Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act does not give the FDA

“access to people ..."

The Lawful proprietary-based limitations to the
jurisdiction of the FDA.
Entry at the United States Federal Registry verified on:
January 17, 2018 -
"... a Comment on the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) Notice: Drug Products Labeled as Homeopathic;
Draft Guidance for Food and Drug Administration Staff and
Industry; ...
The very first issue that needs to be addressed is to
identify the Lawful authority here!
The ‘Food and Drug Administration’ was created by an Act
of Congress. As such there are well-defined limitations on
the jurisdiction of the FDA (as defined by the written
Organic Laws of the United States of America).
‘All “Acts of Congress” ... apply only within the territory of
the United States government, of which states of the
Union are not part because they are foreign states[ii] (see
86 C.J.S. 1). Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 54(c),
wherein is defined “Act of Congress.” Rule 54(c) states the
following. The language below was removed from this rule
and removed by committee around Dec. 2002: “Act of
Congress” includes any act of Congress locally applicable
to and in force in the District of Columbia, in Puerto Rico,
in a territory[i] or in an insular possession.
[for a listing of the above locations covered by “Acts of
Congress”, refer to Title 48 U.S.C.]"[iii][iv]
In other words the Lawful jurisdiction for the FDA is limited
to property that is absolutely owned by and under the
exclusive legislation of the "United States". Business
owners who are involved with manufacturing Homeopathic
products on property not owned by the government within
any of the several states need to be asking the FDA: "By
What Authority?" and once they do the FDA will either
have to show the written Law authorizing mandatory
government interference in a privately-owned business on
non-government land or cease and desist in the trespass.
-
Notes:

[i] https://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/
territory.htm


[ii] https://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/
ForeignState.htm
[iii] https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/48


[iv] In GreatIRSHoax (PDF via famguardian.org):
http://www.deepinfo.com/downloads/
GreatIRSHoax20050424s.pdf
(End of Comment at Federal Registry.)
I live on private land in California without the United States
however the "Country" drop-down menu on the Federal
Registry form where I commented (above) only shows
"United States" as a "Country". This is another example of
semantic deceit.'[4]

-
***

Initial post on July 16th, 2017 -
This is a start of results I'm collecting that pertain to the
"government's" Lawful limitations to its jurisdiction and
especially re: the FDA.
"... William Zuber and Dr. Alan B. Lisook of the FDA were
refused access to any documents by Jacob even in the
face of the federal warrant. Instead, Jacob’s attorney, Jay
Geller, answered the warrant point-by-point in federal
court. Mr. Geller said such reports or documents didn’t
exist or, if they did, were not in Jacob’s possession.
Geller added that certain documents requested were
privileged patient information and not available even under
court order except in cases where patients give
permission. Zuber and Lisook walked away with only one
paper that Jacob provided, a two-page memo on DMSO
and its legal use in treating interstitial cystitis. Otherwise,
they got no response to questions they asked. Zuber
admitted he did not have any authority to question the
physician, since the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act does
not give the FDA “access to people, just things.”[1]
My vision for answering the need for clarity on this subject
matter is summarized in the following outline:
#1.) The Constitution of September 17, 1787 in light of the
Organic Laws of the United States of America
(unincorporated).


#2.) "The Congress" in light of the above.


#3.) The "Acts" of Congress and their proprietary
jurisdiction.
#4. ) The Act of Congress that apparently established what
we now know as the FDA.
#5.) FDA jurisdiction in light of The Organic Law.
Re: #1.) There is a problem with the extent of Lawful
jurisdiction based on "this Constitution". The problem is
that members of The Congress and the "President" are not
"bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this
Constitution". "What would it take for all those Officers
mentioned in Article VI to 'be bound by Oath or Affirmation,
to support this Constitution'? Each Representative, every
Senator and George Washington would have to attach to a
copy of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 a piece of
paper with the words: 'I support this Constitution' and
subscribe their signature."[2] That process has never
occurred!
Re: #2.) Congress is a show (possibly the greatest show
on earth!). Firstly the members are not bound to support
"this Constitution" and consequently it isn't supported. In
addition - Congress actually has ceased to exist legally
based on the requirements of the written Law of the
Constitution.
***

July 21, 2017 -
Just "posted" at David Gumpert's:
Thank you Lis!

Items 1., 2. and 3, are excellent![3]
The government educates it’s citizens into believing that
the “Constitution” gives them “rights”. The true Rights are
the “Unalienable” ones (just like it says in the first Organic
Law (Declaration of Independence) that threw off external
“government”!
Besides, the Constitution of September 17, 1787 was
never adopted by the members of Congress or the
“president” by way of a written oath to “support this
Constitution”. Unadopted, the document can only “rise” to
the level of a corporate agreement among the corporate
state members as no Man or Woman is party to this and
need not be if they stand their own ground.
But who can hear this? Apparently only the “free
Inhabitant” (as per second Organic Law).
You absolutely must “Do your research.” Otherwise you
are in the government’s “church of believers” singing out of
their hymnal!
***

July 23, 2017 -
My first introduction to Robert David Steele who said:
“The food industry and pharmaceutical industry have three
goals in life:

to make all of us fat and give us diseases, to sell us stuff
that doesn’t work to cure those diseases, and to make a
big profit while doing so.
The Food and Drug Administration and the Center For
Disease Control are criminal networks. They should be
under indictment because their job is to approve the
poisoning and lethal injection of American Citizens.”:
Robert David Steele "Uncovering the Deep State, What's
next?" #UNRIG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=jJ_QleZJ890&feature=youtu.be
-
***********^***********
Notes:
[1]
http://www.penguin.com/ajax/books/excerpt/
9780895295484

[2] https://organiclaws.org/tag/ratification/
Also see:
https://organiclaws.org/tag/
jurisdictionconstitutiontaxpropertyorganiclaw/page/85/

[3] See "July 8, 2017 at 3:59 pm" at about the 41st

comment down the page on:
http://www.davidgumpert.com/sam-girods-martyrdom-us-
disservice

[4] https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=FDA-2017-
D-6580- 0334&utm_campaign=comment+publication
+notification
+email&utm_source=federalregister.gov&utm_medium=e
mail
-