Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
WIAT–III Comments:
Copyright © 2009 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. Destiny Joann Villasenor
Produced in the United States of America. Page 1 of 5
Subtest Score Profile
Cumulative Percentages
The score is the same as or higher than the scores obtained by 25% of
students in the normative sample; 75% of students in the normative
Word Reading Speed sample scored higher than this score.
The score is the same as or higher than the scores obtained by 1% of
students in the normative sample; 99% of students in the normative
Pseudoword Decoding Speed sample scored higher than this score.
Copyright © 2009 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. Destiny Joann Villasenor
Produced in the United States of America. Page 2 of 5
Subtest Component Score Summary
Normal
Raw Standard Percentile Curve Qualitative
Subtest Component Score Score Rank Equivalent Stanine Description
Listening Comprehension
Receptive Vocabulary 10 97 42 46 5 Average
Oral Discourse Comprehension 11 87 19 32 3 Average
Sentence Composition
Sentence Combining 18 121 92 79 8 Above Average
Sentence Building 12 85 16 29 3 Average
Essay Composition
Word Count 45 93 32 40 4 Average
Theme Development and Text
Organization 3 85 16 29 3 Average
Oral Expression
Expressive Vocabulary 4 65 1 1 1 Low
Oral Word Fluency 33 113 81 68 7 Average
Sentence Repetition 10 74 4 13 2 Below Average
Copyright © 2009 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. Destiny Joann Villasenor
Produced in the United States of America. Page 3 of 5
Composite Score Profile
Copyright © 2009 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. Destiny Joann Villasenor
Produced in the United States of America. Page 4 of 5
Differences Between Composite Standard Scores
Critical Value Significant
(Significance Difference
Comparison Difference Level .01) Y/N Base Rate
Oral Language vs. Total Reading -6 12.15 N >15%
Oral Language vs. Basic Reading -8 11.74 N >15%
Oral Language vs. Reading Comprehension and Fluency -8 14.47 N >15%
Oral Language vs. Written Expression -9 14.07 N >15%
Oral Language vs. Mathematics -27 13.18 Y ≤5%
Oral Language vs. Math Fluency -8 13.71 N >15%
Total Reading vs. Basic Reading -2 7.24 N >15%
Total Reading vs. Reading Comprehension and Fluency -2 11.13 N >15%
Total Reading vs. Written Expression -3 10.61 N >15%
Total Reading vs. Mathematics -21 9.40 Y ≤15%
Total Reading vs. Math Fluency -2 10.12 N >15%
Basic Reading vs. Reading Comprehension and Fluency 0 10.68 N >15%
Basic Reading vs. Written Expression -1 10.13 N >15%
Basic Reading vs. Mathematics -19 8.85 Y >15%
Basic Reading vs. Math Fluency 0 9.62 N >15%
Reading Comprehension and Fluency vs. Written Expression -1 13.20 N >15%
Reading Comprehension and Fluency vs. Mathematics -19 12.24 Y ≤15%
Reading Comprehension and Fluency vs. Math Fluency 0 12.81 N >15%
Written Expression vs. Mathematics -18 11.77 Y ≤15%
Written Expression vs. Math Fluency 1 12.36 N >15%
Mathematics vs. Math Fluency 19 11.33 Y ≤10%
Note. A negative difference indicates that the second composite has a higher score than the first composite listed in the
comparison.
Copyright © 2009 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. Destiny Joann Villasenor
Produced in the United States of America. Page 5 of 5