Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
0 SUMMARY
Volume of NaOH : 3L
Volume of Et(Ac) : 3L
Temperature : 30 °C
60
50
Conversion, X (%)
40
30℃
30
40℃
20
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time (min)
Figure 2.0: A graph of conversion, X (%) against time (min) for both temperature.
Table 2.1: Data calculated for both temperature.
120.00
100.00
1/CA
80.00
30℃
60.00
Linear (30℃)
40.00
20.00
0.00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time (min)
Figure 2.1: A graph of 1/CA against time at 30℃ and the slope obtained is 1.2116.
300.00
200.00
1/CA
150.00
40℃
50.00
0.00
0 10 20 30 40 50
Time (min)
Figure 2.2: A graph of 1/CA against time at 40℃ and the slope obtained is 3.5303.
1.2
y = -9722.7x + 32.277
1
0.8
ln k
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.00318 0.0032 0.00322 0.00324 0.00326 0.00328 0.0033 0.00332
1/T (K-1)
Figure 2.3: A graph of ln k against 1/T and the slope obtained is -9722.7.
Ea = 2.819 J/mol
A = 1.1042 x 1014
3.0 ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
In this experiment, there were two distinct temperature used which are 30℃ and
40℃. For both temperature, the conductivity of all samples that withdrawn for every 5
minutes was delibrated and the concentration of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and
conversion were calculated. Hence, based on Table 2.0 and 2.1, the concentration of
sodium hydroxide was determined by the calibration curve, as shown in Appendix A.
Based on the data tabulated on Table 2.0 and 2.1, concentration of sodium hydroxide
decreased with the conductivity decreased.
From Figure 2.0, the conversion increased and slightly decreased as the time
increased for both temperature but the highest conversion obtained at 40℃ compared to
30℃. This result can be supported by the theory, the conductivity increased as the
conversion decreased. Thus, conductivity is inversely proportional to conversion. In
addition, the rate of reaction will affected by temperature which this can be interpreted by
the result obtained, higher temperature has higher conversion. This also can be
supported by the theory which when the temperature increased, the movement of the
particles vibrate increasingly and this affected the particles to collide to each other.
Therefore, it will cause the reaction increase because the movement particles increase
and release the energy.
Next, a graph of 1/CA against time for both temperature were plotted because the
reaction follows the second order reaction. Based on Figure 2.1 and 2.2, both temperature
have same pattern which 1/CA increased as the time increased. This can be explained as
the time of the reaction is longer, the concentration of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) will
decrease and reduced to form the product. Besides, in this experiment, sodium hydroxide
was the limiting reactant. Thus, when the concentration of sodium hydroxide is inversely,
it will become increased. Based on the graphs plotted, the rate constant (k) were
determined which are 1.2116 for 30℃ and 3.5303 for 40℃. Lastly, a graph of ln k against
1/T was plotted to evaluate the saponification reaction’s activation energy (E a) and the
frequency factor (A). Based on Figure 2.3, the ln k is inversely proportional to 1/T.
Therefore, based on this result obtained, it can support that this saponification reaction is
a second order reaction. In addition, the saponification reaction’s activation energy (E a)
obtained is 2.819 J/mol and the frequency factor is 1.1042 x 1014.
4.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 CONCLUSIONS
There are a few steps that can be taken to prevent the errors which firstly, before
the experiment was started, all team members need to examine the manual of to prevent
misleading process. All the valves need to double check if it is open or closed according
to the manual. Next, this experiment is a time consuming because the process need to
heat and cool down the reactor according to the desired temperature set up. The reactor
temperature must be same with the desired temperature to avoid any error that might
affected the results. Besides, as the readings of the conductivity remain constant, the
process can be stopped. There must be a few possible errors occurred during carry out
the conductivity meter and this might be affected the results. This errors can be possibly
occurred because of the conductivity meter’s rod is not clean and the rod must be wiped
before measured other samples.
5.0 TUTORIAL
The article titled “An Analysis of Adiabatic Batch Reactor” written by Arcadii,
Scott, and Laura. During this research, an adiabatic batch reactor is to be said, is
relevant to fields pertaining to the prediction of temperature in chemical reactions; in
determining the temperature reached and concentration of reactants left. Besides,
this reactor is precisely used in a small scale laboratory applications, for example,
the production and introduction of fermentation of beverage products. Batch reactors
are also importantly used in the field of waste water treatment due to their
effectiveness in decreasing the biological oxygen demand (BOD) of waste water
(Asiedu et al, 2013). The goal of this study from an adiabatic batch reactor is to
determine the temperature, concentration of a mixture and time needed for the
hydrolysis of acetic anhydrate mixture that is reacted with excess water in the reactor
to form an exothermic reaction. An adiabatic reactor is insulated on order to prevent
any heat exchange with its surroundings. Reaction progress was tracked by actual-
time under various temperature of conditions. The variables examined for
comparative study are concentration, Due to the Fritzer et al (2014), heat will be
released and the temperature inside the adiabatic reactor will increased since the
reaction is exothermic, hence, the highest temperatures will cause the reaction to
occur faster. The rate reaction increases with increase of temperature in case of
batch reactor under studies range of temperature. The results obtained in this
investigation may be useful in maximing the industrial level of production of desired
product. Hence, in the future projects would be easier resolve the chemical reaction
that provide more accurate results after a certain amount of time. The advantages
of batch reactor include the low difficulty to cater for slow reactions and capability of
high conversion per unit volume for pass.
6.0 REFERENCES
Ahmad., A., Imran., M. A., Younas., M., Khan., H., & Shah., M. H. (2013). A comparative
study of alkaline hydrolysis of ethyl acetate using design of experiments. Iranian
Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering. 32(4): 33 – 47.
Arcadii., G., Scott., C., & Laura., A. (2013) An analysis of adiabatic batch reactor.
Undergraduate Journal of Mathematical Modelling. 12(6): Article 4
Bursali., N., Ertunc., S. & Akay. (2006). Process improvement approach to saponification
reaction using statistical experimental design. Chemical Engineering Process. 45: 980
– 989.
Das., K., Sahoo., P., Baba., M. S., Murali., N., & Swainathan., P. (2011). Kinetic studies
on saponification of ethyl acetate using an innovative conductivity-monitoring
instrument with a pulsating sensor. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics. 43(11):
648 – 656.
Fritzer., B. C., et al. (2014). Acetic anhydride hydrolysis at high acetic anhydride to water
ratios. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics 46(2014): 151 – 160.
Gleason., P., P., & Shah., N., D. (2013). Patenting in the biopharmaceutical industry.
Journal of Nature Biotechnology 2.1(2013): 130 - 140
7.1 APPENDIX A
Calibration Curve:
7.2 APPENDIX B
A) Temp: 30°C
= 9.23 % = 50.77 %
B) Temp: 40°C
= 6.38 % = 61.70 %
7.3 APPENDIX C
1 1
= 𝑘𝑡 +
𝐶𝐴 𝐶𝐴𝑂
Where k is rate constant, therefore the rate constant can obtained from the graph plotted
which are 1.2116 for 30℃ and 3.5303 for 40℃.
0.00319 − 𝐸𝑎 1 1
𝑙𝑛 = ( − )
0.00330 𝐽 303.15 𝐾 313.15 𝐾
8.314
𝑚𝑜𝑙. 𝐾
𝐽
− 𝐸𝑎 = −2.819
𝑚𝑜𝑙
𝐽
− 𝐸𝑎 = 2.819
𝑚𝑜𝑙
ln A = 32.277
A = e(32.277)
A = 1.1042 x 1014