Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ANGKATAN 2014
Oleh:
TAHUN 2018
1. Hastie, Chen, and Kuo’s Work (2007)
Educational Technology & Society, 10 (4), 281-294.
DIFFERENCES
The topic of this research is instructional designers at work. This
research focused on the instructional designer, whereas the topic of the
current research discusses the instructional design for the teaching of
writing skill at MAN 1 Surakarta. In the current research focused on the
instructional design used by the teacher in teaching learning process of
writing skill. The objectives of this research are to know constitutes good
instructional design and to describe how instructional designers create
good design, whereas the objective of the current research is to describe of
the instructional design used by the teacher in the teaching of writing skill
at MAN 1 Surakarta.
Technique of collecting data used was interview with a group of
eight professional instructional designers responsible for helping
university faculty members shift some of their instruction to an online
Learning Management System (WebCT Vista, in this case) or other web-
based environments, whereas techniques of collecting data used in the
current research were observation, interview, and document analysis. The
technique of analyzing data used (a) listening to the recordings, (b)
reviewing the researcher‘s note, and (c) analyzing and grouping interview
results into rough categories, whereas in the current research using the
qualitative descriptive method. The steps of analyzing qualitative data
consist of 1) data reduction, 2) data display, and 3) conclusion.
SIMILARITIES
Jin and Boling’s work and the current research have the similarities
of research. First, both of the research discuss the instructional design.
Instructional design is learning process designed by teachers in order to
help them in teaching at the classroom based on the available resources
and focuses on what the instruction should be like, including look, feel,
organization and functionality. Second, research design both of the
research were qualitative. Third, the techniques of collecting data both of
the research using observation, interview, and document analysis.
DIFFERENCES
The topic of this research talks about instructional designer‘s
intentions and learners‘ perceptions of the instructional functions of
visuals in an e-learning context, whereas the topic of the current research
is discussed about instructional design for the teaching of writing skill at
MAN 1 Surakarta. The objective of this research is to compare an
instructional designer‘s intentions with the learners‘ perceptions of the
instructional functions of visuals in one specific e-learning lesson. An
instructional designer created each visual with more than two purposes
related to the psychological, cognitive, and affective aspects of learning,
whereas the objective of the current research is to describe of the
instructional design used by the teacher in the teaching of writing skill at
MAN 1 Surakarta.
The technique of analyzing data used was content analysis. It
consists of two phases: the first phase includes defining, recording and
contextualizing units, and sorting the units; the second phase includes
making inferences about the data relative to the context, whereas in the
current research using the qualitative descriptive method. The steps of
analyzing qualitative data consist of 1) data reduction, 2) data display, and
3) conclusion.
SIMILARITIES
Yaratan and Kural’s work and the current research have the
similarities of research. First, both of the research discuss the instructional
design. Instructional design is learning process designed by teachers in
order to help them in teaching at the classroom based on the available
resources and focuses on what the instruction should be like, including
look, feel, organization and functionality. Second, the research design both
of the research was qualitative design.
DIFFERENCES
Topic of this research talks about middle school English language
teachers‘ perceptions of instructional technology implementation in North
Cyprus. This research focused on instructional technology to English
classes, whereas the topic of the current research discusses the
instructional design for the teaching of writing skill at MAN 1 Surakarta.
In the current research focused on the instructional design used by the
teacher in teaching learning process of writing skill. This research
investigated the current state of instructional technology utilization in
English Language classes at middle schools in North Cyprus. This study
intended to reveal teacher‘s perceptions of the contribution of technology
to English classes, whereas the current research is to describe of the
instructional design used by the teacher in the teaching of writing skill at
MAN 1 Surakarta.
The population was 253 English Language teachers serving in 30
middle schools in North Cyprus. Twenty-one schools were randomly
selected from the total of 30 by using random cluster sampling method.
The selection was conducted by writing the names of the schools on
different pieces of papers, putting them in a container and then drawing
lots, whereas the current research is tenth-grade students. Techniques of
collecting data used were observation and questionnaire, whereas
techniques of collecting data of the current research were observation,
interview, and document analysis. Techniques of analyzing data used were
the reliability analyses, whereas in the current research using the
qualitative descriptive method. The steps of analyzing qualitative data
consist of 1) data reduction, 2) data display, and 3) conclusion.
10. Aytekin İşman, Fahme Dabaj, Zehra Altinay, Fahriye Altinay’s Work
(2003)
Title: Effects of Instructional Design on Learning
SIMILARITIES
Aytekin İşman, Fahme Dabaj, Zehra Altinay, Fahriye Altinay’s work
and the current research have the similarities of research. First, both of the
research discuss the instructional design. Instructional design is learning
process designed by teachers in order to help them in teaching at the
classroom based on the available resources and focuses on what the
instruction should be like, including look, feel, organization and
functionality. The second, Techniques of collecting data both of the
research were observation, interview, and document analysis.
DIFFERENCES
The topic of this research talks about effects of instructional design
on learning. The research focused on the general of learning. whereas the
topic of the current research discusses the instructional design for the
teaching of writing skill at MAN 1 Surakarta. In the current research
focused on the instructional design used by the teacher in teaching
learning process of writing skill. The objective of this research is to know
the usage of instructional design and effects of instructional design on
learning in schools, whereas the aims of the current research are to
describe of the instructional design used by the teacher in the teaching of
writing skill at MAN 1 Surakarta.
The research design of this research was quantitative design
especially the experimental research, whereas the research design of the
current research is qualitative design. The technique of analyzing data
used the t-test, whereas in the current research using the qualitative
descriptive method. The steps of analyzing qualitative data consist of 1)
data reduction, 2) data display, and 3) conclusion.