Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
GOVERNANCE
U1
BROACHING ETHICS
AND GOVERNANCE
Unit 1: Broaching Ethics and Governance 1.2
Study organiser
Before you begin this unit, please check through your study organiser. It shows the
topics that we’ll be covering, the skills you need to acquire (the learning outcomes),
and the activities you’ll do to help you acquire these skills.
Study time
You should be able to complete this section by the end of week 1.
To finish this unit you will need to complete the recommended reading
and activity 1.1.
Note: This course has an eLearning component. This means that along with
your print materials (this Study guide and I&A), and your textbook, you also
have access to an online learning space for UU200. Please refer to your I&A
booklet for instructions on how to login to the UU200 Moodle page. Your
print materials contain all the resources and information you need to
complete this course. However, you will find it useful to regularly login to
your online course page to:
access additional online resources, including short films;
contact your course coordinator to ask questions;
clarify your understanding of the ideas and concepts we cover in the
course; and
discuss matters relating to this course with other students.
Pre-Recorded Lecture: View the pre-recorded lecture for unit 1. This lecture has
already been uploaded onto your Moodle page.
You need to complete the prescribed readings and view the pre-recorded lecture
before you attend the fortnightly face-to-face tutorial.
1.0 Introduction
We often encounter ethical challenges or dilemmas in our everyday lives. Consider
the following:
a) You have an assignment due tomorrow at 10am. It is now midnight the night
before. You have not started working on the assignment. Do you attempt to
research and write the assignment or do you simply lift an essay from the
internet, re-format it and submit it as your own?
b) You find out that the manufacturers of your favourite face cream have been
cruelly using mice and rats for many years to test this product. Do you
continue to buy this cream or chose another (more expensive) one that has not
been tested on animals?
c) You are waiting at the market for a bus when you notice two fifty dollar notes
by your right shoe. Do you pick up the notes and put them in your pocket,
attempt to find the owner, take them to the police station or do nothing?
We are also faced with ethical dilemmas in our professional lives. What would you
do in each of the situations below?
a) You know that a product your company is manufacturing can make people
who consume it quite sick. Should you speak to someone in your company
about this, go to the media or remain quite because you are scared you may
lose your job as a junior employee?
b) Your colleague makes calls to her boyfriend in Australia everyday from the
phone at work. Should you tell her this is wrong or let her face the
consequences of her own actions?
c) Your son asks you for some coloured paper. There are reams of red paper at
your workplace. Do you take a ream from work at lunch time when nobody is
around or do you go to town and buy the paper from a shop?
All the challenges above, whether they are personal, professional, national or global
concerns, involve ethical decision-making. These challenges are also intricately
related to self, community, family, national, corporate and global approaches to
governance. We will closely examine the relationship between ethics and governance
in unit 4.
Before we enter more complex debates, we need to address an important question:
what is ethics?
Noel Preston defines ethics as ‘the study of what is right, fair, just or good’ (2007,
17). Ethics also involves ‘systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of
right and wrong behavior’ (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy). As there are no
clear right and wrong answers in ethics, you will see how important it is for you to
defend a particular position or stance (especially when we enter the field of applied
ethics and discuss controversial issues). The development of what we call ‘critical
reasoning’ or a ‘critical mind’ does not take place overnight or just in the fourteen
weeks that you study ethics. Ethics education is life-long and continuous. This is
reflected in the following quotation: ‘ethics refers to the continuous effort of studying
our own moral beliefs and our moral conduct, and striving to ensure that we, and the
institutions we help to shape, live up to standards that are reasonable and solidly-
based’ (Markkula Centre for Applied Ethics).
A trolley (or train) is out of control and speeding down the track. The breaks have
failed. There is an innocent person on the track ahead of the trolley and he will be
killed if the trolley continues going straight ahead. There is a track leading to the
right. Unfortunately, five people are on that track. You are strolling by and see that
you can press a button that would cause the trolley to go on the right track. If you do
this, you will save one person, but cause five to die, or you can do nothing, allowing
the one to die. You are an ‘innocent bystander,’ in the sense that you are not an
employee of the railroad or a member of any public safety agency.
Judith Jarvis Thomson revised this scenario which she called ‘The Trolley and the Fat
Man’:
You are standing on a bridge, watching a trolley hurtling down the tracks below you
toward five innocent persons. The brakes have failed, and the only way you can stop
the trolley is to throw a heavy object in its path. There is a fat man standing on the
bridge next to you, and you could push him over the railing and onto the tracks below.
If you do, the fat man will die, but the five will be saved
‘The Trolley Problem’ and ‘The Trolley and the Fat Man’ are examples of moral
paradoxes or ethical dilemmas. When we are faced with an ethical dilemma, we
have to choose between two or more morally acceptable courses of action (Hamric,
Spross, and Hanson, 2000). This will involve closely examining the situation and
coming up with what we think is the ethical or right solution. When both courses of
action result in a negative outcome or end result, this is when the situation becomes
very complicated. Sometimes, we have no option but to choose between equally
unacceptable alternatives.
For example, in ‘The Trolley Problem’ and ‘The Trolley and the Fat Man’ someone
will die and you cannot prevent this. But you may be able to lessen the number of
deaths that take place from five to one. In this situation, should you think about what
is best for the most number of people? Or, should you do nothing and hope or pray
that something miraculous happens and there is some divine intervention? Would you
be able to live with yourself if you failed to make a decision and all five people are
killed?
However, some people argue that allowing one person to die is more
permissible than pushing the fat man over the bridge. Why do you think
they would reason in this way? Do you agree with this view?
The reasoning behind this argument is that if you let one person die (as in ‘The
Trolley Problem’) this is a side effect of your decision or your inaction. On the other
hand, when you kill the fat man by pushing him over the bridge, you cause
intentional harm to him. What is your response to this?
Indeed killing one or five people is unethical in itself. But consequentialists argue that
an action that leads to serious harm is permissible if it promotes a good end. This is
called the Doctrine of Double Effect. Non-consequentialists would disagree with this
and insist that murder is always absolutely wrong regardless of the consequences. We
will discuss these theoretical approaches in detail in unit 3.
Hopefully, it is now clear that the line between right and wrong is often blurry and
subjective. In other words, your answers to both these scenarios may be quite
different from someone else’s answers. This does not mean that your view is wrong
and the other person’s view is right. Such is the nature of ethical debates. The trick is
to demonstrate ethical reasoning in your answers. The role of ethical reasoning is to
highlight two kinds of acts: those which contribute to the well-being of others and
those that harm others. When we are able to weigh up the options in a given situation
in relation to how it may impact on other people around us, we are demonstrating
ethical reasoning. Asking ‘why’ questions are also crucial in such situations.
While ethics focuses on how a person should behave, values are concerned with
beliefs and attitudes that determine how a person actually behaves. Values can be
Unit 1: Broaching Ethics and Governance 1.7
divided into two main types: ethical and unethical values. Ethical values relate to
principles or beliefs about what is right and good (virtues) while unethical values
concern what is wrong or bad (vices). Some examples of ethical values that are
common or shared among most communities are trustworthiness, respect, caring,
responsibility, fairness, and Citizenship. These values form what is called the six
pillars of character (Kansas State University). We will discuss these pillars in more
depth in unit 3.
To illustrate this discussion on values, please view the two short films below. You
will need to type the following URL links into Google or click on unit 1 of your
Moodle page to view these short films.
There are two ways to answer this question. If you are a relativist, you would argue
that each culture or society has its own set of values or moral code that it follows. This
differs from society to society. If you believe in Ethical Universalism you would say
that there is a core set of values that most people share in the world regardless of their
religion or culture. These may be truth, love, citizenship and so forth. Human Rights
are based on universal or core values. We will consider these two opposing points of
view in more depth later in the course.
Spend a few minutes looking at the headlines in one of your local newspapers and try
to establish a link between these issues and ethics. News stories about murder,
suicide, violence, rape, prostitution, abortion, the environment and animals all concern
ethics. In fact, most news stories have an ethical dimension. Even stories concerning
drug use in sports can be analysed using ethical theories. A story about a celebrity
who has committed adultery raises ethical concerns. Corporal punishment in schools
and arranged marriages may be discussed using a rights-based approach to ethics.
Can you now see how broad the field of ethics is?
By the end of the course, we hope you will be able to easily analyse these applied
ethical issues using theories and principles related to ethics and governance.
The film below demonstrates a very common ethical issue that students are often
confronted with.
This short film deals with the issue of plagiarism. Plagiarism is defined as: ‘stealing
and passing off the ideas or words of another person as one's own; using (another's
production) without crediting the source; committing literary theft; and ‘presenting as
Also see USP’s policy on plagiarism and dishonest practice available online at:
http://www.usp.ac.fj/.
However, it is necessary to stress that UU200 does not force students to adopt or
follow one ‘correct’ ethical standpoint. Rather, this course aims to provide you with
the tools to make your own decisions. To illustrate this point, consider the following
quotation by Italian physicist and astronomer, Galileo Galilei (1564-1642): ‘You
cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him to discover it in himself’ (Value
quotes). UU200 will provide you with the tools or the framework for ethical thought
and responsible decision-making. However, it is ultimately up to you to put this
knowledge into practice and to make your own decisions.
Activity 1.1
1. What is ethics?
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
3. What is the relationship between ethics and values? (Include some discussion of
vices and virtues in your response).
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
4. Give an example of an ethical dilemma you have been faced with. How did you
resolve this dilemma?
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
5. Select one story from a newspaper in your country. Explain how this news story is
related to ethics.
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________