Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Bennet Cherukara
BI-209 101
300972119
Submited to:- Prof.Parimala Vidhya
Results:
McFarlands standard are used to standardize the approximate number of bacteria in a liquid
suspension and as per that, the concentration of Eschericia coli culture has been identiied as 1.8
x 109 and t he Enterococcus faecalis culture to be as 9.0x108 .The next was equalizing the cultures
into similar concentration and further diltution was made to recieve 60-80 cfu/filter over agar
plates.Then individually both the 5ml and 10ml filters were cultured on m-Endo agar and m-
enterococcus agar plates (Table 1.b).The positive and negative control resuls are marked in the
(Table 1.a).MPN technique was used to confirm the coliform count, the preseumptive test using
LSTB tubes showed gas production which is an indicated of presence of coliforms(Table 2.a).The
BHI agar was used to confirm the presence of enterococci The Gram staining from the LSTB
culture illustrated the prensence of gram negative rod shaped organisms and the colonies from
BHI under gram stain showed he presence of gram positive cocci in pairs and chains(Table
2.b).The confirmatory test BGLB showed turbidity and gas production for coliform(Table 3.a).
MF verification for enterocci was achieved after obtaining the negative results for catalase test, change
of media color to black on BEA plate, appearance of growth and turbidity on BHI broth + 6.5% NaCl and
BHI broth (Table 3.c). Subsequently, the differences between coliforms and fecal coliforms were
confirmed after inoculating the EMB plate, m-FC Agar plate, EC broth tube and negative control tubes
Table 1a. Growth obtained on the qualiy control plates of m-Endo and m- Entero agar.
● Colony morphology
Table 2a: Results of LSTB tubes which are inoculated with colnies from m Endo agar.
Catalase test of the colonies from BHI agar – Identified negative(No gas production)
Table2.b: Colony morphology and Gram staining of colony from BHI agar plate and LSTB tube
Table:3a: confirmation of membrane fileterd coliforms in BGLB tubes and compared with negative
controls and expected results.
Table 3b: confirmation and verification of coliforms and feacal coliforms using m-FC agar plate and EC
broth. And compared with negative control.
Table 3c: conformation of enterococci in BHI broth with salt and without salt and compared with
negative control.
BHI broth +6.5% NaCl salt BHI broth without salt Negative control
DISCUSSION:
There where many oraganism which was enumerated and identified in the water sample by
the membrane filtration method and MPN method .The bacterial cell culture were using the
McFarland standards and two different filters including(10 ml & 5 ml filter). These were
performed in m-Endo agar and m-Enterococcus agar. m-Endo agar is used to enumerate the
presence of coliforms and m-enterococcus agar is used for the isolate enterococci. For the
results obtained we got more amount of organisms on the 10 ml filtration on the both m-Endo
While working with the controls, positive controls on m-Endo agar did not receive growth, this
can be due to the following reasons including using hot loop directly over the test organism,
The expected colony count was ranging from 60-80 colonies on m-Endo and m-Entero plates ,
but the colony count received was almost three times lesser than the expected, that might be
because of the following reasons such as, the errors occurred during dilution, cross
contamination with any kind of inhibitors (Grabow, 1990). Verification of coliforms resulted
coliform yields expected results. Other than m-Endo agar and m-Entero agar we can also use
LES Endo and PES agar the benefit of LES Endo is rich in nutrients and also it is a best selective
media for coliforms. Similarly, PSE agar is an alternative for for m-Entero agar in which it has
When we compare the methods MPN and membrane filtration we could understand about
MPN that it requires less materials, able to enumerate low counts, and also one of the best
method which we could use for E.coli enumeration but as cons we cannot confirm the organism
without plating, time consuming and chances of occurring false positives. In case of membrane
filtration we can use even concentrated large samples, it allows removal of bactericidal agents,
less preparation time, less turnaround time and moreover, it provides good isolation and
enumeration but the cons are costly equipments, chances of fouling effect (Thomas, 1956).
LSTB is a selective media for coliforms and the lactose present acts as the main supporting
which provides the gram negative enough nutrients and the gas produced from the
fermentation has been demonstrated by the help of durham tube by looking at the gas bubble
these inhibitors are detected by the production of gas. Gas production is noted by the
appearance of bubbles in the durham tube (Difco Laboratories, 1998). The ingredients like
tryptose, yeast extract, glucose and lactose in m- enterococcus agar helps in the growth of the
organism not only it provides the nutrients but also it inhibits the growth of Gram negative
micro organisms. m-Endo agar main ingredients are tryptose, thiopeptone, casitone, yeast
extract which enables and promotes the growth of Gram negative organisms by providing the
The additional verification and confirmation of the enterococci was done through catalase test
in which the catalase was identified as negative. Observation and confirmation of enterococci in
BEA streak plate and its morphology confirms the presence of enterococci, the plate appeared to
be black in colour and the colonies observed as black in colour measuring 0.5-1mm pinpointed
grey coloured colonies and also the BHI broth +6.5% salt inhibits the growth of the other
organisms and it only promotes the growth of enterococci. In the BEA plate the enterococci
produced black coloured pinpointed colonies and moreover it also converted the media colour
to black because it was able to hydrolysis the bile esculin present in it (Grabow, 1990).
To sum up, the membrane filtration and MPN techniques are better ways for testing the
account of the organisms in water. From this experiment it is identified that the water tested
contains different species of organisms which reveals to be not potable to drink and it helps us
to understand the difference between coliforms and faecal coliforms. So, this is an effective and
REFERENCES:
Difco Laboratories (1998). Difco manual, 11th ed. Difco laboratories, Sparks, MD, USA
Gullicksonet. al. (2017) Pharmaceutical Microbiology Laboratory Manual. Centennial College: 8-21
Rose, R. E., E. E. Geldreich, and W. Litsky. (1975). Improved membrane filter method for fecal
coliform analysis. Appl. Microbiol. 29:532-536.
Thomas, H. A., R. L. Woodward, and D. W. Kabler. (1956). Use of molecular filter membranes for
water potability control. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 48:1391-1402
W.O.K. Grabow (1990). Microbiology of drinking water treatment: Reclaimed waste water.
In: Drinking Water Microbiology — Progress and Recent Developments (Ed. McFeters).
Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 185–203.