Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Title
H.W. # 4
01/06/17
Grade
Reference(s)
http://www.help2educate.com/busbar-schemes/
Single breaker single busbar scheme
As the name suggests, it consists of single bus bar with a number of incoming and outgoing
lines connected to it. Each line is protected by one breaker. Therefore it is called single
breaker single busbar scheme.
Advantages
It is simplest scheme with artless protection system.
Advantages
Either bus can be used to feed load or both can also be used simultaneously.
Maintenance on any bus can be carried out without interrupting the power supply.
Bus Coupler enables the ON LOAD shifting of load from one bus to another.
Disadvantages
It is expensive than single bus bar scheme.
Advantages:
It is the most reliable bus bar scheme.
Any bus bar can be taken out for maintenance without disturbing power supply.
Any breaker can be spared for maintenance while the respective line can be connected
through second breaker.
Load can be fed from any bus bar which increases operational reliability.
Disadvantages:
It is the most expensive bus bar scheme. Cost is double as compared to single breaker
single bus bar scheme.
Substation utilizing this scheme requires large area.
It requires more components than any other scheme.
Double busbar schemes are used in EHV substation whose reliability and continuity is of
very important. Substation feeding defense or strategically important areas employ this
scheme.
Ring or Mesh Bus bar scheme
In this scheme, circuit breakers and isolators are arranged in the form of ring. Incoming and
outgoing circuits are connected between two breakers. In this scheme, number of breakers
is equal to the number of circuits. In normal condition, each circuit is fed from both sides.
During fault or maintenance, respective breaker or portion is isolated however the all the
circuits are fed from open ring.
Advantages
Very reliable along with operational flexibility.
Any breaker can be taken out for maintenance however all the circuits can be kept
energized.
It is economical as compared to double bus bar scheme.
The setting of the protective relays does not need variation for any of the operating
modes and maintenance.
Disadvantages
In case of any fault, the ring may split into two isolated sections. Each of the section
may not have proper combination of loads and sources.
Although it can accommodate many circuits however it is not suitable for more than 6
circuits.
This scheme can be extended or converted into one and half breaker scheme easily.
Therefore it is a normal practice in many countries that substations are built with ring/mesh
bus bar scheme initially. However, later on converted to 1.5 breaker scheme upon the
increase in number of circuits.
Advantages:
It is the second most reliable scheme after double breaker double bus bar scheme.
Any bus bar can be spared for maintenance without interrupting power supply.
Any breaker can be removed for maintenance while other breakers can keep energizing
the relevant line.
There is also a possibility of operating the system with both buses out of service.
This scheme can accommodate as many lines as required.
Disadvantages:
The protection system and relay settings for this scheme are complex than other
schemes.
It is comparatively expensive than other schemes except double breaker double bus bar
scheme.
Tripping of the middle breaker trips other two breakers affecting the healthy line as well.
It is mostly used in 500kV/220kV substations. It is used where reliability and continuity of
power is required.
CONCLUSION