Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
AUTHOR-->WORK-->LANGUAGE-->READER-->CONTEXT
Freudian Titles
“The Interpretation of Dreams,” “The Ego and the Id”, “The Psychopathology of Everyday Life”, “Civilization and
Its Discontents,” “Beyond the Pleasure Principle”
Character Analysis: psychoanalyzing characters as if they were real people (character pathology, this is what Freud does
with Hamlet). Discussing the unconscious forces that makes them act the way they do. Ex: Hemingway, Cat in the Rain.
Problem: characters are not people;
(Esp. combined with deconstruction)Psychoanalyzing form: Analyzing a text’s instabilities, the way multiple forces in it
(like instincts) compete for control. Ex: Poe’s “murder tales” or detective fiction as competition between the need to tell
(to express) and the need to conceal (to repress) or Peter Brooks’ (in Reading for the Plot, Design and Intention in
Narrative: Desire analysis of the dynamic structures of narrative forms, plot compared to life a death instincts); How is
the form of the text similar to the forces of the psyche?
(Esp. combined with reader-response): Psychoanalyzing readers: Re-examining a critic’s interpretation of a work and
identifying the unconscious forces that he/she projects onto that particular interpretation or psychoanalyzing ourselves
as readers (Norman Holland);
For a superb combination of psychoanalytic, deconstructive and reader-response criticism, see Shoshana
Felman’s “Turning the Screw of Interpretation” (Yale French Studies, no. 55/56, 1977):
https://www.academia.edu/8558505/Turning_the_Screw_of_Interpretation_Shoshana_Felman
Jacques Lacan
Combines psychoanalysis with structuralism: “the unconscious is structured like a language.” (Lacan) It’s not just a
disorganized and entangled mess, it has rules, a logical structure.
Displacement (metonymy), condensation (metaphor).
Notorious for his hard to read writing style.
Lacanian Titles
“Ecrits: the First Complete Edition in English”, “The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis”
The Mirror Stage: 6-18 months children start to recognize their image in the mirror; the beginning of subjectivity, of
the “I”;
The Imaginary (pre-Oedipal, pre-linguistic): contains the mirror stage, the infant or child does not perceive himself as
being different from the others (mother, father, siblings); Sense of completeness, unity, fullness.
The Law of the Father: basically the Oedipus complex in Freudian terms; disrupts the stage of the Imaginary and
marks the child’s entrance into the Symbolic;
The Symbolic order (linguistic): corresponds to the child’s entrance to the linguistic stage, similar to Freud’s idea of
the supergo, living according to norms, rules, patriarchy (Law of teh Father)
The Real (outside linguistic): different from reality; nature from which we have been severed and to which we can
never return; We cannot experience the real except through our own subjectivity and our own subjectivity is already
immersed in language;
The gaze: in the mirror stage the child discovers the gaze; the uncanny feeling of being looked back at when we look
at someone; we can never see the other as it is, we only see him/her/it from our own subjectivity: “you never look at
me from the place from which I see you” (Lacan).
Need(mirror stage: for milk, etc. Can be fulfilled), demand(Symbolic order, love, recognition, cannot be fully
satisfied),desire(more abstract concept, the desire of the unconscious, the analyst must seek out in search of this
desire, transference is essentially a “dead desire” that continues to live on);