Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
DUO TRIO
Dr. Hardoko
FAKULTAS PERIKANAN DAN ILMU KELAUTAN
UNIVERSITAS BRAWIJAYA
® Triangle test
- Panelist receives three coded samples
- 2 of the samoles ::-: , 1 different
- Task: identify the odd sample
- often used for selecting panelist
- analysis of result based on probabiety ¢ P-
odd sample 1 /3 if no detectable diff.
- Count the number of correct replies ~
refer to Table 1 •
- levels of siqniticance s q not indicate that
the diff. is > but that there is less
probability of saying there is a diff. when in
~ r fact there is none.
Comments:
- Prepare equal number of the six possible
comb. ABB,BAA,AAB,BBA, ABA and BAB
~ present at random
Examples: ·
A triangle test was used to determine if
there was a detectable diff. b/w fish-potato
flakes processed under 2 diff. sets of cond.
I: judge== 12
Number of samples required:
Treatment A <>Code 314: 6
Code 542: 12 ............
Treatment 8 <> Code 628: 12
Code 14Sr. 6 ~
- Result: 9 judges correctly identify the odd
sarnples e Tablet= significant diff. at 1%
level
APPENDIX II
-
STATISTICAL CHART 1
Triangle lest
Two-11ample re sr , diHerence analysis.
Number number o( concurring choices number o( correct answers
o( necessary 10 catnblish ncccssar)· 10 c•tobl i11t.
1a11tere •ignificanc<e sisniflcance
• •• ••• • •• • ••
1
2
3 3
4 4
5 5 5
6 6 5 6
7 7 5 6 7
8 8 8 6 7 8
9 -a 9 6 -' 8
9
10 9 10 7 8
1I 10 II II -8
I 8 10
10
12 10 lI 12 9
13 II 12 13 8 9 l1
14 12 I'3 14 9 10 II
15 12 13 12
1-l 9 10
I5 9 ll 12
16 10 II 13
12 13
17
I7
10
II ,, I4
18 II !3 I4
19 12 13 15
19 12 l .• 15
20 12 I I 16
21 13 15 16
21
..
13
22 17 18
23 I7 19
2-l 18 19
2.5 18 20
26 19 "0 "'" 15 17
Second method for triangle :
• Used Chart 2. Triangle test
X = No. corect judgments - 9
n = No judgment / panelist 12
Value from chart (x,n) = 0.004
0.004 < = 0,01 Sign diff
Statistical Chort 2 Trlanglo test, probobility or :r or more correct judgments in 11 trll\ls (onc·t11Ued, p : 113)"
•,
• 0
•
C!CI
001
~:
00,
~
co,
01:
Oil
~
(Ill
~,
6H
011
O'II
·~
111
13.I M:
Sl t'<>I
C.."'l ~I
::!O CC: 001
::I.)
:a, 003 001
00$ 001 001
- - -· ....
-
• Jn,tlal dt(1mal J>('int hrut ll~•n omi•tcd
.. ·' ,,,_,.
...... ,
@ Duo-trio test
- 3 samples are presented, 1 is labeled R
(reference) and the other two are coded.
- One coded sample is identical with R and
the other is different.
- Panelist is asked to identify the odd
sample.
- Duo-trio test has the same appf ication as
the triangle-test but is less efficient m,.. P of
selecting correct sample by chance is
50°/o.
- often used when tasting samples that have
strong flavor ~ fess tasting req. ,
- it can be used in place of the paired comp.
test if no char. is specified.
* simple paired comp. test:
? sample has more of some specified
char.
* triangle or duo-trio test:
judgment based on any diff. he can
detect
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR
DUO-TRIO TEST
Name Date
------ ------
Product -----
Instruction:
On your tray you have a marked control
sample (R) and two coded samples. One
sample is identical with R and the other is
different. Which of the coded samples is
different from R?
Samples Check odd sample
432
701
Comments:
- Example:
.A duo-trio test was used to determine if
· methional could be detected when added to
cheddar cheese in amounts of 0.125 ppm
and 0.250 ppm.
Duo-trio was used in preference to the
triangle test<> less tasting to form a
judgment, important when tasting a
substance with a Hngering aftertaste, ex.
· methional.
.
Each tray: 1 R, one coded samples with
methional added and one with no methional.
Test was performed on 2 successive days
using Jl,jf.dges. .
Each day o presented 2 trays·
a. 1 sample with 0.125-Pr:?W"m~thional, 2 RCodtd
b. 1 sample with 0~50 PPm methional, 2 .R: c.o"'1d
Total judgments ={If 6
o.. 125 ppm = ·1 O out of 16 correct
0.250 ppm = 14 out of 16 correct
Consult Table 1. + 14 correct judgments are
t/, significant at the 1 % level, but 10 correct
· judqrnents are not sign. even at 5% level.
So, methional added can be detected at the
· 0.250 ppm level. -
•®) ••@
~l ~ ~ (,//e'
I •
1 .
~)(·_..
~ If. I I
).'"'
11
[tl ortcpS.doc in uph ~ fiJ!i. ~ 60
I
l}!) - - - o, }J ~ o~
,I,
70 ,()~
J, ..
(...., ~
,._,
s;t"- b-1 r
·~
I
.~
t,1bF ft"°· t:P ff ·
Teble G.6.e. ~1fnimum Number• ol Correct
Judsments £:scabllsh S,g.nlrtcance
•O •• V•rlou.s
ProbabllltyLevels for Pai.rod·Comperison and
Duo-Trio Tcsr• (onc·t•slcd. p - \,IS,)
.. ,ob4,b• .. '.., ... "9 ••
. .. .,.. ,''"'
No of
0 °," 0 04 0 03
,
o.o:,
,
001
,
0005 0 001
----
,
• ..
7
•..
7
• • .•. •
1•
10
• • • 10 0 10
1 1 .. • 10 ,o 10 • 1 • 1
1,
L)
14
15
1e
,o
,o
,••
,,
,o
•1
1 1
.,.
,2
10
•1
I 1
1,
13
10
•1
12
,2
13
1 •
12
12
l3
14
1 1
1,
1 :l
1 ::,
14
.
12
•3
14
1S
:,
•• ••
.... •7
.
1, 13
,3
1 ::, 13 1• ,s
t4
,
•• 1 .. 1 ..
15
,s
•& IS
,s ,s 16
•• •• •• .
:o
,, 115
,
.•.• •e
•• 15
18 t7
••
1a
••
.. . ..
,,
2, ,a •• ••
1'
..
17 18 13 :o
23 1G
e ,, ,, 20 21
. ..
:t4
17 ,e •• 19 20
,. 18
•• 11> 1 ;,
...
20 20 22
, • ••
:78 10 ::o
70 20 2, 22
, .
,a ,e 18 111
•
27
20 21 2, 23
,0
,o
,, ,, ,
:79 20 ,1 71 :!':>' -:,2 24
, ,,
30
20
2, .-2 23
,,
3. 21 2, 22 :>• 25
32 22 22 ,:,
2• 24 28
,.
33 22 23 23 23 2• :,5 ::re
38 :74 :74 2
:,5 25
=·
, ,, ,..
,.
35 23 :.•
,,. ,,
,..
24
S 2S 27 28
37 26 ::PG 2G
30 ,s
78 26 "~ ""
,..
28 27
,.
:, 7 -
27
,.. ,c
X>
:,::r
:JO
41 :;7 27 27 2a 29 ,o :, 1
42 27 28
3 28 ::re :a 1 >2
..... 20 :JO
28 29 29 30 31 :a 1 :a:a
...
•8
45
:o
29
30
30
21>
30
:JO
:JO
31
31
:,o
31
:J2
31
32
33
>2
33
3•
34
35
48 31 31 31 32 3:J >• 38
49 31 32 :J2 33 34 3• 38
50 3:7 32 33 33 34 35 37
••
00
80 ...
37 38
49
38
49
39
so
•o
"" 52
•3
...
55
6
,
e
a9
JO
11
12
ll
14
16
II
17
ta
"
20
21
:.l
~
21
;;5
31
~-
:l1
2'
30
31
llZ
»
:IS
:36.,
I
39
40
41
.,
42
,••S,
•,•1
IO
Instructions
1. Bofore laking this tost. familiariz.o yoursGU
with th• flavor of the sample$ •A• and ·Nol A•
which are av:.na.ble from the •ttondant.
Sample
.,.,.
The sample Is: Sample
.,.,.
Tho sample ts:
0 D 6 0 0
2 D 0 7 0 0
3 8 D 0
0 0
9
4
a D 0 D
5 D a 10 a D
Comment•:
An:llyie mutts - In the t.able below, the columns show how the samples were presented and
the rows. how the subjects identified them:
Subjcd
received
A ot A Total
Sllbp:s s11d A 60 3S 9S
NOlA 40 6.5 IOS
Tow 100 100 200
which is greater than the value m Table T5 (df = I. a-risk= 0 05. z1= 3.84), i.e., a significant
difference exists.
@ Two-o.ut-of-ilive test
-Use this method when only a small number
of panelist is avatlable (ex. 10)
-More effic·ieftlt stat,istica~,~ ( 1 : 10)
-P rocedare:
1. Present to each panelist five coded
samples.
2. lns(lr-wct panelist that two sampfes belong
to one type afilai ttilr-ee to another
Or Chart 5.
St.at.is<.ical Chari.. 5 l">robability or x or 01orc correct. judgm#'nt.s
a ... n t.rinls
.. ,, x
l
or a t.wo-o ... t-of'"-Civc t.csl.
2 3 1 r,
-c
(one-tailed, P =
7 8 ~ IQ
fl.J.}'"
I I 12 I:$
2 1:>0 010
3 271 0?8 001
4 344 052 004
5 410 081 009
6 4b9 I 14 016 001
7 522 J.50 026 003
8 57n 187 038 005
9 6J3 ?.25 053 008 001
10 651 26-4 070 013 002
I J 696 303 090 019 003
12 7.18 341 l. .l I 026 oo: 001
13 746 379 134 034 006 001
14 77t ! J5 158 Q44 009 001
J.S 794 451 184 056 OJ~ 002
If; 815 485 211 068 017 o~ 001
•7 833 518 238 083 022 OC?!, 001
18 850 550 2GG 098 028 006 OOJ.
19 865 580 296 115 035 009 002
~o S78 608 323 13S 043 0-1 J. 002
21. 891 635 352 152 052 014 003 001.
22 S02 661 380 172 (162 OHJ C04 001
23 !I I 1 6$5 408 193 073 023 006 001
:i:4 920 708 436 214 085 028 007 002
25 928 729 463 236 098 033 009 002
26 !>35 749 489 ~9 1!2 040 012 ocs OQI
27 942 167 515 262 127 047 015 004 OOJ
:es 948 785 54 l 305 162 1)55 018 0<>5 001
29 953 801 565 3!!9 1SIJ OC4 1)22 006 002
30 :::,59 816 589 353 175 073 OZG 008 ~2
31 962 830 611 S76 19:'\ 083 03l_ 010 003 001
!,2 Sfi6 844 633 400 2:ti u94 036 0-12 003 001
33 969 856 C-54 423 230 IOo 042 014 OC4 001
34 972 867 674 446 250 119 048 Ol.7 005 001
35 975 878 694 469 263 J:,2 oss 020 006 002
36 S77 St>7 7!.2 49l 289 145 Ot?3 02<1 008 002 001
37 980 8:)6 730 fi14 309 160 07l 027 009 003 00-1
38 982 905 7.C:::6 535 ~o 175 080 032 011 003 001
39 984 912 762 SSG 350 190 089 037 01.S 004 001
40 985 920 777 :';77 371 206 100 042 015 005 001
4J 987 926 791 597 392 223 1: 1.0 o-se 038 006 002
42 988 9~2 805 616 412 240 121 ()!'.;< 02?. 007 002 OCJ
43 989 938 818 635 433 257 13S 051. 024 009 OC3 001
44 990 943 830 653 453 27< 146 068 028 010 003 oo•
45 991 948 841 671 473 292 159 076 032 OJ.2 004 001
4n 992 952 852 688 49',S 310 -172 084 036 014 005 002
47 993 956 862 70-1 5,2 329 186 093 04.l. 016 OOG 002 ('10 I
48 99< 960 871 720 531 3'17 200 102 C\.C:::6 0-19 007 002 00 I
4~ .994 963 880 ";'35 550 365 216 l. J.2 052 022 008 003 001
50 9:)5 966 888 750 569 384 zao 1:..:2 0513 025 009 003 001
-----
• .ln.lt.i'Ll dec.,mu.1po:nc._ he.a beon omi\..tAd.
Two-out-of-Five Test T-Codit
~ ...... Date.
Type ol Sa,nple
Type OI 0,11 .,•nce
Instructions
Cod•• x Commont•
0
0
0
0
0
Anal)'?e results - or the 12 subjects. 9 were able to correctly group the fabric samples.
Reference 10 Table Tl4 shows Lhat the difference in surface feel was detectable al a level of
significance of a~ 0.00 I.
Interpret results - 'The fabric manufacturer is informed lhat a d1ffe1ence in surface feel
between the two fabric types is easily detectable.
TABL( T14
Critical Number of Correct Response in a Two-out-of-Five Te t
(Cntrie are x ,.,.)
C!nuics are 1hc n11n1mum 1111mN:r of cotrcc1 rc~pon~ rc:,qc1t-:J fo, ,11nrhc;JJ1ce at 1hc swcd tJ l~el (1 e .• colu11¥1) foe 1hc
cone1pond1ni nu~ of rc,pundulu, 11 (1 e • row) RtJ«I the anumpuoo of "no d1frucn«" 1( L~ number of COfTC(t
~pun1es ~ ,iu1cr ll'.m or eqi:i! 10 lhc tabled vlllue
a a
n 0.4C O.JO 0.20 0.10 o.os 0.01 0.001 n 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 o.os 0.01 0.001
JI 4 s s 6 7 8 10
32 4 s 6 6 7 9 10
J "- 2 2 3 3 33 s s 6 7 7 9 II
2 )4
., .•, 3 J 4 5 6 7 7 9 II
.-,
~ 2 3
, 3 4 3~
5'
5 6 7 8 9 11
6 ?
- • .) 3 4 5 36 s 6 7 g 9 11
7 2 2 2 3 ) 4 s 37 s 6
s
8 2 2 2 ) 6 7 8 9 II
3 4
9 2 l 3 3 4 4
) s 6 6 7 8 10 11 s
39 5 6 6 7 8 10 12
10 2 2 J 3 4 5 6 40 s 6 7 1 8 10 12
II '2 3 3 3 4 s 6 41 s 6 7 10 12
12 2 3 3 4 4 s 6 42 6 6 7 g' 6
9 10 12
@ DtJal s.taroaard test
'>31 ft,,l
A/&? ~
No. of
Prob.eb••••v ••v• 1,
19 14 14 15 15 15 16 17
:.o 15 ,s IS 16 16 I 7 18
21 15 15 16 16 I 7 1 7 18
22 16 18 16 • 7 17 18 19
23 16 1, ~ 7 1 7 18 19 ~o
24 17 17 18 18 19 19 20
25 1e 18 18 19 •9 20 21
26 18 18 19 lit 20 20 22
27 19 19 t9 20 20 21 22
28
?9
t9
20
~o
20
20
2t ,,
20 21
:?:>
22
-.
23
24
30
31
20
2,
21
21
21
22
22
22 , ..
22
23
..
23 24
25
32 22 22 22 23 24 26
33 22 :?3 23 23 24 25 26
34 23 23 23 24 25 25 27
35 23 24 24 26 25 ::s 27
36 24 24 25 25 26 27 28
37 24 25 25 26 26 27 29
30 25 2r. 26 26 :;>7 ?R 29
39 26 26 26 27 28 28 30
4() 26 27 27 27 28 29 so