HM Courts

&Tribunals HM Courts & Tribunals Service

Social Security & Child Support Appeals
Service York House
31 York Place
LEEDS. LS1 2ED
Phone: 0300 123 1142
Fax: 0113-389-6001
www.tribunals.gov.uk

National Insurance number: NE XX XX XX X

Reference number: SC993/13/01435
Date: 20/12/2013

Dear Mr. Xxxxxx

About your JOB SEEKERS ALLOWANCE appeal

The DWP have revised their decisions in your favour. I am not sure if they have notified you of their
action so I am sending you copies of their correspondence.

Yours sincerely

Clerk to the Tribunal

GAPS 390/97 Ver. 4240 Appellant

Ref: GTT/409355/J
JOBCENTRE PLUS

To: JCP HULL BDC From: Newcastle BC (LM DRT) Sector

Office
Jobcentre Plus
Newcastle Benefit Centre
Mail Handling Site A
Wolverhampton
WV98 1NB

12 December 2013

Jobseeker Details:

Name: Mr X. Xxxxxx NI number/Cust Ref No: NE XX XX XX X:

Sector Decision Maker: X. Xxxxxx

AR Code Outcome Invoice Number

JSA/249/719S FAVOURABLE AND ALLOWED NEWCASTLE

We have looked again at the decision dated 29/07/2010.

The new decision is that the jobseeker is not disentitled or sanctioned.

The law used to make this decision

Social Security Act 1998 sec 9

JSAPS Code: CSL001

DATE OF TRANSGRESSION ASSUMED TO BE 07/07/2010

The decision dated 29/07/2010 is erroneous in Law and is revised.

Section 19 (1) of the Jobseekers Act 1995 prescribes the circumstances in which
Jobseekers Allowance is not payable. It does not mention imposing sanctions on national
insurance credits.

Mr Xxxxx was not being paid Jobseekers Allowance and has not in fact been awarded
payment since 2009. In these circumstances it was incorrect in Law to apply the
sanction/disallowance.

In many respects the DM should only have made an ‘opinion’ decision on this question
rather than a formal decision. It is noted that there is no provision in Law for ‘opinion’
decisions to attract rights of appeal.

Overall the sanction/disallowance covering the period 07/07/2010 to 13/08/2010 is lifted.

It should be noted that papers relating to this decision are not held in storage and as such
the outcome cannot be supported
Ref: GTT/409356/J
JOBCENTRE PLUS

To: JCP HULL BDC From: Newcastle BC (LM DRT) Sector

Office
Jobcentre Plus
Newcastle Benefit Centre
Mail Handling Site A
Wolverhampton
WV98 1NB

12 December 2013

Jobseeker Details:

Name: Mr X. Xxxxxx NI number/Cust Ref No: NE XX XX XX X:

Sector Decision Maker: X. Xxxxxx

AR Code Outcome Invoice Number

JSA/249/552 FAVOURABLE AND ALLOWED NEWCASTLE

We have looked again at the decision dated 07/02/2012

The new decision is that the jobseeker is not disentitled or sanctioned.

The law used to make this decision

Social Security Act 1998 sec 9

JSAPS Code: CSN015

DATE OF TRANSGRESSION ASSUMED TO BE 18/01/2012

The decision dated 07/02/2012 is erroneous in Law and is revised.

Section 19 (1) of the Jobseekers Act 1995 prescribes the circumstances in which
Jobseekers Allowance is not payable. It does not mention imposing sanctions on national
insurance credits.

Mr Xxxxx was not being paid Jobseekers Allowance and has not in fact been awarded
payment since 2009. In these circumstances it was incorrect in Law to apply the
sanction/disallowance.

In many respects the DM should only have made an ‘opinion’ decision on this question
rather than a formal decision. It is noted that there is no provision in Law for ‘opinion’
decisions to attract rights of appeal.

Overall the sanction/disallowance covering the period 18/01/2012 TO 31/01/2012 is lifted.

It should also be noted that papers relating to this decision are not held in storage and as
such the outcome cannot be supported
Ref: GTT/409358/J
JOBCENTRE PLUS

To: From: Newcastle BC (LM DRT) Sector

Office
Jobcentre Plus
Newcastle Benefit Centre
Mail Handling Site A
Wolverhampton
WV98 1NB

12 December 2013

Jobseeker Details:

Name: Mr X. Xxxxxx NI number/Cust Ref No: NE XX XX XX X:

Sector Decision Maker: X. Xxxxxx

AR Code Outcome Invoice Number

JSA/249/552 FAVOURABLE AND ALLOWED NEWCASTLE

We have looked again at the decision dated 12/04/2012

The new decision is that the jobseeker is not disentitled or sanctioned.

The law used to make this decision

Social Security Act 1998 sec 9

JSAPS Code: CSN015

DATE OF TRANSGRESSION ASSUMED TO BE 28/03/2012

The decision dated 12/04/2012 is erroneous in Law and is revised.

Section 19 (1) of the Jobseekers Act 1995 prescribes the circumstances in which
Jobseekers Allowance is not payable. It does not mention imposing sanctions on national
insurance credits.

Mr Xxxxx was not being paid Jobseekers Allowance and has not in fact been awarded
payment since 2009. In these circumstances it was incorrect in Law to apply the
sanction/disallowance.

In many respects the DM should only have made an ‘opinion’ decision on this question
rather than a formal decision. It is noted that there is no provision in Law for ‘opinion’
decisions to attract rights of appeal.

Overall the sanction/disallowance covering the period 28/03/2012 to 10/04/2012 is lifted

It should also be noted that papers relating to this decision are not held in storage and as
such the outcome cannot be supported
Ref: GTT/409359/J
JOBCENTRE PLUS

To: JCP HULL BDC From: Newcastle BC (LM DRT) Sector

Office
Jobcentre Plus
Newcastle Benefit Centre
Mail Handling Site A
Wolverhampton
WV98 1NB

12 December 2013

Jobseeker Details:

Name: Mr X. Xxxxxx NI number/Cust Ref No: NE XX XX XX X:

Sector Decision Maker: X. Xxxxxx

AR Code Outcome Invoice Number

JSA/249/719J FAVOURABLE AND ALLOWED NEWCASTLE

We have looked again at the decision dated 11/09/2012.

The new decision is that the jobseeker is not disentitled or sanctioned.

The law used to make this decision

Social Security Act 1998 sec 9

JSAPS Code: CSL001

DATE OF TRANSGRESSION ASSUMED TO BE 28/03/2012

The decision dated 11/09/2012 is erroneous in Law and is revised.

Section 19 (1) of the Jobseekers Act 1995 prescribes the circumstances in which
Jobseekers Allowance is not payable. It does not mention imposing sanctions on national
insurance credits.

Mr Xxxxx was not being paid Jobseekers Allowance and has not in fact been awarded
payment since 2009. In these circumstances it was incorrect in Law to apply the
sanction/disallowance.

In many respects the DM should only have made an ‘opinion’ decision on this question
rather than a formal decision. It is noted that there is no provision in Law for ‘opinion’
decisions to attract rights of appeal.

Overall the sanction/disallowance covering the period 28/03/2012 to 10/04/2012 is lifted.

It is also noted that papers relating to this decision are not held in storage and as such the
outcome cannot be supported.
Ref: GTT/409360/J
JOBCENTRE PLUS

To: JCP HULL BDC From: Newcastle BC (LM DRT) Sector

Office
Jobcentre Plus
Newcastle Benefit Centre
Mail Handling Site A
Wolverhampton
WV98 1NB

12 December 2013

Jobseeker Details:

Name: Mr X. Xxxxxx NI number/Cust Ref No: NE XX XX XX X:

Sector Decision Maker: X. Xxxxxx

AR Code Outcome Invoice Number

JSA/249/552 FAVOURABLE AND ALLOWED NEWCASTLE

We have looked again at the decision dated 05/12/2012.

The new decision is that the jobseeker is not disentitled or sanctioned.

The law used to make this decision

Social Security Act 1998 sec 9

JSAPS Code: CSN015

DATE OF TRANSGRESSION 21/12/2012

The decision dated 05/12/2012 is erroneous in Law and is revised.

Section 19 (1) of the Jobseekers Act 1995 prescribes the circumstances in which
Jobseekers Allowance is not payable. It does not mention imposing sanctions on national
insurance credits.

Mr Xxxxx was not being paid Jobseekers Allowance and has not in fact been awarded
payment since 2009. In these circumstances it was incorrect in Law to apply the
sanction/disallowance.

In many respects the DM should only have made an ‘opinion’ decision on this question
rather than a formal decision. It is noted that there is no provision in Law for ‘opinion’
decisions to attract rights of appeal.

Overall the sanction/disallowance covering the period 21/11/2012 to 04/12/2012 is lifted.

Ref: GTT/409361/J
JOBCENTRE PLUS

To: JCP HULL BDC From: Newcastle BC (LM DRT) Sector

Office
Jobcentre Plus
Newcastle Benefit Centre
Mail Handling Site A
Wolverhampton
WV98 1NB

12 December 2013

Jobseeker Details:

Name: Mr X. Xxxxxx NI number/Cust Ref No: NE XX XX XX X:

Sector Decision Maker: X. Xxxxxx

AR Code Outcome Invoice Number

JSA/249/552 FAVOURABLE AND ALLOWED NEWCASTLE

We have looked again at the decision dated 30/01/2013.

The new decision is that the jobseeker is not disentitled or sanctioned.

The law used to make this decision

Social Security Act 1998 sec 9

JSAPS Code: CSN015

DATE OF TRANSGRESSION 16/01/2013

The decision dated 30/01/2013 is erroneous in Law and is revised.

Section 19 (1) of the Jobseekers Act 1995 prescribes the circumstances in which
Jobseekers Allowance is not payable. It does not mention imposing sanctions on national
insurance credits.

Mr Xxxxx was not being paid Jobseekers Allowance and has not in fact been awarded
payment since 2009. In these circumstances it was incorrect in Law to apply the
sanction/disallowance.

In many respects the DM should only have made an ‘opinion’ decision on this question
rather than a formal decision. It is noted that there is no provision in Law for ‘opinion’
decisions to attract rights of appeal.

Overall the sanction/disallowance covering the period 16/01/2013 to 29/01/2013 is lifted.