Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Q1 Do you approve or disapprove of Governor Q4 It was recently reported that developers, union
Jerry Brown’s job performance? leaders and others seeking city approvals were
told to contribute to a specific candidate and
Approve .......................................................... 70%
not to contribute to another candidate by then-
Disapprove...................................................... 16% mayor Lee, with the participation of his top staff
and top city Board of Supervisors members
Not sure .......................................................... 14%
and that “we will be watching”. Does this give
Q2 Some cities like Los Angeles ban city you very serious concerns, somewhat serious
appointees from contributing or raising money concerns, minor concerns or no real concerns?
for officials who appoint them or to candidates
backed by them. Do you think San Francisco Very serious concerns .................................... 62%
should ban appointees from fundraising or Somewhat serious concerns........................... 21%
contributing to candidates for election to City
Hall offices, or not? Minor concerns ............................................... 12%
Think San Francisco should ban appointees No real concerns............................................. 3%
from fundraising or contributing to candidates
for election to City Hall offices......................... 58% Not sure .......................................................... 2%
Do not think San Francisco should ban Q5 At the same meeting, billionaire City Hall
appointees from fundraising or contributing to insider Ron Conway also said that if the
candidates for election to City Hall offices ...... 24% developer donated money to the mayor's
Not sure .......................................................... 18% favorite candidate, that Conway would make a
donation in an equal amount to an organization
Q3 California allows for elected officials to ask supported by the developer. Does this give you
others to write checks for a special purpose, as very serious concerns, somewhat serious
it did for the America’s Cup debts or to concerns, minor concerns or no real concerns
celebrate City Hall’s 100th anniversary. This about Ron Conway and the candidates he
request can come at the same time the supports?
potential donor has decisions being made by
the official who requests the check. Do you Very serious concerns .................................... 56%
think people who have pending decisions being
Somewhat serious concerns........................... 24%
made by public officials should be banned from
being able to write checks for a special Minor concerns ............................................... 11%
purpose at that official’s request, or not?
No real concerns............................................. 3%
Think people who have pending decisions
being made by public officials should be Not sure .......................................................... 6%
banned from being able to write checks for a Q6 Ethics Commissioner Quentin Kopp has called
special purpose at that official’s request ......... 62% on the Ethics staff to fully investigate this
Do not think people who have pending incident, using subpeonas if necessary to
decisions being made by public officials guarantee that meeting participants testify
should be banned from being able to write
under oath. Do you support or oppose this
checks for a special purpose at that official’s
request............................................................ 20% ethics investigation?
Gender Gender
Woma- Prefer not Woma- Prefer not
Base n Man to ident... Base n Man to ident...
Ban on People With Those Seeking
Pending Decisions Approvals Told to
Writing Special Contribute to Specific
Checks Yes/No Candidates Level of
Concern
Think people who hav- 62% 59% 71% 34%
e pending decisions Very serious concerns 62% 59% 67% 41%
being made by public
Somewhat serious 21% 18% 22% 27%
officials should be ba-
nned from being able concerns
to write checks for ... Minor concerns 12% 17% 5% 29%
Do not think people w- 20% 22% 18% 29% No real concerns 3% 3% 3% 2%
ho have pending deci-
sions being made by Not sure 2% 3% 2% 0%
public officials should
be banned from being
able to write checks...
Not sure 17% 20% 11% 37%
Gender Gender
Woma- Prefer not Woma- Prefer not
Base n Man to ident... Base n Man to ident...
Prohibit Contributions Pay-To-Play and
from Developers with Corruption Impact on
Pending Decisions Quality of Life
Yes/No
Very negative impact 62% 61% 68% 31%
Think San Francisco 78% 78% 83% 41%
Somewhat negative 23% 25% 23% 6%
should prohibit devel-
opers with pending d- impact
ecisions from contrib- Somewhat positive 4% 2% 3% 29%
uting or fundraising f- impact
or officials who deci...
Very positive impact 1% 2% 1% 3%
Do not think San Fran- 11% 9% 11% 29%
cisco should prohibit Not sure 10% 11% 5% 31%
developers with pend-
ing decisions from co-
ntributing or fundraisi-
ng for officials who ...
Not sure 11% 13% 6% 30%
Party Party
Base Democr... Republic... Independe... Base Democr... Republic... Independe...
Ban on People With Those Seeking
Pending Decisions Approvals Told to
Writing Special Contribute to Specific
Checks Yes/No Candidates Level of
Concern
Think people who hav- 62% 60% 70% 66%
e pending decisions Very serious concerns 62% 61% 67% 60%
being made by public
Somewhat serious 21% 20% 20% 23%
officials should be ba-
nned from being able concerns
to write checks for ... Minor concerns 12% 15% 12% 7%
Do not think people w- 20% 23% 15% 17% No real concerns 3% 3% 1% 4%
ho have pending deci-
sions being made by Not sure 2% 1% 1% 6%
public officials should
be banned from being
able to write checks...
Not sure 17% 17% 15% 17%
Party Party
Base Democr... Republic... Independe... Base Democr... Republic... Independe...
Prohibit Contributions Pay-To-Play and
from Developers with Corruption Impact on
Pending Decisions Quality of Life
Yes/No
Very negative impact 62% 61% 55% 65%
Think San Francisco 78% 79% 69% 78%
Somewhat negative 23% 27% 19% 14%
should prohibit devel-
opers with pending d- impact
ecisions from contrib- Somewhat positive 4% 2% 10% 7%
uting or fundraising f- impact
or officials who deci...
Very positive impact 1% 1% 4% 1%
Do not think San Fran- 11% 9% 19% 13%
cisco should prohibit Not sure 10% 8% 11% 13%
developers with pend-
ing decisions from co-
ntributing or fundraisi-
ng for officials who ...
Not sure 11% 12% 12% 9%
Race
Hispani- Asian / Pacifi- African-
Base c / Lati... White c Islander Americ... Other
Brown Approval
Approve 70% 81% 70% 56% 82% 78%
Disapprove 16% 5% 24% 8% 6% 7%
Not sure 14% 15% 5% 37% 12% 15%
Race Race
Hispani- Asian / Pacifi- African- Hispani- Asian / Pacifi- African-
Base c / Lati... White c Islander Americ... Other Base c / Lati... White c Islander Americ... Other
Those Seeking Level of Concern
Approvals Told to About Conway
Contribute to Specific
Very serious concerns 56% 63% 64% 36% 42% 69%
Candidates Level of
Concern Somewhat serious 24% 19% 21% 39% 13% 14%
Very serious concerns 62% 70% 72% 35% 44% 78% concerns
Minor concerns 11% 5% 11% 13% 7% 14%
Somewhat serious 21% 10% 17% 38% 22% 9%
concerns No real concerns 3% 9% 3% 1% 3% 2%
Minor concerns 12% 18% 8% 17% 31% 2% Not sure 6% 5% 1% 11% 35% 1%
No real concerns 3% 1% 3% 5% 3% 2%
Not sure 2% - 0% 6% - 10%
Race
Hispani- Asian / Pacifi- African-
Base c / Lati... White c Islander Americ... Other
Ethics Investigation
Support/Oppose
Support 73% 61% 81% 50% 79% 87%
Oppose 7% 26% 6% 1% - 9%
Not sure 21% 13% 13% 48% 21% 4%
Age Age
18 to 46 to Older 18 to 46 to Older
Base 45 65 than ... Base 45 65 than ...
Brown Approval Ban Appointees From
Contributing to
Approve 70% 67% 71% 70%
Candidates Yes/No
Disapprove 16% 25% 10% 19% Think San Francisco 58% 60% 56% 60%
Not sure 14% 8% 19% 11% should ban appointee-
s from fundraising or
contributing to candi-
dates for election to
City Hall offices
Do not think San Fran- 24% 21% 23% 27%
cisco should ban app-
ointees from fundrais-
ing or contributing to
candidates for electio-
n to City Hall offices
Not sure 18% 20% 21% 13%
Age Age
18 to 46 to Older 18 to 46 to Older
Base 45 65 than ... Base 45 65 than ...
Level of Concern Ethics Investigation
About Conway Support/Oppose
Very serious concerns 56% 33% 64% 61% Support 73% 58% 78% 74%
Somewhat serious 24% 44% 17% 21% Oppose 7% 9% 5% 7%
concerns
Not sure 21% 32% 17% 19%
Minor concerns 11% 9% 11% 12%
No real concerns 3% 5% 2% 3%
Not sure 6% 9% 7% 3%