefly visited the Central Valley last week. He promised to spread all
kinds of money around to our communities. What he did not promise was any meaningful action to restore
our water supply. When we asked him for “water,” he apparently thought we said “welfare.”
I would like to share with you my water message. Please view it at www.DevinNunes.com.
Without question we are in the midst of a drought. But, federal regulations are making matters much much
worse. Even today, water is being lost out to the ocean because of these regulations.
I’m asking for your support to help me fight the big-government and environmental extremism imposed on
the Valley by Hollywood barons and San Francisco-style politicians. As always, their fight is aided by deep-
pocketed allies: taxpayer-funded public employee unions that pour millions of dollars into the Valley to
target Republicans, and environmental extremists who are waging war against our water supply.
Fighting their agenda takes time and money. I am asking you to make a donation of any amount and help me
keep this ad on the air and continue this fight. If you would like to support my efforts please go here:
www.DevinNunes.net/JoinMe
If you are unable to make a financial contribution please consider joining my team and help me bring about
the reforms we need. www.DevinNunes.net/JoinTheTeam You can also sign up for text alerts from the
"Nunes Network" and be the first to know. Just dial #250 from your cell phone and at the prompt say the
keyword "Devin Nunes."
Thank you for your consideration. Let's work together to keep this momentum going strong.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
P.S. Despite the challenges we face, I am committed to fighting for progress and reform. I cannot fight
this battle alone. Please consider offering whatever support you are able to provide. We must keep
the pressure on.
Contributions to the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes.
Federal law requires us to use our best efforts to collect and report the name, mailing address, occupation and
name of employer of each individual whose contributions exceed $200 in an election cycle.
Contributions by corporations, labor unions, federal contractors, and foreign nationals are prohibited.
Individuals may contribute up to $2,600 per election (primary and general) for a total of $5,200 per election cycle.
Federal multi-candidate PAC’s may contribute up to $5,000 per election (primary and general) for a total of
$10,000. FEC# C0037056
This email is intended for pvanderpoel@co.tulare.ca.us.

Update your preferences or Unsubscribe
MAIL
From: memberservices@tcmls.org
To: Steven Worthley
Subject: TCAOR Event with Congressman Devin Nunes
Date: 03-Mar-2014 16:55
Message Id: 5314B406.VIS.PO18.200.200002E.1.131B.1
Hello Mr. Worthley,
We would like to extend an invitation for you to attend an event we will be having on Tuesday, March 18, 2014...
REALTOR(r) Action Fund Event

with special guest, Congressman Devin Nunes
Tuesday, March 18, 2014
Visalia Country Club
6:00 PM to 8:00 PM
This is a time for our members who have contributed the "True Cost of Doing Business" $148 or higher to mingle and
meet local officials.
We would love to have you to attend as our guest, if you are available.
Thank you for your time and have a great day!
Marina Rojas
Marketing & Communications
Tulare County Association of REALTORS(r)
Office: 559.627.1776 Fax: 559.627.9441
Website: www.tcmls.org<http://www.tcmls.org/>
[PRS_TCRealtorLogo_final]
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
This email communication contains CONFIDENTIAL information. This email is solely for the use of the intended
recipients. Disclosure to any other person is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please reply to this
message (to the sender) and delete the message from your computer. Thank you
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Hello Mr. Worthley,
We would like to extend an invitation for you to attend an event we will be having on Tuesday, March 18,
2014…
REALTOR® Action Fund Event

6:00 PM to 8:00 PM
This is a time for our members who have contributed the “True Cost of Doing Business” $148 or higher to
mingle and meet local officials.
Marina Rojas
Tulare County Association of REALTORS®

Office: 559.627.1776 Fax: 559.627.9441
Website: www.tcmls.org

This email communication contains CONFIDENTIAL information. This email is solely for the use of the intended recipients. Disclosure to any other person is
prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please reply to this message (to the sender) and delete the message from your computer. Thank you
MAIL
To: Phillip Cox
Subject: TCAOR Event with Congressman Devin Nunes
Date: 03-Mar-2014 16:54
Message Id: 5314B3CA.VIS.PO18.200.20000F7.1.E9A.1
Hello Mr. Cox,

6:00 PM to 8:00 PM
Marina Rojas
Office: 559.627.1776 Fax: 559.627.9441
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Hello Mr. Cox,
We would like to extend an invitation for you to attend an event we will be having on Tuesday, March 18,
2014…
REALTOR® Action Fund Event

6:00 PM to 8:00 PM
This is a time for our members who have contributed the “True Cost of Doing Business” $148 or higher to
mingle and meet local officials.
Marina Rojas

Office: 559.627.1776 Fax: 559.627.9441

This email communication contains CONFIDENTIAL information. This email is solely for the use of the intended recipients. Disclosure to any other person is
prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please reply to this message (to the sender) and delete the message from your computer. Thank you
MAIL
Subject: RE: TCAOR Event with Congressman Devin Nunes
Date: 04-Mar-2014 10:00
Attachments: headers.822 [Save] [Open]
Message Id: 5315A43C.VIS.PO18.200.20000B0.1.133B.1
Thanks for the response Pete and congratulations! :) We will see you then! Have a great day!
Marina Rojas
Office: 559.627.1776 Fax: 559.627.9441
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

From: Pete Vander Poel [mailto:pvanderpoel@co.tulare.ca.us]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 5:54 PM
To: Marina Rojas
Subject: Re: TCAOR Event with Congressman Devin Nunes
Hi Marina!
Hope you are doing well! Thank you for the invitation to this event. I would love to be there! I have the event on my
calendar, but, I do have to mention that my wife is due with our first child in late March, so my schedule is a bit out of my
control. I am currently planning on attending, however. Hope you have a great night!
Pete
>>> Marina Rojas <memberservices@tcmls.org> 03/03/14 4:53 PM >>>

Hello Mr. Vander Poel,

with special guest, Congressman Devin Nunes Tuesday, March 18, 2014 Visalia Country Club
6:00 PM to 8:00 PM
Marina Rojas
Office: 559.627.1776 Fax: 559.627.9441
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail This email communication contains CONFIDENTIAL
information. This email is solely for the use of the intended recipients. Disclosure to any other person is prohibited. If you
have received this email by mistake, please reply to this message (to the sender) and delete the message from your
computer. Thank you
MAIL
To: reply_bimlgb_gmaafio@cp20.com, Phillip Cox
Subject: Water Rally March 19th at 9 AM
Date: 11-Mar-2014 13:41
Message Id: 531F1294.VIS.PO18.200.2000071.1.10C5.1
We Must Keep Fighting For Our Water
Dear Friends,
The House of Representatives has passed legislation to solve the California water crisis, yet the Senate has failed
to act.
I need your help to pressure the Senate into taking action to resolve this man-made crisis.
Members of Congress from across the country are coming to Fresno next week to hold a Congressional Field
Hearing on the water crisis. Just before the hearing, please join me on the steps of Fresno City Hall at 9:00 a.m. on
Wednesday, March 19th, for a water rally.
Bring everyone you can gather so we can show the visiting Members, our Senators, other legislators, and the
entire nation how serious this crisis is.
I am also running radio and TV ads urging action to bring more water to the Central Valley. Click to listen to my
radio message and (http://trk.cp20.com/Tracking/t.c?6exw1-caj3z-ketedp3&_v=2)
If you think these ads are powerful and effective, please click
If you are unable to make a financial contribution, consider joining my team to help me bring about the reforms we
need. See how by clicking
You can get regular updates on this battle by signing up for text alerts from the "Nunes Network." Just dial #250
from your cell phone and at the prompt say the keyword "Devin Nunes."
Thank you for your consideration. Let's work together to keep our momentum going strong.
Devin Nunes
WATER RALLY
Wednesday
March 19
9 a.m.
The Steps of Fresno City Hall
2600 Fresno St.
Fresno, CA 93721
Forward to a ?
Contributions to the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes. Federal
law requires us to use our best efforts to collect and report the name, mailing address, occupation and name of employer
of each individual whose contributions exceed $200 in an election cycle. Contributions by corporations, labor unions,
federal contractors, and foreign nationals are prohibited. Individuals may contribute up to $2,600 per lection (primary and
general) for a total of $5,000. Federal multi-candidate PAC’s may contribute up to $5,000 per election (primary and
general) for a total of $10,000. FEC# C0037056
PO Box 6545 - Visalia, CA 93290
You are subscribed to this mailing list as pcox@co.tulare.ca.us. Please use the link below to modify your message
http://trk.cp20.com/Tracking/t.fo?6exw1--fdvq-ketedp6&sl=u&t=5&_v=2
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
We Must Keep Fighting For Our Water
WATER RALLY
Wednesday
March 19
9 a.m.
The Steps of
Fresno City Hall
2600 Fresno St.
Dear Friends, Fresno, CA 93721
The House of Representatives has passed legislation to solve the

California water crisis, yet the Senate has failed to act.
Forward to a Friend
I need your help to pressure the Senate into taking action to resolve
this man-made crisis.
Members of Congress from across the country are coming to Fresno

next week to hold a Congressional Field Hearing on the water crisis.
Just before the hearing, please join me on the steps of Fresno City
Hall at 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, March 19th, for a water rally.
Bring everyone you can gather so we can show the visiting Members,
our Senators, other legislators, and the entire nation how serious this
crisis is.
I am also running radio and TV ads urging action to bring more water
to the Central Valley. Click here to listen to my radio message and
here to see my TV ad. I need your help to broadcast these messages far and wide.
If you think these ads are powerful and effective, please click here and make a donation of
any amount to help keep them on the air.
If you are unable to make a financial contribution, consider joining my team to help me bring
about the reforms we need. See how by clicking here.
You can get regular updates on this battle by signing up for text alerts from the "Nunes
Network." Just dial #250 from your cell phone and at the prompt say the keyword "Devin
Nunes."
Thank you for your consideration. Let's work together to keep our momentum going strong.
Devin Nunes
Contributions to the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes. Federal law
requires us to use our best efforts to collect and report the name, mailing address, occupation and name of employer of each
individual whose contributions exceed $200 in an election cycle. Contributions by corporations, labor unions, federal
contractors, and foreign nationals are prohibited. Individuals may contribute up to $2,600 per lection (primary and general)
for a total of $5,000. Federal multi-candidate PAC’s may contribute up to $5,000 per election (primary and general) for a
total of $10,000. FEC# C0037056
PO Box 6545 - Visalia, CA 93290
You are subscribed to this mailing list as pcox@co.tulare.ca.us. Please click here to modify your message
MAIL
Subject: San Joaquin Valley tells DC: “We need water!”
Date: 21-Mar-2014 16:21
Message Id: 532C6717.VIS.PO18.200.20000B3.1.125F.1
Dear Friends,
I’d like to thank the several thousand Central Valley residents who joined me and other Members of Congress on
Wednesday for a water rally in Fresno. It was a great, energized crowd, and it sent a loud and clear message to the
Senate, the Governor, the President, and the nation that we can’t wait any longer for action on the water crisis. Afterward,
the House Natural Resources Committee held a field hearing on the crisis before a standing-room only audience.
You can read my opening remarks from the hearing

here<http://naturalresources.house.gov/uploadedfiles/openingnunes3_14_13.pdf>, and listen to Ray Appleton, John
Batchelor, and I discuss the day’s events here<http://johnbatchelorshow.com/podcasts/2014/03/20/first-hour>.
Additionally, you can watch a Fox News report on the rally and hearing by clicking on the picture below:
[cid:image001.png@01CF452D.AE5ED890]<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Hcgr_gbQLU&feature=youtu.be>
Separately, the Nunes Digest is updated for your weekend reading here<http://nunes.house.gov/>.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I’d like to thank the several thousand Central Valley residents who joined me and other Members of
Congress on Wednesday for a water rally in Fresno. It was a great, energized crowd, and it sent a loud and
clear message to the Senate, the Governor, the President, and the nation that we can’t wait any longer for
action on the water crisis. Afterward, the House Natural Resources Committee held a field hearing on the
crisis before a standing-room only audience.
You can read my opening remarks from the hearing here, and listen to Ray Appleton, John Batchelor, and I
discuss the day’s events here. Additionally, you can watch a Fox News report on the rally and hearing by
clicking on the picture below:
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
MAIL
To: reply_bjjyjl_gmaafio@cp20.com, Phillip Cox
Subject: COMPLIMENTARY - Join Hosts Karen and Richard Spencer for a Reception in Honor of Congressman Devin Nunes
Date: 12-May-2014 17:50
Message Id: 537109D5.VIS.PO18.200.2000086.1.1014.1
You are Invited to a Fundraising Reception Hosted by
Karen and Richard Spencer
in Honor of

With Special Guest

Congressman Rob Bishop
Tuesday
May 27, 2014
4:30-6:30 P.M. Event Location:
5286 E. Home Ave
Fresno, CA 93727
Leadership Levels:
$2600 Platinum
$1500 Gold
$1000 Silver
Or $250 Per Couple
Please RSVP by May 23rd by email to Nicky@DevinNunes.net or call (559) 739-8903.

Contributions to the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes.
Federal law requires us to use our best efforts to collect and report the name, mailing address, occupation and name of
employer of each individual whose contributions exceed $200 in an election cycle. Contributions by corporations, labor
unions, federal contractors, and foreign nationals are prohibited. Individuals may contribute up to $2,600 per election
(primary and general) for a total of $5,200. Federal multi-candidate PAC’s may contribute up to $5,000 per election
(primary and general) for a total of $10,000. FEC# C0037056
This email is intended for pcox@co.tulare.ca.us. To unsubscribe visit

http://trk.cp20.com/Tracking/t.fo?6llya--fdvq-ketedp1&sl=u&t=5&_v=2
Update your subscription preferences visit
http://trk.cp20.com/Tracking/t.fo?6llya--fdvq-ketedp1&sl=u&t=1&_v=2
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
You are Invited to a Fundraising Reception Hosted by
Karen and Richard Spencer
in Honor of

With Special Guest

Congressman Rob Bishop
Tuesday
May 27, 2014
4:30-6:30 P.M.
Event Location:
5286 E. Home Ave
Fresno, CA 93727
COMPLIMENTARY
Please RSVP by May 23rd to Nicky@DevinNunes.net or (559) 739-8903.

? Paid for and Authorized by the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee
Contributions to the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes. Federal law requires us
to use our best efforts to collect and report the name, mailing address, occupation and name of employer of each individual whose
contributions exceed $200 in an election cycle. Contributions by corporations, labor unions, federal contractors, and foreign nationals
are prohibited. Individuals may contribute up to $2,600 per election (primary and general) for a total of $5,200. Federal multi-candidate
PAC’s may contribute up to $5,000 per election (primary and general) for a total of $10,000. FEC# C0037056
This email is intended for pcox@co.tulare.ca.us.

Update your preferences or Unsubscribe
MAIL
To: Rep Nunes, Mike Ennis
Subject: Salute to Central Valley Honor Flight Vets
Date: 25-Jun-2014 16:20
Message Id: 53AAF6B7.VIS.PO18.200.200006D.1.1211.1
Dear Friends,
Today I had one of my favorite events – meeting participants of the Central Valley Honor Flight program at the World War
II memorial in Washington D.C. I am always amazed by these veterans’ humility and courage. Here are a few pictures
with these patriots:
[cid:image001.jpg@01CF90AA.582C92F0]
Separately, you can read my new article on America’s battle against jihadist terrorism
here<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/23/all-is-not-well-606220898/>.
Sincerely,

Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
LISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.GOV<mailto:LISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.GOV> with the text "SIGNOFF NEWS-CA22" in the
body of the message. You can also opt out of all electronic communications by visiting
www.nunes.house.gov<http://www.nunes.house.gov> and following the instructions located under ‘E-News Sign-Up.’
[Description: Description: Description: Description: USHRepRGB]<http://nunes.house.gov/>[Description: Description:
Description: Description: youtube signature]<http://www.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>[Description: Description:
Description: Description: blogger signature]<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/>
[cid:image004.jpg@01CE0B8D.D6BBF6E0] <http://nunes.house.gov/ConstituentServices/DevinNunesApp.htm>
[wmicon] <http://waysandmeans.house.gov/>
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the NEWS-CA22 list, simply click the following link to email the request:
<a href="mailto:listserv@ls1.house.gov&SUBJECT=unsubscribe&BODY=unsubscribe+NEWS-CA22">Sign off</a>
Or manually send the following via email:
Email To: listserv@ls1.house.gov

Subject: Unsubscribe
Body of message:
unsubscribe NEWS-CA22
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Today I had one of my favorite events – meeting participants of the Central Valley Honor Flight program at
the World War II memorial in Washington D.C. I am always amazed by these veterans’ humility and
courage. Here are a few pictures with these patriots:
Separately, you can read my new article on America’s battle against jihadist terrorism here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
removed from my mailing list, please send a message to LISTSERV@LS1.HOUSE.GOVwith the text
"SIGNOFF NEWS-CA22" in the body of the message. You can also opt out of all electronic
communications by visiting www.nunes.house.gov and following the instructions located under ‘E-News
Sign-Up.’
To unsubscribe from the NEWS-CA22 list, click the following link:
https://ls1.house.gov/htbin/wa?SUBED1=NEWS-CA22&A=1
MAIL
From: Nicky@DevinNunes.net
Subject: RSVP NOW!!! Join Congressman Nunes and Speaker of the House John Boehner in Visalia - Oct 7th - COMP
Date: 29-Sep-2014 14:26
Message Id: 54296C0C.VIS.PO18.200.20000C9.1.1778.1
Greetings!
Just a reminder to RSVP now if you will be joining Speaker Boehner and
Congressman Nunes next Tuesday night. I need your RSVP and birthday as soon
as possible. Thank you, hope to see you there!
Nicky
Trouble viewing this email?

<http://secure.campaigner.com/Campaigner/Public/t.show?7990c--3q68d-gtmzmu0&
_v=2> Read it online
http://media.campaigner.com/accountsmedia/28/284895/7a4250fb22cf40faa48dcd86
e4d486b7.jpg
You are Invited to a Fundraising Reception in Support of

With Special Guest
Speaker of the House
John Boehner
Tuesday
October 7, 2014
5:30-7:30 P.M.
At the Home of
32595-G Road 132

Visalia, CA 93292
**COMPLIMENTARY**
Please RSVP by October 1st to <mailto:Nicky@DevinNunes.net>

Nicky@DevinNunes.net or (559) 739-8903.

contractors, and foreign nationals are prohibited.
Individuals may contribute up to $2,600 for the General 2014 election.
Federal multi-candidate PAC's may contribute up to $5,000 for the General
2014 election.
FEC# C0037056
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Greetings!
Just a reminder to RSVP now if you will be joining Speaker Boehner and Congressman Nunes next Tuesday night. I need your RSVP and
birthday as soon as possible. Thank you, hope to see you there!
Nicky

With Special Guest

John Boehner
Tuesday
October 7, 2014
5:30-7:30 P.M.
At the Home of

32595-G Road 132
Visalia, CA 93292
**COMPLIMENTARY**
Please RSVP by October 1st to Nicky@DevinNunes.net or (559) 739-8903.

Contributions to the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes. Federal law requires us
to use our best efforts to collect and report the name, mailing address, occupation and name of employer of each individual whose
contributions exceed $200 in an election cycle. Contributions by corporations, labor unions, federal contractors, and foreign nationals
are prohibited.
Federal multi-candidate PAC’s may contribute up to $5,000 for the General 2014 election.
FEC# C0037056
MAIL
From: pvanderpoel@co.tulare.ca.us
To: Nicky@DevinNunes.net
Subject: Re: RSVP NOW!!! Join Congressman Nunes and Speaker of the House John Boehner in Visalia - Oct 7th - COMP
Date: 30-Sep-2014 09:31
Message Id: 542A7888.VIS.PO18.200.2000080.1.FEC8.1
Hi Nicky!
Hope you are doing well! Thanks for the follow up. Ashley (6/18/1988) and I (9/22/1984) are planning on attending the
event as of now. Hope you have a great afternoon!
Pete
>>> <Nicky@DevinNunes.net> 09/29/14 2:26 PM >>>

Greetings!
Just a reminder to RSVP now if you will be joining Speaker Boehner and
Congressman Nunes next Tuesday night. I need your RSVP and birthday as soon
as possible. Thank you, hope to see you there!
Nicky
Trouble viewing this email?

<http://secure.campaigner.com/Campaigner/Public/t.show?7990c--3q68d-gtmzmu0&
_v=2> Read it online
http://media.campaigner.com/accountsmedia/28/284895/7a4250fb22cf40faa48dcd86
e4d486b7.jpg

With Special Guest

John Boehner
Tuesday
October 7, 2014
5:30-7:30 P.M.
At the Home of
32595-G Road 132

Visalia, CA 93292
**COMPLIMENTARY**
Please RSVP by October 1st to <mailto:Nicky@DevinNunes.net>

Nicky@DevinNunes.net or (559) 739-8903.

contractors, and foreign nationals are prohibited.
Federal multi-candidate PAC's may contribute up to $5,000 for the General
2014 election.
FEC# C0037056
MAIL
From: badini@alcalde-fay.com
To: Benjamin Kimball, Theodore Smalley
Subject: Nunes chosen to Chair House Intelligence Committee & Full list of recommended House Chairmen
Date: 19-Nov-2014 08:48
Message Id: 546C5969.VIS.PO18.200.200003F.1.1A11.1
[http://www.politico.com/about/uploads/POLITICOLogo_jpg.jpg]
Rep. Devin Nunes to head House Intelligence Committee
By Jake Sherman
California Rep. Devin Nunes will be the next chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.
The secretive committee oversees the vast U.S. intelligence community, and the panel has only increased in stature as
America has become embroiled in battling terrorism all over the globe.
Nunes, who was elected in 2002, replaces Michigan Rep. Mike Rogers, who is retiring. Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio)
appoints the chairman of the Intelligence and Ethics committees. He named Pennsylvania Rep. Charlie Dent as chairman
of the Ethics Committee.
"Today we face a sophisticated and determined terrorist enemy that is intent on killing more and more Americans, not to
mention innocents around the globe," Boehner said in a statement. "We also face rogue states like Iran and North Korea
that continue to thumb their noses at the United States. The world is becoming increasingly dangerous and the
Intelligence Committee is vital to our efforts to protect the American people. Over the past four years, Devin has been
instrumental in ensuring that our intelligence professionals have the resources they need to keep America safe. He has
asked the tough questions and conducted serious oversight to hold the Obama administration accountable. I look forward
to working with him as the next chairman of the Intelligence Committee."
Nunes, a close ally of Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), is also on the Ways and Means Committee. Nunes
represents the Central Valley of California.
Florida Rep. Jeff Miller and New York Rep. Pete King were also vying for the intelligence gavel.
CQ/Roll Call: Recommended House Chairmen for the 114th

The Republican Steering Committee has made its official recommendations for most House committee chairmanships in
the 114th Congress. Following are those choices; elections by the full GOP caucus will take place later in the week. Over
in the Senate, decisions on chairmen will wait until after the Dec. 6 runoff in Louisiana, which will determine the final
partisan makeup of the body.
* Leader of committee appointed directly by the speaker
Committee
Recommended
Chairman for 114th
Chairman for 113th
Agriculture
[http://www.cq.com/graphics/members/by_person_id/17363.jpg]
K. Michael Conaway, Texas
[http://www.cq.com/flatfiles/editorialFiles/temporaryItems/site_manager/images/lucas.jpg]
Frank D. Lucas, Okla.
Appropriations
[http://www.cq.com/flatfiles/editorialFiles/temporaryItems/site_manager/images/haroldrogers1.jpg]
Harold Rogers, Ky.
[http://www.cq.com/flatfiles/editorialFiles/temporaryItems/site_manager/images/haroldrogers1.jpg]
Harold Rogers, Ky.
Armed Services
Mac Thornberry, Texas
[http://www.cq.com/flatfiles/editorialFiles/temporaryItems/site_manager/images/mckeon2.jpg]
Howard "Buck" McKeon, Calif.
Budget
Tom Price, Georgia
[http://www.cq.com/flatfiles/editorialFiles/temporaryItems/site_manager/images/ryan3.jpg]
Paul D. Ryan, Wis.
Education and the

Workforce
John Kline, Minn.
John Kline, Minn.
Energy and
Commerce
[http://www.cq.com/flatfiles/editorialFiles/temporaryItems/site_manager/images/upton.jpg]
Fred Upton, Mich.
[http://www.cq.com/flatfiles/editorialFiles/temporaryItems/site_manager/images/upton.jpg]
Fred Upton, Mich.
Ethics*
Charlie Dent, Pa.
K. Michael Conaway, Texas
Financial Services
[http://www.cq.com/flatfiles/editorialFiles/temporaryItems/site_manager/images/hensarling1.jpg]
Jeb Hensarling, Texas
[http://www.cq.com/flatfiles/editorialFiles/temporaryItems/site_manager/images/hensarling1.jpg]
Jeb Hensarling, Texas
Foreign Affairs
[http://www.cq.com/flatfiles/editorialFiles/temporaryItems/site_manager/images/royce1.jpg]
Ed Royce, Calif.
[http://www.cq.com/flatfiles/editorialFiles/temporaryItems/site_manager/images/royce1.jpg]
Ed Royce, Calif.
Homeland Security
Michael McCaul, Texas
Michael McCaul, Texas
House Administration*
Candice S. Miller, Mich.
Candice S. Miller, Mich.
Intelligence*
Devin Nunes, Calif.
Mike Rogers, Mich.
Judiciary
[http://www.cq.com/flatfiles/editorialFiles/temporaryItems/site_manager/images/goodlatte1.jpg]
Robert W. Goodlatte, Va.
[http://www.cq.com/flatfiles/editorialFiles/temporaryItems/site_manager/images/smith_lamar1.jpg]
Lamar Smith, Texas
Natural Resources
Rob Bishop, Utah
Doc Hastings, Wash.
Oversight and
Government Reform
Jason Chaffetz, Utah
[http://www.cq.com/flatfiles/editorialFiles/temporaryItems/site_manager/images/issa2.jpg]
Darrell Issa, Calif.
Rules*
[http://www.cq.com/flatfiles/editorialFiles/temporaryItems/site_manager/images/sessions_pete.jpg]
Pete Sessions, Texas
[http://www.cq.com/flatfiles/editorialFiles/temporaryItems/site_manager/images/sessions_pete.jpg]
Pete Sessions, Texas
Science, Space
and Technology
Lamar Smith, Texas
Lamar Smith, Texas
Small Business
Steve Chabot, Ohio
Sam Graves, Mo.
Transportation
and Infrastructure
Bill Shuster, Pa.
Bill Shuster, Pa.
Veterans' Affairs
Jeff Miller, Fla.
Jeff Miller, Fla.
Ways and Means
[http://www.cq.com/flatfiles/editorialFiles/temporaryItems/site_manager/images/ryan3.jpg]
Paul D. Ryan, Wis.
[http://www.cq.com/flatfiles/editorialFiles/temporaryItems/site_manager/images/camp_dave1.jpg]
Dave Camp, Mich.
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Rep. Devin Nunes to head House Intelligence Committee

By Jake Sherman
California Rep. Devin Nunes will be the next chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.
The secretive committee oversees the vast U.S. intelligence community, and the panel has only increased in
stature as America has become embroiled in battling terrorism all over the globe.
Nunes, who was elected in 2002, replaces Michigan Rep. Mike Rogers, who is retiring. Speaker John
Boehner (R-Ohio) appoints the chairman of the Intelligence and Ethics committees. He named Pennsylvania
Rep. Charlie Dent as chairman of the Ethics Committee.
“Today we face a sophisticated and determined terrorist enemy that is intent on killing more and more
Americans, not to mention innocents around the globe,” Boehner said in a statement. “We also face rogue
states like Iran and North Korea that continue to thumb their noses at the United States. The world is
becoming increasingly dangerous and the Intelligence Committee is vital to our efforts to protect the
American people. Over the past four years, Devin has been instrumental in ensuring that our intelligence
professionals have the resources they need to keep America safe. He has asked the tough questions and
conducted serious oversight to hold the Obama administration accountable. I look forward to working with
him as the next chairman of the Intelligence Committee.”
Nunes, a close ally of Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), is also on the Ways and Means
Committee. Nunes represents the Central Valley of California.
Florida Rep. Jeff Miller and New York Rep. Pete King were also vying for the intelligence gavel.
CQ/Roll Call: Recommended House Chairmen for the 114th

The Republican Steering Committee has made its official recommendations for most House committee
chairmanships in the 114th Congress. Following are those choices; elections by the full GOP caucus will
take place later in the week. Over in the Senate, decisions on chairmen will wait until after the Dec. 6 runoff
in Louisiana, which will determine the final partisan makeup of the body.
* Leader of committee appointed directly by the speaker

Committee Chairman for 113th
Recommended
Chairman for 114th
Agriculture
K. Michael Conaway, Texas Frank D. Lucas, Okla.
Appropriations
Harold Rogers, Ky. Harold Rogers, Ky.
Armed Services
Mac Thornberry, Texas Howard "Buck" McKeon, Calif.
Budget
Tom Price, Georgia Paul D. Ryan, Wis.
Education and the

Workforce
John Kline, Minn. John Kline, Minn.
Energy and
Commerce
Fred Upton, Mich. Fred Upton, Mich.
Ethics*
Charlie Dent, Pa. K. Michael Conaway, Texas
Financial Services
Jeb Hensarling, Texas Jeb Hensarling, Texas
Foreign Affairs
Ed Royce, Calif. Ed Royce, Calif.
Homeland Security
Michael McCaul, Texas Michael McCaul, Texas
House Administration*
Candice S. Miller, Mich. Candice S. Miller, Mich.
Intelligence*
Devin Nunes, Calif. Mike Rogers, Mich.
Judiciary
Robert W. Goodlatte, Va. Lamar Smith, Texas
Natural Resources
Rob Bishop, Utah Doc Hastings, Wash.
Oversight and
Government Reform
Jason Chaffetz, Utah Darrell Issa, Calif.
Rules*
Pete Sessions, Texas Pete Sessions, Texas
Science, Space
and Technology
Lamar Smith, Texas Lamar Smith, Texas
Small Business
Steve Chabot, Ohio Sam Graves, Mo.
Transportation
and Infrastructure
Bill Shuster, Pa. Bill Shuster, Pa.
Veterans' Affairs
Jeff Miller, Fla. Jeff Miller, Fla.
Ways and Means
Paul D. Ryan, Wis. Dave Camp, Mich.
MAIL
To: Pete Vander Poel, Rep Nunes
Subject: What I saw in the Middle East
Date: 23-Dec-2014 14:41
Message Id: 54997F21.VIS.PO18.200.20000A0.1.17C0.1
[cid:image001.jpg@01D01EC9.C7C460E0]
Dear Friends,
I recently returned from a trip to the Middle East that included visits to the Iraqi cities of Baghdad and Erbil. There was
some good news out of Iraq recently, as Kurdish fighters – helped by U.S. airstrikes – pushed
back<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/19/world/middleeast/backed-by-us-airstrikes-kurds-regain-ground-from-
isis.html?_r=0> ISIS forces around the town of Sinjar. This advance broke ISIS’s siege of Mount Sinjar, where thousands
of civilians had fled after ISIS launched<http://www.businessinsider.com/isis-tried-to-exterminate-iraqs-yazidi-community-
2014-9> a calculated campaign of mass murder. Despite this progress, ISIS’s recent
publication<http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-30573385> of a manual approving the beating and trading of
Christian and Jewish sex slaves, alongside harrowing reports<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2871508/Four-
young-Christians-brutally-beheaded-ISIS-Iraq-refusing-convert-Islam-says-Vicar-Baghdad-Canon-Andrew-White.html> of
the widespread murder and forced conversion of Christians – including the killing of children – should remind us of the
terrible fate that will befall millions if these depraved zealots are not defeated.
Not many Americans would want to live amid this dangerous war. Yet in Iraq, I met U.S. servicemen and women who are
risking their lives to assist the battle against ISIS. I am in awe of their selfless courage. These Americans are spending
Christmas there – in a warzone far from friends and family – so that we can celebrate Christmas in safety here.
So I’d like to offer my gratitude and appreciation to military veterans as well as active duty, reserve, and national guard
servicemembers, especially those now on deployment, and wish my friends and constituents a Merry Christmas.
Sincerely,

Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
Pleases note that this account does not accept incoming messages. If you would like to send me a message, please visit
my website at www.nunes.house.gov.<http://www.nunes.house.gov.%20>
########################################################################
<a href="http://nunes.house.gov/contact/unsubscribe.htm">Unsubscribe</a>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I recently returned from a trip to the Middle East that included visits to the Iraqi cities of Baghdad and Erbil.
There was some good news out of Iraq recently, as Kurdish fighters – helped by U.S. airstrikes – pushed back
ISIS forces around the town of Sinjar. This advance broke ISIS’s siege of Mount Sinjar, where thousands of
civilians had fled after ISIS launched a calculated campaign of mass murder. Despite this progress, ISIS’s
recent publication of a manual approving the beating and trading of Christian and Jewish sex slaves,
alongside harrowing reports of the widespread murder and forced conversion of Christians – including the
killing of children – should remind us of the terrible fate that will befall millions if these depraved zealots are
not defeated.
Not many Americans would want to live amid this dangerous war. Yet in Iraq, I met U.S. servicemen and
women who are risking their lives to assist the battle against ISIS. I am in awe of their selfless courage.
These Americans are spending Christmas there – in a warzone far from friends and family – so that we can
celebrate Christmas in safety here.
So I’d like to offer my gratitude and appreciation to military veterans as well as active duty, reserve, and
national guard servicemembers, especially those now on deployment, and wish my friends and constituents a
Merry Christmas.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
Pleases note that this account does not accept incoming messages. If you would like to send me a message,
please visit my website at www.nunes.house.gov.

Unsubscribe
MAIL
To: Rep Nunes, NEWS-CA22@LS1.HOUSE.GOV
Subject: Nunes on KMJ Appleton show at 11 PST today
Date: 08-Jan-2015 10:31
Message Id: 54AE5C80.VIS.PO18.200.20000F8.1.1EF8.1
[cid:image002.jpg@01D007DC.C243FEE0]
Dear Friends,
I will be dropping by the Ray Appleton show on KMJ today at 11:00 am PST. Listen live
here<http://player.listenlive.co/28021>.
Sincerely,

Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
########################################################################
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I will be dropping by the Ray Appleton show on KMJ today at 11:00 am PST. Listen live here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
Unsubscribe
MAIL
Subject: New Congress gears up
Date: 12-Jan-2015 14:41
Message Id: 54B3DD21.VIS.PO18.200.2000070.1.19D6.1
[cid:image001.jpg@01D02E83.9F3D69E0]
Dear Friends,
I am currently working to organize the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Two articles were recently
published discussing my plans and goals as the committee’s chairman. You can read them
here<http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-01-12/meet-the-congressman-who-will-watch-our-spies> and
here<http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2015/01/09/252575/terror-attack-greets-intelligence.html>.
Separately, two articles also appeared on my tax reform proposal. You can read those
here<http://www.taxanalysts.com/www/features.nsf/Features/261EE930295650DB85257DCB003F75E3?OpenDocument
> and here<http://www.taxanalysts.com/taxcom/taxblog.nsf/Permalink/MSUN-9SPHJW?OpenDocument>.
Sincerely,

Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
########################################################################
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I am currently working to organize the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Two articles
were recently published discussing my plans and goals as the committee’s chairman. You can read them here
and here.
Separately, two articles also appeared on my tax reform proposal. You can read those here and here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

Unsubscribe
MAIL
Subject: A Brooklyn water fight?
Date: 23-Jan-2015 15:54
Message Id: 54C26EA1.VIS.PO18.200.20000E7.1.16ED.1
[cid:image009.jpg@01D03734.50295EE0]
Dear Friends,
In a meeting with reporters this week, California Senator Barbara Boxer lashed
out<http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Boxer-takes-on-GOP-leader-over-water-6030934.php> at House Majority Leader
Kevin McCarthy, who had blamed the senator for killing House-Senate negotiations on a California water bill. Pronouncing
herself a Brooklyn street-fighter, the senator accused Leader McCarthy of not consulting closely enough with her and
some of her allies.
In previous Congresses, the House approved numerous major water bills (see
here<http://www.thebusinessjournal.com/news/agriculture/1006-house-passes-san-joaquin-water-act>,
here<http://nunes.house.gov/legislation/water.htm>, and
here<http://nunes.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398256>) that the Senate refused to pass. When
the Senate finally approved a weak bill<http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/05/22/228255/senate-passes-california-
drought.html> last year, we thought a path had opened to negotiate a compromise bill that would at least ease the water
crisis to some degree. But apparently, a water solution is not about providing relief to water-starved families or struggling
farmers or devastated communities – instead, it’s all about Barbara Boxer and her demand that everyone pay her the
proper respect.
Senator Boxer also argued that any water solution was pointless that favors only one part of the state. Of course, one part
of the state – the Central Valley – is suffering much worse than other parts. For example, San Francisco, a bastion of the
environmental movement, enjoys a pristine water supply piped in from Hetch Hetchy reservoir that is not subject to the
environmental regulations that have devastated the Valley’s water resources. Nevertheless, a solution seemingly needs to
benefit everyone equally – the Central Valley and San Francisco alike – or it will not win the senator’s support.
House Republicans will continue proposing solutions to the water crisis in the new Congress, and we hope Senator Boxer,
who has opposed every one of our efforts, will realize that none of us in the House really wants a Brooklyn street fight in
California.
Sincerely,

Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
########################################################################
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
In a meeting with reporters this week, California Senator Barbara Boxer lashed out at House Majority Leader
Kevin McCarthy, who had blamed the senator for killing House-Senate negotiations on a California water
bill. Pronouncing herself a Brooklyn street-fighter, the senator accused Leader McCarthy of not consulting
closely enough with her and some of her allies.
In previous Congresses, the House approved numerous major water bills (see here, here, and here) that the
Senate refused to pass. When the Senate finally approved a weak bill last year, we thought a path had opened
to negotiate a compromise bill that would at least ease the water crisis to some degree. But apparently, a
water solution is not about providing relief to water-starved families or struggling farmers or devastated
communities – instead, it’s all about Barbara Boxer and her demand that everyone pay her the proper
respect.
Senator Boxer also argued that any water solution was pointless that favors only one part of the state. Of
course, one part of the state – the Central Valley – is suffering much worse than other parts. For example,
San Francisco, a bastion of the environmental movement, enjoys a pristine water supply piped in from Hetch
Hetchy reservoir that is not subject to the environmental regulations that have devastated the Valley’s water
resources. Nevertheless, a solution seemingly needs to benefit everyone equally – the Central Valley and San
Francisco alike – or it will not win the senator’s support.
House Republicans will continue proposing solutions to the water crisis in the new Congress, and we hope
Senator Boxer, who has opposed every one of our efforts, will realize that none of us in the House really
wants a Brooklyn street fight in California.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

Unsubscribe
MAIL
From: Nicky@DevinNunes.net
Subject: COMP INVITE - Join Congressman Nunes and Speaker of the House John Boehner March 13th
Date: 24-Feb-2015 13:59
Rep Nunes and Speaker Boehner Event COMP.PDF [Save] [Open]
Message Id: 54EC83B1.VIS.PO18.200.2000095.1.14D3.1
You are Invited to a Reception in Support of
with Special Guest
Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH8)
Friday - March 13 - 6 PM
At the Home of
Betty & Corky Anderson
1021 E. Cartmill - Tulare, CA 93274
**COMPLIMENTARY INVITE**
Please RSVP to <mailto:Nicky@DevinNunes.net> Nicky@DevinNunes.net or
559-250-8775
Paid for by the Nunes Victory Fund, a joint fundraising committee authorized
by and composed of the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee, New Pac and the NRCC.
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
with Special Guest
At the Home of
Please RSVP toNicky@DevinNunes.net or 559-250-8775

Paid for by the Nunes Victory Fund, a joint fundraising committee authorized by and composed of the Devin Nunes Campaign
Committee, New Pac and the NRCC.
MAIL
From: pvanderpoel@co.tulare.ca.us
To: N@DN
Subject: Re: COMP INVITE - Join Congressman Nunes and Speaker of the House John Boehner March 13th
Date: 24-Feb-2015 14:09
Message Id: 54EC85FC.VIS.PO18.200.2000080.1.11689.1
Hi Nicky!
Thanks for the invite. I would love to attend, however, I have committed to attend the Rotary Crab Feed at the same time
in Tulare. Hope the event goes well!
Pete
>>> "N@DN" <Nicky@DevinNunes.net> 02/24/15 1:59 PM >>>

with Special Guest
At the Home of

Please RSVP to <mailto:Nicky@DevinNunes.net> Nicky@DevinNunes.net or

559-250-8775
Paid for by the Nunes Victory Fund, a joint fundraising committee authorized
by and composed of the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee, New Pac and the NRCC.
MAIL
From: rep.nunes@mail.house.gov
To: Rep Nunes, Michael Ennis
Subject: Video: Nunes on Face the Nation
Date: 22-Jun-2015 13:28
Message Id: 55880D90.VIS.PO18.200.20000BF.1.1EDB.1
Dear Friends,
You can watch my appearance on Face the Nation yesterday by clicking on this picture:
[cid:image010.jpg@01D0AD07.ABB6BAC0]<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lw9UmmrhlF8>
Separately, if you missed it, you can read my recent essay on the California water crisis
here<http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/061215-757095-california-drought-caused-by-environmental-activists.htm>.
Sincerely,
[cid:image009.jpg@01D0AB5E.39654CC0]
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
my website at nunes.house.gov.
[cid:image003.jpg@01D089B2.6B474040]<http://nunes.house.gov/>[cid:image004.jpg@01D089B2.6B474040]<http://ww
w.youtube.com/user/RepDevinNunes>[cid:image005.jpg@01D089B2.6B474040]<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/>
[cid:image006.jpg@01D089B2.6B474040] <http://nunes.house.gov/ConstituentServices/DevinNunesApp.htm>
[cid:image007.jpg@01D089B2.6B474040] <http://intelligence.house.gov/> [cid:image008.jpg@01D089B2.6B474040]
<http://waysandmeans.house.gov/>
########################################################################
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
You can watch my appearance on Face the Nation yesterday by clicking on this picture:
Separately, if you missed it, you can read my recent essay on the California water crisis here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
please visit my website at nunes.house.gov.
Unsubscribe
MAIL
Subject: Global warming overload
Date: 17-Aug-2015 14:48
Message Id: 55D1F44F.VIS.PO18.200.200000E.1.29F6.1
[cid:image008.jpg@01D0D6BD.1C557530]
Dear Friends,
Since its inception, the Obama administration has engaged in an all-out push to adopt ever-stricter global warming
regulations. Recall that Barack Obama was the only presidential candidate - at least as far as I can remember - who took
office vowing to bankrupt<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpTIhyMa-Nw> any company in an entire American
industry that refuses to adhere to his environmental agenda.
When President Obama's attempt to impose a carbon-trading scheme on the U.S. economy proved too
extreme<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/23/us/politics/23cong.html?_r=0> even for a Democrat-controlled Congress to
approve, the President remarked that there's more than one way to skin a cat. And since then, his administration has
passed crushing global warming regulations through unilateral, administrative means. Despite the extensive list of
taxpayer subsidized green energy disasters - Solyndra, Fisker Automotive, Beacon Power, A123 Systems Inc, EnerDel, to
name a few - the administration's green policies march ever forward.
The latest salvo is the president's new "climate action
plan<http://www.usnews.com/news/business/articles/2015/08/03/who-wins-and-loses-under-obamas-stricter-power-plant-
limits>," which mandates drastic reductions in carbon emissions from power plants over the next few decades. The plan
provoked a thoughtful Wall Street Journal article<http://www.wsj.com/articles/obamas-climate-plan-and-poverty-
1439420266> discussing the administration's claim that these regulations will not result in higher electricity prices that hurt
the poor. That argument, the Journal noted, is refuted by the plan itself, which demands that states launch redistribution
schemes to lessen the regulations' impact on poor communities.
The climate plan also led to observations<http://www.nationalreview.com/article/421992/clean-power-plan-will-cost-

billions-wont-lower-temperature> that despite the massive harm it will do to the economy, it will barely have any effect at
all on global warming - the problem it ostensibly aims to address. However, the plan did have at least one immediate
effect - an array of business groups and states is vowing to sue the government<http://thehill.com/policy/energy-
environment/250628-obama-climate-fight-shifts-to-courts> to stop these punitive regulations.
To drum up support for these economically destructive policies, global warmists resort to apocalyptic rhetoric, with
President Obama claiming there is "no greater threat to our planet." As Chairman of the House Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence, I have to<http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/04/middleeast/al-qaeda-branch-yemen-united-states/>
respectfully<http://time.com/3995972/isis-rape-religion/> disagree<http://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-supreme-leader-
touts-9-point-plan-to-destroy-israel/>.
Separately, the Nunes Digest is updated here<nunes.house.gov>.
Sincerely,

Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
[cid:image010.jpg@01D03CB1.85B9AB00] <http://intelligence.house.gov/> [cid:image009.jpg@01D03CA9.6198FC60]
########################################################################
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Since its inception, the Obama administration has engaged in an all-out push to adopt ever-stricter global
warming regulations. Recall that Barack Obama was the only presidential candidate – at least as far as I can
remember – who took office vowing to bankrupt any company in an entire American industry that refuses to
adhere to his environmental agenda.
When President Obama’s attempt to impose a carbon-trading scheme on the U.S. economy proved too
extreme even for a Democrat-controlled Congress to approve, the President remarked that there’s more than
one way to skin a cat. And since then, his administration has passed crushing global warming regulations
through unilateral, administrative means. Despite the extensive list of taxpayer subsidized green energy
disasters – Solyndra, Fisker Automotive, Beacon Power, A123 Systems Inc, EnerDel, to name a few – the
administration’s green policies march ever forward.
The latest salvo is the president’s new “climate action plan,” which mandates drastic reductions in carbon
emissions from power plants over the next few decades. The plan provoked a thoughtful Wall Street Journal
article discussing the administration’s claim that these regulations will not result in higher electricity prices
that hurt the poor. That argument, the Journal noted, is refuted by the plan itself, which demands that states
launch redistribution schemes to lessen the regulations’ impact on poor communities.
The climate plan also led to observations that despite the massive harm it will do to the economy, it will
barely have any effect at all on global warming – the problem it ostensibly aims to address. However, the
plan did have at least one immediate effect – an array of business groups and states is vowing to sue the
government to stop these punitive regulations.
To drum up support for these economically destructive policies, global warmists resort to apocalyptic
rhetoric, with President Obama claiming there is “no greater threat to our planet.” As Chairman of the House
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, I have to respectfully disagree.
Separately, the Nunes Digest is updated here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

Unsubscribe
MAIL
Subject: Nunes on Appleton show 1:00 PST on KMJ
Date: 21-Aug-2015 10:05
Message Id: 55D6F7CB.VIS.PO18.200.200007B.1.42C3.1
[cid:image001.gif@01D0DC11.B7118D80]
Dear Friends,
I'll be stopping by the Ray Appleton show today at 1:00 PST. You can listen live on KMJ here<http://www.kmjnow.com/>.
Sincerely,

Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
########################################################################
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I’ll be stopping by the Ray Appleton show today at 1:00 PST. You can listen live on KMJ here.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
Unsubscribe
MAIL
To: Pete Vander Poel, Rep Nunes
Subject: Nunes office seeking interns
Date: 04-Sep-2015 13:49
Message Id: 55E9A16C.VIS.PO18.200.2000079.1.22F3.1
[cid:image001.jpg@01D0E633.7EEA0190]
Dear Friends,
Fall and spring internships are available in my Washington, D.C. and Visalia offices. If you know someone who is
interested in politics and public affairs, wants to gain professional experience, and can excel in a fast-paced environment,
Interns provide critical staff support and are often called on to work at public events, conduct research, and help with
special projects. The application process is now open for both part-time and full-time applicants.
All interns must have a high school diploma. Additionally, they must be enrolled in or have recently graduated from an
accredited college or university. Applications can be downloaded from my website
here<http://nunes.house.gov/constituentservices/internships.htm>.
For answers to questions about my intern program, please call (559) 733-3861 or (202) 225-2523.
Sincerely,

Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
########################################################################
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
Fall and spring internships are available in my Washington, D.C. and Visalia offices. If you know someone
who is interested in politics and public affairs, wants to gain professional experience, and can excel in a fast-
paced environment, please pass along this message.
Interns provide critical staff support and are often called on to work at public events, conduct research, and
help with special projects. The application process is now open for both part-time and full-time applicants.
All interns must have a high school diploma. Additionally, they must be enrolled in or have recently
graduated from an accredited college or university. Applications can be downloaded from my website here.
For answers to questions about my intern program, please call (559) 733-3861 or (202) 225-2523.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS

Unsubscribe
MAIL
Subject: Nunes on ABC's This Week
Date: 26-Sep-2015 12:35
Message Id: 5606910D.VIS.PO18.200.20000A6.1.1DC4.1
[cid:image001.jpg@01D0F86F.E409CC10]
Dear Friends,
I will be appearing tomorrow on ABC's Sunday morning news show This Week. The show airs from 9:00 am to 10:00 am
PST in most Central Valley locations. For a full list of local air times, click here<http://abcnews.go.com/thisweek#map>,
scroll to the map of the United States at the bottom of the page, and click on your state.
Sincerely,

Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
########################################################################
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Dear Friends,
I will be appearing tomorrow on ABC’s Sunday morning news show This Week. The show airs from 9:00
am to 10:00 am PST in most Central Valley locations. For a full list of local air times, click here, scroll to
the map of the United States at the bottom of the page, and click on your state.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
Unsubscribe
MAIL
To: Steven Worthley, Congressman Devin Nunes
Subject: Join Congressman Devin Nunes and Special Guest Navy SEAL Rob O'Neill for Zero Dark Thirty Movie - FREE!
Date: 23-Feb-2016 14:07
Message Id: 56CC6798.VIS.PO18.200.2000007.1.1E95.1
RSVP Now and Join
and Special Guest
Navy SEAL Rob O’Neill
for a Special Screening of Zero Dark Thirty.
VISALIA EVENT
Complimentary Tickets
to Zero Dark 30 With Navy SEAL Rob O'Neill
Friday, March 4, 2016 at 7:00 PM (PST)
Visalia Fox Theatre
308 West Main Street
Visalia, CA 93291
https://secure.campaigner.com/media/28/284895/Button_ReserveTickets.png?g=1456252842536
(http://trk.cp20.com/click?9y9ai-1bx98e-kete8u3)
Then Click the Green Register Button
*COMPLIMENTARY TICKETS TO THE FRESNO EVENT ON

MARCH 5th ARE SOLD OUT*
(http://trk.cp20.com/click?9y9ai-1bx98f-kete8u4)
Zero Dark 30 is the movie about the bin Laden raid in which O’Neill is anonymously portrayed. Movie
is FREE to everyone.
No donation necessary to attend the movie at 7 PM.
Rob O’Neill is one of the most highly-decorated combat vetera

ns of our time. He was a team leader with the Naval Special Warfare Development Group. He has deployed more than a
dozen times, and he held combat leadership roles in more than 400 combat missions in four different theaters of war. A
highly-trained Navy SEAL, he led some of the military’s most elite forces and was involved in our nation’s most important
campaigns. With most of his career shrouded in a classified cloak, O’Neill was the man on the ground we have never
heard of but know exists. He was one of the quiet professionals performing the most difficult
tasks in the most difficult circumstances, serving his remarkable career in the shadows and keeping America safe in the
process.
In his line of work, instant, critical decision-making is a necessity for success, and he has proven experience in
exceptionally high-risk and fluid environments. Having trained more than 800 special operations and tactical operators,
O’Neill brings this unique expertise to organizations and translates his elite SEAL team training into high-impact,
actionable insights on leadership, decision-making, operating in uncertain environments, and how to become the ‘best of
the best.’ His mantra is “never quit,” and O’Neill believes this is the single most important factor in determining success.
O’Neill reminds us that the servicemen doing the dirtiest work are often making the hardest sacrifices.
One of the nation’s most decorated veterans, O’Neill has been decorated more than 52 times with honors, including two
Silver Stars, four Bronze Stars with Valor, a Joint Service Commendation Medal with Valor, three Presidential Unit
citations, and two Navy/Marine Corps Commendations with Valor. Silver Stars, the military’s third highest honor, are
awarded for extraordinary gallantry in action against an enemy of the United States. Bronze Stars with Valor are awarded
for merit, with Valor signifying a heroic act and direct participation in combat operations. It is the fourth-highest combat
award of the U.S. Armed Forces and the ninth highest military award overall. Joint Service Commendation Medals are
given for senior service on a joint military staff and is the most senior of the commendation medals.
FEC# C0037056
You are subscribed to this mailing list as sworthley@co.tulare.ca.us. Please use the link below to modify your message
http://trk.cp20.com/form?9y9ai--fdvq-kete8u0&sl=u&t=5
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
RSVP Now and Join

and Special Guest
Navy SEAL Rob O’Neill

for a Special Screening of Zero Dark Thirty.
VISALIA EVENT
Complimentary Tickets
to Zero Dark 30 With Navy SEAL Rob O'Neill
Friday, March 4, 2016 at 7:00 PM (PST)
Visalia Fox Theatre
308 West Main Street
Visalia, CA 93291
Then Click the Green Register Button

*COMPLIMENTARY TICKETS TO THE FRESNO EVENT ON
MARCH 5th ARE SOLD OUT*
Zero Dark 30 is the movie about the bin Laden raid in which O’Neill is
anonymously portrayed. Movie is FREE to everyone.
No donation necessary to attend the movie at 7 PM.
Rob O’Neill is one of the most highly-decorated combat veterans of our time. He was a team leader with the Naval Special
Warfare Development Group. He has deployed more than a dozen times, and he held combat leadership roles in more than
400 combat missions in four different theaters of war. A highly-trained Navy SEAL, he led some of the military’s most elite
forces and was involved in our nation’s most important campaigns. With most of his career shrouded in a classified cloak,
O’Neill was the man on the ground we have never heard of but know exists. He was one of the quiet professionals
performing the most difficult tasks in the most difficult circumstances, serving his remarkable career in the shadows and
keeping America safe in the process.
In his line of work, instant, critical decision-making is a necessity for success, and he has proven experience in
exceptionally high-risk and fluid environments. Having trained more than 800 special operations and tactical operators, O’
Neill brings this unique expertise to organizations and translates his elite SEAL team training into high-impact, actionable
insights on leadership, decision-making, operating in uncertain environments, and how to become the ‘best of the best.’ His
mantra is “never quit,” and O’Neill believes this is the single most important factor in determining success. O’Neill reminds
us that the servicemen doing the dirtiest work are often making the hardest sacrifices.
One of the nation’s most decorated veterans, O’Neill has been decorated more than 52 times with honors, including two
Silver Stars, four Bronze Stars with Valor, a Joint Service Commendation Medal with Valor, three Presidential Unit
citations, and two Navy/Marine Corps Commendations with Valor. Silver Stars, the military’s third highest honor, are
awarded for extraordinary gallantry in action against an enemy of the United States. Bronze Stars with Valor are awarded
for merit, with Valor signifying a heroic act and direct participation in combat operations. It is the fourth-highest combat
award of the U.S. Armed Forces and the ninth highest military award overall. Joint Service Commendation Medals are
given for senior service on a joint military staff and is the most senior of the commendation medals.
FEC# C0037056
You are subscribed to this mailing list as sworthley@co.tulare.ca.us. Please click here to modify your
message preferences or to unsubscribe from any future mailings. We will respect all unsubscribe requests.
MAIL
From: ca22dn.newsletter@mail.house.gov
To: Steven Worthley
Subject: California farmers stand tall
Date: 04-Mar-2016 15:44
Message Id: 56D9AD5C.VIS.PO18.200.200003B.1.4CDE.1
Click here to open this e-mail in its own browser window

<https://iqconnect.lmhostediq.com/iqextranet/view_newsletter_setup.aspx?
link=CA22DN%2501126106%25013.4.2016%2bCalifornia%2bfarmers%2bstand%2btal
l%250114268.3060749.2418742.7010479%2501sworthley%2540co.tulare.ca.us%25
01Friend%2501Steve%2bWorthley%2501Tulare%2bCounty%2bSupervisor%252c%2bDi
strict%2b4%253cbr%253e%250d%250a2800%2bWest%2bBurrel%2bAvenue%253cbr%253
e%250d%250aVisalia%252c%2bCA%2b93291-4541%2501> Click here to
open a plain text version of this email
plain_text=Y&link=CA22DN%2501126106%25013.4.2016%2bCalifornia%2bfarmers%
2bstand%2btall%250114268.3060749.2418742.7010479%2501sworthley%2540co.tu
lare.ca.us%2501Friend%2501Steve%2bWorthley%2501Tulare%2bCounty%2bSupervi
sor%252c%2bDistrict%2b4%253cbr%253e%250d%250a2800%2bWest%2bBurrel%2bAven
ue%253cbr%253e%250d%250aVisalia%252c%2bCA%2b93291-4541%2501>
<https://iqconnect.lmhostediq.com/iqextranet/Customers/CA22DN/Banner2.pn
g>
Biography
<https://iqconnect.lmhostediq.com/iqextranet/iqClickTrk.aspx?&cid=CA22DN
&crop=14268.3060749.2418742.7010479&report_id=&redirect=http%3a%2f%2fnun
es.house.gov%2fbiography%2f> District Info
es.house.gov%2fdistrict%2f> Services
es.house.gov%2fconstituentservices%2f> Legislation
es.house.gov%2fissues%2f> News Center
es.house.gov%2fnews%2f> Contact
es.house.gov%2fcontact%2f>
<https://iqconnect.lmhostediq.com/iqextranet/Customers/CA22DN/farming_fa
mily.jpg>
Dear Friends,
Capay Valley, a rural area northwest of Sacramento, recently had a big

turnout
&crop=14268.3060749.2418742.7010479&report_id=&redirect=http%3a%2f%2fwww
sacbee.com%2fnews%2flocal%2fenvironment%2farticle63082277.html> to
celebrate its 101st annual Almond Festival. This caught my eye because
extreme environmental groups have blamed California farmers in general
and almond growers in particular for the state's water crisis. Of
course, they rely on grossly distorted
nationalreview.com%2farticle%2f416918%2fno-farmers-dont-use-80-percent-
californias-water-devin-nunes> statistics to make their case, but that
doesn't seem to bother many of the media outlets
thedailybeast.com%2farticles%2f2015%2f03%2f30%2fhow-growers-gamed-calif
ornia-s-drought.html> reporting on growers supposedly using too much
water.
Like Central Valley farmers, the people of Capay Valley are defying
their misguided critics. California farmers help feed the nation and
ask little in return except for an adequate water supply. And even
though that is no longer being provided, the state's agricultural
communities continue to take pride in what they do and how they do it.
Our state's farming families are steadfast and dependable—they have
earned our gratitude.
Separately, the Nunes Digest is updated for your weekend reading here
es.house.gov%2f> .
Sincerely,
<https://iqconnect.lmhostediq.com/iqextranet/Customers/CA22DN/NunesTrans
parentBlack.png>
Devin Nunes
Member of Congress
Pleases note that this account does not accept incoming messages. If
you would like to send me a message, please visit my website
es.house.gov%2f> .
<https://iqconnect.lmhostediq.com/iqextranet/Customers/CA22DN/nuneslinks
png>
WASHINGTON, DC
Longworth House Office Building
Suite 1013
Main: (202) 225-2523
Fax: (202) 225-3404 VISALIA
113 North Church Street
Suite 208
Visalia, CA 93291
Main: (559) 733-3861
Fax: (559) 733-3865 CLOVIS
264 Clovis Avenue
Suite 206
Clovis, CA 93612
Main: (559) 323-5235
Fax: (559) 323-5528
Unsubscribe
<https://iqconnect.lmhostediq.com/iqextranet/EsurveyForm.aspx?__cid=CA22
DN&__sid=100008&__crop=14268.3060749.2418742.7010479>
<https://iqconnect.lmhostediq.com/iqextranet/Customers/CA22DN/iqtrk.gif?
crop=14268.3060749.2418742.7010479>
crop=14268.3060749.2418742.7010479>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
Click here to open this e-mail in its own browser Click here to open a plain text version of this
window email
Biography District Info Services Legislation News Center Contact
Dear Friends,
Capay Valley, a rural area northwest of Sacramento, recently had a big turnout to celebrate
its 101st annual Almond Festival. This caught my eye because extreme environmental
groups have blamed California farmers in general and almond growers in particular for the
state's water crisis. Of course, they rely on grossly distorted statistics to make their case,
but that doesn't seem to bother many of the media outlets reporting on growers supposedly
using too much water.
Like Central Valley farmers, the people of Capay Valley are defying their misguided critics.
California farmers help feed the nation and ask little in return except for an adequate water
supply. And even though that is no longer being provided, the state's agricultural
communities continue to take pride in what they do and how they do it. Our state's farming
families are steadfast and dependablethey have earned our gratitude.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
Member of Congress
Pleases note that this account does not accept incoming messages. If you would like to send
me a message, please visit my website.
WASHINGTON, DC VISALIA CLOVIS

Longworth House Office Building 113 North Church Street 264 Clovis Avenue
Suite 1013 Suite 208 Suite 206
Washington, DC 20515 Visalia, CA 93291 Clovis, CA 93612
Main: (202) 225-2523 Main: (559) 733-3861 Main: (559) 323-5235
Fax: (202) 225-3404 Fax: (559) 733-3865 Fax: (559) 323-5528
Unsubscribe
MAIL
To: Steven Worthley
Subject: Greens strike at global warming heretics
Date: 09-May-2016 15:29
Message Id: 5730ACBC.VIS.PO18.200.20000C2.1.2625.1

link=CA22DN%2501126406%25015.6.2016%2bGreens%2bstrike%2bat%2bglobal%2bwa
rming%2bheretics%250114320.3316248.2424659.7010479%2501sworthley%2540co.
tulare.ca.us%2501Friend%2501Steve%2bWorthley%2501Tulare%2bCounty%2bSuper
visor%252c%2bDistrict%2b4%253cbr%253e%250d%250a2800%2bWest%2bBurrel%2bAv
enue%253cbr%253e%250d%250aVisalia%252c%2bCA%2b93291-4541%2501>
Click here to open a plain text version of this email
plain_text=Y&link=CA22DN%2501126406%25015.6.2016%2bGreens%2bstrike%2bat%
2bglobal%2bwarming%2bheretics%250114320.3316248.2424659.7010479%2501swor
thley%2540co.tulare.ca.us%2501Friend%2501Steve%2bWorthley%2501Tulare%2bC
ounty%2bSupervisor%252c%2bDistrict%2b4%253cbr%253e%250d%250a2800%2bWest%
2bBurrel%2bAvenue%253cbr%253e%250d%250aVisalia%252c%2bCA%2b93291-4541%25
01>
g>
Biography
es.house.gov%2fbiography%2f> District Info
es.house.gov%2fdistrict%2f> Services
es.house.gov%2fconstituentservices%2f> Legislation
es.house.gov%2fissues%2f> News Center
es.house.gov%2fnews%2f> Contact
es.house.gov%2fcontact%2f>
<https://iqconnect.lmhostediq.com/iqextranet/Customers/CA22DN/subpoena-p
aper-with-blue-pen.jpg>
Dear Friends,
A group of state attorneys general announced

nytimes.com%2f2016%2f03%2f30%2fscience%2fnew-york-climate-change-inquir
y-into-exxon-adds-prosecutors.html%3f_r%3d0> earlier this year they
would investigate ExxonMobil for fraud due to company statements that
cast doubt on the supposedly catastrophic threat posed by global
warming.
In an amazing coincidence, the officials took action shortly after a

coalition of global warming activists, including Greenpeace and the
Rockefeller Family Fund, held a fateful meeting
&crop=14320.3316248.2424659.7010479&report_id=&redirect=http%3a%2f%2ffre
ebeacon.com%2fissues%2fmemo-shows-secret-coordination-effort-exxonmobil-
climate-activists-rockefeller-fund%2f> in which they discussed plans to
launch a full-scale attack on ExxonMobil. The plans included actions to
"delegitimize" the company, provoke divestment from it, create the
public perception that the firm is a "corrupt institution," and most
notably, create "scandal" through judicial actions by attorneys general
and others that would force Exxon to divulge documents demonstrating
its climate heresies.
One would think the attorneys general would at least pretend they were
not doing the bidding of environmental extremists. But apparently they
can't even be bothered to go through the motions. As the Washington
Times recently reported, Virgin Islands Attorney General Claude Walker
has issued
washingtontimes.com%2fnews%2f2016%2fmay%2f3%2fvirgin-islands-ag-subpoen
as-exxon-communications%2f%3fpage%3d1> a subpoena targeting around 100
academic institutions and free-market think-tanks with alleged links to
ExxonMobil. In yet another fantastic coincidence, the majority of those
organizations are listed on a Greenpeace website as groups that help
ExxonMobil spread climate denial—and they are even listed on the
subpoena in almost the exact same order as they appear on the website!
The catastrophic predictions of global warming alarmists have a habit

of not coming true
&crop=14320.3316248.2424659.7010479&report_id=&redirect=http%3a%2f%2fdai
lycaller.com%2f2016%2f05%2f03%2fan-inconvenient-review-after-10-years-al
-gores-film-is-still-alarmingly-inaccurate%2f%23ixzz47h2jBizY> , but
the facts aren't important to them. They're engaging in a
scorched-earth attack on a U.S. business as part of their all-out war
on fossil fuels—the energy sources that gave rise to the modern
American economy. We've already seen what these groups are capable of
here in California, where they successfully engineered
investors.com%2fcalifornia-drought-caused-by-environmental-activists%2f
> the water crisis. It should be no surprise to see them once again
resort to the judicial system to achieve their goals.
Personally, I believe fuel and water are vital components of modern

life that help create vibrant communities, foster economic growth, and
enable food production. The extremists have a far different vision, so
I will continue exposing their agenda and opposing their excesses in
Congress.
Sincerely,
parentBlack.png>
Devin Nunes
Member of Congress
es.house.gov%2f> .
png>
WASHINGTON, DC
Suite 1013
Main: (202) 225-2523
Fax: (202) 225-3404 VISALIA
Suite 208
Visalia, CA 93291
Main: (559) 733-3861
Fax: (559) 733-3865 CLOVIS
264 Clovis Avenue
Suite 206
Clovis, CA 93612
Main: (559) 323-5235
Fax: (559) 323-5528
Unsubscribe
DN&__sid=100008&__crop=14320.3316248.2424659.7010479>
crop=14320.3316248.2424659.7010479>
crop=14320.3316248.2424659.7010479>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
window email
Dear Friends,
A group of state attorneys general announced earlier this year they would
investigate ExxonMobil for fraud due to company statements that cast doubt on
the supposedly catastrophic threat posed by global warming.
In an amazing coincidence, the officials took action shortly after a coalition of global warming
activists, including Greenpeace and the Rockefeller Family Fund, held a fateful meeting in
which they discussed plans to launch a full-scale attack on ExxonMobil. The plans
included actions to "delegitimize" the company, provoke divestment from it, create the public
perception that the firm is a "corrupt institution," and most notably, create "scandal" through
judicial actions by attorneys general and others that would force Exxon to divulge documents
demonstrating its climate heresies.
One would think the attorneys general would at least pretend they were not doing the bidding
of environmental extremists. But apparently they can't even be bothered to go through the
motions. As the Washington Times recently reported, Virgin Islands Attorney General Claude
Walker has issued a subpoena targeting around 100 academic institutions and free-market
think-tanks with alleged links to ExxonMobil. In yet another fantastic coincidence, the
majority of those organizations are listed on a Greenpeace website as groups that help
ExxonMobil spread climate denialand they are even listed on the subpoena in almost
the exact same order as they appear on the website!
The catastrophic predictions of global warming alarmists have a habit of not coming true, but
the facts aren't important to them. They're engaging in a scorched-earth attack on a U.S.
business as part of their all-out war on fossil fuelsthe energy sources that gave rise to the
modern American economy. We've already seen what these groups are capable of here in
California, where they successfully engineered the water crisis. It should be no surprise to
see them once again resort to the judicial system to achieve their goals.
Personally, I believe fuel and water are vital components of modern life that help
create vibrant communities, foster economic growth, and enable food production. The
extremists have a far different vision, so I will continue exposing their agenda and
opposing their excesses in Congress.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
Member of Congress

Main: (202) 225-2523 Main: (559) 733-3861 Main: (559) 323-5235
Fax: (202) 225-3404 Fax: (559) 733-3865 Fax: (559) 323-5528
Unsubscribe
MAIL
To: Steven Worthley
Subject: Invitation to attend my Tulare water forum
Date: 12-Aug-2016 16:06
Message Id: 57ADF3EF.VIS.PO18.200.20000A4.1.2A4A.1

link=CA22DN%2501126827%25018.12.2016%2bInvitation%2bto%2battend%2bmy%2bT
ulare%2bwater%2bforum%250114236.3689353.2435047.7010479%2501sworthley%25
40co.tulare.ca.us%2501Friend%2501Steve%2bWorthley%2501Tulare%2bCounty%2b
Supervisor%252c%2bDistrict%2b4%253cbr%253e%250d%250a2800%2bWest%2bBurrel
%2bAvenue%253cbr%253e%250d%250aVisalia%252c%2bCA%2b93291-4541%2501>
Click here to open a plain text version of this email
plain_text=Y&link=CA22DN%2501126827%25018.12.2016%2bInvitation%2bto%2bat
tend%2bmy%2bTulare%2bwater%2bforum%250114236.3689353.2435047.7010479%250
1sworthley%2540co.tulare.ca.us%2501Friend%2501Steve%2bWorthley%2501Tular
e%2bCounty%2bSupervisor%252c%2bDistrict%2b4%253cbr%253e%250d%250a2800%2b
West%2bBurrel%2bAvenue%253cbr%253e%250d%250aVisalia%252c%2bCA%2b93291-45
41%2501>
g>
Biography
es.house.gov%2fbiography%2f&redir_log=494111269872233> District Info
es.house.gov%2fdistrict%2f&redir_log=5336619524226> Services
es.house.gov%2fconstituentservices%2f&redir_log=798166015673310>
Legislation
es.house.gov%2fissues%2f&redir_log=086067428346212> News Center
es.house.gov%2fnews%2f&redir_log=324985666005196> Contact
es.house.gov%2fcontact%2f&redir_log=014907741122218>
<https://iqconnect.lmhostediq.com/iqextranet/Customers/CA22DN/Water_drop
jpg>
Dear Friends,
The 2015 Fresno County Crop Report

co.fresno.ca.us%2fWorkArea%2fDownloadAsset.aspx%3fid%3d70031&redir_log=
915275854404421> found that Fresno's crop value declined by $400
million last year. A Fresno Bee article
fresnobee.com%2fnews%2fbusiness%2fagriculture%2farticle94589022.html&re
dir_log=520983999104482> on the report quotes Fresno County
Agriculture Commissioner Les Wright as saying simply, "The lack of a
reliable water supply continues to fallow productive land." The story
also quotes West side farmer Dan Errotabere: "The water shortage with
the fallowing and cost of farming being much higher means the margins
are even tighter yet for farming."
For many Valley farmers and communities, the water crisis has reached
an emergency phase. Accordingly, I'd like to invite you to a water
forum I will be hosting on August 31 in Tulare. At this event, I will
share my thoughts on the consequences facing the Valley if the crisis
continues and outline possible solutions to this pressing problem. The
forum will be held at the Heritage Complex at 4500 S. Laspina St. from
10:00 am to 1:00 pm PST. The event is free and open to the public, but
registration is required. You can register at this link
&crop=14236.3689353.2435047.7010479&report_id=&redirect=https%3a%2f%2fww
w.eventbrite.com%2fe%2fcongressman-nunes-water-forum-tickets-26784804070
&redir_log=868684840949515> – I hope to see you there.
Sincerely,
parentBlack.png>
Devin Nunes
Member of Congress
es.house.gov%2f&redir_log=821329416116160> .
png>
WASHINGTON, DC
Suite 1013
Main: (202) 225-2523
Fax: (202) 225-3404 VISALIA
Suite 208
Visalia, CA 93291
Main: (559) 733-3861
Fax: (559) 733-3865 CLOVIS
264 Clovis Avenue
Suite 206
Clovis, CA 93612
Main: (559) 323-5235
Fax: (559) 323-5528
Unsubscribe
DN&__sid=100008&__crop=14236.3689353.2435047.7010479>
crop=14236.3689353.2435047.7010479>
crop=14236.3689353.2435047.7010479>
TEXT.htm ATTACHMENT
window email
Dear Friends,
The 2015 Fresno County Crop Report found that Fresno’s crop value declined by $400
million last year. A Fresno Bee article on the report quotes Fresno County Agriculture
Commissioner Les Wright as saying simply, “The lack of a reliable water supply continues to
fallow productive land.” The story also quotes West side farmer Dan Errotabere: “The water
shortage with the fallowing and cost of farming being much higher means the margins are
even tighter yet for farming.”
For many Valley farmers and communities, the water crisis has reached an emergency
phase. Accordingly, I’d like to invite you to a water forum I will be hosting on August 31 in
Tulare. At this event, I will share my thoughts on the consequences facing the Valley if the
crisis continues and outline possible solutions to this pressing problem. The forum will be
held at the Heritage Complex at 4500 S. Laspina St. from 10:00 am to 1:00 pm PST. The
event is free and open to the public, but registration is required. You can register at this link I
hope to see you there.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
Member of Congress

Main: (202) 225-2523 Main: (559) 733-3861 Main: (559) 323-5235
Fax: (202) 225-3404 Fax: (559) 733-3865 Fax: (559) 323-5528
Unsubscribe
Please Join Please Join
Congressman Congressman
Devin Nunes (CA-21)
Devin Nunes (CA-21)
and Special Guest and Special Guest

Congressman Frank Lucas (OK-3)
Congressman Frank Lucas (OK-3)
For a Fundraising Reception in Support of the For a Fundraising Reception in Support of the
Devin Nunes Campaign Committee Devin Nunes Campaign Committee
Saturday September 20, 2008 4:00 PM Saturday September 20, 2008 4:00 PM
at the Home of at the Home of
Ken and Alicia Puryear Ken and Alicia Puryear
5911 W. Prospect Drive Visalia, CA 93291 5911 W. Prospect Drive Visalia, CA 93291
Located in “The Lakes” Located in “The Lakes”
Join us to watch the Join us to watch the

Fresno State vs. Toledo Game Fresno State vs. Toledo Game
Kickoff at 4PM Kickoff at 4PM
Remarks at Half-Time Remarks at Half-Time
Leadership Levels: Leadership Levels:

$2000 Platinum $500 Silver $2000 Platinum $500 Silver
$1000 Gold $250 Bronze per couple $1000 Gold $250 Bronze per couple
Please RSVP by September 12th on the enclosed form or Please RSVP by September 12th on the enclosed form or
call (559) 739-8903 or email Nicky@DevinNunes.net. call (559) 739-8903 or email Nicky@DevinNunes.net.
Paid for and Authorized by the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee. Paid for and Authorized by the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee.
Not Printed at Government Expense. Not Printed at Government Expense.
Special Guest Special Guest
Congressman Frank Lucas Congressman Frank Lucas

Frank Lucas has given a lifetime of service to Oklahoma, as a legisla- Frank Lucas has given a lifetime of service to Oklahoma, as a legisla-
tor and representative of rural Oklahoma values at the state and fed- tor and representative of rural Oklahoma values at the state and fed-
eral level for more than 17 years. eral level for more than 17 years.
Lucas has forged a career of consistent conservative values as a Lucas has forged a career of consistent conservative values as a
Member of Congress representing the Third Congressional District. Member of Congress representing the Third Congressional District.
Since his first election to Congress 12 years ago, he has served as a Since his first election to Congress 12 years ago, he has served as a
tireless crusader for less government spending and lower taxes. tireless crusader for less government spending and lower taxes.
Lucas has fought to protect traditional Oklahoma values. He sup- Lucas has fought to protect traditional Oklahoma values. He sup-
ported legislation to define the institution of marriage as between ported legislation to define the institution of marriage as between
one man and one woman. When federal court rulings from liberal one man and one woman. When federal court rulings from liberal
judges threatened to have the phrase "under God" removed from the judges threatened to have the phrase "under God" removed from the
Pledge of Allegiance, Lucas moved quickly to author legislation to Pledge of Allegiance, Lucas moved quickly to author legislation to
protect the Pledge for American schoolchildren. Lucas has served as protect the Pledge for American schoolchildren. Lucas has served as
a defender of the private property rights of Oklahomans, and of their a defender of the private property rights of Oklahomans, and of their
right to bear arms. right to bear arms.
As a lifelong farmer and rancher and House Agriculture subcommit- As a lifelong farmer and rancher and House Agriculture subcommit-
tee chairman, Lucas has been a central figure in shaping agriculture tee chairman, Lucas has been a central figure in shaping agriculture
policy in Congress. He authored the conservation title of the most policy in Congress. He authored the conservation title of the most
recent Farm Bill, and was one of the Members of Congress who recent Farm Bill, and was one of the Members of Congress who
crafted the final version of the 2002 bill. crafted the final version of the 2002 bill.
Lucas' expertise has made him a trusted advisor to other Members of Lucas' expertise has made him a trusted advisor to other Members of
Congress on agriculture policy. He has received awards for his work Congress on agriculture policy. He has received awards for his work
on agriculture issues from the American Farm Bureau Federation, the on agriculture issues from the American Farm Bureau Federation, the
National Farmers Union, the National Association of Wheat Growers, National Farmers Union, the National Association of Wheat Growers,
and the Oklahoma Wheat Commission. In fact, his extensive knowl- and the Oklahoma Wheat Commission. In fact, his extensive knowl-
edge on agriculture policy caused experts to edge on agriculture policy caused experts to
name Lucas among the potential selections name Lucas among the potential selections
as President Bush's Secretary of Agriculture. as President Bush's Secretary of Agriculture.
Lucas believes the best way he can repre- Lucas believes the best way he can repre-
sent Oklahomans is by staying close to his sent Oklahomans is by staying close to his
roots in Roger Mills County. When he's not roots in Roger Mills County. When he's not
voting in Washington, he travels home to voting in Washington, he travels home to
work on his farm and cattle ranch with his work on his farm and cattle ranch with his
wife, Lynda. Lucas graduated from Okla- wife, Lynda. Lucas graduated from Okla-
homa State University in 1982 with a de- homa State University in 1982 with a de-
gree in Agricultural Economics. Frank and gree in Agricultural Economics. Frank and
Lynda have three children and one grand- Lynda have three children and one grand-
child. child.
Reception with Congressman Devin Nunes Reception with Congressman Devin Nunes
Please RSVP by September 12, 2008 Please RSVP by September 12, 2008
Sorry, I/we will not be able to attend, enclosed is our contribution. Sorry, I/we will not be able to attend, enclosed is our contribution.
Yes! I/We (Indicate # ___ ) will be able to attend. Here is my contribution: Yes! I/We (Indicate # ___ ) will be able to attend. Here is my contribution:
Leadership Levels: ____ $2000 Platinum ____ $500 Silver Leadership Levels: ____ $2000 Platinum ____ $500 Silver
____ $1000 Gold ____ Or $250 Per Couple ____ $1000 Gold ____ Or $250 Per Couple
You can count on my support in the following areas: You can count on my support in the following areas:
Apply a bumper sticker to my vehicle(s) Have a high profile location for a Apply a bumper sticker to my vehicle(s) Have a high profile location for a
Place a YARD sign in my yard or at my 4’ X 8’ sign Place a YARD sign in my yard or at my 4’ X 8’ sign
business Volunteer at campaign headquarters business Volunteer at campaign headquarters
Call my friends to find new lawn Make phone calls Call my friends to find new lawn Make phone calls
sign locations Other________________________ sign locations Other________________________
Federal law requires campaigns to use their best efforts to collect and report the name, mailing address, Federal law requires campaigns to use their best efforts to collect and report the name, mailing address,
occupation and name of employer for individuals whose contributions exceed $200 in an election cycle. occupation and name of employer for individuals whose contributions exceed $200 in an election cycle.
Name Name
Occupation/Title Occupation/Title
Company/Employer Company/Employer
Spouse Spouse
Occupation/Title Occupation/Title
Employer Employer
Address aaaa
Home Address aaaa
Home
Business Business
City, ST Zip City, ST Zip
Email Email
Home Home
Phone aaaa
Business Fax Cell Phone aaaa
Business Fax Cell
Please make your non-corporate checks payable and mail to: Please make your non-corporate checks payable and mail to:
Devin Nunes Campaign Committee Devin Nunes Campaign Committee
PO Box 6545, Visalia, CA 93290-6545 PO Box 6545, Visalia, CA 93290-6545
Phone (559) 739-8903 Fax (559) 739-8994 FEC # 26-0015467 Phone (559) 739-8903 Fax (559) 739-8994 FEC # 26-0015467
Paid for and Authorized by the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee. Paid for and Authorized by the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee.
Not Printed at Government Expense. Contributions to this committee are not deductible as Not Printed at Government Expense. Contributions to this committee are not deductible as
charitable donations. Contributions from corporations and foreign nationals are prohibited. charitable donations. Contributions from corporations and foreign nationals are prohibited.
NORTH
W. Prospec NORTH
t Dr. W. Prospec
t Dr.
in Dr.
Elow Dr.
W. win
W . Elo
Ken and Alicia Puryear “The Lakes”

Elowin Ave Ken and Alicia Puryear “The Lakes”
Elowin Ave
5911 W. Prospect Drive W. Sweet Dr. 5911 W. Prospect Drive W. Sweet Dr.
Visalia, CA 93291 Visalia, CA 93291
Located in “The Lakes” Goshen Avenue
Located in “The Lakes” Goshen Avenue
Enter at the gate care of the

“Puryear Event.”
Akers
Akers
A golf cart shuttle will be
A golf cart shuttle will be
available to transport guests Hwy 198
available to transport guests Hwy 198
who need assistance.
NORTH
W. Prospec NORTH
t Dr. W. Prospec
t Dr.
Dr .
Elo win in D
r.
.
W . Elow
W
Ken and Alicia Puryear
“The Lakes”
Elowin Ave Ken and Alicia Puryear “The Lakes”
Elowin Ave
W. Sweet Dr. 5911 W. Prospect Drive
Visalia, CA 93291 W. Sweet Dr.
Visalia, CA 93291
Located in “The Lakes” Goshen Avenue Located in “The Lakes” Goshen Avenue
“Puryear Event.” Enter at the gate care of the
Akers
Akers
A golf cart shuttle will be Park along W. Prospect Dr.
available to transport guests A golf cart shuttle will be
Hwy 198 available to transport guests
who need assistance. Hwy 198
Tulare
Tulare, CA 93274
2433 E Oakdale Ave
Visalia
You are Invited to Join
Congressman
Devin Nunes
and a
Special Guest
for the Ag Industry Round-up
fundraising reception
at the home of
Tuesday
May 27, 2008
6:00 to 8:00 P.M.
Leadership Levels:
$2000 Platinum
At the home of $1000 Gold
Scot and Sue Ann Hillman $500 Silver
2433 E. Oakdale Ave. Or $250 Per Ticket
*Spouse free with tickets
Tulare, CA 93274
(see map on back)
Please call 559.739.8903 or
email Nicky@DevinNunes.net to
RSVP or get more information.

Not printed at government expense. Contributions to this committee are not deductible as charitable donations. Contributions from corporations and foreign nationals are prohibited.
An Evening with Congressman Nunes
Pleas
e
by Ma RSVP
y 2 3r
Sorry, I/we will not be able to attend, however here is our contribution. d
Yes! I/We (Indicate # ____ ) will be able to attend.
____$2000 Platinum Federal law requires campaigns to use their best efforts to collect and report the name, mailing address,
____$1000 Gold occupation and name of employer for individuals whose contributions exceed $200 in an election cycle.
____$500 Silver Name
____$250 Bronze
Occupation/Title
Please make your
Employer
non-corporate checks
payable and Spouse
mail with this form to:
Occupation/Title
Devin Nunes Campaign Committee Employer
PO Box 6545 Home
Visalia, CA 93290-6545 Address aaaa
Business
City, ST Zip
Email
Home
Phone aaaa
Business
Fax Cell
Paid for and Authorized by the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee. FEC# C00370056
Not Printed at Government Expense. Contributions to this committee are not deductible as charitable donations. Contributions from corporations and foreign nationals are prohibited.
An Evening with Congressman Nunes

Pleas
e
by Ma RSVP
y 2 3r
Sorry, I/we will not be able to attend, however here is our contribution. d
Yes! I/We (Indicate # ____ ) will be able to attend.
____$2000 Platinum Federal law requires campaigns to use their best efforts to collect and report the name, mailing address,
____$1000 Gold occupation and name of employer for individuals whose contributions exceed $200 in an election cycle.
____$500 Silver Name
____$250 Bronze
Occupation/Title
Please make your
Employer
non-corporate checks
payable and Spouse
mail with this form to:
Occupation/Title
Devin Nunes Campaign Committee Employer
PO Box 6545 Home
Visalia, CA 93290-6545 Address aaaa
Business
City, ST Zip
Email
Home
Phone aaaa
Business
Fax Cell
Paid for and Authorized by the Devin Nunes Campaign Committee. FEC# C00370056
Not Printed at Government Expense. Contributions to this committee are not deductible as charitable donations. Contributions from corporations and foreign nationals are prohibited.
Visalia

2433 E Oakdale Ave
Tulare, CA 93274
Tulare
ASSISTANT MAJORITY WHIP
DEVIN NUNES
21ST DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA
COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS
1013 LONGWORTH HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING SUBCOMMITTEES:
WASHINGTON, DC 20515 OVERSIGHT
(202) 225-2523 UNITED STATES SOCIAL SECURITY
113 NORTH CHURCH STREET HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SUITE 208
VISALIA, CA 93291
(559) 733-3861
264 CLOVIS AVENUE November 19, 2009

SUITE 206
CLOVIS, CA 93612
(559) 323-5235
WWW.NUNES.HOUSE.GOV
Dr. Glenda Humiston

State Director
USDA Rural Development
430 G Street
Davis, CA 95616
Dear Dr. Humiston,
I am writing to express my support for Top O' The Morn Farm’s application for the Value Added
Producer Grant program (CFDA# 10.352). This grant would be instrumental in helping to
expand the marketing and consumption of milk through sales of a value added specialty product.
The San Joaquin valley of California, which accounts for the majority of US milk production, is
plagued by high crime, poverty, unemployment, and low educational attainment. The area is in
such dire straits that President Bush reinitiated an Executive Order requiring all Federal
Agencies to work together to help the region. The level of federal investment has lagged behind
that of the balance of the state and nation, so the need for federal investment in the San Joaquin
Valley is great. A recent study conducted by the Congressional Research Service indicates that
the San Joaquin Valley receives federal funding at a far lower rate ($4,736 per capita) than the
national average ($6,814 per capita). I hope that you would keep this in mind as you consider
the merits of this application. This funding would be a valuable step in helping the area keep a
precious job resource.
Once again, I would like to reiterate my support for this request. I also ask that you advise me of
the status and keep me informed of any new developments regarding the request. If you have
any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Devin Nunes
Member of Congress
Restoring the San Joaquin River
An update by Representative Devin Nunes
United States Congressman, California’s 21st Congressional District October 2007

The San Joaquin River Settlement:
Challenges ahead and a call to action, By Rep. Devin Nunes
The background (NRDC) in the Delta Smelt case. Instead called upon to elaborate what co-equal
I made a commitment to my district of demanding NRDC stand by the origi- means, we are provided ambiguous
that I would do my best to achieve pas- nal deal, some of Friant seems content statement that indicate an unwilling-
sage of a San Joaquin River Settlement to accept any settlement in lieu of a ness, at least on the part of NRDC, to
agreement in Congress. Despite efforts court judgment. make meaningful their commitment to
to misrepresent my position, I have the water management goal.
never opposed a settlement of this dis- I understand the dilemma of Friant
pute. In my view, as long as the agree- directors. When this case started 18 Below is one example of how the set-
ment is fair to the people who live and years ago, their lawyers and consultants tling parties and their champions re-
farm in our valley, it should be given a counseled them to stand and fight. spond to questions about how the water
chance to work. Now, many of the same advisors are management goal will be achieved. In
adamant that any settlement (no matter one statement, California’s Senators
how flawed) is superior to going back to express their complete support for the
court. Although I dispute the fact that co-equal status of river restoration and
“I have asked a lot of hard
Friant water users’ interests are served water management goal and they point
questions. This has frus- by the current proposal, which does to Friant’s report as a means to achieve
trated those who expected nothing to achieve its own water man- the goal of mitigating water loss. In an-
agement goal, Friant’s support alone is other quote, Senator Feinstein opposes
the fanfare of a settlement not enough to convince me that our legislation necessary to move forward
to be followed by a rubber region’s interests are served by the with Friant’s water projects.
stamp in Congress,” agreement.
“We strongly agree that the water
Rep. Devin Nunes As part of my effort to determine management goal is fully co-equal
whether or not negotiators have crafted with the river restoration
a deal that protects all of our interests, I goal ...earlier this year Friant submit-
I recognize that Friant is in a difficult have asked a lot of hard questions. ted a 76-page list of possible pro-
position facing a hostile, activist judge This has frustrated those who expected jects to implement the water man-
who has indicated he will rule in favor of the fanfare of a settlement to be fol- agement goal,” - Senator’s Dianne Fein-
stein and Barbara Boxer, responding to
the environmentalists. Indeed, the judge lowed by a rubber stamp in Congress. concerns expressed by Friant Water Users
has ruled that the only acceptable solu- Authority Chairman Kole Upton, Sept. 14,
tion is a self sustaining salmon fishery. What I have discovered during this
From my perspective, what is best for process is that in an effort to rush a
the Valley is an extension of the current deal through Congress, some of the In this statement and others, both
tailout fishery that exists below Friant settling parties have consistently mis- senators seem to endorse Friant’s water
Dam. This could be accomplished represented facts concerning their deal management report. The document
quickly and without devastating effects to farmers and the general public. contains a variety of water projects that
on Valley residents and communities. have been described by Friant officials
But, as is so often the case in today’s The truth as “the solution” to reduced surface
society, unelected radical environmen- The settling parties have repeatedly water supplies. Indeed, there are no
talists find sympathetic, appointed insisted that they intend to mitigate the other documents that explain how the
Judges to order burdensome and harm- problems associated with water being water management goal could be met.
ful rulings on productive citizens. redirected from current uses. In testi-
mony before Congress and in official Because of the importance and re-
Even though Friant is in a difficult correspondence, Friant, NRDC, and ported co-equal status of water man-
situation, a deal was made at the be- their champions have insisted that the agement and river restoration, I tried to
hest of legislators. Now, this deal has river restoration goals and water man- find Friant’s project list in the settle-
been compromised due to the actions agement goals of the settlement are co- ment agreement submitted to Congress.
of Natural Resources Defense Council equal components. However, when (Continued on page 2)
The San Joaquin River Settlement Page 2
(Continued from page 1)
According to the nonpartisan Congres-

sional Research Service (CRS), “no
specific water management projects
are identified as part of the settlement,
nor is it clear how funding under the
settlement would be divided between
efforts to achieve the restoration goal
and efforts to achieve the water man-
agement goal.” In fact, nowhere in the
two pages generously devoted to the
water management goals are there any
water projects specified or authorized.
At the same time, more than 18 pages
of the settlement document are devoted Increased groundwater pumping will degrade groundwater quality, especially for public water
to river restoration and the specific ac- systems and domestic and agricultural wells currently of marginal quality.
tions that will be undertaken to achieve
that goal. projects as outlined in Friant’s report. At lems lie ahead for the residents of val-
least, that is, none that the federal gov- ley communities. City and county offi-
You don’t have to be a skeptic to be ernment will be involved with. So, the cials have objected to the Friant / NRDC
suspicious when someone tells you that question remains. What do Friant and legislation because it fails to address
they have a plan to deal with a problem, NRDC have in mind when they claim substantial regional water supply chal-
but will not put it in writing, or in this river restoration and water manage- lenges that will be aggravated by the
case in their legislation. ment are to be co-equal priorities? settlement.
Furthermore, many other organiza-
In an effort to further explore the the- The consequences tions have stepped forward to express
ory of the co-equal nature of water man- Knowing that we will not recover water Tulare County Board of Supervisors
agement and river restoration, I intro- diverted for river restoration, it is impor- “The settlement represents a signifi-
duced the San Joaquin River Settlement tant to understand the likely conse- cant economic and environmental
Water Management Goal Implementa- quences. challenges to our communities…For
tion Act. The bill is simple. It does noth- this reason, changes need to be made
ing more than authorize the water man- The nonpartisan CRS estimates that
to the Settlement Agreement before it
agement projects Friant references in the average annual reduction in water becomes law to address the human
the report it submitted to Congress. d e l i v e r i e s i s 2 2 5 , 0 0 0 a c r e -
impacts,” - Resolution of the County of
Furthermore, it provides this authoriza- feet. However, averages are mislead- Tulare, January 9, 2007
tion only if projects are deemed to be ing. For example, Friant operates in a
feasible. Normal-Dry and Normal-Wet water year,
as identified in the Settlement, 60% of Kern County Board of Supervisors
“While the Settlement Agreement con-
The reaction to the introduction of this the time. In these years, the average tains assurances that the settling par-
legislation has provided me further evi- water delivery reduction would be ties intend to deal with the problem of
dence that the claims made by Friant, 302,000 acre-feet . reduced surface water deliveries, it
NRDC and its supporters are untrue. provides no concrete plans to address
There will be no serious efforts to re- It is important to note that water sup- these projected water losses…The
solve the water supply shortages result- ply reductions caused by the settlement
Board urges federal legislators to
ing from implementation of the settle- will not be felt equally across our region. work to include language in the San
ment. This is a recent quote from Sena- The legislation is silent on this impor- Joaquin River Settlement implement-
tor Dianne Feinstein: tant detail. Therefore, water districts will
experience losses depending on the ing legislation that addresses losses
in surface water and groundwater
“I don’t believe this is the way to pro- nature of their water supply contract. supplies,” - Official Resolution of the County
ceed (referring to my proposal to Many communities on the East Side of of Kern, January 24, 2007
authorize Friant’s projects). The fo- the valley with junior water rights with
cus right now should be on restoring Class II contracts or that rely on Section The City of Lindsay
the San Joaquin into a livable river, 215 water will bear the brunt of the “…the City of Lindsay receives on aver-
enacting the settlement and meeting impact associated with lost water. They age 70% of its municipal water supply
both the river restoration and the and others will be forced to find alterna- from the Friant system…any changes
water-management goals,” - Senator tives to current surface water deliveries. to water deliveries from Friant will
Dianne Feinstein, Visalia Times Delta, Octo- With surface supplies already over- undermine the very foundation of our
ber 6, 2007 prescribed, this means increased economy and threaten the survival of
ground water pumping. our community,” - Official Resolution, City
of Lindsay January 9, 2007
What the Senator is telling us, in Local communities throughout our
Washington DC beltway talk, is that region have testified that, absent (Continued on page 3)
there will be no water management changes to the settlement, serious prob-
The San Joaquin River Settlement Page 3
(Continued from page 2) were done in good faith, yet one year The future
after the settlement was signed we see With all of the evidence suggesting
their concerns. The San Joaquin River NRDC targeting Friant water again. serious water supply challenges associ-
Task Force transmitted a letter to Con- Therefore, does anyone really believe ated with the settlement, and an unwill-
gress, following the testimony of an NRDC is serious about helping us get ingness on the part of settling parties to
NRDC representative in the Delta Smelt our water back? put their water management plans in
Case. The letter expressed grave con- legislation, it is important for us to make
cerns about the inconsistencies of our voices heard.
NRDC’s position on the settlement and
their expert’s testimony in the case. While there have been many missed
opportunities, I will continue to demand
NRDC’s expert (Dr. Peter Gleick), testi- that the restoration and water manage-
fied in the Delta Smelt case that West ment receive equal priority and I will
Side losses could be replaced by Friant vigorously fight any proposal before
water. This is the same expert that said Congress that does nothing more than
agricultural users in Friant were wasting pay lip service to our regional water
20% of the water which could be dedi- challenges.
cated to river restoration. The settling
Devin Nunes
parties have told us that negotiations Member of Congress
Missed Opportunities
In August of 2006, the Friant Board of forward to develop a water management goal. Summarily
Directors voted unanimously to approve water conservation opposed by the settling parties without
their participation in the settlement of program which would a vote of the Friant Board.
their 18-year legal battle with the Natu- have consisted of vol-
ral Resources untary and temporary May 2007: A proposal was put forward
Defense Coun- forbearance of irriga- to provide a legal action alternative. In
cil. Since then, tion. Payments would this case, the proposal would have al-
despite events have been provided to landown- lowed anyone to sue the Secretary of
that have funda- ers. Furthermore, if the implementation Interior to compel him/her to implement
mentally changed of the water conservation program did the water management goal in the set-
the deal, the set- not adequately mitigate adverse water tlement. If the water management goal
tling parties have supply impacts then a voluntary pro- was not implemented than impacted
summarily rejected all efforts to provide gram of permanent land retirement parties would be afforded the right to
concrete solutions that allow the water would be instituted as a measure of last seek damages. Summarily opposed by
management goals to be achieved. resort. Summarily opposed by the set- the settling parties without a vote of the
None of the offers or suggested tling parties without a vote of the Friant Friant Board.
changes to the settlement have ever Board.
been officially voted on by the Friant October 2007: I proposed legislation to
Board of Directors. February 2007: A proposal was put for- authorize projects to meet the water
ward to transfer the San Luis Unit on management goal. The bill would au-
October 2006: The settling parties ne- the West Side into private hands and thorize feasibil-
gotiated an agreement with third par- replace water that will be lost by Friant ity studies and
ties, offering protections from the settle- contractors as a result of the San Joa- possible con-
ment and its implementing legisla- quin River Settlement. The Westside struction of (if
tion. No official approval by the Friant would have relinquished its claim to found feasible)
Board. more than 400,000 acre-feet of Central all the projects
Valley Project water, making available included in the
December 2006: I offered a complete on an annual basis an average of Friant Water
legislative alternative, supported by key 100,000 acre-feet for Friant’s Users Authority
House leaders, that would have termi- use. Summarily opposed by the settling document titled
nated the settlement and replaced it parties without a vote of the Friant “San Joaquin
with Congressional action. It would have Board. River Restora-
provided sufficient flows to restore the tion Program –
river and mitigated for groundwater March 2007: Tulare County Supervisor Water Management Goal: Recirculation,
impacts. Summarily opposed by the Allen Ishida proposed an amendment Recapture of Restoration Flows and
settling parties without a vote of the that would have authorized a feasibility Mitigation of Water Supply Reductions –
Friant Board. study and construction of pumping and Potential Programs & Projects.” The
conveyance facilities on the main stem settling parties have yet to take an offi-
February 2007: A proposal was put of the San Joaquin River to meet the cial position on this legislative proposal.
The San Joaquin River Settlement
Setting the Record Straight
Myth One: Friant has no other option terms of the settlement because no Myth Five: The water losses outlined
but to settle. other alternative has been offered. in the settlement will be 15% of the
average annual deliveries evenly di-
Fact: While some say that Friant’s Fact: To date, there have been seven vided among all Friant Division long-
political and legal options outside the alternatives offered to the settling term water contractors. (Q&A Document
settlement are dim, it is important to parties -- including legislation to com- pg. 1)
note that they do have options. In- pletely replace the settlement with a
deed, Friant’s representatives in the congressionally-mandated restoration Fact: No decisions have yet been
House of Representatives and the of the river and full water recov- made as to how water losses due to
United States Senate have the ability ery. Alternatives that have been of- the settlement will be apportioned
to legislate a reasonable solution to fered included Friant replacement among Friant water users. The non-
the lawsuit and restore the San Joa- water from the Westside, water con- partisan CRS, based on existing water
quin River -- independent of the servation programs and idling of land, law, assumed that non long-term wa-
Courts and the settle- authorization of water recovery and ter contracts will be the first to lose
ment. Furthermore, Friant has a last replacement projects, and a legal re- water, then Class II water contracts,
resort legal appeal, under a “pre- course option if the water manage- and finally Class I contracts. Under
emption” claim, that can be taken all ment goals were not met. All offers this methodology, the average reduc-
the way to the Supreme Court. These have been summarily opposed by the tion for Class I contract deliveries is
are options, while remote, that are settling parties without a single vote estimated at 5%; the estimated aver-
currently available. The bottom line is by the Friant Board. age reduction for Class II deliveries is
that many events have transpired 27%; and the estimated average re-
Myth Three: The Settlement will only duction for §215 deliveries is 47% .()
reduce water deliveries by 170,000
acre-feet. (Friant Q&A Document pg. 1) Myth Six: Water prices will not
change as a result of the Settlement.
Fact: The nonpartisan Congressional
Research Service estimates that the Fact: Under a proposed amendment
average annual reduction in water to H.R. 24 being drafted by Friant (see
d e l i v e r i e s i s 2 2 5 , 0 0 0 a c r e - Friant’s Legal Counsel’s memo Sept.
feet. However, averages are mislead- 2007), Friant would advance forward
ing. For example, Friant operates in a their repayment of capital costs to
Normal-Dry and Normal-Wet water solve a congressional budgetary re-
year, as identified in the settlement, quirement. This would inevitably re-
60% of the time. In these years, the sult in the need for Friant to seek pri-
over the past year that have funda- average water delivery reduction vate market financing to cover the
mentally affected the viability of recir- would be 302,000 acre-feet. This advanced costs. This additional cost
culating the lost water. Therefore, does not include an additional 10% could significantly alter the price of
Friant needs to take some time and buffer flows that are authorized in the water – some areas could see prices
reassess their situation and deter- settlement. (Steiner Report 2005) over $100 an acre-foot. Furthermore,
mine, once again, through an official because there will be less water to go
vote, if the settlement is the only vi- Myth Four: The settlement will end around, water purchased on the open
able option at this point. In this as- any future litigation on the San Joa- market will certainly increase due to
sessment, they need to keep in mind quin River issue. supply and demand.
that if this settlement is authorized by
federal legislation, all of Friant’s op- Fact: There is nothing in the settle-
tions immediately evaporate. Friant ment or the authorizing legislation
would have no recourse with the that prevents a third party from suing
Courts, the Administration, or the Con- the federal government and/or Friant
gress. They will have to permanently Water Users Authority to release more
live with their deal, even if environ- water. Third parties could continue to
mental organizations challenge every threaten Friant’s water under other
project that would implement the wa- federal and state statutes outside of
ter management goal. the settlement and its implementing
legislation. (i.e. the ESA and the Clean Water
Myth Two: Friant has to accept the Act) (continued on reverse)
The San Joaquin River Settlement
Setting the Record Straight
(continued from front)
Myth Seven: The settlement author- face the same unpleasant option if Fact Two: The settling parties have
izes construction of many projects to the promise of recirculating the lost artificially set the bar low to achieve
recover the res- water turns out to be illusory. success. The stipulation of settlement
toration flows. on page 25 states that the restoration
(Friant Letter to Myth Nine: Restoring the San Joaquin project is successful if 500 salmon
Senator Feinstein, return to the river.
River will cost $500 million .
Sept. 2007, and
(Congressional Budget Office)
memo from Friant
Attorney to Senator Fact Three: Again, according to CRS,
Feinstein, Nov. 2006) Fact: The Congressional Budget Office “if the premise is true that Chinook
estimate only includes what is clearly salmon historically inhabiting the San
Fact: According outlined in the implementing legisla- Joaquin River were uniquely adapted
to CRS, “no spe- tion, H.R. 24. The estimate does not to withstand otherwise lethal warm
cific water man- include restoring Reach 4b which water temperatures, then one of the
agement projects are identified as would cost $357 million; the legisla- key questions affecting restoration
part of the settlement, nor is it clear tion simply calls for a feasibility study success may be whether any remnant
how funding under the settlement on Reach 4b. The estimate also does of this uniquely adapted genetic strain
would be divided between efforts to not include any of Friant’s proposed of Chinook salmon has been pre-
achieve the restoration goal and ef- projects to meet the water manage- served and is available for the pro-
forts to achieve the water management goals which would cost $2 bil- posed San Joaquin River restoration
ment goal.” Furthermore, the Bureau lion (see Friant Water Management effort.”
of Reclamation in a letter dated July Goal: Potential Programs & Projects,
2007 said that “Reclamation is un- Feb. 2007). Additionally, the legisla-
able to state with absolute certainty tion does not provide clear authoriza-
that H.R. 24 would provide all the nec- tion for the projects included in the
essary authority to construct all of the Friant proposal. The economic im-
project proposals.” (see project proposals pacts of reduced water supplies
in Friant Water Management Goal: Potential within Friant have also been ignored
Programs & Projects document, Feb. 2007) in cost estimates.
Myth Eight: The settlement provides Myth Ten: There will be a thriving
long-term water supply certainty. salmon habitat on the San Joaquin
(Settling Parties’ press release pg. 1) If Chinook salmon are unable to thrive in the
River when the restoration releases
warm waters of the San Joaquin, environmen-
Fact: The settlement only lasts 20 begin. talists will likely seek additional releases.
years. “After December 31, 2025 …
any Party may file a motion in this Fact One: According to CRS, “all or Myth Eleven: Studies show it is feasi-
action in the United States District many environmental factors may need ble that restoration of salmon to the
Court for the Eastern District of Cali- to be favorable to permit this species San Joaquin River can be successfully
fornia (Sacramento Division), to re- to complete its migratory life his- achieved.
quest an increase, decrease or mate- tory.” In other words, you would need
rial change in the quantity and/or tim- a “perfect storm” of environmental Fact: According to CRS, no federally
ing of the Restoration conditions for restoration to be suc- sponsored feasibility study has been
Flows.” (Stipulation of Settlement, pg. 24) cessful year after year. accomplished on restoring the com-
plete 153 mile length of the San Joa-
We should not forget the havoc that The CRS continues on to say that quin River. In fact, the National Ma-
the Central Valley Project Improve- “while the optimistic view holds that rine Fisheries Service considers it far
ment Act (CVPIA) inflicted on the San all these [environmental] factors in- more economical to enhance existing
Joaquin Valley. Water lost by the deed can be favorable, the pessimis- populations of salmon than to at-
Westside was supposed to be miti- tic view would point out that all these tempt to restore an extirpated spe-
gated. To date, the only mitigation factors, many beyond human control, cies. (Role of Large Extirpated Areas in Recov-
effort has been the voluntary and in- may not be expected to be favorable ery, NMFS, Jan. 2007)
voluntary fallowing of land both on a in any single year, leading to popula-
temporary and permanent basis. We tion stress and decline, if not total
failure in some years.”

Tulare County Supervisors PRA - 3

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Tulare County Supervisors PRA - 3

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

MAIL

Newsletter signup: www.nunes.house.gov <http://www.nunes.house.gov/>

Newsletter signup: www.nunes.house.gov

Statement for the Record

By the Honorable Devin Nunes

November 15, 2007

Committee on Natural Resources: The San Joaquin River Restoration

Since my first election to public office, I have never heard a single

It should be alarming to all of us that radical environmentalists are

As the elected representative of nearly 700,000 constituents, I made a

Nevertheless, as part of my effort to determine whether or not

Today, we see a bill, mandated by the courts and special interests,

The parties to the settlement have come to Congress and asked us to

I have always had faith in my colleagues that congressional courtesy

We are at a crossroads and the economic and social future of my

Newsletter signup: www.nunes.house.gov <http://www.nunes.house.gov/>

Statement for the Record

November 15, 2007

Newsletter signup: www.nunes.house.gov

Please join me and a Special Guest

for the Ag Industry Round-up Reception

May 27, 2008

6:00 to 8:00 P.M.

2433 E. Oakdale Ave.

Please see the attachment for more information.

Phone (559) 739-8903

Fax (559) 739-8994

Please join me and a Special Guest

Please see the attachment for more information.

Phone (559) 739-8903

Fax (559) 739-8994

Pete Vander Poel

>>> "Mederos, Melissa" <melissa.mederos@mail.house.gov> 2/3/2009 3:58 PM >>>

Feel free to respond with any questions or to RSVP. Thank you.

Pete Vander Poel

>>> "Mederos, Melissa" <melissa.mederos@mail.house.gov> 2/3/2009 3:58 PM >>>

Feel free to respond with any questions or to RSVP. Thank you.

Congressman Devin Nunes (CA-21)

113 N. Church St., Suite 208

Ph: (559) 733-3861

Fax: (559) 733-3865

Can you forward this around? Thanks

From: Nelson, Damon

February 26, 2009

The Honorable Barack Obama

President of the United States

1600 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Dear President Obama:

A simple measure that would save up to 80,000 jobs would be to relax

Your administration requested a list of "shovel ready" projects that can

* $3 million for the completion of State Route 180 from

* $2.5 million for Friant Road Reconstruction (SR 41 - Shepherd)

* $5 million for Manning Avenue Rehabilitation in Reedley,

* $4.2 million for Dinuba Avenue Rehabilitation in Reedley,

* $7 million for Betty Drive Widening in Tulare County,

* $14 million for Ben Maddox Bridge Widening in Visalia,

* $48 million for Road 80 expansion in Tulare County,

* $7.2 million for Road 192 expansion in Tulare County,

CC: Speaker Nancy Pelosi; Interior Secretary Ken Salazar; Governor

Can you forward this around? Thanks

From: Nelson, Damon

February 26, 2009

The Honorable Barack Obama

President of the United States