Kota Devashish Colony Om Const

PNT
REPORT ON
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR

CONSTRUCTION OF MULTISTOREY BUILDING
AT DEVASHISH CITY, BORKHERA, KOTA (RAJ.)
For :
M/S. OM CONSTRUCTIONS,
KOTA
By :
PNT DESIGNS PVT LTD.
A-229 (A), Road No.5, I.P.I.A., Jhalawar Road
KOTA-324005 (Raj.)
Mob.09929866699, 9414188818
ISO 9001:2008 Quality Certified Lab.
PNT
Geotechnical Investigation Report

for determination of Allowable Bearing Pressure
for Construction of Multistorey Building at
Devashish City, Borkhera, Kota (Raj.)
ABSTRACT
A). Raft Foundation:
The net allowable bearing capacity has been recommended as :
Location Depth of Size of Net Allowable Type of
Foundation Foundation Bearing Capacity foundation
Df (m) (m) (t/m²)
BH-1 to Raft
4.0m 17 X 43 10.0 t/m²
BH-5 Foundation
The safe load carrying pressure of Socketed Pile (Socket Length 1.0m, Cut off 4.0m)
in rock for the foundation of Multistorey Building at Devashish City, Borkhera,
Kota (Raj.) is recommended as follows:
Safe Load Lateral Load
Dia of pile, Length of Pile
Location Carrying Capacity
d (meter) (meter)
Capacity Qs (ton) (ton)
0.60 12.00 100.00 4.00

BH-01
1.00 12.00 250.00 7.00
0.60 10.70 150.00 4.50

BH-02
1.00 10.70 350.00 8.00
0.60 10.70 140.00 4.50

BH-03
1.00 10.70 350.00 8.00
0.60 14.00 150.00 3.50

BH-04
1.00 14.00 350.00 6.00
0.60 11.00 150.00 4.50

BH-05
1.00 11.00 350.00 8.00

PNT
CONTENTS
S. No. TOPIC PAGE NO.

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK 1
3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION 2
4.0 LABORATORY INVESTIGATION 2
5.0 INTERPRETATION OF TEST RESULTS 3
6.0 FOUNDATION ANALYSIS 4

7.0 CALCULATION OF ALLOWABLE BEARING 8
PRESSURE
8.0 CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION 8
REFERENCES 12
APPENDIX-A
APPENDIX-B1-B5
APPENDIX-C1-C5
TABLES
SITE PLAN

PNT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
It is proposed to carry out Geotechnical Investigations for the
construction of Multistorey Building at Devashish City, Borkhera, Kota as
shown in Fig.1.
The Schedule of work and the locations of bore holes were

decided by Engineer In-charge. The details are given in the following
sections.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK

Geotechnical Investigation was planned for:-
i) Transportation of tools, plants and personnel to the site & back.
ii) Boring of bore holes at the site in soil & collection of undisturbed &
disturbed soil sample up to required depth or up to refusal whichever is
earlier, conducting of SPT at every change of strata or 1.5 m interval as per
IS: 2131 up to required depth or refusal whichever is earlier & conducting
including related laboratory test as per IS : 2720 code on collected soil
samples. Natural Moisture Content, Specific Gravity, Sieve Analysis,
Hydrometer Analysis Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, Bulk/ Dry Density, C Ø
Analysis.
iii) Drilling beyond refusal (using NX-Size drill bit) in any kind of strata (Viz.
gravel/boulder/soft/hard rock) excluding Quartz & iron bearing rocky
strata) including collection of samples core recovery RQD data & following
laboratory test. Unconfined Compressive Strength, Water absorption,
Specific Gravity, Density.
iv) Preparation & submission of detailed report giving detailed calculation &
1
PNT
recommendation of SBC & type of foundation as per IS: 6403-1981,

8009(Part-I) 1976, 1080-1980, 2950-1981.
Accordingly, five bore holes with standard penetration test

(SPT) were performed at the proposed locations. Soil samples were
collected for further testing in the laboratory.
3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION

3.1 Boring
Five bore holes (i.e. BH-1 to BH-5) were made at the location
suggested by Engineer Incharge. Boring was made by power driven rig up
to the maximum depth of exploration i.e. 18.00m, 19.50m, 19.00m, 20.00m
& 19.00m at BH-01, BH-02, BH-03, BH-04 & BH-05 respectively. The
soil/rock samples were collected as required for laboratory testing.
3.2 Standard Penetration Test (SPT)

Standard penetration tests (SPT) were conducted in the bore
holes as per IS 2131-1981. The numbers of blows for first 15 cm
penetration are considered as seating drive and are not taken into account.
The number of blows required for last 30 cm penetration is taken as SPT
number (“N” values). If number of blows for last 30 cm penetration
exceeds 100, it is said to be the refusal. SPT Test was conducted at regular
interval of 1 .5m. Tests results are shown in Table: 1-5.
3.3 Water Table

The ground water table was observed at the depth of 2.50m at
the time of investigation (i.e. July’ 2017).
2
PNT
4.0 LABORATORY INVESTIGATION

The following laboratory tests were conducted on soil & rock
samples obtained from test bore holes:
A. Soil
a. Natural Moisture Content
b. Sieve & Hydrometer analysis
c. Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, Shrinkage Limit
d. Bulk/ Dry Density & Differential Free Swell
e. c-Ø Analysis
B. Rock
a) Uniaxial Compressive strength
b) Water absorption
c) Specific gravity
d) Density
The samples were identified and classified as per IS: 1498-
1970. The tests of samples were conducted as per relevant Indian Standard
Codes of Practice and tests results are shown in Table: 1-5.
5.0 INTERPRETATION OF TEST RESULTS

5.1 Type of Strata
The results of particle size analysis and plastic characteristics
of soil samples are presented in Table-1-5.
BH-1: The upper layer of strata at the site consists of Low Plastic Clay
(CL) mixed with Sand upto the depth of 16.00m. Beyond this, Highly
Weathered Rock was found upto the depth of exploration i.e. 18.00m. The
core recovery and RQD values are shown in bore-log i.e. Table-1.
3
PNT
(CL) mixed with Sand upto the depth of 14.70m. Beyond this, Medium
Grained Hard Rock was found upto the depth of exploration i.e. 19.50m.
The core recovery and RQD values are shown in bore-log i.e. Table-2.
(CL) mixed with Sand upto the depth of 14.70m. Beyond this, Moderately
Weathered Hard Rock was found upto the depth of exploration i.e. 19.00m.
(CL) mixed with Sand upto the depth of 13.50m. Below this, Highly
Weathered Rock was found upto the depth of 18.00m. Beyond this,
Medium Grained Hard Rock was found upto the depth of exploration i.e.
20.00m. The core recovery and RQD values are shown in bore-log i.e.
Table-4.
Table-5.
5.2 Swelling Characteristics

The results of free swell tests reveal that the soil at the site is
found to be Low expansive in nature.
6.0 FOUNDATION ANALYSIS

For a satisfactory performance of the foundation, following
criteria must be satisfied:
4
PNT
(i) The foundation must be safe against shear failure.

(ii) The foundation must not undergo excessive settlement.
The smaller of the bearing pressures obtained according to (i)
and (ii) above is adopted as the allowable bearing pressure.
For the foundation resting on Soil, a permissible total

settlement of 50 mm for a foundation resting on sand and 75 mm for a
foundation resting on clay is specified in IS: 1904-1978.
For foundation resting on Rock, a permissible total settlement

of 12mm for a foundation resting on rock is specified IS: 13063-1991.
6.1 For the Structures Resting on Rocky Strata

The bearing pressure of rocky strata is determined by various
methods suggested as per IS: 12070-1987. The methods are described as
below:
6.1.1 Based on Rock Classification:
The net safe bearing pressure based on classification of
the rock is tabulated below as per IS: 12070-1987.
TABLE-A :NET SAFE BEARING PRESSURE (qns) BASED

ON CLASSIFICATION
Material qns (t/m²)
Massive Crystalline bedrock including granite, diorite, gneiss, 1000
trap rock
Foliated rocks such as schist or slate in sound condition 400
Bedded limestone in sound condition 400
Sedimentary rock, including hard shales and sandstones 250
Soft or broken bedrock (excluding shale), and soft limestone 100
Soft shale 40
5
PNT
6.1.2 Rock Mass Rating (RMR) – may also be used to give net allowable
pressure as per Table-B. This will ensure settlement of raft
foundation up to 6 m thickness to be less than 12mm.
TABLE B NET SAFE BEARING PRESSURE BASED ON RMR
CLASSIFICATIO I II III IV V
N NO.
Description of rock Very Good Good Fair Poor Very
Poor
RMR 100-81 80-61 60-41 40-21 20-0
Qns (t/m²) 600-448 440-288 280-151 145-90-58 55-45-40
6.1.3 Based on Core Strength of the Rock

Where the rock is sound the strength of the foundation
rock is generally much in excess of the design requirements,
provided the wall of the discontinuities is closed and they are
favorably oriented with respect to the applied forces.
In case of rock mass with favorable characteristics that

is, rock surface is parallel to the base of the foundation, the load has
no tangential component, the rock mass has no open discontinuities,
the safe bearing pressure should be estimated from the equation:
qs = qc N i
Where
qs = safe bearing pressure (gross),
qc = average uniaxial compressive strength of rock cores,
Ni = empirical coefficient depending on the spacing of
discontinuities
3  S / Bf
=
10 1  300 / S
δ = thickness of discontinuities in cm,
6
PNT
S = spacing of discontinuities in cm, and

Bf = footing width in cm
6.1.4 Correction to the Net Safe Bearing Pressure

For getting the allowable bearing pressure the safe
bearing pressure obtained from the Table-A of IS: 12070-1987 and
based on unconfined compressive strength, should be multiplied
with the correction factor(s) given below according to the geological
conditions. These corrections are not applicable for the classification
of RMR method given in Table-B (of IS: 12070-1987)
Allowances should be made for submerged conditions,

cavities and slopes as given below:
i) Submerged condition under water table
a) Rock with discontinuous joints with opening less ¾
than 1mm wide;
b) Rock with continuous joints with opening 1 to ¾ to ½
5 mm wide and filled with clay; and
c) Limestone / Dolomite deposit with major cavities ⅔ to ½
filled with soil
ii) Cavities
Major cavities inside limestone ½
(core recovery less than 70 percent)
iii) Slope
a) Fair orientation of continuous joints in the slope 1 to ½
b) Unfavorable orientation of continuous joints in slope ½ to 1/3
Note: Factor of safety of slope should be at least 1.20.
7
PNT
6.2 For the Structures Resting on Soil Strata

For the structure resting on soil, the analysis of bearing
pressure shall be carried out for shear and settlement criteria.
The allowable bearing pressure of subsoil strata shall be

computed for shallow footing. The analysis is carried out for shear and
settlement failure considerations as per IS: 6403-1981, IS: 8009 Part-I
(1976) and IS: 1904-1986.
7.0 CALCULATION OF ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE

7.1 Raft Foundation
Raft foundation has been suggested. The analysis of bearing
capacity has been carried out for shear and settlement criteria as per IS
6403-1981 IS 8009-(Part-I)-1976 and IS 1904-1986. The details of
calculations for determination of allowable bearing pressure are shown in
Appendix-A.
7.2 Pile Foundation

Pile foundation has been analyzed. The calculation sheets
for safe bearing capacity in vertical for different borehole locations
are attached as Appendix-B1 to B5. The lateral load carrying capacity
of pile are attached as Appendix-C1 TO C5.
8.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Based on field exploration and laboratory investigation of
Soil & Rock, the following are the conclusion and recommendation:
1. The proposed site for Geotechnical Investigation for the construction of
Multistorey Building at Devashish City, Borkhera, Kota. The site plan is
shown in Fig.1.
8
PNT
2. The results of particle size analysis and plastic characteristics of soil

samples are presented in Table-1-5.
(CL) mixed with Sand upto the depth of 16.00m. Beyond this, Highly
Weathered Rock was found upto the depth of exploration i.e. 18.00m. The
core recovery and RQD values are shown in bore-log i.e. Table-1.
(CL) mixed with Sand upto the depth of 14.70m. Beyond this, Medium
Grained Hard Rock was found upto the depth of exploration i.e. 19.50m.
(CL) mixed with Sand upto the depth of 14.70m. Beyond this, Moderately
Weathered Hard Rock was found upto the depth of exploration i.e. 19.00m.
Table-4.
Table-5.
9
PNT
3. The results of free swell tests reveal that the soil at the site is found to be
Low expansive in nature.
4. The ground water table was observed at the depth of 2.50m at the time of
investigation (i.e. Jul’2017).
5. Raft foundation : The net allowable bearing capacity for Raft Foundation
has been recommended as :
Location Depth of Size of Net Allowable Type of
Foundation Foundation Bearing Capacity foundation
Df (m) (m) (t/m²)
BH-1 to Raft
BH-5
4.0m 17 X 43 10.0 t/m²
Foundation
6. Bored Pile foundation

The safe load carrying pressure of Socketed Pile (Socket Length 1.0m, Cut
off 4.0m) in rock for the foundation of Multistorey Building at Devashish
City, Borkhera, Kota (Raj.) is recommended as follows:
Safe Load Lateral Load

Dia of pile, Length of Pile
Location Carrying Capacity
d (meter) (meter)
Capacity Qs (ton) (ton)
0.60 12.00 100.00 4.00

BH-01
1.00 12.00 250.00 7.00
0.60 10.70 150.00 4.50

BH-02
1.00 10.70 350.00 8.00
0.60 10.70 140.00 4.50

BH-03
1.00 10.70 350.00 8.00
0.60 14.00 150.00 3.50

BH-04
1.00 14.00 350.00 6.00
0.60 11.00 150.00 4.50

BH-05
1.00 11.00 350.00 8.00
10
PNT
All the above recommendations are based upon the field data
collected from limited test locations and results of laboratory test carried
out on soil samples recovered from test bore holes and our experience in
this regard. In case the proposed structure is located away from the test
locations and /or the actual subsoil conditions during excavation of
foundation trench are found different from what has been reported above,
the consultants are to be referred for suggestions prior to taking up of actual
construction work at site.
FOR PNT DESIGNS PVT. LTD.,
DIRECTOR
11
PNT
REFERENCES
1. IS: 1904-1978 Code of practice for design and construction of
(RA-2015) foundation on soil- General Requirement.
2. IS: 6403-1981 Code of practice for determination of bearing
(RA-2011) capacity of shallow foundations.
3. IS: 8009 Code of practice for calculation of settlement
Part I 1976 of foundations.
(RA-2013)
4. IS: 1498-1970 Classification & Identification of soil for general
(RA-2011) engineering purpose.
5. IS: 2131-1981 Method of standard penetration test for soil
(RA-2011)
6. IS: 4968 Method of subsurface soundings of soils
Part I 1976
(RA-2011)
7. Ranjan & Rao Basic and Applied Soil Mechanics :
(1992) Wiley Eastern Limited, Delhi
8. IS:13063:1991 Structural safety of building on shallow
(RA-2016) foundations on rocks- code of Practice
9. IS:12070-1987 Code of practice for design and construction
(RA-2015) of shallow foundation on rocks
10. IS:9143-1979 Method for the determination of unconfined
(RA-2016) compressive strength of rock materials
11. 11315 Part-11 Methods for the quantitative description
1985 of discontinuities in rock mass - Core recovery
(RA-2016) and rock quality designation.
12. IS:2720 Methods of determination of Engineering
Properties of soil.
13. IS: 1892-1979 Code of practice for Subsurface Investigation for Fdn.
14. IS: 2132-1986 Code of Practice For Thin-walled Tube Sampling
(RA-2011) of Soils
15. IS: 9179-1979 Method for the Preparation of Rock Specimen for
(RA-2016) Laboratory Testing
16. IS: 13030-1991 Method of Test For Laboratory Determination Of
(RA-2016) Water Content, Porosity, Density and Related
Properties of Rock Material
12
PNT
Appendix-A
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR DETERMINATION OF SAFE BEARING

CAPACITY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MULTISTOREY BUILDING
AT DEVASHISH CITY, BORKHERA, KOTA
(FOR RAFT TYPE FOUNDATION)
BH NO. : 1 TO 5
1.0 Analysis of Raft Foundation

The allowable bearing pressure of subsoil strata have been computed for Raft foundation of
size 17 X 43 m at a depth of 4m. The analysis has been carried out for shear and settlement
failure considerations as per IS : 6403-1981, IS:8009 Part-I (1976) and IS:1904-1986.
1.1 Shear Failure Consideration

The net safe bearing capacity of subsoil strata for raft foundation has been worked out. The
following equation for net ultimate bearing capacity has been used in clay.
qnu = c.Nc.sc.dc.ic eq…...1
Where:
c = Unit cohesion
Nc = Bearing capacity factor
qnu = Net ultimate bearing capacity
sc = Shape factor
dc = Depth factor
ic = Inclination factor
The shear strength parameter obtained from the laboratory testing are as follows :
c = 7.5 t/m²
Ø = 0
Shape factor
sc = 1.08 (For Raft Foundation)
Bearing Capacity factor
Nc = 5.14
Nq = 1
Nγ = 0
Depth factors
dc = 1 + 0.2 (Df/B) √NØ
dc = 1
(Depth factors has been considered 1.0 because the proper compaction of back filling at the
site can not be ensured.)
Pg.1

PNT
Inclination factors.
Ic = 1
Other Data Used
(Assuming fully submerged
γ' = 1.0 t/m3 condition)
Df = 4
F.O.S. = 2.5
The net ultimate bearing capacity is obtained from equation (1) and given as follows :
qnu = 7.5 X 5.14 X 1.08
= 41.63 t/m²
Therefore,
qnu 41.63
qns = --------- = -----------
FOS 2.5
= 16.65 t/m²
The value of net safe bearing capacity (for depth of the foundation = 4m.) obtained from
above equation has been obtained as 16.65t/m².
1.2 Settlement Consideration

The settlement of foundation on cohesive soil can be calculated from the equation as
follows : (IS-8009 Part 1 - 1976)
c c Ho po + Δp
s = ------------ log10 -----------
1 + eo po
Where:
s = Settlement
cc = Compressive index
Ho = Thickness of layer
eo = Void ratio
po = Initial over burden pressure
Δp = Increase in pressure
Input Data
Width, B = 17 = 17
Lenth, L = 43 = 43
Area, A = BX L = 731
Depth, Df = = 4
Ho = 2 XB = 34
Base Width, B' = B + (Ho /2) = 34
Base Length, L' L + (Ho /2) = 60
Pg.2

PNT
Base Area, A' = B' X L' = 2040

Density, r' = 1 = 1
po = (Df + (Ho/2)) X r' = 21
qns = 10.0 t/m² = 10.0
Δp = qns X A / A' = 3.583
cc (average value) = 0.11 = 0.11
eo = 0.6 = 0.6
Cc Ho po + Δp
s= ---------- log10 -----------
1 + eo po
s= 2.338 log10 1.170635 = 0.160 m

s= 0.160 X 1000 = 159.94 mm
L/B = = 2.53
Sqrt of (LXB) /Df = 6.76
Df / Sqrt of (LXB) = 0.148
Depth Factor, df = 0.96 From Fig.12 of IS:8009 (Part-I) - 1976
Regidity Factor, rf = 0.8
sf = s X df X rf = 122.83 mm
which is less than permissible settlement of 125mm.

1.3 Allowable Bearing Capacity
The allowable bearing pressure is the maximum bearing pressure which can be applied on
the soil such that two fundamental requirements i.e.(i) adequate factor of safety with
respect to shear failure (ii) and settlement is within permissible limits are to be satisfied.
The allowable bearing pressure at the depth of Df=4m has been recommended as
10.0t/m² for the design of raft foundation. .
Pg.3

Appendix-B1
CALCULATION OF ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY OF PILE FOUNDATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF MULTISTOREY
BUILDING AT DEVASHISH CITY, BORKHERA, KOTA
BH-1
The analysis of bearing capacity has been carried out for rocky strata available at the site. Highly Weathered Rocky strata has been observed
at the depth of 16.00m. However, for highly weathered rock the safe load carrying capacity has been calculated as under. Therefore, length
of pile may be kept as depth upto rock level + socket length.
Load Carrying Capacity of Pile
A pile socketed into rock derives its capacity from end bearing and socket side resistance. The ultimate load carrying capacity may be
calculated from as per IRC:78-2014
Qu = Re + Raf = Ksp.qc.df.Ab + As Cus ………….1

Where
Qu = Ultimate capacity of pile socked into rock
Re = Ultimate end bearing
Raf = Ultimate side socket shear
Ksp = An empirical co-efficient whose value ranges from 0.3 to 1.2
qc = Average unconfined compressive strength of rock core
Ab = Cross-sectional area of base of pile
Length of socket
df = Depth factor 1 0.4 x
Dia of socket
However, value of df should not be taken more than 1.2

As = Surface area of socket

Cus = Ultimate shear strength along the socket length = 0.225 √qc , subjected to maximum of 5 MPa.
Allowable Load Carrying Capacity, Qa is given as follows :
Qa = Qu / FOS = Re /3 + Raf /6 ……….2

= (Ksp.qc.df.Ab )/3 + (AsCus)/ 6
Where : F.O.S. = 3 for end bearing component
PNT
= 6 for socket resistance
Pg.1
The unconfined compressive strength of the rocky strata have been determined in the laboratory. The minimum strength of 35(P) i.e. 35X24=
2808 t/m² has been taken for calculation of bearing capacity of the proposed piles.
The data used :

Diameter of pile, d = 600 & 1000 mm
Length of socket, l = 1000.0 mm
Other Data
Average (CR+RQD)/2 = 1/4 (56.0+0.0+45.33+0.0) = 25.3325 %
Ksp = 0.24 qc (t/m2)=
df = 1.2
qc = 28.08 N/mm²
Cus = 1.19 N/mm²
F.O.S. for Raf = 6

F.O.S. for Re = 3
Using above equation the load carrying capacity of various pile diameter are tabulated below :
Maximum
Allowable end Allowable end Allowable side Allowable Load
Socket Base area, Surface Area, Allowable End Recommended Safe
Dia of pile, bearing bearing socket shear Carrying Capacity
Length, Ab = (π / 4)d² As = π . d . l Bearing Load Carrying
d (mm) Component Component Component Qa = Re /3 + Raf /6
l (mm) (mm2) (mm2) Component Capacity Qs (t)
/ 3 (N/mm2) (Re / 3) (N) (Raf / 6) (N) (N)
(Mpa)
600.00 1000.00 282857.14 1320000.00 2.70 5.00 762458.30 262303.30 1024761.60 100.00
1000.00 1000.00 785714.29 2200000.00 2.70 5.00 2117939.73 437172.16 2555111.89 250.00
The load carrying capacity of the piles of other dimensions can be determined using above equation.
PNT
Pg.2
Appendix-B2
BH-2
The analysis of bearing capacity has been carried out for rocky strata available at the site. Rocky strata has been observed at the depth of 14.70m.
Therefore, length of pile may be kept as depth upto rock level + socket length.

A pile socketed into rock derives its capacity from end bearing and socket side resistance. The ultimate load carrying capacity may be calculated
from as per IRC:78-2014

Where
Length of socket
Dia of socket


Qa = Qu / FOS = Re /3 + Raf /6 ……….2

PNT
Pg.1
The unconfined compressive strength of the rocky strata have been determined in the laboratory. The minimum strength of 3472 t/m² has been
taken for calculation of bearing capacity of the proposed piles.
The data used :

Diameter of pile, d = 1000 mm
Other Data
Average (CR+RQD)/2 = 1/4 (58.89+32.22+58+42.67) = 47.945 %
Ksp = 0.53 qc (t/m2)=
df = 1.2
qc = 34.72 N/mm²
Cus = 1.33 N/mm²
F.O.S. for Raf = 6

F.O.S. for Re = 3
Maximum
Allowable end Allowable end Allowable side Allowable Load Recommended
Socket Base area, Surface Area, Allowable End
Dia of pile, bearing bearing socket shear Carrying Capacity Safe Load
Length, Ab = (π / 4)d² As = π . d . l Bearing
d (mm) Component Component Component Qa = Re /3 + Raf /6 Carrying
l (mm) (mm2) (mm2) Component
/ 3 (N/mm2) (Re / 3) (N) (Raf / 6) (N) (N) Capacity Qs (t)
(Mpa)
600.00 1000.00 282857.14 1320000.00 7.37 5.00 1414285.71 291672.21 1705957.93 150.00
1000.00 1000.00 785714.29 2200000.00 7.37 5.00 3928571.43 486120.36 4414691.78 350.00
PNT
Pg.2
Appendix-B3
BH-3


Where
Length of socket
Dia of socket


Qa = Qu / FOS = Re /3 + Raf /6 ……….2

PNT
Pg.1
The data used :

Other Data
Average (CR+RQD)/2 = 1/4 (49.44+16.67+48.67 +0.0) = 28.695 %
Ksp = 0.28 qc (t/m2)=
df = 1.2
qc = 35.75 N/mm²
Cus = 1.35 N/mm²
F.O.S. for Raf = 6

F.O.S. for Re = 3
Maximum
(Mpa)
600.00 1000.00 282857.14 1320000.00 4.05 5.00 1145590.22 295966.95 1441557.17 140.00
1000.00 1000.00 785714.29 2200000.00 4.05 5.00 3182195.05 493278.26 3675473.31 350.00
PNT
Pg.2
Appendix-B4
BH-4


Where
Length of socket
Dia of socket


Qa = Qu / FOS = Re /3 + Raf /6 ……….2

PNT
Pg.1
The data used :

Other Data
Average (CR+RQD)/2 = 1/2 (72.50+43.0) = 57.75 %
Ksp = 0.66 qc (t/m2)=
df = 1.2
qc = 39.24 N/mm²
Cus = 1.41 N/mm²
F.O.S. for Raf = 6

F.O.S. for Re = 3
Maximum
(Mpa)
600.00 1000.00 282857.14 1320000.00 10.31 5.00 1414285.71 310077.10 1724362.82 150.00
1000.00 1000.00 785714.29 2200000.00 10.31 5.00 3928571.43 516795.17 4445366.60 350.00
PNT
Pg.2
Appendix-B5
BH-5


Where
Length of socket
Dia of socket


Qa = Qu / FOS = Re /3 + Raf /6 ……….2

PNT
Pg.1
The data used :

Other Data
Average (CR+RQD)/2 = 1/4 (57.0+39.0+65.0+40.0) = 50.25 %
Ksp = 0.56 qc (t/m2)=
df = 1.2
qc = 34.92 N/mm²
Cus = 1.33 N/mm²
F.O.S. for Raf = 6

F.O.S. for Re = 3
Maximum
(Mpa)
600.00 1000.00 282857.14 1320000.00 7.83 5.00 1414285.71 292511.08 1706796.79 150.00
1000.00 1000.00 785714.29 2200000.00 7.83 5.00 3928571.43 487518.46 4416089.89 350.00
PNT
Pg.2
PNT
Appendix-C1
CALCULATION OF ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY OF PILE FOUNDATION FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF MULTISTOREY BUILDING AT DEVASHISH CITY, BORKHERA, KOTA
ESTIMATION OF MINIMUM SOCKET LENGTH OF PILES
Socket length in Rock Ls = 2H/(σ1 D) + sqrt((4H2/(σ12 d2) + ((6M)/(σ1 D)))
Ls = Length of socket
H = Horizontal load at top of socket
M = Moment at top of socket
D = Diameter of pile
σ1 = Permissible compressive strength of rock
= 0.33 x qc, qc in kg/cm2
or < 30 kg/cm2
Scour Depth = 0m
Cut-Off Level = 4m
Diameter of pile d = 0.6 m
Horizontal load at top of socket H = 40 kn
Length of pile above top of socket L1 = 12 m
Moment at top of socket M = 240 Kn-m
2
Unconfined Compressive strength of rock Qc = 280.80 kg/cm =2808 t/m²
2
Permissible compressive strength of rock σ1 = 30 kg/cm
2
(Lesser of 3 Mpa or 0.33*Qc) 3000 Kn/m
Min. Socket length in rock Ls = 0.940 m
Length of socket provided Ls = 1.000 m
1. The recommended lateral load carrying capacity is 4.0 tonnes for dia of 0.600m, socket 1.0m
2. The recommended lateral load carrying capacity is 7.0 tonnes for for dia of 1.0m, socket 1.0m

PNT
Appendix-C2
or < 30 kg/cm2
Scour Depth = 0m
Cut-Off Level = 4m
Length of pile above top of socket L1 = 10.7 m
Moment at top of socket M = 240.75 Kn-m
2
2
2

PNT
Appendix-C3
or < 30 kg/cm2
Scour Depth = 0m
Cut-Off Level = 4m
Length of pile above top of socket L1 = 10.7 m
2
2
2

PNT
Appendix-C4
or < 30 kg/cm2
Scour Depth = 0m
Cut-Off Level = 4m
Moment at top of socket M = 245 Kn-m
2
2
2

PNT
Appendix-C5
or < 30 kg/cm2
Scour Depth = 0m
Cut-Off Level = 4m
2
2
2

TABLE-1 : RESULT SHEET FOR BH-1
PROJECT : GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MULTISTORY BUILDING
MONTH - JULY’2017
IS Classification Sieve Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Natural Shear
Depth (m)
Bulk Density
N - value
with hydrometer test Moisture Parameter DFS *
Specific
Liquid Plastic
Gravity
content,% % cc
Gravel
Sand
Clay
(t/m3)
Limit c ø
Silt
Limit
%
Soil Descreption (Sr, %)
%
% % t/m2 deg.
-
-
- 1.0
- 5 0.85 44.95 38.48 15.72 25.36 18.52 10.50 2.70 1.45 - - 13.33 -
- 2.0
- v
LO W
- 3.0 11 PLASTIC 3.80 7.25 58.71 30.24 34.81 21.05 15.50 2.68 1.60 - - 11.11 -
- CLAY (CL)
- 4.0 MIXED WITH
SAN D
- 11
- 5.0
-
- 6.0 23 8.40 10.75 26.68 54.17 31.92 23.53 15.90 2.69 1.80 7.50 0.0 12.50 0.11
-
- 7.0
- R
- 8.0
-
- 9.0 45
* = Consolidation Test, cc = Compression Index, DFS = Differential Free Swell, v = Water Table
PNT
Sp = Swelling Pressure
Table-1 Cont..
Table-1 Cont..
MONTH - JULY’2017
Depth (m)
Bulk Density
N - value
Specific
Liquid Plastic
Gravity
content,% % cc
Gravel
Sand
Clay
(t/m3)
Limit c ø
Silt
Limit
%
%
% % t/m2 deg.
-
-
-10.0
- 29 LO W
-11.0 PLASTIC
CLAY (CL)
- MIXED WITH 4.75 60.50 27.11 7.64 22.48 NP 10.80 2.71 1.94 - - 0.0 -
-12.0 49 SAN D 9.65 24.85 57.64 7.86 29.32 19.30 - 2.70 1.90 12.50 0.0 12.50 0.10
-
-13.0
- 41
-14.0
-
-15.0 26
16.65 32.05 43.61 7.70 31.48 20.17 - - - - - 13.33 -

-
-16.0
- Table Cont..
-17.0
-
-18.0
PNT
Table-1 Cont..
Table-1 Cont..
MONTH - JULY’2017
Bore Core RQD qu Density Return Water
Depth N- Description of
Log Recovery (%) (t/m²) (t/m3) Remark
(m) Values Strata
(%) Color Loss (%)
- 16.0
56.00 0.00 117(P) 2.42 Whitish 30
- HIGHLY
- 17.0 WEATHERED
R OC K 45.33 0.00 - - Whitish 30
-
- 18.0
-
- 19.0
-
- 20.0
-
- 21.0
-
- 22.0
-
- 23.0
-
- 24.0
-
- 25.0
-
- 26.0
R = Refusal to SPT (N> 50), RQD = Rock Quality Designation, qu =Unixial Compressive Strength v = Water Table
PNT
MONTH - JULY’2017
Depth (m)
Bulk Density
N - value
Specific
Liquid Plastic
Gravity
content,% % cc
Gravel
Sand
Clay
(t/m3)
Limit c ø
Silt
Limit
%
%
% % t/m2 deg.
-
-
- 1.0
- 20 2.05 26.95 62.48 8.52 30.15 21.21 - - - - - 14.26 -
- 2.0
- v
LO W
- 3.0 13 PLASTIC 3.30 12.20 71.83 12.68 31.41 21.70 - - - - - 15.12 -
- CLAY (CL)
- 4.0 MIXED WITH
SAN D
- 25 3.15 15.40 26.88 54.57 33.90 20.55 14.80 2.68 1.79 7.6 0.0 11.11 0.11
- 5.0
-
- 6.0 33 5.75 20.20 25.92 48.13 28.81 22.30 - - 1.91 - - 12.56 -
-
- 7.0
- 26 15.20 16.90 27.84 40.06 29.79 14.62 - - - - - 13.33 -
- 8.0
-
- 9.0 34
PNT
Table-2 Cont..
Table-2 Cont..
MONTH - JULY’2017
Depth (m)
Bulk Density
N - value
Specific
Liquid Plastic
Gravity
content,% % cc
Gravel
Sand
Clay
(t/m3)
Limit c ø
Silt
Limit
%
%
% % t/m2 deg.
-
-
-10.0
- 28 LO W 23.50 22.20 35.84 18.46 32.75 10.89 - 2.70 1.85 11.50 0.0 5.56 0.10
-11.0 PLASTIC
CLAY (CL)
- MIXED WITH 4.75 60.50 27.11 7.64 22.48 NP 10.80 2.71 1.94 - - 0.0 -
-12.0 15 SAN D
-
-13.0
- 42
-14.0
--14.7
-15.0 Table Cont..
-
-16.0
-
-17.0
-
-18.0
PNT
Table-2 Cont..
Table-2 Cont..
MONTH - JULY’2017
(m) Values Strata
(%) Color Loss (%)
--14.7
- 58.89 32.22 3472 2.42 Whitish 30
COARSE
- 16.0
GR AINED
- HARD
- 17.0 R OC K 58.00 42.67 - Whitish 25
-
- 18.0
- 67.00 34.00 3558 2.51 Whitish 30
- 19.0
-
- 20.0
-
- 21.0
-
- 22.0
-
- 23.0
-
- 24.0
-
PNT
MONTH - AUG.’2017
Depth (m)
Bulk Density
N - value
Specific
Liquid Plastic
Gravity
content,% % cc
Gravel
Sand
Clay
(t/m3)
Limit c ø
Silt
Limit
%
%
% % t/m2 deg.
-
-
- 1.0
- 5
- 2.0
- v
LO W
- 3.0 8 PLASTIC 0.00 39.85 15.04 45.11 29.29 9.89 - - - - - 18.00 -
- CLAY (CL)
- 4.0 MIXED WITH
SAN D
- 10
- 5.0
-
- 6.0 12 15.25 23.60 55.04 6.12 23.57 15.96 - 2.69 1.69 7.30 0.0 16.67 0.12
-
- 7.0
- 15
- 8.0 10.90 17.40 62.38 9.32 33.94 16.85 - - - - - 10.53 -
-
- 9.0 16
PNT
Table-3 Cont..
Table-3 Cont..
MONTH - AUG.’2017
Depth (m)
Bulk Density
N - value
Specific
Liquid Plastic
Gravity
content,% % cc
Gravel
Sand
Clay
(t/m3)
Limit c ø
Silt
Limit
%
%
% % t/m2 deg.
- 16
-
-10.0
- 50 LO W
-11.0 PLASTIC
CLAY (CL)
- MIXED WITH 4.75 60.50
12.30 22.25 27.11
58.25 7.64
7.20 22.48
32.25 15.20
NP 10.80
- 2.68
2.71 1.90
1.94 12.50
- 0.0
- 11.11
0.0 0.10
-
-12.0 18 SAN D
-
-13.0
- 34
-14.0
--14.7
-15.0 Table Cont..
-
-16.0
-
-17.0
-
-18.0
PNT
Table-3 Cont..
Table-3 Cont..
MONTH - AUG.’2017
(m) Values Strata
(%) Color Loss (%)
-14.7
-
- 49.44 16.67 3575 2.75 Whitish 30
- 16.0
- MODERATELY
- 17.0 WEATHERED
HARD ROCK 48.67 0.00 - - Whitish 40
-
- 18.0
- 77.00 11.00 3443 2.70 Whitish 40
- 19.0
-
- 20.0
-
- 21.0
-
- 22.0
-
- 23.0
-
- 24.0
-
PNT
MONTH - JULY’2017
Depth (m)
Bulk Density
N - value
Specific
Liquid Plastic
Gravity
content,% % cc
Gravel
Sand
Clay
(t/m3)
Limit c ø
Silt
Limit
%
%
% % t/m2 deg.
-
-
- 1.0
- 15 7.00 21.20 23.69 48.11 29.98 19.29 - - - - - 15.56 -
- 2.0
- v
LO W
- 3.0 13 PLASTIC
- CLAY (CL)
- 4.0 MIXED WITH
SAN D
- 29 4.50 22.50 24.09 48.91 31.53 20.47 14.80 2.68 1.85 8.0 0.0 11.11 0.11
- 5.0
-
- 6.0 31
-
- 7.0
- 38 0.75 34.75 20.64 43.86 34.65 22.68 - - - - - 11.11 -
- 8.0
-
- 9.0 38
PNT
Table-4 Cont..
Table-4 Cont..
MONTH - JULY’2017
Depth (m)
Bulk Density
N - value
Specific
Liquid Plastic
Gravity
content,% % cc
Gravel
Sand
Clay
(t/m3)
Limit c ø
Silt
Limit
%
%
% % t/m2 deg.
- 38
-
-10.0
- 47 LO W
-11.0 PLASTIC
CLAY (CL)
- MIXED WITH 4.75
8.10 60.50
34.95 27.11 36.45
20.50 7.64 22.48
21.90 20.41
NP 10.80
- 2.71
2.69 1.94
1.84 10.00
- 0.00
- 16.67
0.0 0.11
-
-12.0 26 SAN D
-
-13.0
- 29
-14.0
--14.7
-15.0 Table Cont..
-
-16.0
-
-17.0
-
-18.0
PNT
Table-4 Cont..
Table-4 Cont..
MONTH - JULY’2017
(m) Values Strata
(%) Color Loss (%)
-
- 14.0
- 34.67 8.00 2208 2.35
- 15.0 HIGHLY
- WEATHERED
- 16.0 R OC K 35.33 0.00 106(P) 2.46 Yellowish 65
-
- 17.0
- 68.67 0.00
- 18.0
- COARSE
- 19.0 GR AINED 72.50 43.00 3924 2.49 Brownish 85
- HARD ROCK
- 20.0
-
- 21.0
-
- 22.0
-
- 23.0
-
PNT
MONTH - JULY’2017
Depth (m)
Bulk Density
N - value
Specific
Liquid Plastic
Gravity
content,% % cc
Gravel
Sand
Clay
(t/m3)
Limit c ø
Silt
Limit
%
%
% % t/m2 deg.
-
-
- 1.0
- 16 5.75 37.50 16.46 40.29 28.65 16.80 - - - - - 15.36
- 2.0
-
LO W
- 3.0 25 PLASTIC
- CLAY (CL)
- 4.0 MIXED WITH
SAN D
- 29 6.00 15.00 51.35 27.65 33.11 18.87 15.50 2.70 1.83 8.0 0.0 11.11 0.11
- 5.0
-
- 6.0 34
-
- 7.0
- 40 12.50 28.50 20.06 38.94 33.67 21.37 - - - - - 10.00 -
- 8.0
-
- 9.0 R
PNT
Table-5 Cont..
Table-5 Cont..
MONTH - JULY’2017
Depth (m)
Bulk Density
N - value
Specific
Liquid Plastic
Gravity
content,% % cc
Gravel
Sand
Clay
(t/m3)
Limit c ø
Silt
Limit
%
%
% % t/m2 deg.
- R
-
-10.0 22.25 16.50 20.83 40.43 33.43 19.13 - - 1.95 - - 12.52 -
- R LO W
-11.0 PLASTIC
CLAY (CL)
- MIXED WITH 4.75 60.50 27.11 7.64 22.48 NP 10.80 2.71 1.94 - - 0.0 -
-12.0 R SAN D 9.00 18.00 22.63 50.37 33.72 21.30 - - - - - 11.76
-
-13.0
- 29
-14.0
--14.7
-15.0 Table Cont..
-
-16.0
-
-17.0
-
-18.0
PNT
Table-5 Cont..
Table-5 Cont..
MONTH - JULY’2017
(m) Values Strata
(%) Color Loss (%)
- 14.0
- HIGHLY WEATHERED 20.00 0.00 - -
ROCK
- 15.0
- 57.00 39.00 3492 2.54 Brownish 35
- 16.0
- COARSE 65.00 40.00 3981 2.57
- 17.0 GR AINED
- HARD 69.00 24.00 - - Brownish 30
- 18.0 R OC K
- 69.00 24.00 - -
- 19.0
-
- 20.0
-
- 21.0
-
- 22.0
-
- 23.0
-
PNT

Kota Devashish Colony Om Const

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Kota Devashish Colony Om Const

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

PNT

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR

Geotechnical Investigation Report

0.60 12.00 100.00 4.00

0.60 10.70 150.00 4.50

0.60 10.70 140.00 4.50

0.60 14.00 150.00 3.50

0.60 11.00 150.00 4.50

ISO 9001:2008 Quality Certified Lab.

S. No. TOPIC PAGE NO.

2.0 SCOPE OF WORK 1

3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION 2

4.0 LABORATORY INVESTIGATION 2

5.0 INTERPRETATION OF TEST RESULTS 3

6.0 FOUNDATION ANALYSIS 4

ISO 9001:2008 Quality Certified Lab.

The Schedule of work and the locations of bore holes were

2.0 SCOPE OF WORK

recommendation of SBC & type of foundation as per IS: 6403-1981,

Accordingly, five bore holes with standard penetration test

3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION

3.2 Standard Penetration Test (SPT)

3.3 Water Table

4.0 LABORATORY INVESTIGATION

5.0 INTERPRETATION OF TEST RESULTS

5.2 Swelling Characteristics

6.0 FOUNDATION ANALYSIS

(i) The foundation must be safe against shear failure.

For the foundation resting on Soil, a permissible total

For foundation resting on Rock, a permissible total settlement

6.1 For the Structures Resting on Rocky Strata

TABLE-A :NET SAFE BEARING PRESSURE (qns) BASED

6.1.3 Based on Core Strength of the Rock

In case of rock mass with favorable characteristics that

S = spacing of discontinuities in cm, and

6.1.4 Correction to the Net Safe Bearing Pressure

Allowances should be made for submerged conditions,

6.2 For the Structures Resting on Soil Strata

The allowable bearing pressure of subsoil strata shall be

7.0 CALCULATION OF ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE

7.2 Pile Foundation

8.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

2. The results of particle size analysis and plastic characteristics of soil

6. Bored Pile foundation

Safe Load Lateral Load

0.60 12.00 100.00 4.00

0.60 10.70 150.00 4.50

0.60 10.70 140.00 4.50

0.60 14.00 150.00 3.50

0.60 11.00 150.00 4.50

FOR PNT DESIGNS PVT. LTD.,

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR DETERMINATION OF SAFE BEARING

1.0 Analysis of Raft Foundation

1.1 Shear Failure Consideration

ISO 9001:2008 Quality Certified Lab.

1.2 Settlement Consideration

ISO 9001:2008 Quality Certified Lab.

Base Area, A' = B' X L' = 2040

s= 2.338 log10 1.170635 = 0.160 m

which is less than permissible settlement of 125mm.

ISO 9001:2008 Quality Certified Lab.

Qu = Re + Raf = Ksp.qc.df.Ab + As Cus ………….1

However, value of df should not be taken more than 1.2

As = Surface area of socket