Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
A little over a year has passed since the second edition of this
book was published, and, by God’s grace, copies are no longer
available for distribution. However, the public demand for the book
has progressively increased, especially since its disappearance from
the bookstores. My impressions concerning the need throughout the
Muslim world for the clarifications and recommendations contained
in the text have proven true. Not merely because the book has been
relative commercial success, but because of the very positive
intellectual response which I have received from those who has read
it. In fact, in order to make the information contained in the text
available to an even wider audience, some readers have already
undertaken a Tamil translation of the book, and an Urdu translation
has also been commissioned. Consequently, I felt obliged to reprint
the book, in order to meet the growing commercial demand for the
book.
-i-
alluded to in the text have been quoted in the footnotes and or
referenced. There have also been some cosmetic changes, like the
improved cover design and the reduction of the size of the book, all of
which I hope will make this edition somewhat more attractive than its
predecessor.
In closing, I ask Almighty Allah to bless this effort by
making it reach those who may most benefit from it, and by adding it
to my scale of good deeds on the day of Judgement.
The pressing need for this book can easily be seen in the
dilemma of convert Muslims. In the course of being educated in the
basic laws of Islaam, a convert Muslim is gradually presented with a
1
Madh-hab is derived from the verb Dhahaba which means to go. Madh-hab
literally means a way of going or simply a path. The position of an
outstanding scholar on a particular point was also referred to as his Madh-
hab (the path of his ideas or his opinion). Eventually, it was used to refer to
the sum total of a scholar’s opinions, whether legal or philosophical. Later it
was used to denote, not only the scholar’s opinion, but also that of his
students and followers.
- ii -
body of laws based on one of the four canonical schools. At the same
time he may be informed that there are three other canonical schools,
and that all four schools are divinely ordained and infallible. At first
this presents no problem for the convert Muslim, since he merely
follows the laws presented by his particular teacher, who of course
follows one particular Madh-hab. When however, the new Muslim
convert establishes contact with other Muslims from various parts of
the Islamic world, he invariably becomes aware of certain differences
in some of the Islamic laws as taught by one of another of the Madh-
habs. His teacher, a Muslim born into the faith, will no doubt assure
him that all four Madh-habs are correct in themselves and that so long
as he follows one of them he is on the right path. However, some of
the differences from one school to another are perplexing for the new
Muslim convert. For example, common sense tells him that one
cannot be in a state of Wudoo1 while being out of it at the same time.
But according to one Madh-hab, certain acts break Wudoo, while
according to another Madh-hab those same acts do not2. How can a
given act be both allowable (Halaal) and forbidden (Haraam) at the
same time. This contradiction has also become apparent to thinking
Muslims, young and old, who are concerned about the prevailing
stagnation and decline in the Muslim world and who are advocating
the revival of Islam in its original purity and unity.
- iii -
Muslims in the past and which continues to do so today. The former
position of rejecting the Madh-habs in their entirety, and
consequently the Fiqh of earlier generations, leads inevitably to
extremism and deviation when those who rely exclusively on the
Qur’aan and the Sunnah attempt to apply Sharee’ah law to new
situations which were not specifically ruled on in eitheir the Qur’aan
or the Sunnah. Clearly, both of these outcomes are serious threats to
the solidarity and purity of Islam. As the prophet (sw.) stated, “The
best generation is my generation and then those who follow them” 1. If
we accept the divinely inspired wisdom of the Prophet (sw.), it
follows that the farther we go from the prophet (sw.) generation, the
less likely we are to be able it interpret correctly and apply the real
intentions implied in the Qur’aan and the Sunnah. An equally obvious
deduction is the fact that the rulings of older scholars of note are more
likely to represent the true intentions deducible from the Qur’aan and
the Sunnah. These older rulings – the basis of Fiqh - are therefore
important links and guidelines which cannot wisely be ignored in out
study and continued application of Allaah’s laws. It stands to reason
that out knowledge and correct application of these laws depend upon
a sound knowledge of the evolution of Fiqh over the ages. Similarly,
a study of this development automatically embraces a study of the
evolution of the Madh-habs and their important contributions to Fiqh,
as well as the reasons for apparent contradictions in some of their
rulings.
- iv -
practical application of the laws which underlie and shape the way of
life known as Islam.
The basic material for this book was taken from my clall
notes and research poapers for a graduate course on the history of
Islamic legislation (Taareekh at-Taashree‘) taught by Dr. ‘Assaal at
the University of Riyadh. The material was translated into English,
further developed and utilized as teaching material for a grade twelve
Islamic Education class which I taught at Manarat ar-Riyadh private
school in 1880-81. This teaching text was published in the spring of
1982 by As-Suq Bookstore, Brooklyn, New York, under the title,
Lessons in Fiqh. The present work is a revised and expanded edition
of Lessons in Fiqh.
It is hoped that this book on the history of Fiqh will help the
reader to place the Madh-habs in proper perspective and to appreciate
the pressing need for their re-unification.
Was-Salaam ‘Alaykum,
Abu Ameenah Bilal Philips
25th Nov. 1983/21st Safar 1404
TRANSLITERATION
-v-
a l
b m
t n
th h
j h/t1
h w
kh y
d VOWELS
r Short Vowels
z a
s I
sh u
s Long Vowels
d
t
dH ee
‘ oo
gh Dipthongs
f
q aw
k ay
1
This taa has been commonly transliterated as “t” in all cases. However,
such a system is not accurate and does not represent Arabic pronunciation.
- vi -
No transliteration can express exactly the vocalic differences
between two languages nor can Roman characters give anything more
than an approximate sound of the original Arabic words and phrases.
There is also the difficulty of romanizing certain combinations of
Arabic words which are pronounced differently from the written
characters. Included in this category is the prefix “al” (representint the
article “the”). When it precedes words beginning with letters known
as al-Huroof ash-Shamseeyah (lit. solar letters), the sound of “l” is
merged into the following letter; for example, al Rahmaan is
pronounced ar-Rahmaan. Whereas, in the case of all other laetters,
known as al-Qamareeyag (lit. lunar letters), the “al” is pronounced
fully. I have followed the pronunciation for the facility of the average
reader by writing ar-Rahmaan instead of al-Rahmaan and so on.
Note:
- vii -