Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
2017
Key words: Physicochemical analyses, Creek water, Risk quotient, Water quality index
Abstract
Creek water carries both domestic and commercial wastewater consequently draining organic and inorganic
pollutants to coastal water. The present study dealt on the environmental risk assessment of creek water
stretching in Macabalan-Cagayan de Oro, Philippines. Selected physicochemical analyses of water samples were
carried in both temporal and spatial variations. Risk quotient (RQ), water quality index (WQI), and brine shrimp
lethality test (BSL) was employed to draw environmental risk estimate. Overall, dissolved oxygen (DO)
concentrations were below the standard set regardless of temporal and spatial variations. Both RQ and WQI
showed good statuses on creek water quality despite the low DO. The BSLT similarly indicated a higher
concentration for LC50 to be established. The study was preliminary and further monitoring may be essential.
*Corresponding Author: Van Ryan Kristopher R. Galarpe vanryangalarpe@gmail.com
The present study focused on Macabalan creek in Fig. 1. Area of the study sties a) site 1; b) site 2; c) site 3.
Cagayan de Oro. Surface water on the creek
potentially carrying contaminants flows through the Table 1. Coordinates of the study sites.
adjacent Macajalar Bay. This study was conducted to Study Specific Latitude Longitude
quantitatively determine selected physicochemical site location
1 Celri 8°30’03.3’’N 124°39’37.3’’ E
parameters on the creek with reference to existing Macabalan
2 Piaping 8°30’01.3’’N 124°39’43.7’’E
standard. The environmental risk assessment was Itum-Puti
deduced from the assessed Risk quotient (RQ), Water Macabalan
3 Punta 8°30’05.4’’N 124°39’51.1’’E
quality index (WQI), and toxicity testing. Macabalan
Sampling technique procedures Table 2. Water quality reference for the study sites.
Samples were stored in pre-washed polyethylene Standard Description
Philippines Waters suitable for the propagation,
containers (PET) with distilled water in triplicates. DENR/DAO 34 survival, and harvesting of shellfish
Prior to collection the container itself were washed Class SA for commercial purposes.
with the flowing creek water on site. Within an hour Philippines Recreational water class I –Areas
DENR/DAO 34 regularly used by the public for
after collection the water samples were analyzed to Class SB bathing, swimming, skin diving, etc).
prevent sample loss or chemical absorption (Galarpe Fishery water class I – Spawning
areas
and Parilla, 2014). US EPA Reference standard for the US
Environmental Protection Agency
EPA AUS Reference standard for the
Environmental Protection Agency of
Physicochemical Analysis
Australia
The pH, temperature, conductivity, salinity, and TDS WHO (2011) Reference standard for alkalinity
Statistical analysis and risk assessment The Qi (Eq. 2) refers to the quality rating scale for
Both descriptive and inferential statistics were every parameter. Qi were calculated as the ratio of Ci
employed to analyze the obtained data. One Way- = determined concentration and Si = water quality
ANOVA was employed to compare the standard. The Qi for DO employed another method
physicochemical parameters in all study sites (0.05 (Eq 3) adopted from other studies (Alobaidy et al.,
level of significance). 2010; Meher et al., 2015) where Vi is the ideal value
for DO set as 14.6. Further, sub-indices (SIi) as shown
in Eq. 4 were calculated to determine the WQI (Eq 5).
The Pearson correlation was similarly used to
Reference scale for WQI is shown in Table 3.
determine association among parameters studied. To
derive an environmental risk estimate all results were
Table 3. WQI Scale (Yadav et al., 2010; Meher et al.,
subjected to RQ and WQI analysis. The RQ was
2015).
calculated as the ratio between the determined
concentration and the available standard WQI Water quality
0-25 Excellent
(GEF/UNDP/IMO 2004). The calculated RQ >1 can
26-50 Good
gauge the physiochemical parameter to likely pose 51-75 Poor
environmental risk. The reference standard used for 76-100 Very poor
estimating RQ is shown in Table 2. Above 100 Unsuitable
Toxicity testing was statistically calculated. The The DO was within the range 0.91-0.97 ppm,
average mortality and LC50 in toxicity was expressed considerably lower than the permissible limit. The
using Probit analysis method. amount of organic material can be a factor to affect
DO levels. The study site is a refuse end of domestic
Spatial and temporal variations of water quality TDS, and alkalinity showed statistical difference (p
parameters <0.05) indicating site specific difference. This
The result of the statistical analyses is summarized in difference can be associated to increasing trend of
Table 8. The pH, temperature, conductivity, salinity, concentrations on the third sampling period.
Environmental risk assessment Results of WQI can ranked as site 3 (48.12) > site 1
RQ and WQI (46.28) > site 2 (45.23). Despite the moderately
The RQ analysis (Table 9) showed no potential risk acceptable WQI the current situation in Macabalan
except for DO which were considerably below the creek can be aggravated owing to proliferation of
standard set. These results were in agreement with adjacent establishments (within the 20 m buffer zone).
further WQI analysis (Table 10-12). The WQI analysis
was adopted from Meher et al. (2015). Calculated In return the effluent runoff from the residential area,
mean WQI value was 46.54, ranging from 45-49, salt factory, and other establishments may
classified as good (Meher et al., 2015; Yadav et al., consequently alter the water quality.
2010).
studied (Fig. 2-4) using probit analysis. variation was evidenced among studied parameters
with positive correlation for TDS, salinity, and
conductivity. Environmental risk analysis using RQ,
Calculated LC50 was higher in site 2 (3331.348)
WQI, and toxicity test similarly indicate a moderately
than site 3 (1201.062) and site 1 (0.980). Overall
acceptable estimate for water quality. Extrapolating
the calculated mean LC50 in Macabalan creek was
from this the studied site needs monitoring to ensure
1511.13 (Table 13).
water quality of creek water/wastewater discharged to
coastal bodies.
Philippines: a comparison of water quality. Mindanao Southern Philippines. Science. Dec 22;6(2).
Chapman DV. Water Quality Assessments. Maglangit FF, Galapate RP, Bensig EO. 2015.
1996. A guide to use Biota, Sediments and An assessment of the organic pollution level of
Water Environmental Monitorin (2nd ed.). UNESCO, Buhisan, Bulacao and Lahug rivers, Cebu,
WHO and UNEP. E & FN Spon, London UK. Philippines. WALIA Journal 31(S3), 61-4.
Martinez FB, Mijares MB, Galera IC. 2011. Salvane LA, Felicilda K, Rabadon C, Vasay
Assessment of the Water Quality of Mamba River of MM, Equipelag L, Duco DM, Galarpe VRK.
Mts. Palaypalay/Mataasna Gulod, Southern Luzon, 2017. Analyses of Physicochemical Parameters of
Philippines. In International Conference on
Selected Tap Water Samples in Cagayan de Oro
Chemistry and Chemical Process. IPCBEE (Vol. 10).
(District I), Philippines. IOSR Journal of
Meher PK, Sharma P, Gautam YP, Kumar A, Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food
Mishra KP. 2015. Evaluation of Water Quality of Technology (IOSR-JESTFT) 2(5), 53-58.
Ganges River Using Water Quality Index Tool.
Environment Asia. Jan 1, 8(1). Yadav AK, Khan P, Sharma SK. 2010. Water
Quality Index Assessment of Groundwater in
Naubi I, Zardari NH, Shirazi SM, Ibrahim NF,
Todaraisingh Tehsil of Rajasthan State, India-A Greener
Baloo L. 2016. Effectiveness of Water Quality Index
Approach. Journal of Chemistry 7(S1), S428-32.
for Monitoring Malaysian River Water Quality. Polish
Journal of Environmental Studies. Jan 1, 25(1).