Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1 Introduction
This introductory group project constitutes a major part of your coursework for the
module. The design of processing plants is a major aspect of all process-based
engineering degree programmes and with this coursework you will gain your first
experience of the design process.
In the professional world process design is carried out by groups of engineers rather
than by individuals and the project is therefore structured around group work. You
have been assigned to a group of students and you will tackle the problem together.
However, the result of the project will be marked individually in order to ensure that
everyone in the group contributes to the project.
The details of how to structure your work and how you will be assessed can be found
below. It is very important that you read this entire document with care so that
you understand clearly what is expected of you. If in any doubt, please ask
your group advisor!
2 Objective
By the end of this project each student should have been introduced to the basic
principles of process engineering design and to the process of developing and
integrating unit operation into a process flow diagram by linking group project work
with individual activities.
Each section has a word limit: provide a word count at the end of each section and
do not write more than the prescribed word limit. However, please note that the
number of words specified is a maximum but fewer words are also fine, provided that
the corresponding section is complete, clear and coherent.
The word limit does not include any graphics or tables that you will need to add to
illustrate the report. The various report sections and headings are as follows:
Title page
Executive summary
Table of contents
Introduction
1
Document1
Process route evaluation, process selection
Process Flow Diagram (this should not be a separate heading/section
but should be integrated in the appropriate section)
Ethical issues associated with the plant
Sources and Properties of Raw Materials
Discussion of Unit Operations and Issues of Materials of Construction
Process Chemistry, Process Operating Conditions and Associated
Challenges
Uses and Applications of the Product
Health and Safety and Environmental Issues
Process Economics
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
Appendix
2
Document1
3.7 Ethical issues associated with the plant (group responsibility – up to 500
words):
In this section you should briefly discuss the nature of potential ethical issues
associated with the human impact of your project (not including safety concerns).
This may include issues associated with the chosen process route, the plant location,
the effects on local and broader communities, the uses of the produced material, the
transport of raw materials and products, etc.
3
Document1
You should structure this section clearly (using sub-headings where necessary) and
appropriately justify the ethical challenges you are describing by explaining why they
are specifically relevant to your process, your plant, the materials/products involved
in your project.
4
Document1
5
Document1
and the impact any of the chemicals may have on the immediate surroundings in
case of uncontrolled release due to an accident.
6
Document1
the processing of organic chemicals can be found in the library and should be
consulted. Organic chemistry textbooks may contain useful information on the
chemistry of your process. Two examples are given below (references 6 and 7).
7
Document1
Semester 1 / Week 9-10 – general lecture on group projects and initial
allocation to groups; allocation of aircraft to groups;
Semester 1 / Week 11 –allocation of individual aspects of design;
January activities / Jan. 12th-14th –overview of possible processes, review of
their chemistry and decision on the selected process;
January activities / Jan. 15th – block diagrams of ALL processes, discussion on
progress of sections;
January activities / Jan. 16th – collation of all resource materials and
associated physical data, begin writing report;
January activities / Jan. 19th – flow diagrams for ALL process options
completed using Autocad software selection of individual final process,
continue writing report;
January activities / Jan. 20th – individual sections completed, group sections
being finalised accordingly;
January activities / Jan. 21st –draft report complete, begin assembling final
report, oral presentation fully designed and practised;
January activities / Jan. 23rd – report complete and submitted.
Please note that individual group advisors will make time for meeting their groups
throughout the January activities but it is your responsibility to schedule these
meetings.
8
Document1
References should be placed using the numerical style.
Add executive summary at the start of the report and provide a contents page
with page numbers. Provide a front cover (font size 28) with assignment title,
student names, module code and date.
Paragraphs (leave one extra line, no indent) should be used to break up the
text where appropriate.
Except for the Executive Summary, which should be written in the present
tense, all sections should be mostly written using the passive voice, i.e. it is
best not to use “I or we” in the report unless unavoidable. The use of the first
person should be avoided if possible.
Add in a word count for all sections. This does not include figures, tables and
their captions.
Add in the name of the group member authoring each individual section.
The report should be submitted online before the deadline. A bound paper
copy should also be submitted to the coursework box before the deadline.
9
Document1
- General presentation of the report (10%)
- a mark for the individual section (35%),
- a peer assessed mark (10%) and
- a mark for the group oral presentation (20%).
Your overall mark for this task (all of the above) represents 40% of the final mark for
the PEME1000 module.
In order for you to understand how the reports are going to be marked, detailed
criteria for grading are included in this document in Appendices A2–A5. Read these
Appendices carefully, as they set out what the assessors will be looking for in your
reports.
Submission deadline for the group report: Friday Jan. 23rd at 4pm.
8.1 Plagiarism
Please note that plagiarism is a serious offence and will be penalised in accordance
with the guidelines set out in your student handbook.
This gives you the opportunity to mark the other members of your group. The marks
you give to any one of the other group members should reflect the amount of effort
you perceive they have contributed to the report. If they have made an outstanding
contribution you may give them a high proportion of the marks, if they have done
nothing to contribute to the report you may not want to give any marks at all.
The total number of marks you will have to share amongst your colleagues will be set
by the size of your group, to ensure fairness between groups.
Do not assess your own contribution in the peer review, leave this to others.
The peer assessment should be carried out at the end of the project and you should
submit your marks for the other group members at the time your report is submitted.
Your marks should be recorded on the attached Peer Assessment Mark Sheet. Peer
assessment marks are confidential: you should not tell your colleagues how
you marked them and mark sheets should be submitted separately and
individually.
If you do not submit your peer assessment for the other group members you will lose
your peer assessed marks.
10
Document1
The date/time of upload of the electronic submission on the VLE will be taken as the
formal submission moment. Late reports will be penalised in accordance with the
procedures set out in the SPEME UG Student Handbook.
11
Document1
Names of Students:
Name of Advisor(s):
Title of Project:
Progress:
12
Document1
Signature of Advisor
13
Document1
Appendix A2 (a): PEME1000 Technical Skills and Applications
Group: # Title:
Mark Comments
Heading
Title page contains all requested
/1
information.
List of contents fits on one page
/1
and gives accurate information.
Free of grammatical/spelling
/1
errors.
Structure of the report follows
/1
guidelines.
SI units are used and always
/1
shown in the data.
Titles and legends of figures
always given and appropriately /1
positioned.
References are well balanced
(between websites, textbooks and
/1
journal articles) and appropriately
expressed.
Word Count is indicated for all
sections and follows the /1
guidelines.
Writing style is suitable for an
/1
academic report.
14
Document1
Appendix A2 (b): PEME1000 Technical Skills and Applications
Group: # Title:
Mark Comments
Heading
Executive summary: (up to 200
words): concise summary for a
general audience providing an
/5
overview of the content of the entire
report together with a summary of the
most important findings.
Introduction: (group responsibility, up
to 500 words): state the problem, to
give any necessary background
information and discuss the aims of /2.5
the report. Briefly explains the
structure of the report and justifies
the plant location.
Process Selection, Process
Evaluation and Process Flow
Diagram(s) (group responsibility, up
to 2000 words): The discussion in
this chapter should introduce the
different possible processes for the /10
manufacture of the corresponding
chemical. It should describe the
advantages and drawbacks of each
process and justify the choice of one
specific process.
Conclusion: (group responsibility, up
to 300 words): The conclusion should
summarise your report and pull
together the information in the
individual chapters: it should not
contain any additional discussion. It
/2.5
should highlight the most important
discussion points and outcomes of
the report. It should also specifically
link the information above to the aims
of the report as presented in the
introduction.
TOTAL /20
15
Document1
Group: # Title:
Mark Comments
Heading
All operating conditions given on the
/15
flow diagram.
Flow diagram is discussed
appropriately and referred to /25
throughout the report.
Good overall presentation of the flow
diagram – appropriate font, legend, /10
title.
TOTAL /50
Mark Comments
Heading
Organisation of the section: logical
order of the concepts presented, /6
good balance of arguments.
Clarity of the section: well described
arguments, justification for each /7
concept discussed.
Relevance of the arguments
presented: concepts described must
/7
be of significant importance to the
designed plant.
TOTAL /20
16
Document1
17
Document1
18