Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
art ic l e i nf o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The invar36 alloy is suitable to produce mold of composite materials structure because it has similar
Received 2 June 2015 thermal expansion coefficient with composite materials. In the present paper, the MIG welding and laser-
Accepted 1 June 2016 MIG hybrid welding methods are compared to get the more appropriate method to overcome the poor
Available online 22 June 2016
weldability of invar36 alloy. According to the analysis of the experimental and simulated results, it has
Keywords: been proved that the Gauss and cone combined heat source model can characterize the laser-MIG hybrid
Invar36 alloy welding heat source well. The total welding time of MIG welding is 8 times that of hybrid laser-MIG
Hybrid laser-mig welding welding. The welding material consumption of MIG welding is about 4 times that of hybrid laser-MIG
MIG welding welding. The stress and deformation simulation indicate that the peak value of deformation during MIG
Simulation
welding is 3 times larger than that of hybrid laser-MIG welding.
& 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2016.06.001
0030-3992/& 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
76 X. Zhan et al. / Optics & Laser Technology 85 (2016) 75–84
2. Welding experiment
2.1. Equipment
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of laser-MIG hybrid welding. (a) KUKA welding robot (KR30HA) (b) Fronius welding machine (TPS-5000).
X. Zhan et al. / Optics & Laser Technology 85 (2016) 75–84 77
Table 1
Chemical composition of invar36 alloy.
Ni C Si Mn P S Cr Co Fe
35.5–36.5 r 0.01 r 0.2 0.2–0.4 r0.007 r 0.002 r 0.15 r 0.4 The Rest
Table 2 Table 3
Operational parameters of hybrid laser-MIG welding. Operational parameters of MIG welding.
Laser power (W) Current (A) Weld speed (mm/s) Voltage (V) Current (A) Weld speed (mm/s)
3. Numerical models
Fig. 8. The thermal physical parameters and mechanical parameters of the invar36 alloy.
Fig. 9. The comparisons between the experimental and simulated cross section.
welding and Gauss heat source represents the MIG welding. The The Gauss heat source model can be determined by:
combined heat source models of heat source are shown in Fig. 5.
The cone-shaped heat source model can be determined by: αQ p ⎡ α (x2 + y2 ) ⎤
Q s (x, y) = exp ⎢ − ⎥
9Q 0 1 ⎛ 3r 2 ⎞ πrs2 ⎣ rs2 ⎦ (2)
QV = ⋅ ⋅exp ⎜ − 2 ⎟
π 1 − e−3 ( z e − zi ) ( re2 + re ri + ri2)
( ) ⎝ rc ⎠ (1)
Among them, α means heat concentration factor, Q p means surface
Q 0 means the net heat flux and Q 0 = ηP . rc represents the heat heat power, rs means the effective radius.
z −z
distribution coefficient and rc = f (z ) = ri + (re − ri ) z −zi . The heat source of MIG welding is double ellipsoid heat source
e i
Among them, P means laser beam energy, η means efficiency model, whose model is shown in Fig. 6.
value, ze means the maximum radius, zi means the minimum radius. The double ellipsoid model can be determined by:
80 X. Zhan et al. / Optics & Laser Technology 85 (2016) 75–84
cell was used to mesh the model. The grid size was dense in the
weld to guarantee a more accurate simulation, while the grid size
far away from the weld was much coarser to save computing time.
Fig. 12. Validation of predicted and measured deformation fields of the invar plates. (a) Deformation fields of the invar plates after hybrid laser-MIG welding (b) Deformation
fields of the invar plates after MIG welding.
Fig. 13. Residual stress fields of invar plates after hybrid laser-MIG welding (Mises stress).
Fig. 14. Residual stress variation in the X direction after hybrid laser-MIG welding.
Fig. 15. Residual deformation fields of invar plates after hybrid laser-MIG welding.
hole, on the other side the laser improves the stability of arc, deformation fields of the invar plates from the numerical simu-
which leads to the energy density of laser-MIG welding bigger lation for hybrid laser-MIG welding and MIG welding were vali-
than that of MIG welding. dated as shown in Fig. 12. It can be observed that the experimental
and the predicted FE results match well for the MIG welding.
4.2. Comparison of residual stress and deformation
However the simulation results are slightly higher than the mea-
To ensure the reliability of the FE model, the weld deformation sured result of the laser-MIG welding. This difference between
of the invar plates after hybrid laser-MIG welding and MIG experiments and simulations could be due to the different heat
welding were validated with the experimental measurements. The losses between experiments and simulations.
82 X. Zhan et al. / Optics & Laser Technology 85 (2016) 75–84
Fig. 16. Residual deformation variation in the X direction after hybrid laser-MIG welding.
Fig. 17. Residual stress and deformation fields of invar plates after MIG welding.
Fig. 18. Residual stress and deformation variation in the X direction after MIG welding.
Fig. 19. Stress Comparison of MIG welding and hybrid laser-MIG welding. Fig. 20. Deformation Comparison of MIG welding and hybrid laser-MIG welding.
X. Zhan et al. / Optics & Laser Technology 85 (2016) 75–84 83
Based on the suitable simulation results, the three components root weld is 16 mm/s and the speed of cosmetic welding is 6 mm/
with different welding parameters (shown in Table 2 ) can be si- s. The total time of welding is 76 s. While the speed of root weld
mulated to study residual stress and deformation. The simulation and cap welding are 6 mm/s and 3 mm/s in MIG welding process.
result of residual stress fields of the three components after hybrid The total time of MIG welding is 608 s, which is 8 times that of
laser-MIG welding are shown in Figs. 13 and 14. The stress zone is hybrid laser-MIG welding.
very small, mainly concentrates in the weld zone, and the peak In summary, the hybrid laser-MIG welding has lower dis-
value of stress ranges from 170 MPa to 190 MPa. The value is far placement and higher efficiency.
below the yield strength of invar36 alloy, which means that the
welded components can meet the strength demand for aviation
dies manufacture. 5. Conclusion
The simulation result of the weld deformation fields of the
three components after hybrid laser-MIG welding are shown in In the present work, the following conclusions can be obtained:
Figs. 15 and 16. The peak value of deformation ranges from 0.5 mm
to 0.7 mm. Considering the dimensions of the components, this 1. The fusion line of simulation and experiment is similar, which
deformation is acceptable. reflects that the Gauss and cone combined heat source model
The corresponding parameters point out that the first pass laser can be used as the characterization of hybrid laser-MIG welding.
welding power takes a significant role to affect the residual and 2. The peak value of residual deformation of hybrid laser-MIG
deformation. The 5000 W laser power can produce lower residual welding and MIG welding are respectively 0.7 mm and 2.3 mm.
deformation, the reason may be that the heat input of the 5000 W The latter value is over 3 times that of the former.
is the smallest, and the deformation is the smallest, so the de- 3. The 19.05 mm thick invar plates are welded by MIG welding
formation depends more on heat input. However, the lowest re- with four multi passes and hybrid laser-MIG welding with three
sidual stress occurs with 5500 W laser power, it can indicate that multi passes. The total welding time of MIG welding is 8 times
the residual stress depends on not only the heat input but also the that of hybrid laser-MIG welding. So the hybrid laser-MIG
constraint condition. welding is more efficient.
The residual stress fields and weld deformation fields of the
components after MIG welding are shown in Figs. 17 and 18.
Compared with the hybrid laser-MIG welded components, the Acknowledgements
stress zone is much larger than the former and almost covers the
entire components. The peak value of weld deformation is up to The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the
2.3mm, more than 3 times that of the hybrid laser-MIG welding. project from the National Commercial Aircraft Manufacturing
The length of the experimental component is 200mm while the Engineering Technology Research Center Innovation Fund of China
length of actual mold is up to several meters. The value of weld (Grant no. SAMC14-JS-15-057) and the Project Funded of the
deformation will be very high if using MIG welding in actual Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Edu-
process. cation Institutions (PAPD).
Stress and deformation are the main concern of welding. Based
on the simulation results, Fig. 19 shows the comparison of stress of
different weld methods. The specimens are separated into three References
regions. RegionⅠand region Ⅲ symmetrically distribute on the edge
of the weld seam. In these regions, the stress of MIG welding is [1] W. Krenkel, F. Berndt, C/C–SiC composites for space applications and advanced
much higher than hybrid laser-MIG welding. In general, the stress friction systems, Mater. Sci. Eng. 412 (1) (2005) 177–181.
distribution of normal welded joint should be large stress value in [2] V.V. Vasiliev, A.F. Razin, Anisogrid composite lattice structures for spacecraft
and aircraft applications, Compos. Struct. 76 (1) (2006) 182–189.
the middle region and small stress value in the other regions. [3] E.F. Wassermann, New developments on the invar-effect, Phys. Scr. 1989 (T25)
However, in this analysis, MIG welded joint has high stress values (1989) 209.
in the region Ⅰand region Ⅲ. The reason may be that there is larger [4] G. Marsh, GKN Aerospace extends composites boundaries, Reinf. Plast. 50 (6)
(2006) 24–26.
restriction produced in MIG welding process than that in the hy- [5] G.H. Huang, D.M. Zhang, D.X. Yan, et al., Manufacturing technology research
brid laser-MIG and the stress fluctuation zone of MIG welded joint on invar steel mould, Adv. Aeronaut. Sci. Eng. 2 (4) (2012) 485–488.
is bigger than that of hybrid laser-MIG joint. As a result, the heat [6] Jirigalantu, Y.H. Zhang, Study on the welding technology of the heterogeneous
invar alloy, Weld. Join. 11 (2006) 37–39.
affect zone(HAZ) of MIG welding effect is much bigger than hybrid
[7] D.J. Wu, B. Yin, W.Z. Zhang, et al., Nd: YAG laser beam welding invar36 alloy,
laser-MIG welding. Region Ⅱ is the weld seam. The difference value Chin. J. Lasers 11 (2008) 024.
ΔE is about 80 MPa, and it is quite a large value. It indicates that [8] D. Wu, B. Yin, Q. Zhou, et al., Nd: YAG Laser beam welding invar36 alloy sheet,
the hybrid laser-MIG welding significantly affect the weld seam, Opt. Precis. Eng. 3 (2009) 019.
[9] J.L. Orbacho, J.C. Suárez, F. Molleda, Grain coarsening and boundary migration
for the heat input of hybrid laser-MIG welding is much more during welding of invar Fe-36Ni alloy, Mater. Charact. 41 (1) (1998) 27–34.
concentrated than MIG welding. The stress fluctuation in region Ⅱ [10] L. Zhao, J.C. Feng, X.Y. Tian, et al., Brazing of micrograin-filled quartz fiber
is observed in MIG welding, which means the MIG welding is not reinforced silica composites and Invar using Ag 21Cu 4.5Ti alloy, Chin. Sci. Bull.
(2011) 56, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4569-X.
so stable as hybrid laser-MIG welding. [11] Y.B. Chen, Modern Laser Welding Technology, Science Press, Beijing, 2005.
As for deformation, the distinctions between laser-MIG welding [12] Y. Zhao, Y.S. Sato, H. Kokawa, et al., Microstructure and properties of friction
and MIG welding are showed in Fig. 20. Alike the stress, the de- stir welded high strength Fe–36wt% Ni alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 528 (25)
(2011) 7768–7773.
formation is also separated into three region. The saltation of de- [13] Y. Zhao, A.P. Wu, J.L. Ren, et al., Temperature and force response characteristics
formation appears in the region Ⅱ(weld seam), so the weld width of friction stir welding on Invar 36 alloy, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 18 (3) (2013)
can be evidently observed in the figure. The saltation of MIG 232–238.
[14] B.K. Jasthi, W.J. Arbegast, S.M. Howard, Thermal expansion coefficient and
welding is much higher than that of laser-MIG welding, this may
mechanical properties of friction stir welded invar (Fe-36% Ni), J. Mater. Eng.
be caused by the increasing layers and passes in MIG welding. So Perform. 18 (7) (2009) 925–934.
the deformation of MIG welding is also much bigger than that of [15] R.S. Xiao, S.K. Wu, Progress on laser-arc hybrid welding, Chin. J. Lasers 11
hybrid laser-MIG welding. (2008) 007.
[16] D. Fan, B. Dong, S. Yu, et al., Technology features and progress of laser-arc
The welding efficiency is very important in the actual produc- hybrid welding, Hot Work. Technol. 11 (2011) 051.
tion process. During the hybrid laser-MIG welding, the speed of [17] M. Ono, Y. Shinbo, A. Yoshitake, et al., Development of laser-arc hybrid
84 X. Zhan et al. / Optics & Laser Technology 85 (2016) 75–84
welding, NKK Tech. Rev. (2002) 70–74. kW class YAG laser application for heavy components, SPIE High-Power Lasers
[18] J. Matsuda A. Utsumi, TIG or MIG Arc Augmented Laser Welding of Thick Mild Manuf. 3888 (1999) 543–550.
Steel Plate. [22] N. Blundell, J. Biffin, T. Johnson, High speed augmented laser welding of thin
[19] P.Q. Xu, J.W. Ren, P.L. Zhang, et al., Analysis of formation and interfacial WC sheet metals, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 8 (3) (2000) 328–420.
dissolution behavior of WC-Co/invar laser-TIG welded joints, J. Mater. Eng. [23] G. Li, M. Gao, C. Chen, et al., Characterisation comparison of laser and laser-arc
Perform. 22 (2) (2013) 613–623. hybrid welding of Invar 36 alloy, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 19 (1) (2014) 30–37.
[20] C. Schinzel, B. Hohenberger, F. Dausinger, H. Hugel, Laser welding of aluminum [24] W.S. Park, M.S. Chun, M.S. Han, et al., Comparative study on mechanical be-
car bodies – from research to production, Proc. ICALEO Sec. 1998, vol. 85, pp. havior of low temperature application materials for ships and offshore
56–65. structures: Part I-Experimental investigations, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528 (2011)
[21] T. Ishide, S. Tsubota, M. Nayama, Y. Shimokusu, T. Nagashima, K. Okimura, 10 5790–5803.