Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
Demonetisation
Module 13.1
Contemporary Themes in India’s
Economic Development and the Economic Survey
1
Overview
• Objective and Background
• Markers of Success
2
Source: NDTV, DD
17/06/17 Demone-sa-on and other Metachallenges (Module 14) 3
Demonetization – The Beginning
1. On 8th November 2016 Prime Minister Narendra Modi
announced that two of India’s largest notes INR 500 and INR
1000 will cease to be legal tender except for a few purposes
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Growth in average currency with public (%, yoy)
2010
2012
2014
2016
2017
Go back
5
Cash shortages for some time
6
Objectives of demonetization
To prevent/curb:
• Accumulation of ‘black money’ generated through income that was not
declared to the tax authorities
• Corruption
• Currency counterfeiting
8
What is black money?
Origin vs Function
Origin/nature
White Black
Function
Company pays employee salary Small enterprise pays for
Transactions in cash; payment and receipt are input in cash; neither
declared to tax authorities declares the transaction to
tax authorities
Store of value Household keeps savings in cash Businessman hoards
for emergencies undeclared cash, with a view
to distributing it to his
candidate during elections
9
Cash-to-GDP ratio in India is quite high and
higher than that for comparable countries
.25
Currency in Circulation as proportion of GDP
.2
.15
India
.1
.05
0
6 8 10 12
Log of GNIpc PPP*(Atlast Method Current $ 2015)
0%
Indonesia
Mexico
South Africa
China
Japan
Brazil
United States
United Kingdom
India
12
HDN used mostly for transactions
purposes?
Highest Denomina.on as propor.on of GDP per capita (2015)
1,000
0.045
1,000
Lower Middle Upper Middle
0.040
5,000
High Income
5,000
Income Income
0.035
0.030
500
0.025
500
5,00,000
1,000
0.020
500
5,00,000
1,000
500
1,000
5,000
0.015
1,000
1,000
5,000
1,000
1,00,000
1,000
10,000
20,000
20 1,000
1,000
100
100
1,000
1,000
0.010
200
100
1,00,000
100
500
10,000
100 100
100
100 100
20,000
20
1,000
1,000
100
1,000
200
100
100
500
100
0.005
0.000
Note: Numbers above bars are high denomination notes in Local Currency Units
13
Estimates of black money
• Estimates based on soil rates
14
Broader analytics of demonetization
Go back
16
Costs and Benefits – Expected Effects
(1/2)
Sector Short-Run Long-Run
Cash will recover but settle at a lower
Cash has declined sharply
level
Bank deposits have increased
Moderate increase in bank deposits
sharply
RBI's currency liabilities have RBI's balance sheet will shrink, if it
fallen, liabilities to commercial declares outstanding notes will no
Money/ interest rate banks have increased longer be redeemed
Money multiplier will rise as bank
Broad money essentially
lending increases; broad money
unchanged
effects will depend on RBI response
Loan rates should fall, as the durable
Interest rates on cash will rise but
increase in deposits creates new
other interest rates will decline
lending capacity
Financial System Savings Increase Increase
Unaccounted income/black Stock of black money will fall as Flow should decrease because of
money holders get caught in the tax net formalization
Digital transactions have
Formalization/digitalization Further increases
increased sharply
17
Costs and Benefits – Expected Effects
(2/2)
Sector Short-Run Long-Run
Private sector wealth will decline, to the
extent that high denomination notes are not
returned, while real estate prices fall
Wealth
Government/RBI's wealth will increase
because unreturned cash will reduce
liabilities
Prices will decline, as wealth declines and Prices could rise if evasion of stamp
Real estate
cash shortages impede transactions duty/capital gains tax becomes difficult
Will decline, as demand (cash, private
Could be beneficial in the long run:
wealth) and supply (reduced liquidity and
greater formalization, less corruption
working capital) fall
GDP
Informal output could decline but
Cash-intensive sectors (agriculture, real
recorded GDP would increase as
estate, jewelry) likely to be affected more
economy is more formalized
Will decline as growth slows, partially offset Increase, as formalization expands
Tax collections
as tax net snares black money and compliance improves
Will be strengthened if demonetization
is accompanied by complementary
Credibility measures. Will be undermined if re-
monetization is slow and if tax
18
arbitrariness and harassment increase
Digitalization – upward trend in digital transactions
across all three types of consumers
Digitally Excluded Affluent Customers
AEPS Total and Approved Transactions (Rs. Credit Card + Debit Card + PPI (Rs. thousand
Crore) crore)
6 70
65
4
60
2 55
0 50
45
40
0 0
02-Nov-16
07-Nov-16
12-Nov-16
17-Nov-16
22-Nov-16
27-Nov-16
02-Dec-16
07-Dec-16
12-Dec-16
17-Dec-16
22-Dec-16
27-Dec-16
01-Jan-17
06-Jan-17
11-Jan-17
16-Jan-17
02-Nov-16
07-Nov-16
12-Nov-16
17-Nov-16
22-Nov-16
27-Nov-16
02-Dec-16
07-Dec-16
12-Dec-16
17-Dec-16
22-Dec-16
27-Dec-16
01-Jan-17
06-Jan-17
11-Jan-17
16-Jan-17
6
• Early signs are evident as
weighted average of real estate 4
-2
2014 Q1
2014 Q2
2014 Q3
2014 Q4
2015 Q1
2015 Q2
2015 Q3
2015 Q4
2016 Q1
2016 Q2
2016 Q3
2016 Q4
Source: Knight Frank data and Survey calculations
20
Assessing the short-term macro-economic Impact
• Demonetisation is:
-5
Growth in Indirect Taxes (YoY Growth in Automobile Sales (YoY,
25
monthly & cumulative, %) %) -10
Excise
Service 15
Non-Customs Indirect Tax -15
Jan-15
Mar-15
May-15
Jul-15
Sep-15
Nov-15
Jan-16
Mar-16
May-16
Jul-16
Sep-16
Nov-16
Excise w/o ARM
Service tax w/o ARM 5
-5
Two wheelers
-15
Medium & Heavy Commercial Vehicles (RHS)
Jan-16
Jul-15
Sep-15
Nov-15
Mar-16
May-16
Jul-16
Sep-16
Nov-16
Jan-15
Mar-15
May-15
Jul-15
Sep-15
Nov-15
Jan-16
Mar-16
May-16
Jul-16
Sep-16
Nov-16
22
The Quantity Theory of Money – Theory
MV = PY, where
• For example, a reduction in cash in circulation (or cash in hand) implies that
across the value chain of goods and services production, transactions that
were in cash will either have to be on credit or not occur
23
Quantity Theory of Money – Operationalization
Two conceptual issues to be considered to operationalize this equation:
25
Assumptions for projecting currency with public
Replenishment Cycle:
November:
• Rs. 3.2 lakh crore replenished by 30th November (72 percent Rs. 2000 notes, 6
percent Rs. 500 and rest in small denominations
December
• Rs. 2 lakh crore available in stock for disbursal in December (75 percent Rs.
2000 notes and 25 percent Rs. 500)
• Rs. 0.5 lakh crore injected from RBI’s reserve stock of money in December
• Rs. 1.4 lakh crore printed and injected in addition
January onwards: Rs. 1.4 lakh crore printed and injected every month starting
January (for December this is in addition to above figures) 26
Re-monetization timeline
Effective Currency in Circulation as a proportion of Estimated Transactions Demand
120%
110% 110%
Historic velocity change
95% confidence intervals
103%
101%
100% 100%
99%
95%
93%
90% 91%
88% 88%
84% 84%
82%
80% 81%
79% 78%
75% 76%
73% 72%
70% 70%
68%
65% 65%
62%
60%
8-Nov-16 End-Nov 2016 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17
27
Real GDP Growth Forecasts (y-o-y %)
8
0
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2016-17 2017-18
28
Excess liquidity increased sharply after demonetization
but has not been eliminated even after 7 months……...
400
Liquidity (Daily LAF)
300
Liquidity Shortage
200
Demonetisation
Demonetisation
100
overly tight liquidity
Rs thousand crore
0
-100
overly tight liquidity
Excess Liquidity
-200
-300
-400
-500
-600
01-Jan-15
05-Feb-15
12-Mar-15
16-Apr-15
08-Oct-15
21-Jan-16
25-Feb-16
31-Mar-16
27-Oct-16
21-May-15
25-Jun-15
30-Jul-15
03-Sep-15
12-Nov-15
17-Dec-15
05-May-16
09-Jun-16
14-Jul-16
18-Aug-16
22-Sep-16
01-Dec-16
16-Mar-17
25-May-17
20-Apr-17
05-Jan-17
09-Feb-17
..so that short-term rates still below policy rates
7.00
Call below repo
6.50
6.00
5.50
Demonetisation
5.00
4.00
10 Feb 2017
1 Apr 2016
6 May 2016
10 Jun 2016
15 Jul 2016
19 Aug 2016
23 Sep 2016
28 Oct 2016
2 Dec 2016
6 Jan 2017
17 Mar 2017
21 Apr 2017
Markers of Success
• Increased digitalization or a decrease in prominence of
cash as a means of transactions
31
Maximizing LT gains and minimizing ST costs
• Faster remonetization will reduce the duration of currency crunch and
enable faster economic recovery
32
Complement demonetization with measures
to reduce incentives for tax evasion
• GST with broad coverage to include activities that are sources of black
money creation—land and other immovable property—should be
implemented
• Individual income tax rates and real estate stamp duties could be reduced
35
From Socialism without Entry to
Capitalism/ Marketism without Exit
• The Indian economy has embraced the spirit of the market,
dismantling the ‘Licence-Quota-Permit Raj’.
36
37
The Theory
• A market economy requires free entry of new firms, ideas, and technologies so that
factors of production are guided to most productive uses.
• But Exit must to entice resources away from inefficient deployment: Joseph
Schumpeter: ‘the gale of creative destruction’.
• Problem in public and private sectors, and all economic sectors: Civil aviation,
Agriculture, Welfare Schemes, Public sector banks & companies, Infrastructure,
Discoms, Regulatory bodies, Labour, Small Savings
38
Magnitude of the problem
• Good firms don’t grow large enough over time and bad ones stick
around for too long.
• Average 40 year plant only 1.5 times larger than a new one in India.
• Thick tail of badly run firms.
Average employment of old & new Average employment of old &
plants in India, Mexico & US new plants in India, FY1999 & FY2010
39
Source: Hsieh and Klenow (2014).
Costs of Lack of Exit
• Fiscal Costs: Government supports inefficient firms/banks-
explicit (bailouts) or implicit (loans).
40
Examples
41
1. Civil Aviation: Air India
• The erstwhile pride of India today has a negative price.
395
400
332
300 278
202
200
133
100 78
22
0
2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
42
2. Agriculture:Lack of Exit from Cereals
Change in Acreage under Important Progression of Per Capital Income
Crops (Area in ‘000 Ha) relative to 1980
600
550 Gujarat
500 Haryana
450 Maharashtra
400
Punjab
350
Tamil Nadu
300
Uttar Pradesh
250
200
150
100
50
1980-81 1990-91 2000-2001 2010-11 2013-14
43
3. Policy persistence: Government Schemes
Distribution of centrally sponsored and central sector
schemes by duration (in years)
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Duration of the scheme as of 2015-16
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-0.1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
46
Why no Exit?
47
Why no Exit? Interests
• Interests: Concentrated producer interests (farmers, trade unions)
vis-à-vis dispersed consumer interests and unrepresented (because
unborn) future interests.
• The former will have the incentive and the financial ability to mobilize
more easily.
48
Why no Exit? Some Weak Institutions
• Weak Institutions: They hamper or increase costs of exit.
• Banks finding it hard to exit bad loans, private firms unable to exit bad balance sheets. Hence Larger
recourse to DRTs but with dismal results.
50
-50
49
Why no Exit? Some Strong Institutions
• Strong ‘Referee’ Institutions: Critical for democracy, but functioning a
difficult balancing act so as to not impede calculated risk-taking.
• 4 Cs:
• Courts.
50
Why no Exit? Ideology
• Difficult to phase out entitlements.
• ‘Sanctification of the Small’
• Political difficulties: Perception of favouring the private sector.
51
Solutions
• Avoid exit through liberal entry: aviation and telecom.
• Transparency: explicitly advertise the costs of bad programs like fertilizer subsidy.
52
India’s Meta-challenges:
The Precocious,
Cleavaged Democracy
53
Overview
• Meta-challenges: Not about today but entire history
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
China
2011
2012
2013
India
2014
2015
Openness to Trade
Trade to GDP
0 .5 1 1.5 2
14
16
MYS
18
lnP
THA
DEU
Log Population
JPA
BRA
20
USA
Trade to GDP and Log Population
IDN IND
22
CHN
55
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
CHL
PER
BRA
BGR
MYS
UKR
CHN
POL
MEX
IDN
IND
ROM
TUR
ARG
ZAF
THA
PHL
Capital Inflow % of GDP
RUS
(Average of 2011 to 2015)
BGD
VEN
PAK
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
2012-13:Q1
2012-13:Q2
2012-13:Q3
2012-13:Q4
2013-14:Q1
2013-14:Q2
Openness to Foreign Capital
2013-14:Q3
2013-14:Q4
2014-15:Q1
2014-15:Q2
2014-15:Q3
FDI Inflows (USD Bn, LHS)
2014-15:Q4
FDI Inflow in India
2015-16:Q1
2015-16:Q2
2015-16:Q3
2015-16:Q4
2016-17:Q1
2016-17:Q2
56
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
Size of Government: Macro
Expenditure to GDP Ratio and Log GDP Per Capita
60
Fin
Fra Den
Bel
Atr
50 Ita Swe
Hun
Gce
Por
Cro
Expenditure to GDP Ratio
Slo
Ukr IceNet Nor
Ecu MtaSpa Ger
Bol Ven
PolSRPCze UK Lux
IsrJap
Cyp
40
Bra Can
Egy Bul Rus
Arg Est Ire
TurLat Aus
US
Rom Lit Nzl
Uzb
SA Bot Uru Swi
30
Cos Kor
Phi Indo Dom
Ira
Ban
Nig
10
8 9 10 11 12
Log GDPlpc_gdp
Per Capita
57
Size of Government: Micro
(Public Sector Enterprise Share of GNI)
4%
24% Sales Profit
21% 3%
18%
2%
15%
12% 1%
9%
0%
6% India Malaysia China Russia Brazil South Indonesia
3% Africa
0%
China India Russia Brazil Indonesia South
Africa
150% 55%
Assets 50% Market Value
125% 45%
40%
100% 35%
30%
75% 25%
50% 20%
15%
25% 10%
5%
0% 0%
China Malaysia India Russia Brazil Indonesia South Malaysia China Russia India Brazil Indonesia South
Africa Africa
58
Solid, Remarkable Growth Performance
• Since 1980, and especially 1991, India steadily reforming
• Indian GDP has grown at 4.5% per capita for 35+ years, only 3
uninterrupted democracies have done better in the post war period (Japan,
Israel and Botswana)
59
1.Ambivalence about: Embracing Private
Sector and Protecting Property Rights
• Retrospective actions
• Civil aviation
• Strategic disinvestments
61
2.State Capacity/Delivering Essential Services
• “Flailing State” with exceptions: PDS (Chattisgarh), power (Gujarat) etc.
• GST experience: Few political voices for low and simple rates
63
Possible Explanations
• Precocious, cleavaged democracy, shaking off colonial chains will
distrust private capital
64
“Precocious” India : Premature
Pressures to Spend
Income level at which country governments spent 27% of GDP
(what India spent in 2010)
65
Voting age population (million)
and ratio of tax-returns to Number of taxpayers to voting
voting population (Per cent) age population (Per cent)
66
Few taxpayers, low tax compliance
Taxpayers to voting age population and log per-capita GDP controlling for democracy
.6
Den
Nor
Pol
Swe
Can
.4
Est
Vie
Taxpayers to voting age population
Por Hun
Net
AusSlo
Bel
Fra
.2
Mal
Tur UK
Ire
-.4
Isr
Ind Cyp
-2 -1 0 1
Log per-capita GDP controlling for democracy
67
Ideas Ideas Ideas !!!
• Ambivalence/Ineffective redistribution/ineffective state-capacity.
• “[T]he ideas of economists and political philosophers, both when they are
right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is commonly
68
Recommended Readings
• Chapter 1, Economic Survey, 2015-16
69