Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
On
UILS 112/13
Semester IX
B.A.LL.B (h)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
To be able to get an in depth analysis of some topic leave a different kind of confidence into
anyone’s mind. Similar is this topic, such that after a thorough reading of this topic it builds a kind
of familiarity and better understanding for applying the same to the practical legal problems.
I want to thank my teacher, Prof. Tanmeet for guiding me through this project topic and explaining
it so well such that the efforts divided to half due to the concept clarity. I also want to thank all
my friends without whose cooperation this project might not have been possible.
At finally yet importantly I would like to thank my parents for all the support.
Yajur Sharma
HISTORY
The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol
(A/RES/61/106) was adopted on 13 December 2006 at the United Nations Headquarters
in New York, and was opened for signature on 30 March 2007. There were 82 signatories
to the Convention, 44 signatories to the Optional Protocol, and 1 ratification of the
Convention. This is the highest number of signatories in history to a UN Convention on
its opening day. It is the first comprehensive human rights treaty of the 21st century and
is the first human rights convention to be open for signature by regional integration
organizations. The Convention entered into force on 3 May 2008.
The Convention follows decades of work by the United Nations to change attitudes and
approaches to persons with disabilities. It takes to a new height the movement from
viewing persons with disabilities as “objects” of charity, medical treatment and social
protection towards viewing persons with disabilities as “subjects” with rights, who are
capable of claiming those rights and making decisions for their lives based on their free
and informed consent as well as being active members of society.
The Convention was negotiated during eight sessions of an Ad Hoc Committee of the
General Assembly from 2002 to 2006, making it the fastest negotiated human rights
treaty.
The CRPD consists of 50 articles addressing the full array of civil and political,
economic, social, and cultural rights. The Convention does not seek to create new rights
for disabled persons, but rather elaborates and clarifies existing obligations for countries
within the disability context. It establishes a committee of experts to monitor its
implementation at the international level, and it also provides for the operation of
independent national level monitoring mechanisms. The CRPD is also joined by an
Optional Protocol that recognizes “the competence of the Committee on the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities to receive and consider communications from or on behalf of
individuals or groups of individuals subject to its jurisdiction who claim to be victims of
a violation by that State Party of the provisions of the Convention.” The CRPD is
therefore comprehensive not only in terms of its substantive content, but also in the
manner in which monitoring and implementation at all levels is addressed.
Preamble
Though not a legally binding provision of the CRPD, the Preamble nevertheless
addresses important issues of relevance for client countries and the Bank when
considering the anticipated value of the Convention, the nature of the concept of
disability, as well as additional contexts in which disabled persons should be included.
For example, the Preamble notes that despite “various instruments and undertakings”
persons with disabilities continue to face human rights violations and barriers to their full
inclusion and participation as equal members of society, and that the majority of disabled
persons live in “conditions of poverty.”
It also anticipates that promoting the full participation of persons with disabilities “will
result in … significant advances in the human, social and economic development of
society and the eradication of poverty,” and notes the “importance of mainstreaming
disability issues as an integral part of relevant strategies of sustainable development.”
With regard to the concept of disability, the Preamble recognizes “that disability is an
evolving concept” resulting from “the interaction between persons with impairments and
attitudinal and environmental barriers that hinders their full and effective participation in
society on an equal basis with others.”
Thus, the Preamble reflects the ‘social model of disability,’ and leaves room for those
interpreting and implementing the CRPD to utilize differing conceptualizations of
disability as they evolve over time. Furthermore, the Preamble recognizes the “diversity
of persons with disabilities,” thus reminding those implementing the CRPD that disabled
persons are a heterogeneous group encompassing people with a range of
impairments/functional capacities from a wide variety of social, ethnic and religious
contexts.
The Preamble also references numerous themes that are elaborated upon further in the
substantive articles. For example, it addresses “the importance of international
cooperation for improving the living conditions of persons with disabilities in every
country, particularly in developing countries”– a concept that is addressed again in more
detail in Article 32.
The Preamble addresses discrimination on the basis of disability as a “violation of the
inherent dignity and worth of the human person” – a concept addressed specifically in
Article 5 – and it highlights the importance of accessibility, which is taken up again in
Article 9.
The Preamble also emphasizes the need to address the specific situations faced by women
and girls with disabilities, as well as children with disabilities, and the need to
“incorporate a gender perspective in all efforts to promote the full enjoyment of human
rights and fundamental freedoms by persons with disabilities.”
These issues are taken up again in Articles 3 (principles (g) and (h)), 6 and 7 specifically,
as well as throughout the text to the extent possible.
Lastly, the Preamble also draws attention to two issues that were not addressed further in
the substantive provisions of the CRPD. Firstly, Preamble paragraph (p) notes concern
about “the difficult conditions faced by persons with disabilities who are subject to
multiple or aggravated forms of discrimination,” and it includes in its list of unacceptable
bases of discrimination “indigenous or social origin.” 1
Purpose (Article 1)
The purpose of the present Convention is to promote, protect and ensure the full and
equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with
disabilities, and to promote respect for their inherent dignity.
1
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/SOCIALPROTECTION/Resources/SP-Discussion-papers/Disability-DP/0712.pdf
Persons with disabilities include those who have long-term physical, mental, intellectual
or sensory impairments which in interaction with various barriers may hinder their full
and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others. 2
“Language” includes spoken and signed languages and other forms of non spoken
languages;
2
http://www.disabilityaction.org/services-and-projects/human-rights/summary-of-uncrpd/
The principles of the present Convention shall be:
a. Respect for inherent dignity, individual autonomy including the freedom to make
one’s own choices, and independence of persons;
b. Non-discrimination;
d. Respect for difference and acceptance of persons with disabilities as part of human
diversity and humanity;
e. Equality of opportunity;
f. Accessibility;
h. Respect for the evolving capacities of children with disabilities and respect for the
right of children with disabilities to preserve their identities.
1. States Parties undertake to ensure and promote the full realization of all human rights
and fundamental freedoms for all persons with disabilities without discrimination of any
kind on the basis of disability. To this end, States Parties undertake:
a) To adopt all appropriate legislative, administrative and other measures for the
implementation of the rights recognized in the present Convention;
c) To take into account the protection and promotion of the human rights of persons with
disabilities in all policies and programmes;
d) To refrain from engaging in any act or practice that is inconsistent with the present
Convention and to ensure that public authorities and institutions act in conformity with
the present Convention;
g) To undertake or promote research and development of, and to promote the availability
and use of new technologies, including information and communications technologies,
mobility aids, devices and assistive technologies, suitable for persons with disabilities,
giving priority to technologies at an affordable cost;
i) To promote the training of professionals and staff working with persons with
disabilities in the rights recognized in the present Convention so as to better provide the
assistance and services guaranteed by those rights.
2. With regard to economic, social and cultural rights, each State Party undertakes to take
measures to the maximum of its available resources and, where needed, within the
framework of international cooperation, with a view to achieving progressively the full
realization of these rights, without prejudice to those obligations contained in the present
Convention that are immediately applicable according to international law.
4. Nothing in the present Convention shall affect any provisions which are more
conducive to the realization of the rights of persons with disabilities and which may be
contained in the law of a State Party or international law in force for that State. There
shall be no restriction upon or derogation from any of the human rights and fundamental
freedoms recognized or existing in any State Party to the present Convention pursuant to
law, conventions, regulation or custom on the pretext that the present Convention does
not recognize such rights or freedoms or that it recognizes them to a lesser extent.
5. The provisions of the present Convention shall extend to all parts of federal States
without any limitations or exceptions.3
The Following Articles give a brief summary of the content contained therein
regarding the rights of the people with disabilities.4
3
http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf
4
http://www.disabilityaction.org/services-and-projects/human-rights/summary-of-uncrpd/
with disabilities. Children with disabilities have the right to express their views on all
matters affecting them.
Article 8: Awareness-raising
Countries must raise awareness of the rights, capabilities and contributions of people with
disabilities. Countries must challenge stereotypes and prejudices relating to people with
disabilities through campaigning, education, media and awareness-raising programmes.
Article 9: Accessibility
People with disabilities have the right to access all aspects of society on an equal basis
with others including the physical environment, transportation, information and
communications, and other facilities and services provided to the public.
Article 21: Freedom of expression and opinion, and access to information People with
disabilities have the right to express themselves, including the freedom to give and
receive information and ideas through all forms of communication, including through
accessible formats and technologies, sign languages, Braille, augmentative and
alternative communication, mass media and all other accessible means of
communication.
Articles 32-50
Articles 32-50 explain how countries, which are bound by the Convention, must give it
full effect. They also explain the responsibility of countries to report to the United
Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on how they are putting the
Convention into effect.
The following articles appear in the second half of the CRPD, and address a number of
activities to monitor and enhance the effective implementation of the Convention. As
with the specific articles addressed above, articles addressing implementation measures
are intended to be implemented in a manner consistent with the articles of general
application (i e. Articles 1-9).5
5
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/SOCIALPROTECTION/Resources/SP-Discussion-papers/Disability-DP/0712.pdf
6
Statement by José Antonio Ocampo, Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs, General Assembly
Ad Hoc Committee, 8th session, New York, 5 December 2006.
The Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) is a United
Nations body of 18 experts that meets two times a year in Geneva to consider the reports
submitted by 153 UN member states on their compliance with the Convention on the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and to examine individual petitions concerning 85
States Parties to the Optional Protocol.7
States that have ratified or acceded to the Optional Protocol have agreed to allow persons
within their jurisdiction to submit complaints to the Committee requesting a
determination whether provisions of the Covenant have been violated.
As noted above, the CRPD is comprehensive not only in terms of its substantive content, but also
in the manner in which monitoring and implementation at all levels is addressed. Article 34
specifically addresses monitoring at the international level (Article 33 addresses national
level implementation and monitoring), and establishes a committee of experts (including
experts with disabilities) to monitor the convention’s implementation, e.g. thr ough the
examination of periodic reports by States Parties.
The Optional Protocol to the CRPD also recognizes the competence of the Committee
established in Article 34 “to receive and consider communications from or on behalf of
individuals or groups of individuals subject to its jurisdiction who claim to be victims of
a violation by that State Party of the provisions of the Convention,” 8 and also to conduct
inquiry procedures into “grave or systemic violations” by a States Party. 9
Article 40, like Article 3 (General Principles) and Article 32 (International Cooperation),
7
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_on_the_Rights_of_Persons_with_Disabilities
8
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Article 1(1)
9
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Article 6.
is somewhat unusual in the context of a convention of this type. Indeed, such provisions
have been more common in the environmental and weapons control areas of international
law.
The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is a side-
agreement to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. It was adopted on 13
December 2006, and entered into force at the same time as its parent Convention on 3 May
2008. As of October 2016, it has 92 signatories and 92 state parties.
The Optional Protocol establishes an individual complaints mechanism for the Convention
similar to those of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women and Convention on the Elimination
of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. But this Protocol also accepts individual rights
on economic, social and cultural rights like Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Parties agree to recognize the competence of
the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities to consider complaints from individuals
or groups who claim their rights under the Convention have been violated. The Committee can
request information from and make recommendations to a party.
In addition, parties may permit the Committee to investigate, report on and make
recommendations on "grave or systematic violations" of the Convention. Parties may opt out of
this obligation on signature or ratification.
Article 1
A State Party to the present Protocol (“State Party”) recognizes the competence of the
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (“the Committee”) to receive and consider
communications from or on behalf of individuals or groups of individuals subject to its
jurisdiction who claim to be victims of a violation by that State Party of the provisions of the
Convention.
And futher Article 2 specifies when the committee shall consider a communication inadmissble
(c) The same matter has already been examined by the Committee or has been or is
being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement;
(d) All available domestic remedies have not been exhausted. This shall not be the rule
where the application of the remedies is unreasonably prolonged or unlikely to bring effective
relief;
(f) The facts that are the subject of the communication occurred prior to the entry into
force of the present Protocol for the State Party concerned unless those facts continued after that
date.10
As of 2015, " the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is conducting an
inquiry into the impact of the UK Government's policies on people with disabilities in relation to
their human rights obligations." The Committee has not previously conducted such an inquiry.11
WEBLIOGRAPHY
10
http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf
11
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_the_Rights_of_Persons_with_Disabilities
http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf
http://www.ennhri.org/The-Convention-on-the-Rights-of-Persons-with-Disabilities-
CRPD-43
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/SOCIALPROTECTION/Resources/SP-Discussion-
papers/Disability-DP/0712.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_on_the_Rights_of_Persons_with_Disabilities
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_the_Rights_of_Persons_with_Disabilities
http://www.disabilityaction.org/services-and-projects/human-rights/summary-of-uncrpd/