Argumentation in Practice
soargecennricny Seige
Edited by
Frans H. van Eemeren
Peter Houtlosser
i
Volume 2
Ais publication meets the minimum requirements
tion Seiences~ Permanence
Library Materials aNst 239.48- 1984,
Library of Congress Cataloging Publication Data
Table of contents
List of contributors
Introduction
Frans H. van Bemeren and Peter Houtlosser
|. Forms and conceptions of argumentation
(Carrer |
“The issue” in argumentation practice and theory
Robert T. Craig and Karen Tracy
Carrer 2
Hearing is believing: A perspective-dependent account ofthe fallacies
Christopher W. Tindale
Carrer 3
let's talk: Emotion and the pragm-dialectic model
‘Michael A. Gilbert
Cunpren +
Indicators of dissociation
M.A. van Rees
Capen 5
‘A collaborative model of argument
problem-solving interactions
‘Matthieu Quignard
Carrer 6
‘The argumentative dimension of discourse
Ruth Amossy
Carrer 7
Designing premises
Jean Goodwin
#8
69Me Tableofcomtents
‘Table ofcontenss v4
Carrer 8
On the pragmatics of argumer
Lit Bruton
Cuarrer 9
From argument anal
cH
‘The accusation of amalgame as a meta-argumentative refutation
Mari
ned) antagonist in advertising argumentation
Richardson
ing demands, multiple ideals and the structure of
argumentation practices: pragi tical analysis of televised
town hall meet wing the murder tral of O. J. Simpson
Mark Aakhus
Chapter 13
Arguments of vietims: A case study of the Timothy McVeigh trial
Tom Fareell and Mark Lawrence McPhail
Cuarren 16
ding of “Ellen's energy adventure”
iam Balthrop and Carole Blair
and civil society
us
15
4s
163
a3
as
Charren 18
‘The use of arguments from perceived opposition in U.S terrorism
Carol Winkler
(Cuarren 19
How could oficial speakers communicate reasonably with their king? 305,
Um Hoon
of French provincial printers, 1669-1 =
Jane McLeod and Hans V. Hansen
(Cuapren 21
Inventional capacity 37
Dale Hample
(Cuapren 22
‘The conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical freedom rule M9
Frans H, van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Bert Mewffels
Index 367Cuaprer 11
Constructing the (imagined) antagonist
in advertising argumentation
Albert Atkin and John E. Richardson
‘Sheffield
1, Introduction: The problem of the imagined antagonist