Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Name:
College:
Tutor:
Course:
Date:
Introduction
In the global marketplace of today, many leaders, executives, and managers are
concerned with building trust with their employees and clients (Buble, Juras, & Matić, 2014).
However, many fail in this endeavor because of failure to realize that there is a direct correlation
between having an internal culture of trust and transparency and better performance. In fact,
TRANSPARENCY IN ORGANIZATIONS 2
many leaders are faced with the challenge of maintaining the right degree of transparency within
their organization with many going towards two extremes. Some leaders operate their
organizations with an open-book management style while others believe in carefully maintaining
the security of information. The primary aim of this paper is to discuss the appropriate use of
transparency in organizations. I will express my opinions on what the most appropriate level of
transparency for an organization is, identify instances in which transparency would not be a good
innovation and heightened performance. They have detailed how organizations that have a
transparent culture are overwhelmingly more successful and share a common purpose and goals
across all employee levels. They have shown that lack of transparency, which is about
organizations operating in secrecy, can arouse suspicion and distrust, and thus declined
productivity. They posit that there is a need for a balance between the two extremes of workplace
Schnackenberg and Tomlinson (2016) who posit that the appropriate level of transparency is one
that promotes positive perceptions. In this line of thinking, then, the appropriate level of
transparency is one that leaders can capitalize on to foster the perceptions of fairness and
honesty.
Instances when transparency would not be a good strategy
While transparency is associated with an array of benefits, there are numerous instances
where transparency would not be a good idea, meaning that information would have to be
instances where disclosure of information would lead to more harm to the organization, its
TRANSPARENCY IN ORGANIZATIONS 3
operations, and the people it supports (Schnackenberg & Tomlinson, 2016). For example, let us
health of the nation’s veterans. In such a situation, transparency would not be an ideal strategy as
such information would be open to consistent assessment when made available to employees. In
another instance, a publically traded company full disclosure of how and where some
appropriated funds are used may lead to inadvertent risk exposures that may jeopardize normal
operations.
In some organizations, team member share and managers meet regularly, inform them
about what is going on and why, and then respond to their various queries. But managers who
think that true employee involvement can be achieved through such efforts are unlikely to
achieve anything other than a “quick and short-lived fix “for their organization woes
(Schnackenberg & Tomlinson, 2016). The situations where transparency would not be a good
strategy are while implementing changes in the organizations or of downsizing of the employee.
When the employees are aware of the changes to be taken place, there will be resistance from
them and this will lead the managers to change their decision. Same is the case for downsizing in
the company. When the company is facing loss and in desperate need of cutting cost, they often
think of downsizing. This decision will again face resistance as no one want to lose their jobs.
behaviors, and thus an impact on how s/he can influence his or her followers and subordinates.
With the right amount of transparency, a leader can better succeed in gaining trust and
commitment from all employee levels in his or her organization (Buble, Juras, & Matić, 2014).
Subsequently, this affects motivation, innovation, and overall productivity. Therefore, leaders can
TRANSPARENCY IN ORGANIZATIONS 4
use transparency to influence positive attitudes in employees towards their work and the goals
Conclusion
On average, organizations lose forty percent of the potential financial value of their
strategies due to poor performance and talent management of their employees. Thus, it is
necessary to have alignment of individual goals with that of the organizations. Unless employees
are motivated, the alignment of organizational and individual goals will not optimize the
motivational level. An individual’s performance becomes more evident with greater level of
transparency. Transparent goals are critical for an employee to understand how his or her own
goals and performance relate to those of other employees. There is no globalized model for
transparency and it depends on the leaders. It depends how the leader fosters transparency in the
References
Brunner, M., & Ostermaier, A. (2017). Peer influence on managerial honesty: the role of
193.
Schnackenberg, A. K., & Tomlinson, E. C. (2016). Organizational transparency: A new